yearly conference on productivity at saltsjöbaden 2011

31
Yearly conference on productivity at Saltsjöbaden 2011 Annette Nylund Ph.D. Cand. at Royal Institute of Technology. KTH. Department of Industrial Economics and Management. INDEK. Researcher at Swedish Environment Authority 2011-10-05 1

Upload: rhoda

Post on 16-Mar-2016

32 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Yearly conference on productivity at Saltsjöbaden 2011. Annette Nylund Ph.D. Cand. at Royal Institute of Technology. KTH. Department of Industrial Economics and Management. INDEK. Researcher at Swedish Environment Authority 2011-10-05. Signpost. The background - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Yearly conference on productivity at

Saltsjöbaden 2011Annette Nylund 

Ph.D. Cand. at Royal Institute of Technology. KTH.Department of Industrial Economics and Management. INDEK.

Researcher at Swedish Environment Authority

2011-10-05

1

Page 2: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Signpost

• The background

• Articles that explore data and theory• New article about two management models

and their prediction on productivity

• Conclusion..?

2011-10-052

Page 3: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

3

• evaluations of the relevance• costs • benefits of initiatives...

3

Sixth and Seventh European Research Framework Programmes

EU Commission

2011-10-05

European policies evidence-based and built on

harmonized country data:

Page 4: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

2011-10-054

• EU project Meadow 2008 – 2010• Swedish Meadow Survey 2009/2010• Yearbook on productivity 2010• Book Learning organisations Matter 2011• Yearbook on productivity 2011• … about 10 papers are published• ... other papers and thesis 2011

New Guideline and new data

Page 5: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Articles based on Meadow...• Work organisation and competence

development in Swedish firms. 2010• Firms environment and competence

portfolio. 2011• Theoretical TQM principles versus the use of

contemporary strategies. in progress 2011• Two management models predicting

productivity; TQM compared with used contemporary bundles of practices of learning and work organisation. in progress 2011…

2011-10-055

Page 6: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Work organisation and competence development

in Swedish firms

in Statistics Sweden

Yearbook on productivity 2010

2011-10-056

Page 7: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Individual learning

Decentra-lisation

Numerical flexibility

Structural learning

Four Composite Indicators“exploring the black box”

72011-10-03

Page 8: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Incidences across…

• Firm sizes• Industries• Foreign or national ownership

2011-10-059

Page 9: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

10

Incidences across firm sizes. mean values

15-49 50-249 250+

Sum 2.11

0.45 0.40 0.40

1.91 2.08 2.27

Individual learning

Four composite indexes

Structural learning

Numerical flexibilityDecentralisation

Mean

0.650.700.320.43

The firms are weighted after their own industry's proportion of value added in the business sector.except for firms in the financial business sector since they still lack of harmonised value added data

0.56 0.61 0.73

0.63 0.69 0.770.26 0.35 0.38

Table 14 from Yearbook on productivity 2010

2011-10-05

Page 10: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Result of four regression models

11

INDIVIDUAL LEARNING

STRUCTURAL LEARNING

DECENTRALISATION NUMERICAL FLEXIBILITY

18 Industries

Foreign 

Small firms  -0.12***  -0.05***  -0.06*** 

Large firms  0.09**  0.05**  0.05*** 

Young_ < 35  -0.13** 

Old_ > 50  -0.24** 

HighEdc university1  0.15***  0.19*** 

LowEd compulsory2 

Women 3  0.06*  0.15**  0.09*** 1) University = ≥3 year or longer; 2) Compulsory school = 9 years schooling; 3) Woman. percentage*** High significance. 0.01 level. ** rather high significance. 0.05 level. * low significance. 0.10 level.

Table 19 from Yearbook on productivity 2010

2011-10-05

Page 11: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Firms environment and competence portfolio

in Statistics Sweden

Learning organisations Matter 2011

2011-10-0512

Page 12: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Individual learning

Decentra-lisation

Numerical flexibility

Structural learning

Four Composite Indicators“exploring the black box”

132011-10-05

Page 13: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

14

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

2011-10-05

Page 14: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

152011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 15: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

162011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 16: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

172011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 17: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

182011-03-31

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 18: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

192011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 19: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

202011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 20: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

212011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 21: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

222011-10-05

Latent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 22: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

23

Seven bundles of practices in Swedish firmsLatent hidden patterns - bundles of practices

Page 23: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Numerical

flexibility

Individual learning

Decentra-lisation

Structural learning

Four Composite Indicators“exploring the black box”

Structural learning

242011-10-05

Structural learning

Numerical flexibility

Seven bundels of practices“exploring the black box”

Page 24: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Boundaries of competence

• Outsourcing and cooperation; in design. production. procurement ... they cluster

• Cooperation in different R&D activities ... they cluster

• Foreign ownership and large size firms ... they cluster

• Customised versus standardised production

2011-10-0525

Page 25: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

No relationship in general between

Seven bundles of learning and work practices&

Firms boundaries

2011-10-0526

Page 26: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

2011-10-0527

Numerical flexibility&

Large sized firms &

Foreign ownership

No relationship in general betweenExcept

Page 27: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Two management models predicting productivity

TQM compared with used contemporary bundles of practices of learning and work

organisation

in Statistics Sweden

Yearbook on productivity 2011

2011-10-0528

Page 28: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Measurement in US (Hackman and Wageman. 1995). They are:i. Problem solving teamsii. Investment in trainingiii. CEO:s responsibility throughout the organisationiv. Supplier relationv. Customer preferencesvi. Bench marking

2010-06-0330

Six TQM principles

Page 29: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Regression models predicting value added per employee

Variables Significance level

Significance level

Significance level

Multi-index bundles of practices (multi7) 0.002    TQM six principles   0.02  TQM six principles + contr  contractors     0.07Also controlling for: Fact_work_contract Incl. in index not included 0.10Also included: HighEdPerc 0.001 0.0001 0.002

For_own 0.0001 0.69 0.003Percentage over 50 0.03 0.07 0.07ICT_Cust_Suppl_Syst 0.06 0.03 0.45WomenPerc 0.06 0.30 0.09

Also controlling for: Customised_ or standardised products; sizes of firm; 20 industry groups; part of a group of firms.

yes yes yes

R-Square (R2) 0.17 0.11 0.142011-10-05

32

Page 30: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Prel. conclusionThe bundles of used learning and work practices predicts higher productivity better than TQM

The difference between the two models is that •Firms using bundles include temporary contracts

•Firms using TQM includes instead:- cooperation and outsourcing

- cooperation with use of ICT - and cooperation in external R&D - many direct reporting departments to CEO

2011-10-0533

Page 31: Yearly conference on productivity at  Saltsjöbaden  2011

Thank You!

[email protected]

342011-10-05