xeus cryogenic instrument 26 - 27 october 2004 cryogenic x-ray sensor development in us, europe and...
TRANSCRIPT
XEUS Cryogenic Instrument 26 - 27 October 2004
Cryogenic X-ray sensor development in US, Europe and Japan
Micro-calorimeters
• Doped - thermistors
Astro-E2 6 x 6 pixel array (GSFC/Wisconsin/JAXA)
Single pixel work also at Harvard – Smithsonian in collaboration with INAF, Palermo
Sub-mm and IR-bolometers (spiderweb) at JPL/Caltech, MPIfR, Bonn and CEA/Saclay (CEA also arrays)
- doped-Si or doped-Ge thermometers - HgTe or Sn absorbers - Typical pixels of 0.25 – 1mm square - J-FET read-out (no multiplexing)/MOSFET’s - E ≥ 4 eV @ 1 – 6 keV with τ ≈ 1 – 10 ms
Pro: proven technology
Con: difficulty making large arrays due to fabrication by hand and absence of low-noise multiplexed read-out; limitations in speed and resolution
XEUS Cryogenic Instrument 26 - 27 October 2004
Cryogenic X-ray sensor development in US, Europe and Japan
Micro-calorimeters– Phase-transition thermometers (TES)
• X-Ray applicationsCon-X (arrays/TDM/cryogenics) preparations – NIST/GSFC/WisconsinTES gamma-ray sensors (single pixels) – LLNLXEUS (arrays/FDM) preparations - SRON/MESA/VTTTES single X-ray pixel development – INFN, GenuaNEXT/DIOS/XEUS (arrays/FDM) - ISAS/Metropolitan/Waseda
• Sub-mm applicationsScuba II sub-mm 10.000 pixel array (2005) – NIST/ATCGround-based sub-mm arrays with TDM – GSFC/NISTSub-mm bolometer arrays/filters and FDM - UCBerkeley Stanford Optical TES
Sub-mm bolometer arrays and read-out - MPIfR, Bonn/JENA Sub-mm TES array/filter development - Cardiff/Cambridge/SRON
XEUS Cryogenic Instrument 26 - 27 October 2004
Cryogenic X-ray sensor development in US, Europe and JapanMicro-calorimeters
– Phase-transition thermometers (TES)Characteristics
• MoCu, TiAu and IrAu TES• Bi absorbers• Typical pixel size 250 x 250 μm2
• Array size up to 8 x 8 E > 2.8 eV @ 5.9 keV, τ ≈ 0.1 – 1 ms• SQUID amplifiers with TDM or FDM
Pro and Con’s
Pro: TES is maturing in the 2000 – 2010 timeframe, Large arrays possible from manufacturing and read-out point of view. Potential energy resolution improvement by factor 3:
)(34.0)(FWHM
keVEeVE SATCon: speed limited to about 0.1 ms, pixels larger than 0.5 mm difficult without loss of resolution
XEUS Cryogenic Instrument 26 - 27 October 2004
Cryogenic X-ray sensor development in US, Europe and Japan
Micro-calorimeters:– Magnetic calorimeters (single pixels so far)
Brown Univ/Heidelberg UnivNIST(recently also GSFC started)CharacteristicsAu:Er thermometersMetallic (Au) absorbersE = 3.4 eV @ 5.9 keV, τ = 60 ms, T = 35 mK, B = 3mT
Pro and Cons:Prospect for ≈ 1 eV energy resolution with large absorbers
Cons:Sensor speed limited to 0.1 – 1 ms by large heat capacity and e-
ph coupling to the bath
XEUS Cryogenic Instrument 26 - 27 October 2004
Cryogenic X-ray sensor development in US, Europe and Japan
Non-equilibrium sensors:– Superconductive tunnel junctions
USA - LLNL (single pixels); Yale (1-D structures)Europe - ESTEC for optical and X-ray applications (single pixels, 1-D/2-D structures, and arrays)
PSI, Villigen; TUM, Munich; CNR, NapoliJAPAN - IAST,Tsukuba; Riken, Tokio
Characteristics• Ta/AlO/Ta structures most successful• Arrays made up to 18 x 32 E ≈ 2 eV @ 1 keV and 6 eV @ 6 keV obtained• Typical 25 – 50 micron pixels• Τ ≈ 10 μs
Pros:Fast response time and good energy resolution for E < 2 keV
Con’s:Difficulty to make large pixels while retaining energy resolution and speedRead-out of large arrays difficult due to magnetic field requirement and lack
of adequate multiplexing