x-band based injector layout: s2e modelling€¦ · 3d design •3d tracking with space charge for...
TRANSCRIPT
X-Band Based Injector Layout: S2E modelling
Oct 2nd, Geneva, 2019
Outline
• Overview of the facility layout and LINAC module
• At Mid-term Review Meeting 2019
• Further 1D simulation design study with more linearizer options
• 3D simulation study by A. Aksoy
• Summary and coming work
3
Baseline and module layout for two modes (HX@100 Hz & SX@1 kHz)https://espace.cern.ch/compactlight/_layouts/15/start.aspx#/XLS%20wiki/
Low Energy LINAC Section High Energy LINAC Section
https://espace.cern.ch/compactlight/XLS%20wiki/RF-module.aspx
At 2019 Mid-term Review (Helsinki)1D X+K scheme at HX mode 1D stability and tolerance study
*X. Liu, Mid-term Review Meeting, Jul 3, 2019https://indico.cern.ch/event/804400/contributions/3484991/
More linearizer options!S-Band Acc
3 GHz, N? Cell 15 MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
1S-Band gun
3 GHz, 1.6? Cell 100 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
2C-Band gun
6 GHz, 3.6? Cell 200 MV?
C-Band Acc6 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
3X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Dogleg
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
4X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
K-Band lnz36 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
InjectorDesign Linac Design
Undulator Design
S2E modeling
S-Band Acc3 GHz, N? Cell
15 MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
1S-Band gun
3 GHz, 1.6? Cell 100 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
2C-Band gun
6 GHz, 3.6? Cell 200 MV?
C-Band Acc6 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
3X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Dogleg
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
4X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
K-Band lnz36 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
V-Band lnz48GHz
S-Band Acc3 GHz, N? Cell
15 MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
1S-Band gun
3 GHz, 1.6? Cell 100 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
2C-Band gun
6 GHz, 3.6? Cell 200 MV?
C-Band Acc6 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
3X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Dogleg
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
4X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
K-Band lnz36 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
S-Band Acc3 GHz, N? Cell
15 MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
1S-Band gun
3 GHz, 1.6? Cell 100 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
2C-Band gun
6 GHz, 3.6? Cell 200 MV?
C-Band Acc6 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
3X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Dogleg
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
4X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
K-Band lnz36 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
S-Band Acc3 GHz, N? Cell
15 MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
1S-Band gun
3 GHz, 1.6? Cell 100 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
2C-Band gun
6 GHz, 3.6? Cell 200 MV?
C-Band Acc6 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Lnz12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
3X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Dogleg
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
4X-Band gun12 GHz, 5.6? Cell
300 MV?
BC1Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
Undulatorlu ,K,
N? section
BC2Chicane
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
X-Band Acc12 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
K-Band lnz36 GHz, N? Cell
G MV/m
𝐗𝟎 𝐗𝟏 𝐗𝟐
K/V/𝑁𝑜𝑛𝑒
Gradient Vs Length for Linearizers*
* Curtesy by X. Wu(WP4)
RF/Linearizers specifications
* a [mm] g [mm] l [mm] Eacc [MV/m] length [m] Voltage [MV]Klystron power
K-band(36 GHz)
2
2.17586 2.77586
30.46 0.66 20.104
3MW *41.8 37.41 0.54 20.201
2 29.595 0.75 22.196
2 25 0.75 18.75 2MW *4
V-band(48 GHz)
1.5 1.707 2.082 32.24 0.47 15.15282 MW *3
2 1.707 2.082 18.22 0.83 15.1226
𝐗𝟎 𝐗𝟏 𝐗𝟐
𝐾/𝑉
<a> [mm] Phase advance/cell [MV/m] Length[m]
X-band 3.5 120 65 (HX) (108 cells)*X. Wu(WP4)
<- old setting
K-band (36 GHz)
a=1.8mm, L=0.54m, g=37.4 MV/m a=2mm, L=0.66m, g=30.5 MV/m
BC1BC1
BC1 BC1
INJINJ
INJ INJ
BC2
BC2
BC2
BC2
END
END
END
END
a=2mm, L=0.75m, g=29.6 MV/m a=2mm, L=0.75m, g=25 MV/m
Improved from Helsinki ->
𝐼 > 5𝑘𝐴Δ𝐸
𝐸< 0.05%
Bunch length < 2um
t[mm/c]
A. Aksoy
Bonus I: V-band(48 GHz)
a=1.5mm, L=0.47m, g=32.2 MV/m a=2mm, L=0.83m, g=18.2 MV/m
𝐼 > 5𝑘𝐴Δ𝐸
𝐸< 0.05%
Bunch length < 2um
BC1INJ
BC2 END
BC1INJ
BC2 END
Bonus II: without linearizer!
Longitudinal wakefield from the x-band structure works like a passive linearizer.
𝐼 > 5𝑘𝐴Δ𝐸
𝐸< 0.05%
Bunch length < 2um
BC1INJ
BC2 END
X0
X1
BC1INJ
BC2 END
X0
X1
LINAC design results in terms of linearizers
a[mm]-L[m]𝝓𝟎
[degree]Linearizer
[MV]𝑹𝟓𝟔,𝑩𝑪𝟏
[m]𝝓𝟏
[degree]𝑹𝟓𝟔,𝑩𝑪𝟐
[m]𝝓𝟐
[degree]
k-band(36GHz)
1.8-0.54 11.24 6.06 -0.0258 37.73 -0.0064 27.19
2-0.66 13.43 9.59 -0.0214 41.36 -0.0053 32.62
2-0.75 17.15 19.06 -0.0146 37.08 -0.0055 -16.56
2-0.75 [L]* 13.25 7.06 -0.0214 36.53 -0.0063 -1.02
v-band(48GHz)1.5-0.47 22.20 14.26 -0.0113 25.14 -0.0063 33.17
2-0.83 21.27 12.46 -0.0117 23.21 -0.0074 13.28
none- 9.51 - -0.0273 29.97 -0.0088 -18.34
- 8.34 - -0.0307 29.11 -0.0094 -16.79
* Low gradient, namely the old setting for k-band structure• All cases fulfil the requirements• Two-chicane layout turns out to be better• Required voltage for k-band is lower than linear estimation• Synchronize phase for LINAC-1 and LINAC-2 is large, further optimization can be done
Wakefield dominated design !
𝑉𝑙𝑛𝑧 =1
ℎ2𝑉𝑥𝐶𝑜𝑠 𝜙𝑥 , ℎ𝑘 = 3, hv = 4
Lattice Design and module layout*
*A. Aksoy (WP6), WP2 meeting, Sep 13, 2019https://indico.cern.ch/event/847553/
InjectorLINAC-end
X+K scheme 3D Simulation for LINAC* *A. Aksoy (WP6), WP2 meeting, Sep 13, 2019https://indico.cern.ch/event/847553/
Status of S2E Modeling for X+K scheme
Injector LINAC FEL/undulator
1D Design
• Longitudinal beam dynamics
• HX based Linac parameters
• SX mode operation optimization
• Linearizer RF parameters and bunch compressor
3D Design
• Transverse/longitudinal beam dynamics
• Lattice design and module layout
• Verify with 1D optimization results
• Optimize the lattice design & linaclayout
Stability & Tolerance
Study
• (1D tested)
• HX mode
• SX mode
WP43D Design
• 3D tracking with space charge for x-band injector 1D analysis
• Undulator reviews
• Scheme comparison
• Semi-/analytical tools and simulation tools
3D simulation
• undulator design
• FEL performance evaluation
We’re here!
Summary and coming work
• Conclusion• 1D optimization tool is powerful and there are many working cases for different• For X+K scheme, different linearizer design will result in different linac settings and
they all seem good. Needs to be check in 3D simulation.
• Coming work• A. Aksoy pointed out that there is discrepancy between 1D results (with Track1D)
and 3D results (with PLACET), the reason(s) must be understood• Longitudinal beam intensity profile needs to be improved in 3D simulation• Undulator simulation to be included with existing/coming beam distribution to
complete the S2E simulation workflow• Synchronize with other schemes (e.g. S+X+K, C+X+K, no K) in progress/simulation
tools• Tolerance/stability study in 3D case