zeolites characterization by inverse gas chromatography ... · inverse gas chromatography (igc)...

1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 15 20 25 30 35 Carbon Number or ! T G a [kJ/mol] BEA SIlicalite–1 References G.M. DORRIS, D.G. GRAY; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 77 (1980), 353-362 E. BRENDLE, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 194 (1) 207-216 (1997) E. BRENDLE, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 194 (1) 217-224 (1997) C. SAINT FLOUR, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 91 (1) 69-75 (1983). V. GUTMANN, “The Donor-Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions“, Plenum Press, New York (1978) Acknowledgement Jean Daou from the team Materials with Controlled Porosity from the Institute of Material Science of Mulhouse, UMR CNRS 7361, University of Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, France, for providing the zeolites samples. Contact: [email protected] Zeolites Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography: Precise, Easy & Significant E. Brendlé 1 , R. Dümpelmann 2 , M. Rückriem 3 , J. Adolphs 3 1 Adscientis S.A., Wittelsheim, France 2 Inolytix AG, Sisseln, Switzerland 2 POROTEC GmbH, Hofheim, Germany Summary Characterization of solids, e.g. Zeolites, by Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) delivers precise and unique values about surface energy, size exclusion and acid/base properties. Proven software, as our own development, experience and proven operation conditions are requirements, while the use of standard GCs allows great flexibility plus 2 channels. The BEA type zeolite has higher surface energy γ s d than Silicalite-1, 237 vs. 192 mJ/ m 2 , whereas Silicalite-1 shows a very strong size exclusion effect. BEA is more polar and has stronger electron donor (acid) and acceptor (base) properties. Standard GC, 2 channels 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 10 20 30 40 Carbon Number or ! T G a [kJ/mol] BEA SIlicalite–1 cyclooctane isooctane s d γ = 1 CH 2 γ ΔG a (CH 2 ) 2. N . a CH 2 $ % & & ' ( ) ) 2 Principles of Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) 1. Samples (powder, fibers, flakes) are filled into column 2. Many probes are injected (n-alkanes, branched, polar, ...) 3. IGC-ID (infinite dilution): very low amount, symetrical peak Surface energy (γ s d ), nanoroughness, acid-base, G a , H a , S a 4. IGC-FC (finite concentration): high amount, asymetric peak Desorption isotherm, specific surface area, adsorption energy distribution function Proprietary software, efficient operation and data aquisition (Adscientis) Zeolites characterization by IGC-ID (infinite dilution) Dispersive Surface Energy (γ s d ) The method of determination of the dispersive component of the surface energy (γ s d ) has been pioneered by DORRIS and GRAY 1 . Linear alkanes are injected, here n-pentane, n-hexane, n- heptane. γ s d is independent of specific surface area, volume, flow rate etc., but ONLY if dilution is “infinite”. Two Zeolites are compared : BEA and Silicalite-1 BEA: S BET = 626 m 2 /g, V pores = 0.23 cm 3 /g , both are powder of microcystals Silicalite: S BET = 394 m 2 /g, V pores = 0.18 cm 3 /g N, Avogadro’s number γ CH2 the surface energy of a solid entirely constituted by CH2 groups (Poly ethylene) γ CH2 = 36,5 – 0,056.(T-20) [T in °C] a CH2 , the area of an adsorbed CH 2 group (6 Å 2 ) IMPORTANT: γ s d is only the dispersive, non-polar surface energy. iGC conditions: 10 mg, short column 1.5 mm ID, measurement: 150°C, 20 mL/min, 3x injections BEA has significantly higher γ s d with 237 mJ/m 2 than Silicalite-1 with 192 mJ/m 2 . Low error due to long-term experience. Surface Morphology (IM), i.e. nanoroughness, size exclusion The morphology index (IM) is given by the ratio of the retention volume of a branched alkane molecule V G (M) and V G (C) the retention volume of an n-alkane having the same accessibility to the solid’s surface. It is based on the topology index concept of molecules ( χ T ) and considers shape and Van der Waals volume 2 . This can be expressed as ratio of the retention volumes or derived from the free adsorption energy with similar results. 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 DN/AN ISP/AN BEA Silicalite–1 ether THF Me Acet. acetone CHCl 3 Bz ISP [kJ/mol] BEA Silicalite51 Acetone 19.6 ± 0.7 15.2 ± 1.1 THF 16.0 ± 0.6 11.8 ± 0.7 Ether 15.7 ± 0.5 11.3 ± 0.6 Chloroforme 9.3 ± 0.5 6.9 ± 0.7 Me>Acetate > 24 12.7 ± 1.0 Benzene 5.0 ± 0.7 >0.4 ± 1.0 Toluene 5.6 ± 0.8 >2.3 ± 0.9 o>xylene 6.3 ± 0.8 >16.1 ± 5.3 Acid%Base constants Ka Kb BEA 70.6 47.7 Silicalite%1 55.6 21.2 Surface energy ∆G a(CH 2 ) [kJ/mol] r 2 s d [mJ/m 2 ] BEA 5.90 ± 0.01 1.0000 237.5 ± 9.5 SilicaliteH1 5.30 ± 0.02 1.0000 192.0 ± 8.4 Silicalite-1 shows a very strong size exclusion effect for i-octane and cyclohexane, smaller, but significant effect for BEA. Quantitative and clear differentiation of adsorption behaviour and polar interactions is based on 8 probes. The two zeolites can be cleary differentiated by their electron donor and acceptor potential based on the retention times of known probes. strong size exclusion! retention time almost as CH4 IM = V G (M)/V G (C) V G (M) retention volume of branched alkane V G (C) retention volume of linear alkane Isooctane and cyclooctane have much shorter retention times than n-alkanes. This quantifies a size exclusion effect in a very useful way. Specific Interactions (ISP) The specific interaction parameter (ISP) is determined in relation to the reference n-alkane straight line 3 . It is expressed as the difference between a polar probe (ΔG a ) and the reference alkane molecule with non-polar, dispersive adsorption (ΔG a d ) 4 . By proper choices of injected probes (acid/base characteristics), the solid’s surface acid/base properties can also be assessed. ISP = ΔG a sp = ΔG a - ΔG a d Stronger polar interaction by BEA (higher ISP) than Silicalite-1 Determination of the acid and base constants (Ka, Kb) By injecting probes of known electron acceptor (AN) and donor numbers (DN), according to the semi-empirical acid/base scale of GUTMANN 5 , the ISP value can be related to acid and base constants Ka and Kb. ISP = DNKa + ANKb ISP/AN = (DN/AN)Ka + Kb BEA zeolite shows stronger interaction potential with higher electron donor (Ka= 70.6) and acceptor (Kb= 47.7) values than Silicalite-1. Example Ga(CH2) IM values IM isooctane IM cyclooctane BEA 0.15 ± 0.01 0.08 ± 0.01 Silicalite1 < 0.01 < 0.01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 10 20 30 40 Carbon Number or ! T G a [kJ/mol] BEA Silicalite–1 toluene o-xylene benzene CHCl 3 acetone THF ether Me acet. ISP for better readability: Ka*100, Kb*100

Upload: others

Post on 16-Jul-2020

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Zeolites Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography ... · Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) delivers precise and unique values about surface energy, size exclusion and acid/base

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 910

15

20

25

30

35

Carbon Number or !T

∆Ga

[kJ/

mol

]

BEASIlicalite–1

References G.M. DORRIS, D.G. GRAY; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 77 (1980), 353-362 E. BRENDLE, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 194 (1) 207-216 (1997) E. BRENDLE, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 194 (1) 217-224 (1997) C. SAINT FLOUR, E. PAPIRER ; J. Colloid Interface Sci. 91 (1) 69-75 (1983). V. GUTMANN, “The Donor-Acceptor Approach to Molecular Interactions“, Plenum Press, New York (1978)

Acknowledgement Jean Daou from the team Materials with Controlled Porosity from the Institute of Material Science of Mulhouse, UMR CNRS 7361, University of Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, France, for providing the zeolites samples. Contact: [email protected]

Zeolites Characterization by Inverse Gas Chromatography: Precise, Easy & Significant

E. Brendlé1, R. Dümpelmann2, M. Rückriem3, J. Adolphs3 1 Adscientis S.A., Wittelsheim, France

2 Inolytix AG, Sisseln, Switzerland 2 POROTEC GmbH, Hofheim, Germany

Summary Characterization of solids, e.g. Zeolites, by Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) delivers

precise and unique values about surface energy, size exclusion and acid/base

properties. Proven software, as our own development,

experience and proven operation conditions are requirements, while the use of standard GCs allows great flexibility plus 2 channels.

The BEA type zeolite has higher surface energy γs

d than Silicalite-1, 237 vs. 192 mJ/m2, whereas Silicalite-1 shows a very strong size exclusion effect. BEA is more polar and

has stronger electron donor (acid) and acceptor (base) properties.

Standard GC, 2 channels

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

10

20

30

40

Carbon Number or !T

∆Ga

[kJ/

mol

]BEASIlicalite–1

cycl

ooct

ane

isoo

ctan

e

s

dγ =

1

CH2γ

ΔGa (CH2)2.N.aCH2

$

% & &

'

( ) )

2

Principles of Inverse Gas Chromatography (IGC) 1.  Samples (powder, fibers, flakes) are filled into column 2.  Many probes are injected (n-alkanes, branched, polar, ...) 3.  IGC-ID (infinite dilution): very low amount, symetrical peak

ü  Surface energy (γsd), nanoroughness, acid-base, ∆Ga, ∆Ha, ∆Sa

4.  IGC-FC (finite concentration): high amount, asymetric peak ü  Desorption isotherm, specific surface area, adsorption energy distribution function

Proprietary software, efficient operation and data aquisition (Adscientis)

Zeolites characterization by IGC-ID (infinite dilution)

Dispersive Surface Energy (γsd)

The method of determination of the dispersive component of the surface energy (γs

d) has been pioneered by DORRIS and GRAY1. Linear alkanes are injected, here n-pentane, n-hexane, n-heptane. γs

d is independent of specific surface area, volume, flow rate etc., but ONLY if dilution is “infinite”.

Two Zeolites are compared: BEA and Silicalite-1 BEA: SBET = 626 m2/g, Vpores= 0.23 cm3/g , both are powder of microcystals Silicalite: SBET = 394 m2/g, Vpores= 0.18 cm3/g

•  N, Avogadro’s number •  γCH2 the surface energy of a solid entirely constituted by CH2

groups (Poly ethylene) γCH2 = 36,5 – 0,056.(T-20) [T in °C] •  aCH2, the area of an adsorbed CH2 group (6 Å2)

IMPORTANT: γsd is only the

dispersive, non-polar surface energy.

iGC conditions: 10 mg, short column 1.5 mm ID, measurement: 150°C, 20 mL/min, 3x injections

BEA has significantly higher γsd with 237 mJ/m2

than Silicalite-1 with 192 mJ/m2 . Low error due to long-term experience.

Surface Morphology (IM), i.e. nanoroughness, size exclusion The morphology index (IM) is given by the ratio of the retention volume of a branched alkane molecule VG(M) and VG(C) the retention volume of an n-alkane having the same accessibility to the solid’s surface. It is based on the topology index concept of molecules ( χT) and considers shape and Van der Waals volume2.

This can be expressed as ratio of the retention volumes or derived from the free adsorption energy with similar results.

0 1 2 3 4 50

1

2

3

4

DN/AN

ISP/AN

BEASilicalite–1

ethe

r

THF

Me

Ace

t.ac

eton

e

CH

Cl 3

Bz

ISP$[kJ/mol] BEA Silicalite51Acetone 19.6+±+0.7 15.2+±+1.1THF 16.0+±+0.6 11.8+±+0.7Ether 15.7+±+0.5 11.3+±+0.6Chloroforme 9.3+±+0.5 6.9+±+0.7Me>Acetate >+24 12.7+±+1.0Benzene 5.0+±+0.7 >0.4+±+1.0Toluene 5.6+±+0.8 >2.3+±+0.9o>xylene 6.3+±+0.8 >16.1+±+5.3

Acid%Base*constants Ka KbBEA 70.6 47.7Silicalite%1 55.6 21.2

Surface(energy ∆Ga(CH2)([kJ/mol] r2 !sd([mJ/m2]

BEA 5.90%±%0.01 1.0000 237.5(±(9.5

SilicaliteH1 5.30%±%0.02 1.0000 192.0(±(8.4

Silicalite-1 shows a very strong size exclusion effect for i-octane and cyclohexane, smaller, but significant effect for BEA.

Quantitative and clear differentiation of adsorption behaviour and polar interactions is based on 8 probes.

The two zeolites can be cleary differentiated by their electron donor and acceptor potential based on the retention times of known probes.

strong size exclusion!

retention time almost as CH4

IM = VG(M)/VG(C) •  VG(M) retention volume of branched alkane •  VG(C) retention volume of linear alkane

Isooctane and cyclooctane have much shorter retention times than n-alkanes. This quantifies a size exclusion effect in a very useful way.

Specific Interactions (ISP) The specific interaction parameter (ISP) is determined in relation to the reference n-alkane straight line3. It is expressed as the difference between a polar probe (ΔGa) and the reference alkane molecule with non-polar, dispersive adsorption (ΔGa

d)4.

By proper choices of injected probes (acid/base characteristics), the solid’s surface acid/base properties can also be assessed.

ISP = ΔGasp = ΔGa - ΔGa

d

Stronger polar interaction by BEA (higher ISP) than Silicalite-1

Determination of the acid and base constants (Ka, Kb) By injecting probes of known electron acceptor (AN) and donor numbers (DN), according to the semi-empirical acid/base scale of GUTMANN5, the ISP value can be related to acid and base constants Ka and Kb. ISP = DN�Ka + AN�Kb

ISP/AN = (DN/AN)�Ka + Kb

BEA zeolite shows stronger interaction potential with higher electron donor (Ka= 70.6) and acceptor (Kb= 47.7) values than Silicalite-1.

Example

∆Ga(CH2)

IM  values IM  isooctane IM  cyclooctaneBEA 0.15  ±  0.01 0.08  ±  0.01Silicalite-­‐1 <  0.01 <  0.01

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90

10

20

30

40

Carbon Number or !T

∆Ga

[kJ/

mol

]

BEASilicalite–1

tolu

ene

o-xy

lenebe

nzen

eCH

Cl 3

acet

one

THF

ethe

rM

e ac

et.

ISP

for better readability: Ka*100, Kb*100