TMmini

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

TMballoon

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

micro

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

2.8-4.8

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

2.8-5.0

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

TM6.0-8.0

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

www.pullthru.net.nz

Premium Endoscope Channel Cleaning BrushThe Assurance of 5 Cleaning Actions™

Scienti�cally proven improvement over existing brush technology*

FORM A01

Your Brush of Choice for Channels

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

“FEEL THE CLEAN”™

This �ushing action helps remove remaining soil from scratches in

the channel

Ensures there is detergent in the channel to attack any

remaining �lm

The PULL THRU™ imposes a uniform action for cleaning the channels, reducing

cleaning variation and improving infection control

A uniform cleaning action = Reduction in deviations in cleaning protocols (Note 2)

(Note 1) Timothy S Charlton. A comparison of the e�cacy of lumen - cleaning devices for �exible gastroin-testinal endoscopes. Aust infect Control 2007; 12(3): 81-90

(Note 2) “...minor deviations from cleaning protocols resulted in persistent microbiological contamination after disinfection” Deva et al. Detection of persistent vegetative bacteria and ampli�ed viral nucleic acid from in-use testing of gastrointestinal endoscopes. J Hosp Inf 1998;39:1 49-157

Please Note: The Endoscope channel must be brushed until clean.

Improving the e�cacy of the mechani-cal clean, the 360 degree circumferential seal allows the PULL THRU™ to remove at least 96% of the debris 100% of the

time (Note1)

Enhances the e�cacy of the deter-gent soak that is used in the sink to

manually clean the scopes by creating a uniform �lm for the detergent to attack in a more e�ective manner

The Assurance of 5 Cleaning Actions™

Trademarks are the property of the respective ownersCopyright F R Galantai Manufacturing 2017 01 Auckland City, 0602

11 Bancroft Crescent

New Zealand

F R Galantai Manufacturing Limited Priory Analysts Ltd The Pinnacle160 Midsummer BoulevardMilton KeynesMK9 1FFUnited Kingdom

EC REP

Charlton Study, Aust Infect Control 2007; 12(3):81-90

The Charlton study measures the weight of pre loaded soil removed after a single pass of the PULL THRU™ versus six passes of the bristle brushes the comparison was made against

P < 0.00

aba

A.100

80

60

40

20

0PULL THRU™

% R

emov

ed

Triple Single Reusable

b

P < 0.00

aab

b

B.100

80

60

40

20

0PULL THRU™

% R

emov

ed

Triple Single Reusable

a

Figure 3. Percent of soil removed (Mean ± SD) from the lumenafter passage of the lumen-cleaning device.: A. 2.8 mm (new)lumen, B. 2.8 mm (old) lumen, C. 5.0 mm (old) lumen.

P < 0.00

bb

C.100

80

60

40

20

0PULL THRU™

% R

emov

ed

Triple Single

100908070605040302010

Re-use brush

Re-use brush

Single-use brush

Single-use brush

PULL THRU™

PULL THRU™ wipes

% ATP (removed)

51,462,68

81,08

Summary of Scienti�c Papers

(2012 03)

(2011 11)

(2007)

University Hospitals BirminghamNHS Foundation Trust

1 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

PULL THRU™ Device Cleaning Brush

TestVisual

InspectionNinhydrin

testNumber

ofpasses

Visual Inspection

Ninhydrintest

Number of

passes

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

No soil

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

Negative Negative

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

>5

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

Scanty soil

The Birmingham study assessed the performance of a PULL THRU™ Cleaning Brush after one (1) pass through a pre contami-nated channel against a bristle brush after �ve (5) passes through the channel using a Ninhydrin test to measure detect-able protein and a visual inspection was made to detect soil

The results indicate that a single pass of the PULL THRU™ is as e�ective as 5 passes of the bristle brush tested against.

The Deventer study compares the amount of protein removal in the channel of a range of colonoscopes after brushing with a reusable bristle brush, a single use bristle brush and a PULL THRU™

The device was passed down the channel of the colonoscope once when the scope was manually cleaned

The protein loading in the channels was measured prior and subsequent to cleaning see Page 7 for the technique and pages 14-16 for the results

The results on Page 6 show the performance of the three devices

Deventer Study

TMmini

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

TMballoon

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

micro

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

2.8-4.8

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES2.8-5.0

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

TM6.0-8.0

PULL THRUENDOSCOPES

More than one PULL THRU™ channel cleaning brush maybe required to clean endoscopes with more than one channel ID FORM 10

ZZ0112+1+SPUP+2200 ZZ0112+60+DC+2200 ZZ0112+180+0+2200

ZZ1426+180+0+2200

ZZ2848+180+0+2200

ZZ1426+60+DC+2200

ZZ2848+60+DC+2200

ZZ2850+60+DC+2200

ZZ01426+1+SPUP+2200

ZZ2848+1+SPUP+2200

ZZ2850+1+SPUP+2200

ZZ2850+1+SPUP+2500

ZZ0608+1+SPUP+2200

ZZ0112+1+SPUP+2200/NS*

ZZ01426+1+SPUP+2200/NS*

ZZ2848+1+SPUP+2200/NS*

ZZ2850+1+SPUP+2200/NS*

ZZ2850+1+SPUP+2500/NS*

ZZ0608+1+SPUP+2200/NS*

PULL THRU™ Channel Cleaning Brush for endoscope channels.

Refer to the Instructions for Use

1.4-2.6mm2200mm

2.8-4.8mm2200mm

2.8-5.0mm2200mm

2.8-5.0mm2500mm

6.0-8.0mm1290mm

1.0-1.2mm2200mm

Channel IDLength Description

Your Brush of Choice for Channels

PULL THRUTM

ENDOSCOPES

Single Patient User Pack

Sealed Plastics Bag of 1 x PULL THRU™

1 x STUBBY BRUSH™/NS* (no STUBBY)

Box of 60

PULL THRU™ c/w Cassette and Wall Mount

Box of60 x PULL THRU™

1 x Cassette with Wall mount

PULL THRU™ Re�ll Pack for Cassette

Box of 3 x 60 PULL THRU™