xlri compensation
TRANSCRIPT
A study of
Estimating Cost to Government
For a government employee
Study conducted by
XLRI
The XLRI Team consists of
Prof. Premrajan
Prof. EM Rao
Prof. Gurunathan L
XLRI Jamshedpur
2
Estimating cost to government
Acknowledgements
The XLRI Team is thankful to the Sixth Pay commission for offering their support during
the entire length of the project. The XLRI team also thanks the representatives of all the
government sectors that offered their views and patiently answered the questions the team
asked them. We thank the numerous government employees who participated in the study
conducted by the team to elicit their views regarding the pay mix.
The team is especially thankful to Ms. Madhulika P. Shukul and Ms. Sheela Prasad for
their untiring efforts towards making this study what it is now. The team salutes their
dedication to their profession.
Prof. R. K. Premrajan
Prof. E. M Rao
Prof. Gurunathan L
XLRI Jamshedpur
3
Estimating cost to government
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........................................................................................................................2
1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY..................................................................................................10
2 DELIVERABLES ..............................................................................................................................12
3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................13
4 COST TO COMPANY –A PRIMER ...............................................................................................16
4.1 PAY AND ITS COMPONENTS ........................................................................................................ 16 4.2 COST TO COMPANY- A WORKING DEFINITION ............................................................................. 18 4.3 PAY LEVELS, PAY DIFFERENTIALS IN THE GOVERNMENT ............................................................ 20 4.4 CONSTITUENTS OF CTC-A COMPARISON BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE SECTOR .......... 23
4.4.1 CTC to CTG.......................................................................................................................... 28 4.4.2 Pitfalls of the CTC concept................................................................................................... 30
4.5 TOTAL REWARDS AS A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE....................................................................... 31
5 CTG-GENERAL CATEGORY........................................................................................................32
5.1 GROSS PAY OF A GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE ................................................................................ 32
6 COSTING BENEFITS-GENERAL CATEGORY .........................................................................37
6.1 COST OF PENSION ....................................................................................................................... 38 6.2 COST OF GRATUITY .................................................................................................................... 42 6.3 COST OF ENCASHMENT OF 300 DAYS LEAVE .............................................................................. 42 6.4 LEAVE TRAVEL CONCESSION..................................................................................................... 43 6.5 HOUSE BUILDING ADVANCE ....................................................................................................... 44 6.6 VEHICLE AND COMPUTER ADVANCE........................................................................................... 46 6.7 MEDICAL BENEFITS .................................................................................................................... 47 6.8 MEDICAL BENEFITS POST RETIREMENT....................................................................................... 47 6.9 CTG OF GROUP INSURANCE BENEFIT ......................................................................................... 47 6.10 BENEFITS NOT ADDED TO THE CTG ........................................................................................... 50
6.10.1 Cost of leave the employee is eligible .............................................................................. 50 6.10.2 Canteen subsidy ............................................................................................................... 50 6.10.3 Computer at home for certain levels (not in the CTG) .................................................... 50 6.10.4 Car for S29 and above (not in CTG)................................................................................ 51 6.10.5 Ex-gratia (not in CTG)..................................................................................................... 51
6.11 TABLE OF BENEFITS FOR ALL LEVELS (GENERAL EMPLOYEES)................................................... 52 6.12 COST TO GOVERNMENT TABLE BY PAY LEVELS FOR GENERAL CATEGORY GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES .............................................................................................................................................. 54
XLRI Jamshedpur
4
Estimating cost to government
6.12.1 CTG general category (special functions/geographies) .................................................. 58
7 CTG FOR RAILWAY EMPLOYEES.............................................................................................60
7.1 CONSTITUENTS OF GROSS PAY FOR RAILWAY EMPLOYEES ......................................................... 60 7.1.1 List of allowances for railway employees............................................................................. 60
8 COST OF THE BENEFITS OF RLY. EMPLOYEES ...................................................................61
8.1 RAILWAY PASSES....................................................................................................................... 63 8.2 COST OF PASSES POST RETIREMENT............................................................................................ 64 8.3 RUNNING STAFF (RAILWAYS) ..................................................................................................... 66 8.4 BUNGALOW PEON (NOT IN CTG) ............................................................................................... 67 8.5 CTG OF REPRESENTATIVE LEVELS IN THE RAILWAYS................................................................. 68
9 CTG - ARMED FORCES .................................................................................................................70
9.1 CONSTITUENTS OF GROSS PAY FOR ARMED FORCES.................................................................... 70 9.2 PAY SCALES IN THE ARMED FORCES ........................................................................................... 71
9.2.1 List of allowances for armed forces...................................................................................... 73
10 COST OF BENEFITS FOR ARMED FORCES.............................................................................76
10.1 PENSION FOR ARMED FORCES..................................................................................................... 77 10.1.1 Calculation of Pension for Sepoy..................................................................................... 78
10.2 RATION ...................................................................................................................................... 79 10.3 CANTEEN ................................................................................................................................... 79 10.4 ELECTRICITY AND WATER .......................................................................................................... 80 10.5 CHILDREN CONVEYANCE............................................................................................................ 80 10.6 LTC ........................................................................................................................................... 80 10.7 REIMBURSEMENT FOR HIRING OF FURNITURE ............................................................................ 82 10.8 LEAVE........................................................................................................................................ 82 10.9 HOUSING LOAN .......................................................................................................................... 83 10.10 SAHAYAKS (NOT IN CTG).......................................................................................................... 83 10.11 GROUP INSURANCE BENEFIT (NOT IN CTG)................................................................................ 83 10.12 THE CTG OF ARMED FORCES ..................................................................................................... 84
10.12.1 Table of benefits for armed forces ................................................................................... 84 10.12.2 Table of benefits for PBOR (army) .................................................................................. 86
11 CTG-CPMF........................................................................................................................................92
11.1 CONSTITUENTS OF GROSS PAY FOR CPMF ................................................................................. 92 11.2 RATION ...................................................................................................................................... 94
12 CTG - POSTAL EMPLOYEES .......................................................................................................96
XLRI Jamshedpur
5
Estimating cost to government
13 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY & COST OF NO-EASY-EXIT......................................................97
14 EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTIONS OF PAY ....................................................................................100
15 GOVERNMENT VS. PRIVATE SECTOR & PSUS....................................................................128
15.1 PAY MIX OF A REPRESENTATIVE PRIVATE SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS ......................................... 129 15.2 COMPARISON WITH THE PUBLIC SECTOR .................................................................................. 131
16 RECOMMENDATIONS ON PAY COMPONENTS ...................................................................134
16.1 ANALYSIS OF THE STRENGTH OF VARIOUS CTC COMPONENTS................................................. 135 16.2 EXISTENCE OF STANDARD ALLOWANCES ................................................................................. 140 16.3 PENSION................................................................................................................................... 141 16.4 ARMY CANTEENS ..................................................................................................................... 141 16.5 RAILWAY PASSES ..................................................................................................................... 142 16.6 GRATUITY ................................................................................................................................ 142 16.7 INTEREST SUBSIDIES................................................................................................................. 142 16.8 MEDICAL FACILITIES................................................................................................................ 143
17 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY..................................................................................................144
18 ANNEXURE.....................................................................................................................................145
18.1 PREMIUM RATES OF MEDICLAIM POLICIES .............................................................................. 145 18.2 AGE GROUP WISE EXPECTATION OF LIFE IN INDIA .................................................................... 146 18.3 HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION/CONSUMER EXPENDITURE............................................................ 149 18.4 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONSES TO SURVEY........................................................... 151
XLRI Jamshedpur
6
Estimating cost to government
Index of Tables Table 4-1 : Pay Scales of General category (Civilian) ..................................................... 22
Table 4-2: Constituents of CTC........................................................................................ 23
Table 4-3 : Constituents of standard Pay Package............................................................ 29
Table 5-1: Gross pay Gen. Category Special geographies by cities, grade wise.............. 35
Table 6-1: Pension contribution calculation-an illustration.............................................. 40
Table 6-2: House building advance benefit per month by grade ...................................... 45
Table 6-3: CTG on insurance by amount paid.................................................................. 48
Table 6-4: Group insurance benefit per month ................................................................. 49
Table 6-5: Table of benefits for General category employees.......................................... 52
Table 6-6: CTG (General category) at beginning of pay scale......................................... 54
Table 6-7: CTG for Doctors.............................................................................................. 55
Table 6-8: CTG general category-special geographies..................................................... 58
Table 8-1: package details Railway employees ................................................................ 62
Table 8-2: CTG of Railway passes ................................................................................... 64
Table 8-3: CTG of Railway passes post retirement .......................................................... 65
Table 8-4: Running staff pay scale ................................................................................... 66
Table 8-5: CTG of representative levels in railways in different class of cities............... 68
Table 8-6: CTG of Running staff (railways)..................................................................... 69
Table 9-1: Pay scale of officers of the three forces .......................................................... 71
Table 9-2: Pay scale of PBOR(S) ..................................................................................... 72
Table 9-3: Package of pay, benefits and allowances for armed forces............................. 74
Table 10-1: calculation of pension for sepoy.................................................................... 78
Table 10-2: CTG per month due to ration and canteen .................................................... 79
Table 10-3: Leave travel concession(s) for armed forces................................................. 82
Table 10-4: Table of benefits (armed forces officers) ...................................................... 84
Table 10-5: Table of benefits for armed forces (PBOR) .................................................. 86
Table 10-6: Gross pay for Officers ................................................................................... 87
Table 10-7: CTG of armed forces (officers) ..................................................................... 88
Table 10-8: Gross pay (PBOR)......................................................................................... 89
Table 10-9: CTG PBOR(S)............................................................................................... 89
XLRI Jamshedpur
7
Estimating cost to government
Table 11-1: List of components of Pay, allowances and Benefits for CPMF................... 93
Table 11-2: Table of Gross pay by City for CPMF for different class of cities ............... 95
Table 11-3: Table of CTG for CPMF ............................................................................... 96
Table 16-1 CTG as a multiple of Basic: General Category ............................................ 135
Table 16-2 CTG as multiple of Basic pay: Railways ..................................................... 135
Table 16-3 Armed Forces (PBOR): CTG as a multiple of basic pay ............................. 136
Table 16-4 Armed forces (Officers): CTG as a multiple of Basic pay........................... 136
Table 16-5 CPMF: CTG as a multiple of Basic Pay....................................................... 136
Index of Figures Figure 6-1: S1 CTG Pie Chart .......................................................................................... 56
Figure 6-2: S15 CTG Pie chart ......................................................................................... 57
Figure 10-1: Sepoy CTG Pie Chart................................................................................... 90
Figure 10-2: CTG Pie Chart Major/Lt. Cdr/Sqdrn. Leader .............................................. 91
XLRI Jamshedpur
8
Estimating cost to government
Introduction A recommendation on pay for any organization requires complete information of present
pay in the organization and information of pay with respect to comparative organizations.
Liberalisation of the economy post -1991 has resulted in major changes in the market.
Consequently, the compensation package of employees in the private sector in India has
witnessed a significant increase. The over-all package offered in the private sector is
worked out on a cost to company basis, quantifying most of the benefits to the
employees. The government employees frequently compare their salaries with the
compensation package in the private sector and government salaries are found to be at
variance with the package offered in the private sector. These variations stem from the
fact that the total package of benefits available to government employees is not taken into
account while making such comparisons. In order to put the matter in perspective and to
enable an appreciation of the total package of benefits to government, a study was
commissioned by the Sixth Central Pay Commission for computing in monetary terms
all the tangible and intangible benefits of government employment. The Study titled
“Estimating the Compensation Package for Government Employees and the Cost to the
Government” has been assigned to XLRI Jamshedpur (here-in-after referred to as
“XLRI”).
2 Scope and Terms of Reference of the study The aim is to study the total cost incurred by the Government for Government employees
in various grades and sectors. The study is to take into account salary, various
allowances as well as the other benefits like housing/HRA, transport facilities/ transport
allowance, telephones, free passes/ LTC, bungalow peons/ orderlies, pensionary benefits,
free rations (where ever applicable), job security and any other benefits, whether tangible
or intangible, provided by the Government to their employees.
The scope of the study is limited to the terms of the reference of the study which are detailed below:-
• To work out the cost incurred by the Government in paying the pay, allowances
and all other benefits whether monetary/in kind (tangible/intangible) to their
employees and to compute cost per employee to the Government in each of the
XLRI Jamshedpur
9
Estimating cost to government
pay scales prevailing in the Government for employees who enjoy these benefits
as well as those who do not.
• To work out monetary terms the benefits, whether in form of allowances or in
kind, available to the employees in various sectors of the Government like Armed
Forces, Police, Railways, and Posts and to study the efficacy of these benefits in
meeting their objectives.
• To determine the feasibility of evolving a compensation package that would
compensate all the benefits presently available in various pay scales/ sectors in
purely monetary terms as a more efficient way of compensating the employees.
• To study the monetary value that can be attached to security of job and the
protection under Article 311 of the Constitution available to the Government
employees. Whether this can have any impact on the emoluments payable to the
Government employees given the fact that the extant rules also preclude an easy
exit from a Government job.
The 3-Member Consultancy Team of XLRI was headed by Dr. RK Premarajan,
Professor - OB & PMIR, with Dr. EM Rao, Professor – PMIR, and Dr. L Gurunathan,
Assistant Professor – PMIR, as members. After preliminary presentations by XLRI and
discussions with the Commission, a formal agreement was signed by the parties on
January 9, 2007. XLRI started the study in right earnest, which, in brief, involved the
following steps / stages:
• Preparation and mailing of questionnaire
• Discussions with officials to understand the components of the compensation
package
• Interaction with the Commission
• Study of the compensation systems prevailing in select PSUs and Private Sector
industries/organizations
• Data Analysis and compilation
• Presentation of Draft Report
• Submission of Final Report
XLRI Jamshedpur
10
Estimating cost to government
1 AN OVERVIEW OF THE STUDY The very title of the study assigned to XLRI is self-explanatory as to its contents. Even
so, it is considered expedient to give a brief outline of the factors involved. Perhaps, for
the first time in the history of Government of India, the concept of Cost to the Company
(CTC), which is in vogue in private sector is sought to be infused into the compensation
system. This is a welcome trend. CTC or, more appropriately, in the Governmental
context, Cost to Government (CTG) refers to, and includes, the total cost incurred by the
government vis-à-vis each employee in respect of salary, allowances, other
monetary/non-monetary benefits, and perquisites of every shade and hue, whether
tangible or intangible. Simply presented, CTG represents the total out-go per employee.
Even where a particular benefit does not come into the pocket of the employee as
monetary income because of its admitted intangibility, it is nevertheless a cost to the
government in monetary terms. At a time when the general tendency of employees is to
compare their emoluments with those obtaining in other comparable concerns in the same
sector or other sectors of economy, and draw, more often than not, adverse inferences
about their own, the CTG concept helps in a large measure to clear the employee
misconceptions about the perceived external inequity. Thus, the CTG concept is
essentially geared to give the accurate information about the gross expenditure incurred
by the employer relative to each employee and thus enhance his/her satisfaction level.
It is an acknowledged fact that fixation of salary structure is the most difficult task, be it
for an employer or for an adjudicator. Revision of the existing compensation structure in
a competitive and dynamic context is even more difficult. We have encountered serious
difficulties while attempting to reconcile the highly divergent compensation and benefit
systems prevailing in different services of the Government. The range and variety of
monetary allowances and non-monetary benefits in different services as, for instance,
Armed Forces and Railways is complex. The problem is further compounded by the fact
that the total number of allowances in vogue are on the higher side of two-digit figure in
XLRI Jamshedpur
11
Estimating cost to government
so far as they are not payable to all employees across-the-board in the respective services,
but are compartmentalized in terms of grade, job title, position and place of posting. It
follows that, in such a dispensation, the task of averaging is not an easy proposition. The
perceptions of employees towards these allowances and benefits are mixed in that the
different Teams belonging to different sectors, employee’ perceptions were highlighted
rather grudgingly by the participants. Pay is a relative concept and, as already stated
above, how well an organization is paying depends to a large extent on the angle of
vision of the employees and the selective comparisons they make. The first step in
comparison exercise is the availability of concrete data in a form that enables
comparison. This study attempts to arrive at such a format. The format of pay in the
government which has a multitude allowances and benefits needs to be re-arranged and
converted to numbers in terms of monetary values to arrive at the format. This format is
popularly called cost to company. The study awarded to XLRI focuses on calculating the
cost to government for employing the government employees. As a consequence to
costing, the study takes a hard look at the Pay mix, making recommendations on their
efficacy based on employee responses and data from private sector organizations. The
ultimate objective of the study is to facilitate the Commission to arrive at a meaningful
pay related recommendations. The major focus of this study is to calculate the cost to
government for every pay-scale of the government and the various sectors. Apart from
the main objective, this study also tries to get views regarding pay from the internal
customers’ perspective viz. the employees and the comparable private organizations
XLRI Jamshedpur
12
Estimating cost to government
2 DELIVERABLES
• To compute cost to government for the compensation given to government
employees focusing on the entire direct cash component they receive at each
level/pay grade
• To compute cost to government for all the benefits and allowances given to
government employees in the various sectors at each level/pay grade (focusing on
both the tangible and intangible)
• To study the efficacy of all the benefits and allowances given to the government
employees across the various sector and suggest alternatives
• To compute cost to government of all the benefits offered to sectors like Armed
forces, Police, Railways, and Posts and study their efficacy
• To determine the feasibility of evolving a compensation package that would give
all the above mentioned benefits at a more efficient way
• To suggest the feasibility and the advantage of monetizing the benefits (either
fully or partially) and giving government employees either a cash rich
compensation or an all cash compensation package
• To assess the monetary value that can be attached to the security of and the
protection under Article 311 of the constitution of India available to the
government employees and their impact on compensation
• To estimate the cost of “no-easy-exit” rule with respect to its impact on
compensation
The study should not however be misunderstood with respect to the end it promises to
serve. The study does not make any recommendations with regard to how much pay
should be increased. The study is not intended to facilitate the pay commission with
respect to what extent pay should be increased. However, we do share data from private
XLRI Jamshedpur
13
Estimating cost to government
organizations and also make recommendations with respect to continuance of a particular
allowance or benefit.
The study also does not intend to discuss cost of employing a government servant and the
benefits accruing of employing him/her. The study discusses only the cost of
employment. The objective of this “costing” is to get a true picture of pay, so that before
going for any modification, the commission knows the complete picture of pay with all
its details.
3 METHODOLOGY The study has the following objectives:
1. Estimating gross pay for each level
2. Estimating cost to government by pricing benefits, for each level
3. Estimating the feasibility of designing a compensation package that focuses more
on the cash part and less on the benefits aspects thus also focusing on the job
security angle and cost of no easy exit
4. Defining the term “cost to company” or CTG both inclusively and exclusively.
5. Determining what components comprise gross pay by drawing comparison with
the practices prevailing in private sector; and excluding from there the special
components of pay that are applicable to a few employees.
6. Computing gross pay for different levels in the hierarchy and various sectors, i.e.,
CPMF, Railways, Armed Forces, and so forth.
7. Adding the monetized value of all the benefits received by the government
employees.
Explanation – I:
The benefits offered by the government are many. Some are included in the CTG and
some are not. The convention followed by private sector gives a broad idea as to what
should be included items in the term “benefits”. For some of the items we adopted a
judgmental approach while including and excluding certain benefits in the CTG. The
methodology used in calculating the monetized value has been explained in the Chapter
XLRI Jamshedpur
14
Estimating cost to government
on “Costing of Benefits”. The final picture emerging out of this exercise is the CTG for
different levels and grades.
Explanation – II:
The next part of the study focuses on the efficacy of the pay mix, which is best found by
obtaining the feedback from the recipients. For this purpose, we have administered a
questionnaire (appended in the appendix) for getting responses from various categories of
government employees. While we have incorporated the key findings of the survey
results at appropriate sections, the detailed analysis of the survey instruments follows in
the later sections. The other way to focus on the efficacy of the pay mix is to see if
comparative organizations continue to use some of the items and the weight they give to
those items. We have done this by focusing on a few private and public sector
organizations. The methodology is described below diagrammatically.
XLRI Jamshedpur
15
Estimating cost to government
Estimating cost to government and recommending the possibility of redesigning the package
Calculating cost of compensation starting from calculating gross pay for every government employee (with specific reference to railways, the armed forces and the CPMF)
Add the cost of benefits to the gross pay to arrive at cost to government
Design an instrument to measure the level of satisfaction with existing pay and its components
Take responses from all the four categories (general, railways, armed forces and CPMF) to get information on efficacy of the benefits
Recommend on the Feasibility of designing an alternative package
Arrive at a definition of cost to company and adapt it to the study
Compare pay with private sector and public sector organizations
XLRI Jamshedpur
16
Estimating cost to government
4 COST TO COMPANY –A PRIMER
We begin by looking at what is pay and what are the various components in pay. We then
define “Cost to Company” or, say, “Cost to Government”. However, these two terms are
being used in this report interchangeably.
4.1 Pay and its components
The term compensation signifies the remuneration paid by an employer in return for the
services rendered or result produced by the employee. It is the consideration that flows
from the employer. The consideration from the employee flows in the form of his/her
willingness to serve and produce a given result. Compensation traditionally meant cash
payment and other monetary and non-monetary benefits. The expression ‘benefits’ takes
into its fold several tangible and non-tangible facilities and benefits that an employee is
entitled to under the contract of employment and the conditions of service applicable to
him/her. For the sake of clarity and convenience, we can categorize the “total returns” an
employee receives into two categories of returns viz. “transactional” and “relational”
returns. Transactional returns are those returns – monetary and non-monetary - that the
employee is entitled to perennially. To illustrate, the basic pay, dearness allowance, house
rent allowance, city compensatory allowance, conveyance allowance, etc., and all the
intangible benefits fall under this category.
“Relational” returns refer to those which satisfy those needs that are not necessarily
monetary in nature. The returns satisfy the self-esteem and self-satisfaction needs of the
employees. These include, for instance, the pride of association with an organization, job
challenge and satisfaction, opportunity for learning and advancement, the sense of being
part of a nobler cause (in case of some organization), job security and so on. Though
organizations want to give both kinds of returns in generous proportions, there are
enough constraints forcing them to focus on a judicious mix of both. It so happens that, in
some cases, these two returns do not co-exist, though there is no inherent contradiction
XLRI Jamshedpur
17
Estimating cost to government
between them. Organisational culture, market forces, competition, need for continuous
innovation and creativity, are some of the determinants as to the co-existence or
otherwise of these two kinds of returns. The appropriate mix of the two kinds of returns is
an important pre-requisite for assessing the concept of CTC. Viewed in this perspective,
the concept of CTC per se refers exclusively to “transactional” returns. Relational
returns are a bundle of employees’ perceptions as discussed above. It therefore follows
that CTC is not an exclusive determinant of Relational returns. The fact that employees
quite often prefer to remain with an organisation for long years and work with the same
zeal and enthusiasm even when the Transactional returns are not comparable with what
their counterparts in a different sector are getting, explains the importance of Relational
returns. It is equally important to note that if the Transactional returns are too low to meet
the needs and wants of employees, a heavy dose of Relational returns would be of no
avail either to retain the employees or, when so retained, to motivate them to reach higher
levels of performance.
Pay has three components. The first is the basic pay or the pay for the position. The
general attributes of basic pay are: a scale, a range and a rate of increment. Scale of pay
for a given grade is distinguishable from that applicable to other grades. Range refers to
the minimum (starting point) and the maximum (ending point) of the basic wage. Rate of
increment is the monetary increase given in the basic pay on an annual basis (based either
on time or performance and usually both). In a close-ended scale of pay, the employee,
having reached the maximum of the scale, would not be entitled to any further annual
increment, and thus faces monetary stagnation. The second component is allowances.
Allowances constitute the additional compensation which addresses specific needs or
hardships faced by the employee in his life’s journey as, for instance, rising cost of living,
house rent, conveyance, education, etc. The third component comprises benefits, which in
contrast to allowances, are paid in kind as, for instance, medical benefits, free
refreshments, subsidized lunch, etc. These benefits are ‘intangible’ as they do not go into
the pocket of employees in cash, but all the same constitute expenditure for the employer.
Reverting to the Relational returns, a typical government employee undoubtedly feels
proud of being part of the government, which implies serving the nation. This is a
significant Relational return. Relational returns cannot be taken for granted and many
XLRI Jamshedpur
18
Estimating cost to government
organizations might not give many of the relational returns discussed above. For example
an organization that is the highest payer in the industry might be having no or little
Relational returns, i.e., work-life imbalance, focus only on task accomplishment with
little concern for people, etc. While Transactional returns can be monetized, Relational
returns cannot be or, at any rate, putting a price tag on them is very difficult in so far as
any attempt to do so turns out to be a subjective exercise susceptible to differing
perceptions. What the organization perceives as valuable need not necessarily be so from
the standpoint of the employees. Some employees may value job security very much
while others may not. This makes pricing of relational returns a near impossible task.
Nevertheless, given that monetary aspects can be easily matched by competition,
Relational returns assume importance as a critical determinant of external equity in its
comprehensive connotation. This is the area where every HR manager concentrates his
maximum efforts.
4.2 Cost to company- a working definition
“Cost to company”, a term that is freely used but not clearly defined includes all the cost
that goes into employing one employee. This includes the cost of hiring, pay, benefits,
bonuses, insurance premium and cost of training and development. CTC focuses on how
much it costs the organization to employ an employee at a given level. CTC is computed
as a cost incurred per annum. It does not indicate the extent to which the package benefits
the employee. It only tells what it costs the company, with a sharp bias in favor of
Transactional returns to the exclusion of Relational returns. Further, it takes into account
only variable cost per annum per recruit. However, the fixed costs (one-time expenses)
associated with advertisement, to and fro expenses, interview and selection expenditure,
sign bonus, etc., are not taken into account while arriving at the CTC. Similarly, the
costs incurred in running the business are also outside the scope of CTC. General costs
incurred for running the business/establishment as, for instance, the cost incurred by the
company towards water, power, maintenance of establishment, etc., are not included in
the CTC, even though the employees do use them while in office. In striking contrast, the
cost of serving refreshments, etc., is added to the CTC. From this discussion, the one
XLRI Jamshedpur
19
Estimating cost to government
underlying principle that emerges is that in order for a cost to be included in the CTC, it
should be a recurring cost and incurred by the company in its efforts to retain the
employee. Viewed thus, the pre-employment expenses are excluded.
In the following paragraphs, the components and the quanta thereof that go into CTC
have been enumerated illustratively.
At this stage, it is pertinent to raise and answer a couple of questions before proceeding
further. The first is: “whether CTC takes into account the negative aspects of the Job?”
The answer is a firm “no”. Its vision is one-sided and is concerned with what is incurred
by the employer, whereas a typical employee may not exclusively look at CTC, while
evaluating the likely returns from the job. A comprehensive assessment may enable
him/her to identify and weigh the positive and negative aspects of the job before taking a
decision to “sign-up” or not. This assessment by the prospective employee is subjective
in so far as it is propelled by his/her likes, dislikes, preferences and so forth, which may
differ from one person to other. The second question is: “why should we depend on CTC
to attract prospective employees?” Before answering this question, it should be
remembered that there was no CTC as a vital component of selection process up to the
mid-1990s. It found its way into the recruitment process in the wake of globalisation and
increasing competition. The past one decade and half witnessed the frantic efforts of
employers vying with each other to attract the best technical and managerial talent
available in the country. This competition led them to demonstrate that what they incur
per employee is more than their competitors and thus influence the prospective
candidates to opt for their organisation in preference over others. This partly answers the
question. The remaining part of the answer is furnished by the fact that a fresher
graduating from a B-school may not be able to evaluate or judge what is meant by
various benefits offered by the company within a few minutes in the course of Campus
Recruitment Programme and how the benefits affect his emoluments. Secondly, the cash
(salary) component by itself may not reveal the whole story as to what is the magnitude
of parallel benefits and facilities offered by the company. It is an exercise geared to
present a comprehensive picture of the myriad of benefits offered along with cash
components and highlighting the attractive features of the total offer. Then the third
XLRI Jamshedpur
20
Estimating cost to government
question is: “why should there be so many components in the pay packet; why not one
consolidated amount which takes into fold all the allowances?” One fundamental reason
for having components such as HRA, CCA, CA is that the amount pumped into these
components does not attract indirect costs for the employer by way of Provident Fund
(12% of basic + DA), Bonus (8.33% - 20% of Basic + DA), Gratuity ( 5% of Basic +
DA), etc. In addition, while calculating other benefits like leave encashment, etc., only
Basic and DA are taken into account. In other words, these components in the pay packet
(other than Basic Pay and Dearness Allowance) operate as a cushion for the employer to
reduce his indirect costs, while at the same time satisfying the need of the employees for
more cash in hand at the end of the month. Yet another reason is some of these
allowances and benefits get some tax concession, which goes to the advantage of the
employee. For instance, re-imbursement of conveyance expenses, medical expenses, etc.
Even HRA is eligible for tax concessions, subject to certain restrictions. The interest
component on housing loan is likewise an allowable deduction for the purpose of tax.
This explains why, in the current context, many organisations have similar components,
and many in number, in the pay packet.
4.3 Pay levels, pay differentials in the government
Organizations usually determine pay differentials in a hierarchical order. The complete
list of jobs is categorized into a few pay grades. In Government, for example, a few lakhs
of employees holding different positions have been classified under 34 Grades for the
purpose of determining the scales of pay, and so is the case with Railways. A new recruit
is fixed at the minimum of the scale applicable to him. In Government, time is used as a
proxy for learning and hence each employee progresses in the pay range with time. The
pay differential between two successive scales of pay in industry, measured at the mid-
point of the scale, shows that the pay differential between two pay scales/levels. India
ranges from 2 % at the lowest to a staggering 22% at the highest. Usually pay
differentials in India are in the 12.5-15% range. Pay scales are usually close to 20% from
the mid-point (on either side) in lower to middle levels, whereas they can reach 30-60%
of the scale in the senior management levels. The pay scales in Government satisfy these
industry practices to a large extent. The lowest grade spreads only 11% on either side of
XLRI Jamshedpur
21
Estimating cost to government
the pay scale, while the next grade is spread 15% on either side of the mid point. Most of
the grades then spread across at 20% on either side of the midpoints. Quite naturally, as
the Grade increases, the span of the scale shrinks progressively before becoming a fixed
pay at the highest level. It is recognized that the government has created positions at
some levels with a minimal increment where the position has taken precedence over pay
differential and pay range. These positions were hence ignored in the analysis.
XLRI Jamshedpur
22
Estimating cost to government
Table 4-1 : Pay Scales of General category (Civilian)
S.No. Post/ Grade Revised Scales (From 1-1-1996)
1. S – 1 2,550-55-2,660-60-3,200
2. S – 2 2,610-60-3,150-65-3,540
3. S – 2 A 2,610-60-2,910-65-3,300-70-4,000
4. S – 3 2,650-65-3,300-70-4,000
5. S – 4 2,750-70-3,800-75-4,400
6. S – 5 3,050-75-3,950-80-4,590
7. S – 6 3,200-85-4,900
8. S – 7 4,000-1,000-6,000
9. S – 8 4,500-125-7,000
10. S – 9 5,000-150-8,000
11. S – 10 5,500-175-9,000
12. S – 11 6,500-200-6,900
13. S – 12 6,500-200-10,500
14. S – 13 7,450-225-11,500
15. S – 14 7,500-250-12,000
16. S – 15 8,000-275-13,500
17. S – 16 9,000 FIXED
18. S – 17 9,000-275-9,550
19. S – 18 10,325-325-10,975
20. S – 19 10,000-325-15,200
21. S – 20 10,650-325-15,850
22. S – 21 12,000-375-16,500
23. S – 22 12,750-375-16,500
24. S – 23 12,000-375-18,000
25. S – 24 14,300-400-18,300
26. S – 25 15,100-400-18,300
27. S – 26 16,400-450-20,000
28. S – 27 16,400-450-20,900
29. S – 28 14,300-450-22,400
30. S – 29 18,400-500-22,400
31. S – 30 22,400-525-24,500
32. S – 31 22,400-600-26,000
33. S – 32 24,050-650-26,000
34. S – 33 26,000 FIXED
35. S – 34 30,000 FIXED
XLRI Jamshedpur
23
Estimating cost to government
4.4 Constituents of CTC-a comparison between government and private sector
The pay in the government sector has the following components. The table below shows the components and what they pay for Table 4-2: Constituents of CTC
Component What it pays for Mode of determining monetary value in the government
How the “Private sector” determines the value
Basic pay It is that pay associated with the position.
The pay commission arrives at pay scales for all the levels.
The various jobs have to be “evaluated” for their “relative worth” in comparison to other jobs to arrive at a hierarchy. Then using comparative organizations’ pay, the basic pay for the position is arrived at.
Annual increment & pay scale
Pay increases annually in the prescribed pay scale.
The increments in government are time based.
The private sector uses performance as a measure of deciding the pay increase. The pay increase quanta is a function of the organization’s compensation strategy, as it decides how much to increase the pay by and how important compensation is in the over all HR strategy of the organization Pay increase in the private sector also takes care of “inflation” “increase in significance of the job over the last year” “Demand and supply considerations” for the job in question.
Dearness allowance Cost of living adjustment Using a base year, and the consumer Private sector does not have this
XLRI Jamshedpur
24
Estimating cost to government
(inflation) This component is given in addition to the base pay and varies as per an approved formula.
price index, increases to the price index are compensated in equal measure. Reflected in pay as a percentage of basic pay. At the time of calculating the cost to government (1-1-2007) DA is 35% of Basic plus Dearness Pay.
component, but increases in basic pay reflects increases due to “inflation”
Dearness pay That part of dearness allowance which is merged to the basic pay. Generally when dearness allowance reaches 50% of basic pay it is merged with Basic and treated as basic pay for all calculations
A component that is in place only since 1-4-2004. A considerable benefit to the employees since most allowances (and retrial benefits) is usually calculated as a percentage of the basic pay. Technically a merging of dearness allowance as dearness pay does away with the need for a separate increase in pay by creating a self adjusting system of pay increase (though it does not take care of pay increase in comparative organizations)
House rent allowance (HRA)
A component of pay that is paid to take care of housing needs; Those government employees who get government accommodation are not eligible for HRA.
House rent allowance is calculated as a percentage of base pay depending on the classification of the city
The private sector follows a similar approach. Roughly it is 40% of basic pay, though it can go as high as 60%.
XLRI Jamshedpur
25
Estimating cost to government
City compensatory allowance (CCA)
A single rate of DA is calculated for the whole nation; CCA takes care of inter-city differences in cost of living (expensiveness).
In the government pay scale however it is a standard amount and not calculated as a percentage of basic pay.
The private sector uses City compensatory allowance to normalize pay across metros and non metros. It hence takes a huge weight at higher levels of hierarchy.
Transportation allowance
Money paid towards conveyance expenditure incurred in traveling to office and back
A standard amount based on class of city.
Conveyance allowance in Private sectors usually is a percentage of pay, and/or reimbursable with respect to fuel expense and maintenance of vehicles.
Special allowances • Special
Allowances related to functions
• Risk related allowances
• Allowances related to geography
Hardship allowance paid for posting in “difficult to live areas” (viz. Northeast and Andaman and Nicobar Islands). Usually a geography specific allowance
A unique component in government pay that takes care of transfers across the country. Hardship areas are identified and categorized and a fixed amount is given as compensation. The armed forces are in receipt of some unique hardship allowances owing to higher altitude, field areas, etc. and some function related allowances.
Reimbursement of tuition fees (of Children)
A fixed amount paid to reimburse partially the education expenditure for two children
There is hardly any education allowance except for workers which is similar to the government’s reimbursement structure. Higher levels in the hierarchy may get allowances to educate their children abroad (in lieu of other allowances viz. conveyance allowance)
XLRI Jamshedpur
26
Estimating cost to government
LTC The government reimburses money spent on travel with family. The reimbursement is pay scale dependent which increases as pay scale increases but only actuals are reimbursed
In a block of four years either two journeys to home or one journey to home and other anywhere in India.
LTC is en-cashable viz. LTC amount is part of pay; either the employee avails of the benefit and is reimbursed fully (based on pay-scale and class of travel) or the employee takes the money in cash (and pays income tax on it).
Advances Government gives loans to employees to build houses and buy vehicles, computers
The employees have to repay the loan in simple interest and hence is a cost to the government
Private sector too provides subsidy which it adds to the compensation package
Pension Deferred compensation; Government guarantees a “defined benefit” pension to employees and their family for those recruited before 1-1-2004 and all armed forces personnel irrespective of date of joining.
By deferring compensation today, one is assured of a defined benefit which is typically 50% of the pay-scale the employee is retiring in if he/she has rendered 33 years of service.
Pension is absent in the private sector except for a couple of organizations. But Private sector has EPF, where employer contributes 12% of basic+DA. Which is shown as part of CTC
Gratuity The government awards employees for associating themselves for a long time with the government; Gratuity is a statutory benefit
It is calculated as 16.5 times (assuming 33 years of service) the basic pay Plus DP+DA at the time of retiring or 3.5 lakh Rs, whichever is smaller
A component that is brought into the CTC by focusing on the annual cost incurred by the organization to give gratuity to the employee after five years.
Leave encashment Government employees can en-cash their unutilized leave subject to a maximum of 300 days
Private sector usually does not have this component
Group insurance Benefit
Employees contribute to a fund that gives benefit of savings and return.
30% of their contribution goes to an insurance fund.
Organizations contribute to group insurance on behalf of their employees.
XLRI Jamshedpur
27
Estimating cost to government
Provident fund Contribution by the employee to a fund where contribution and withdrawal are regulated
Government employees have the GPF (general provident fund scheme) where the employees have to contribute a minimum of 6% of their BP+DP+DA
All private sector organizations have a EPF scheme where the employee contributes 12% of BP+DP+DA and the employer tops it in equal amount.
Bonus and incentives Variable pay contingent on performance of either the individual, team or/and the organization
Almost all government employees receive some kind of non-productivity linked bonus. Running staff in railways have their pay tied to their performance
A very notable feature in the compensation package. Depending on the level in the organization variable pay form a minimum of 10% of CTC and go upto 50% of CTC.
Canteen subsidy/reimbursement
Reimbursement of lunch and snack expenditure
Many Government employees are in receipt of subsidized food at their offices though the exact nature of subsidy is not clear.
Organizations reimburse a fixed amount, or tie up with leading eating outlets or outsource their food courts to recognized brands; there are coupons distributed by third parties that can be used in major restaurants making management of this expenditure easy.
Washing allowance Allowance for employees who adorn special uniforms in the work place
For those employees that have to wear uniform in the work place government gives a washing allowance
Similar to the way government gives washing allowance
Medical benefit Usually given in the form of reimbursement (upto 15000 Rs per annum) and as a insurance for employees and their family
Government authorized doctors/government hospitals treat employees without taking any fee. Government employees in the general category pay a fee every month to subscribe to the CG health Scheme.
Organizations pay a medical insurance premium that covers the employees and their family (ranging from a cover of 2,00,000 Rs to 7,00,000) apart from reimbursing medical bills/prescriptions up to Rs. 15,000 per annum
Training and Development
Organizations that sponsor employees’ education sometimes add the cost to the CTC
Government also sponsors employees for training and obtaining higher qualifications. Employees can also avail leave with full pay. But the
Some organizations who sponsor education programs that lead to a certificate/diploma/degree do add it to the CTC especially if the
XLRI Jamshedpur
28
Estimating cost to government
amount is not added to CTG certificate/diploma is perceive to give an immediate gain to the employee and a long term gain to the employers
4.4.1 CTC to CTG
The understanding of the Term CTC is adapted for our study, to calculate CTG i.e. cost to government for the work performed by one
employee based on pay level. Since there is no standardization in terms of what gets added to the CTC, we have decided on a set of
components that go into the CTG. Basically they take the form of pay allowances and benefits. Pay would be basic pay+ Dearness pay.
Allowances include, dearness allowance, House rent allowance and city compensatory allowance and transport allowance. To this we add all
the benefits namely, children education assistance, LTC, HTC, pension, newspaper, telephone gratuity, Housing loan subsidy, vehicle loan
subsidy, computer loan subsidy and leave encashment. Non productivity linked bonus or productivity linked bonus is also added as a
component of CTG. This set of items constitutes the cost to government.
The costing has been done “conservatively”, i.e. though we have included gratuity, housing loan subsidy, vehicle and computer subsidy, we
have taken into account all these and more without taking into account the administrative costs that the government incurs in administering
these benefits. The human resources required to manage these schemes have not been added to the costing of these benefits. We also
understand that the government certainly is not the most efficient machinery when it comes to managing all these benefits. Thus the cost of
the benefits in the following sections is actually much more than what we have calculated.
XLRI Jamshedpur
29
Estimating cost to government
Table 4-3 : Constituents of standard Pay Package
CTC A Gross pay B Benefits C Variable pay Standard package
Basic pay Dearness pay Dearness allowance HRA CCA Transport allowance
Telephones Newspapers Children education assistance Leave travel concession/Home travel concession Pension gratuity leave encashment home loan subsidy, vehicle loan subsidy, computer loan subsidy Group insurance Medical Facilities Computer at home at certain levels
Non-productivity linked bonus or productivity linked bonus wherever applicable
Package for special functions
A+B+C as above + any of the following or some of the following Washing allowance Over time allowance Non practicing allowance (doctors) Nursing Allowance (nurses) Conveyance Allowance (higher rate for doctors) Cash Handling Allowance Split Duty Allowance
Package for special geography
A+B+C as in the first row + any/some of the following: hill compensatory allowance Island Special allowance Special Duty Allowance Special Compensatory Allowance (Remote Area, Border Area, Hard Area, Tribal Area Allowance Bad Climate Allowance)
XLRI Jamshedpur
30
Estimating cost to government
4.4.2 Pitfalls of the CTC concept
While the CTC, as already stated in the preceding paragraphs, enables an easier understanding of the pay package it has its own
disadvantages. It annualizes certain costs which, by definition should not be annualized. For example, the annual cost of contribution to a
fund that shall give gratuity to an employee five years from now, assumes that he/she will stay for five years. If he/she does not stay for the
minimum five years the employee does not stand to benefit from gratuity even though his/her annual CTC shows an amount contributed to
gratuity Variable pay, performance bonus etc. are added at its maximum level thereby distorting the actual CTC a typical employee would
receive. In the following section we calculate the CTG of each category starting from the general category.
XLRI Jamshedpur
31
Estimating cost to government
4.5 Total rewards as a government employee
In the previous sections we discussed that the total rewards a person gets by working as
an employee of an organization involves both the CTC (transactional benefits) and the
relational benefits. The relational benefits in the government are different for different
people; but roughly the list blow would be acceptable to most of the employees.
1. Employment security
2. Respect in the society
3. Balance between work and life
a. certain sections in railways and many sections of the armed forces do not
have the above mentioned benefit
4. Opportunity to be part of the larger cause of serving the country
5. Variety in job profile
The relational returns could be many more; Employment security alone is a benefit that
can be of huge value to many government employees. The total reward in being a
government employee includes both the transactional rewards (cost to government) and
the relational rewards of which a few are listed above.
XLRI Jamshedpur
32
Estimating cost to government
5 CTG-GENERAL CATEGORY In this section we calculate the CTG of the general category government employees. The
section has two sub sections, the first being calculation of gross pay and the second being
calculation of CTG where cost of benefits are added to the gross pay.
5.1 Gross pay of a government employee
The methodology section listed the gross pay of the government employee. Accordingly,
the gross pay is arrived at adding, basic pay, dearness pay, dearness allowance; house
rent allowance, city compensatory allowance and transport allowance. The gross pay for
each level is given below. Please note that, the calculation is at the beginning of each pay
scale. Usually pay for each pay scale is calculated at the mid point of the pay scale. But
since the government pay scales have varying ranges across the various sectors the
beginning of the pay scale makes more sense. Table 5-1: Gross pay general category at beginning of scale for different class of cities, grade wise
A1 class of city
A class city B1 class city
B class city
C class city
Unclassified City
S1 6,536 5,933 5,878 5,848 5,526 5,430
S2 6,760 6,123 6,048 6,013 5,654 5,556
S3 6,859 6,213 6,138 6,103 5,739 5,640
S4 7,106 6,438 6,363 6,328 5,953 5,850
S5 7,849 7,113 7,038 7,003 6,594 6,480
S6 8,320 7,540 7,455 7,395 6,915 6,795
S7 10,300 9,340 9,255 9,195 8,625 8,475
S8 11,538 10,465 10,380 10,320 9,694 9,525
S9 12,775 11,590 11,505 11,445 10,763 10,575
S10 14,013 12,715 12,630 12,570 11,831 11,625
S11 16,788 15,265 15,005 14,945 14,094 13,850
S12 16,788 15,265 15,005 14,945 14,094 13,850
S13 19,139 17,403 17,143 17,083 16,124 15,845
S14 19,263 17,515 17,255 17,195 16,231 15,950
S15 20,900 19,040 18,580 18,520 17,500 17,200
S16 23,375 21,290 20,830 20,770 19,638 19,300
XLRI Jamshedpur
33
Estimating cost to government
S17 23,375 21,290 20,830 20,770 19,638 19,300
S18 26,654 24,271 23,811 23,751 22,470 22,083
S19 25,850 23,540 23,080 23,020 21,775 21,400
S20 27,459 25,003 24,543 24,483 23,164 22,765
S21 30,800 28,040 27,580 27,520 26,050 25,600
S22 32,656 29,728 29,268 29,208 27,653 27,175
S23 30,800 28,040 27,580 27,520 26,050 25,600
S24 36,493 33,215 32,755 32,695 30,966 30,430
S25 38,473 35,015 34,555 34,495 32,676 32,110
S26 41,690 37,940 37,480 37,420 35,455 34,840
S27 41,690 37,940 37,480 37,420 35,455 34,840
S28 36,493 33,215 32,755 32,695 30,966 30,430
S29 46,640 42,440 41,980 41,920 39,730 39,040
S30 56,540 51,440 50,980 50,920 48,280 47,440
S31 56,540 51,440 50,980 50,920 48,280 47,440
S32 60,624 55,153 54,693 54,633 51,807 50,905
S33 65,450 59,540 59,080 59,020 55,975 55,000
S34 75,350 68,540 68,080 68,020 64,525 63,400
XLRI Jamshedpur
34
Estimating cost to government
As stated in the previous section, the gross pay calculation does not include the following
allowances:
Allowances that are given to employees because of the specialties of the occupation viz.
washing allowance for uniform adorning employees, over time allowance for drivers, etc.
are not added to the CTG as the objective is to give a “standard” picture. The allowances
nevertheless will be added to those employees who will be eligible for them.
Similarly geography specific allowances viz. special compensatory remote locality
allowance, Island special duty allowance, etc. given to those employees for neutralizing
the extra cost of living and hardship borne by trying to adapt to special geographies
during their tenure is not added in the gross pay calculation. The cost to government for
special categories (geographically and functionally) is shown below:-
XLRI Jamshedpur
35
Estimating cost to government
Table 5-1: Gross pay Gen. Category Special geographies by cities, grade wise
Post/Grade Gross pay in NE in C and part C
Gross pay in NE in PartB
Gross pay in Port Blair
Gross pay in CAR Nicobar
S1 6,304 6,404 6,756 6,982
S2 6,443 6,543 6,902 7,133
S3 6,536 6,636 6,999 7,233
S4 6,769 6,869 7,243 7,484
S5 7,616 7,716 8,159 8,438
S6 7,965 8,065 8,525 8,815
S7 9,975 10,175 10,805 11,125
S8 11,138 11,338 12,024 12,381
S9 12,300 12,500 13,243 13,638
S10 13,463 13,663 14,461 14,894
S11 16,063 16,363 17,274 17,831
S12 16,063 16,363 17,274 17,831
S13 18,271 18,571 19,589 20,218
S14 18,388 18,688 19,711 20,344
S15 19,750 20,050 21,130 21,800
S16 22,075 22,375 23,568 24,313
S17 22,075 22,375 23,568 24,313
S18 25,156 25,456 26,797 27,642
S19 24,400 24,700 26,005 26,825
S20 25,911 26,211 27,589 28,458
S21 29,050 29,350 30,880 31,850
S22 30,794 31,094 32,708 33,734
S23 29,050 29,350 30,880 31,850
S24 34,398 34,698 36,486 37,629
S25 36,258 36,558 38,436 39,639
S26 39,280 39,580 41,605 42,905
S27 39,280 39,580 41,605 42,905
S28 34,398 34,698 36,486 37,629
S29 43,930 44,230 46,480 47,930
S30 53,230 53,530 56,230 57,980
S31 53,230 53,530 56,230 57,980
S32 57,066 57,366 60,252 62,126
S33 61,600 61,900 65,005 67,025
XLRI Jamshedpur
36
Estimating cost to government
S34 70,900 71,200 74,755 77,075
XLRI Jamshedpur
37
Estimating cost to government
6 COSTING BENEFITS-GENERAL CATEGORY
Costing benefits normally needs some assumptions as it is not very easy to attribute
monetary value to benefits without making some assumptions. One might question the
inclusion of pension in benefits. Well, pension simply put is “deferred compensation”. It
is a benefit because, the government guarantees some form of “income security” to the
employee and his/her family. This benefit gets extended to his family after his/her death.
Pricing benefits sometimes is fairly easy, sometimes very difficult and sometimes
bordering on impossibility (viz. pricing job security). In the following sections we have
listed the items that have been included in the CTC, by making suitable assumptions.
The list of benefits as already stated in the previous section includes:
• Children education assistance
• Telephones
• Newspapers
• Leave travel concession
• Home travel concession
• Pension
• gratuity
• leave encashment
• home loan subsidy
• vehicle loan subsidy
• computer loan subsidy
• group insurance
• medical facilities
Children education assistance is calculated assuming one to two children at the rate of Rs
40 per child per month except at the higher levels where this has not been provided for.
XLRI Jamshedpur
38
Estimating cost to government
Non productivity linked bonus is technically a variable component of pay. It has been
added to the CTG for S1 to S11 at Rs 2419 per annum and is added to the benefits,
though technically it is not a benefit.
6.1 Cost of pension
Government employees who joined the government before 1-1-2004 get a defined
pension amount. The amount of pension payable is 50% of the basic pay. Moreover it is
inflation indexed and also paid after the employee’s demise to his/her family @ 30% of
the basic pay. To calculate the monthly cost of pension, one has to calculate how much
the government should contribute to a pension fund, which after 33 years gives a corpus
amount that can pay for the pension assuming 20 years post retired life. 20 years was
assumed based on age group wise expectation of life in India at 60 years. (Annexure
18.2). We also assumed 10 years of family pension i.e. we have assumed that after 20
years the government will give family pension to the employee for the next 10 years.
In estimating the corpus that needs to be built up by the end of the career span , for
servicing the pension outflow in the future , the methodology adopted is as follows:
basic salary at entry points have been considered and a career span of 33 years assumed.
We have assumed that the pay increases by 2% every year and to that have added a DA
of 6% per annum. Roughly every 10 years, once a Pay Commission makes
recommendation, the DA gets merged into the pay and generally 20% of the previous
basic pay is added to form a new pay. On an average, a government employee sees two
promotions and two Pay Commissions. Using the above calculations we arrive at the pay
33 years from now. The employee gets 50% of Pay as pension and this pension increases
at 6% of the pension per annum. This pension is also subject to revision with every Pay
Commission. 40 % of the pension can be commuted by the employee at the time of
retirement. This value is calculated based on the extant commutation table. The
remaining 60% of pension is paid to the employee along with dearness relief which is
calculated on 100% of monthly pension. The amount commuted is restored after a period
of 15 years. We have calculated the net present value discounted at 8 % per annum for
monthly pension paid over 20 years and for 10 years of family pension. The lumpsum
commutation amount payable on retirement along with the NPV figure is the amount the
XLRI Jamshedpur
39
Estimating cost to government
government has to save to provide for pension. The amount the government has to set
aside to accumulate the net present value calculated above, from the day the employee
joins for the next 33 years gives us the monthly value of pension. The percentage of
Basic pay to be set aside to generate the corpus was arrived at by using goal-seek i.e., by
varying the percentage of basic pay. We arrived at approximately 30% of Basic pay.
Our calculations using the assumptions as described above shows that pay increases
roughly by 7.6% per annum (compounded). Further, we have assumed only 2
promotions. In the long term, say 33 years, pay will definitely increase more than 7.6%
and many government employees particularly those belonging to Group A Services may
see 4 to 6 promotions. Even if 4 to 6 promotions in a career of 33 years are assumed for
the purpose of this calculation, the amount of contribution would range from 33 to 34
percent of basic pay. However, since the difference is not very significant, for the
purpose of the study, two promotions have been used as the general average. As such, the
estimates made are conservative, particularly in respect of the Group A Services.
We have shown the calculations for level S1 where the basic pay is Rs. 2550. Using goal-
seek we arrive at 29.39% of the minimum of the basic pay as the amount of contribution
per month that should be contributed in a pension fund. In the example shown in the table
below pay is increased by 20% (after merging the DA) every 10 years due to the “Pay
commission effect”. It is also assumed that the employee sees a minimum of 2
promotions. The calculation is conservative as many government employees will see
more than 2 promotions.
The table below shows the contribution per month for an employee getting Rs. 2550 as
basic pay per month.
XLRI Jamshedpur
40
Estimating cost to government
Table 6-1: Pension contribution calculation-an illustration
Per month contribution 29.39%
Year Basic DA Pay % of Basic per year
contribution
1 2,550.00 0 2,550.00 749.34 8,992.13
2 2,601.00 156.06 2,757.06 764.33 9,171.97
3 2,652.00 318.3624 2,970.36 779.32 9,351.82
4 2,703.00 486.9072 3,189.91 794.30 9,531.66
5 2,754.00 661.6944 3,415.69 809.29 9,711.50
6 2,805.00 842.724 3,647.72 824.28 9,891.34
7 2,856.00 1029.996 3,886.00 839.27 10,071.19
8 2,907.00 1223.51 4,130.51 854.25 10,251.03
9 2,958.00 1423.267 4,381.27 869.24 10,430.87
10 3,009.00 1629.266 4,638.27 884.23 10,610.71
Pay commission 1 11 5,240.07 0 5,240.07 1,539.85 18,478.18
12 5,344.87 320.69 5,665.56 1,570.65 18,847.74
First promotion 13 5,663.46 654.21 6,317.68 1,664.27 19,971.22
14 5,776.73 1,039.81 6,816.54 1,697.55 20,370.64
15 5,890.00 1,414.14 7,304.15 1,730.84 20,770.07
16 6,003.27 1,802.34 7,805.61 1,764.12 21,169.49
17 6,116.54 2,204.40 8,320.94 1,797.41 21,568.92
18 6,229.81 2,620.33 8,850.14 1,830.69 21,968.34
19 6,343.08 3,050.12 9,393.19 1,863.98 22,367.76
20 6,456.35 3,493.77 9,950.12 1,897.27 22,767.19
Pay commission 2 21 11,241.39 0 11,241.39 3,303.40 39,640.79
22 11,466.21 687.97 12,154.19 3,369.47 40,433.61
23 11,691.04 1,403.46 13,094.51 3,435.54 41,226.42
24 11,915.87 2,146.48 14,062.35 3,501.60 42,019.24
Second promotion 25 12,617.33 2,917.00 15,534.34 3,707.74 44,492.82
26 12,855.65 3,860.90 16,716.55 3,777.77 45,333.21
27 13,093.97 4,720.59 17,814.56 3,847.80 46,173.59
28 13,332.28 5,609.46 18,941.74 3,917.83 47,013.98
29 13,570.60 6,527.49 20,098.09 3,987.86 47,854.36
30 13,808.92 7,474.69 21,283.61 4,057.90 48,694.75
Pay commission 31 24,045.39 0.00 24,045.39 7,065.99 84,791.88
XLRI Jamshedpur
41
Estimating cost to government
3
32 24,526.30 1,471.58 25,997.88 7,207.31 86,487.72
33 25,007.21 3,002.02 28,009.23 7,348.63 88,183.56
Amount at time of retirement 2,709,356.45
2,709,356.45
XLRI Jamshedpur
42
Estimating cost to government
Explanation: How did we arrive at the amount to be saved viz. 2,709,356.45:-
The pay in the 33rd year (only the basic) is 25,007.21. 50% of this amount is 12,503.60.
40% of the amount of pension can be commuted at a multiplication factor which is 9.81
for those retiring at the age of 60. The commuted amount is restored after the 15th year.
The pension increases in amount in terms of dearness allowance( called dearness relief
and paid on the full amount of pension before commutation) until the next Pay
Commission merges the DA with the pension. This pension is assumed to end at the 20th
year after which the family pension is assumed to start and continue for 10 years. The
amount of pension and family pension (excluding the amount of lumpsum commutation
paid on retirement) are discounted at 8%. This, along with the commuted amount is
indicative of the amount to be notionally saved by the time the employee retires.
6.2 Cost of gratuity
Employees get 16.5 times their pay or Rs 3, 50,000. In the earlier section we discovered
that the pay roughly increases by 7.6% per year. Hence, we assumed a growth of
approximately 8% in the pay. On a conservative basis, we also assumed the maximum
ceiling of gratuity as Rs 8,00,000 for the purpose of costing, keeping in view a length of
service of 33 years. The monthly contribution to a fund that grows at 8% per annum
eventually reaching a maximum of Rs 8 lakh is the cost of gratuity in monthly terms.
6.3 Cost of Encashment of 300 days leave
The calculation is very similar to that of gratuity. Pay increases by 8 percent over 33
years. An employee is eligible to en-cash up to 300 days basic + DA of the last drawn
pay. The very fact that the employee is able to en-cash the amount makes it necessary for
the government to save for the reimbursement. The government has to save a small
amount every month which grows over 33 years at 8% per annum. Given that employees
cannot normally enter service after S15, the assumption that government has 33 years to
save is hypothetical at levels higher than S15.. Hence the cost to government shown in
the package is again conservative.
XLRI Jamshedpur
43
Estimating cost to government
6.4 Leave Travel Concession
Employees of the government are reimbursed the travel expenses they incur towards
going home once in two years. This is called home travel concession. In a block of four
years, instead of one home travel concession, the employee can travel to any part of the
country along with their family. The reimbursement amount increases by pay level as the
class of travel (by rail) increases by pay level. All-India LTC and HTC are benefits as the
government employee cannot en-cash it. Costing for LTC/HTC was done using the
maximum entitlement of the employee and not the actual utilization of LTC/HTC in the
past few years. The assumption of maximum entitlement in costing LTC has been made
as the employee has the option of utilizing his full entitlement, should he wish to do so.
Hence, we focused on the potential amount the government was willing to reimburse for
every employee.
However, we did not want to assume that every government employee will travel the
entire length and breadth of the country every four years. We have assumed 1000
kilometers as LTC distance traveled by a family. So, for an employee eligible to travel
only by sleeper class, he or she when traveling 1000 kms will cost the government Rs
674 (337 x 2) per person. We have assumed a family of 3 for S1,of 4 for S2 to S29 ;of 3
for S30 and S31 and a family of 2 for S32 to S34. A few levels are eligible to travel by
air; the costing for these levels is assumed to be the price of traveling from Delhi to
Nagpur and return. Instead of the full economy fare, we have taken the discounted fares
and cost it at Rs 8000 per trip. If the basic pay is above Rs. 4100, then he is eligible to
travel by third A/C fare which would cost. Rs. 975 per person per trip. If the basic pay is
above Rs 8000, then the employee is eligible to travel by A/C II tier, which would cost
about Rs. 1366 per trip. The HTC is cost at 50% of the LTC. i.e. we have assumed that
when traveling under HTC, the employee travels only 500 Km (one way).
XLRI Jamshedpur
44
Estimating cost to government
6.5 House building advance
The house building advance that the employees get is 34 times their basic pay Plus DP or
Rs 7,50,000 whichever is lower. The principal is repaid first and then the simple interest
is recovered. House building advance is nowadays shown in the CTC of any organization
whenever the organization gives them an interest subsidy. The rationale that every
employee would most likely avail of this benefit brings it to the CTC table. For the
purpose of calculating the exact benefit the employees get, we have calculated the actual
EMI the employee pays per month and the EMI (Equated monthly installment) the
employee would have paid had he taken the advance from a bank. Since government
employees get their loan at simple interest, the difference between a similar
advance/Credit given by a public sector bank gives the benefit. The benefit is calculated
for an interest rate of 9.5 %. The equivalent EMI from a bank in India is priced at 1000
Rs for every Rs. 100000 loan with duration of 20 years. The employee when taking a
government loan repays the principal in 180 monthly installments and interest in 60
installments. In order to make the two loans comparable the total interest paid is
calculated and added to the principal amount and divided by 240 (maximum no. of
installments allowed for repayment)
XLRI Jamshedpur
45
Estimating cost to government
Table 6-2: House building advance benefit per month by grade
Post/Grade House building advance Benefit
S1 130,050 411
S2 133,110 421
S3 135,150 427
S4 140,250 444
S5 155,550 492
S6 163,200 516
S7 204,000 645
S8 229,500 726
S9 255,000 806
S10 280,500 887
S11 331,500 1,048
S12 331,500 1,048
S13 379,950 1,202
S14 382,500 1,210
S15 408,000 1,162
S16 459,000 1,307
S17 459,000 1,307
S18 526,575 1,500
S19 510,000 1,453
S20 543,150 1,547
S21 612,000 1,743
S22 650,250 1,852
S23 612,000 1,743
S24 729,300 2,077
S25 750,000 2,136
S26 750,000 2,136
S27 750,000 2,136
S28 729,300 2,077
S29 750,000 2,136
S30 750,000 2,136
S31 750,000 2,136
S32 750,000 2,136
S33 750,000 2,136
S34 750,000 2,136
XLRI Jamshedpur
46
Estimating cost to government
6.6 Vehicle and computer advance
The vehicle advance and computer advance are also a benefit to government employees
to the extent of the difference in the cost of the loan. The government employee pays
back the vehicle and computer advance that he/she avails from the government on the
basis of simple interest. In the market, the interest payable is compounded. Hence, the
difference in interest payment on account of simple and compound interest is shown in
the CTG as the benefit..
For buying a two wheeler, the maximum amount of loan given by the government is Rs
30,000 or 4 times pay plus DP, whichever is lower? For buying a four wheeler, the
maximum amount is 180000 or 8 times the basic Plus DP. For comparison purposes, we
have assumed the interest rate of 11.5 % for a four wheeler loan and duration of 7 years
(as is the wont in the banks). For two wheelers we have assumed that the banks give the
loan at 12.5% interest rate (as against the 8% simple interest rate given by government);
but the loan is paid in 48 installments (as against the 70 allowed in the government). We
have used the assumptions used for calculating two wheeler advance subsidy for
calculating computer advance subsidy. For an amount of Rs. 30,000 the subsidy is about
Rs. 80 per month.
XLRI Jamshedpur
47
Estimating cost to government
6.7 Medical benefits
For medical benefits, we used the cost of insurance premium assuming an annual
insurance premium of Rs. 2951 based on data from www.Indiastat.com. The data gives
insurance premium rates for different ages. We have used ages 36-45 and a sum assured
of Rs. 200000. The source is acknowledged in the appendix-D. Technically the cost to
government for medical insurance is understated since the benefit to the employee is
unlimited. At level S1, the family size is assumed to be 3,from S2 to S29 the family size
is taken as 4; at level S30 and S31, the family size is assumed to be 3 and at level S32 and
above family size assumed is 2. We have deducted from this the employee’s contribution
to the Central Government Health Scheme.
6.8 Medical benefits post retirement
The government employees are in receipt of medical benefits post retirement. We have
tried costing this in a manner similar to gratuity/pension in that we have focused on how
much the government would have to save every month in order to pay insurance premium
for government employees post retirement. We have assumed that insurance premium
rates will grow along with inflation (at 5%). The insurance premium for age 60 and above
is around Rs. 8000. per annum. This amount grows at 5% per annum. The savings that
the government makes per month (hypothetically) grows at 8% per annum. The insurance
premium is assumed to be paid for a period of 20 years for both husband and wife. Hence
the government has to save 538 rupees every month for 33 years.
6.9 CTG of Group insurance benefit
Employees of the government (general category) contribute to a fund every month, 30%
of which goes to an insurance fund and the rest goes to a savings fund which gives 8%
return. The insurance fund gives insurance benefits in case of loss of life. But the benefits
XLRI Jamshedpur
48
Estimating cost to government
are much more than that would be possible had the employee contributed to an insurance
company in the market. i.e. the employee contributes less than what he/she should to get
the same insurance benefit. Given that the benefit is defined, the difference between the
insurance premium that should be paid and the premium the employee actually
contributes constitutes the benefit that the employee receives and also denotes the cost
the government incurs.
The following assumptions were made in finding the cost of the insurance benefit in the
market.
Assuming the age of the individual is 25 years, if he takes an insurance policy for a
period of 33 years, then he shall have to pay Rs. 25 (approx.) for every Rs. 1000 sum
assured per annum. This gives us the market price for insurance the employee has to pay.
Depending on the insurance amount assured in the even of death, the total cost can be
calculated. We used the LIC website for calculating the exact premium. An employee
who contributes Rs 15 every month to the group insurance scheme contributes 30% of
that or Rs 5 per month to a insurance fund for which the market premium is Rs 32 per
month. Similarly an employee who contributes Rs 60 every month contributes Rs 20 to
an insurance fund that promises a sum assured of Rs. 60000 for which the premium per
month works out to be Rs 129 per month. Finally for a sum assured of Rs. 120000, the
employee would be paying Rs. 249 per month while he/she contributes only Rs 36. The
actual cost to government per month is displayed below for every pay level. Table 6-3: CTG on insurance by amount paid
Amount paid Insurance component Sum assured Market premium rate CTG
15 4.5 15000 32 27.5
30 9 30000 60 51
60 18 60000 129 111 120 36 120000 249 213
XLRI Jamshedpur
49
Estimating cost to government
Table 6-4: Group insurance benefit per month
Grade Pay scale at the minimum of scale Group insurance Benefit
S1 2,550.00 27.50 S2 2,610.00 27.50 S3 2,650.00 27.50 S4 2,750.00 51.00 S5 3,050.00 51.00 S6 3,200.00 51.00 S7 4,000.00 51.00 S8 4,500.00 51.00 S9 5,000.00 51.00 S10 5,500.00 111.00 S11 6,500.00 111.00 S12 6,500.00 111.00 S13 7,450.00 111.00 S14 7,500.00 111.00 S15 8,000.00 213.00 S16 9,000.00 213.00 S17 9,000.00 213.00 S18 10,325.00 213.00 S19 10,000.00 213.00 S20 10,650.00 213.00 S21 12,000.00 213.00 S22 12,750.00 213.00 S23 12,000.00 213.00 S24 14,300.00 213.00 S25 15,100.00 213.00 S26 16,400.00 213.00 S27 16,400.00 213.00 S28 14,300.00 213.00 S29 18,400.00 213.00 S30 22,400.00 213.00 S31 22,400.00 213.00 S32 24,050.00 213.00 S33 26,000.00 213.00 S34 30,000.00 213.00
XLRI Jamshedpur
50
Estimating cost to government
6.10 Benefits not added to the CTG
There are a few benefits that we have not added to the CTG. The components and the
reasons for not adding them are given below.
6.10.1 Cost of leave the employee is eligible
The per day salary for the no. of leave that the government employees is eligible for is
calculated on a per month basis. But this is not added to the CTC, as the salary given to
an employee is not for the working days alone but rather for the whole month. The reason
being that salary is paid for an expected output over a larger span of time (one month)
rather than by the hour.
6.10.2 Canteen subsidy
Government employees at a few places are in receipt of canteen facilities for tea, snacks
and even lunch. The costs at which these are available are lesser than the market cost.
However these are not available for everyone and we do not have a data regarding the
cost and the extent of subsidy. Hence we have not added this item into the package.
6.10.3 Computer at home for certain levels (not in the CTG)
Joint Secretaries and equivalent and above, are given a computer at residence. The cost of
this computer is however not added to the CTG.
XLRI Jamshedpur
51
Estimating cost to government
6.10.4 Car for S29 and above (not in CTG)
The cost to government in employing a chauffeur for the car is a benefit. Since it is
strictly for official use officially we cannot add it as a benefit. Hence car for given as a
privilege is not added to CTG, since transport allowance amount of Rs. 800 is already
added.
6.10.5 Ex-gratia (not in CTG)
If the government employee is fatally wounded when in duty the government pays an ex-
gratia amount of Rs. 7, 50,000. This amount is for the family of the employee. This
amount is not added to the CTG.
XLRI Jamshedpur
52
Estimating cost to government
6.11 Table of benefits for all levels (General employees)
The table below shows the numbers that we have arrived at based on the discussion shown in the previous sections. The benefits by pay
level are shown below. Table 6-5: Table of benefits for General category employees
Post / Grade
LTA HTA Tele phones
News papers
Pension Gratuity Leave encashtt
cost of medical net Deductions
Medical insurance post retirement
motor vehicle subsidy
computer advance subsidy
interest subsidy/ month on HBA
Group Insurance
Sum of all benefits
S1 42 21 765 274 167 698 538 411 28 2,984
S2 56 28 783 280 171 944 538 421 28 3,328
S3 56 28 795 285 174 944 538 427 28 3,354
S4 56 28 825 295 180 944 538 444 51 3,440
S5 56 28 915 328 200 944 538 492 51 3,632
S6 56 28 960 344 210 914 538 516 51 3,727
S7 163 82 1,200 411 262 914 538 80 80 645 51 4,215
S8 163 82 1,350 411 295 914 538 80 80 726 51 4,609
S9 163 82 1,500 411 328 914 538 80 80 806 51 5,032
S10 163 82 1,650 411 361 884 538 80 80 887 111 5,356
S11 163 82 1,950 411 426 884 538 80 80 1,048 111 5,883
S12 228 114 80 1,950 411 426 884 538 80 80 1,048 111 5,963
S13 228 114 80 2,235 411 488 884 538 80 80 1,202 111 6,433
S14 228 114 80 2,250 411 492 884 538 80 80 1,210 111 6,459
S15 228 114 80 2,400 411 524 834 538 80 80 1,162 213 6,794
XLRI Jamshedpur
53
Estimating cost to government
Post / Grade
LTA HTA Tele phones
News papers
Pension Gratuity Leave encashtt
cost of medical net Deductions
Medical insurance post retirement
motor vehicle subsidy
computer advance subsidy
interest subsidy/ month on HBA
Group Insurance
Sum of all benefits
S16 228 114 80 2,700 411 590 884 538 80 80 1,307 213 7,305
S17 228 114 80 2,700 411 590 884 538 80 80 1,307 213 7,305
S18 228 114 80 3,098 411 677 834 538 80 126 1,500 213 7,932
S19 228 114 80 3,000 411 656 834 538 80 126 1,453 213 7,816
S20 228 114 80 3,195 411 698 834 538 762 126 1,547 213 8,825
S21 228 114 1,500 80 3,600 411 787 834 538 762 126 1,743 213 11,015
S22 228 114 1,500 80 3,825 411 836 834 538 762 126 1,852 213 11,398
S23 228 114 1,500 80 3,600 411 787 834 538 762 126 1,743 213 11,015
S24 228 114 1,500 80 4,290 411 937 834 538 762 126 2,077 213 12,190
S25 390 195 1,500 80 4,530 411 990 834 538 762 126 2,136 213 12,541
S26 390 195 1,500 80 4,920 411 1,075 834 538 762 126 2,136 213 13,259
S27 390 195 1,500 80 4,920 411 1,075 834 538 762 126 2,136 213 13,259
S28 390 195 1,500 80 4,290 411 937 834 538 762 126 2,077 213 12,190
S29 1,333 667 1,800 160 5,520 411 1,206 834 538 762 126 2,136 213 15,745
S30 1,000 500 1,800 240 6,720 411 1,468 588 538 762 126 2,136 213 16,542
S31 1,000 500 1,800 240 6,720 411 1,468 588 538 762 126 2,136 213 16,502
S32 1,000 500 1,800 240 7,215 411 1,577 517 538 762 126 2,136 213 17,034
S33 667 334 2,800 240 7,800 411 1,704 517 538 762 126 2,136 213 18,247
S34 667 334 2,800 240 9,000 411 1,967 517 538 762 126 2,136 213 19,709
XLRI Jamshedpur
54
Estimating cost to government
6.12 Cost to government table by pay levels for general category government employees
This table displays CTG for all levels of government employees in different classes of
cities. Table 6-6: CTG (General category) at beginning of pay scale
Grade CTG A1 city CTG A city CTG B1 CTG B city CTG C city Unclassified
city
S1 9,722 9,118 9,063 9,033 8,711 8,615
S2 10,215 9,597 9,542 9,512 9,184 9,086
S3 10,340 9,713 9,658 9,628 9,295 9,196
S4 10,673 10,025 9,970 9,940 9,595 9,492
S5 11,682 10,946 10,871 10,836 10,427 10,313
S6 12,148 11,378 11,303 11,268 10,843 10,723
S7 14,717 13,757 13,672 13,612 13,042 12,892
S8 16,348 15,276 15,191 15,131 14,504 14,336
S9 18,009 16,824 16,739 16,679 15,996 15,809
S10 19,570 18,272 18,187 18,127 17,389 17,182
S11 22,872 21,349 21,089 21,029 20,178 19,934
S12 22,750 21,228 20,968 20,908 20,056 19,813
S13 25,572 23,836 23,576 23,516 22,557 22,278
S14 25,722 23,974 23,714 23,654 22,691 22,409
S15 27,694 25,834 25,374 25,314 24,294 23,994
S16 30,680 28,595 28,135 28,075 26,942 26,605
S17 30,680 28,595 28,135 28,075 26,942 26,605
S18 34,586 32,203 31,743 31,683 30,401 30,014
S19 33,666 31,356 30,896 30,836 29,591 29,216
S20 36,284 33,828 33,368 33,308 31,990 31,590
S21 41,815 39,055 38,595 38,535 37,065 36,615
S22 44,054 41,126 40,666 40,606 39,051 38,573
S23 41,815 39,055 38,595 38,535 37,065 36,615
S24 48,682 45,405 44,945 44,885 43,156 42,620
S25 51,014 47,556 47,096 47,036 45,217 44,651
S26 54,949 51,199 50,739 50,679 48,714 48,099
S27 54,949 51,199 50,739 50,679 48,714 48,099
S28 48,682 45,405 44,945 44,885 43,156 42,620
XLRI Jamshedpur
55
Estimating cost to government
For Doctors, 25% of Basic pay + Dearness pay is added as a non practicing allowance.
Since this is treated as basic pay for all purposes, their HRA, CCA and even pension will
be more. We also have added Rs.180 across all levels as a representative conveyance
allowance given to doctors. (Doctors are only in s15, s19, s 21, s24, s29, s30 and s33). Table 6-7: CTG for Doctors
Gross pay A1 city
Gross pay A CTGA1 CTGA
S15 26030 23720 7215 33245
S19 32218 29345 9190 41408
S21 38405 34970 11603 50008
S24 45521 41439 12423 57943
S29 58205 52970 16084 74289
S30 70580 64220 16946 87526
S33 74293 67595 17715 92008
S29 62,385 58,185 57,725 57,665 55,475 54,785
S30 73,082 67,982 67,522 67,462 64,822 63,982
S31 73,042 67,942 67,482 67,422 64,782 63,942
S32 77,658 72,186 71,726 71,666 68,841 67,939
S33 83,697 77,787 77,327 77,267 74,222 73,247
S34 95,059 88,249 87,789 87,729 84,234 83,109
XLRI Jamshedpur
56
Estimating cost to government
Figure 6-1: S1 CTG Pie Chart
S1 CTG breakup
BP+DP+DA 54%
Ginsurance Benefit0%
TA1%
Medical post retirment6%
leave encash2%
LTC0%
Medical7%
HRA A1 13%
CCA A11%Reimbursement of
Tution fee1%
LTC0%
Housing interest subsidy per month
4%Gratuity
3%
Pension8%
BP+DP+DA
HRA A1
CCA A1
TA
Reimbursement of Tution fee
LTC
LTC
Pension
Gratuity
leave encash
Medical
Medical post ret irment
Housing interest subsidy permonthGinsurance Benefit
The above diagrammatic representation of the pay of an employee at S1 level shows that
medical benefits are almost equally pronounced at this level as pension benefits. Since
the medical benefits are the same across levels, the weight of medical benefits will come
down as one goes up the level. As a consequence pension and gratuity will be more
pronounced. Interestingly HTA, LTA have almost nil weights though benefits due to
housing loan have about 4% weight. At 54% the basic pay has more weights than what
the private sectors have. But HRA is moderately pronounced at 13%.
XLRI Jamshedpur
57
Estimating cost to government
As we go up the level we see that the weight of benefits as a percentage of the CTC is coming down. Some of the factors contributing to the weights could be the way we have cost some of the benefits like medical facilities as the same across all the levels. Figure 6-2: S15 CTG Pie chart
S15 CTG break up
BP+DP+DA51%
HRA23%
LTA1%
HTA0%
leave encash1%
Medical insurance post retirement
2%
computer advance subsidy0%
New spapers0%
Reimb of T. Fee0%
Transport allow ance3%
interest subsidy per month on HBA
7%
Ginsurance Benefit1%
CCA1%
Pension8%
Gratuity1%
motor vehicle subsidy0%
Medical3%
BP+DP+DA
HRA
CCA
Transport allow ance
Reimb of T. Fee
LTA
HTA
New spapers
Pension
Gratuity
leave encash
Medical
Medical insurance post retirement
motor vehicle subsidy
computer advance subsidy
interest subsidy per month on HBA
Ginsurance Benefit
At S15 more components enter, and weight of Medical facilities go down as pension gains significance in weight. LTA, HTA however stay at the same weights. Note also that transport allowance has a weight of 3% at this stage. As TA stays the same the weight reduces as one goes up the pay level. The other significant item in terms of weight is the House building subsidy (8%). It however reduces in significance as we go up the level as the amount stays the same.
XLRI Jamshedpur
58
Estimating cost to government
6.12.1 CTG general category (special functions/geographies)
Cost to Government in the North East and Island areas is given below. Apart from the allowances, they are in receipt of an annual leave travel concession for which they forego the LTC/HTA available for the civilians. Table 6-8: CTG general category-special geographies
Post/Grade CTG in NE
in C and
part C
CTG in
NE in
PartB
CTG in
Port blair
CTG in
CAR
Nicobar
S1 9,489 9,589 9,941 10,167
S2 9,973 10,073 10,432 10,662
S3 10,092 10,192 10,555 10,789
S4 10,411 10,511 10,885 11,126
S5 11,449 11,549 11,992 12,271
S6 11,893 11,993 12,453 12,743
S7 14,392 14,592 15,222 15,542
S8 15,948 16,148 16,834 17,192
S9 17,534 17,734 18,476 18,871
S10 19,020 19,220 20,019 20,451
S11 22,147 22,447 23,358 23,915
S12 22,025 22,325 23,236 23,794
S13 24,704 25,004 26,022 26,651
S14 24,847 25,147 26,171 26,803
S15 26,544 26,844 27,924 28,594
S16 29,380 29,680 30,872 31,617
S17 29,380 29,680 30,872 31,617
S18 33,087 33,387 34,729 35,573
S19 32,216 32,516 33,821 34,641
S20 34,737 35,037 36,415 37,283
S21 40,065 40,365 41,895 42,865
S22 42,192 42,492 44,106 45,132
S23 40,065 40,365 41,895 42,865
S24 46,587 46,887 48,676 49,819
S25 48,799 49,099 50,977 52,180
S26 52,539 52,839 54,864 56,164
S27 52,539 52,839 54,864 56,164
XLRI Jamshedpur
59
Estimating cost to government
S28 46,587 46,887 48,676 49,819
S29 59,675 59,975 62,225 63,675
S30 69,772 70,072 72,772 74,522
S31 69,732 70,032 72,732 74,482
S32 74,100 74,400 77,286 79,160
S33 79,847 80,147 83,252 85,272
S34 90,609 90,909 94,464 96,784
XLRI Jamshedpur
60
Estimating cost to government
7 CTG FOR RAILWAY EMPLOYEES In this section we have presented the CTG for railway employees. The constituents of
pay and benefits for railway employees are almost the same as the general category
employees except for railway passes and a special category called running staff.
7.1 Constituents of gross pay for railway employees
The gross pay of railway employees is arrived at adding, Basic pay (taken at the
beginning of the pay scale), dearness pay, dearness allowance; house rent allowance, city
compensatory allowance and transport allowance. The gross pay for reach level is given
below. Please note that, the calculation is at the the entry level of each scale.
7.1.1 List of allowances for railway employees
The railway employees have the same set of allowances as the general category viz.
dearness allowance; house rent allowance, city compensatory allowance and transport
allowance. All these are added to the gross pay. Function specific allowance like
Washing allowance, Night duty allowance, National holiday allowance, goods train
special duty allowances, breakdown allowance, night patrolling allowance (given during
monsoon for those employees entrusted with inspecting the railway tracks), risk
allowance etc. are not added to the gross pay due to the special nature of the allowances
which makes only those performing those specific duties eligible for the allowances. The
list of allowances for railways can be seen in the appendix.
We have, however, added running allowances for running staff by treating the running
staff as a separate category of employees. Gross pay and CTG for running staff will be
separately discussed below.
XLRI Jamshedpur
61
Estimating cost to government
8 COST OF THE BENEFITS OF RLY. EMPLOYEES The list of benefits for railway employees includes almost all the benefits of the general
category civilian employees:
• Education allowance
• Newspapers
• Telephones
• Pension
• Medical facilities
(The railway employees do not contribute to CGHS like the general category
employees)
• Gratuity
• Housing, computer and vehicle loan benefits
• Leave encashment
• Computer at home for certain levels
They do not have LTC or HTC, but have railway passes the cost of which is discussed in
the next section. The details of all the benefits available to Railway Employees, including
those to running staff, are shown in the table below :-
XLRI Jamshedpur
62
Estimating cost to government
Table 8-1: package details Railway employees
CTC A Gross pay B Benefits C Variable pay Standard package Basic pay
Dearness pay Dearness allowance HRA CCA Transport allowance
Telephones Newspapers Children Education Assistance Railway Passes Pension Gratuity Leave encashment Home Loan Subsidy, Vehicle Loan Subsidy, Computer Loan Subsidy Group Insurance Medical Facilities Leave Computer at home at certain level Bungalow Peons at certain levels Honorarium
Productivity Linked Bonus for non gazetted staff
Package for special functions
A+B+C as above + some/any of the following or all of the following Washing Allowance Overtime Allowance Non-Practicing Allowance (doctors) Nursing Allowance (nurses) Conveyance Allowance (doctors) Cash Handling Allowance Split Duty Allowance National Holiday Allowance Training Allowance Sumptuary Allowance Night patrolling Allowance (gang men) PCO Allowance Qualification Allowance Out Turn Allowance Daily Officiating Allowance Cell Allowance Night Duty Allowance Ration Allowance (for RPF) Kit Maintenance Allowance Uniform Allowance Cycle Maintenance Allowance
XLRI Jamshedpur
63
Estimating cost to government
8.1 Railway Passes
The Railways get passes in lieu of LTC, and they get it every year. The calculation of the
railway pass expenses are shown to be similar to that of LTC except that each pass can be
used every year and not once in four years.
The employees get 3 passes up to a certain level and six passes thereafter. Each pass
entitles the employee to take his/her family across the country and back. We have
assumed a distance of 1000 KM and assumed a family size that varies across the levels.
At S1 the family size is assumed to be 3 while at S30 and S31, we have assumed a family
size of 3 and S32 and above a family size of 2. The cost is arrived at assuming that the
family utilizes the available passes traveling a distance of 1000 km in the class of travel
that the employee is eligible.
Package for special geography
A+B+C as in the first row + any/some of the following: Hill Compensatory Allowance Island Area Special Allowance Special Duty Allowance Special Compensatory Allowance Remote Area, Border Area, Hard Area, Tribal Area Allowance Bad Climate Allowance Tenure Allowance Sunderban Allowance
Additional Allowances/Benefits of running staff
Kilometrage Allowance/ Allowance in lieu of kilometrage Allowance in lieu of Running Room Breach of Rest Allowance Outstation (Detention Allowance) Outstation (Retrieving Allowance) Accident Allowance Officiating Allowance shunting Duty Allowance Waiting Duty Allowance Minimum Guaranteed Kilometrage Incentive Scheme for through Goods Train Trip Allowance Pay Element (30%) for calculating DA, CCA, HRA, OTA, PLB, Leave Salary etc.Retirement Benefit – 55% of basic pay for computing Retirement Benefits
XLRI Jamshedpur
64
Estimating cost to government
Table 8-2: CTG of Railway passes
Grade Pay at the minimum of pay scale
Passes
S1 2550 506
S2 2610 506
S3 2650 506
S4 2750 506
S5 3050 506
S6 3200 506
S7 4000 506
S8 4500 1950
S9 5000 1950
S10 5500 1950
S11 6500 1950
S12 6500 1950
S13 7450 1950
S14 7500 1950
S15 8000 2732
S19 10000 2732
S21 12000 2732
S24 14300 2732
S26 16400 2732
S29 18400 9364
S30 22400 9364
S31 22400 9364
S32 24050 7023
S33 26000 4682
8.2 Cost of passes post retirement
Railway employees are eligible for passes even after retirement. We are costing them in
the package by looking at how much should the government save in a fund assuming that
the railway tickets would increase by three times. We assume that the employee will
travel only two times a year post retirement along with his wife; the duration of such
passes have been taken for a period of 20 years post retirement.
XLRI Jamshedpur
65
Estimating cost to government
Table 8-3: CTG of Railway passes post retirement
cost of passes post retirement
S1 41
S2 41
S3 41
S4 41
S5 41
S6 41
S7 41
S8 118
S9 118
S10 118
S11 118
S12 118
S13 118
S14 118
S15 165
S19 165
S21 165
S24 165
S26 165
S29 283
S30 283
S31 283
S32 283
S33 283
XLRI Jamshedpur
66
Estimating cost to government
8.3 Running staff (railways)
We have shown the CTG of Running staff separately due the differences in their pay.
Running staff have two important differences in their pay. The first is that their pay
component has a huge variable pay based on running kilometers. This component a very
necessary (and apparently effective) component gives in hand a very high gross pay to
the running staff. We have cost the minimum alternative pay that the running staff will
receive if they do not run many kilometers. These are not assumptions but facts;
nevertheless the apparent difference in costing running staff pay stands out due to this. Table 8-4: Running staff pay scale
Post / Grade Basic Salary Annual Increment Final Payment
S4 2750.00 72.50 4400.00 S5 3050.00 77.50 4590.00 S7 4000.00 100.00 6000.00 S8 4500.00 125.00 7000.00 S9 5000.00 150.00 8000.00 S10 5500.00 175.00 9000.00 6000.00 9800.00 S12 6500.00 200.00 10500.00 S13 7450.00 225.00 11500.00
The second aspect is that their HRA, CCA etc. are cost at 130% of basic plus DP of the
corresponding pay-scale. Their benefits and eventually their pension also go higher due
to this fact.
The CTG for running staff will be displayed after the CTG along with the CTG of all the
levels of other railway employees.
The pension of the running staff is more than the pension of the other railway employees
by 55%.
This increases the amount the government has to save every month. The contribution
comes to 40% per month as against 30% for others.
XLRI Jamshedpur
67
Estimating cost to government
8.4 Bungalow Peon (not in CTG)
Some levels and above in the railways have a peon. But this peon is attached to the
position and hence not a benefit the employee is receiving. Hence the cost of the peon is
not added to the compensation costs to the employee.
XLRI Jamshedpur
68
Estimating cost to government
8.5 CTG of representative levels in the railways
The cost to company for railway employees categorized by class of city is displayed here. Table 8-5: CTG of representative levels in railways in different class of cities
Post/Grade CTG per month for A1 city
A class city
B1 class city
B2 class city
C class city
Unclassified city
S1 10489 9886 9831 9801 9479 9383
S2 10961 10344 10289 10259 9930 9832
S3 11086 10460 10405 10375 10042 9942
S4 11420 10771 10716 10686 10342 10239
S5 12428 11692 11617 11582 11174 11059
S6 12895 12125 12050 12015 11590 11470
S7 15623 14663 14578 14518 13948 13798
S8 18646 17573 17488 17428 16802 16633
S9 19654 18469 18384 18324 17642 17454
S10 21707 20410 20325 20265 19526 19320
S11 25009 23487 23227 23167 22316 22072
S12 25089 23567 23307 23247 22396 22152
S13 27940 26204 25944 25884 24926 24646
S14 27646 25898 25638 25578 24615 24333
S15 30477 28617 28157 28097 27077 26777
S16 33479 31394 30934 30874 29742 29404
S19 37048 34738 34278 34218 32973 32598
S21 44520 41760 41300 41240 39770 39320
S24 51388 48110 47650 47590 45862 45325
S26 64161 60411 59951 59891 57926 57311
S29 70183 65983 65523 65463 63273 62583
S30 81379 76279 75819 75759 73119 72279
S31 78998 73898 73438 73378 70738 69898
S32 81272 75801 75341 75281 72456 71554
S33 87812 81902 81442 81382 78337 77362
XLRI Jamshedpur
69
Estimating cost to government
Table 8-6: CTG of Running staff (railways)
Post/Grade CTG per month for A1
A B1 B2 C Unclassified
S4 16761 15907 15832 15797 15330 15196
S5 18387 17445 17370 17335 16824 16675
S7 23724 22494 22409 22349 21644 21449
S8 26383 25006 24921 24861 24083 23864
S9 28729 27206 27121 27061 26210 25966
S10 30663 28994 28909 28849 27925 27657
32957 31142 30882 30822 29825 29532
S12 35671 33710 33450 33390 32319 32002
S13 39342 37103 36843 36783 35574 35210
XLRI Jamshedpur
70
Estimating cost to government
9 CTG - ARMED FORCES This section calculates the cost to government for the armed forces. The armed forces are
vastly different from the civilian employees when it comes to pay. Their pay scales are
different, the no. of levels is different and the list of allowances and benefits they have is
also different. However the gross pay that they get has the same set of items that a
civilian (general category) government employee has. We shall look at the gross pay and
then at the benefits.
9.1 Constituents of gross pay for armed forces
The gross pay for armed forces consists of the following items:
• Basic pay (calculated at the midpoint of the pay-scale
• Dearness pay
• Dearness allowance
• Rank pay for Officers
• HRA for Officers
• CILQ (compensation in lieu of quarters for PBOR (personnel below officer rank))
since combatants in barracks are not in receipt of HRA
• CCA
• Classification allowance
o For PBOR only in the army (not in navy and air force)
• Kit maintenance allowance
• Transport Allowance
• Uniform allowance
There are a number of allowances that the armed forces have which we have not added to
the gross pay as they are specific either functionally or geographically. Uniform is given
XLRI Jamshedpur
71
Estimating cost to government
in the form of cash once in 7 years. Since it is given in the form of cash and the
difference is only in the label, it is added as an allowance (after dividing the amount by
84) to the gross pay. The same is not done for PBORs as they get the uniform in kind.
9.2 Pay scales in the armed forces
As brought out earlier, the pay scales of Armed Forces Personnel are different from those
of civilians. For the purpose of working out the CTG, we have concentrated on the
package available in the Army to Officers and to the Group Y of Army PBORs as they
constitute the largest numbers. The CTG of Naval and Air Force personnel as well as
other groups in the Army will be broadly similar. Table 9-1: Pay scale of officers of the three forces
Rank Pay Scale
Lieutenant/ Sub Lieutenant/ Flying Officer Rs.8250-300-10050
Captain/Lieutenant/Flt. Lieutenant Rs.9600-300-11400+ rank pay ofRs.400
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn.Leader Rs.11600-325-14850-+rank pay of Rs.1200
Lt. Colonel/Commander/Wg. Commander Rs.13500-400-17100-+rank pay of Rs.1600
Colonel/Captain/Gp Captain Rs.15100-450-17350-+rank pay of Rs.2000
Brigadier/Commodore/Air Commodore Rs.16700-450-18050+rank pay of Rs.2400
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal Rs.18400-500-22400
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal Rs.22400-525-24500
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C Rs.26000/-
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff Rs.30000/-
XLRI Jamshedpur
72
Estimating cost to government
Table 9-2: Pay scale of PBOR(S)
Personnel Below Officer Rank (Army)
ARMY
Rank
Combatant
Group ‘X’
Combatant
Group ‘Y’
Combantant
Group ‘Z’
Sub Major 7250-200-10050 6750-200-9550 6600-200-9400
Subedar 6750-190-9790 6600-170-9320 6170-155-8650
Nb Subedar 5770-140-8290 5620-140-8140 5200-125-7450
Hav 4150-100-5650 3600-100-5100 3250-85-4525
Naik 3700-85-4975 3425-85-4700 3150-70-4200
Sepoy 3600-70-4650 3250-70-4300 3050-55-3875
Personnel Below Officer Rank (Navy)
Rank Combatant
Group ‘X’
Rank Combatant
Group ‘Y’
Combantant
Group ‘Z’
MCPO I 7400-200-10200 MCPO I 6750-200-9550 6600-200-9400
MCPO II 6750-190-9790 MCPO II 6600-170-9320 6170-155-8650
Chief Art 6000-125-8250 CPO 5620-140-8140 5200-125-7450
ART III-I 5120-100-7120 Petty Officer 4320-85-5595 3775-85-5050
ART IV 4550-100-6350 Leading
Seaman
3900-70-4950 3200-70-4250
ART V 4150-70-4360 Seaman I 3650-60-4550 3080-60-3980
APP 3200-60-3260 Seaman II 3325-60-3445 2865-55-3140
XLRI Jamshedpur
73
Estimating cost to government
Personnel Below Officer Rank (Air Force)
Rank Combatant
Group ‘X’
Combatant
Group ‘Y’
Combantant
Group ‘Z’
MWO 7400-200-10200 6750-200-9550 6600-200-9400
WO 6750-190-9790 6600-170-9320 6170-155-8650
JWO 5770-140-8290 5620-140-8140 5200-125-7450
SGT 4670-85-5945 4320-85-5595 3775-85-5050
CPL 4150-70-5200 3900-70-4950 3200-70-4250
LAC 4025-60-4925 3650-60-4550 3080-60-3980
AC 3675 3250 3050
9.2.1 List of allowances for armed forces
The list of allowances for the armed forces excluding the standard allowances like
dearness allowance, house rent allowance, City compensatory allowance etc. are quite
large compared to the general category employees owing to their nature of occupation
that requires generalists and specialists both operating sometimes in very difficult to live
geographies.
The allowances can be broadly classified into geographical and functional allowances.
The geographical allowances are
• Field area allowance
o Which has gradation of three levels with the highest classification being
highly active field area allowance
• Special compensatory allowance (during counter insurgency operations)
• High altitude uncongenial climate (in varying degrees)
In the next page we see a complete list of the package for the armed forces.
XLRI Jamshedpur
74
Estimating cost to government
Table 9-3: Package of pay, benefits and allowances for armed forces
CTC A Gross pay B Benefits C Variable pay Standard package
• Basic pay • Rank Pay for officers • Dearness pay • Dearness allowance • CILQ/ HRA • CCA • Transport allowance • Kit Maintenance
Allowance/ Composite Personal Maintenance Allowance
• Telephones • Newspapers • Children Education Assistance • Leave Travel Concession • Home Travel Concession • Form D/ Concession Vouchers • Pension • Gratuity • Leave encashment • Home Loan Subsidy, Vehicle
Loan Subsidy, • Computer Loan Subsidy • Group Insurance • Medical Facilities • Leave • Computer at home at certain
levels • Lower license Fee • Concession in Electricity &
Water changes • Free Rations & Free Transport for
school going children (Sahayaks)
Non-productivity linked bonus for PBORs
Package for special functions or qualifications
A+B+C as above + any/some of the following or all of the following • Non-Practicing Allowance (doctors) • Post Graduate Allowance (doctors) • Specialist Allowance (doctors) • Flying Allowance • Submarine Allowance • Technical Allowance • MARCOS Allowance • Special Compensatory Counter Insurgency Allowance (in field) (in modified field) (in
peace) • Handling Money (Navy) • Sea Going Allowance (Naval Officers) • Sea Duty Allowance (PBOR) • Submarine Technical Allowance • Hydrographic Survey Allowance • Project Allowance • Qualification Pay/ Grant • Special Forces Allowance • Para Allowance/ Para Reserve Allowance • Para Jump Instructor Allowance • Language Award/ Allowance • JAG Departmental Exam Allowance
XLRI Jamshedpur
75
Estimating cost to government
• Air Dispatch Pay • Spectacles Allowance • Diving Allowance • Dip Money • Acting Allowance • Aeronautical Technical Allowance • Air Steward Allowance • Air worthiness Certificate Allowance • Flight Change Certificate Allowance • Test Pilot & Flight Test Engineer Allowance • Good Conduct Badge Pay • Shorthand Allowance Unit Charge & Change Certificate Allowance
Package for special geography
A+B+C as in the first row + any/some all of the following: • Island Area Special Allowance • Special Duty Allowance • Special Compensatory Allowance • Remote Area, Border Area, Hard Area, Tribal Area Allowance • Bad Climate Allowance • Highly Active Field Area Allowance • Field Area Allowance • Modified Field Area Allowance • Siachen Allowance • High Altitude Allowance • Hard Area Allowance • Bhutan Compensatory Allowance
XLRI Jamshedpur
76
Estimating cost to government
10 COST OF BENEFITS FOR ARMED FORCES
The army stands to benefit a lot from the following benefits. Given that they are usually
living in places that makes it difficult for them to live a “normal” life as compared to
civilians, they enjoy a number of benefits. Also given that the nutrition of armed forces is
critical to the safety of the nation, they receive benefits with respect to food too. Given
below are the benefits that they get and the assumptions used in pricing these. The
objective with respect to pricing the following and the rest of the benefits above has been
that the pricing should be conservative so as to not project an unusually high monetary
value.
We shall list below the benefits armed forces are in receipt of and included in the
calculation of CTG:
1. Newspaper
2. Telephone
3. Pension
4. Gratuity
5. Leave travel concessions
6. Form D / concession voucher
7. Ration
8. Children conveyance
9. canteen
10. electricity and water
XLRI Jamshedpur
77
Estimating cost to government
10.1 Pension for armed forces
Armed forces receive a defined benefit pension just as the other government employees.
The pension for PBOR forces is computed in a similar manner as the others with the
following differences:
1. Pension is calculated at the maximum of the pay scale
2. Weight is added to qualifying service for calculation of pension as the PBOR(s)
spend less time in service
3. The number of years this pension is paid is also much more than the number of
years for a civlian government employee.
This means that the government has to contribute much more per month in order to
give a defined benefit pension for the armed forces. The government for example has
to save hypothetically 74% of the basic pay of a Sepoy (calculated at the minimum of
the pay scale) every month.
Rank Minimum of the
payscale
Percentage of the
previous column
Amount per month
deposited to the pension
account
Sub Major 6,750.00 35 2025
Subedar 6,600.00 35 1980
Nb Subedar 5,620.00 35 1686
Hav 3,600.00 40 1260
Naik 3,425.00 60 1884
Sepoy 3,250.00 74 1983
For officers we have retained the 30% of basic pay as monthly contribution to the
hypothetical pension fund even though the retirement of officers vary from 52 years to 62
years for different ranks.
XLRI Jamshedpur
78
Estimating cost to government
10.1.1 Calculation of Pension for Sepoy
The calculations have two phases. The first is the growth of Salary. For calculation of the
exact pension amount the maximum of the pay range is taken into account. We have
doubled the basic pay arrived after the 17th year as the Sepoy gets 50% of the maximum
of the pay scale. The amount is multiplied by a factor to take into account the early
retirement (27/33) in case of Sepoy.
50% of this amount is the pension (45% of which he can commute). Table 10-1: calculation of pension for sepoy
Sepoy 74%
Basic DA Total
1.00 3,250.00 0.00 3,250.00 2,409.88 28,918.50 99,073.12
2.00 3,315.00 198.90 3,513.90 2,458.07 29,496.87 93,569.06
3.00 3,381.30 405.76 3,787.06 2,507.23 30,086.81 88,370.78
4.00 3,448.93 620.81 4,069.73 2,557.38 30,688.54 83,461.29
5.00 3,517.90 844.30 4,362.20 2,608.53 31,302.31 78,824.55
6.00 3,588.26 1,076.48 4,664.74 2,660.70 31,928.36 74,445.41
7.00 3,660.03 1,317.61 4,977.64 2,713.91 32,566.93 70,309.55
8.00 3,733.23 1,567.96 5,301.18 2,768.19 33,218.27 66,403.47
9.00 4,036.37 1,827.79 5,864.16 2,992.97 35,915.59 66,477.25
10.00 4,364.12 2,223.23 6,587.35 3,235.99 38,831.94 66,551.11
11.00 7,460.17 0.00 7,460.17 5,531.72 66,380.63 105,337.72
12.00 7,609.38 456.56 8,065.94 5,642.35 67,708.24 99,485.62
13.00 8,059.97 931.39 8,991.36 5,976.47 71,717.63 97,571.05
14.00 8,221.17 1,479.81 9,700.98 6,096.00 73,151.98 92,150.43
15.00 8,385.60 2,012.54 10,398.14 6,217.92 74,615.02 87,030.96
16.00 8,553.31 2,565.99 11,119.30 6,342.28 76,107.32 82,195.91
17.00 8,724.37 3,140.77 11,865.15 6,469.12 77,629.47 77,629.47
1,428,886.77
1,428,026.42
XLRI Jamshedpur
79
Estimating cost to government
In the above calculation, the pay grows till the 17th year when the sepoy retires. When he
retires, given his age, his multiplying factor for grant of commutation is much more at
15.64. The pension is assumed to be paid for a period of 10 years more than that of the
civilians.
10.2 Ration
Armed forces are in receipt of ration in the form of food to take care of their nutritional
requirements. The money equivalent of ration is cost, though the benefit they get is
substantial. The cost to government is the monetary alternative that the government is
willing to give if the government is unable to provide the ration. This amounts to Rs.
32.16 per day for PBOR and 32.35 per day for service officers.
10.3 Canteen
Armed forces employees can purchase their groceries and goods for monthly personal
needs at subsidized prices. The employee need not have to pay taxes on these goods. But
the cost providing this benefit is much more than the taxes. The administrative cost that is
needed to run the entire machinery is huge. But given the lack of data on all the costs that
go into providing this benefit, the team has assumed a minimal average expenditure for
which the tax exemption namely, 12% VAT is the benefit for the employee. Looking at
the consumer expenditure table for urban area consumers, the per capita consumption
averages at around 1000 Rs. (Refer Annexure 3). This is one of the few instances where
we have focused on the benefits and cost the cost of providing the benefit. Table 10-2: CTG per month due to ration and canteen
Serving officers
Rank Ration Canteen
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 971 120
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 971 120
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 971 120
Lt. Colonel/Commander/Wg.Commander 971 120
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 971 120
XLRI Jamshedpur
80
Estimating cost to government
Brigadier/Commondore/Air Commondore 971 120
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 971 120
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 971 120
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 971 120
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 971 120
PBOR
Rank Ration Canteen
Sub Major 964.80 72.00
Subedar 964.80 72.00
Nb Subedar 964.80 72.00
Hav 964.80 72.00
Naik 964.80 72.00
Sepoy 964.80 72.00
10.4 Electricity and water
Armed forces get subsidy in electricity and water and hence a nominal charge has been
added as a cost. We added 100 rs per month as electricity charges for Officers Since in
the calculations we are using CILQ (Compensation in lieu of quarters) for PBORs which
includes furniture allowance (discussed later) and cost of electricity and water there is no
separate costing for electricity and water in the calculation of CTC for PBORs.
10.5 Children conveyance
Armed forces get conveyance for their children’s school transport for which a nominal
charge (Rs. 150 per month) has been added uniformly.
10.6 LTC
LTC for armed forces are more pronounced in terms of benefits and hence modified
suitably to reflect the additional benefits. For example officers and PBORs get extra
LTC, and are also in receipt of concession forms. Using a family size that varies with
XLRI Jamshedpur
81
Estimating cost to government
levels reaching a maximum size of four, and a standard distance similar to the LTC for
the general category of government employees the LTC benefit for army has been
calculated.
Unlike the general category, the LTC distance for armed forces has been calculated at the
maximum permitted distance (with respect to the annual leave travel concession) which is
1450 km. Thus the cost to government looks marginally high in comparison to the
general category.
The armed forces have a home travel concession every two years. Every year they can
avail of a leave travel concession. Apart from this they can travel in times of need at 60%
of the actual cost of travel. This benefit using Form-D is also shown as a cost to
government. Flying personnel and similar personnel in the navy can avail of a special
LTC which have not been shown in the CTG due their special nature.
XLRI Jamshedpur
82
Estimating cost to government
For a PBOR, who is eligible to go by sleeper class, it costs 337 Rs. one way. For the
personnel eligible in the ac three tier it costs the government 975 and 1366 for A/C two
tiers. A/C first class costs 2341 and air costs 8000 Rs. The table below shows the per
month cost to government:- Table 10-3: Leave travel concession(s) for armed forces
Rank HTC LTCA Form D
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 342 683 273
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 455 911 273
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 455 911 273
Lt. Colonel/Commander/Wg.Commander 455 911 273
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 455 911 273
Brigadier/Commondore/Air Commondore 780 1561 468
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 2000 4000 468
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 2000 4000 468
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 1333 2667 468
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 1333 2667 468
10.7 Reimbursement for hiring of Furniture
Armed forces are in receipt of furniture or reimbursement of cost of hiring furniture.
They can rent furniture from the market. For imputing value, the concession-al rates for
hiring of furniture have been used. This monetary equivalent undervalues the actual
benefit. For PBORs we are calculating their gross pay and CTG using CILQ instead of
HRA. Hence we are not adding furniture hiring reimbursement to their package.
10.8 Leave
Armed forces are in receipt of extra leave owing to their conditions of service. The extra
leave is definitely a cost to government and we have added the cost of extra leave into the
CTG as a benefit.
The extra leave is calculated as follows:
XLRI Jamshedpur
83
Estimating cost to government
General category civilian employees get 50 days Eligible leave(30 days earned leave plus
20 days half pay leave plus 8 days casual leave + 2 days restricted holiday) per year.
Armed forces have 90 days leave (excluding sick leave). (Officers- 60 days earned leave,
20 days CL, 20 days half-pay leave, (Sick leave not included and PBORs have 60 days
EL, 30 days casual leave but no half pay leave is payable)).
Since he/she can en-cash 300 days during retirement we calculate cost of the extra leave
of absence benefit available to the armed forces at 40 days per annum.
10.9 Housing loan
For the armed forces we have shown housing loan benefit similar to that of the general
category, except that the total amount of loan is limited to a maximum of Rs 2, 10, 000.
10.10 Sahayaks (Not in CTG)
Sahayaks are a privilege to the position posted at the residences of Army officers.
Officers at the senior level of all the three forces are also entitled to staff at home. Any
privilege to the position that is given to enhance the productivity of the position viz.
secretary and which do not benefit the person personally or his family cannot be added
under compensation. These benefits are not being added to the CTG.
10.11 Group insurance benefit (not in CTG)
The Armed forces manage their own group insurance fund; they contribute on their own
and also reap benefits from it. Since Government does not directly contribute to the group
insurance of armed forces we have not added group insurance benefit in the CTC of
armed forces.
XLRI Jamshedpur
84
Estimating cost to government
10.12 The CTG of armed forces
10.12.1 Table of benefits for armed forces
Below is the list of benefits shown as part of CTG and the amount for each level for officers Table 10-4: Table of benefits (armed forces officers)
Rank Tuition Newsp Telephones pension Gratuity computers Ration HTA LTCA Form D
Special LTC
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 0 0 2475 411 971 342 683 273 114
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 40 0 0 2880 411 126 971 455 911 273 114 Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 80 0 0 3480 411 126 971 455 911 273 114 Lt.Colonel /Commander / Wg.Commander 80 0 0 4050 411 126 971 455 911 273 114
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 80 80 1500 4530 411 126 971 455 911 273 114 Brigadier/Commodore/Air Commodore 80 80 1500 5010 411 126 971 780 1561 468 195
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 40 160 1800 5520 411 126 971 2000 4000 468 667
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 240 1800 6720 411 126 971 2000 4000 468 667
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 240 2800 7800 411 126 971 1333 2667 468 667
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 240 2800 9000 411 126 971 1333 2667 468 667
XLRI Jamshedpur
85
Estimating cost to government
Rank H loan
Benefit
Car loan
subsidy
Compute
r Loan
subsidy
Childc
onveya
nce
cante
en
Medical
care
Leaves post
retirement
M
Leave
encashme
nt
Furnitur
e
Elecy Water
Sum of
all
benefits
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 664 80 120 738 1375 538 541 124 200 50 9584
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 664 80 126 150 120 984 1667 538 629 176 200 50 11324
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 664 80 126 300 120 984 2188 538 760 216 200 50 12806
Lt. Colonel / Commander / Wg.Commander 664 762 126 300 120 984 2517 538 885 216 200 50 14512
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 664 762 126 300 120 984 2850 538 990 216 200 50 17010
Brigadier/Commodore/Air Commodore 664 762 126 300 120 984 3183 538 1095 216 200 50 19098
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 664 762 126 150 120 984 3067 538 1206 302 200 50 23538
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 664 762 126 0 120 738 3733 538 1468 302 200 50 25311
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 664 762 126 0 120 667 4333 538 1704 638 200 50 26492
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 664 762 126 0 120 667 5000 538 1967 638 200 50 28621
XLRI Jamshedpur
86
Estimating cost to government
10.12.2 Table of benefits for PBOR (army)
Please note that Non productivity linked bonus has been added as part of benefits to the PBOR. The table below shows benefits only for
army. Table 10-5: Table of benefits for armed forces (PBOR)
Chldren conv
Ration Canteen Pension Gratuity HTA LTC Add.Rail Conc
Leaves Leave En
Medical Medical post
retirement
Vehicle Ad
Hloan Benefit
Sum of All
B∗
Sub Major 300 965 72 2363 451 325 650 364 1125 447 984 538 80 664 9608
Subedar 300 965 72 2310 641 325 650 364 1100 456 984 538 80 664 9730
Nb Subedar 300 965 72 1967 767 325 650 364 937 399 984 538 80 664 9293
Hav 300 965 72 1440 640 112 225 134 600 263 984 538 80 664 7299
Naik 300 965 72 2055 579 112 225 134 571 260 984 1046 80 664 8327
Sepoy 150 965 72 2405 479 84 169 134 542 251 738 1520 80 664 8494
∗ Sum of all benefits includes a non-productivity linked bonus of Rs. 202 per month.
XLRI Jamshedpur
87
Estimating cost to government
Table 10-6: Gross pay for Officers
C city C city Officers Rank
Gross pay for A1 city
Gross pay for A city
Gross pay for B1 city
Gross pay for B city
Gross pay for C city
Armed forces in Siachen
Armed Forces in HFAA&RLA
Gross pay with High Altitude +remote locality allowance High Al Area+Remote
Gross pay with flying allowance in a B1 city
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 21790 19874 19414 19354 18306 28386 21386 20096 23914
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 26121 23811 23351 23291 22046 32221 25221 23971 28851
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 33856 30843 30383 30323 28726 39114 32114 30934 37383
Lt. Colonel/Commander/Wg.Commander 38744 35286 34826 34766 32948 43581 36581 35281 41826
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 43694 39786 39326 39266 37223 47781 40781 39481 46326
Brigadier/Commondore/Air Commondore 48644 44286 43826 43766 41498 51981 44981 43681 49076
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 46911 42711 42251 42191 40001 50511 43511 42211 47501
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 56811 51711 51251 51191 48551 58911 51911 50611 56501
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 65721 59811 59351 59291 56246 66471 59471 58171 64601
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 75621
XLRI Jamshedpur
88
Estimating cost to government
Table 10-7: CTG of armed forces (officers)
Officers Rank
CTG for A1 City
CTG for A City
CTG for B1 City
CTG for B2 City
CTG for C City
CTG for C City with siachen
CTG for C City with HFAA and RLA
CTG for C City HAA and RL
CTG for B1 city with Fly all &SLTC
Lieutnant/Sub Lieutnant/Flying Officer 31374 29458 28998 28938 27890 38085 30971 29681 33612
Captain/Lieutnant/Flt. Lieutnant 37446 35136 34676 34616 33371 43660 36546 35296 40290
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn Leader 46662 43649 43189 43129 41532 52034 44920 43740 50303
Lt. Colonel/Commander/Wg.Commander 53256 49798 49338 49278 47460 58207 51093 49793 56452
Colonel/Captain/Gp. Captain 60704 56797 56337 56277 54233 64906 57792 56492 63451
Brigadier/Commondore/Air Commondore 67742 63385 62925 62865 60596 71275 64080 62780 68370
Major General/Rear Admiral/Air Vice Marshal 70450 66250 65790 65730 63540 74716 67050 65750 71706
Lieutenant General/Vice Admiral/Air Marshal 82123 77023 76563 76503 73863 84889 77223 75923 82479
Vice Chief/Army Commander/FoC-in-C/AOC-in-C 92213 86303 85843 85783 82738 93630 85963 84663 91760
Chief of Army Staff/Naval Staff/Air Staff 104242
XLRI Jamshedpur
89
Estimating cost to government
Table 10-8: Gross pay (PBOR)
Rank
Gross pay for
A1 class city
Gross pay for A
Gross pay for B1
Gross pay for B
Gross pay for C
Gross pay for
unclassified
Gross pay for
unclassified in Siachen
Gross pay for CHFAA
Sub Major 17294 15884 15624 15564 14994 14694 22271 17604
Subedar 16990 15580 15320 15260 14690 14390 21967 17300
Nb Subedar 15006 13596 13336 13276 12706 12406 19983 15316
Hav 9915 8815 8740 8705 8340 8100 14707 10040
Naik 9261 8311 8236 8201 7836 7686 13973 9306
Sepoy 8906 7956 7881 7846 7481 7331 13618 8951
Table 10-9: CTG PBOR(S)
CTG A1 class city CTG for A
CTG for
B1 CTG for B CTG for C
CTG for
unclassified
CTG
unclassified
in Siachen
CTG for
CHFAA
Sub Major
27104 25694 25434 25374 24804 24504 32081 27212
Subedar 26720 25310 25050 24990 24420 24120 31697 27030
Nb Subedar
24299 22889 22629 22569 21999 21699 29276 24609
Hav 17214 16114 16039 16004 15639 15399 22006 17339
Naik 17588 16638 16563 16528 16163 16013 22300 17633
Sepoy 17400 16450 16375 16340 15975 15825 22112 17445
XLRI Jamshedpur
90
Estimating cost to government
Figure 10-1: Sepoy CTG Pie Chart
sepoy CTG breakup
TPBA40%
Pension15%
Ration6%
Gratuity3%
HTA1%
LTC1%
Leaves7%
Leave En1%
Medical4%
Medical post retirement
9%
HBA benefit4%
Chldren conveyance1%CCA A1
1%
Clas All1%
Additional Rail Concession
1%
Canteen0%
CILQ C4%
TA0%
CPMA0%ReimbTFe
0%
TPBAClas AllCCA A1CILQ CTAReimbTFeCPMAChldren conveyanceRationCanteenPensionGratuityHTALTCAdditional Rail ConcessionLeavesLeave EnMedicalMedical post retirementHBA benefit
The Sepoy’s CTG is heavily influenced by the fact that he spends only 17 years in
service. This has increased the cost of his benefits with pension constituting about 15% of
his CTG. The combined cost of medical facilities during and after service comes to about
the same weight as pension.
XLRI Jamshedpur
91
Estimating cost to government
Figure 10-2: CTG Pie Chart Major/Lt. Cdr/Sqdrn. Leader
Major/Sqdn Leader/Lt Cdr
BP+DP+DA57%
KMA0%
Form D1%
Special LTC0%
canteen0%
Gratuity1%
Ration2%
Childconveyance1%
LTCA 2%
HTA1%
pension7%
Transport Allowance2%Uniform Al
0%
Tuition0% HRA
13%
CCA1%
Medical care2%
Leaves5%
post retirementM1%
Leave encashment2%
Water0%
Elecy0%
Furniture0%Computer Loan subsidy
0%
Car loan subsidy0%
H loan Benefit1%
BP+DP+DACCAHRATransport AllowanceUniform AlKMATuitionpensionGratuityRationHTALTCA Form DSpecial LTCH loan BenefitCar loan subsidyComputer Loan subsidyChildconveyancecanteenMedical carepost retirementMLeavesLeave encashmentFurnitureElecyWater
The above Graph shows that pension still retains a significant weight at 7% of the CTG,
while the extra leave of absence available to the armed forces comes close with 5%
weight. The rest of the benefits have maximum of 2% weight as a percentage of the CTG.
XLRI Jamshedpur
92
Estimating cost to government
11 CTG-CPMF
11.1 Constituents of gross pay for CPMF
The CPMF forces are treated similar to the civilian forces with respect to pay. But there
are some minor differences which are listed below.
• The gross pay of CPMF hence contains the same set of allowances as the general
category but the officer cadre of CPMF gets a kit maintenance allowance.
• Moreover, for those below officer level, it makes sense to calculate CILQ instead of
HRA as they are anyway on duty away from their home.
• There are however some special allowances for special cadre within CPMF.
• For example national security guards receive special allowances. They get 25%
extra pay (25% of BP+DP+DA) and also get 13.25 rupees per month as rum
allowance.
• Employees of the Intelligence bureau get 15% of their basic +DP and they can en-
cash one month’s leave annually.
• The CPMF also have detachment allowance for posting in special areas like J&K and
North east. They also are in receipt of ration money which is shown below in a table.
• In the cost to government of CRPF, personnel below officer level can avail of a
benefit of en-cashing one month’s pay if they forgo their leave. We have added this to
the CTG.
• LTC and HTC for CPMF are cost in a two year cycle as against 4 year cycle for the
general category.
• Non productivity linked bonus is shown as part of CTG for CPMF
• A tabular representation of all the benefits of CPMF personnel is given below:
XLRI Jamshedpur
93
Estimating cost to government
Table 11-1: List of components of Pay, allowances and Benefits for CPMF
CTC A Gross pay B Benefits C Variable pay Standard package Basic pay
Dearness pay Dearness allowance HRA/ CILQ CCA (at half the rates) Transport allowance Ration Money Allowance Kit Maintenance Allowance/ Washing Allowance Uniform Allowance (officers)
Telephones Newspapers Children Education Assistance Leave Travel Concession Home Travel Concession Additional LTC Pension Gratuity Leave encashment Home Loan Subsidy, Vehicle Loan Subsidy, Computer Loan Subsidy Group Insurance Medical Facilities Leave Computer at home at certain level
Non-productivity linked bonus
Package for special functions
A+B+C as above + any/some of the following or all of the following Overtime Allowance Non-Practicing Allowance (doctors) Nursing Allowance (nurses) Conveyance Allowance (doctors) Cash Handling Allowance Split Duty Allowance Deputation Allowance Allowance for Special Appointment Detachment Allowance Dog Handler Allowance Flying Allowance Training/ Institution Allowance
Package for special geography
A+B+C as in the first row + any/all of the following: Hill Compensatory Allowance Island Area Special Allowance Special Duty Allowance Special Compensatory Allowance Remote Area, Border Area, Hard Area, Tribal Area Allowance Bad Climate Allowance
•
XLRI Jamshedpur
94
Estimating cost to government
11.2 Ration
The ration money CPMF personnel receive is the only benefit that they receive as part of
being in CPMF differentiating them from the general category up to the level of
commandant is given the amount specified below.
DG
Addnl. DG
IG
DIG
Comdt 722.00
2I/C 722.00
Dy Comdt 722.00
Asst Comdt 722.00
Subedar Major 722.00
Inspector 722.00
Sub.Inspector 722.00
ASI 722.00
Havaldar/head constable 722.00
Constable 722.00
Follower 722.00
XLRI Jamshedpur
95
Estimating cost to government
Table 11-2: Table of Gross pay by City for CPMF for different class of cities
Gross pay at A1 class city
A city B1 city
B2 city
C city
Un-classified city
CILQ
DG 65236 59326 59066 59006 55961 54986 0
Addnl. DG 56326 51226 50966 50906 48266 47426 0
IG 46426 42226 41966 41906 39716 39026 0
DIG 41476 37726 37466 37406 35441 34826 0
Comdt 36278 33001 32741 32681 30952 30416 0
2I/C 30586 27826 27566 27506 26036 25586 0
Dy Comdt 25636 23326 23066 23006 21761 21386 0
Asst Comdt 20686 18826 18566 18506 17486 17186 0
Subedar Major 16638 15146 14916 14886 14094 13850 14010
Inspector 16338 14846 14791 14761 13969 13725 13885
Sub.Inspector 13863 12596 12541 12511 11832 11625 11765
ASI 10150 9220 9165 9135 8625 8475 8585
Havaldar/Head Constable
8120 7375 7325 7308 6915 6795 6889
Constable 7749 7037 6987 6970 6594 6480 6571
Follower 6622 6020 5980 5965 5654 5556 5638
XLRI Jamshedpur
96
Estimating cost to government
Table 11-3: Table of CTG for CPMF
CTG at A1 city
A class city
B1 class city
B2 class city
C class city
Un-classified city
CILQ
DG 84868 78958 78698 78638 75593 74618
Addnl. DG 74514 69414 69154 69094 66454 65614
IG 63065 58865 58605 58545 56355 55665
DIG 55906 52156 51896 51836 49871 49256
Comdt 49995 46718 46458 46398 44669 44132
2I/C 42727 39967 39707 39647 38177 37727
Dy Comdt 36406 34096 33836 33776 32531 32156
Asst Comdt 29166 27306 27046 26986 25966 25666
Subedar Major 24456 22964 22734 22704 21912 21669 21829
Inspector 24156 22664 22609 22579 21787 21544 21704
Sub.Inspector 20980 19713 19658 19628 18949 18742 18882
ASI 16055 15125 15070 15040 14530 14380 14490
Havaldar/head constable 13397 12652 12602 12585 12192 12072 12166
Constable 12619 11907 11857 11840 11464 11350 11441
Follower 11136 10533 10493 10478 10168 10070 10152
12 CTG - POSTAL EMPLOYEES There is no separate costing of compensation that we have undertaken for the postal
employees. The reason is that though they are in receipt of function specific allowances
they are very similar to the general category of government employees with respect to
pay. We have hence not calculated the cost separately.
XLRI Jamshedpur
97
Estimating cost to government
13 EMPLOYMENT SECURITY & COST OF NO-EASY-EXIT
Going by the terms of reference we have tried to focus on the aspect of security that an
employee receives due to his/her being a government employee. We have worked out the
cost of “no easy exit” in this section. Pricing of job security is very difficult. Private
sector organizations surveyed mostly feel it cannot be priced. Some feel it can be, while
all unanimously feel it should not be. Even those that feel it can be do not have a method
of costing it.
Job security has two parts to it. One is what it costs the government to give job security.
The other is the value of the benefit the employee receives when he/she gets job security.
Due to job security, it is not possible for the government to engage in downsizing
programs. But on paper it is possible for the government to terminate the services of an
employee whom the government deems fit to be removed. But job security does cost the
government in terms of loss of productivity which can happen if the employee feels that
his/her lack of productivity cannot be penalized. But such a hypothesis cannot be
generalized; such a thought if ever present in the minds of some of the employees is
probably the result of lack of adequate systems to penalize employees or lack of
autonomy that should be delegated at appropriate levels.
Job security makes it difficult for the organization to expand or reduce its size of human
resource. May be it is possible to monetize it if we look at what benefit the employee
receives due to job security. If a person has no job security, he/she will have to save an
extra amount so that he can continue with his life style while searching for a job. This
would mean that at least 30-50% of his basic pay + dearness pay + dearness allowance
should be saved if he wants to brace himself for an unexpected downsizing event. This
gets worse if he/she is a Class C or D employee. Yet another way to price job security is
the amount he/she will spend in updating his/her skills so as to be employable. The exact
amount will not be easy to calculate. But looking at the private sector, where every
XLRI Jamshedpur
98
Estimating cost to government
employee is spending a few thousands of rupees to upgrade his knowledge and skills, the
figure in this case may not be very different from the earlier one.
Job security is more important for the C & D categories than B & A, as the latter are
more “employable” in a growing economy. For a typical employee in groups C & D,
government service even without the job security is much more beneficial in the light of
the benefits he is entitled to. Job security puts him/her in a secure position to take care of
the family without the worry about losing job. Even if someone gives a 100 percent raise
one may not leave a government job. Conservatively we can stick to the 50% difference
in pay to the nearest private sector job.
For an employee in Groups B & A, however, there is the option to leave the government
service if one gets a good offer. Examples of such exit are numerous. But how much rise
would one leave for is debatable. It is generally assumed that a rise of 20% in CTC, one
would be considering leaving the organization in the private sector, if other factors also
contribute to the decision. In respect of public servants, one would leave if at the least a
40% to 50% increase is given which comes close to the difference we calculated for the C
& D employees.
Thus employment security probably explains the difference in salary with the nearest
comparable private sector, though pricing it that way is still putting too small a price on
job security. As such, any quantification will only serve to underestimate the advantage
that job security offers.
The cost of easy exit however is to do with the government policy of making the
employee eligible for pension if and only if the employee has spent a minimum of 20
years in service. This can be changed if the government makes it the responsibility of the
employee to take care of his/her pension thus not putting any constraints on the employee
to remain in service.
Apart from employment security, the status of a government employee in the society
(social status) is also a powerful intangible benefit. The impact of a government job on
status is highlighted especially in the lower levels. At the higher level, members of civil
services carry a lot of “perceived power” which enhances the status one enjoys in the
society.
XLRI Jamshedpur
99
Estimating cost to government
Generally government servants enjoy a better work-life balance than the private sector
though this may not be true for a considerable section of railway employees or the armed
forces. Speaking of the Armed forces, not only are they a very respected employee group
they also have a challenging job that is probably unparalleled in any other sector.
XLRI Jamshedpur
100
Estimating cost to government
14 Employees’ Perceptions of pay
As part of the study, we gathered data on employee perception about their job, pay and
benefit, and how in their opinion their job compares with similar jobs in private sector.
We developed separate questionnaires for different establishments under government
service. While most of the items in the questionnaires were common, we had several
unique items as well. Thus we had an 85 item questionnaire for the Defence sector, while
CISF and Railways had a 79 item questionnaire. Postal department was administered a
74 item questionnaire. These items in the questionnaires were to be responded on a 7
point scale, the first three indicating different degrees of agreement, while the next three
indicating different degrees of disagreement. In case of lack of awareness on a particular
item, the respondents were to choose ‘don’t know’ as the alternative.
Broadly the questionnaire captured the following: Overall Satisfaction with the Job,
Satisfaction with Pay and Benefits, Perception about being a government servant,
Opportunities for recognition, promotion, and career growth, Importance of Job Security
vis-à-vis lower salary, Comparison with private sector in terms of pay and benefits, and
perception about specific areas such as Pension plans, Cash conversion of non-monetary
benefits, Leave benefits, Medical benefits, etc. We have included in this analysis the data
received from about 1350 respondents across Defence, Railways, Central Para-military
forces, and Postal establishment.
In the following sections, we present the overall findings, followed by sector specific
survey results.. In these analyses, we have combined the varying degrees of agreement
and disagreement into agreement and disagreement respectively.
XLRI Jamshedpur
101
Estimating cost to government
Employee Perception Survey: Summary
The summary of the findings is given below under various heads. Notable variations
across the sectors are highlighted.
Overall Results
If we were to look at the overall results, it is obvious that there is a sense of overall
satisfaction with the job that respondents in the survey express. It is also apparent that
they are by and large unhappy about the specifics of pay and benefits they receive. The
other areas of concern were the lack of career growth opportunity and recognition for the
good work that they do. In essence, there is a crying need for revamping the performance
management systems that is followed in the government system. On the intangible front it
is very important for the policy makers to realize that issues such as job security, pension,
etc., are considered a huge benefit by the respondents. Most of them felt a high paying
job cannot compensate for the security they get in the government service. There was
also an even distribution in the opinion that to a large extent the less salary in government
sector is compensated by the leave benefits. Though many of them would be happy to see
the cash equivalent of non-monetary benefits, aspects such as leave rules, etc, are very
important in giving the government service a distinct character of its own. By and large
we found the respondents supporting the case for a flexible exit policy and they also felt
that individual employees could be given a say in planning their pension plan.
Overall Satisfaction
The Overall Satisfaction of the respondents with their job was very high across sectors.
Relatively speaking we found the respondents from the armed forces displayed a
somewhat lower level of satisfaction when compared to their counterparts in the other
sectors.
Satisfaction with Pay and Benefits
Most of the specific dimension that dealt with the satisfaction with pay and benefits
received poor results. This indicates that while overall the respondents are satisfied with
their job they are dissatisfied with the pay and benefits. Across the sectors the pattern
XLRI Jamshedpur
102
Estimating cost to government
was consistent. The respondents from the Railways were slightly less dissatisfied in this
regard.
Perception about being a government servant
Majority of the respondents felt a sense of pride in being a government servant. However
they did not feel that this pride compensate for lack of adequate pay and benefits. It was
also important to recognize the fact that not so favorable response emerged in terms of
their opinion on how the society looks at the government servants. It was interesting,
however, to note that Railways did show a slightly different picture on this count and felt
that to an extent the pride compensate for the lack of pay and benefits.
Opportunities for recognition, promotion, and career growth
Lack of opportunities for recognition emerged as another area of concern for the
government employees as per the survey results. Once again this was felt consistently
across sectors. This included lack of promotional and career development opportunities.
While the response may not be lopsided in terms of lack of opportunities, the results
clearly indicated that there is no guarantee in the sector for an employee to get promoted
purely on the basis of his or her performance. Consistently, the weakness in the
Performance Appraisal process was getting highlighted. The CPMF respondents were
comparatively more dissatisfied on this count.
Importance of Job Security vis-à-vis lower salary
By and large the respondents gave a positive picture about the job security element in the
government sector. From the response it was also evident that even though the salary
may be less when compared to the private sector, the job security is certainly a driving
force behind the employees continuing service in the sector.
Pension plans, Cash conversion of benefits, Leave & Medical benefits, etc.
The respondents felt that the nature of present pension plans encourages employees to
stay on just to avail of the pension benefits. And they felt some sort of flexibility needs
to be brought in to address the situation. To a lesser extent the respondents also felt that
employees should be allowed a say in their pension plan. Medical benefit, quite
XLRI Jamshedpur
103
Estimating cost to government
unexpectedly drew some flak and the respondents were not satisfied with their medical
benefits in the government service. Leave travel facilities were by and large seen in a
positive light. Not surprisingly, employees felt that most of the non-monetary benefits
could be converted to cash components.
Comparison with private sector in terms of pay and benefits
While the job security factor certainly made the government sector job more attractive
than private sector, in terms of actual pay and benefits, the government sector was pitted
against the private sector in a very unfavorable light by the respondents.
Results of Employee Perception Survey: Overall Trends
The overall satisfaction of government employees was very high. However, majority of
the respondents across sectors showed a clear lack of satisfaction with pay and benefits.
For instance to the item ‘I like my present job very much’ as many as 89% agreed while
only 11% disagreed. Similarly for the item ‘I am overall very satisfied with my job’ while
68% agreed only 31% disagreed. However, a somewhat different picture emerged when
probed on pay and benefit of their job. As many as 60% agreed to the item ‘There are no
rewards for those who work here’ while only 37% disagreed. For the item, the amount of
pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be only 29% agreed while
69% disagreed.
Further, 63% agreed to the item ‘I feel un-appreciated by the organization when I think
about what they pay me’ and only 32% disagreed. For the item ‘I feel I am being paid a
fair amount for the work I do’ 46% agree while 53% disagreed. On similar line, to the
item ‘I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be’ while 67% agreed 30%
disagreed. Quite expectedly 67% agreed to the statement ‘I am not satisfied with the
benefits I receive’ while 32% disagreed.
Similarly, while majority of the respondents laid emphasis on the pride associated with
working in the government sector that substantially dropped when asked whether this
pride compensates for the relatively lower salary that they receive. To the item, ‘the
pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me’ as high as 83%
XLRI Jamshedpur
104
Estimating cost to government
agreed while 15% disagreed. 75% agreed that ‘being a Government Servant saves me
from compromising on my values and ethics’ and a whopping 90% agreed that ‘by being
a government employee I am serving the country’.
However such positive feelings substantially dropped when quizzed on equating this
pride with benefits. For instance, to the item ‘the joy of associating with the government
is a significant non-monetary benefit to me’ only 56% agreed while 37% disagreed.
Similarly only 45% agreed to the item ‘the pride of being a government servant is more
important than the pay and monetary benefits’ while 53% disagreed. Further 59% agreed
to the statement ‘the pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay
(compared to the private sector) to some extent’ while 35% disagreed. About 54%
agreed to the statement ‘ I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as
the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself’ while 44% disagreed.
Finally an area of concern is the perception that ‘the society looks down upon the
government servants’ was supported by 46% while 50% disagreed with that. Another
area of concern was the largely negative perception that the employees shared in terms of
the policy and practices regarding recognition of talent, promotional avenues, or career
development opportunities. For instance, to the item ‘when I do a good job, I receive the
recognition for it that I should receive’ only 51% agreed while 47% disagreed. A
disturbing response the disagreement of 64% of the respondents to the item ‘those who
do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted in my organization’ while only
35% agreed. Quite on similar line, as a high as 77% felt that ‘there is too little chance for
promotion on my job’. While there was an even distribution with 48% responding in
affirmative to the statement ‘the present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my
talents’ and 51% disagreeing; only 33% agreed to the item ‘The opportunity for career
growth is adequate in my organization’ and 66% disagreed.
The weakness of Performance evaluation system was evident from the response to ‘the
Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their
developmental plans’ with 45% agreeing and 49% disagreeing. Similarly only 39%
agreed to the item ‘my organization encourages employees to plan for their career
XLRI Jamshedpur
105
Estimating cost to government
growth’ while 59% disagreed. While the exact implication of this statement may be open
to debate, 47% of the respondents agreed to the item ‘my job as a government servant
provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests’ while 52%
disagreed.
Regarding the pay structure, an overwhelming majority (95%) opined that ‘there is a
pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee
efficiency.’ Only 38% agreed to the item ‘the pay structure presently prevailing in
government ensures efficiency.’ Similarly, to the item, the pay structure presently
prevailing in government ensures employee satisfaction’ only 37% agreed while 62%
disagreed.
Regarding the existing pension plans, a majority of the respondents felt that current
scheme forces the employees to stay on in the service just to avail the pension benefits.
They also felt that it should be made flexible, and something like a 5 year minimum cut-
off should be adequate with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount. For the item
‘the 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service
with the sole objective of getting pension’ a whopping 80% agreed while only 17%
disagreed. Similarly, to the item ‘it is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying
service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the
pension amount’ while 57% agreed 38% disagreed. In terms of flexibility in exit policy,
77% agreed to the statement, ‘a reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension
will go a long way in evolving a flexible exit policy for the government servants’ While
not equally unequivocal, about 53% endorsed the view that ‘Government should let
employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will’ and only 43%
disagreed.
Similarly, cutting across sectors, the respondents were of the opinion that many non-
monetary benefits could be converted to cash components and that some discretion
should be allowed to the employees in deciding their pay mix. For the item ‘pay in the
government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as
employees can allocate their resources wisely found agreement from 57% of the
XLRI Jamshedpur
106
Estimating cost to government
respondents while 41% disagreed. Indicating their preference for cash, 67% agreed to the
statement ‘I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving
me various benefits’ while 27% disagreed. Further, 68% agreed to the statement ‘I think
the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-
monetary benefits that the government employees get’ and only 26% disagreed. On the
same line, 77% agreed to the item ‘I feel that the cash component in the pay packet
should be must more than turn non-monetary benefits’. Similarly 56% agreed to the item
‘I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix at the beginning of every year’
while 32% disagreed. The item ‘I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on
cash aspects and less on retirement, benefits because employees can plan and fund their
own retirement’ found endorsement from 46% while 51% disagreed with it.
To the item ‘employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as
against the non-monetary benefits’ about 76% agreed while 18% disagreed. However, to
the statement ‘by giving more cash to the employees, government can do away with the
pension plan & let employee plan their pension’ only 43% agreed while 53% disagreed.
An overwhelming majority of the respondents felt that job security was important and
that they were continuing in spite of the lower salary, because of the job security. For
instance to the statement, ‘a secure job is more important to me than a high paying job’
while 73% agreed only 27% disagreed. Equally overwhelmingly positive was the
response to the item ‘even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the
job security that make me continue here’ where 85% agreed while 15% disagreed. In the
same line, 86% agreed to the item ‘I am happy working with the government sector as it
gives me a secure job’ while 14% disagreed. .
Regarding the specific facilities, the majority of the respondents felt that medical
facilities were not very attractive and that it compared unfavorably with the private
sector. There was mixed response to the Leave Travel Concession available. To the item
‘the medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organization’ only
39% agreed while 59% disagreed. Similarly to the item ‘medical benefits and allowances
in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector’ only 33% agreed while
XLRI Jamshedpur
107
Estimating cost to government
63% disagreed. In the same line, 65% agreed to the statement that medical benefits in my
organization are inadequate to meet the needs of the employees’ while 35% disagreed.
While they are satisfied with the leave benefits, they do not think that it is in excess.
However they are open to the idea of curtailing the leave benefit in lieu of monetary
component. For instance, to the item ‘the quantum of various types of leave can be
curtailed by compensating with cash’ 70% agreed while 29% disagreed. Only 31%
agreed to the item ‘I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than
necessary’ while 67% disagreed. Nevertheless a substantial 61% agreed to the item ‘I am
satisfied that, as a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays’
The response regarding Leave travel allowance was mixed. To the item, ‘the leave travel
allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to’ while 51% agree, 45%
disagreed. Similarly to the item, ‘almost everyone in the government sector avails his/her
LTA facility’ 59% agreed while 34% disagreed.
While an overwhelming majority felt that government accommodation was indeed a
significant benefit, they felt that it is difficult to get one, in spite of their entitlement.
They also felt that the House Rent Allowance is grossly inadequate to meet their
requirement. To the item ‘Government granted accommodation is a great benefit’ 78%
agreed while 21% disagreed. For the item ‘though I am entitled, I do not have
government accommodation’ 57% agreed while 39% disagreed. Further for a related
item ‘the HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure’ a
whopping 78% agreed while 21% disagreed.
When the respondents were asked to compare the pay and benefit they receive with that
of the private sector an overwhelming majority felt that the private sector employees
were getting a better package and it cannot be compared. However, majority felt that it
would not be difficult for them to land in a suitable job in the private sector if they
desired. For instance to the item ‘looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay
is less in Government service compared to the private sector’ while 92% agreed 8%
disagreed. Even to the item ‘if one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits
of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector’ agreement was only 22% while
XLRI Jamshedpur
108
Estimating cost to government
70% disagreed. On the same line majority of the respondents disagreed (72%) to the
item ‘I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government
Service is comparable to the private sector’. To the item ‘the relatively lesser salary we
get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e. EL, CL & SL,
as compared to the private sector’ 45% agreed while 52% disagreed.
When probed individual specific reasons, 44% agreed to the item, ‘a 10.00 AM to 5.00
PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than
opting for a private sector job’ while 52% disagreed.
Majority of the respondents were confident as reflected in the 64% agreement received to
the statement ‘with my qualifications, finding and attractive job in private sector will not
be difficult’. However 51% agreed that ‘private sector recruiters have an aversion to
recruit from government sector’ Majority (58%) also felt ‘longer service in government
sector makes one less attractive to private sector recruiters’
Results of Employee Perception Survey: CPMF
From the data it is observed that an overwhelming majority of the CPMF employees who
responded to the survey are satisfied with their job. The respondents felt that they liked
their present job very much (89% agreed vs 10% disagreed), their overall satisfaction is
very high (71% satisfied vs 25% not satisfied), and that their job is interesting to be fully
engaging in (66% agreed vs 29% disagreed)
However, when it came to satisfaction with Pay and benefit, it reflected a different
picture. While 72% agreed that they are not satisfied with the benefit they receive, only
26% disagreed. Similarly more than 70% felt that their efforts are not rewarded the way it
should be. Almost 66% felt that the pay they receive makes them feel unappreciated.
About 70% of the respondents felt that the existing pay structure is not conducive to
ensuring efficiency or to ensuring employee satisfaction. And thus an overwhelming
XLRI Jamshedpur
109
Estimating cost to government
majority (92%) felt that there is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay
structure to improve employee efficiency.
Majority of the respondents (68%) felt that the medical benefits are inadequate. However
for another question on medical benefits only 50% of the respondents felt that the
medical benefits and allowances are not attractive. Similarly only 37% of the respondents
felt that medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in
the private sector.
It was observed from the survey results that the employees displayed an extremely
positive disposition towards being a government servant. Whether it is the pride
associated with being a government servant (80%), or the fact that by being a government
servant they are serving the country, or the opportunity to uphold the values and ethics
(76%). However, some of the less positive aspects were also noted. For instance when
asked whether the pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay
and benefits, only 58% agreed. Similarly, almost 50% of the respondents agreed that the
society looks down upon the government servants. Further, when asked whether the joy
of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit, only 59%
agreed.
There was an overall negative perception among the respondents regarding recognition or
promotion opportunities or career development avenues.
As many as 86% respondents agreed that there is too little chance for promotion. Only
38% agreed to the statement that those who do well on the job sand a fair chance of being
promoted. Organizations support for developmental plans (53% agreed) or for career
growth (47%) reflected mixed response. About 49% felt that their job gave them
opportunities to use their talents.
There was a general support for reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension,
as well as allowing employees more say in planning their own pension plan. For instance,
as many as 78% agreed for a reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension.
XLRI Jamshedpur
110
Estimating cost to government
Similarly, 80% agreed that the 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that
many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension. Sixty four percent
agreed that Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit
at their will.
Majority of the respondents felt that non-monetary benefits could be converted to cash
component and that employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash
components. For instance more than 70% of the respondents felt that all the benefits
currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay. Similarly
more than 80% felt that employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash
component as against the non-monetary benefits. About 60% felt that more focus should
be on cash aspects, and less on retirement benefits. About 65% of respondents felt that
they should be given the option to decide on the pay mix.
Majority of the respondents gave importance to a secure job and were happy that they, as
government employees, had a secure job. For instance, 83% felt that it is the job security
that makes them continue in the government job as opposed to the private sector job.
About 70% felt that it is more important to have a secure job than a high paying job.
While almost 72% of the respondents mentioned that almost everyone in the government
sector uses his/her LTA facility, only 53% felt that the leave travel allowance is one of
the most attractive benefits they are entitled to.
While most of the respondents (81%) felt that government granted accommodation is a
great benefit to employees, most of them do not get the benefits of this (76%). Similarly
65% of the respondents felt that the HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my
accommodation expenditure. 76% of the employees felt that as CPMF employees they
hardly get any benefits from the government’s HRA policy
The comparison between government job and private sector job gave mixed results.
While on the monetary aspects it fared much lower than private sector job, the
government job compensated by status, prestige, etc.,
XLRI Jamshedpur
111
Estimating cost to government
For instance while 40% felt that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay
package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector, only 34% agreed that
if one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the
pay in the private sector. However, to the question that keeping in mind the intangible
benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy, we are
better off than comparable employees of private sector about 68% respondents answered
in the affirmative.
To a related question, 61% agreed that longer service in government sector is seen as a
liability by private sector recruiters. Similarly 54% felt that private sector recruiters have
an aversion to recruit from government sector. However, when it came to individual
related questions about their ability to find attractive jobs in private sector, majority of
the respondents felt that it was not a difficult thing.
The leave entitlements were positively viewed by majority of the respondents. However
they also felt that leave entitlement could be curtailed by compensating with cash. 58% of
the respondents felt that ‘the relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large
extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e., EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private
sector’. However, only 36% agreed that I feel that the government servants enjoy more
paid leave than necessary. Similarly only 49% are satisfied that, as a government
servant, they enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays
About 70% of the respondents felt that various departments/services in Government have
too many allowances and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization.
Similarly, about 78% felt that many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job
difficult.
Majority of the respondents also felt that government does not compensate for the
hardship they undergo due to postings in difficult areas or for the separation from family
due to certain type of posting
XLRI Jamshedpur
112
Estimating cost to government
Results of Employee Perception Survey: Defence Sector
The overall satisfaction of government employees was very high. However, majority of
the respondents across sectors showed a clear lack of satisfaction with pay and benefits.
For instance to the item ‘I like my present job very much’ 79% agreed while only 21%
disagreed. However, to the item ‘I am overall very satisfied with my job’ this
endorsement dropped to 54% while 46% disagreed. On the positive side, however, as
high as 79% disagreed with the statement ‘I feel my job is meaningless.’ Continuing the
trend, 61% agreed to the statement ‘my job is pretty interesting to full engage myself in’
However, what was disturbing was the disagreement of 53% of respondents to the item ‘I
would prefer that my son/daughter joins the armed forces’ and only 34% agreed with this
statement.
When it came to satisfaction with Pay and benefit, it reflected a different picture. For
instance, to the item ‘I feel I am being paid a fair amount of work I do’ only 23% agreed
while 77% disagreed. In line with this trend, the statement ‘there are no rewards for those
who work here’ received endorsement from 64% and the statement ‘I am not satisfied
with the benefits I receive’ received endorsement from 79%. Further, for the statement
‘the amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be’ there
was only 14% endorsement while 84% disagreed. Similarly, 73% agreed to the item ‘I
don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be’
The opinion on medical benefits presented a mixed picture. While 55% agreed to the
statement ‘Medical benefits in my organization is inadequate to meet the needs of the
employees’ only 44% disagree. Similarly only 40% agreed to the statement that ‘the
medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organization’ while 58%
disagreed. Quite expectedly only 39% agreed to the statement ‘medical benefits and
allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector’ while 57%
disagreed.
XLRI Jamshedpur
113
Estimating cost to government
While Defence respondents largely took pride in being a government servant, they were
less enthusiastic in equating this pride with pay and benefit. For instance 80% agreed to
the item ‘the pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me.’
Similarly 87% agreed to the statement ‘by being a government employee I am serving the
country’ while only 11% disagreed.
However to the item ‘I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as
the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself’ only 38% agreed while 62% disagreed.
Similarly only 36% agreed to the item ‘the pride of association with the government does
offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent’ while 61%
disagreed. Continuing with this trend, 48% disagreed to the item ‘the joy of associating
with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit’ while 45% agreed.
Similarly, only 33% agreed to the item ‘the pride of being a government servant is more
important than the pay and monetary benefits’ while 66% disagreed. ‘Being a
Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethic’ was a greed
to 59% of the respondents, while 58% agreed to the statement ‘ the society looks down
upon the government servants’ while 39% disagreed.
Reflecting the trend across different sectors, Defence personnel also felt that recognition,
promotion, and career development aspects were aspects that needed to be improved
substantially.
Only 41% felt that ‘those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted in
my organization’ while 58% disagreed. Only 39% agreed to the item ‘the Annual
Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their
developmental plans’ while 51% disagreed.
Majority (53%) disagreed to the statement that ‘when I do a good job, I receive the
recognition for it that I should receive’ while 75% agreed with the statement ‘I feel un-
appreciated by the organization when I think about what they pay me.’
XLRI Jamshedpur
114
Estimating cost to government
Only 39% agreed that ‘the present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my
talents’ while 60% disagreed with it. While 64% disagreed on ‘my organization
encourages employees to plan for their career growth’, 75% agreed that ‘there is too little
chance for promotion on my job’. To the item ‘the opportunity for career growth is
adequate in my organization’ 69% disagreed.
By and large the respondents were in agreement with having flexibility in pension plans,
or to giving more say to employees in devising their own pension plans.
For instance 78% felt that ‘the 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that
many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension’ while 57% agreed ‘it is
necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension
-with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount.’ For another item ‘a reduction in
the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a flexible exit
policy for the government servants’ a whopping 77% agreed while only 11% disagreed.
Slightly equivocal were the response to the item ‘by giving more cash to the employees,
government can do away with the pension plan & let employees plan their pension’
where 43% agreed, while 54% disagreed. Similarly, 56% agreed to the item
‘Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their
will’ while 39% disagreed.
Majority of the respondents were in favour of converting non-monetary benefits to cash.
For instance 51% agreed to ‘I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash
instead of giving me various benefits’ while only 27% disagreed. Similarly 63% agreed
‘I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as
part of pay’ and higher percentage of 73% agreed to the item ‘employees should be
allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits.’
On similar line, 67% agreed that ‘I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix at
the beginning of every year’ while 21% disagreed.
XLRI Jamshedpur
115
Estimating cost to government
For another item ‘I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too
low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get’ 69%
agreed.
For the item ‘I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects and
less on retirement, benefits because employees can plan and fund their own retirement
benefits’ 53% agreed while 44% disagreed. Similarly to the item ‘I would prefer if the
government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits’ 70%
agreed, while 68% agreed to the statement ‘the quantum of various types of leave can be
curtailed by compensating with cash’
Majority of the respondents considered job security as important. For instance 62%
agreed to the statement ‘A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job’
while 78% agreed to the item ‘I am happy working with the government sector as it gives
me a secure job’ Quite significantly 76% of the respondents from Defence sector
answered in the affirmative to the item ‘even if my job is not as high paying as a private
sector job, it is the job security that make me continue here’
There was mixed results regarding Leave Travel Allowance. While 51% agreed to the
item ‘almost everyone in the government sector avails his/her LTA facility’ only 46%
agreed to ‘the leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled
to’
While 77% agreed that ‘Government granted accommodation is a great benefit’ 72% said
‘though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation.’ Similarly 68% opined
that ‘Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled’ while 76% felt
‘the HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure’
Once again reflecting the overall trend, the respondents felt that the pay and benefits in
government service do not compare favorably with that in private sector. For instance
only 13% agreed to ‘I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package
in Government Service is comparable to the private sector’. Similarly a whopping 95%
XLRI Jamshedpur
116
Estimating cost to government
agreed to the statement ‘looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less
in Government service compared to the private sector’ and only 13% agreed to the item
‘if one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals
the pay in the private sector’
59% also felt that ‘longer service in government sector makes one less attractive to
private sector’
Reflecting a good amount of self-confident 73% felt that ‘it is not difficult for me to find
a more challenging job in the private sector’ and 77% agreed to the item ‘With my
qualifications, finding and attractive job in private sector will not be difficult’. However a
majority (55%) also felt that ‘private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from
government sector’
Continuing the same trend, only 33% agreed that ‘the relatively lesser salary we get in
Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e. EL, CL & SL, as
compared to the private sector’ and a similar percentage agreed with ‘keeping in mind the
intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy,
we are better off than comparable employees of private sector’
There was satisfaction with leave entitlement. While 58% agreed that ‘I am satisfied that,
a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays’ only 35% agreed to
the item ‘I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary’
Canteen & Ration facilities are unique to the Defence sector. We started with the item
‘armed forces are beneficiaries of a number of allowances that civilian employees do not
receive’ to which 47% agreed while only 43% disagreed
Similarly only 45% agreed to ‘an employee of the armed forces saves a considerable
amount of money by availing of the canteen services’ while 46% disagreed. Continuing
with this trend, only 31% agreed that ‘the rations that I receive as an armed force
employee is a substantial benefit to me’ while 40% disagreed.
XLRI Jamshedpur
117
Estimating cost to government
Interestingly, to the item ‘government should increase cash component instead of giving
us the canteen benefit’ 55% agreed, while 59% agreed that ‘armed forces canteen
services is a very significant benefit provided by the government’ while 36% disagreed
Only 38% agreed that ‘armed forces are in receipt of a number of travel concessions that
serve their needs’ while 42% disagreed.
Importantly only 17% agreed that ‘the pay package compensates for my absence from my
family for most part of work life’ while 66% disagreed. Similarly only 26% agreed to
‘the hardship allowance I receive when posted in difficult areas serves its purpose’ while
54% disagreed. This has to be seen in context as 63% agreed that ‘I am separated from
my family for most part of the year due to the nature of my job’
There was an agreement that the pay structure needs revision to ensures employee
satisfaction. To the item ‘there is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay
structure to improve employee efficiency’ 97% agreed. To the item ‘the pay structure
presently prevailing in government is not conductive to efficiently’ 82% agreed.
Similarly only 28% agreed to the item ‘the pay structure presently prevailing in
government ensures efficiency’ while 70% disagreed.
XLRI Jamshedpur
118
Estimating cost to government
Results of Employee Perception Survey: Railways
The overall satisfaction of Railway employees was pretty high. For instance to the item
‘I like my present job very much’ 93% responded in the affirmative, while the item ‘I am
overall very satisfied with my job’ attracted endorsement from 75%. While 79%
responded positively to the item ‘the job is pretty interesting to fully engage myself in’
only 7% agreed to the item ‘I feel my job is meaningless’
As in the case of other sectors the respondents were less positive on the pay and benefits.
For instance, 64% agreed to ‘I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be’
47% agreed to ‘I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive’. Similarly, 60% agreed to
the item ‘there are no rewards for those who work here’
Surprisingly, however, 70% agreed to the statement ‘I feel I am being paid a fair amount
for the work I do’ and only 46% agreed to the item ‘I feel un-appreciated by the
organization when I think about what they pay me’. Further 40% agreed to ‘the amount
of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be’ while 60%
disagreed.
The perception on medical benefits was largely reflective of the overall picture. For
instance, 67% agreed that ‘medical benefits in my organization is inadequate to meet the
needs of the employees’ and only 32% agreed to the item ‘The medical benefits and
allowances are certainly attractive in my organization’ while 77% disagreed to the
statement ‘medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than
in the private sector’
Majority of the respondents took pride in the fact that they are government servants. For
instance, 95% agreed that ‘by being a government employee I am serving the country’
while 86% agreed that ‘the pride I derive by being a government servant is very
important to me’. It was interesting to observe that while 73% agreed that ‘The pride of
association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private
XLRI Jamshedpur
119
Estimating cost to government
sector) to some extent’ only 44% agreed to the statement ‘The pride of being a
government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits’
In the same line, 52% agreed that ‘I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government
Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself’ while 60% agreed that ‘the
joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me’
Keeping in line with other sectors, here also it was observed that 83% agreed that ‘being
a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics.’
However, once again it was observed that 43% felt ‘the society looks down upon the
government servants’
Only 40% agreed to the item ‘my organization encourages employees to plan for their
career growth’ while 59% disagreed. Similarly only 38% agreed to the item ‘the Annual
Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their
developmental plans’ while 60% disagreed.
Only 28% agreed to the statement that ‘the opportunity for career growth is adequate in
my organization’ while 72% disagreed. While 51% agreed that ‘the present job gives me
enough opportunities to utilize my talents’ a large majority (68%) felt that ‘there is too
little chance for promotion on my job’.
Only 25% agreed that ‘those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being
promoted’ while 75% disagreed.. Again, only 53% agreed that ‘ when I do a good job,
I receive the recognition for it that I should receive’ while 47% disagreed.
Largely, there was agreement to having flexibility in pension plans. 78% agreed to ‘the
20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with
the sole objective of getting pension’ while 55 % agreed to the statement that ‘it is
necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension
-with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount’ . Similarly 77% agreed that ‘a
reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving
a more flexible exit policy for the government servants’ while 50% endorsed
XLRI Jamshedpur
120
Estimating cost to government
‘Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their
will’
Majority of the respondents from Railways chose to support introduction of more cash
components in lieu of the non-monetary benefits. For instance, 72% agreed to the
statement ‘employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as
against the non-monetary benefits’ while 64% agreed to the statement ‘I feel that all the
benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay’
However, to the item ‘I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash
aspects, and leave the retirement benefits planning to the individual employees’ only 40%
agreed while 59% disagreed.
72% agreed to ‘I feel that the cash component in the pay packet should be much more
than the non-monetary benefits’ while only 33% agreed to ‘I should be given the option
to decide on the pay mix at the beginning of every year’
While 64% agreed to ‘I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is
too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get’
about 68% agreed to ‘I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead
of giving me various benefits’
Interestingly only 30% agreed to the statement ‘by giving more cash to the employees
government can do away with a pension plan and let employees plan their pension’ while
a large number (68%) disagreed to this. Further, 68% felt that ‘the quantum of various
types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash’
In tune with the rest of the sectors, 76% mentioned ‘a secure job is more important to me
than a high paying job’ while a whopping 88% agreed that ‘even if my job is not as high
paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that makes me continue here’.
Consequently, 90% felt that ‘I am happy working with the government sector as it gives
me a secure job.
XLRI Jamshedpur
121
Estimating cost to government
Reflecting the same trend only 47% agreed that ‘almost everyone in the government
sector uses his/her LTA facility.’ Similarly only 41% agreed that the leave travel
allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to’
While71% felt that Government granted accommodation is a great benefit, unlike in other
sectors only 38% said that ‘hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are
entitled’. However, 83% agreed that ‘the HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my
accommodation expenditure’ while 42% agreed ‘though I am entitled, I do not have
government accommodation’
As with the overall trends, Railway employees also felt that they do not compare
favorably with the private sector employees. For instance, only 27% agreed that ‘I feel
that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is
comparable to the private sector’ while 73% disagreed. Even for the statement ‘if one
puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay
in the private sector’ only 16% agreed while 78% disagreed. Similarly 89% agreed to
‘Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service
compared to the private sector’
However, to the statement, ‘the intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that
we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private
sector’ about 46% agreed while 54% disagreed.
While 59% agreed that ‘longer service in government sector is seen as a liability by
private sector recruiters’ 53% agreed that ‘it is not difficult for me to land a better paying
job in the private sector if I so desire’
While 46% agreed that ‘private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from
government sector’ 51% agreed that ‘with my qualifications, finding an attractive job in
private sector will not be difficult’
XLRI Jamshedpur
122
Estimating cost to government
While 59% of the respondents have endorsed the item ‘I am satisfied that, as a
government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays’ only 29% agreed to’ I
feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary’ while 69%
disagreed
Specific questions were asked about the facility of Railway Passes. An overwhelming
majority (79%) disagreed with the statement ‘I believe that railways employees have too
many allowances’
While 85% agreed to the statement ‘I feel that railway passes given to us is a significant
benefit’ 70% felt that ‘I feel that employees use the railway passes facility at the most
50% o f their entitlement’
97% of the respondents agreed to the item ‘there is a pressing need to review and
rationalize the pay structure to improve employee. Only 38% agreed to the item ‘the pay
structure presently prevailing in government ensures efficiency’ while 48% agreed to ‘the
pay structure presently prevailing in government ensures employee satisfaction’
XLRI Jamshedpur
123
Estimating cost to government
Results of Employee Perception Survey: Postal Department
Like their counterparts in the other sectors, the respondents from the postal sector also
expressed positive feelings towards their job. . For instance 95% agreed that ‘I like my
present job very much’ and 74% endorsed that ‘I am overall very satisfied with my job’.
Only 10% agreed to ‘I feel my job is meaningless, while 84% agreed that ‘The job is
pretty interesting to fully engage myself in’
However the respondents were largely disappointed with their pay and benefits. For
instance 70% responded by endorsing the item ‘I am not satisfied with the benefits I
receive.’ Similarly 59% agreed to the item ‘I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way
they should be’. Further only 45% agreed to ‘I feel I am being paid a fair amount for the
work I do’ while 32% agreed to ‘The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to
what I think it should be.’ Similarly 60% felt that ‘there are no rewards for those who
work here’.
There was overall a negative perception towards the medical benefit. While 69% felt
agreed to the item ‘medical benefits in my organization is inadequate to meet the needs of
the employees’ only 35% agreed to the statement ‘medical benefits and allowances in
government sector is more attractive than in the private sector’.
By and large the respondents held positive attitude towards being a government servant.
For instance, 92% felt that ‘by being a government employee I am serving the country’
while 87% agreed to the item ‘the pride I derive by being a government servant is very
important to me’
However, unlike some of the other sectors, majority (61%) of the respondents endorsed
the statement ‘I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of
serving the nation is a reward in itself’ and 61% agreed that ‘the joy of associating with
the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me’
XLRI Jamshedpur
124
Estimating cost to government
While 80% agreed that ‘being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on
my values and ethics’ 62% disagreed to the statement that ‘the society looks down upon
the government servants.’ Both these results are away from the trend seen in other sectors
The results regarding recognition, promotion, and career development, reflected the trend
in other sectors. For instance 64% agreed to the item ‘I feel un-appreciated by the
organization when I think about what they pay me’ while only 36% agreed to ‘my
organization encourages employees to plan for their career growth’. 78% agreed with the
statement ‘there is too little chance for promotion on my job’ while only 37% agreed with
‘those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted ‘.
Similarly 52% endorsed the statement ‘The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in
our organization help employees in their developmental plans’ while only 38%
supported the item ‘the opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization’.
While 45% agreed to the item ‘when I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I
should receive’ 55% disagreed with it.
As reflected in other sectors, the respondents displayed a preference for flexibility in the
pension plans. For instance, 76% endorsed the statement ‘the 20 years mandatory service
forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting
pension’ and similarly 75% endorsed the item ‘a reduction in the minimum qualifying
service for pension will go a long way in evolving a more flexible exit policy for the
government servants’
While 51% agreed that ‘it is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5
years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount’
51% disagreed with the item ‘by giving more cash to the employees government can do
away with a pension plan and let employees plan their pension’. Similarly 52%
disagreed with the item ‘Government should let employees plan their own pension so
that they can exit at their will’
XLRI Jamshedpur
125
Estimating cost to government
Majority of the respondents were in favour of introducing cash components in place of
non-monetary benefits. For instance, 78% said ‘employees should be allowed to choose
the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits’ while 68% endorsed
‘I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as
part of pay’
Similarly, while 36% agreed to ‘ I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on
cash aspects, and leave the retirement benefits planning to the individual employees’ as
high as 79% agreed to “I feel that the cash component in the pay packet should be much
more than the non-monetary benefits’
Further 59% endorsed the item ‘I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix at
the beginning of every year’ 70% agreed to ‘I would prefer if the government gives me
equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits’.
Similarly 70% responded positively to the statement ‘I think the cash component of the
pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the
government employees get’ while 52% endorsed the view that ‘Pay in the government
sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can
allocate their resources wisely.’ Interestingly it was noted that 81% felt that ‘the
quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash’
While 83% agreed that ‘a secure job is more important to me than a high paying job’ an
overwhelming 92% felt that ‘even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job,
it is the job security that makes me continue here’. Consequently 87% endorsed the view
that ‘I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job’.
While 68% agreed that ‘almost everyone in the government sector uses his/her LTA
facility’ another 65% agreed ‘the leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive
benefits we are entitled to’
XLRI Jamshedpur
126
Estimating cost to government
While 82% agreed that ‘Government accommodation is a great benefit’ 60% felt that
‘hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled’. Similarly while 60%
felt that ‘though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation’ 84% felt ‘the
HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure’
Once again majority of the respondents compared themselves unfavorably with their
counterparts in private sector when it came to pay and benefits. For instance, 75%
disagreed with the statement ‘I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay
package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector’ while only 26%
agreed to the statement ‘if one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of
pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector.’ Similarly an overwhelming
majority (93%) felt that ‘looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less
in Government service compared to the private sector‘
However, 70% agreed that ‘the intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that
we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private
sector’ Similarly 52% felt that ‘the relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a
large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e., EL, CL & SL, as compared to the
private sector’
While 50% agreed that ‘private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from
government sector’ 52% agreed that ‘longer service in government sector is seen as a
liability by private sector recruiters’. However 57% felt that ‘it is not difficult for me to
land a better paying job in the private sector if I so desire’ and 59% felt ‘it is not
difficult for me to find a more challenging job in the private sector’.
While 78% agreed endorsed the statement ‘I am satisfied that, as a government servant, I
enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays’ 75% disagreed with the item ‘I feel that the
government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary’
About 50% of the respondents agreed to the item ‘I feel that various departments/services
in Government have too many allowances and benefits of sundry nature, which call for
XLRI Jamshedpur
127
Estimating cost to government
standardization’ while 55% disagreed to the statement ‘the pay structure presently
prevailing in government ensures efficiency’. Similarly 62% disagreed that ‘the pay
structure presently prevailing in government ensures employee satisfaction.” An
overwhelming majority (96%) of the respondents felt that ‘there is a pressing need to
review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficacy’
XLRI Jamshedpur
128
Estimating cost to government
15 GOVERNMENT VS. PRIVATE SECTOR & PSUS
The team had carried out a survey amongst the private sector organizations to understand
the components of CTC in a more detailed manner. Specifically, the organizations were
asked for the components of CTC. They were also asked to list those components of
compensation that were not included in the CTC. Along with the CTC, the survey sought
to obtain pay levels in the organizations (number of bands in case the organization is
broad banded), the pay differentials between the pay levels and the pay range within each
level. Not many organizations were targeted for this survey. The focus was to get data
from those organizations that mirrored the government in terms of the number of years in
existence and drew their pay policies from government. The organizations selected for
the comparison were those that government employees would probably join in case they
wanted to leave the government. These organisations were somewhat similar to the
government in terms of working style, work life balance and job security. Though private
sector organizations do not offer employment security, some are known for their HRD
practices that are employee oriented, that a downsizing program would be the last on
their list.
These organizations numbering just 4 were also asked to share their views, on pricing job
security and work life balance. All of them felt that job security should not be priced nor
should work life balance. Their data is shared below. But the data with respect to pay
levels cannot be directly compared with the government as the rationale for number of
levels is organization dependent. Moreover, what they pay for each level also cannot be
compared. For such a comparison benchmark jobs in government should be identified
using compensable factors and later these jobs should be compared across the industry.
That is a huge operation that would take time, financial resources and finally may prove
to be not so successful in terms of the output and final outcome. The survey should be
seen only with respect to those items that can be compared viz. components of CTC, the
weight of basic pay and pay differentials across pay levels.
XLRI Jamshedpur
129
Estimating cost to government
15.1 Pay mix of a representative private sector organizations
The organization’s rank in the industry with respect to pay is given in the table below.
The pay differentials range from the standard 15 to 20% in the lower management level
to even 130% in the senior management level. Within these levels, the pay ranges from
60% to 130% from the midpoint in the range usually though one organization has a
slightly narrower range. The organizations add almost everything that we have added.
One of the organizations surveyed has a defined benefit pension.
Orgn 1 Org 2 Org 3 Org 4 Industry Construction conglomerate Fin. Mfg. pay rank in the industry top payer 75th %tile 50th %tile 50th %tile Pay levels 19 15 na NA Broadband if any 6 7 6 4 Pay differentials Lower 13% to 20% 25% to 30% 15% to 20% 30 Middle 13% to 20% 35% to 40% 15% to 20% 80 Senior 15% to 20% 35% to 40% 15% to 20% 65 pay range in each level 60 to 130% 65% to 120% 70 to 130% 10 to 80% components of CTC BASIC y y y Y Supplementary all y y Y postion pay n n n Y DA y y y N HRA y y y Y CCA y y y Y conveyance all y y y Y telephone all y y Education all y y LTC y y Y Performance linked Pay y y Car schemes for managers y n cars for managers y y computer schemes for Mgrs. y y Housing loan interest subsidy y y n PF y y y Y Gratuity y y y Y Pension n y N Medical (nominal value) y Furniture/AC Y LTC/holiday plan Y Esops n pricing Job Security can price but
should not be cannot be priced
Cannot be priced
XLRI Jamshedpur
130
Estimating cost to government
XLRI Jamshedpur
131
Estimating cost to government
15.2 Comparison with the public sector
Comparison with the pay in the PSU and the government is inevitable and may be the
first step in comparison with other employers; but apart from the size, comparison with
PSUs is not the right one, for almost the same reason that comparison with the private
sector is not right viz. the definition of what industry the government employees belong
to. Further, public sector organizations are commercial entities and have considerable
flexibility in determining the salaries of their employees. Not only is a one-to-one
comparison of levels/grades with the government difficult, there is also considerable
variation across public sector organizations.. Any government employee would compare
his/her pay with public sector first before looking at the private sector. We shall largely
focus on the pay scale and the CTG and important items of pay that stand out. In the case
of NTPC, the CTC of NTPC at the lowest level is about 1.2 to 1.5 times higher than the
CTG of government. But as the levels go up, the CTG difference come down. The CTG
of NTPC does include the telephone allowance and cost of mobile (taken as once in two
years), but not the generation incentive that is inherently variable and may impact the
actual CTG.
We have also added PF contribution from the employer’s side, canteen reimbursement
and tea expenses reimbursement to the CTG of NTPC. With respect to IOC, the CTC of
IOC is consistently at least 2.1 times more than that of the similar government scale. Oil
sector are the highest paying of the PSU and their pay levels we feel is aligned with the
private sector.. The minimum pay of the lowest pay level is higher for all the PSUs by at
least Rs 1500. It goes up to Rs 2050 in the case of comparison with IOC. The number of
levels is much lesser for the PSUs. Largely HRA and CCA are as per government pay
rules in most PSUs. But certain public sector organizations do give higher allowances for
leased accommodation. Children’s education allowance is Rs 200 while it is Rs 40 for
government.
XLRI Jamshedpur
132
Estimating cost to government
Items Government NTPC IOC HAL Minimum of pay scale of the lowest pay level
2550 3750 4600 2900
No. of levels 34 25 17 22 HRA and CCA Similar to govt. Canteen allowance 0 630-820 475 2500 Education allowance 80 150 200 N A
In the table below, we have shown the starting pay of IOC in the various pay-scales, and
have shown the CTC comparison. The table columns show the percentage increase of the
CTC of IOC over the government’s CTG. It should be however noted that, such blind
comparison of CTC across pay scales assuming that the pay levels are equivalent is not
advised as the assumption of equality of pay-levels need not be a valid one. Also, the
PSU has to cap its maximum basic pay below 30000, while the government can go up to
that level. The comparison shown below makes sense at the lowest level. Some amount
of knowledge of how the levels were arrived at is needed before making comparison
across all pay levels.
Percentage increase of IOC CTC over government’s CTG Post / Grade
Basic Salary
Post / Grade
IOC Basic Salary
Scale in govt
% increase of CTC over govt pay A1
A B1 B2 C
I 4600 S1 2550 1.83 1.78 1.76 1.76 1.73
IV 5400 S9 5,000
1.07 1.05 1.04 1.04 1.03
A 12000 S15 8000 1.17 1.14 1.14 1.15 1.13
The above comparison is done for entry levels (entry grades, entry grade for officers etc).
The CTC difference diminishes as we go up the level. The table below compares NTPC
CTC with the government. We have taken the government’s cost of LTC, HTC, medical
benefits etc. due to non availability of data with respect to NTPC.
Percentage increase/decrease of Government pay with respect to NTPC
XLRI Jamshedpur
133
Estimating cost to government
Post / Grade
Basic Salary of NTPC (at the min. of scale
Basic salary of Govt at the min. of scale A1 A B1 B2 C
W-0 S1 3750 2550 1.23 1.30 1.25 1.25 1.30
E2 S15 8600 8000 0.97 1.02 0.99 0.99 1.03
XLRI Jamshedpur
134
Estimating cost to government
16 RECOMMENDATIONS ON PAY COMPONENTS Pay in India has a plethora of components most of them owing their existence to taxation
while the rest owes its reason to competition. In fact, the reason for the popularity of
CTC was the need to get the “complete” picture given the plethora of components.
Basically, HRA shows that the employer cares for the shelter of the employee apart from
just paying him/her for the position occupied. But actually, it is only a split in the total
pay (read CTC) rather than an extra amount given. Though a number of allowances gives
a clumsy look to government pay, it definitely makes other HR systems easier viz.
transfer of employees across geographies. The various geography related allowances
facilitate all India transfer some extent given that the employee feels compensated for
taking the pain to go to a high altitude place or an island.
The recommendations that follow with respect to the CTC draws both from our views on
the subject and the information gathered from the employees through the survey. There
definitely is an opportunity to redesign the pay package. The responses from the
employees tell us that we can seek to design a cash rich compensation and shift the onus
of saving for the pension to the employee. Of course Job security being a huge benefit
shall be retained along with all this.
XLRI Jamshedpur
135
Estimating cost to government
16.1 Analysis of the strength of various CTC components
The CTG of employees belonging to the general category is approximately 3 times the
basic pay at the minimum of the pay scale. Category wise details are given in the tables
below. Table 16-1 CTG as a multiple of Basic: General Category
Grade/Post The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (A1 city)
The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG (C city)
The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG
(unclassified)
S1 3.81 3.42 3.38
S5 3.91 3.42 3.38
S9 3.60 3.20 3.16
S12 3.50 3.09 3.05
S15 3.46 3.04 3.00
S23 3.48 3.09 3.05
S33 3.22 2.85 2.82
Table 16-2 CTG as multiple of Basic pay: Railways
Grade/Post The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (A1 city)
The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG (C
city)
The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG
(unclassified)
S1 4.11 3.72 3.72
S5 4.07 3.66 3.63
S9 3.93 3.53 3.49
S12 3.86 3.45 3.41
S15 3.81 3.38 3.35
S17 3.72 3.27 3.27
S23 3.74 3.35 3.31
S33 3.38 3.01 2.98
XLRI Jamshedpur
136
Estimating cost to government
Table 16-3 Armed Forces (PBOR): CTG as a multiple of basic pay
Grade/Post The no. by which
BP should be
multiplied to arrive
at CTG (A1 city)
The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (C city)
The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (C city)
Sepoy 5.35 4.91 4.86
Havaldar 4.78 4.34 4.28
Subedar
Major
4.02 3.67 3.63
Table 16-4 Armed forces (Officers): CTG as a multiple of Basic pay
Grade/Post The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG (A1 city)
The no. by which BP should be
multiplied to arrive at CTG (C city)
Lieutnant/Sub
Lieutnant/Flying Officer
3.80
3.38
Major/Lt. Cdr./Sqdn
Leader
3.56 3.18
Vice Chief/Army
Commander/FoC-in-
C/AOC-in-C
4.02 3.16
Table 16-5 CPMF: CTG as a multiple of Basic Pay
Grade/Post The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (A1 city)
The no. by which BP
should be multiplied
to arrive at CTG (C
city)
The no. by which BP
should be multiplied to
arrive at CTG (unclassified
city)
DG
3.26
IG 3.46 3.06 3.03
Comdt 3.50 3.12 2.40
Asst Comdt 3.65 3.25 3.21
Havaldar/head constable 4.19 3.25 3.77
Constable 4.14 3.76 3.75
Follower 4.27 3.90 3.86
XLRI Jamshedpur
137
Estimating cost to government
For the general category, benefits are 30% of the CTG at S1 level and 21% of CTG at
S34 level (for A1 city). For the armed forces (officers) benefits are 30% of CTG at lower
levels and 27% of the CTG at the highest levels. For PBORs however, the benefits are
more pronounced. It is 50% at the sepoy level and 35% at the Subedar Major level.
The private sector pay is not so heavily loaded towards benefits as the Government’s
CTG though more data is needed to make a strong comparison. Private sector has a
component of variable pay which is less pronounced at the lower levels, something
missing in the government’s pay structure.
Amongst the benefits pension takes the cake (approximately 7-10%) at various levels.
The rest of the benefits diminish in weight as we move from lower levels to the higher
levels. This is because during costing we have assumed the same amount with respect to
components like medical insurance across all levels. It is also for this reason that the
number of times basic (at the minimum of the pay) needs to be multiplied to arrive at
CTG goes down as we go up the levels. Components like Gratuity and Home loan have a
maximum limit which reduces the weight of benefits as a percentage of CTG. HTA and
LTA uniformly occupy less then 1% of the CTG. The table below shows benefits as a
percentage of CTG for general category employees.
The table shows pension as the most pronounced benefit followed by the home loan
subsidy. Medical benefit which is higher in the lower levels goes down as one goes up
the levels as the amount is fixed.
Telephone as a benefit which appears only in the higher levels has a weight of
approximately 3% of the benefits while leave encashment maintains an approximate
weight of 2% across all levels.
XLRI Jamshedpur
138
Estimating cost to government
Post /
Grade
LTA HTA Telephones Newspapers Pension Gratuity Leave encash
Cost medical net Deductions
Medical insurance post retirement
Motor vehicle subsidy
computer advance subsidy
HBA interest subsidy per month
Ginsurance Benefit
Sum of all benefits
S1 0.43% 0.22% 0.00% 0.00% 7.87% 2.82% 1.72% 7.18% 5.53% 0.00% 0.00% 4.23% 0.28% 30.69%
S2 0.55% 0.27% 0.00% 0.00% 7.67% 2.74% 1.68% 9.24% 5.27% 0.00% 0.00% 4.12% 0.27% 32.58%
S3 0.54% 0.27% 0.00% 0.00% 7.69% 2.76% 1.68% 9.13% 5.20% 0.00% 0.00% 4.13% 0.27% 32.44%
S4 0.52% 0.26% 0.00% 0.00% 7.73% 2.76% 1.69% 8.84% 5.04% 0.00% 0.00% 4.16% 0.48% 32.23%
S5 0.48% 0.24% 0.00% 0.00% 7.83% 2.81% 1.71% 8.08% 4.61% 0.00% 0.00% 4.21% 0.44% 31.09%
S6 0.46% 0.23% 0.00% 0.00% 7.90% 2.83% 1.73% 7.77% 4.43% 0.00% 0.00% 4.25% 0.42% 30.68%
S7 0.38% 0.19% 0.00% 0.00% 8.15% 2.79% 1.78% 6.41% 3.66% 0.00% 0.00% 4.38% 0.35% 28.64%
S8 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 8.26% 2.51% 1.80% 5.59% 3.29% 0.00% 0.00% 4.44% 0.31% 28.19%
S9 0.91% 0.45% 0.00% 0.00% 8.33% 2.28% 1.82% 5.07% 2.99% 0.44% 0.44% 4.48% 0.28% 27.94%
S10 0.83% 0.42% 0.00% 0.00% 8.43% 2.10% 1.84% 4.67% 2.75% 0.41% 0.41% 4.53% 0.57% 27.37%
S11 0.71% 0.36% 0.00% 0.00% 8.53% 1.80% 1.86% 3.99% 2.35% 0.35% 0.35% 4.58% 0.49% 25.72%
S12 0.72% 0.36% 0.00% 0.35% 8.57% 1.81% 1.87% 4.02% 2.36% 0.35% 0.35% 4.61% 0.49% 26.21%
S13 0.64% 0.32% 0.00% 0.31% 8.74% 1.61% 1.91% 3.46% 2.10% 0.31% 0.31% 4.70% 0.43% 25.16%
S14 0.63% 0.32% 0.00% 0.31% 8.75% 1.60% 1.91% 3.44% 2.09% 0.31% 0.31% 4.70% 0.43% 25.11%
S15 0.82% 0.41% 0.00% 0.29% 8.67% 1.48% 1.89% 3.19% 1.94% 0.29% 0.29% 4.20% 0.77% 24.53%
S16 0.74% 0.37% 0.00% 0.26% 8.80% 1.34% 1.92% 2.88% 1.75% 0.26% 0.26% 4.26% 0.69% 23.81%
S17 0.74% 0.37% 0.00% 0.26% 8.80% 1.34% 1.92% 2.88% 1.75% 0.26% 0.26% 4.26% 0.69% 23.81%
S18 0.66% 0.33% 0.00% 0.23% 8.96% 1.19% 1.96% 2.41% 1.56% 0.23% 0.23% 4.34% 0.62% 22.93%
S19 0.68% 0.34% 0.00% 0.24% 8.91% 1.22% 1.95% 2.62% 1.60% 0.24% 0.24% 4.31% 0.63% 23.22%
S20 0.63% 0.31% 0.00% 0.22% 8.81% 1.13% 1.92% 2.30% 1.48% 2.10% 0.35% 4.26% 0.59% 24.32%
XLRI Jamshedpur
139
Estimating cost to government
Post /
Grade
LTA HTA Telephones Newspapers Pension Gratuity Leave encash
Cost medical net Deductions
Medical insurance post retirement
Motor vehicle subsidy
computer advance subsidy
HBA interest subsidy per month
Ginsurance Benefit
Sum of all benefits
S21 0.55% 0.27% 3.59% 0.19% 8.61% 0.98% 1.88% 1.99% 1.29% 1.82% 0.30% 4.17% 0.51% 26.34%
S22 0.52% 0.26% 3.40% 0.18% 8.68% 0.93% 1.90% 1.89% 1.22% 1.73% 0.29% 4.20% 0.48% 25.87%
S23 0.55% 0.27% 3.59% 0.19% 8.61% 0.98% 1.88% 1.99% 1.29% 1.82% 0.30% 4.17% 0.51% 26.34%
S24 0.47% 0.23% 3.08% 0.16% 8.81% 0.84% 1.93% 1.71% 1.11% 1.56% 0.26% 4.27% 0.44% 25.04%
S25 0.45% 0.22% 2.94% 0.16% 8.88% 0.81% 1.94% 1.63% 1.05% 1.49% 0.25% 4.19% 0.42% 24.58%
S26 0.71% 0.35% 2.73% 0.15% 8.95% 0.75% 1.96% 1.52% 0.98% 1.39% 0.23% 3.89% 0.39% 24.13%
S27 0.71% 0.35% 2.73% 0.15% 8.95% 0.75% 1.96% 1.52% 0.98% 1.39% 0.23% 3.89% 0.39% 24.13%
S28 0.47% 0.23% 3.08% 0.16% 8.81% 0.84% 1.93% 1.71% 1.11% 1.56% 0.26% 4.27% 0.44% 25.04%
S29 2.14% 1.07% 2.89% 0.26% 8.85% 0.66% 1.93% 1.34% 0.86% 1.22% 0.20% 3.42% 0.34% 25.24%
S30 1.37% 0.68% 2.46% 0.33% 9.20% 0.56% 2.01% 0.80% 0.74% 1.04% 0.17% 2.92% 0.29% 22.63%
S31 1.37% 0.68% 2.46% 0.33% 9.20% 0.56% 2.01% 0.80% 0.74% 1.04% 0.17% 2.92% 0.29% 22.59%
S32 1.29% 0.64% 2.32% 0.31% 9.29% 0.53% 2.03% 0.67% 0.69% 0.98% 0.16% 2.75% 0.27% 21.93%
S33 0.80% 0.40% 3.35% 0.29% 9.32% 0.49% 2.04% 0.62% 0.64% 0.91% 0.15% 2.55% 0.25% 21.80%
S34 0.70% 0.35% 2.95% 0.25% 9.47% 0.43% 2.07% 0.54% 0.57% 0.80% 0.13% 2.25% 0.22% 20.73%
XLRI Jamshedpur
140
Estimating cost to government
16.2 Existence of standard allowances
Standard allowances viz. housing, transport allowance, city compensatory allowances
owe their existence to taxation (as already stated). Apart from taxation, city
compensatory allowance helps in “localizing” pay to the cost of living in the city, as
dearness allowance is determined at a much broader level. This makes city compensatory
allowance a very important component of pay. But if housing allowance is determined as
a percentage of pay, CCA should follow a similar path in calculation. CCA should
technically change whenever DA changes, as it is a function of inflation. As an
alternative one could do away with CCA and have different DA values that differ
according to the class of city. There is also a new problem with organizations realizing
that they have to give monetary incentives (in the form of allowances) for their
employees so as to motivate them to work in rural areas. What was CCA for metros
becomes hardship allowance for rural areas (though not quantitatively). Even smaller
towns come under this category as they do not have schools and medical facilities that
metros and B class towns have.
The CCA has to be an ever changing amount and also should find its place in metros for
increased cost of living and in smaller towns as a kind of a hardship allowance. Given the
love for people to flock to metros, CCA is not necessary for metros. They probably need
a higher house rent allowance which is already there. Apart from basic pay and an
inflation component, others are not necessary (i.e. can be subsumed within the basic pay).
It is the tax benefits that make it necessary to show separate components in pay. This
gives rise to other allowances too like transportation allowance. There however is
another reason for all these allowances namely, contributory provident fund. PF is
calculated on basic+DA (and DP) and any allowance added to the basic will only increase
contributory PF (and even gratuity) making it even more costly to the employer.
The team is of the view that pay should be made simple and allowances kept at a
minimum. But in compensation, any component added to pay cannot be so easily
XLRI Jamshedpur
141
Estimating cost to government
withdrawn. To differentiate pay based on scales, basic pay and House rent allowance are
sufficient. Along with this dearness allowance will get added which will be determined
as a percentage of the basic pay. Transport allowance can also be there. But CCA should
be removed. There should be only the following allowances apart from basic pay
• House rent allowance
• Dearness allowance (which should ideally be different for metros and non-metros)
• Transport allowance (conveyance allowance).
Other allowances that are geography specific or function specific should be retained.
16.3 Pension
The response from the survey shows that pension is a highly respected/loved benefit.
However for the government it makes sense if it can transfer the onus of managing it to a
separate pension fund. Moreover, the government can give the 25-30% of the minimum
of pay-scale to the employee and let him/her park it in a pension fund. Transferring the
onus to the employee will also take care of the “lack of easy exit”. A step in this direction
has been taken by the government. As far as civilians (general category) joining after
1.1.2004 are concerned the new pension scheme is a contributory defined contribution
scheme.
Pension for armed forces should be retained as a defined benefit pension and managed by
the government. When the forces are fighting for our country the forces should feel
secure with respect to what their families will be getting in case of any unfortunate
incident. For the Jawans (PBOR), the pension is a very significant benefit and should be
retained as it is.
16.4 Army canteens
Benefits given to army viz. ration, canteen facilities etc. need to be revisited though the
ration seems to be a great benefit. The canteen as a benefit is getting mixed reactions,
though it should be seen more as a necessity (compensation) than as a benefit for areas
that are outside city limits. But canteens in cities and metros do not seem to add value.
The initial interaction the team had with some army officers gave the view that army
XLRI Jamshedpur
142
Estimating cost to government
canteens are not monetarily very beneficial. One way is to privatize the whole army
canteens so as to save money for the government in running these facilities. With the
retail industry in the rising stage, the army canteen facilities can be leased to a private
retail operator (or two to take care of competition).
16.5 Railway passes
The only unique benefit that railways have is the railway passes. Our discussion with the
very few people in the railways gives us a view that many do not use these passes. The
railways are not entitled to LTC. It is natural for employees of an organization to enjoy
some special benefits with regards to the final product of the organization. Hence
railways having special passes make sense. It also needs to be noted that, even if they
have a pass they have to get their tickets in the normal fashion and hence this does not
create any other advantage other than monetary compensation of the fare.
16.6 Gratuity
In the next few lines we offer no recommendations about gratuity. We only offer a caveat
regarding adding Gratuity to the CTC.
Gratuity is shown in the CTC calculation. However, Gratuity should be given only if the
employee has spent enough time in the service. Hence many private sector organizations
do not annualize gratuity. But some do, especially those that see higher attrition. Even
amongst those that do, no payment is made if the employee leaves within five years. But
annualizing Gratuity puts great pressure on the employer to pay the annual amount
sometimes, as attrition is a bigger problem.
Most of the traditional industries do not annualize gratuity as it defeats the very purpose
of paying gratuity. Gratuity is given for spending a minimum of five years in service.
16.7 Interest subsidies
Lastly interest subsidies to home loans and vehicle loans can be simplified by giving a
“interest rate subsidy” for a loan taken from any public sector bank. This saves a lot of
work on advances while retaining the benefit. Given the size of the government (in terms
XLRI Jamshedpur
143
Estimating cost to government
of number of employees), the government can negotiate with a leading PSU bank to offer
home loans to employees at reduced rate of interest. Of course, one might see a 0.5% or
1% reduction, but nevertheless it is a reduction. This can be done with vehicle loans too.
16.8 Medical facilities
The government employees probably have the most comprehensive health cover in the
country. There are no exclusions in the kind of diseases that are covered nor do medical
facilities cease post retirement. We sincerely doubt if there is any other employer to beat
that. Our recommendations are to continue with the present facilities to serve as a
benchmark to the industry. But we suppose that the administrative costs for the medical
facilities would be pretty high. The government can outsource the administration of
medical claims to an insurer to reduce human-days consumed in the management of
medical claims of the government employees.
XLRI Jamshedpur
144
Estimating cost to government
17 LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY The study using some assumptions has priced many benefits. These assumptions do not
have any data backing it up in many cases due to time constraints and lack of data. This is
one of the biggest limitations to this study. However, the monetary value added has been
done at conservative levels so as to not exaggerate the picture. Secondly though we used
the response from the employees the sample used was considerably small given the lack
of time.
XLRI Jamshedpur
145
Estimating cost to government
18 Annexure
18.1 Premium Rates of Mediclaim Policies
Premium Rates of Mediclaim Policies of Oriental
Insurance Company Ltd. In India
Age in Years Sum Insured Domiciliary
Hosp. Limit 3m-20 21-35 36-45 46-55 56-60 61-70 above 70
50000 10000 609 677 809 1265 1799 2688 3600
75000 15000 883 981 1174 1836 2604 3886 5203
100000 20000 1179 1310 1566 2447 3483 5196 6960
125000 23750 1454 1615 1932 3026 4310 6436 8683
150000 27500 1728 1920 2295 3605 5136 7676 10405
175000 31250 1975 2194 2623 4142 5912 8846 12040
200000 35000 2221 2468 2951 4680 6687 10018 13678
250000 40000 2660 2956 3534 5672 8133 12222 16778
300000 45000 3100 3444 4117 6664 9581 14428 19878
350000 50000 3483 3870 4627 7573 10925 16494 22805
400000 50000 3867 4297 5138 8483 12267 18562 25735
450000 50000 4252 4724 5647 9392 13611 20628 28663
XLRI Jamshedpur
146
Estimating cost to government
Source: www.Indiastat.com
18.2 Age group wise expectation of life in India
Age Group-wise Expectation of Life in India
(1901-2002)
At Birth Age 10 Age 20 Age 30 Age 40 Age 50 Age 60 Age 70
Fe- Fe- Fe- Fe- Fe- Fe- Fe- Fe-
Census
Year Male
Male
Male
male
Male
male
Male
male
Male
male
Male
male
Male
male
Male
male
1901 23.63 23.96 34.73 33.86 28.59 28.64 22.9 23.82 17.91 19.12 13.59 14.5 9.53 10.02 - -
1911(a) 22.59 23.31 33.36 33.74 27.46 27.96 22.45 22.99 18.01 18.49 13.97 14.28 10 10.11 - -
1921 19.42 20.91 29.64 29.21 25.46 25.41 21.64 21.78 17.93 18.31 14.3 14.95 10.67 11.67 - -
1931(a) 26.91 26.56 36.38 33.61 29.57 27.08 23.6 22.3 18.6 18.23 14.31 14.65 10.25 10.81 - -
1941 32.09 31.37 41.2 38.56 35.02 33.11 29.03 27.89 23.67 22.91 17.77 18.17 12.59 13.68 - -
1951 32.45 31.66 38.97 39.45 33.03 32.9 26.58 26.18 20.53 21.06 14.89 16.15 10.13 11.33 - -
500000 50000 4635 5150 6157 10302 14955 22696 31590
Note : Minimum sum assured is Rs. 50000/-
Source : Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 1526, dated 01.12.2006.
XLRI Jamshedpur
147
Estimating cost to government
1961 41.89 40.55 45.21 43.78 36.9 35.63 29.03 27.86 22.07 22.37 16.45 17.46 11.77 12.98 - -
1971(b) 46.4 44.7 48.8 47.7 41.1 39.9 33.5 32 25.9 25.4 19.2 19.7 13.6 13.8 - -
1980(c ) 54.1 54.7 56.1 58 47 49.2 38 41 29.3 32.5 21.4 24.3 14.6 17 - -
1990-
94$
59.4 60.4 57.3 59.3 48.1 50.3 39.1 41.6 30.3 32.8 22.1 24.2 15.1 16.5 - -
1991-
95@
59.7 60.9 57.5 59.8 48.3 50.8 39.3 42.2 30.5 33.4 22.3 24.8 15.3 17.1 - -
1992-
96*
60.1 61.4 57.7 60.2 48.5 51.2 39.5 42.6 30.7 33.8 22.5 25.1 15.4 17.5 - -
1993-
97*
60.4 61.8 57.8 60.4 48.5 51.3 39.5 42.7 30.7 33.8 22.5 25.1 15.5 17.5 - -
1994-
98*
60.6 62.2 57.8 60.6 48.5 51.5 39.5 42.8 30.8 34 22.6 25.3 15.5 17.7 10.2 11.6
1995-
99*
60.8 62.5 57.9 60.8 48.6 51.7 39.6 42.9 30.9 34 22.7 25.3 15.7 17.7 10.3 11.6
1996-00 61 62.7 57.9 60.9 48.6 51.9 39.7 43 31 34.1 22.8 25.5 15.8 17.8 - -
1997-01 61.3 63.6 58 61.3 48.7 52.2 39.8 43.3 31.2 34.4 23 25.7 16 18.1 - -
1998-02 61.6 63.3 58.2 61.5 48.9 52.4 40 43.6 31.4 34.7 23.2 26 16.1 18.3
Note : (a) : Expectation of life during the census years 1911 and 1931 relate to birth
XLRI Jamshedpur
148
Estimating cost to government
and age groups to 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69.
(b) : Based on 10% Rural and 20% Urban Sample.
(c) : Population projection for India 1981 -2001.
$ : Based on SRS relates to the period of 1990-94.
@ : Based on SRS relates to the period of 1991-95.
* : SRS based abridged life tables 1992-96 to 1995-99.
Source : Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India.
XLRI Jamshedpur
149
Estimating cost to government
18.3 Household consumption/consumer expenditure
MPCE Class-wise Value of Consumption of Broad Groups of Food and Non-food Items per Person for a Period of 30 days Using a Reference Period of 30 days for All Items and Using a Reference Period of 365 days for Clothing and Bedding, Footwear, Education, Medical (Institutional) and Durable Goods in Rural Areas of India (July 2004-June 2005)
MPCE Classes (Rs.)
all cla-
Item 0-235 235-270 270-320
320-365
365-410
410-455
455-510
510-580
580-690
690-890
890-1155
1155 & more sses
Cereal 69.21 79.6 86.98 91.47 95.26 98.83 101.91 106.42 110.83 113.67 119.17 134 100.65
Gram 0.19 0.31 0.42 0.52 0.58 0.61 0.68 0.78 0.82 0.94 1.34 2.01 0.73
Cereal Substitutes 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.27 0.25 0.27 0.37 0.48 0.69 1.04 1.48 0.39
Pulses & Pulse Products 8.2 10.78 11.98 13.57 14.86 16.28 17.18 18.27 19.91 22.28 24.85 31.23 17.18
Milk & Milk Products 4.42 9.31 13.65 20.29 27.9 33.8 44.28 53.11 63.89 84.26 113.58 137.9 47.31
Edible Oil 12.23 15.4 18.02 19.95 22.26 23.83 25.63 27.6 30.2 32.76 37.79 48.67 25.72
Egg, Fish & Meat 5 6.54 9.1 10.6 12.46 14.84 16.92 19.97 24.76 27.93 33.42 54.21 18.6
Vegetables 17.74 21.72 24.7 27.08 29.72 32.54 34.02 36.43 40.29 43.1 47.93 58.52 34.07
Fruits (Fresh) 1.48 2.19 2.75 3.53 4.54 5.69 6.5 7.86 10.1 13.98 20.38 35.2 8.44
Fruits (Dry) 0.27 0.49 0.65 0.82 1.11 1.25 1.55 1.94 2.35 3.24 4.81 8.24 1.98
Sugar 4.45 6.37 7.76 9.15 10.67 11.82 12.94 14.62 15.97 18.74 22.52 28.43 13.25
Salt 0.75 0.79 0.87 0.93 1 1.06 1.13 1.21 1.26 1.37 1.47 1.72 1.12
Spices 6.48 7.93 9.04 10.09 11.09 11.93 12.73 13.47 14.9 16.22 18.72 23.6 12.78
Beverages, Etc. 6.12 8.94 10.81 13.65 16.36 19.17 20.94 24.52 29.96 38.7 51.01 93.9 25.37
Total : Food 136.58 170.45 196.81 221.81 248.1 271.93 296.67 326.57 365.74 417.9 498.01 659.13 307.6
Pan 0.65 0.97 1.16 1.55 1.93 2.22 2.52 2.89 3.44 3.72 4.05 4.6 2.46
Tobacco 3.27 4.41 5.39 6 6.87 7.74 8.29 9.1 9.62 11.19 11.5 13.58 8.05
XLRI Jamshedpur
150
Estimating cost to government
Intoxicants 1.91 1.91 2.18 2.49 3.04 3.37 4.23 4.65 5.23 6.17 7.89 16.07 4.52
Fuel And Light 27.26 33.66 37.85 42.76 46.89 50.43 54.82 59.87 66.49 76.3 90.9 114.58 56.84
Clothing 2.37 3.76 5.7 8.05 10.73 13.48 17.52 21.85 29.07 44.53 63.39 136.43 25.33
Footwear 0.49 0.74 1 1.36 1.96 2.46 3.06 3.94 4.99 7.54 10.61 20.43 4.24
Education 1.65 2.79 3.54 5.39 6.58 7.29 9.95 11.5 15.55 25.77 35.87 87.24 14.9
Medical: Institutional 0.1 0.04 0.15 0.17 0.17 0.35 0.47 0.97 2.37 5.23 12.07 169.57 10.03
Medical: Non-Inst. 4.12 7.31 9 11.98 13.69 17.1 20.19 25.7 33.82 44.67 66.05 109.65 26.93
Entertainment 0.27 0.44 0.68 1.09 1.34 1.8 2.24 2.85 3.92 5.72 9.17 20.2 3.46
Minor Personal Effects 0.16 0.32 0.36 0.53 0.56 0.69 0.78 1.09 1.42 2.01 2.78 4.58 1.13
Toilet Articles 6.47 7.86 9.04 10.46 11.57 13.03 14.18 15.69 18.02 21.01 25.45 33.6 14.96
Other Hh Consumables 5.12 6.56 7.79 8.92 10.1 11.3 12.3 13.68 15.56 18.41 22.6 30.13 13.02
Conveyance 2.9 3.84 5.26 6.6 8.82 11.04 13.19 17.1 22.29 34.84 55.8 121.07 21.03
Other Consumer Services 5.42 7.57 9.06 10.74 11.97 13.29 15.53 18.09 21.96 31.75 47.57 99.06 21.18
Rent 0.07 0.06 0.22 0.33 0.39 0.57 0.8 1.32 2.37 3.65 7.53 28.56 2.77
Taxes And Cesses 0.19 0.3 0.36 0.45 0.62 0.69 0.8 0.99 1.24 1.65 2.51 5.84 1.12
Durable Goods 0.54 0.8 1.09 1.72 2.38 3.26 4.01 5.41 7.29 12.93 26.18 282.27 19.23
Total: Non-Food 62.95 83.35 99.82 120.59 139.62 160.14 184.88 216.68 264.66 357.09 501.93 1297.45 251.19
Total Expenditure 199.53 253.8 296.64 342.4 387.72 432.06 481.55 543.25 630.4 775 999.94 1956.57 558.78
Clothing:2nd Hand* 0.06 0.02 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.08 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.28 0.28 0.33 0.14
Durable Goods:2nd Hand* 0 0 0 0.02 0.1 0.06 0.04 0.13 0.22 0.4 1.5 21.44 1.24
Imputed Rent** 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Alternative Estimates Based On 365 Days Recall (For 5 Non-Food Categories Only)
Clothing 19.83 23.44 25.44 28.84 32 34.33 37.06 40.42 44.55 51.95 63.75 85.41 39.05
Footwear 2.18 2.68 3.08 3.59 4.29 4.73 5.33 6.13 7.19 8.74 11.18 15.15 5.86
Education 2.93 4.55 5.42 7.24 8.74 10.17 12.76 14.93 19.6 30.26 43.01 93.36 18.06
Medical-Institutional 1.18 2.17 2.02 4.15 4.12 4.54 5.76 8.22 9.89 15.1 22.28 55.21 9.41
Durable Goods 4.59 5.84 6.85 7.42 10.17 10.64 13.31 16.64 20.1 29.49 54.21 141.91 21.74
Total Expenditure 225.11 284.36 328 376.93 425.24 469.66 520.78 585.92 672.44 814.44 1046 1651.65 579.17
Note : * : included in total expenditure. ** : not included in total expenditure. Source : National Sample Survey Organization.
XLRI Jamshedpur
151
Estimating cost to government
18.4 Percentage distribution of responses to survey
Percentage distribution in the general category
No. Statement Don't Know Agree Disagree
1 I like my present job very much 0.32 89.05 10.63 2 I am overall very satisfied with my job 0.82 68.47 30.71
3 Many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job difficult 2.07 77.09 20.84
4 The present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my talents 1.25 47.9 50.86
5 The HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure 1.65 77.85 20.5
6 I feel I am being paid a fair amount of work I do 0.78 46.45 52.77
7 I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive 0.89 67.06 32.06
8 I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix at the beginning of every year 12.58 55.87 31.56
9 I feel un-appreciated by the organization when I think about what they pay me 5.08 62.97 31.96
10 The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be 1.92 29.16 68.93
11 There is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficiency
1.2 95.21 3.59
12 The pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me 1.74 83.4 14.87
13 My job as a government servant provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests
0.67 46.94 52.4
14 I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself
1.45 54.23 44.32
15 Though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation 4.57 56.48 38.95
16
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
1.51 36.81 61.68
17 The society looks down upon the government servants 3.65 46.41 49.95
XLRI Jamshedpur
152
Estimating cost to government
18 Government granted accommodation is a great benefit 1.85 77.58 20.58
19 Being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics 3.67 74.79 21.54
20 Almost everyone in the government sector avails his/her LTA facility 6.63 59.31 34.06
21 The joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me 6.44 56.15 37.41
22 Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled 3.31 58.91 37.78
23 I am satisfied that, a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays 0.62 60.82 38.57
24 The pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits
1.69 45.28 53.04
25
I feel that various department/services in Government have too many allowance and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization
12.57 58.11 29.32
26 By being a government employee I am serving the country 0.94 90.06 9
27 I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job. 0.62 85.67 13.72
28
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conductive to efficiently
3.93 65.48 30.6
29
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances +non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures efficiency
2.58 37.61 59.82
30 Those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted in my organisation
1.37 35.05 63.59
31 The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their developmental plans
5.71 45.32 48.97
32 There are no rewards for those who work here 2.66 60.07 37.27
33 When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive 1.47 51.32 47.21
34 My organisation encourages employees to plan for their career growth 1.95 38.92 59.13
35 There is too little chance for promotion on my job 0.94 76.58 22.48
XLRI Jamshedpur
153
Estimating cost to government
36 The opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization 1.27 32.72 66.01
37 I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be 3.49 66.8 29.72
38 Even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that make me continue here
0.61 84.74 14.65
39 A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job 0.44 72.9 26.66
40
It is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount
5.62 56.5 37.88
41 I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector
1.88 26.16 71.96
42
The pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent
6 59.11 34.89
43 By giving more cash to the employees, government can do away with the pension plan & let employees plan their pension
3.27 43.31 53.42
44 Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service compared to the private sector
0.86 91.64 7.5
45 Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will
4.57 52.79 42.64
46 If one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector
7.89 22.22 69.89
47
A 10.00 AM to 5.00PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than opting for a private sector job
3.87 43.77 52.36
48 Longer service in government sector makes one less attractive to private sector recruiters
14.21 58.04 27.75
49
The 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension
3.26 79.48 17.27
XLRI Jamshedpur
154
Estimating cost to government
50 Private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from government sector 19.92 51.23 28.85
51 With my qualifications, finding and attractive job in private sector will not be difficult
8.11 64.01 27.88
52
A reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a flexible exit policy for the government servants
6.31 76.75 16.95
53 With my experience, finding an attractive jon in private sector will not be difficult 8.84 62.13 29.03
54
The relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e. EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private sector
3.33 45.11 51.56
55 Medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector
3.86 33.45 62.69
56 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
6.66 66.58 26.76
57 I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay
3.97 52.55 43.48
58 Employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits
5.79 76.04 18.17
59 I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary 2.32 31.06 66.63
60
I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get
5.56 68.09 26.36
61 The quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash 1.69 69.58 28.73
62
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects and less on retirement, benefits because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
3.01 46.47 50.52
63 I fell that the cash component in the pay packet should be must more than turn non-monetary benefits
5.42 77.37 17.22
64
Pay the government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can allocate their resources wisely
2.54 56.43 41.04
65 The leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to 4.25 51.22 44.53
XLRI Jamshedpur
155
Estimating cost to government
66 Medical benefits in any organisation is inadequate to meet the needs of the employees
0.83 64.69 34.48
67 The medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organisation 2.16 39.19 58.65
XLRI Jamshedpur
156
Estimating cost to government
Annexe 2: Percentage Distribution of CPMF Data
No. Statement
SA
A
SA
SD
MD
SD
DK
Tota
l A
gree
Tota
l D
isag
ree
1 I like my present job very much 29.77 41.88 17.52 3.70 2.14 3.70 1.28 89.17 9.54
2 I am overall very satisfied with my job 11.68 35.33 24.36 12.54 7.69 5.13 3.28 71.37 25.36
3 I some times feel my job is meaningless 3.13 9.54 5.98 4.84 8.12 65.67 2.71 18.66 78.63
4 Many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job difficult 21.37 39.03 18.38 9.69 4.13 4.42 2.99 78.77 18.23
5 The job is pretty interesting to fully engage myself in. 14.96 35.75 14.81 11.82 8.69 8.83 5.13 65.53 29.34
6 The present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my talents 7.98 26.21 15.10 16.24 10.83 20.23 3.42 49.29 47.29
7 As a CPMF employee I hardly get any benefits from the government’s HRA policy
28.21 35.61 11.97 7.41 7.69 6.70 2.42 75.78 21.79
8 I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive 22.65 33.48 16.24 9.40 5.98 10.54 1.71 72.36 25.93
9 I feel I am being paid a fair amount for the work I do 9.13 22.25 16.12 18.54 8.84 22.25 2.85 47.50 49.64
10 I feel un-appreciated by the organization when I think about what they pay me
14.39 30.63 21.23 10.97 7.41 9.40 5.98 66.24 27.78
11 I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix[1] at the beginning of every year.
18.09 34.90 11.40 6.55 3.85 13.25 11.97 64.39 23.65
12 The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be.
4.84 13.53 12.11 20.09 15.24 30.20 3.99 30.48 65.53
13 The HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure
33.19 28.35 6.98 7.55 5.84 14.10 3.99 68.52 27.49
14 The leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to
8.83 28.21 16.10 13.68 15.24 15.81 2.14 53.13 44.73
15 There is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficacy
45.73 39.03 7.12 3.13 0.71 1.28 2.99 91.88 5.13
XLRI Jamshedpur
157
Estimating cost to government
16 Almost everyone in the government sector uses his/her LTA facility 16.38 40.60 14.96 12.39 2.28 5.84 7.55 71.94 20.51
17 Being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics
18.66 41.17 16.38 6.27 3.99 6.27 7.26 76.21 16.52
18 By being a government employee I am serving the country 44.73 36.18 5.70 6.55 1.71 4.27 0.85 86.61 12.54
19 Government granted accommodation is a great benefit 31.05 37.04 12.82 5.13 3.56 9.54 0.85 80.91 18.23
20 Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled 18.09 34.76 15.81 14.39 6.84 6.98 3.13 68.66 28.21
21 I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job.
26.07 45.01 17.24 5.56 2.14 2.85 1.14 88.32 10.54
22 I am satisfied that, as a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays
10.68 21.37 16.67 18.23 7.98 23.65 1.42 48.72 49.86
23
I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself
14.98 33.95 17.83 13.69 5.56 11.70 2.28 66.76 30.96
24 I enjoy the full benefits of the government granted accommodation 12.82 30.34 22.22 13.68 6.27 13.11 1.57 65.38 33.05
25
I feel that various departments/services in Government have too many allowances and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization
21.65 36.18 12.39 6.55 4.42 9.54 9.26 70.23 20.51
26
My job as a government servant provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests
6.55 13.68 11.97 12.96 13.82 38.89 2.14 32.19 65.67
27
The government adequately compensates me for the hardship I undergo due to my postings in difficult areas
7.56 20.26 11.41 9.99 11.98 36.52 2.28 39.23 58.49
28 The government compensates me adequately for the separation from the family
5.27 14.81 10.11 10.83 10.11 44.59 4.27 30.20 65.53
29 The joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me
8.40 29.34 20.94 13.39 4.99 10.83 12.11 58.69 29.20
XLRI Jamshedpur
158
Estimating cost to government
30
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures efficiency
5.84 17.38 20.66 13.82 10.40 27.35 4.56 43.87 51.57
31
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
8.26 14.39 18.95 17.24 10.68 28.06 2.42 41.60 55.98
32
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to efficiency
14.39 42.31 13.53 10.54 5.41 9.26 4.56 70.23 25.21
33
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to employee satisfaction
20.37 36.89 13.25 11.82 4.13 8.55 4.99 70.51 24.50
34 The pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me
16.95 44.87 18.38 6.84 3.85 3.99 5.13 80.20 14.67
35 The pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits
10.26 28.63 19.37 12.96 9.97 14.96 3.85 58.26 37.89
36 The society looks down upon the government servants 9.26 25.50 14.96 12.25 9.69 24.07 4.27 49.72 46.01
37 Though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation 12.39 22.93 16.38 10.83 11.82 19.80 5.84 51.71 42.45
38 I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be 16.24 36.61 17.81 10.68 5.84 7.69 5.13 70.66 24.22
39 My organization encourages employees to plan for their career growth
7.98 24.22 14.39 12.54 10.83 27.64 2.42 46.58 51.00
40
The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their developmental plans
5.98 31.34 15.53 9.69 9.69 22.36 5.41 52.85 41.74
41 The opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization 5.13 18.09 11.68 10.68 8.97 42.45 2.99 34.90 62.11
42 There are no rewards for those who work here 14.81 23.22 17.81 16.52 10.68 11.54 5.41 55.84 38.75
43 There is too little chance for promotion on my job 51.00 25.78 8.83 4.99 2.14 4.56 2.71 85.61 11.68
44 Those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted 9.12 17.09 11.68 12.54 11.40 33.76 4.42 37.89 57.69
XLRI Jamshedpur
159
Estimating cost to government
45 When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive
11.68 32.34 17.24 11.11 7.69 15.38 4.56 61.25 34.19
46 A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job 22.08 35.19 12.96 11.40 4.84 13.11 0.43 70.23 29.34
47 Even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that makes me continue here
24.64 42.02 16.67 4.70 3.70 7.12 1.14 83.33 15.53
48
A reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a more flexible exit policy for the government servants
26.78 41.74 9.54 6.13 5.84 5.27 4.70 78.06 17.24
49
By giving more cash to the employees government can do away with a pension plan and let employees plan their pension
20.66 24.79 9.83 8.83 7.41 23.65 4.84 55.27 39.89
50 Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will
20.94 33.76 10.11 6.41 6.84 18.09 3.85 64.81 31.34
51
I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector
12.82 17.24 9.69 16.67 15.38 25.36 2.85 39.74 57.41
52
If one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector
4.99 17.09 11.54 12.68 11.82 32.62 9.26 33.62 57.12
53
It is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount
20.83 31.95 10.13 7.56 7.99 16.98 4.56 62.91 32.52
54
Keeping in mind the intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private sector.
14.25 37.04 16.67 10.97 6.27 10.97 3.85 67.95 28.21
55 Longer service in government sector is seen as a liability by private sector recruiters
9.69 34.05 17.52 10.11 6.55 6.27 15.81 61.25 22.93
56
Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service compared to the private sector
42.23 39.66 7.85 3.57 2.14 2.43 2.14 89.73 8.13
57 It is not difficult for me to land a better paying job in the private sector if I so desire.
13.98 33.38 17.40 15.55 5.42 8.27 5.99 64.76 29.24
XLRI Jamshedpur
160
Estimating cost to government
58 Private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from government sector
8.12 28.49 17.38 16.95 6.13 8.69 14.25 53.99 31.77
59
The 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension
23.93 48.01 14.25 3.42 3.28 4.13 2.99 86.18 10.83
60
A 10.00 AM to 5.00PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than opting for a private sector job
8.13 20.68 10.41 13.55 14.12 25.25 7.85 39.23 52.92
61 It is not difficult for me to find a more challenging job in the private sector.
12.68 33.62 18.38 13.25 6.27 9.54 6.27 64.67 29.06
62
The pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent
13.96 27.78 21.51 11.54 4.84 8.83 11.54 63.25 25.21
63 With my qualifications, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult.
11.54 30.06 24.36 14.81 5.84 6.55 6.84 65.95 27.21
64
The relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e., EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private sector
8.55 26.64 22.79 14.96 6.41 14.39 6.27 57.98 35.75
65 With my experience, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult.
12.96 38.03 21.94 9.40 5.13 6.84 5.70 72.93 21.37
66 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
26.39 33.24 17.40 7.70 4.42 8.84 2.00 77.03 20.97
67
Pay in the government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can allocate their resources wisely
18.09 35.90 15.81 10.26 5.98 10.40 3.56 69.80 26.64
68 Employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits
29.20 41.45 10.26 6.55 3.28 3.28 5.98 80.91 13.11
69
I am separated from my family for most part of the year and there is no compensating factor for this separation
34.90 34.19 11.40 5.70 5.27 6.70 1.85 80.48 17.66
70 I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay
27.49 32.76 11.11 10.26 6.70 8.26 3.42 71.37 25.21
XLRI Jamshedpur
161
Estimating cost to government
71
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and leave the retirement benefits planning to the individual employees
22.51 30.20 13.11 6.98 6.98 16.38 3.85 65.81 30.34
72
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and less on retirement benefits, because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
18.52 26.35 14.10 12.11 6.70 17.38 4.84 58.97 36.18
73 I feel that the cash component in the pay packet should be much more than the non-monetary benefits
26.35 36.75 11.82 8.69 4.42 5.70 6.27 74.93 18.80
74 I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary 7.55 16.10 12.25 15.81 14.39 29.77 4.13 35.90 59.97
75
I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get
14.67 37.32 17.95 13.11 6.13 6.41 4.42 69.94 25.64
76 The quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash
18.09 29.77 15.24 10.68 3.13 18.95 4.13 63.11 32.76
77 Medical benefits in my organization is inadequate to meet the needs of the employees
18.95 35.04 14.10 11.40 7.12 11.11 2.28 68.09 29.63
78 Medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector
5.56 19.23 12.54 15.95 11.40 29.77 5.56 37.32 57.12
79 The medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organization
6.70 21.97 17.12 12.41 13.12 23.97 4.71 45.79 49.50
XLRI Jamshedpur
162
Estimating cost to government
Annexe -3 Percentage Distribution of Defence Data
No.
Statement
SA
A
SA
SD
MD
SD
DK
Tota
l Agr
ee
Tota
l D
isag
ree
1 I like my present job very much 14.66 37.70 26.70 9.69 6.81 4.45 0.00 79.06 20.94
2 I would prefer that my son/daughter joins the armed forces 6.79 14.36 12.79 10.97 11.75 30.29 13.05 33.94 53.00
3 I am overall very satisfied with my job 4.75 17.94 30.87 17.15 16.36 12.93 0.00 53.56 46.44
4 I am separated from my family for most part of the year due to the nature of my job
29.49 23.59 9.92 5.90 8.04 11.80 11.26 63.00 25.74
5 I feel my job is meaningless 3.95 5.79 10.26 12.11 7.89 58.95 1.05 20.00 78.95
6 My job is pretty interesting to full engage myself in. 9.23 26.91 24.80 17.68 6.86 12.40 2.11 60.95 36.94
7 Many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job difficult 23.48 31.66 23.22 9.76 3.96 3.17 4.75 78.36 16.89
8 The present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my talents 3.15 15.75 19.95 20.73 16.01 23.36 1.05 38.85 60.10
9
An employee of the armed forces saves a considerable amount of money by availing of the canteen services
6.77 16.67 21.35 10.16 12.50 23.44 9.11 44.79 46.09
10 Armed forces are in receipt of a number of travel concessions that serve their needs
6.86 17.15 13.72 10.55 12.14 19.53 20.05 37.73 42.22
11 The rations that I receive as an armed force employee is a substantial benefit to me
2.65 9.52 19.05 11.38 11.90 16.67 28.84 31.22 39.95
12 The pay package compensates for my absence from my family for most part of work life
2.91 6.08 8.20 7.94 10.32 47.35 17.20 17.20 65.61
13 The HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure
47.91 20.68 7.59 4.97 5.24 12.04 1.57 76.18 22.25
14 The hardship allowance I receive when posted in difficult areas serves its purpose
5.93 9.43 10.78 5.39 13.21 35.04 20.22 26.15 53.64
15 I feel I am being paid a fair amount of work I do 2.91 8.73 11.11 12.17 23.81 41.01 0.26 22.75 76.98
16 There are no rewards for those who work here 29.02 22.69 12.66 12.66 11.87 8.44 2.64 64.38 32.98
17 I am not satisfied with the benefits I 31.32 30.26 17.63 8.68 6.84 3.95 1.32 79.21 19.47
XLRI Jamshedpur
163
Estimating cost to government
receive
18 I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix at the beginning of every year
18.73 33.77 14.78 9.23 3.96 7.39 12.14 67.28 20.58
19 Armed forces canteen services is a very significant benefit provided by the government
9.21 29.47 20.00 9.47 7.63 18.68 5.53 58.68 35.79
20 I feel un-appreciated by the organisation when I think about what they pay me
22.43 29.29 23.75 8.18 4.75 4.49 7.12 75.46 17.41
21 The leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to
6.30 19.69 19.95 16.80 16.01 19.95 1.31 45.93 52.76
22 The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be
1.32 3.44 9.26 17.46 21.96 44.97 1.59 14.02 84.39
23 There is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficiency
68.60 23.48 4.49 1.32 0.53 0.79 0.79 96.57 2.64
24 Armed forces are beneficiaries of anumber of allowances that civilian employees do not receive
15.67 19.06 12.27 9.92 9.14 23.50 10.44 47.00 42.56
25 The pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me
26.51 40.68 13.12 7.09 4.99 7.35 0.26 80.31 19.42
26
My job as a government servant provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests
7.55 16.41 20.05 16.93 14.32 24.74 0.00 44.01 55.99
27
I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself
4.70 13.84 19.06 12.79 13.84 34.99 0.78 37.60 61.62
28 Though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation 26.72 34.13 10.85 6.61 6.08 10.32 5.29 71.69 23.02
29
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay+allowances+non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
4.69 5.21 12.24 16.93 19.53 40.89 0.52 22.14 77.34
30 The society looks down upon the government servants 13.54 24.22 20.05 11.98 11.46 15.10 3.65 57.81 38.54
31 Government granted accommodation is a great benefit 26.11 35.25 15.14 5.22 5.22 8.09 4.96 76.50 18.54
32 Being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics
13.10 30.48 15.78 13.10 6.95 15.24 5.35 59.36 35.29
33 Almost everyone in the government sector avails his/her LTA facility 7.11 25.79 18.16 15.53 9.74 14.74 8.95 51.05 40.00
XLRI Jamshedpur
164
Estimating cost to government
34 I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary 6.61 12.96 15.08 13.23 13.49 36.24 2.38 34.66 62.96
35 The joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me
2.63 15.53 26.84 16.32 9.74 21.58 7.37 45.00 47.63
36 Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled 19.21 26.84 22.37 13.16 7.63 5.00 5.79 68.42 25.79
37 I am satisfied that, a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays
10.32 26.98 20.90 10.32 7.67 23.28 0.53 58.20 41.27
38 The pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits
2.39 11.94 18.83 16.98 13.26 35.28 1.33 33.16 65.52
39
I feel that various department/services in Government have too many allowance and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization
16.14 22.49 17.20 8.20 5.82 9.79 20.37 55.82 23.81
40
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
32.63 35.00 15.26 7.63 3.16 3.42 2.89 82.89 14.21
41
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conductive to efficiently
29.52 34.84 17.29 7.45 3.72 4.26 2.93 81.65 15.43
42 By being a government employee I am serving the country 27.44 40.37 18.73 3.43 1.85 5.80 2.37 86.54 11.08
43 I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job.
15.83 31.93 29.82 7.12 7.65 6.33 1.32 77.57 21.11
44
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances +non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures efficiency
2.90 8.71 16.09 22.43 15.57 32.19 2.11 27.70 70.18
45 Those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted in my organisation
8.85 19.01 13.28 10.16 11.72 36.46 0.52 41.15 58.33
46
The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their developmental plans
4.21 17.37 17.11 13.95 8.16 28.68 10.53 38.68 50.79
47 When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive
4.74 21.84 19.21 17.37 13.16 22.89 0.79 45.79 53.42
XLRI Jamshedpur
165
Estimating cost to government
48 My organisation encourages employees to plan for their career growth
3.45 9.81 20.42 16.98 11.14 36.07 2.12 33.69 64.19
49 There is too little chance for promotion on my job 34.04 27.44 13.19 10.55 6.60 7.12 1.06 74.67 24.27
50 The opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization 3.67 13.65 12.86 16.80 16.54 35.43 1.05 30.18 68.77
51 I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be 21.26 31.50 20.21 11.55 8.14 3.94 3.41 72.97 23.62
52 Even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that make me continue here
14.36 36.55 25.07 8.88 6.01 7.83 1.31 75.98 22.72
53 A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job 7.39 24.80 30.08 9.76 12.93 13.72 1.32 62.27 36.41
54
It is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount
23.62 22.83 10.76 6.30 5.77 21.00 9.71 57.22 33.07
55
I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector
4.42 3.64 5.19 10.13 13.77 58.70 4.16 13.25 82.60
56
The pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent
7.41 14.55 14.29 15.08 14.55 30.95 3.17 36.24 60.58
57
By giving more cash to the employees, government can do away with the pension plan & let employees plan their pension
12.34 16.80 13.65 8.14 7.87 38.32 2.89 42.78 54.33
58
Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service compared to the private sector
64.66 27.23 2.88 2.36 0.79 1.31 0.79 94.76 4.45
59 Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will
24.15 21.52 9.97 8.14 6.56 24.67 4.99 55.64 39.37
60
If one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector
3.71 4.77 4.24 10.61 13.00 56.76 6.90 12.73 80.37
61
A 10.00 AM to 5.00PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than opting for a private sector job
6.63 17.77 14.06 9.81 10.88 36.07 4.77 38.46 56.76
62 Longer service in government sector makes one less attractive to private sector recruiters
21.28 22.61 15.43 13.03 9.84 11.44 6.38 59.31 34.31
63 It is not difficult for me to find a more challenging job in the private 20.63 30.95 17.46 8.47 6.35 10.58 5.56 69.05 25.40
XLRI Jamshedpur
166
Estimating cost to government
sector.
64
The 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension
26.39 31.13 20.32 5.80 2.11 6.33 7.92 77.84 14.25
65 It is not difficult for me to find a more challenging job in the private sector.
19.47 35.00 18.42 8.68 4.74 8.16 5.53 72.89 21.58
66 Private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from government sector
7.71 28.19 19.41 8.78 7.71 5.85 22.34 55.32 22.34
67 With my qualifications, finding and attractive job in private sector will not be difficult
22.11 33.68 21.05 8.68 4.21 3.95 6.32 76.84 16.84
68
The relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e. EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private sector
4.46 12.07 15.75 13.91 17.85 33.07 2.89 32.28 64.83
69
A reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a flexible exit policy for the government servants
22.61 36.44 18.35 4.26 2.66 4.52 11.17 77.39 11.44
70 With my experience, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult
19.53 33.07 16.67 11.98 5.73 5.47 7.55 69.27 23.18
71
Keeping in mind the intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private sector.
1.83 12.79 18.28 15.14 16.45 33.16 2.35 32.90 64.75
72 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
27.39 17.29 6.65 7.18 4.52 14.89 22.07 51.33 26.60
73 I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay
30.79 21.05 11.05 7.89 6.05 15.00 8.16 62.89 28.95
74 Employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits
21.81 32.98 17.82 6.38 5.32 5.59 10.11 72.61 17.29
75
I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get
17.15 35.88 16.09 10.82 5.80 5.28 8.97 69.13 21.90
76 The government should increase cash component instead of giving us the canteen benefit
28.84 19.58 6.88 7.67 11.11 16.14 9.79 55.29 34.92
XLRI Jamshedpur
167
Estimating cost to government
77 The quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash
25.13 26.98 15.61 8.73 4.50 16.93 2.12 67.72 30.16
78
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects and less on retirement, benefits because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
14.47 23.42 15.53 10.00 12.11 21.58 2.89 53.42 43.68
79
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects and less on retirement, benefits because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
18.42 21.05 16.58 10.79 11.05 20.00 2.11 56.05 41.84
80 I fell that the cash component in the pay packet should be must more than turn non-monetary benefits
31.66 34.04 17.15 3.96 2.37 3.69 7.12 82.85 10.03
81
Pay the government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can allocate their resources wisely
14.96 24.15 16.80 12.07 9.71 19.16 3.15 55.91 40.94
82 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
23.36 30.18 16.27 8.40 7.87 10.50 3.41 69.82 26.77
83 Medical benefits in any organisation is inadequate to meet the needs of the employees
21.41 18.54 15.14 15.93 14.62 13.84 0.52 55.09 44.39
84 Medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector
6.81 17.28 14.66 16.49 13.09 27.49 4.19 38.74 57.07
85 The medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organisation
5.73 10.94 23.44 15.89 16.93 24.74 2.34 40.10 57.55
XLRI Jamshedpur
168
Estimating cost to government
Annexe 4: Percentage Distribution of Railways
No. Statement
SA
A
SA
SD
MD
SD
DK
Agr
ee
Dis
agre
e
1 I like my present job very much 46.55 32.76 13.79 1.72 3.45 1.72 0.00 93.10 6.90
2 I am overall very satisfied with my job 21.43 39.29 14.29 8.93 8.93 7.14 0.00 75.00 25.00
3 I feel my job is meaningless 1.79 0.00 5.36 1.79 1.79 85.71 3.57 7.14 89.29
4 Many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job difficult 21.82 40.00 16.36 9.09 3.64 9.09 0.00 78.18 21.82
5 The job is pretty interesting to fully engage myself in. 12.07 44.83 22.41 3.45 10.34 6.90 0.00 79.31 20.69
6 The present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my talents 5.26 31.58 14.04 24.56 14.04 10.53 0.00 50.88 49.12
7 I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive 18.97 15.52 12.07 18.97 10.34 24.14 0.00 46.55 53.45
8 I feel I am being paid a fair amount for the work I do 15.79 26.32 28.07 7.02 12.28 10.53 0.00 70.18 29.82
9 I feel that employees use the railway passes facility at the most 50% pf their entitlement
8.77 45.61 15.79 12.28 7.02 5.26 5.26 70.18 24.56
10 I feel that railway passes given to us is a significant benefit 25.86 46.55 12.07 12.07 3.45 0.00 0.00 84.48 15.52
11 I feel that the railway passes that we get mostly go unused 7.02 15.79 22.81 15.79 5.26 33.33 0.00 45.61 54.39
12 I feel un-appreciated by the organization when I think about what they pay me
8.93 21.43 16.07 26.79 12.50 10.71 3.57 46.43 50.00
13 I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix[1] at the beginning of every year.
3.64 20.00 9.09 18.18 16.36 23.64 9.09 32.73 58.18
14 I believe that railways employees have too many allowances 3.57 5.36 12.50 12.50 14.29 51.79 0.00 21.43 78.57
15 The allowances available to railway employees need rationalization 6.90 51.72 15.52 8.62 3.45 6.90 6.90 74.14 18.97
16 The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be.
1.75 21.05 17.54 22.81 12.28 24.56 0.00 40.35 59.65
17 The HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure
36.21 34.48 12.07 3.45 5.17 8.62 0.00 82.76 17.24
18 The leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to
3.57 23.21 14.29 16.07 7.14 23.21 12.50 41.07 46.43
XLRI Jamshedpur
169
Estimating cost to government
19 There is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficacy
35.09 50.88 10.53 1.75 0.00 1.75 0.00 96.49 3.51
20 Almost everyone in the government sector uses his/her LTA facility 13.79 17.24 15.52 13.79 18.97 13.79 6.90 46.55 46.55
21 Being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics
17.24 46.55 18.97 1.72 1.72 13.79 0.00 82.76 17.24
22 By being a government employee I am serving the country 55.17 25.86 13.79 1.72 1.72 1.72 0.00 94.83 5.17
23 Government granted accommodation is a great benefit 10.34 32.76 27.59 5.17 15.52 8.62 0.00 70.69 29.31
24 Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled 8.62 13.79 15.52 20.69 20.69 18.97 1.72 37.93 60.34
25 I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job.
41.38 37.93 10.34 5.17 5.17 0.00 0.00 89.66 10.34
26 I am satisfied that, as a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays
13.79 34.48 10.34 17.24 8.62 15.52 0.00 58.62 41.38
27
I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself
12.07 25.86 13.79 17.24 15.52 13.79 1.72 51.72 46.55
28 I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary
6.90 12.07 10.34 17.24 18.97 32.76 1.72 29.31 68.97
29
I feel that various departments/services in Government have too many allowances and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization
17.24 25.86 13.79 3.45 12.07 17.24 10.34 56.90 32.76
30
My job as a government servant provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests
10.71 28.57 16.07 10.71 12.50 21.43 0.00 55.36 44.64
31
A 10.00 AM to 5.00PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than opting for a private sector job
8.93 25.00 7.14 16.07 14.29 26.79 1.79 41.07 57.14
32 The joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me
5.26 29.82 24.56 21.05 7.02 12.28 0.00 59.65 40.35
XLRI Jamshedpur
170
Estimating cost to government
33
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures efficiency
5.17 18.97 13.79 17.24 18.97 25.86 0.00 37.93 62.07
34
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
1.72 25.86 20.69 13.79 24.14 13.79 0.00 48.28 51.72
35
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to efficiency
7.14 35.71 8.93 21.43 7.14 16.07 3.57 51.79 44.64
36
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to employee satisfaction
12.50 28.57 12.50 21.43 10.71 7.14 7.14 53.57 39.29
37 The pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me
17.54 45.61 22.81 7.02 3.51 3.51 0.00 85.96 14.04
38 The pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits
7.02 17.54 19.30 19.30 10.53 26.32 0.00 43.86 56.14
39 The society looks down upon the government servants 1.79 21.43 19.64 21.43 17.86 14.29 3.57 42.86 53.57
40 Though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation 1.75 28.07 12.28 17.54 10.53 26.32 3.51 42.11 54.39
41 I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be 21.43 25.00 17.86 17.86 8.93 7.14 1.79 64.29 33.93
42 My organization encourages employees to plan for their career growth
3.45 13.79 22.41 10.34 20.69 27.59 1.72 39.66 58.62
43
The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their developmental plans
5.17 15.52 17.24 12.07 10.34 37.93 1.72 37.93 60.34
44 The opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization 1.72 13.79 12.07 22.41 20.69 29.31 0.00 27.59 72.41
45 There are no rewards for those who work here 12.28 31.58 15.79 21.05 10.53 8.77 0.00 59.65 40.35
46 There is too little chance for promotion on my job 21.05 28.07 19.30 12.28 7.02 12.28 0.00 68.42 31.58
XLRI Jamshedpur
171
Estimating cost to government
47 Those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted 3.51 10.53 10.53 28.07 7.02 40.35 0.00 24.56 75.44
48 When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive
5.17 32.76 15.52 15.52 12.07 18.97 0.00 53.45 46.55
49 A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job 24.14 27.59 24.14 0.00 10.34 13.79 0.00 75.86 24.14
50
Even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that makes me continue here
31.03 41.38 15.52 5.17 5.17 1.72 0.00 87.93 12.07
51
A reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a more flexible exit policy for the government servants
28.57 33.93 14.29 8.93 1.79 8.93 3.57 76.79 19.64
52
By giving more cash to the employees government can do away with a pension plan and let employees plan their pension
8.77 14.04 7.02 5.26 14.04 49.12 1.75 29.82 68.42
53 Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will
8.62 18.97 22.41 10.34 3.45 34.48 1.72 50.00 48.28
54
I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector
5.36 7.14 14.29 17.86 16.07 39.29 0.00 26.79 73.21
55
If one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector
1.82 3.64 10.91 18.18 30.91 29.09 5.45 16.36 78.18
56
It is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount
7.14 30.36 17.86 12.50 14.29 14.29 3.57 55.36 41.07
57
The intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private sector.
8.93 26.79 10.71 8.93 8.93 35.71 0.00 46.43 53.57
58 Longer service in government sector is seen as a liability by private sector recruiters
7.41 38.89 12.96 16.67 1.85 12.96 9.26 59.26 31.48
XLRI Jamshedpur
172
Estimating cost to government
59 It is difficult for me to land a better paying job in the private sector if I so desire
7.27 27.27 18.18 12.73 5.45 20.00 9.09 52.73 38.18
60
Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service compared to the private sector
33.93 46.43 8.93 1.79 1.79 7.14 0.00 89.29 10.71
61 Private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from government sector
8.77 17.54 19.30 17.54 8.77 10.53 17.54 45.61 36.84
62
The 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension
13.79 44.83 18.97 15.52 1.72 5.17 0.00 77.59 22.41
63 It is difficult for me to land a better paying job in the private sector if I so desire
10.34 25.86 15.52 15.52 12.07 8.62 12.07 51.72 36.21
64 With my qualifications, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult
8.77 26.32 15.79 19.30 14.04 5.26 10.53 50.88 38.60
65
The pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent
7.14 39.29 26.79 3.57 5.36 14.29 3.57 73.21 23.21
66
The relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e., EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private sector
3.51 19.30 15.79 12.28 24.56 24.56 0.00 38.60 61.40
67 With my experience, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult
7.02 21.05 22.81 14.04 12.28 10.53 12.28 50.88 36.84
68
Employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits
17.24 43.10 12.07 12.07 5.17 6.90 3.45 72.41 24.14
69 I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay
13.79 43.10 6.90 12.07 8.62 15.52 0.00 63.79 36.21
70
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and leave the retirement benefits planning to the individual employees
8.62 15.52 15.52 17.24 5.17 36.21 1.72 39.66 58.62
XLRI Jamshedpur
173
Estimating cost to government
71
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and less on retirement benefits, because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
8.62 12.07 17.24 17.24 10.34 32.76 1.72 37.93 60.34
72
I feel that the cash component in the pay packet should be much more than the non-monetary benefits
22.41 44.83 5.17 10.34 5.17 6.90 5.17 72.41 22.41
73
I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get
7.27 38.18 18.18 14.55 7.27 7.27 7.27 63.64 29.09
74 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
17.86 32.14 17.86 7.14 8.93 16.07 0.00 67.86 32.14
75
Pay in the government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can allocate their resources wisely
8.62 24.14 17.24 12.07 12.07 24.14 1.72 50.00 48.28
76 The quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash
15.79 36.84 14.04 7.02 7.02 19.30 0.00 66.67 33.33
77 Medical benefits in my organisation is inadequate to meet the needs of the employees
22.81 28.07 15.79 8.77 12.28 12.28 0.00 66.67 33.33
78 Medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector
3.57 17.86 1.79 28.57 12.50 35.71 0.00 23.21 76.79
79 The medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organization
3.57 10.71 17.86 26.79 17.86 23.21 0.00 32.14 67.86
XLRI Jamshedpur
174
Estimating cost to government
Annexe 5: Percentage Distribution of Postal Data
No Statement
SA
A
SA
SD
MD
SD
DK
Agr
ee
Dis
agre
e
1 I like my present job very much 28.87 49.48 16.49 2.58 2.06 0.52 0.00 94.85 5.15
2 I am overall very satisfied with my job 17.71 29.17 27.08 16.15 4.69 5.21 0.00 73.96 26.04
3 I feel my job is meaningless 2.07 1.55 6.74 1.55 7.25 78.24 2.59 10.36 87.05
4 Many of our rules & procedures make doing a good job difficult 15.54 36.27 21.24 6.22 12.4
4 7.77 0.52 73.06 26.42
5 The job is pretty interesting to fully engage myself in. 18.32 46.07 19.37 8.38 4.19 3.66 0.00 83.77 16.23
6 The present job gives me enough opportunities to utilize my talents 8.76 30.41 13.40 10.31 17.5
3 19.07 0.52 52.58 46.91
7 I am not satisfied with the benefits I receive 21.13 35.57 13.40 8.76 6.70 13.9
2 0.52 70.10 29.38
8 I feel I am being paid a fair amount for the work I do 8.25 20.10 17.01 15.46 15.9
8 23.20 0.00 45.36 54.64
9 I feel un-appreciated by the organization when I think about what they pay me
12.44 36.27 15.03 13.47 8.29 10.88 3.63 63.73 32.64
10 I should be given the option to decide on the pay mix[1] at the beginning of every year.
19.69 31.61 7.77 5.18 7.77 10.88
17.10 59.07 23.83
11 The amount of pay I currently receive is comparable to what I think it should be.
7.29 12.50 11.98 15.63 22.92
27.60 2.08 31.77 66.15
12 The HRA I am entitled to is inadequate to meet my accommodation expenditure
45.08 31.09 7.77 6.74 3.11 5.18 1.04 83.94 15.03
13 The leave travel allowance is one of the most attractive benefits we are entitled to
10.53 35.26 18.95 10.53 8.42 15.26 1.05 64.74 34.21
14 There is a pressing need to review and rationalize the pay structure to improve employee efficacy
63.92 30.41 1.55 1.55 0.52 1.03 1.03 95.88 3.09
15 Almost everyone in the government sector uses his/her LTA facility 20.83 30.21 16.67 10.42 7.81 10.9
4 3.13 67.71 29.17
16 Being a Government Servant saves me from compromising on my values and ethics
23.83 43.01 13.99 7.25 4.15 5.70 2.07 80.83 17.10
17 By being a government employee I am serving the country 62.89 25.77 3.61 1.03 1.55 4.64 0.52 92.27 7.22
18 Government accommodation is a great benefit 22.51 43.46 16.23 6.81 4.19 5.24 1.57 82.20 16.23
19 Hardly anyone gets government quarters, though they are entitled 8.81 34.72 17.10 16.58 8.81 11.4
0 2.59 60.62 36.79
XLRI Jamshedpur
175
Estimating cost to government
20 I am happy working with the government sector as it gives me a secure job.
33.51 38.14 15.46 4.12 2.58 6.19 0.00 87.11 12.89
21 I am satisfied that, as a government servant, I enjoy excellent leave benefits and holidays
18.65 44.04 15.03 8.29 5.70 7.77 0.52 77.72 21.76
22
I do not mind the relatively less salary in Government Service as the joy of serving the nation is a reward in itself
17.53 22.16 21.13 9.79 13.40
14.95 1.03 60.82 38.14
23 I feel that the government servants enjoy more paid leave than necessary
4.15 9.84 10.36 16.58 15.03
43.01 1.04 24.35 74.61
24
I feel that various departments/services in Government have too many allowances and benefits of sundry nature, which call for standardization
11.86 26.29 11.34 10.82 6.19 23.20
10.31 49.48 40.21
25
My job as a government servant provides me with adequate time and opportunity to pursue my other interests
8.25 26.29 21.65 11.86 13.92
17.53 0.52 56.19 43.30
26 The joy of associating with the government is a significant non-monetary benefit to me
9.42 33.51 18.32 6.81 16.75 8.90 6.28 61.26 32.46
27
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures efficiency
4.66 23.83 12.44 21.24 16.58
17.62 3.63 40.93 55.44
28
The pay structure presently prevailing in government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) ensures employee satisfaction
3.11 10.36 21.76 22.28 14.51
24.87 3.11 35.23 61.66
29
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to efficiency
13.40 32.99 11.86 12.37 17.01 7.73 4.64 58.25 37.11
30
The pay structure presently prevailing in the Government (pay + allowances + non-monetary & retirement benefits) is not conducive to employee satisfaction
15.46 30.93 15.46 10.82 14.43 8.25 4.64 61.86 33.51
31 The pride I derive by being a government servant is very important to me
19.07 41.75 26.29 4.64 1.55 5.15 1.55 87.11 11.34
32 The pride of being a government servant is more important than the pay and monetary benefits
9.38 19.27 17.19 14.58 14.06
23.96 1.56 45.83 52.60
XLRI Jamshedpur
176
Estimating cost to government
33 The society looks down upon the government servants 9.33 13.99 11.92 9.33 17.6
2 34.72 3.11 35.23 61.66
34 Though I am entitled, I do not have government accommodation 8.33 40.10 11.98 6.77 10.4
2 18.75 3.65 60.42 35.94
35 I don't feel my efforts are rewarded the way they should be 14.95 30.93 13.40 10.31 13.9
2 12.89 3.61 59.28 37.11
36 My organization encourages employees to plan for their career growth
2.59 25.39 7.77 10.36 13.47
38.86 1.55 35.75 62.69
37
The Annual Performance Evaluation practiced in our organization help employees in their developmental plans
5.70 36.27 9.84 10.88 11.40
20.73 5.18 51.81 43.01
38 The opportunity for career growth is adequate in my organization 4.19 17.80 16.23 11.52 21.9
9 27.23 1.05 38.22 60.73
39 There are no rewards for those who work here 23.44 21.88 15.10 15.63 7.29 14.0
6 2.60 60.42 36.98
40 There is too little chance for promotion on my job 37.50 30.21 9.90 8.33 7.81 6.25 0.00 77.60 22.40
41 Those who do well on the job stand a fair chance of being promoted 6.70 17.53 12.37 10.31 13.4
0 39.18 0.52 36.60 62.89
42 When I do a good job, I receive the recognition for it that I should receive
6.77 21.88 16.15 11.46 12.50
30.73 0.52 44.79 54.69
43 A secure job is more important to me than a high paying job 35.60 31.94 15.71 2.62 6.28 7.85 0.00 83.25 16.75
44
Even if my job is not as high paying as a private sector job, it is the job security that makes me continue here
31.09 44.04 16.58 3.11 1.04 4.15 0.00 91.71 8.29
45
A reduction in the minimum qualifying service for pension will go a long way in evolving a more flexible exit policy for the government servants
19.47 44.21 11.05 9.47 1.05 8.95 5.79 74.74 19.47
46
By giving more cash to the employees government can do away with a pension plan and let employees plan their pension
14.43 21.13 9.79 6.70 7.22 37.11 3.61 45.36 51.03
47 Government should let employees plan their own pension so that they can exit at their will
10.31 20.10 10.31 5.67 8.25 37.63 7.73 40.72
XLRI Jamshedpur
177
Estimating cost to government
48
I feel that, taking all the benefits and pay together, the pay package in Government Service is comparable to the private sector
5.70 11.40 7.77 13.47 16.06
45.08 0.52 24.87 74.61
49
If one puts the non-monetary along with monetary benefits of pay, it more than equals the pay in the private sector
4.19 12.04 9.95 18.32 22.51
23.04 9.95 26.18 63.87
50
It is necessary to reduce the minimum qualifying service to 5 years, for entitlement of pension -with a proportionate reduction in the pension amount
18.56 21.65 10.31 9.28 7.73 27.84 4.64 50.52 44.85
51
The intangible benefits such as status, position, power, that we as government servants enjoy, we are better off than comparable employees of private sector.
10.82 38.66 20.62 9.28 8.76 7.73 4.12 70.10 25.77
52 Longer service in government sector is seen as a liability by private sector recruiters
6.74 31.61 13.99 3.63 6.74 11.92
25.39 52.33 22.28
53 It is not difficult for me to land a better paying job in the private sector if I so desire.
10.31 22.68 23.71 12.37 12.37 8.25 10.3
1 56.70 32.99
54
Looking at the monetary aspects alone, I feel that the pay is less in Government service compared to the private sector
50.52 37.63 4.64 3.09 1.55 2.06 0.52 92.78 6.70
55 Private sector recruiters have an aversion to recruit from government sector
7.61 25.54 16.85 11.41 3.80 9.24 25.54 50.00 24.46
56
The 20 years mandatory service forces employees to spend that many years in service with the sole objective of getting pension
15.79 40.53 20.00 7.89 7.89 5.79 2.11 76.32 21.58
57
A 10.00 AM to 5.00PM job is an important reason why I continue in the government service, rather than opting for a private sector job
8.95 32.63 14.74 9.47 14.21
18.95 1.05 56.32 42.63
58 It is not difficult for me to find a more challenging job in the private sector.
9.38 32.81 17.19 11.46 8.33 13.54 7.29 59.38 33.33
59 With my qualifications, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult.
8.76 28.87 24.74 15.46 6.70 6.70 8.76 62.37 28.87
60
The pride of association with the government does offset the lower pay (compared to the private sector) to some extent
6.74 31.61 25.39 11.92 9.33 9.33 5.70 63.73 30.57
XLRI Jamshedpur
178
Estimating cost to government
61
The relatively lesser salary we get in Government is, to a large extent, compensated by leave benefits, i.e., EL, CL & SL, as compared to the private sector
7.29 21.35 22.92 14.06 11.98
18.23 4.17 51.56 44.27
62 With my experience, finding an attractive job in private sector will not be difficult.
8.29 26.94 20.21 20.73 6.22 7.77 9.84 55.44 34.72
63 Employees should be allowed to choose the extent of cash component as against the non-monetary benefits
31.61 34.20 12.44 9.33 3.11 5.70 3.63 78.24 18.13
64 I feel that all the benefits currently being given should be converted into cash and paid as part of pay
28.35 27.32 12.37 10.31 7.22 12.37 2.06 68.04 29.90
65
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and leave the retirement benefits planning to the individual employees
7.77 17.10 11.40 11.40 9.84 39.90 2.59 36.27 61.14
66
I feel that Pay in the government should focus more on cash aspects, and less on retirement benefits, because employees can plan and fund their own retirement benefits
8.25 19.07 8.25 13.40 9.28 39.18 2.58 35.57 61.86
67 I feel that the cash component in the pay packet should be much more than the non-monetary benefits
27.46 42.49 9.33 9.84 5.18 2.59 3.11 79.27 17.62
68
I think the cash component of the pay in the government sector is too low compared to the non-monetary benefits that the government employees get
19.90 38.22 11.52 9.95 9.95 8.90 1.57 69.63 28.80
69 I would prefer if the government gives me equivalent cash instead of giving me various benefits
27.84 24.23 18.04 9.79 6.19 11.34 2.58 70.10 27.32
70
Pay in the government sector should have more focus on cash aspects than retirement benefits as employees can allocate their resources wisely
9.95 26.70 15.18 13.09 5.24 23.56 6.28 51.83 41.88
71 The quantum of various types of leave can be curtailed by compensating with cash
27.46 42.49 10.88 6.22 3.63 8.81 0.52 80.83 18.65
72 Medical benefits in my organization is inadequate to meet the needs of the employees
34.72 25.39 8.81 8.29 9.33 12.95 0.52 68.91 30.57
73 Medical benefits and allowances in government sector is more attractive than in the private sector
5.67 20.10 8.76 12.37 8.76 38.66 5.67 34.54 59.79
74 The medical benefits and allowances are certainly attractive in my organization
9.95 8.38 20.42 14.14 11.52
34.03 1.57 38.74 59.69
XLRI Jamshedpur
179
Estimating cost to government