youth sector outcomes framework
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Slide 1 The Young Foundation 2012
Moving to framework of outcomes for young peopleJanuary 2012
Bethia McNeil, The Young Foundation for the Catalyst Consortium, the Department for Education’s strategic partner for young people
Slide 2 The Young Foundation 2012
The sector lacks a common language and good process for sharing
knowledge
Not all youth sector providers are:• Considering their impact
as part of their core business; or
• Presenting outcomes in a consistent way.
Not all commissioners are:• Specifying social
outcomes in tenders; or• Accounting for social
impact in a ‘smart’ way when buying goods and services.
Not all investors are:• Accounting for social
impact in a way that is appropriate for the youth sector when making investment decisions; or
• Asking investees to report on their social impact.
What’s the problem?
Slide 3 The Young Foundation 2012
What’s our ambition for the framework? 1. Accepted by key champions amongst commissioners,
providers and social investors
2. Bold, yet flexible
3. Straight forward to use whilst also reasonably robust
4. Based on a coherent ‘theory of change’
5. Enabling benchmarking of ‘value added’, taking forward knowledge on ‘what works’
6. Use of a common language to promote consistent measurement of the difference services make for young people
Slide 4 The Young Foundation 2011
The framework of outcomes aims to underpin answers to five key questions for young people’s services 1. What are we trying to achieve?
To build consensus on what we aim to achieve with and for young people
2.What difference do services make?To measure the change in outcomes from services for young people
3.Why should someone commission, fund or invest in a service?To articulate the value of a youth service or programme
4. With limited resource, who and what is our focus? To target and tailor support for different young people 5. How can we make the biggest difference for young people?To inform practice and the sector’s development
Slide 5 The Young Foundation 2012
How might the outcomes framework be used, and by whom?
Audience Why might they use the framework?
What attributes do they need the framework to have?
Commissioners (e.g. Local Authorities)
• To target resources effectively to local needs
• To intelligently commission a range of services which ‘speak’ to one another
• To share best practice
• Allows comparability across providers
• Clear to understand• Reliable/evidence based/robust
Providers (e.g. youth services)
• To demonstrate the difference made for young people
• To articulate value• To improve services for
young people• To grow the evidence
base• To build consensus• To benchmark the
difference they make to young people
• Flexible and adaptable to their context
• Easy to use• Affordable• Low resource intensity• Recognised by central/local
government, commissioners and investors
Investors (e.g. central government, philanthropists)
• To help decide between competing priorities
• To inform investment decisions
• To understand the potential of the sector
• Allow comparability across providers
• Low resource intensity • Clear to understand• Reliable/evidenced based/robust• Sit alongside existing impact
measurement tools
Slide 6 The Young Foundation 2012
Outputs of the framework
• Typology of outcome areas - ‘cluster model’
• Case studies on how outcomes framework can be used in practice
• Table highlighting a small number of established tools
Slide 7 The Young Foundation 2012
How have we developed an answer?
• Focus groups (young people, commissioners, funders etc)
• Advisory group
• Consultation across the sector
• Literature review
Slide 8 The Young Foundation 2012
Outcomes: what matters?
Slide 9 The Young Foundation 2012
Key to our approach is a link between capabilities, intrinsic and extrinsic outcomes …
Educational Development
Results In
Increased Protective Factors
Decreased Risk
Factors
Producing
Personal Development
SocialDevelopment
Intrinsic Outcomes (individual well-being)
Extrinsic Outcomes (wider social good)
Slide 10 The Young Foundation 2012
… that can be summarised as a relationship between long-term outcomes, interim indicators, social & emotional capabilities
Slide 11 The Young Foundation 2012
… which is supported by a strong evidence base …
Slide 12 The Young Foundation 2012
At the heart of the Outcomes Framework are seven clusters of capabilities
Slide 13 The Young Foundation 2011
Consistency across frameworks
Dartington SRU - key developmental outcomes
1. Educational skills and attainment 2. Emotional wellbeing 3. Physical health 4. Positive behavior 5. Positive relationships
New Philanthropy Capital
Self-esteem Resilience Emotional wellbeing Peer relationships Family relationships Satisfaction with school environment Satisfaction with local community
Fairbridge
Communicating, Managing feelings, Establishing interpersonal relationships,
Understanding social values, Understanding and identifying with others,
Negotiating, Problem solving, Planning, Reviewing
AQR Mental Toughness
1. Control
2. Challenge
3. Commitment
4. Confidence
Slide 14 The Young Foundation 2012
Using the Outcomes Framework
Slide 15 The Young Foundation 2012
Stages in using the Framework
Slide 16 The Young Foundation 2012
Case study: provider working with victims of bullying
Slide 17 The Young Foundation 2012
Step 1: What’s the need?Young people in the local area have been victims of bullying. They have suffered from physical and verbal abuse and their school
attendance has worsened. 15 young people have been referred to the scheme.
Resilience & Determination
Managing Feelings
Confidence & Agency
Communication
Step 2: Planned outputs & outcomes
Provide refuge/safe-place
Provide supported activities to build social ands emotional skills
Work with schools to stop the bullying
Step 3: Which clusters?
Step 4: Service design
Activity C
Local Authority funded therapist who can provide a two hour session once a week
Activity B
3 volunteers who can each devote an evening a week (6 till 9 pm)
Training sessions with teachers
Activities Inputs
Use of church hall two evenings a week (4pm till 9.30pm)
1 full time dedicated member of staff
Activity A
Case study: provider working with victims of bullying
Slide 18 The Young Foundation 2012
Case study: provider working with victims of bullying
Slide 19 The Young Foundation 2012
Matrix of tools
Slide 20 The Young Foundation 2012
• We have collated information on commonly-used and referenced measurement tools and techniques
• Information includes an overview of which clusters are covered; the cost of using the tool; and the robustness of the underlying evidence base
Approach to assessing tools
Slide 21 The Young Foundation 2012
Slide 22 The Young Foundation 2012
Next steps • Pilot phase
For example, applied in LGA/NYA case study work with councils on investment analysis
• Generating knowledge Continuing to gather information on tools and
their use Working with groups of practitioners and analysts
to share data and experiences
• Encouragement from commissioners and funders