yu xia, phd, member, ieee normann fischer, senior member, ieee schweitzer engineering laboratories
DESCRIPTION
A Comparison of Different Signal Selection Options and Signal Processing Techniques for Subsynchronous Resonance Detection. Yu Xia, PhD, Member, IEEE Normann Fischer, Senior Member, IEEE Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories. Outline. Existing Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) detection methods - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Copyright © SEL 2012
A Comparison of Different Signal Selection Options and Signal Processing Techniques for Subsynchronous Resonance Detection
Yu Xia, PhD, Member, IEEE
Normann Fischer, Senior Member, IEEE
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories
Outline
• Existing Subsynchronous Resonance (SSR) detection methods
• Signal input options
• Signal processing tools
• Application results
• Conclusions
Background
• Series compensated lines
• Types of SSR
1. Induction Generator Effect
2. Subsynchronous Torsional Interaction
3. Subsynchronous Control Interaction
Challenges
• Low magnitude of oscillation
• Low frequency range
• Tight response time requirement (Speed)
• High amplitude of fault current
• Avoid false trips (Security)
• Recognize SSR (Dependability)
Microprocessor based methods
• Patent by Southern California Edison
• Patent by ABB
• ERLphase method
Input signal options
• Negative sequence current
• Voltage across the series capacitors
• Generator terminal currents and voltages
• Generator speed
DFT result for voltage and current of the capacitor bank
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
5
10
15
20
X: 35.4Y: 19.27
Frequency, Hz
Vol
tage
, kV
DFT result of voltage and current of the capacitor bank
X: 60Y: 17.9
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
X: 60Y: 0.1624
Frequency, Hz
Cur
rent
, kA
X: 35.4Y: 0.1029
Real world event
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-1000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Time, sec
Cur
rent
, A
Generator current waveform for a real world SSR case
Application results (FT)
0 20 40 60 80 100 1200
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
X: 25Y: 380.9
Frequency, Hz
Mag
nitu
de,
ADFT result of IA
X: 60Y: 176.3
X: 95Y: 32.94
Conclusions (1)
• Existing SSR detection methods were reviewed.
• Different signal selection options and signal processing techniques were compared.
• Existing methods either do exclusively time domain analysis or exclusively frequency domain analysis.
Conclusions (2)
• STFT and WT decompose the signals in both time and frequency domain.
• WT overcomes the drawbacks of FT and show a clear relationship between the magnitudes of different frequency components and time.