zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · zero deforestation initiatives and their...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Zerodeforestationinitiativesandtheirimpactsoncommoditysupplychains
Discussionpaperpreparedforthe57thSessionoftheFAOAdvisoryCommitteeonSustainableForest-basedIndustries
![Page 2: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Zerodeforestationinitiativesandtheirimpactsoncommoditysupplychains
Discussionpaperpreparedforthe57thSessionoftheFAOAdvisoryCommitteeonSustainableForest-basedIndustries,22June2016
byTillNeeffandThaísLinhares-Juvenal
FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations
Rome,2017
![Page 4: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
![Page 5: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
iii
Contents
Acknowledgments..................................................................................................................................v
Acronyms...............................................................................................................................................vi
1 Introduction....................................................................................................................................1
2 Definitionsandtheirimplicationsforthefeasibilityandstringencyofzero-deforestationcommitments..................................................................................................................................4
3 Certification:acommonproxyforeliminatingdeforestation.........................................................8
4 Supply-chainintegrationinzero-deforestationefforts.................................................................13
5 Commoditiesandcompanies........................................................................................................17
6 Ensuringlong-termpositiveimpacts.............................................................................................22
7 Fromthesupplychaintothelandscapelevel...............................................................................24
8 Conclusions...................................................................................................................................27
9 Implicationsofzero-deforestationinitiativesforforestproductvaluechains.............................29
10 Literature.......................................................................................................................................31
Annex1:Majorcertificationschemesandtheirprincipleswithrelevancetodeforestation.............37
Annex2:Chain-of-custodyapproachesforpalmoil...........................................................................39
Figures1 Azero-deforestationtimeline........................................................................................................32 Overviewofdefinitionalissuesinseveralzero-deforestationinitiatives.......................................53 Voluntarycertificationschemesforforest-riskcommoditiesanddeforestation..........................84 Supplyofcertifiedforest-riskcommoditiesversusproxyofdemandfrommajorcompanieswith
zero-deforestationcommitments................................................................................................105 Simplifiedresultshierarchyofzero-deforestationinitiatives,includingindicatorsattheoutput
andoutcomelevels......................................................................................................................116 Idealizedsupplychainandotheractorsinzero-deforestationinitiatives...................................137 Actorsdirectlyorindirectlyinvolvedinzero-deforestationinitiativesalongsupplychainsfor
agriculturalandforestryproducts................................................................................................158 Growthratesofforest-riskcommoditiesinmajorproducercountriesin2000–2015(5-year
movingaverage)...........................................................................................................................179 Productiontimeseriesofforest-riskcommoditiesinmajortropicalproducercountries...........1810 Estimatesofthecontributionofsmallproducerstotheproductionofforest-risk
commodities.................................................................................................................................2311 Contributionsandbenefitsofproducers,commoditybuyers,financialinstitutionsandlocal
governmentfromjurisdictionalzero-deforestationinitiatives....................................................2512 Breakdownofregularproducers,certifiedproducersandproducersinlow-riskjurisdictionsto
regulatoryagencies,commoditybuyersandfinanceinstitutions...............................................26Tables1 Parametersintheforestdefinitionsusedinseveralinternationalcontexts.................................62 Forest-riskcommoditiesandthezero-deforestationmovement................................................19
![Page 6: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
iv
![Page 7: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
v
Acknowledgments
Thevaluablecontributionstothispaperbythefollowingpersonsaregratefullyacknowledged:themembersoftheSteeringCommitteeoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonSustainableForest-basedIndustries,ChrisElliott(ClimateandLandUseAlliance),DanielZarin(ClimateandLandUseAlliance),EricSwanson(ForestTrends),FrancescoTubiello(FAO),GaryDunning(TheForestsDialogue),HansSmit(SNV),HeinervonLüpke(GIZ),JukkaTissari(FAO),MarcoBoscolo(FAO),MaríaJoséSánzSanchez(FAO),MatthewReddy(WorldBusinessCouncilforSustainableDevelopment),MorizVohrer(GoldStandard),RichardMcNally(SNV),RodneyTaylor(WWF),SusanBraatz(FAO),ThaísLinhares-Juvenal(FAO)andUtaJungermann(WorldBusinessCouncilforSustainableDevelopment).
![Page 8: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
vi
Acronyms
ACSFI AdvisoryCommitteeonSustainableForest-basedIndustriesEU EuropeanUnionFAO FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNationsFLEGT ForestLawEnforcement,GovernanceandTradeFSC ForestStewardshipCouncilGEF GlobalEnvironmentFundGRSB GlobalRoundtableforSustainableBeefINDC IntendednationallydeterminedcontributionNGO non-governmentalorganizationPEFC ProgrammefortheEndorsementofForestCertificationREDD+ ReducingEmissionsfromDeforestationandForestDegradationRSPO RoundtableonSustainablePalmOilRTRS RoundTableonResponsibleSoyUS UnitedStatesofAmerica
![Page 9: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
1
1 Introduction
Inviewofthestillalarminglyhighratesofdeforestationinmanypartsoftheworld,theglobalcommunityisincreasinglytakingactiontoreducethelossofforests.The2014NewYorkDeclarationonForestsaimstohalvenaturalforestlossgloballyby2020andreachzeronaturalforestlossby2030[1].Sincethen,theinternationalcommunityhasmadeavailablesignificantfundsforworkonzerodeforestation,especiallythroughtheGlobalEnvironmentFund(GEF)[3].Themostsignificantcommitment,however,istheSustainableDevelopmentGoals,adoptedin2015,inwhichcountriescommit,amongotherthings,tohaltingdeforestationby2020.OtherimportantrelevantprocessesincludeForestLawEnforcement,GovernanceandTrade(FLEGT),theprocessesaroundtheConventiononBiologicalDiversityandtheUnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange,includingREDD+(amechanismforreducingemissionsfromdeforestationandforestdegradation)andtheintendednationallydeterminedcontributions(INDCs)oftheParisAgreementonclimatechange.Alltheseinitiatives,inonewayoranother,setgoalsandtargetsforgovernmentstoreducedeforestation.
Inaddition,anincreasingnumberofprivatecompaniesarevoluntarilycommittingtoeliminatingdeforestationfromtheirsupplychains.Companieshavelongbeenworkingtointegratesupplychains,notonlywithaviewtoimprovingprocurementefficiencybutalsotoenhanceenvironmentalandsocialimpacts,forexamplethroughresponsiblesourcingandgreensupplychains[4].Similarly,companieshavelongbeenengagedinvoluntarycertificationschemes,suchasthoseoftheForestStewardshipCouncil(FSC),theRoundtableonSustainablePalmOil(RSPO),Naturland,andRainforestAllianceCertifiedCoffeeFarms(seeAnnex1);thezero-deforestationmovementleansinasimilardirection[5].Certificationandprocurementstandardsareakeystrategyforcompaniestoeliminatedeforestationfromtheirsupplychains,particularlyfordownstreamcompanies,whichaccountformostzero-deforestationpledges[6].
Companiesactbecausefiercecampaigningbynon-governmentalorganizations(NGOs)hascreatedreputationalrisksinbeingassociatedwithdeforestation[7–10].Moreover,thereareregulatoryrisksinworkingwithlandusesbecausethepolicyenvironmentispronetointerferencefromgovernmentsaimingtoimplementnationalorinternationaltargets[7,8,10,11].Inaddition,usingnaturalresourcessustainablymayreducetheoperationalriskofeventuallydepletingtheproductionbase[7,8,10,12].
Government-ledmomentumaroundINDCsandREDD+providesacontextforcompanies’zero-deforestationwork.Definitions,standardsandmechanismsfortarget-settingareimportantissuesforeffortstoreducedeforestation,bothatthenationalscaleandforsupplychains[13].CompanyactiontoreducedeforestationultimatelycontributestogovernmenttargetsunderINDCsandREDD+.Bythesametoken,somegovernmentalpoliciesandmeasurestoreducedeforestationmaypromptchangestosupplychains.Inmostplaces,however,theprivateandpublicsectorscontinuetoworkindependently,andalostopportunityforbringingzerodeforestationtoscalehasbeenwidelydiagnosed[11,14–16].Thispaperchieflylooksintocompanies’approachestoeliminatingdeforestationfromtheirsupplychains.
Zero-deforestationpledgeshavereachedanimpressivescale.TheNewYorkDeclarationonForestswasendorsedby36nationalgovernments,53companiesand54civil-societyorganizations.TheConsumerGoodsForumrepresents400companiesacross70countries,whichcollectivelyemploynearly10millionpeopleandhavesalesofmorethanUS$3trillion.ItsTropicalForestAlliance2020includesmanyofthesamecompanies,aswellasgovernmentsandcivil-societyorganizations.The
![Page 10: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2
SoftCommoditiesCompact(betweentheBankingandEnvironmentInitiative,WWFandtheConsumerGoodsForum)accountsforapproximately50%ofglobaltradefinance.
Despitemuchearlyaction,however,itremainstobeseenwhethercompaniescanmeettheirpledgesandwhetherzerodeforestationcancreateimpactontheground.Muchmomentumhasbeenbuilt,andhundredsofcompanieshavemadepledges(Figure1).Nevertheless,thereislittleinformationonwhichtojudgeprogressbecausemanypledgesreferto2020or2030onlyandmanycompanieshavenotyetreportedpubliclyonprogress[2,6,20].Evenifcompaniescomplywiththeircommitments,large-scaleimpactonthegroundmayrequiretheengagementofgovernmentstosafeguardandmainstreamprogress[8].Todate,positiveexamplesofeffectivecollaborationbetweencompaniesandgovernmentsarefew(andlargelylimitedtoonecountry–Brazil)[11,15].Thedownsidetothetremendousmomentumaroundzerodeforestationistheriskofawfulfuturedisappointmentifthemovementfailstodeliverprogress.
Forthezero-deforestationmovementtosucceed,clarityisneededonthezero-deforestationconceptandthebestwaytooperationalizepledgesandbringzerodeforestationtoscale.Thisreportaimstoprovideinsightintothecurrentmomentumaroundzero-deforestationinitiativesanditsimplicationsfortheforestindustries.Itfollowsuponarecommendationfromthe56thsessionoftheAdvisoryCommitteeonSustainableForest-basedIndustries(ACSFI)requestingFAOto“helpfacilitateunderstandingandagreementondefinitionof‘deforestation-free’andimplicationsforforestproductsvaluechains”[21].
Chapter2ofthereportshowsthatthereisconfusiononthedefinitionsthatunderliezero-deforestationcommitments.Chapter3explainsthatprocuringcertifiedcommoditiesisthecommonproxyforeliminatingdeforestationfromsupplychains,despiteconcernsaboutitsadequacy.Chapter4discusseshowzerodeforestationaffectscompaniesacrossthesupplychains,andhowprivate-sectorplayersnonethelessdonotalwayscoordinateeffectively.Chapter5setsouthowthezero-deforestationmovementhasfocusedoncertaincommoditiesandgeographiesoverothers.Chapter6describeshowcomprehensivesupply-chainmanagementmakeszerodeforestationfeasibleandsafeguardsitsbenefits.Chapter7discussesthepotentialcontributionofgovernmentsinbringingzerodeforestationtothelandscapescale,andChapter8drawsconclusionsandChapter9describestheimplicationsofzero-deforestationinitiativesforforestproductvaluechains.
![Page 11: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
3
Figure1:Azero-deforestationtimeline
40mhectaresFSCcertified
RoundTableonSustainablePalmOil
KyotoProtocolentersintoforce
"EatingUptheAmazon"
BrazilianSoyMoratorium
RoundTableonResponsibleSoy
200mhectaresPEFCcertified
"CookingtheClimate"
WWF'scallforzeronetdeforestation
UN-REDDandFCPFoperational
FirstRSPOcertification
"AHoradaConta"
"Slaughtering theAmazon"
BrazilianCattleAgreement
"CaughtRedHanded"
Nestlé
EquatorPrinciples
"PulpingthePlanet"
Walmart
ConsumerGoodsForumDeforestationResolution
GoldenAgriResources
FirstRTRSCertification
"ToyingwithExtinction"
"Don'tFlushTigerForests"
"TheRAMINPaperTrail"
"JunkingtheJungle"
"CombateàDevastaçãoAmbientaleTrabalhoEscravonaProduçãodoFerroe
doAço"
"FryingtheForests"
GlobalRoundtableforSustainableBeef
APP
FAO'sZeroDeforestationChallenge
TropicalForestAlliance2020
SoftCommoditiesCompact
Wilmar
Unilever
L'Oréal
"LicencetoLaunder"
Danone
Cargill
NewYorkDeclarationonForests
April
CountriessubmitINDCsforParisconference
03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
![Page 12: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
4
2 Definitionsandtheirimplicationsforthefeasibilityandstringencyofzero-deforestationcommitments
‘Deforestationfree’,‘zerodeforestation,’‘zerogrossdeforestation’and‘zeronetdeforestation’arerelatedbutdistinctterms,andtheyareoftenusedinterchangeably[22].Imprecisedefinitionscreateconfusionbetweenthosewhocommittopledgesandthosewhoaimtoassessorimplementthem.Theterminology,therefore,hasmassiveimplicationsforthestringencyandfeasibilityofpledges[22,23].Ultimately,alackofclear,agreeddefinitionscompromisesthezero-deforestationmovement[11,14,22].
‘Deforestationfree’and‘zerodeforestation’areinherentlyambiguousterms.Theyimplyamodifiertotheworddeforestation,andcontextisneededtounderstandwhethertheyreferto‘gross,’‘net,’both,orsomethingelse[13].
‘Zerogrossdeforestation’meansanendtotheconversionofallexistingforestlandandthereforegivesnoweighttocompensatorygainsinforestcovermadeelsewhere.Thisdefinitionstillrequiresclarificationonwhat‘forest’isintermsofitsreferencetimeframe,referencearea,origin,legality,morphology,structure,ecosystemvalueandothercharacteristics.Nonetheless,TheForestsDialoguecalledit“theleastambiguousterm”andinterpretedseveralcompanycommitmentstorefertogrossdeforestation[13].BenchmarkdataonAmazondeforestationarebasedmostlyoninformationfromBrazil’sNationalInstituteforSpaceResearch,whichpublishesestimatesofgrossdeforestation[22].
‘Zeronetdeforestation’meansnochangetothetotalforestedarea,andthereforenewforestscompensateforconvertedforests.Inunderstanding‘zeronetdeforestation’,thedefinitionof‘forests’isanimportantparameterthatneedsspecification.Thecruxofthedefinitionisthekindsofnewforeststhataregoodenoughtocompensateforlostforestareaand,hence,whatis‘acceptabledeforestation’.Forexample,plantationsreplacingnaturalforestsmightormightnotcountbecausetheyarelessbiodiverseandstorelesscarbon.Deforestationthatoccurredalongtimeagomightormightnotbepermissible.Thesefinerpointsareimportantforsecuringtheenvironmentalbenefitsofzeronetdeforestation;inadditiontoWWF,theBankingandEnvironmentInitiativeandtheConsumerGoodsForumusethisconcept[19].GlobalbenchmarkdataonforesttrendsarebasedmostlyonFAO’sGlobalForestResourcesAssessment,whichusesnetdeforestationasakeyvariable[24].
Bothzerogrossdeforestationandzeronetdeforestationhavereceivedsubstantialcriticism.Criticismofzerogrossdeforestationispremisedonthefactthatitdoesnotallowflexibilityinland-useplanning[13].Forestswouldneedtoremain,irrespectiveofdevelopmentneeds,whichareoftengreatestamongforest-dwellingindigenouspeoplesandlocalcommunities.Economicimperativesmighttrumpinflexiblezerogrossdeforestationcommitments[11].Critiquesofzeronetdeforestationfocusonthefactthatreplacementforestsareoftennotequivalenttoclearedvegetationintermsoftheirconservationvalue,carbonstockorotherecosystemservices[11,13].
Zeronetdeforestationenjoysmostmomentumamongrecentpledges,anditisanestablishedconcept.FAO’sForestResourcesAssessmenttakesintoaccountgainsinforestcoverfromtimberplantationsincalculatingnetdeforestation[24].TheConsumerGoodsForum,itsTropicalForestAlliance2020,andtheSoftCommoditiesCompactallformulatetheirtargetsintermsofzeronetdeforestation.TheForestsDialogueconcludesthat“theeconomicheftofthe[ConsumerGoodsForum](whosemembercompanieshavecombinedsalesofover$3.3trillion),WWF’ssizeand
![Page 13: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
5
reputation,andthesupportof67countriesplustheEuropeanCommissionmakeastrongcasethatzeronetdeforestationisthevariationwiththemostbacking.”[13]
Althoughthedistinctionbetweennetandgrossdeforestationhasreceivedmuchattention,otherdefinitionalaspectsmaybeequallyimportant(Figure2).Mostofthezerodeforestationpledgestreatedinthispaperrefertosupplychains,butexpectedengagementfromgovernmentsreferstothelandscapelevel(seechapter7).Althoughfullyeliminatingalldeforestationisclosetoimpossible,inpractice,verificationschemesprovidedetailsonwhatis‘acceptabledeforestation’.
Figure2:Overviewofdefinitionalissuesinseveralzero-deforestationinitiatives
Thezero-deforestationpledgesofcompanieslargelyrefertoindividualcommoditieswithintheirsupplychains,nottobroaderlandscapes.WWF’soriginalproposalforzeronetdeforestationreferstoalandscapelevel[25].ThroughtheConsumerGoodsForum,companieshavealignedthemselveswithWWFbut,crucially,theirpledgesareoperationalizedatadifferentreferencescale,namelysupplychains[17,26–28].TheBrazilianCattleAgreement,theBrazilianSoyMoratoriumandtheIndonesiaPalmOilPledgestandoutbecausetheirbroadparticipationalmostequatestofullcoverage[12].Mostly,however,companiespickindividualforest-riskcommoditiestotackle[8,29,30].Dependingonthereferencescale,pledgescanhaveverydifferentimplicationsforthepotentialtoshiftpressuretodifferentgeographicalareas,differentcompaniesanddifferentcommodities[11,12].Therehavebeenfrequentcallsforzero-deforestationinitiativestoworkwithgovernmentsandatthelandscapelevel[5,8,15,31].
WWF
ConsumerGoodsForum
BrazilianCafleAgreement,Brazilian
SoyMoratorium
NewYorkDeclarahononForests
HighCarbonStockApproach
Netdeforestahonversusgross
deforestahon?
Netdeforestahon
Netdeforestahon
Grossdeforestahon
Netdeforestahon
Grossdeforestahon
Supplychainorjurisdichonallevel?
Originallyjurisdichonal,butinterestedinsupply
chainstoo
Supplychains
Supplychains,withverybroadcoverage
Jurisdichonallevel
Supplychains
Whatis‘acceptabledeforestahon’?
Forestsshouldmaintain“thenet
quanhty,qualityandcarbondensity”
Determinedbyprocurement
guidelines,drawingoncerhficahon
Vegetahonwithcertaintreecovercharacterishcsisoff
limits
Regenerahonwouldcompensateformatureforestloss
Vegetahonabovecertaincarbonstockthresholdisofflimits
![Page 14: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
6
AccordingtoWWF,newforestsshouldonlybecountedwheretheymaintain“thenetquantity,qualityandcarbondensity”oftheconvertedforests[33].Cut-offdates(forwhenlandwasoriginallyforested)determinewhenitispermissibletoincludespecificlandsasnewforests[34].Whetherplantedforestsarealsotobecountedasforestsdetermineswhethercuttingdownprimaryforesttoestablishplantationsispermissible[18].TimberlegalityisakeyissueinUnitedStatesofAmerica(US)andEuropeanUnion(EU)timberimportregulations,andtherearededicatedcertificationstandards[18].Foreststructureanditscarbonstoragehasreceivedattentionasausefulproxyandbasisfornew‘highcarbonstock’standardsdevelopedspecificallyforzerodeforestation[11,35–37].Broadagreementseemstoexistthatforestswithhighconservationvalueareoff-limitsforconversionunderzero-deforestationinitiatives[38–40].
Technically,muchoftheconfusionrelatestothedefinitionof‘forest’,aswellastothereferencetimeframe,referencearea,origin,legality,structure,andconservationvalue.Theuseofdifferentforestdefinitionsaccordingtocontextiscommonplace(Table1);the‘right’definitionforzerodeforestationisunderdiscussion.Itsorigin,legality,structureandconservationvaluedetermines‘acceptabledeforestation’.Muchattentionisdedicatedtowhetherpledgesrefertocompanyareasortobroaderlandscapesinwhichcompaniesoperatebecausetherecouldotherwisebeopportunitiestocherry-pickareas[11].Similarly,thetimepointofconversionisakeyparameterinmostcertificationstandardsandmaydeterminewhethertheproductionbaseofindividualcompaniescanorcannotcomply[34].Theseandotherhighlytechnicalissuesallhaveabearingonwhatzerodeforestationmeans.
Table1:Parametersintheforestdefinitionsusedinseveralinternationalcontexts
Parameter UnitedNationsFrameworkConventiononClimateChange
ConventiononBiologicalDiversity
FAO’sForestResourcesAssessment
Minimumarea 0.05-1.0ha 0.5ha 0.5haMinimumheight 2–5m 5m 5mMinimumcrowncover
10–30% 10% 10%
Minimumtimesinceconversion
Notavailable Notavailable ~10years
Minimumstripwidth
Notavailable Notavailable 20m
Otherparameterscoveredindefinition
Youngstands,temporarilyunstockedareas
Youngstands,non-forestlanduses
Youngstands,non-forestlanduses,temporarilyunstockedareas,agroforestry
Source:basedon[41]
Procuringcertifiedgoodsisaconvenientwayformanufacturersandretailersfarfromproductionsystemstoimplementzero-deforestationpledges[2,6].Insuchcases,thedefinitionsunderlyingcertificationschemesindirectlyformthebasisforcompanies’zero-deforestationpledges.Somezero-deforestationpledgesarealsobasedonbespokeperformanceindicatorsdirectlyreflectingdeforestationprocesses,particularlyifproducersorprocessorstakeonpledgesthemselves.
Contentiousdefinitionsrevealthat‘zerodeforestation’meansdifferentthingstodifferentactors.WWFapproacheszerodeforestationbylooking,quitebroadly,atthenetquantity,qualityandcarbondensityofforests,recognizingthattheconversionofforestsatonesitemaycontributetothesustainabledevelopmentandconservationofthewiderlandscape[33].Greenpeaceisdevelopingitsownapproachtoverifyingzero-deforestationcommitments,usinghighcarbonstock
![Page 15: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
7
incombinationwithseveralotherindicators[35,42].ForbothWWFandGreenpeace,theprotectionofbiodiversityisakeyconcern,asiseffectivecollaborationwithlocalcommunities.TheConsumerGoodsForumhasdrawnupprocurementguidelinesthateffectivelyequatezerodeforestationwiththeprocurementofcertifiedproducts[26–28].Infact,ForestTrendsdiagnoses,while“companiesmightbeinfluencedbythesamecampaignsandstakeholders,notwocommitmentsarealike”[6].
Althoughitisconceptuallyappealing,asingleuniversaldefinitionofdeforestationmaybeimpractical.Withregardstosustainableforestmanagement,FAOhascalledagloballyagreeddefinition“impracticalbeyondaverygenerallevelbecauseofthehugediversityofforesttypes,conditionsandsocioeconomiccontextsworldwide”;onlylimitedagreementcouldbereachedintheNon-legallyBindingInstrumentonAllTypesofForestsoftheUnitedNationsForumonForests[43,44].Althoughagreementonuniversaldefinitionsmaynotbedesirable,moretransparentanddetaileddefinitionscouldaddclaritytozero-deforestationpledges.
Keypoints
• Thereisconfusionondefinitions,withmajorimplicationsforthefeasibilityandstringencyofzero-deforestationcommitments.
• Pledgesrefertonetorgrossdeforestation,tosupplychainsorlandscapes,andtosomelevelof‘acceptabledeforestation’.
• Companies’zero-deforestationinitiativesusuallyrefertotheirsupplychains,whilegovernmentsoftenlookatthelandscapelevel.
• Mostmomentumisaroundzeronetdeforestation,whichmeansnochangetothetotalforestedarea,withnewforestscompensatingforconvertedforests.
• Operationalizingzeronetdeforestationrequiresdefining‘acceptabledeforestation’–thatis,whattypesofstandingforestsareoff-limitsforconversion,andwhattypesofnewforestscancompensateforconvertedforests.
• Toverifyzero-deforestationcommitments,companypledgesoftenrefertostandardagriculturalandforestcertificationschemes,whichimplydefinitionsof‘acceptabledeforestation’.
![Page 16: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
8
3 Certification:acommonproxyforeliminatingdeforestation
Certificationisimportantevidencefortheverificationofzero-deforestationpledges,withForestTrendsfindingthatfourinfivepledgesrelyoncertification[6].TheConsumerGoodsForumpublishedprocurementguidelinesforsoy,pulp,paperandpacking,andpalmoil,whichidentifyseveralcertificationschemesassufficienttoverifyalowriskofcontributingtodeforestationandthereforewhichhelp“toachievezeronetdeforestation”[26–28].
Voluntarycertificationschemesforforest-riskcommoditiesaddressdeforestation(Figure3).AreviewofeightmajoragriculturecertificationschemesbytheRainforestAlliancefoundthatallschemesincludedcriteriaprohibitingforestclearance[5,34],thekeydifferencesrelatingtothetypesofforestsaffected,thecut-offdatefornon-conversion,andtherequirementsaroundremedialmeasures.TheForestsDialoguelookedatthreemajorforestcertificationschemesaspossibleevidenceofno-deforestationandconcludedthatallthestandardsspoketotheissueoftimberfromforestlandconvertedtoothervegetation[13].
Figure3:Voluntarycertificationschemesforforest-riskcommoditiesanddeforestation
TheFSC’sForestManagementCertificationprohibitsforestconversioninallbutexceptionalcases.Itprohibitstheconversionofnaturalforeststoplantationsandofnaturalforestsorplantationstootherlanduses.Thereareexceptionsiftheactivityaffectsaverylimitedportionofthearea,willproduceclearlong-termconservationbenefits,anddoesnotdirectlyorindirectlycompromisehighconservationvaluesError!Referencesourcenotfound.[38].
TheProgrammefortheEndorsementofForestCertification(PEFC)endorsesnationalstandardsthatregulateforestconversion.Itdoesnotprohibittheconversionofnaturalforeststoplantationsbutrequiresconversiontotakeplaceonlyunder“justifiedcircumstances”,includinglegalcompliance,theabsenceofnegativeenvironmentalimpacts,smallscale,andpositivesocioeconomicimpacts.Forestplantationscreatedbefore2011areeligibleregardlessofsuchcircumstances.ThePEFCisameta-standardthatsetsoutrequirementsfornationalcertificationschemes,whichmayindividuallygobeyondtheminimumrequirements.AmongseveralnationalcertificationschemesinNorthAmericaandEurope,thePEFCalsoendorsestheBrazilianForestCertificationProgramme,theIndonesianForestryCertificationCooperationandotherdeveloping-countryschemes[45].
RSPO• prohibitsconversionofprimaryforestsbutnotofotherforesttypes
RTRS• prohibitstheconversionofbothprimaryandsecondaryforests,usinganarrowdefinihonofforests
FSC• prohibitsforestconversioninallbutexcephonalcases
PEFC• endorsesnahonalstandardsthatregulateforestconversion
GRSB• callsfortheprotechonofnahveforestsbutdoesnotissuecerhficates
![Page 17: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
9
RSPOcertificationprohibitstheconversionofprimaryforestsbutnotofotherforesttypes.Plantationscannotbeestablishedonlandswithprimaryforests,butsecondaryordegradedforestscanbeconvertedtoplantationsaslongasplantingsleaveouthigh-conservation-valueareasandavoidpeatlands[39].
CertificationbytheRoundTableonResponsibleSoy(RTRS)prohibitstheconversionofbothprimaryandsecondaryforests,usinganarrowdefinitionofforests.Theschemeexcludestheconversionof‘native’forests,includingbothprimaryforestanddisturbedandsecondaryvegetation.Anyvegetationlessthan10metresinheightcanbeconvertedaslongasareaswithhighconservationvalueareavoided[40].Mostcountrieshavemuchlowerthresholdsfortheheightof‘forests’;thehighthresholdhereensuresthatsoycanbegrownwithlittlerestrictioninwoodlands(e.g.theBraziliancerradowoodlands).
TheGlobalRoundtableforSustainableBeef(GRSB)’sprinciplesandcriteriacallfortheprotectionofnativeforests.Theschemedoesnotincludeindicatorsormeansofverification,whichwouldberequiredtounderliecertification.Rather,theintentionisthatsuchindicatorsandrelatedpracticeswouldbedevelopedthroughregionallybasedprocesses.
Aprerequisitefortradingcertifiedproductsisthetraceabilityofthechainofcustody.TheFSC,PEFC,RSPOandRTRSstandardsallcomewithseparatechain-of-custodycertificationstandards,drawingontypicalapproachesfortracingproductsthroughcomplexsupplychains,suchasbook-and-claim,massbalance,segregated,andidentitypreserved(Annex2).
Notallcertificationstandardsareequallyrelevanttozerodeforestation.TheguidelinesoftheConsumerGoodsForumpointtothemajorcertificationstandards(FSC,PEFC,RSPO,etc.)andlesser-knownstandardsalikeassufficientmeansofverificationasiftheyallhadlargelysimilarrequirements.Theuseofavarietyofcertificatesdefeatstheideaofauniversallyapplicableproductionstandard,however.Eventhewell-knownPEFChasattractedsubstantialcriticismfromNGOsbyendorsingtheIndonesianForestCertificationCooperation.WWFquestionedthedecisionandraisedconcernsinanopenletter[46].Morebluntly,Greenpeacestatedthat“anysustainabilityclaimsbasedonthesecertificationschemesisindustry‘greenwash’”[47].Notdiscriminatingbetweendifferentcertificationstandardsforforest-riskcommoditiesultimatelyunderminesthecredibilityofzerodeforestationasawhole.
Companiesusethreecommonoptionsforimplementingzerodeforestation:certifiedprocurement,directareamonitoring,andprocurementfromlow-riskjurisdictions.Certifiedprocurementisconceptuallysimple,andmostcompaniesconsidercertificationasgoodevidenceofzerodeforestation.Procurementfromlow-riskjurisdictionsmayprovidelessassuranceofzerodeforestation,butithasrecentlygainedmomentumasameansofverifyingcompliancewithzerodeforestation.Directareamonitoringoffersmostcontrolovertheimpactsofproductiononforestcover.
![Page 18: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
10
Figure4:Supplyofcertifiedforest-riskcommoditiesversusproxyofdemandfrommajorcompanieswithzero-deforestationcommitments
SeeTable2(page23)fordetailsoncalculationsandsources.
Procurementfromlow-riskjurisdictionsallowscompaniestoearmarkproductsaszero-deforestationcompliantbasedonorigin.Clearly,thelevelofzero-deforestationassuranceislowerthanwhenrelyingonindividualcompany-levelcertification.Nevertheless,subnationaljurisdictionsareincreasinglyengagedinpursuingenvironmentaltargets,includingzerodeforestation,andsomeNGOsprovideschemestoverifysuchperformance,akintocertificates[48–50].Suchpreferentialsourcingfromlow-riskjurisdictionscloselylinkswithgovernmentalzero-deforestationaction.ItisconceptuallysimilartoNorthAmericanandEuropeangovernmentalactiontoregulatetropicaltimberimportsundertheEUFLEGTActionPlan,theEUTimberRegulationandtheUSLaceyAct[51–53].
Somezero-deforestationinitiativesmonitorproductionareasdirectly.TheIndonesiaPalmOilPledge,forexample,committedagroupofcompaniestoavoidinghigh-carbon-stockareasfornewplantations[54].Althoughdetailsoftheverificationschemeareunderelaboration,theyarelikelytorelyonareamonitoring.Similarly,agroupofmanufacturersandtheirbusinessassociationssetuptheBrazilianSoyMoratoriumandtheBrazilianCattleAgreement[55,56].ParticipantsagreedtoonlypurchasefromproducerswhodidnotdeforestlandsinAmazonia,andthepurpose-designedverificationschemereliedonthecollectionofremotesensingdata.Usingjustoneperformanceindicator–theeligibilityoflandsasperdefinedcut-offdates–madeverificationmuchsimpler,moreunambiguousandmoreencompassingthanrelyingoncertificationschemes.Arguably,itwasalsomuchcruderandsidesteppedtheneedtoimprovethebusinesspracticesofproducers.
ApilotinitiativebyGoldenAgriResources,GreenpeaceandTheForestTrusthasproposedtheconceptofhigh-carbon-stockforeststodeterminewhereforestsmustbepreservedorcangivewaytoplantations[35,37,42].High-carbon-stockforestreferstovegetationwithcarbonstorageaboveacertainthreshold(e.g.35metrictonnesperhectare)[37].TheSustainablePalmOilManifestoandtheIndonesiaPalmOilPledgehavebothtakenupthebasicconcept,committingtheirsignatoriestoprotectinghigh-carbon-stockforests[36,57.]Arguably,monitoringhigh-carbon-stockforesttrackstheoutcomesofcompanies’activitiesmoreimmediatelythancouldbedonebyrelyingoncertificationorotheroutputsofzero-deforestationpledges(Figure5).
15%1%
28%
59% 20% 62% 26%
68% 24% 11%
35% 51% 35%
Palmoil Soya Timber,pulp&paper
Beef
Supply:shareofglobalproductionwithmajorcerti fication
Demand:shareofmajorcompanieswithdedicatedsourcingpolicy
ni l
ni lSupply:shareofglobalproductionwithdirectmonitoring
Supply:shareofglobalproductioninlowriskjurisdictions
ni l
![Page 19: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
11
Agriculturalandforestmanagementcertificationstandardsarenotinallcasesconsideredsufficientlystricttoeffectivelyprohibitdeforestation[11,13,58].Ratherthanbypassingexistingstandards,though,thereseemstobemomentumtobuildonexistingstandards,suchasthroughtheadditionofcomponentsaddressingzerodeforestation[32].Commontraceabilitysystemsinvolvingchain-of-custodycertificationarenotalwaysconsideredsufficientlyrobust[5].Mostimportantly,somefeelthatachievingpositiveoutcomesandsecuringlong-termsocietalimpactsrequiresapproachesgoingbeyondthecompanylevel[5,16,31].Workisongoingtodrawupnewschemesforascertainingzerodeforestationatthelandscapelevel[48,49].
Zero-deforestationinitiativesgenerateresultsasoutputs,outcomesandimpacts[12].Compliancewithcertificationstandardsisinitselfausefuloutputofzero-deforestationefforts.Conceptually,however,sucheffortstargetimprovementstocompanybusinesspracticesasthezero-deforestationoutcome.Evenbeyondthebusinesspracticesofparticipatingcompanies,zero-deforestationinitiativesshouldachievelong-termsocietalimpacts.NGOsoffersupportwithcertificationandperformanceindicators,notleastbyparticipatingintheroundtablesthatdesignthestandards[38–40].NGOsalsoproposetoolsandapproachesforcompanieswishingtoimprovebusinesspractices,suchaswithrespecttoimprovedtraceability[5],directmonitoring[35],legality[59,60]andeventheprovisionofincentivepayments[61].LeadingNGOshighlighttheneedtoengagesmallproducers[5,14,16]andgovernments[7,14,16],andworkingatthelandscapelevel[5,31]inordertosafeguardthepositiveimpactsofzero-deforestation(Figure5).
Figure5:Simplifiedresultshierarchyofzero-deforestationinitiatives,includingindicatorsattheoutputandoutcomelevels
Regardlessofthespecificsofindividualperformanceindicators,companiestakeonpledgestheycanactuallyfulfil,andtheytendtoavoiddisruptingtheirbusinesspractices.Forexample,theRTRSprohibitstheconversionof‘forest’vegetationwithaheightofmorethan10metres,althoughmostforestdefinitionsusemuchlowerheightthresholds(around5metres)[24,40].SoyfarmingoccursfrequentlyintheBraziliancerradowoodlands,whichmightbelargelyoff-limitsundertypicalforestdefinitions.TheConsumerGoodsForum’sprocurementguidelinesforpulp,paperandpackagingforpalmoilandsoyrelylargelyonthird-partycertificationtoverifycompliancewithzero-deforestationtargets[26–28].TheuseofmajorstandardssuchasFSC,PEFC,RSPOandRTRSforzerodeforestationhasbeenportrayedasquestionable[5,13,34,58],buttheConsumerGoodsForum’spalmoilguidelinesalsopermit“anyothercredibleindependentthird-partymechanismsthatverifylowriskofsourcesthatareunsustainableorcontributetodeforestation”[28].
Activities:NGOcampaigns,multistakeholderinitiativesandcompanies’workto
improvebusinesspractices
Output:compliancewithstandardsandcertified
procurement
Outcome:improvedbusinesspracticesof
companies
Impact:long-termsocietalbenefits
Indicator:Managementcertification
Safeguardsforcommunities Indicator
:
Traceability
Indicator:Legality
Indicator:Highcarbon
stocks
Indicator:Directareamonitoring
Indicator:to
beassessed
inhindsight
Upscalethrough
governments
Safeguardsatlandscape
scale
![Page 20: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
12
Zero-deforestationinitiativesareoftensignpostsofcompanyactionwithoutalwaysdrivingit.FortheNewYorkDeclarationonForestsitwasascertainedthatcompaniesusuallysettargetsbeforeendorsingpledges[2].TheTropicalForestsDialoguehasdescribedthewidelyvisiblezero-deforestationinitiativesas“attention-grabbing”,highlightinghowthey“makeforgreatheadlines”[11].Regardlessofsuchcriticism,theGlobalCanopyProgrammehasfoundperformanceagainstsustainabilityindicatorstobemuchbetteramongcompaniesthataremembersoftheConsumerGoodsForumthanamongotherwisecomparablecompanies,“suggestingsignificantprogressisbeingmade”[29].
Companiesneedtodeviseandcommittoprogrammesforachievingcompliancethroughoutthesupplychaintomakezerodeforestationfeasibleandsafeguarditsbenefits.Smallerproducersfacehighbarrierstoobtainingcertificationbecauseofthecostsinvolvedinimprovingbusinesspracticesandbecauseofthehighcostofthecertificationprocessitself[5].Localcommunitiesworkingwithproducers(e.g.asout-growers)arevulnerabletobeingleftbehindwhenshiftingtheirproductionsystemstocomplywiththeprocurementguidelinesofinternationaltradersbecauseprocessorsandtradersmayturnelsewhere[5,8,16].Bythesametoken,producersthatareunableorunwillingtocomplywithcertificationstandardsmayselltheirproduceintoother,less-demandingmarketsandthussidestepattemptstopromotesustainableproduction[11].Insummary,toguaranteeenvironmentalintegrityandsocialinclusion,zero-deforestationinitiativesmustnotonlyuseappropriatedefinitions,theyalsoneedtocomewithwell-designedprogrammestosafeguardenvironmentalintegrityandsocialinclusion[12].
Keypoints
• Procuringcertifiedcommoditiesisacommonproxyforeliminatingdeforestationfromsupplychains,despiteconcernsaboutitsadequacy.
• Companiescommonlyuseoneofthreeapproachesforimplementingzerodeforestation:certifiedprocurement,directareamonitoring,orprocurementfromlow-riskjurisdictions.
• Procurementfromlow-riskjurisdictionsallowscompaniestoearmarkproductsaszero-deforestationcompliant,basedonorigin.
• Somezero-deforestationinitiativesdirectlymonitorproductionareas,includingforconversiontimepointsand‘highcarbonstock’toidentify‘acceptabledeforestation’.
• Mostly,companiesconsidercertificationundertheleadingschemes,inparticularRSPO,FSC,PEFCandRTRS,asgoodevidenceofzerodeforestation,whichmayalsoincludecommoditiesoriginatingfromconvertedsecondaryforests,degradedforests,orforestswithlowheight.
• Anyoftheseimplementationapproachestozero-deforestationcommitmentsaffectsactorsalongthesupplychain.
![Page 21: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
13
4 Supply-chainintegrationinzero-deforestationefforts
Companieshavelongworkedtointegratetheirsupplychains,withtheobjective(amongothers)ofenhancingenvironmentalandsocialsustainabilityinthesourcingandprocessingofrawmaterials.Supply-chainmanagementtraditionallyfocusesontheefficiencyofsourcinginputs,aswellasoftheprocessing,manufactureanddeliveryofproducts,butheightenedconsumerawarenesshasledtodemandsthatfirmsensuresustainabilitythroughoutthesupplychain[4].Environmentalandsocialsustainabilityindicatorscanrelatetoforestsanddeforestation.TheCarbonDisclosureProjecthighlightedthatthree-quartersofreportingcompaniesrecognizedatleastonedeforestation-linkedsupply-chainrisk[10].
Mostlyitismanufacturersorretailerswhomakezero-deforestationpledges,butthishasimplicationsacrossthesupplychainfortraders,processorsandupstreamproducers[6,29],andmostoftheburdenforcomplyingwithpledgesisfoistedonproducers[11].Inafewcases,processors[55,56]andproducers[37]havemadezero-deforestationpledges.Manycompaniesareverticallyintegratedandcoverseveralsupply-chainsegments,andthesehavealsomadezero-deforestationpledges[15,29].Positioninthesupplychaindetermineshowcompaniesparticipateinthezero-deforestationmovement(Figure6,Figure7).
Manufacturersandretailerssellconsumergoodsandmakezero-deforestationpledgestominimizebusinessriskanddistinguishfromcompetitors.Thesecompanieshavemuchexposuretoconsumers,andbeingassociatedwithsustainabilityconcernsbyNGOsisthereforeamajorriskfactor[7,8].ManufacturersandretailerscollaboratewithNGOsthroughmultistakeholderplatformstoreducethisrisk.Typically,manufacturersandretailersaredownstreamfromproducersandthereforeneedtorelyontheprocurementofcertifiedproductstoimplementzero-deforestationpledges[6].
Figure6:Idealizedsupplychainandotheractorsinzero-deforestationinitiatives
Consumer-facingcompaniesdownstreaminthesupplychainstakeonmostofthepledges:accordingtoForestTrends,consumergoodsandservicesaccountfor79%ofcompanieswith
Information
ProcessorsProducers Traders Manufacturers Retailers Consumers
Governments
Production,environmentandlocalcommunities
Financialsector
Multistakeholderplatforms
Procurement
NGOs
![Page 22: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
14
pledges[6].Clearly,itispressurefromconsumersandtheirconsumptionpreferencesthatdrivesthezero-deforestationmovement.
Producersandprocessorsneedtoimprovebusinesspracticesandobtaincertificationtocomplywiththeprocurementguidelinesofdownstreamtradersandmanufacturers.ThesecompaniesdonottypicallyhaveexposuretoconsumersandarethuslessvulnerabletoNGOcriticism.Producers,however,controlthemeansofproductionandthereforecanchangethewayforestsaretreated[6].
Banksprovideoperatingcapitaltoproducers,manufacturersandretailers.Theydirectlyfinanceproducersandprocessorsandprovidetradefinanceandcorporatefinancetomanufacturersandretailers[19].Beingimplicatedwithunsustainableproductionanddeforestationisareputationalriskfactorforretailbanksbecausetheyhaveconsumerexposure;banksthereforeassessbusinesspracticesandavailablecertificationstandardswhenlending[10].Thefinancialsectorhaslongbeenconsideredakeyentrypointfortheintroductionofsustainabilitystandardsintobusinesspractices[62].
Consumersattheendofthesupplychainmaypreferlabelledproductsandavoidcompaniesassociatedwithdeforestation.Visibleproductlabelsenablethemtodistinguishbetweenretailproducts,andtheyalsoreceiveinformationfromNGOsaboutthemeansofproductioninthesupplychainsofretailersandmanufacturers.
NGOstakemultiplerolesas‘activists’,‘advisers’and‘verifiers’onzerodeforestation[15].Asactivists,NGOspressurecompanieswithunsustainablebusinesspracticesbycampaigningandkeepingconsumersinformed.OrganizationslikeGreenpeaceandWWFhavesingledoutindividualcompaniesorgroupsofcompanies,andtheircampaignshaveultimatelyledtopledges[63–68].Asadvisers,NGOshaveinitiatedandparticipatedinmultistakeholderinitiativesalongsidecompaniestodevelopzero-deforestationcommitments.NGOsupportisimportantforinitiativessuchastheConsumerGoodsForum’sTropicalForestAlliance2020andtheCarbonDisclosureProject[7,69];theyprovidetechnicalsupportandlendtheircredibilitytothezero-deforestationpledges.Asverifiers,NGOsdevelopcertificationstandardssuchasthoseoftheFSC,thePEFC,theRSPOandtheRTRS(oftentogetherwithcompanies),certifyindividualcompanies,andcollectinformationonindustrytrends[38–40,70].
Governmentshaveamandatetoprotecttheenvironmentandtheinterestsoflocalcommunities,andtheydefinetheregulatoryframeworkforcompanies.Wherethegovernanceenvironmentallowsit,therefore,governmentscouldtakeanactiveroleincoordinatinganddirectingthesustainabilityeffortsofcompanies.Regulationisalsorelevantbecausecertificationstandardsdrawamplyonlegalcompliance.Governmentsalsopursuetargetsrelatedtodeforestationunderinternationalcommitments.TheyfundsomeoftheNGOsandmultistakeholderinitiativesworkingoncertificationandzerodeforestation.
Localcommunitiesareconnectedtosupplychains,eitherdirectlyasdependentorindependentsmallproducers,orindirectlyasneighboursofandlabourforlargeproducers.Whencompaniesupdatetheirbusinesspractices,localcommunitiescouldeasilybecutoutbecausedirectcollaborationinvolvesmuchmanagementeffort.Certificationstandardshaveprovisionsforlocalcommunities,andNGOsalsomonitorthesocialimpactsofproduction.
![Page 23: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
15
Figure7:Actorsdirectlyorindirectlyinvolvedinzero-deforestationinitiativesalongsupplychainsforagriculturalandforestryproducts
Thenatureofthezero-deforestationpledgedependsonwherecompaniesareinthesupplychain.Producersandprocessors(orverticallyintegratedcompanies)controlproductionoratleasthavedirectrelationshipswithproducers.Theycanthereforeverifycompliancewithzero-deforestationpledgesusingbespokeperformanceindicatorsinsteadofuniversallyrelyingoncertification.Thehigh-carbon-stockapproach,theIndonesiaPalmOilPledge,theSustainablePalmOilManifesto,theCattleAgreementandtheBrazilianSoyMoratoriumwereall(co-)proposedbyproducers,processorsorverticallyintegratedcompanies[37,55–57].
TheprocurementguidelinesoftheConsumerGoodsForum(mainlycomposedofmanufacturersandretailers)proposeacombinationofcertificationstandardsassufficientevidenceofcompliancewithitszero-deforestationprinciples[26,27],andtheprocurementguidelinesofindividualcompaniesareoftenstructuredsimilarly[71–73].Suchdownstreamcompaniescannotdevisenewperformanceindicatorsforzerodeforestationbecausetheyarefarremovedfromproductionsystemsandoftenhavelittleinformationontheirupstreamsuppliers.Theymustthereforerelyonresponsibleprocurementandtheuseofcertification.
Zero-deforestationmultistakeholderplatformshelpcompaniessetcommonbenchmarkswiththecompetition.Accordingtoonecount,96%oftheglobaltradeinpalmoiliscoveredbyzero-
Producersandprocessors• Striveforsustainablebusinessprachcesandobtaincerhficahon• Selltheirproducetotradersormanufacturers• Complywiththeprocurementguidelinesoftradersandmanufacturers,includingthroughcerhficahon
Traders,manufacturersandretailers• Settheirzero-deforestahonpledgesandparhcipateinmulhstakeholderinihahves• Purchasetheirrawmaterialsfromproducers• Sellconsumergoodstoconsumers
Financialsector• Financestheachvihesofproducers,processors,traders,manufacturersandretailers• Assessesbusinessprachcesofcompaniestotakefinancingdecisions• Hasexposuretoconsumersthroughretailbankingnetworks
Consumers• Purchaseconsumergoods• Mayprefercerhfiedproducts• MayavoidcompaniestaintedbyNGOs• FundNGOsthroughdonahons
NGOs• Pressurecompanieswithunsustainablebusinessprachces• Parhcipateinmulhstakeholderinihahvesalongsidecompaniestodevelopzero-deforestahoncommitments• Informconsumersaboutcompanies’businessprachces
Governments• Definetheregulatoryframeworkforcompanies• FundNGOstodotheirwork• Pursuetargetsrelatedtodeforestahonunderinternahonalcommitments• Promotesustainableruraldevelopmentforlocalcommunihes
Smallholdersandlocalcommunihes• Collaboratewithproducersthroughcontractfarmingagreements• Collaboratewithprocessorsthroughotakeagreements• Providelabourforlarge-scaleproducers
![Page 24: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
16
deforestationpledges[74].Accordingtoanothercount,62%and59%ofmajorcompanieswithsupplychainscoveringtimberandpalmoil,respectively,havedeforestationcommitments[29].Only20%and26%,respectively,ofcompanieswithsoyandbeefsupplychainshavesuchcommitments[29],but,atthelevelofproducersandprocessors,one-thirdoftheSouthAmericanbeefmarketiscoveredbytheBrazilianCattleAgreement,andthevastmajorityofsoyproducersarecoveredundertheBrazilianSoyMoratorium[29,75].Thelargestcompaniesinthesesectorsjointlyparticipateinthezero-deforestationmovement,thuseffectivelycreatingalevelplayingfieldandeliminatingconsiderationsofcompetitiveadvantage.
Aswellaspromotingsustainability,participationinmultistakeholderplatformshelpspre-emptpublicityassaultsbyNGOs.TheNewYorkDeclarationonForestshasadiversesetofsignatories,includinggovernments,companiesandcivil-societyorganizations.TheConsumerGoodsForumiscomposedentirelyofcompanies,butmajorNGOsparticipateinitsTropicalForestAlliance2020andCarbonDisclosureProject.Arguably,theseareforumsinwhichNGOsnotonly“stimulatecompaniestomakecommitmentsthroughcampaigns”butalso“providesolutionstoensurecommitmentsaresuccessfullyimplemented”[8].
NGOcampaignshaveledmanycompaniestovowbettermentandtakeonzero-deforestationpledges,withNGOscelebratingsuccess[47,64,67,68,76–80].CompanieswithtarnishedreputationshavemuchtogainfromjoiningmultistakeholderinitiativesandworkingtogetherwiththeNGOs.Moreover,companiesthathavealreadysecuredproductionareashavelessneedtoacquireadditionalproductionareas.
Keypoints
• Zerodeforestationaffectsactorsalongsupplychains,whicharenotalwayseffectivelycoordinated.
• Companiesmaycompeteforbusinessthroughsustainabilityindicatorsofsupplychains,andworkingtowardszerodeforestationcanreducetheriskofcriticismfromactivistNGOs.
• Producersandprocessorsaremostlyindirectparticipantsinthezero-deforestationinitiativesofdownstreamofftakersthatprocurezero-deforestationproducts.Nonetheless,itisproducerswhocarrymostoftheburdenforcomplyingwithzero-deforestationpledges.
• Thereisariskofexcludingsmallproducerswhensupplychainsreorienttocomplywithdownstreamzero-deforestationpledges.
• Tosafeguardpositiveimpacts,companiesneedtoruncomplianceprogrammesacrosstheirsupplychainsthatinvolvesmallproducers,localcommunitiesandotherstakeholders.
![Page 25: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
17
5 Commoditiesandcompanies
Thedistributionofcompaniestakingondeforestationpledgesisskewed.ForestTrendsdiagnosed,forexample,thatendorsersoftheNewYorkDeclarationonForestsareusually“headquarteredinEuropeandNorthAmerica–worldsawayfromtheplanet’stropicaldeforestation”[2].AccordingtoForestTrends,approximately80%ofcompaniesendorsingtheNewYorkDeclarationonForestswereheadquarteredthere,whileonlyapproximately20%werefromSoutheastAsia,wheremostdeforestationoccurs[2].Theenvironmentalandsocialawarenessofconsumersmaybegreatestinthewesternworld[8,11].
Ontheotherhand,althoughEuropeanorNorthAmericancompanies,NGOsandconsumerstogetherdrivemuchofthezero-deforestationmovement,itstopicofconcernistropicaldeforestationindevelopingcountries.Inparticular,deforestationintheAmazonandSoutheastAsiahasreceivedmuchattention.
Insomeregions,plateauinggrowthinforest-riskcommoditieshasreducedtheneedtoexpandproductionareaandmakeszerodeforestationattainable.InBrazil,IndonesiaandMalaysia,productiongrowthratesforoilpalm,beefandsoyhavefallenfromtheirhighpointsof10–15yearsago(productiongrowthratesforforestproductsfollownoclearpatternineitherBrazilorIndonesia,Figure9).TheClimateandLandUseAlliancehasobservedadecouplingofcommodityproductionfromdeforestationintheBrazilianAmazon[81].GrowthratesofoilpalmhavebeenfallinginIndonesiaandMalaysia,andgrowthratesofsoyandbeefproductionhavedeclinedinBrazil(Figure8).Theindustriesfocusedonforest-riskcommoditiesinthesecountriesmayalreadybedevelopedandrequirefewernewplantations.Dependingonconversioncut-offdates,zerodeforestationisattainableforoilpalminIndonesiaandMalaysiaandforsoyandbeefinBrazil.Therearealsonewmarketentrants,however,suchasseveralAfricancountriesthatareaimingtoincreasetheirproductionareas[81,82].Compliancewithzero-deforestationpledgesmaybedifficultincountriestryingtodevelopnewindustriesaroundpalmoilandotherforest-riskcommodities.
Figure8:Growthratesofforest-riskcommoditiesinmajorproducercountriesin2000–2015(5-yearmovingaverage)(source:FAOSTAT)
Brazilstandsoutamongtropicalforestcountries.Itisaproducerofglobalsignificanceformostoftheforest-riskcommodities(Table2),butitalsohasstrongNGOs,whichhaveconductedimportantcampaignsaddressedtotheBrazilianpublic[83,84].Brazilianproducersandprocessorshavetakenonzero-deforestationpledges[55,56].
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
2000 2005 2010 2015
Growth(%) Oi l palmIndonesia
BeefBrazil
Oi l palmMalaysia
SoyaBrazil
![Page 26: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
18
Zero-deforestationinitiativesrevolvearoundfourmajorforest-riskcommodities:palmoil,soy,timber,pulpandpaper,andbeef,andNGOcampaignshavefocusedonthesecommodities(seeelsewhereinthisreport).Muchanalyticalworkhasalsousedthisbreakdown(seeelsewhereinthisreport),althoughsometimespulpandpaperhasbeenseparatedfromtimber,packaginghasbeenmadeexplicit,biofuelshavebeentreatedseparately,andbeefandleatherhavebeengroupedtogether[8,9,29,85].SomeNGOcampaignsandzero-deforestationpledgeshavealsorelatedtoothercommodities,suchassteel[77,83].
OilpalmIndonesia OilpalmMalaysia
CattleBrazil SoyBrazil
RoundwoodBrazil RoundwoodIndonesia
Figure9:Productiontimeseriesofforest-riskcommoditiesinmajortropicalproducercountries(Source:FAOSTAT)
Deforestationoftenresultsfromcomplexinteractionsbetweentheproductionsystemsofseveralforest-riskcommodities.Forestsaretypicallyloggedbeforeconversiontoplantations(forexamplefortimber,pulpandpaper,orpalmoil)[86].Soyandbeefproductionareconnected,because
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)Production(2010=100)
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)Production(2010=100)
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)Production(2010=100)
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)
Production(2010=100)
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
24%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)Production(2010=100)
-8%
-4%
0%
4%
8%
12%
16%
20%
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Growth (%)
Production(2010=100)
![Page 27: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
19
formerpasturesareoftenconvertedtosoybeanfieldsandbecausemanycroplandsproducefodder[86].Attributingdeforestationtoindividualforest-riskcommoditiesisrarelystraightforward.
Oftheforest-riskcommodities,palmoilarguablyreceivesmostattentioninthezero-deforestationmovement.Palm-oilexportsfromtropicalcountriesamountedtoUS$40.1billionin2011,withfurthergrowthprojected[86].Thescaleofdeforestationismassive,withmostoil-palmexpansionoccurringaftertheplanneddeforestationoflowlandtropicalforests.Suchforestsareoftenloggedfirstand,asadriverofdeforestation,palmoilisconnectedtotimberandpulpandpaper[86].IndonesiaandMalaysiaaccountfor87%ofglobaloil-palmproductionandexports[75].Greenpeacehascampaignedagainstpalm-oilproducers[67,79,87,88],whohavereactedbyengagingincertificationandmakingzero-deforestationpledgesthat,accordingtoonecount,cover96%ofglobaltrade[74].TheindustrycreatedtheRSPOin2005,andasignificantpartofglobalproductioniscertified[39](Table2).
Table2:Forest-riskcommoditiesandthezero-deforestationmovement Palmoil Soy Timber,pulpandpaper BeefTop-threeglobalproducers[75]
Indonesia(48%),Malaysia(39%),Thailand(3%)
USA(35%),Brazil(27%),Argentina(19%)
EU27(22%),USA(20%),Russia(9%)
USA(21%),Brazil(16%),EU27(14%)
Exportvaluefromtropicalcountriesin2011[86]
US$40.1m US$48.9m US$34.6m US$10.8m(beefandleather)
Keytropicalforestcountries[86]
Indonesia,Malaysia
Brazil,Paraguay,Bolivia
Indonesia,Brazil,Cameroon,Ghana
Brazil,Paraguay,Argentina,Nicaragua,Colombia
Certification RoundtableonSustainablePalmOil
RoundtableonResponsibleSoy
ForestStewardshipCouncil/ProgrammefortheEndorsementofForestCertification
GlobalRoundtableforSustainableBeef(notforcertification)
Shareofglobalproductionwithdirectmonitoring[81,86,90,91]
68%(globalmarketshare=59%IndonesiaPalmOilPledge+9%SustainablePalmOilManifesto)
24%(globalmarketshareofBrazilianSoyMoratorium=90%nationalmarketcoveragex27%Brazilianmarketshare)
Approachnotavailable
11%(globalmarketshareofBrazilianCattleAgreement=70%shareofnationalexportsx16%Brazilianmarketshare)
Shareofglobalproductionwithmajorcertification[92]
15%
<1% 28%(industrialroundwood)
Certificationnotavailable
Shareofglobalproductioninlow-riskjurisdictions[75]
Notavailable 35%(globalmarketshareofEuropeandNorthAmerica)
29%(globalmarketshareofEuropeandNorthAmerica)
21%(globalmarketshareofEuropeandNorthAmerica)
CompanieswithdedicatedsourcingpolicyinForest500[89]
59% <20% 62%(timber)
26%(beefandleather)
![Page 28: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
20
Thezero-deforestationmovementhasneglectedsoy.TotalexportsfromtropicalcountriesamountedtoUS$48.9billionin2011,justslightlylessfromthannon-tropicalcountries[86].Soyproductionhasledtothedeforestationandconversionofvastareasofcerradowoodlands,particularlyinBrazil’sarcofdeforestation,whereitaccountedforclosetoone-fifthofAmazoniandeforestation[75].Soyisconnectedtocattleproduction,becauseformerpasturesareoftenconvertedtosoybeanfields[86].Greenpeaceandothershavecampaignedagainstinternationalcompanies[78]and,inresponse,majorproducersagreedin2006tohaltdeforestationforsoy.TheresultantBrazilianSoyMoratoriumhascontributedgreatlytoreducingtheconversionofforeststosoybeanfields[56,93].Alsofoundedin2006,theRTRSpromotessustainablesoyproductionandbacksacertificationscheme[40];sofarithasattractedonlyanegligiblemarketshare,however,andanoverrelianceontheBrazilianSoyMoratoriumhasbeenidentifiedasapossiblebarrier[20].Thezero-deforestationpushforsoyhasbeenportrayedaslaggingbehindthatofotherforest-riskcommodities[6,29,91].
Timberandpulpandpapermostlyoriginateindevelopedcountries,andimportsfromdevelopingcountriesarehighlyregulated;zero-deforestationcorporateactionislesscritical,therefore,inthissector.Incontrasttootherforest-riskcommodities,tropicalcountrieshaveonlyasmallmarketshareoftimberandpulpandpaper[86],withexportsamountingtoUS$34.6billionin2011(pulpandpaperaccountingformorethanhalfthetotal).Nevertheless,recentactionagainstwell-knownbrandsfocusedonfibrefromtropicalrainforests,notablyinIndonesia[66,68,76,80,86].TheFSCwasestablishedin1993,andcertificationschemesforforestmanagementarenowrelativematurecomparedwiththoseforotherforest-riskcommodities;nevertheless,only2%oftropicalforestsarecertified[94].Inadditiontocertification,thereisstronggovernmentalactioninNorthAmericaandEuropetoregulatetropicaltimberimportsundertheEUFLEGTinitiative,theEUTimberRegulationandtheUSLaceyAct[51–53].
OnlyafractionofbeefconsumedinEuropeandNorthAmericaoriginatesfromdevelopingcountries,butthezero-deforestationmovementhasfocusednonethelessonbeef.Despiterecentshifts,therearestillalmostasmanycattleinnon-tropicalcountriesasthereareintropicalcountries,andrelatedexportsfromtropicalcountriesamountedtoUS$10.8billionin2011,withstronggrowthprojected[86].Thezero-deforestationmovementfocusesontheAmazon,whereupto75%ofdeforestationislinkedtocattleproduction[75].Anotherfactorinbeefproductionasadriverofdeforestationisthatmanycroplandsareusedtoproducefodderandbecauseformerpasturescanbecomecroplands,andviceversa[86].Environmentalistsexposedthelinkbetweenbeefasaglobalcommodityandtropicaldeforestationasearlyasinthe1980s[95].Morerecently,campaignsbytheFriendsoftheEarthandGreenpeacehaveledtotheBrazilianCattleAgreement,avoluntaryprocurementstandardofthefourmajorBrazilianmeatpackers,whichhasshownsuccessinreducingdeforestation[55,64,84,96].Someinternationalfast-foodcompanieshavealsotakenactioninthecontextofthezero-deforestationmovement[1,97].TheindustrycreatedtheGRSB,which,however,doesnotaimtocertifyproductionsystems[98],andaglobalcertificationstandardremainsunavailable.
Zero-deforestationpledgeshavereachedanimpressivescale,accountingforlargepartsofinternationaltradeandthesupplychainsofmajorcompanies[6,20,74].Suchcommitmentswilltranslateintomuchdemandforcertifiedcommodities,butthesupplyofcertifiedcommoditieshasgrownmuchmoreslowly.Forexample,only15%ofglobalpalm-oilproductioniscertifiedassustainable,but59%ofmajorcompanieshavededicatedsourcingpolicies.Thisdoesnotnecessarilymeananimbalanceinsupplyanddemandbecausemajorcompaniesaccountforonlypartofinternationaltrade,andsomeofthosecompaniesmayrelyonindicatorsofzerodeforestationother
![Page 29: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
21
thanmajorcertificationschemes.Nonetheless,thesenumberspointtoariskthatsustainablepalmoilmaybeinshortsupply.Forotherforest-riskcommodities,supplyanddemandproxiesshowsimilarandmoreseveremismatches;theCarbonDisclosureProjecthasflaggedthathalfofthecompanieswithcommitmentstosourcecertifiedsoyareyettogetanyintotheirsupplychains[10].Companypledgesoftenuse2020asareferencedate,andonlythenwilltheirabilitytomeetpledgesbecomeclear.
Keypoints
• Thezerodeforestationmovementhasfocusedoncertaincommoditiesandgeographiesoverothers.
• Mostofthezero-deforestationpledgesarebyconsumer-facingcompaniesinEuropeandNorthAmericaandarerelevantfortheirsuppliers.
• Zero-deforestationinitiativeshavefocusedonpalmoilandhavehadsometractionfortimber,pulpandpaper;theywerelessrelevantforbeefandhaveneglectedsoya.
• Thesupplyofcertifiedforest-riskcommoditiesdoesnotcurrentlyappeartomatchpotentialdemandfromcompaniesaimingtocomplywithzero-deforestationpledges.
![Page 30: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
22
6 Ensuringlong-termpositiveimpacts
Tohavepositivelong-termimpacts,zero-deforestationpledgesneedtobeaccompaniedbyprogrammesthatensuretransparency,includelocalcommunities,andsafeguardenvironmentalimpacts[8,14,32,81].AccordingtotheRainforestAlliance,“thegoalissustainability,notjusthaltingdeforestation”[14].
Zero-deforestationinitiativeswillonlysucceediftheyengageproducersasallies[11,14,58].Carefulcollaborationbetweenconsumer-facingcompanieswithzero-deforestationpledgesandtheirupstreamsuppliershasbeenreportednotonlytobeeffectivebutalsotoreducecostsandbusinessrisks[15];nonetheless,fourofthemajorinitiativeshavebeencharacterizedaslackingdetaileddiscussionsofcomplexityandthecostsandbenefitsforfarmers[12].Notsecuringbuy-infromproducersmaycompromisetheenvironmentalintegrityofzero-deforestationpledgesasproducersturnelsewhereasawayofsidesteppingattemptstopromotesustainableproduction[8,11].
Environmentalrequirements,includingforzerodeforestation,placeaheavyburdenonproducers.Thefragmentednatureofthezero-deforestationmovementimpliesthatproducersfaceenvironmentalrequirementsnotonlyfromgovernmentsbutincreasinglyalsofromfinancialinstitutionsandcommoditybuyers.FarmersinMatoGrosso,Brazil,forexample,aresaidtofaceenvironmentalrequirementsinatleasteightcontexts(theAgriculturaBassoCarbonoloanprogrammeofCadastroAmbientalRural,theBrazilianSoyMoratorium,theBrazilianCattleAgreement,theMunicipalityBlackList,theRTRS,theBrazilianForestCode,REDD+andtheinitiativesoftheConsumerGoodsForum)[99].Governmentsimposeregulationsaroundlicensing,andcommoditybuyersandfinancialinstitutionsarekeentoreducereputationalrisks[100].Workingatalandscapelevelthroughpreferentialsourcingarrangementshasbeenproposedasawayofreducingthenumberofrequirementsforproducers[49,100].
Zerodeforestationisoftenbasedonnegativepledges:consumer-facingcompaniesvowtocutcertain(zero-deforestationnon-compliant)partsfromtheirsupplychains,andproducersareconsequentlyforcedtocomplywithshiftingprocurementstandardsortolookforalternativeofftakers.Shiftingprocurementstandardsareintendedtohaveknock-oneffectsinproductionsystems,buttheydonottypicallyinvolvesupport,withproducershavingtomakethenecessaryinvestmentstoimprovebusinesspracticesandobtaincertification.Apositivevaluepropositionforproducersiscurrentlynotavailablebutwouldgoalongwaytowardsabroadersustainabilitysolution,particularlyifitcoversbothlargeandsmallproducers[14,32,100].
Theproliferationofzero-deforestationpledgescreatesuncertaintyforbothsmallandlargeproducers.Theymayloseclientsasdownstreamcompaniesassumezero-deforestationpledges[8,11].Ifcertainlandsbecomeineligibleduetoshiftsinstandards,theproductionbasemayreduce[7].Producersmayalsohavedifficultyinattractingfinancing,dependingontheenvironmentalstandardsoffinanciers.Thesituationisexacerbatedbyineffectivesupply-chaincoordinationandthevariabilityofdefinitionsandstandards[11,12].
Smallproducersandlocalcommunitiesmaybeleastabletomanagesuchrisksanduncertainties[8].Theyareoftenconnectedtosupplychainseitherdirectlyassmalldependentorindependentproducersorindirectlyasneighboursorthelaboursupplyoflargeproducers.Thecontributionofsuchsmallproducerstothesupplyofforest-riskcommoditiesissignificantincertainlocalitiesandforcertaincommodities(Figure10).Largeproducershaveachievedmuchofthesuccessinreducingdeforestation,however.InBrazil,forexample,smallproducershavenotyetbeenpartofthepushforlowerdeforestation[101].Localcommunitiesarevulnerabletobeingcutoutoftheproduction
![Page 31: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
23
systemwhensupplychainsreorienttocomplywiththeprocurementguidelinesofinternationaltraders.Smallproducersalsofacehighbarrierstoobtainingcertificationbecauseofthecostsinvolvedinimprovingbusinesspracticesandofthecertificationprocessitself[5,8,16].
Figure10:Estimatesofthecontributionofsmallproducerstotheproductionofforest-riskcommodities(Source:[102–105])
Governmentsmayhavearoleinunifyingstandards,coordinatingworkatthelandscapelevel,andsafeguardingsocialandenvironmentalimpacts.Workingatalandscapelevelthroughgovernmentalland-useplanningwouldaddressseveralconcernsaboutenvironmentalintegritybecauseproductionwouldnolongereasilyshiftelsewhere.Governmentsarealsoinapositiontoregulatesocialandenvironmentalstandardsaswellaslandtenureandcouldthereforeprotectsmallproducersandlocalcommunities[5,8,14].
Keypoints
• Comprehensivesupply-chainmanagementforsocialandenvironmentalimpactsmakeszerodeforestationfeasibleandsafeguardsitsbenefits.
• Environmentalrequirements,includingforzerodeforestation,placeaheavyburdenontheproducersofforest-riskcommodities.
• Thezero-deforestationmovementintroducesuncertaintiesintothebusinessenvironmentofproducersofforest-riskcommodities.
• Zero-deforestationinitiativescanbestsucceediftheyengageproducers,becausecollaborationwillenhanceeffectivenessandreducerisksinvolvedinreorientingsupplychains.
• Tosafeguardpositiveimpactsandmakezerodeforestationfeasible,comprehensiveapproachestosupply-chainmanagementareneeded.
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
OilpalmIndonesia(2003areafarms<50ha)
OilpalmMalaysia(2003areafarms<50ha)
SoyaBrazil(2006familyfarmingproduction)
BeefBrazil(2006familyfarmingproduction)
![Page 32: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
24
7 Fromthesupplychaintothelandscapelevel
Thereisacallforgovernmentengagementtosafeguardprogressandtocreatewide-rangingandlong-lastingimpacts.Governmentscouldprotecttherightsofsmallholdersthatareotherwiseindangerofbeingcutoutwhensupplychainsreorient[11],andtheycouldclarifylandtenure[8,11].Governmentscouldnegotiateagreementswithconsumermarketstoensurepreferentialaccesstozero-deforestationproducts[8],andtheycouldmonitorjurisdictionalprogresstowardszerodeforestation[48,49].
Governmentaldevelopmentplansaimtoreconcileenvironmentalambitionswithotherdevelopmentobjectivesandarenotalwaysfullycompatiblewithzerodeforestation.Althoughtrendsandcausalitydependoncontext,deforestation,economicdevelopmentandpovertyreductionareinterlinked[106].Rulingoutdeforestationwouldseverelyconstraineconomicdevelopmentoptions,particularlyincountrieswithhighforestcover[107].
Manyjurisdictionshavezerodeforestationtargetsoftheirown:asmanyas56nationalandsubnationalgovernments,forexample,aresignatoriestotheNewDeclarationonForests[1].Closeto100INDCsincludereferencestotheforestsector[108],andemergingREDD+schemesoftentargetsubnationaljurisdictionsforemissionreductionprogrammes[70].Zerodeforestationtargetsbygovernmentsandcompaniesoverlap–andyetareoftenisolatedfromeachother[11].
Governmentsandcompanies,therefore,couldcollaboratemore.Agenerallackofalignmenthasbeendiagnosedbetweengovernmentalandcompanypledges,evenwhentheyoverlap[11].Insomecases,companyinitiativesmaycounteractgovernmentaltargets.Forexample,theGovernmentofIndonesiahasstronglycriticizedtheIndonesianPalmOilPledge,citingconcernsabouteconomicgrowthandpossibleadverseimpacts,suchassmallholderslosingmarketaccess[109].
Conversely,private-sectorengagementwasacornerstoneoftheGovernmentofBrazil’sstrategytoreducedeforestation,includingthroughtheBrazilianSoyMoratorium[110,111].Public–privatepartnershipsforzerodeforestationweresuccessfulinreducingAmazoniandeforestationby70%[100].RecentresearchhasshownthatthetransitiontoworkingatalandscapelevelwasinstrumentalinreducingdeforestationintheBrazilianAmazon.Although,inanearlyphase,supply-chain-basedinitiativessuchastheBrazilianCattleAgreementandtheBrazilianSoyMoratoriumwereparamount,thegeographicalunitofinterventioneventuallybecamethecountyratherthantheindividualfarm,withcollaborationbetweentheCentralBank,theMinistryoftheEnvironment,localgovernmentsandtheprivatesector[100,111].
Preferentialsourcingfromlow-riskjurisdictionsintegratesgovernmentactionwiththezero-deforestationambitionsofcompanies.TheEnvironmentalDefenseFundhasadvocatedsettingupzero-deforestationzones,andtheEarthInnovationInstituteproposesterritorialperformancesystems[31,49,100].Theconceptforeseesthatthepublicandprivatesectorsenterintobroadagreementstoworktowardsreducingdeforestationwithinlow-riskjurisdictions,includingwiththedefinitionofperformancemetricsandfinancing.Inatypicalroleallocation,producerswouldworktocomplywithregulationsandreducedeforestation;commoditybuyerswouldpreferentiallysourceforest-riskcommoditiesfromproducerswithinthejurisdiction;financialinstitutionswouldprovidepreferentialaccesstocreditbasedonthelowerreputationalriskprofilesofproducers;andthelocalgovernmentwouldmonitorperformanceatthejurisdictionallevelandworktoeaselicensingschemes.Producersthatengagewouldenjoymanyofthesamebenefitsascertifiedproducersintermsofaccesstomarketsandfinancing;commoditybuyerswouldhaveaccesstoforestrisk
![Page 33: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
25
commodities;financialinstitutionswouldbeabletoplaceloanswithlowerriskprofiles;andthelocalgovernmentswouldworktowardstheirenvironmentaltargets[31,49,100](Figure11,Figure12).
Figure11:Contributionsandbenefitsofproducers,commoditybuyers,financialinstitutionsandlocalgovernmentfromjurisdictionalzero-deforestationinitiatives
Insomelocations,thepublicsectorandcompaniesalreadyjointlyworktocreatelow-riskjurisdictionsforthepreferentialsourcingofforestriskcommodities,givingrisetopositiveexperiencesthatarebeingcollected[81,99,100].SeveralNGOsprovidetechnicalsupportformonitoringjurisdictionalperformanceagainstenvironmentaltargets,usuallyputtingreduceddeforestationatthecore[48–50].TheConsumerGoodsForum’ssourcingguidelinesreferexplicitlytojurisdictionsfortimberandpulpandpaper;forpalmoiltheyrelyonarisk-basedverificationmechanismthatcouldalsobemetbyjurisdictions[27,28].Somelargecompanieshavecommittedrecentlyto‘Produce–Protect’–thepreferentialsourcingofforest-riskcommoditiesfromjurisdictionswithambitiousenvironmentalandsustainabledevelopmenttargets,combinedwithappropriatemonitoring[112].
Atthelandscapelevel,zerodeforestationcannotsensiblyaimtoreduceforestconversiontozero,aiminginsteadtointroducebetterproductionstandards.Doubtsmaythereforeberaisedaboutpreferentialsourcingfromlow-riskjurisdictionsasameanstoachieve‘zero’deforestation[100].Nonethelessitisaneffectivewayinwhichgovernmentsandcompaniescanusefullycollaborateandmainstreambetterbusinesspracticesacrossentirelandscapes.Inthis,zerodeforestationmaybematuringfromabuzzwordtoaconceptthatcanguidecorporateandgovernmentaldecision-making.
Producers• Worktocomplywithregulahonsandreducedeforestahon• Enjoyaccesstomarketsandfinancing
Commoditybuyers• Preferenhallysourceforest-riskcommodihesfromjurisdichon• Accessforest-riskcommodihesatlowriskprofile
Financialinshtuhons• Providepreferenhalaccesstocredit• Placeloanswithlow-riskprofiles
Localgovernment• Monitorsperformanceandworkstoeaselicensing• Achievesenvironmentaltargets
![Page 34: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
26
Regularproducers Certifiedproducers Producersinlow-riskjurisdiction
Regulatoryagencies
Oftenhavedifficultiesincomplyingwithrulesof
regulatoryagencies(orcertification
Standards)Licenseproducerstooperatewithonerousrulesandprocedures
Complywithrulesofregulatoryagenciesandcertification
standardsLicenseproducerstooperatewithonerousrulesandprocedures
Mostlycomplywithrulesofregulatoryagencies,
self-controlLicenseproducerstooperatewithsimplifiedrulesandprocedures,jurisdictionalmonitoringforpreferentialsourcing
Commod
itybuyers
Supplycommoditieswithsignificantreputational
risktobuyersOfftakecommodities,restrictingtermsonpayments,legalityandmanagement
Supplycommoditieswithlowreputationalrisk
Offtakecommoditiesofferingbetterterms
Supplycommoditieswithlowreputationalrisks
OfftakeCommoditiesofferingbettertermsunderpreferentialsourcingagreements
Fina
nceinstitu
tions
Repayloanswithreputationalrisks
ordefaultProvideloans,restrictingtermsonrepayment,legalityandmanagement
Repayloanswithlowreputationalandrepaymentrisk
Provideloansunderbetterterms
Repayloanswithlowreputationalandrepaymentrisk
Provideloansunderbetterterms
Figure12:Breakdownofregularproducers,certifiedproducersandproducersinlow-riskjurisdictionstoregulatoryagencies,commoditybuyersandfinanceinstitutions
Keypoints
• Collaboratinggovernmentsandcompaniescancreateimpactsatscale.• Governmentengagementinzerodeforestationatalandscapelevelcouldsafeguardprogresson
zerodeforestationandcreatewide-rangingandlong-lastingimpacts.• Manygovernmentshavezero-deforestationtargetsoftheirown,largelyaimingtoimprove
governanceandpromotehigherproductionstandards.• Despitethesharedobjectiveofreducingdeforestation,therearefewpositiveexamplesof
effectivecollaborationbetweengovernmentsandcompanies.• Collaborationbetweenthepublicandprivatesectorstowardszero-deforestationtargetsmay
improvethebusinessenvironmentfortheproductionofforest-riskcommodities.
![Page 35: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
27
8 Conclusions
Definitionshavebigimplicationsforthefeasibilityandstringencyofzero-deforestationcommitments.Pledgesrefertonetorgrossdeforestation,tosupplychainsorlandscapes,andtosomelevelof‘acceptabledeforestation’.Thezero-deforestationinitiativesofcompaniesusuallyrefertotheirsupplychains,whilegovernmentsoftenlookatthelandscapelevel.Mostmomentumisaroundzeronetdeforestation,whichmeansnochangeinthetotalforestedarea,andnewforestscancompensateforconvertedforests.Operationalizingzeronetdeforestationrequiresdefining‘acceptabledeforestation’–thatis,thetypesofstandingforeststhatareoff-limitstoconversion,andwhattypesofnewforestscancompensateforclearedforests.Fortheverificationofzero-deforestationcommitments,companypledgesoftenrefertostandardagriculturalandforestcertification,whichimpliesdefinitionsof‘acceptabledeforestation’.
Procuringcertifiedcommoditiesisacommonproxyforeliminatingdeforestationfromsupplychains,despiteconcernsabouttheadequacyofthismeasure.Companiesusethreecommonapproachestoimplementingzero-deforestationpledges:1)certifiedprocurement;2)directareamonitoring;and3)procurementfromlow-riskjurisdictions.Thelatterallowscompaniestoearmarkproductsaszero-deforestation-compliant,basedonorigin.Somezero-deforestationinitiativesdirectlymonitorproductionareas,includingforconversiontimepointsand‘highcarbonstock’toidentify‘acceptabledeforestation’.Mostly,however,companiesconsidercertificationundertheleadingschemes,inparticularRSPO,FSC,PEFCandRTRS,asgoodevidenceofzerodeforestation,whichmayincludecommoditiesoriginatingfromconvertedsecondaryforests,degradedforests,orforestswithlowheight.Alltheseimplementationapproachesforzero-deforestationcommitmentshaveimplicationsforactorsalongthesupplychain.
Zerodeforestationaffectsactorsalongthesupplychains,whicharenotalwayscoordinatedeffectively.Companiesmaycompeteforbusinessthroughthesustainabilityindicatorsusedbysupplychains,andworkingtowardszerodeforestationcanreducetheriskofcriticismfromactivistNGOs.Producersandprocessorsaremostlyindirectparticipantsinthezero-deforestationinitiativesoftheirdownstreamofftakers,whichinvolveprocuringzero-deforestationproducts.Nonetheless,itisproducerswhocarrymostoftheburdenforcomplyingwithzero-deforestationpledges.Thereisariskofexcludingsmallproducerswhensupplychainsreorienttocomplywithdownstreamzero-deforestationpledges.Tosafeguardthepositiveimpactsoftheirzero-deforestationinitiatives,companiesshouldruncomplianceprogrammesacrosstheirsupplychainsinvolvingsmallproducers,localcommunitiesandotherstakeholders.
Thezero-deforestationmovementhasfocusedoncertaincommoditiesandlocationsoverothers.Mostzero-deforestationpledgesarebyconsumer-facingcompaniesinEuropeandNorthAmerica.Zero-deforestationinitiativeshavefocusedonpalmoilandhavealsohadsometractionfortimberandpulpandpaper;theyhavebeenlessrelevantforbeef,andsoyhasbeenneglected.Thecurrentsupplyofcertifiedforest-riskcommoditiesdoesnotappeartomatchthepotentialdemandfromcompaniesaimingtocomplywithzero-deforestationpledges.
Comprehensivesupply-chainmanagementforsocialandenvironmentalimpactsmakeszerodeforestationfeasibleandsafeguardsitsbenefits.Thezero-deforestationmovementplaceaheavyburdenontheproducersofforest-riskcommoditiesandintroducesuncertaintiesintotheirbusinessenvironments.Zero-deforestationinitiativesaremostlikelytosucceediftheyengageproducers,becausecollaborationwillenhanceeffectivenessandreducetherisksinvolvedinreorientingsupply
![Page 36: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
28
chains.Tosafeguardpositiveimpactsandmakezerodeforestationfeasible,comprehensiveapproachestosupply-chainmanagementareneeded.
Collaboratinggovernmentsandcompaniescancreateimpactsatscale.Governmentalengagementinzerodeforestationatthelandscapelevelcouldsafeguardtheprogressmadetowardszerodeforestationandcreatewide-rangingandlong-lastingimpacts.Manygovernmentshavezero-deforestationtargetsoftheirown,largelyaimingtoimprovegovernanceandpromotehigherproductionstandards.Despitethesharedobjectiveofreducingdeforestation,therearefewpositiveexamplesofeffectivecollaborationbetweengovernmentsandcompanies.Collaborationbetweenthepublicandprivatesectorsonzero-deforestationtargetsmayimprovethebusinessenvironmentfortheproductionofforest-riskcommodities.
![Page 37: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
29
9 Implicationsofzero-deforestationinitiativesforforestproductvaluechains
Althoughforestproductsareomnipresentinglobalsupplychains,palmoil–nottimberandpulpandpaper–hasbeenthefocusofzero-deforestationinitiatives.MuchNGOcampaigninghasfocusedonpalmoilasaforest-riskcommodity,andseveralcompanyzero-deforestationpledgesreceivingattentionalsofocusonpalmoil[81].Pulpandpaperisomnipresentinglobalsupplychainsthroughitsuseinpackaging,includingforconsumergoods.Somecampaignshavetargetedpulpandpaper,andtimberhasreceivedlessattention.
Althoughtimberandpulpandpaperareforest-riskcommodities,significantpartsoftheirglobalmarketsareshieldedfromdeforestationrisk.MostofthetimberandpulpandpaperconsumedinEuropeandNorthAmericaoriginatefromlow-riskjurisdictionsindevelopedcountries.Tropicalcountrieshaveasmallershareofglobalmarketsthanforotherforest-riskcommodities,notablypalmoil[86].TimberimportsfromdevelopingcountriestoNorthAmericaandEuropearehighlyregulatedundertheEUTimberRegulationandtheUSLaceyAct[51,53].
Intheforestsector,zero-deforestationcampaignsandrelatedcorporateactionfocusonpulpandpaper,nottimber.Recentadvocacyactionagainstwell-knownbrandshasfocusedontropicalpulpandpaper,notablyinIndonesia[66,68,76,80,86].Onereasonforthisistheomnipresenceofpulpandpaperinthesupplychainsofconsumer-goodscompanies(becauseofitsuseinpackaging),makingitaneasiertargetforenvironmentalcampaigning.Anotherreasonisthataportionoftheglobalsupplyoftropicaltimberoriginatesfromnaturalforestmanagementandisnotadirectcauseofdeforestation(asopposedtopulpandpaper,whichismostlyderivedfromplantationsthatcouldhavereplacednaturalforests).Fornaturalforestmanagement,theriskofdeforestationislessacutethantheriskofunsustainablelogging,whichisbeyondthescopeofmostzero-deforestationaction.Third,timbermarketsaregenerallymorefragmentedthanthoseforpulpandpaperandotherforest-riskcommodities,hamperingsupplychain-basedaction[86].
Theenvironmentalimpactsofforestmanagementandtheforest-basedindustryreceivedattentionlongbeforetheconceptofzerodeforestationemerged.Fordecades,debateonforestshasfocusedonprogresstowardssustainableforestmanagement,whichwassetoutintheForestPrinciplesoftheUnitedNationsConferenceonEnvironmentandDevelopmentasearlyas1992[113].TheFSCwasestablishedin1993,andforestmanagementcertificationschemesarenowrelativematurecomparedwiththoseofotherforest-riskcommodities,suchastheRTRSandtheRSPO,whichwereestablished10–20yearslater.WithsuchalonghistoryofattentiononforestmanagementfrompolicymakersandNGOs,environmentalconcernsandsustainablemanagementpracticeshavealreadybeenmainstreaminlargepartsoftheforest-basedindustry.Thismayexplainwhymostmajorcompaniesinvolvedintheglobaltimberandpulpandpapersupplychainshavesustainablesourcingpoliciesinplace[20].
Althoughtimberandpulpandpaperhavenotbeenthefocusofzero-deforestationcampaigns,thereremainsmuchpotentialforenhancingsustainability.Despitethesuccessesofforestmanagementcertification,onlyabout2%oftropicalforestsarecertified[94].Naturalforestmanagementdoesnottypicallyleadtodeforestation,butunsustainableloggingpracticescanleadtodestructiveforestdegradation.Tropicalplantationforestryfortheproductionofpulpandpapercandrivedeforestationinasimilarwaytootherforest-riskcommodities.ThisiswhytimberandpulpandpaperareincludedbyNGOscampaigningforzerodeforestationandinthezero-deforestationpledgesofcompanies.
![Page 38: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
30
Decadesofexperienceinthesustainableproductionoftimberandpulpandpapercanprovideimportantlessonsforotherforest-riskcommodities.Somecompaniesintheforest-basedindustryhavelearnedimportantlessonstheycouldsharewiththeirpeersinvolvedinthesupplychainsforotherforest-riskcommodities.Insomecountries,theforest-basedindustryhastakenaleadershiproleincross-sectoralprocessesforenhancedenvironmentalgovernance[114].
![Page 39: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
31
10 Literature
1.UnitedNations.NewYorkDeclarationonForests.2015.
2.ForestTrends.FirmCommitments:TrackingCompanyEndorsersoftheNewYorkDeclarationonForests.,2015.
3.GEF.TakingDeforestationOutofCommoditySupplyChains.Washingon,DC,USA:GlobalEnvironmentFacility(GEF)
4.GerritsR.SustainabilityintheSupplyChain.In:AhmedK(ed.).GettingtoGreen—ASourcebookofPollutionManagementPolicyToolsforGrowthandCompetitiveness.Washingon,DC,USA:TheWorldBank,2012,194–204.
5.SmitH,McnallyR,GijsenberghA.ImplementingDeforestation-FreeSupplyChains–CertificationandBeyond.,2015.
6.ForestTrends.Corporations,Commodities,andCommitmentsThatCount.,2015.
7.CDP.Deforestation-FreeSupplyChains:FromCommitmentstoAction-CDPGlobalForestsReport.CarbonDisclosureProject(CDP),2014.
8.BregmanT,MitchellA,LachauxCetal.AchievingZero(Net)DeforestationCommitments-WhatItMeansandHowtoGetThere.Oxford,UK:GlobalCanopyProgramme,2015.
9.CDP.Deforestation-FreeSupplyChains:FromCommitmentstoAction-PolicyBriefing.,2014.
10.CDP.RealizingZero-Deforestation:TransformingSupplyChainsfortheFuture.London,UK:CarbonDisclosureProject(CDP),2015.
11.TFD.ScopingDialogueonUnderstandingDeforestation-Free(UDF)-Co-ChairSummaryReport.NewHaven,CT,USA,2014.
12.MeijerK.CanSupplyChainInitiativesReduceDeforestation?AComparativeAnalysisofCasesfromBrazilandIndonesia.,2014.
13.FishmanA.Understanding“Deforestation-Free”:TheStateofPlayandIssuestoConsiderduringTFD’sOctober2014Dialogue.,2014.
14.RainforestAlliance.HaltingDeforestationandAchievingSustainability.,2015.
15.TFA2020.ReducingSupplyChainDeforestation-CivilSocietyBackgrounderandInventory.
16.SeymourF.CorporateCommitmentstoDeforestation-FreeSupplyChains:AnExpedition.,2015.
17.CGF.DeforestationResolution.2010.
18.TFA2020.TropicalForestAlliance2020Overview.
19.BEI.TheBEI&CGF’s“SoftCommodities”Compact:TechnicalGuidance.,2015.
![Page 40: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
32
20.GCP.TheForest500.2015thed.Oxford,UK:GlobalCanopyProgramme,2015.
21.ACSFI.ExecutiveSummaryReportoftheFifty-SixthSession.Washingon,DC,USA,2015.
22.BrownS,ZarinD.Whatdoeszerodeforestationmean?Science(80-)2013;342:805–7.
23.AlvaradoP.WFC2009:ZeroDeforestationby2020aUtopia;NetDeforestationReduction,notthatMuch.TreeHugger2009.
24.FAO.ForestResourcesAssessment2015:TermsandDefinitions.Rome,Italy,2012.
25.WWF.GlobalNetworkPosition:Deforestation-freeproductionandfinance.2015:7.
26.CGF.TheSustainableSoySourcingGuidelines.
27.CGF.CGFPulp,Paper&PackagingGuidelinesJune21,2013.,2013.
28.CGF.SustainablePalmOilSourcingGuidelines.ConsumerGoodsForum(CGF),2015.
29.GCP.TheForest500.2014thed.RautnerM,LawrenceL,BregmanT,etal.(eds.).Oxford,UK:GlobalCanopyProgramme,2015.
30.SamLawson.ConsumerGoodsandDeforestation:AnAnalysisoftheExtentandNatureofIllegalityinForestConversionforAgricultureandTimberPlantations.Washingon,DC,USA:ForestTrends,2014.
31.MeyerC,MillerD.ZeroDeforestationZones:TheCaseforLinkingDeforestation-FreeSupplyChainInitiativesandJurisdictionalREDD+.JSustainFor2015;34:559–80.
32.RodTaylor.Deforestation-freesupplychains&investment:progressandchallenges.In:FAO(ed.).TheEconomicsofClimateChangeMitigationOptionsintheForestSector.Rome,Italy:FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO),2015.
33.WWF.ZeroNetDeforestationby2020-AWWFBriefingPaper.2008.
34.GibbonA,BaroodyJ,McNallyR.TheRoleofVoluntaryAgriculturalCertificationStandardsinQuantifyingandReducingGreenhouseGasEmissions:ExploringtheCocoa,Coffee,PalmOilandShrimpAquacultureSectors.2014:74.
35.Greenpeace.IdentifyingHighCarbonStock(HCS)ForestforProtection.,2013.
36.SustainablePalmOilManifesto.HighCarbonStock(HCS)StudyoftheSustainablePalmOilManifesto:ADetailedDescription.,2014.
37.GoldenAgri-Resources.HighCarbonStockForestStudyReport.,2012.
38.FSC.FSCPrinciplesandCriteriaforForestStewardship.Bonn,Germany:ForestStewardshipCouncil(FSC),2015.
39.RSPO.PrinciplesandCriteriafortheProductionofSustainablePalmOil.KualaLumpur,Malaysia:RoundTableonSustainablePalmOil(RSPO),2013.
![Page 41: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
33
40.RTRS.RTRSStandardforResponsibleSoyProduction.Version2.RoundTableonResponsibleSoy(RTRS),2013.
41.FAO.SecondExpertMeetingOnHarmonizingForest-relatedDefinitionsforUsebyVariousStakeholders.Rome,Italy:FoodandAgricultureOrganizationoftheUnitedNations(FAO),2002.
42.Greenpeace.TheHighCarbonStockApproach:“NoDeforestation”inPractice.,2014.
43.FAO.SustainableForestManagement.
44.UnitedNationsGeneralAssembly.Non-legallybindinginstrumentonalltypesofforests.2008.
45.PEFC.SustainableForestManagementRequirements.Geneva,Switzerland:ProgrammefortheEndorsementofForestCertificationSchemes(PEFC),2010.
46.WWF.WWFOpenLettertotheIndonesianForestryCertificationCooperation.2015.
47.Greenpeace.Greenpeace,RANWarnofForestCertificationGreenwash.PressRelease.http://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/Press-Centre/Press-Releases/Greenpeace-RAN-Warn-of-Forest-Certification-Greenwash/.PublishedJune24,2015.
48.ForestTrends.PublicPrivateCo-FinanceInitiative.
49.EII.Territorialperformancesystem.2015.
50.VCS.JurisdictionalandNestedREDD+(JNR).
51.EC.TimberRegulation.EurComm2010.
52.EC.FLEGTVoluntaryPartnershipAgreements(VPAs).EurComm2008:93.
53.USDA.LaceyAct.UnitedStatesDepAgric.
54.IPOP.IndonesiaPalmOilPledge(IPOP).2014.
55.NationalWildlifeFederation.APathtoZero-DeforestationCattle.2015.
56.SoyMoratorium.MappingandMonitoringSoyPlantingintheAmazonBiomeSeventhYear.,2014.
57.SustainablePalmOilManifesto.SustainablePalmOilManifesto.
58.UoCS.ABusinessGuidetoaDeforestation-FreeSupplyChain.,2013.
59.TFT.GoodWood,GoodBusiness.TheForestTrust(TFT),2003.
60.TFT.GuidetoLegality:PracticalAdviceforTimberProducers,ProcessorsandExporters.TheForestTrust(TFT)
61.KarsentyA.UsingPEStoachieve“zerodeforestation”agriculture.Perspective2015;36.
![Page 42: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
34
62.EquatorPrinciples.EquatorPrinciples.AboutequatorPrinc2013:23.
63.WWF.Don’tFlushTigerForests.Washingon,DC,USA,2012.
64.Greenpeace.SlaughteringtheAmazon.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2009.
65.EilperinJ.AsianpapergiantagreestostopcuttingIndonesia’snaturalrainforests.TheWashingtonPost.February5,2013.
66.RainforestActionNetwork.ANewChapterforthePublishingIndustry:PuttingPromisesintoPractice.SanFrancisco,CA,USA,2014.
67.Greenpeace.CaughtRedHanded:HowNestle’sUseofPalmOilIsHavingaDevastatingImpactonRainforest,theClimateandOrang-Utans.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2010.
68.Greenpeace.SinarMasUnderInvestigation-HowAPPIsToyingwithExtinction.,2011.
69.TFA2020.OverviewandFrequentlyAskedQuestions.
70.WWF.ZeroNetDeforestation:StatusReport-HowFarDoCurrentNationalTargetsGetUs?,2015.
71.Nestlé.NestléCommitmentonDeforestationandForestStewardship.2013:3.
72.Nestlé.Nestléopenforumondeforestation,Malaysia.
73.Nestlé.AnnextotheGeneralResponsibleSourcingGuideline:PalmOil.2013.
74.ChainReactionResearch.TheChain:96%ofGlobalPalmOilTradeCoveredbyZero-Deforestation.2014.
75.CDP.Forestriskcommodities.2014.
76.Greenpeace.HowKFCIsJunkingtheJunglebyDrivingRainforestDestructioninIndonesia.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2012.
77.Greenpeace.DrivingDestructionintheAmazonHowSteelProductionIsThrowingtheForestintotheFurnace.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2013.
78.Greenpeace.EatingUptheAmazon.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2006.
79.Greenpeace.CookingtheClimate.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2013.
80.Greenpeace.TheRAMINPaperTrail.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2012.
81.CLUA.DisruptingtheGlobalCommodityBusiness.SanFrancisco,CA,USA:ClimateandLandUseAlliance(CLUA),2014.
82.Greenpeace.LicencetoLaunder.Amsterdam,Netherlands:Greenpeace,2014.
![Page 43: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
35
83.FundaciónAvina,InstitutoEthos,RedeNossaSãoPauloetal.CombateÀDevastaçãoAmbientalETrabalhoEscravoNaProduçãoDoFerroEDoAço.FundaciónAvina,InstitutoEthos,RedeNossaSãoPaulo,WorldwideFundforNature(WWF),2012.
84.AmigosdaTerra.AHoraDaConta.SãoPaulo,Brazil,2009.
85.UoCS.TheRootoftheProblem.UnionofConcernedScientists(UoCS)(ed.).,2011.
86.RautnerM,LeggettM,DavisF.TheLittleBookofBigDeforestationDrivers.Oxford,UK:GlobalCanopyProgramme,2013.
87.Greenpeace.FryingtheForest:HowIndia’sUseofPalmOilIsHavingaDevastatingImpactonIndonesia'sRainforests,TigersandtheGlobalClimate.Bengaluru,India,2012.
88.Greenpeace.PalmOil’sNewFrontier.Amsterdam,Netherlands,2012.
89.GCP.Analysis:Companies-MeasuringProgresstoZeroDeforestation.,2015.
90.SustainablePalmOilManifesto.
91.CDP.SoybeanOverlooked?TheInvestorCaseforDeforestation-FreeSoy.London,UK,2015.
92.PottsJ,LynchM,WilkingsAetal.TheStateofSustainabilityInitiativesReview2014-StandardsandtheGreenEconomy.InternationalInstituteforSustainableDevelopment(IISD)andInternationalInstituteforEnvironmentandDevelopment(IIED),2014.
93.GibbsHK,RauschL,MungerJetal.Brazil’sSoyMoratorium.Science(80-)2015;347:377–8.
94.FernholzK,KraxnerF.Certifiedforestproductsmarkets,2011-2012.UNECE/FAOForestProductsAnnualMarketReview,2011-2012.UNECE/FAO,2012,107–16.
95.MyersN.TheHamburgerConnection:HowCentralAmerica’sForestsBecameNorthAmerica'sHamburgers.Ambio1981;10.
96.GibbsHK,MungerJ,L’RoeJetal.DidRanchersandSlaughterhousesRespondtoZero-DeforestationAgreementsintheBrazilianAmazon?ConservLett,DOI:10.1111/conl.12175.
97.McDonald’s.McDonald’sCorporationCommitmentonDeforestation.2015.
98.GRSB.GRSBBackground.2014.
99.NepstadD,IrawanS,BezerraTetal.Morefood,moreforests,feweremissions,betterlivelihoods:linkingREDD+,sustainablesupplychainsanddomesticpolicyinBrazil,IndonesiaandColombia.CarbonManag2013;4:639–58.
100.NepstadDC,McgrathD,SticklerCetal.SlowingAmazondeforestationthroughpublicpolicyandinterventionsinbeefandsoysupplychains.Science(80-)2014;344:1118–23.
101.GodarJ,GardnerTA,TizadoEJetal.Actor-specificcontributionstothedeforestationslowdownintheBrazilianAmazon.ProcNatlAcadSci2015;111:15591–6.
![Page 44: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
36
102.VermeulenS,GoadN.TowardsBetterPracticeinSmallholderPalmOilProduction.London,UK:InternationalInstituteforEnvironmentandDevelopment(iied),2006.
103.IBGE.CensoAgropecuário.2006thed.RiodeJaneiro,Brazil:InstitutoBrasileirodeGeografiaeEstatística(IBGE),2006.
104.ZSL.Smallholders.SustainPalmOilTransparToolkit.
105.BissonnetteJF,DeKoninckR.LargePlantationsversusSmallholdingsinSoutheastAsia:HistoricalandContemporaryTrends.LandGrabbing,ConflictandAgrarian-EnvironmentalTransformations:PerspectivesfromEastandSoutheastAsia.ChiangMai,Thailand:ChiangMaiUniversity,2015.
106.ChomitzK,BuysP.AtLoggerheads?:AgriculturalExpansion,PovertyReduction,andEnvironmentintheTropicalForests.,2007.
107.EliaschJ.ClimateChange:FinancingGlobalForests.London,UK,2008.
108.GrassiG,DentenerF.QuantifyingtheContributionoftheLandUseSectortotheParisClimateAgreement.,2015.
109.JongHN.Govtopposeszero-deforestationpledgebypalmoilfirms.JakartaPost.http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/08/29/govt?opposes?zero?deforestation?pledge?palm?oil?firms.html.PublishedAugust29,2015.
110.PhillipsT.BrazilelectionseesbreakthroughforGreensandenvironmentalagenda.TheGuardian.http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/oct/04/brazil-election-breakthrough-greens.PublishedOctober4,2010.
111.BoucherD.Brazil’sSuccessinReducingDeforestation.Washingon,DC,USA:UnionofConcernedScientists(UoCS),2011.
112.CGF.StatementfromConsumerGoodsForumCo-Chairs,ActingIndividually:ProductionProtection.Paris,France,2015.
113.ForestPrinciples.UnitedNationsConferenceonEnvironmentandDevelopment(UNCED).RiodeJaneiro,Brazil,1992.
114.CoalizãoBrasil.CoalizãoBrasilClima,FlorestasEAgricultura.,2014.
![Page 45: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
37
Annex1:Majorcertificationschemesandtheirprincipleswithrelevancetodeforestation
FSCPrinciple6.9withrelevancetodeforestation[38]TheOrganizationshallnotconvertnaturalforesttoplantations,nornaturalforestsorplantationsonsitesdirectlyconvertedfromnaturalforesttonon-forestlanduse,exceptwhentheconversion:a)affectsaverylimitedportionoftheareaoftheManagementUnit,andb)willproduceclear,substantial,additional,securelong-termconservationbenefitsintheManagementUnit,andc)doesnotdamageorthreatenHighConservationValues,noranysitesorresourcesnecessarytomaintainorenhancethoseHighConservationValues.Naturalforest:Aforestareawithmanyoftheprincipalcharacteristicsandkeyelementsofnativeecosystems,suchascomplexity,structureandbiologicaldiversity,includingsoilcharacteristics,floraandfauna,inwhichalloralmostallthetreesarenativespecies,notclassifiedasplantations.‘Naturalforest’includesthefollowingcategories:•Forestaffectedbyharvestingorotherdisturbances,inwhichtreesarebeingorhavebeenregeneratedbyacombinationofnaturalandartificialregenerationwithspeciestypicalofnaturalforestsinthatsite,andwheremanyoftheabove-groundandbelow-groundcharacteristicsofthenaturalforestarestillpresent.Inborealandnorthtemperateforestswhicharenaturallycomposedofonlyoneorfewtreespecies,acombinationofnaturalandartificialregenerationtoregenerateforestofthesamenativespecies,withmostoftheprincipalcharacteristicsandkeyelementsofnativeecosystemsofthatsite,isnotbyitselfconsideredasconversiontoplantations.•Naturalforestswhicharemaintainedbytraditionalsilviculturalpracticesincludingnaturalorassistednaturalregeneration.•Well-developedsecondaryorcolonizingforestofnativespecieswhichhasregeneratedinnon-forestareas.•Thedefinitionof‘naturalforest’mayincludeareasdescribedaswoodedecosystems,woodlandandsavanna.[furtherdetailsfollow]Plantation:Aforestareaestablishedbyplantingorsowingwithusingeitheralienornativespecies,oftenwithoneorfewspecies,regularspacingandevenages,andwhichlacksmostoftheprincipalcharacteristicsandkeyelementsofnaturalforests.ThedescriptionofplantationsmaybefurtherdefinedinFSCForestStewardshipStandards,withappropriatedescriptionsorexamples,suchas:•Areaswhichwouldinitiallyhavecompliedwiththisdefinitionof‘plantation’butwhich,afterthepassageofyears,containmanyormostoftheprincipalcharacteristicsandkeyelementsofnativeecosystems,maybeclassifiedasnaturalforests.•Plantationsmanagedtorestoreandenhancebiologicalandhabitatdiversity,structuralcomplexityandecosystemfunctionalitymay,afterthepassageofyears,beclassifiedasnaturalforests.•Borealandnorthtemperateforestswhicharenaturallycomposedofonlyoneorfewtreespecies,inwhichacombinationofnaturalandartificialregenerationisusedtoregenerateforestofthesamenativespecies,withmostoftheprincipalcharacteristicsandkeyelementsofnativeecosystemsofthatsite,maybeconsideredasnaturalforest,andthisregenerationisnotbyitselfconsideredasconversiontoplantations.PEFCCriterion1,item5.1.11withrelevancetodeforestation[45]Conversionofforeststoothertypesoflanduse,includingconversionofprimaryforeststoforestplantations,shallnotoccurunlessinjustifiedcircumstanceswheretheconversion:a)isincompliancewithnationalandregionalpolicyandlegislationrelevantforlanduseandforestmanagementandisaresultofnationalorregionalland-useplanninggovernedbyagovernmentalorotherofficialauthorityincludingconsultationwithmateriallyanddirectlyinterestedpersonsandorganisations;and
![Page 46: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
38
b)entailsasmallproportionofforesttype;andc)doesnothavenegativeimpactsonthreatened(includingvulnerable,rareorendangered)forestecosystems,culturallyandsociallysignificantareas,importanthabitatsofthreatenedspeciesorotherprotectedareas;andd)makesacontributiontolong-termconservation,economic,andsocialbenefits.Therequirementforthe“conversionofforeststoothertypesoflanduse,includingconversionofprimaryforeststoforestplantations”meansthatforestplantationsestablishedbyaforestconversionafter31December2010inotherthan“justifiedcircumstances”donotmeettherequirementandarenoteligibleforcertification.RSPOPrinciple7.3withrelevancetodeforestation[39]NewplantingssinceNovember2005havenotreplacedprimaryforestoranyarearequiredtomaintainorenhanceoneormoreHighConservationValues.PrimaryForest:Aprimaryforestisaforestthathasneverbeenloggedandhasdevelopedfollowingnaturaldisturbancesandundernaturalprocesses,regardlessofitsage.Alsoincludedasprimary,areforeststhatareusedinconsequentiallybyindigenousandlocalcommunitieslivingtraditionallifestylesrelevantfortheconservationandsustainableuseofbiologicaldiversity.Thepresentcoverisnormallyrelativelyclosetothenaturalcompositionandhasarisen(predominantly)throughnaturalregeneration[41].RTRSPrinciple4,Criterion4.4,Indicator4.4.1withrelevancetodeforestation[40]AfterMay2009expansionforsoycultivationhasnottakenplaceonlandclearedofnativehabitatexceptunderthefollowingconditions:ItisinlinewithanRTRS-approvedmapandsystem(seeAnnex4.)orWherenoRTRS-approvedmapandsystemisavailable:a)AnyareaalreadyclearedforagricultureorpasturebeforeMay2009andusedforagricultureorpasturewithinthepast12yearscanbeusedforsoyexpansion,unlessregeneratedvegetationhasreachedthedefinitionofnativeforest(seeglossary).b)Thereisnoexpansioninnativeforests(seeglossary)c)Inareasthatarenotnativeforest(seeglossary),expansionintonativehabitatonlyoccursaccordingtooneofthefollowingtwooptions:Option1.Officialland-usemapssuchasecological-economiczoningareusedandexpansiononlyoccursinareasdesignatedforexpansionbythezoning.IftherearenoofficiallandusemapsthenmapsproducedbythegovernmentundertheConventiononBiologicalDiversityareused,andexpansiononlyoccursoutsidepriorityareasforconservationshownonthesemaps.Option2.AHighConservationValueArea(HCVA)assessmentisundertakenpriortoclearingandthereisnoconversionofHighConservationValueAreas.Thereisnoconversionoflandwherethereisanunresolvedlanduseclaimbytraditionallandusersunderlitigation,withouttheagreementofbothparties.Nativeforest:Areasofnativevegetationof1haormorewithcanopycoverofmorethan35%andwheresometrees(atleast10treesperhectare)reach10minheight(orareabletoreachthesethresholdsinsitu(ie.inthatsoil/climatecombination)).
![Page 47: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
39
Annex2:Chain-of-custodyapproachesforpalmoil
BookandclaimCertificatetrading,or“bookandclaim”,istechnicallynotachain-of-custodymethodbecausebeyondthecrudepalm-oilmillthecertifiedproductisnotseparatedfromthephysicalsupplychainandtheendproductdoesnotnecessarilycontaincertifiedpalmoil.Forthepalm-oilindustry,thisoptionisalsoknownasGreenPalmcertificates(afterthenameofthecompanymanagingthesystemfortheRSPO).Itisacertificatetradingsystemseparatefromthephysicaltradeinpalmoil.Ifthemill,forexample,produces100tonnesofcertifiedCrudePalmOil,thenitissuesvolumecertificatesforthatsameamount,whichgoesintotheglobalsupplychain.ThebenefitofCertificateTradingisthatnopapertrailorphysicalseparationofoilalongthesupplychainisneeded,andthereforeitisamuchcheaperthatotheroptionsrequiringphysicalseparation.ItalsomeansthatcompaniesusingderivativesofpalmoilthatarenotyetavailableastraceableCertifiedSustainablePalmOilcanstillbuycertificatestosupporttheproductionofCertifiedSustainablePalmOil.ThedownsideisthatcompaniesthatbuycertificatestoclaimcertifiedCrudePalmOilcouldcontinuesourcingfromproducerswhoarenotactingresponsibly.Duetothelowcostsandeasyaccess,downstreamfirmsstilllargelyadoptCertificateTrading,whichonlycostsanextra0.3%comparedwithconventionalpalmoilsoldontheinternationalmarket.EventhoughGreenPalmisconsideredanimportantsteptowardstraceablecrudepalmoil,thequestionarisesastowhethersuchatransitionislikelytooccur.MassbalanceMassbalanceallowsthemixingofcertifiedandnon-certifiedoilderivativesinanystepoftheprocess;therefore,palmoilpresentinendproductscannotbetracedbacktotheplantationoreventothecrudepalmoilmill.Thismethodbalancesthevolumeofcertifiedproductthatgoesintotheprocessingchainwiththevolumeofendproductlabelledascertified.Itistheleast-expensivechain-of-custodymethod,andthemostcommonlyused.Theadvantageofmassbalanceisthatitcanaccommodateatransitiontofullytraceableproductsatvastindustrialscalesthatwouldbenearlyimpossibletodowithmorestringentmethods,suchassegregationoridentitypreserved.Simpleimprovementsinrecordkeepingcanprovideincreasedtraceability.SegregatedThismethodtreatscertifiedandnon-certifiedpalmoilasseparateproductsanddoesnotallowthemixingofthetwoatanystageofprocessing,althoughthemixingcertifiedoilfromdifferentmillsisallowed.Costsarehigherthanformassbalancebecauseshippingcontainersandstoragetanksneedtobesegregatedforcertifiedproduct.Althoughamillcouldchoosetofacilitatethesegregationofcertifiedandnon-certifiedpalmoilduringprocessing(byrunningcertifiedbatchesatacertaintime,orhavingseparateprocessinglines),economiesofscalewouldmostlikelydictatethatthemillwouldneeditsentiresupplysourcetobecertified.IdentitypreservedIdentitypreservedgoesastepfurtherthansegregationinthatitdoesnotallowthemixingofcertifiedoilderivativesfromdifferentmills;therefore,certifiedpalmoilcanbetracedbacktothemill,evenattheendproductstage.Validatingwhetherdeforestationoccurredasaresultofplantationestablishmentorexpansioncouldbedoneontheentireareaofthe‘supplyshed’.Ofallthechain-of-custodymethods,identifypreservedisthemostcostly;giventheeconomiesofscalethatgoverncommodities,thismethodislikelytobepossibleonlyifamill’sentiresupplysourceiscertified.Source:[34]
![Page 48: Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on ... · Zero deforestation initiatives and their impacts on commodity supply chains Discussion paper prepared for the 57th Session](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022022805/5ca7aef588c99397078bb719/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
I6857EN/1/03.17