youth futures - gypl integrative seminar 03 nov 07
DESCRIPTION
Arthur Harkins and John Moravec presentation from Global Youth Policy Leadership seminar 03 November 2007TRANSCRIPT
Youth Futures:Youth Futures:Leapfrogging from Century 18 Leapfrogging from Century 18
to Century 21to Century 21
Youth Futures:Youth Futures:Leapfrogging from Century 18 Leapfrogging from Century 18
to Century 21to Century 21For:For:
GYPL Integrative SeminarGYPL Integrative Seminar03 November 0703 November 07Arthur HarkinsArthur HarkinsJohn MoravecJohn Moravec
The New Context Paradigm
• Increasing importance of creative human capital
• Increasing rates of change• Increasingly inaccurate predictions• Increasing need to create preferred
futures• Increasing sense that kids must share
creation of new futures with adults
…also…• Today’s kids participate in an
increasingly globalized world• Industrial society has given way to
the knowledge-based society …which is already starting to
transition to an innovation and creativity society
Which paradigm do we Which paradigm do we place our kids in?place our kids in?
First Proposition Set• Kids are vastly under-utilized as human capital• Kids can be brought into full relationship with the
exploding knowledge/innovation economy• Advanced educational technology will be required• “New” Workforce incorporating kids will be more
creative and much larger than present workforce• “Shadow Schools” are one approach to the re-
integration of children, adults, and the economy
Legacy: USA Century 18
• Farming/agriculture economy• Family based enterprises• Kids learned at home• Kids worked at home• Kids were engaged cross-generationally• Adults could learn from kids• Kids contributed at all economic levels
Legacy: USA Centuries Late 19th- Mid-20th
• Industrial economy• Job/wage/salary based enterprises• Kids learned increasingly at schools• Kids worked at low level, sometimes
dangerous jobs• Kids were engaged cross-generationally as
chattel, hirelings, or de facto (and de jure) slaves
• Kids learned from adults within division of age and labor formats
• Kids still contributed at all economic levels
Lasting Legacy Effects: USA Century 21
• Emerging knowledge/innovation economy is stunted• Integrated activities between adults/kids are highly
limited• Kids and adults learn less and less from each other• Adults anxious about/fear learning from kids• Kids separated from adults, following legacy industrial
economy model• Kids work mainly at menial tasks• Kids still contribute to all economic levels, but at far
lower levels than possible, feasible, and desirable
Moving from Legacy Millstones to New Futures
Leapfrogging…• means leadership rather than catching
up.• means using advanced (wireless)
technologies to assist students and teachers
• technologies permit moving from memorization to creative and innovative knowledge production
“New” Workforce Effects: USA Century 21 -
Leapfrog• Emerging knowledge/innovation economy can get a
quantum boost• Integrated activities can partner kids with adults• Adults are eager to learn from kids• Kids and adults learn more about each other• Kids and adults partner and collaborate, teaching to
and learning from each other• Kids work increasingly at creative tasks • Kids still contribute to all economic levels, but with
better distribution of effort than in the past
What’s it Going to Take?
• Voluntary establishment of “Shadow Schools”
• Voluntary participation by kids and adults
• Screened volunteers representing retired staff, graduate students, professionals, etc.
• Donations and grants for insurance costs, food, transportation
What Should be Avoided?
• Pressures on NCLB-strapped teachers• Pressures on adults and kids to
participate• Competition with legacy school functions
and personnel• Race, class, and attitude challenges• Low expectations and standards• Undue fanfare
What Should be Sought?
(Leapfrog!)• Top-flight volunteers from all
appropriate sectors• Use of latest technologies, including
Beta devices and software from partnering companies
• Excellent Web connectivity among Shadow Schools
• Collaborative relationships with similar schools in the US and abroad
Second Proposition Set• Mirror the creative workforce first and
foremost• Functionality first and foremost• Technology supports reliable
functionality• Every kid and adult a Creative• Every kid and adult an Innovator• NO FAILURES• Global leadership from Day 1
What is Our Role Today?
• Discuss merits/problems• Discuss enhancements• Discuss alternatives• Discuss implementation scenarios• Discuss early planning options• Discuss involvement of school partners• Discuss involvement of industry, business partners• Discuss involvement of technology collaborators• Discuss help from funding sources for insurance, food,
transportation
Some Questions• Is “Shadow Schools” the right language?• How about “Innovation Institutes” (or
“Creativity Labs” or “Creativity Centers”)?• Can/should the U of M and other colleges
get involved as collaborators?• Should a Web entity be established for
creativity and innovation among kids/adults and their collaborators?
Which Would You Rather See in the Next
5 Years?• Kids starting corporations with adults or
kids learning to despise “smart people?”• Kids working for Microsoft and Google or
kids running drugs?• Kids looking forward to exciting futures
or kids awaiting death or prison?• Kids who can change the world for the
better or kids dismissed by the world?
Responses – Fire Away!!