you can also change it: who owns the shore? the case of lake victoria paul onyango department of...
Post on 15-Jan-2016
216 views
TRANSCRIPT
You can also change it: Who owns the Shore?
The Case of Lake Victoria
Paul OnyangoDepartment of Aquatic Sciences and
FisheriesUniversity of Dar es Salaam
Lecture Time Plan
• Lecture 1.5 hrs• Film 30 mins• Discussion• Wrap-up
Outline of Lecture
• Introduction– Tanzania– Lake Victoria
• Challenges • Concept of ownership – of the shore
• Traditional society (Customary or communal)• Post colonial period Management rights, co-
management)
• Values inherent in ownership of the shore– Film
Key message
• Social justice is embedded in a communicty social system– It is part of what communities tries to
achieve as they relate and undertake their daily activities.
Tanzania
Some statistics
Size (land area) 945,087 sq kmPopulation 39,384,223Age structure 0-14 -44%
15-64 53.3%> 65 yrs 2.8%
Ethnic groups Over 120 tribesReligion Christian, Muslims,
IndigenousLiteracy 70%
Economic activities• Service sector – Hotel– Printing– Education– Health– Storage and communication– Banking and insurance– Real estate– Business services:- software development, dta
and processing,architectural, engineering and other technical consultancy, advertisement
– Public administartion and defence
Agriculture
Fishing
11
River Nile Lake Tanganyika
Mt Kilimanjaro
Tourism
Industry and construction
Summary of other facts
• Population is predominantly rural• Over 80% of population depend on
agriculture• Poverty is widespread• Has substantial minearls such as Gold
and Tanzanite
Lake Victoria
Map of Lake Victoria
Some Lake Victoria statistics
ITEM Quantity (2010)Ethnic communities
Over 10
Main activities Agriculture and FishingNumber of fishermen
Appr. 200,000
Crafts About 68,000Fishing gears Gillnets, hooks, long linesLanding sites Over 1000
Issues affecting Lake Victoria fishing communities
• Inequitable distribution of earnings
• Access to some basic facitlities i.e.
health, schools
• conflicts
• Poverty
• Malnutrition
• Lack of regulatory rights
CONCEPT OF OWNERSHIP
Possession of or holding of a resource with the associated full rights to use
Tracing ownership through history
Migrations and settlement
Some ethnic communities riaprian to Lake Victoria•Wakiseru•Wakerewe•Wasukuma•Wahaya•Waluo•Wazinza
Wakiseru
Wakerewe
• Migration• Wars• Activities• Fishing trips
What is valuable?• Land: The value on land led them to migrate
from several places to where they are presently settled
• Cultural and social values: distinctive experiences that gave a unique status or reputation– These were considered valuable in as much as they
were used to advance in social relations– These valuables were therefore institutionalised
and became central issues in rules and regulations of these communities
– These valuables could be observed in their definition of land and ownership rules and regulations
Customary or communal ownership system
• Title to land (other resources) based on traditions and customs of respective tribes. – Ownership was communal i.e. family, clan or
tribe. Chiefs, headmen and elders had the powers of land administration in trust for the community.
– Access to fish and fishing grounds open to allGuaranteed Access rights
Ownership system: post colonial period
• Management rights
–Territorial use right:- national, regional, district territories were established (Migingo and Ugingo Island dispute)
Map of Lake Victoria showing National and District Territories
Source: LVFO
Property regimes
• state property: If resource users have the duty to observe rules and norms of use/access determined by a government institution that has the right of its management
• private property: If the fishers who have the right to decide on socially acceptable uses of the resource, even though they have the duty to abstain from destructive uses
•In open access (res nullius) conditions, the resource as property does not exist, and thus any member of society could harvest the resource
Ownership system: post colonial period
• Co-management– Community ownership of management
process:- community given Fisheries Laws and regulations
– Government ownership of fish resources
YES % NO1) Ownership of Lake Victoria by Community and Government
95 5
Perception on ownership of fish resources after a BMU training in 2007
Source: IFMP Fisheries Management National Coordination Office, Tanzania
Short break
Values inherent in ownership
• Equity:- perceptions of fairness in distributions of resources among various
actors in the fishing communities i.e during fishing trip among the Wakerewe
• Legitimacy:- the capacity of ownership arrangement to bring about and maintain the
belief that tenure institutions are the most appropriate
and proper ones for the community
Values cont’d
• Order: At individual level, it is the ability to avoid violence and cherish peace, and harmony and being able
to reach agreement with others. – At the community level, it is considered
as a state in which community regularized pattern of behaviour is
perceived as a moral obligation for all members.
• Ownership arrangement which enables behaviour of fishers to respect one another
– a very simple value but pivotal to the healthy continuation of any relationship,
whether it is between two people, different races and/or religions, different species– It underlies fishers’ relationship, group
interests, language and behaviour
Values inherent in ownership
Respect shown through dressing
Respect
Fishers pooling a boat from the water
Cooperation
Source: http://www.wildmanstevebrill.com/Radio%20Pages/WBAIShows.html
• Ownership which enhances cooperation between and among fishers
– part of the accepted fabric of fishing society which is take into account when formulating
behaviour and getting involved in the community life.
• When institutionalised, respect and cooperation among other values becomes
the real world of the fishers and their social system – tenure system
Film
Wrap-up – Community social system
• A social system is where everyday life is routinely enacted (See also Parsons 1951)– Expectations and patterns– Grounded on community values
• Social justice is also grounded on a community social system
• Social justice is a prerequisite for development