yehud! menuhin / robert masters / gecil aronowitz / …
TRANSCRIPT
STE R'E O
YEHUD! MENUHIN / ROBERT MASTERS / GECIL ARONOWITZ / ERNST WALLFISCH / MAURICE GENDRON / DEREK SIMPSON J6234
ALLEGRO FROM THE F-A-E SONATA: HEPHZIBAH AND YEHUDI MENUHIN
RUBENS: LANDSCAPE WITH RAINBOW-MUSEE DES BEAUX- ARTS, VALENCIENNES, FRANCE PHOTO: GIRAUDON
Library of Congress Catalog Card Numbers R 64-1509 (mono) and R 64-1510 (stereo) apply to this recording.
IN (FS) vst
te
Can Be Filed Under: Chamber Music * Menuhin
Johannes Brahms
SEXTET NO.1 IN B FLAT, Op. 18
From left to right: Yehudi Menuhin, Robert Masters, Ernst Wallfisch, Cecil Aronowitz, Derek Simpson and Maurice Gendron.
Yehudi Menuhin & Robert Masters (violins )
Cecil Aronowitz & Ernst Wallfisch (violas )
Maurice Gendron & Derek Simpson (cellos )
I. Allegro ma non troppo [side 1, band 1 — 12’08’’]
II. Andante, ma Moderato [side 1, band 2 — 10’29’]
III. Scherzo (Allegro molto) & Trio (Animato) [side 2, band 1 — 3’00’’]
IV. Rondo (Poco Allegretto e grazioso ) [side 2, band 2 — 11’16’’]
[Total: 36753’7]
ALLEGRO (Third Movement of the F-A-E Sonata)
[side 2, band 3 — 6’05”’]
Yehudi Menuhin (violin) & Hephzibah Menuhin (piano)
& © & HOW VALUABLE to Brahms was the friend-
ship of the violinist Joachim may be gauged from the opening of this Sextet for strings,
a passage that owes its final form to a sug-
gestion Joachim made to the composer. Not only did Joachim contribute to the success
of the work by taking part in its earliest per- formances (1860); at that time he also used
to help Brahms by criticizing his works, which Brahms sent to him for this purpose,
before they were published.
The B flat Sextet, the first of Brahms’ two essays in this medium, originally began
at what is now its eleventh bar. Joachim pointed out that the modulation to D flat
in the theme’s twelfth bar came too quickly. (Mozart, in the Musical Joke, had satirized
composers who left their key before estab-
lishing it firmly enough, and it was a trap
that Weber was apt to fall into.) On
Joachim’s advice, Brahms altered the fully
scored statement of the first leg of the theme into a counter-statement, preceding
it with a statement on the first cello. This makes the modulation more satisfying when
it does come, and later in the movement,
at the start of the recapitulation, it has the effect of intensifying the contrast of the
quite different modulation made there by altering the rhythmic proportions of the
theme as well as its harmonic progress.
Another cardinal point that may be ob-
served in these opening bars — and here it is the genius of Brahms himself that is dem- onstrated — is their irregular number. The
reason why this masterpiece, for all its
apparent leisureliness, never drags lies in its freedom of phrase-length. This is a feature that almost always distinguishes the master from the merely competent composer, who
can usually be recognized at once by his un- varying succession of 4- or 8-bar phrases.
The second movement is square in
thythm, but for one thing this is perfectly permissible in a variation movement, as
opposed to one that proceeds by develop- ment. And for another the sheer depth of
feeling of the noble D minor theme, so obviously Hungarian-Gypsy in inspiration,
and the richness and subtlety of its treat-
ment, especially in the almost unbearably
PHOTO: AXEL POIGNANT
beautiful 4th and 5th variations, make this the greatest of the four movements in qual-
ity of inspiration.
The third movement carries freedom to
even greater lengths than the first, especially in the trio, where the phrases overlap in
such a tumultuous manner that to count their length is a hopeless undertaking. This supremely classical procedure of turning the
end of one phrase into the beginning of
the next is finely exemplified again in the middle of the second occurrence of the finale’s rondo theme: here the first violin’s
cadence phrase turns out to have been, before we realized it, the first bar of the
theme. Such are the touches of combined inspiration and workmanship that keep
even this superficially languorous movement plentifully supplied with inner momentum. Nor should it be thought, any more than
with the finale of the second Piano Con- certo, that the emotional lightness of the
last two movements is out of place in a
context of such sublimity: a work is better with one supreme peak than with two, and
the 27-year-old composer’s fineness of judg- ment is shown by the sense of balance that
makes his scherzo and finale an ideal foil to what has gone before.
ky * aa
The C minor Scherzo for violin and piano
is the movement Brahms contributed to a
composite sonata written in 1853 with his friends Albert Dietrich, who wrote the first
movement, and Schumann, who contrib-
uted an intermezzo and finale. Written to
greet Joachim when he arrived in Diissel- dorf, it was called the F.A.E. Sonata after his motto, ‘‘Frei aber einsam” (‘‘free but
lonely’’). Brahms based his movement on the first subject of Dietrich’s.
Note © 1964 BERNARD JACOBSON
MORE BY YEHUDI MENUHIN ON ANGEL
(S) indicates Stereo.
BAcH: The Musical Offering, BWV 1079.
With Elaine Shaffer, flute; members of the Bath Festival Orchestra. (S) 35731
HANDEL: The Twelve Concerti grossi, Op.
6. Bath Festival Orchestra. (S)D-3647 MozART: Sinfonia concertante in FE flat,
K.364; nAayDN: Violin Concerto No. 1 in C. With Rudolf Barshai, viola (in the
Mozart) and the Bath Festival Orchestra. (S) 36190
BERLIOZ: Harold in Italy. Yehudi Menuhin,
viola; Philharmonia Orchestra, Colin
Davis cond. (S) 36123 RAVEL: Trio in A minor; MozART: Trio No.
5 in E, K.542. With Gaspar Cassado, cello, and Louis Kentner, piano.
(S) 35630 BLocH: Concerto for Violin and Orchestra
(1938). Philharmonia Orchestra, Paul
Kletzki cond. (S) 36192
STEREO S 36234
05