research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. theses. project database. collaborations....

32
research.chalmers.se

Upload: others

Post on 01-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

research.chalmers.se

Page 2: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 3: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 4: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

research.chalmers.se

Page 5: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Create a research information system

(projects first)

Page 6: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

UX expertise, librarians and systems developers

Page 7: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Scrum master

Developers

Product owner

Build the right thing!

Build the thing right!

Build the thing fast!

SCRUM team

Page 8: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 9: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Input from stakeholders

Page 10: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 11: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 12: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 13: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 14: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 15: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 16: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Was there a system for these needs?

Page 17: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Was there a system for these needs?

Not at that time!

Page 18: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

What did you do?We started from scratch,

doing one thing at a time.

Page 19: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

How did it go?I’ll tell you now!

Page 20: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

2014 20172016 20182015 2019

Theses

Project database

Collaborations

Persons

Institutional repository

Visualisations

Semi-automatedclassification

StudiesNeeds/UXInspiration

??

?

Research data

Activities

Impact stories/cases

research.chalmers.se

Page 21: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Projects • Visualising project information, cooperations and collaborations.• Work flow

ImportChalmers contractdatabase

Metadata enhancementThe Library

Data validationProject participants

Visible for staff.

Once validatedvisible on the web and via API:s etc.

* research.chalmers.se contains ~3 000 projects (2018-06-08)

Page 22: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Publications • Visualising co-authoring and collaborations, loads of identifiers.• Work flow

ImportScopus/SciVal& Web ofscience

Data enhancementThe Library

Gets emailAuthors

Visible on the web and via API:s etc

* research.chalmers.se contains ~60 000 publications (2018-06-08)

ManuallyAuthors

Page 23: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

User needs

Page 24: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Data in and out• Automatic import of publications from Scopus and Web of Science• Prefilled forms for local authors (based on ISBN-orders)• Automatic classification, based on abstract and publication channel,

based on a text mining tool and data learning• Projects come in from contractual database (Eko), initially also from

Cordis and SweCris• Person data from staff database and ORCID.org

• Data is exported to CMS, reference systems, the web (Google, Baidu, Yandex, etc), metrics database etc.

Page 25: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

User needs

Page 26: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

• Automatic classification of publications• Automatic ISBN-ordering• Tools for mergeing and administering duplicates• Easy-to-use interfaces• Less metadata fields than before

Helping administrators

Page 27: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

User reactions

Page 28: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification
Page 29: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Let the developers choose the technology Talk to the users about what they need and show them stuff Do not plan years ahead, solve what is needed and creates

value for the users now Work in iterations, i.e. release small things often Prioritise - do one thing at a time Dare to fail

Lessons learned

Page 30: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Prepare to adapt quickly to changes, since the world is movingfast

Try your hypotheses with real users Requirements come to you as you develop Every busy researcher still seem to have 15 minutes for a

meeting, when asked nicely.

Lessons learned

Page 31: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

Prepare to adapt quickly to changes, since the world is movingfast

Try your hypotheses with real users Requirements come to you as you develop Every busy researcher still seem to have 15 minutes for a

meeting, when asked nicely.

Lessons learned

Page 32: research.chalmers...2014. 2015. 2016. 2017. 2018. 2019. Theses. Project database. Collaborations. Persons. Institutional repository. Visualisations. Semi-automated classification

[email protected]

research.chalmers.se

Open source software? Yes, when we are done.