www.monash.edu.au institute of transport studies standing committee on transport – urban...
TRANSCRIPT
www.monash.edu.au Institute of Transport Studies
Standing Committee on Transport – Urban Congestion Management Working GroupNational Workshop on Urban Transport Modelling
Public Transport
Professor Graham CurrieChair of Public Transport, Institute of Transport Studies, Monash University
2Institute of Transport Studies
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Ten Issues
3. Recommendations
3Institute of Transport Studies
This paper focuses on Public Transport Modelling Issues associated with Urban Congestion
• It concerns modelling issues associated with public transport but related to urban congestion in Australia
• A major aim is to identify issues and recommendations for COAG
• Many of the comments made are relevant to other areas of transport modelling
4Institute of Transport Studies
Recommend-ations
TenIssues
It is structured as follows:
5Institute of Transport Studies
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Ten Issues
3. Recommendations
6Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
7Institute of Transport Studies
Optimism Bias is the cause of the Australian rail forecast ‘disasters’ – have we solved it?
• Sydney and Brisbane Airport Railways failed due to forecast error
• Flyvbjerg (1996) Rail Patronage Forecasts:– on average, the actual patronage on the sample rail
projects was 40% lower than forecast;– at the 95% confidence interval, the patronage was
between 19% to 60% lower than forecast• Causes (McGregor and Raimond, 2005):
– Strategic Misrepresentation– Judgement Bias– Methodological Bias– Poor Project Definition
• Need for Independent Advice• Need for Informed Second Opinion• Need to Control Use of Modelling Results
8Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
9Institute of Transport Studies
The cause of today’s congestion is predict and provide planning – have we stopped yet?
TrafficCongestion
NeedMore RoadCapacity
Do TrafficModelling
StudyProveNeed for
More Roads
Provide More
Roads
TrafficGrowth
PredictAnd
Provide
Modelling IssuesModelling Issues
• Modelling the induced demand problem long term
• Disappearing Traffic and Road Diets
• Accurate representation of wider social effects of traffic congestion
• Accurate representation of public transport choices
• Exogenous factors influencing demand
• Modelling the induced demand problem long term
• Disappearing Traffic and Road Diets
• Accurate representation of wider social effects of traffic congestion
• Accurate representation of public transport choices
• Exogenous factors influencing demand
10Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
11Institute of Transport Studies
Most PT modelling uses 4 step models – these are hopeless at anything but broad PT forecasting
Source: Zhao, Yong and Kara Kockelman. “The Propagation of Uncertainty through Travel Demand Models: An Exploratory Analysis.” Annals of Regional Science 36 (1), pp. 145-163, March 2002.
Where does Forecasting a
2-10% PT modeshare fit into
this levelof accuracy?
12Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
13Institute of Transport Studies
PTA models have more detailed data but have a range of weaknesses
Public Transport Assignment Models (PTA)Public Transport Assignment Models (PTA)
• Model Public Transport modes only but to a greater degree of detail
• Involves good quality origin destination surveys
• Focus is shorter term tactical planning
• Involves reassignment of trips between PT modes and routes
• Based on Fixed or ‘elasticised’ trip matrices. Can be interfaced with MMT models
• Model Public Transport modes only but to a greater degree of detail
• Involves good quality origin destination surveys
• Focus is shorter term tactical planning
• Involves reassignment of trips between PT modes and routes
• Based on Fixed or ‘elasticised’ trip matrices. Can be interfaced with MMT models
Modelling IssuesModelling Issues
• No representation of ‘choice’ road user markets
• Fails to represent impacts of expansion of services into new areas/ new trips
• No detailed representation of
– Mode split
– Trip redistribution
• No representation of ‘choice’ road user markets
• Fails to represent impacts of expansion of services into new areas/ new trips
• No detailed representation of
– Mode split
– Trip redistribution
Auckland NZ has a Combined 4 Step and PTA ModelAuckland NZ has a Combined 4 Step and PTA Model
• Combines the benefit of detail on base PT system usage with multi-modal modelling
• Handles the problem of PT expansion into new areas
• Combines the benefit of detail on base PT system usage with multi-modal modelling
• Handles the problem of PT expansion into new areas
14Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
15Institute of Transport Studies
Most authorities are wondering how to consider transit oriented development in modelling
Base CaseLand Use
Base CaseNetworks
Base CaseModel
Option Case
Networks
OptionCase
Forecast
Option CaseLand Use(TransitOriented
Development)
Option CaseModel
16Institute of Transport Studies
While land-use transport modelling remains more theoretical than practical
Base CaseLand Use
Base CaseNetworks
Base CaseModel
Option Case
Networks
OptionCase
Forecast
Option CaseModel
Option CaseLand Use
Modelling IssuesModelling Issues
• No before and after data to calibrate land use transport models
• Lack of empirical data
• Very difficult to understand inter-relationships between land use and networks in models
• No before and after data to calibrate land use transport models
• Lack of empirical data
• Very difficult to understand inter-relationships between land use and networks in models
17Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
18Institute of Transport Studies
Few urban models work under PT capacity constraint though this now dominates big city transit
19Institute of Transport Studies
Capacity>Frequency>Growth ConundrumCapacity>Frequency>Growth Conundrum
No solution to the Capacity>Frequency>Growth Conundrum has been found
OverloadedTransit
Increase Capacity
IncreaseFrequencyMarket
Growth
20Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
21Institute of Transport Studies
Transit priority remains the most efficient use of limited congested roadspace
22Institute of Transport Studies
But modelling of priority is remarkably simplistic
RESEARCH REFERENCE
Vuchic (2)
Black et al (8)
Jepson and Ferreira (7)
Radwan & Benevelli (3)
Oldfield et al (4)
Delgoffe (9)UK Dept. of Transport(6)
Approach to Traffic Flow Modelling (✔=Approach Adopted)
No Direct Consideration of Traffic Impacts
✔
No Specific Model Adopted ✔
Standard Static Analytical or Mathematical Model
✔ ✔ ✔
Dynamic Traffic Simulation Modelling Used
✔ ✔ -
Travel Behaviour Modelling (✔=Included ✘ = Not Included)
Speed Flow Capacity Analysis ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Traffic Route Diversion Considered ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔ ✔ ✔
Mode Shift Considered ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔
Trip Generation Considered ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✔
Disappearing Traffic Considered ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘ ✘
Table - Alternative Traffic Flow and Travel Behaviour Modelling Approaches in Public Transport Priority Evaluation Research.
Source: Currie G Sarvi M Young W (2006) ‘A New Approach to Evaluating On-Road Public Transport Priority Projects: Balancing the Demand for Limited Road Space” Transportation (published on line 15th Nov 2006 - DOI 10.1007/s11116-006-9107-3)
23Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
24Institute of Transport Studies
We don’t know why big city rail demand is booming
Source: VCEC (2006) Inquiry into Managing Transport Congestion
100.0
110.0
120.0
130.0
140.0
150.0
160.0
170.0
1994-1995
1995-1996
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-6
Rail Boardings M p.a.
25Institute of Transport Studies
Modelling emphasis is on endogenous factors not exogenous
EXOGENOUS FORECASTSThings that affect society as a whole – not controlled
by Transit Operators
EXOGENOUS FORECASTSThings that affect society as a whole – not controlled
by Transit Operators
• Socio-Economic influences on demand. Such as changes in :
– Population
– Employment/ Unemployment
– Income
– Age distribution
– Fuel Costs
• Socio-Economic influences on demand. Such as changes in :
– Population
– Employment/ Unemployment
– Income
– Age distribution
– Fuel Costs
ENDOGENOUS FORECASTSThings that Transit Operators/Planners can change
ENDOGENOUS FORECASTSThings that Transit Operators/Planners can change
• Fare
• Service Level (Frequency)
• Travel Time/Speed
• Reliability
• Service design – route alignment
• Amenity provision (seats, shelter, information, quality of the environment, personal safety)
• Fare
• Service Level (Frequency)
• Travel Time/Speed
• Reliability
• Service design – route alignment
• Amenity provision (seats, shelter, information, quality of the environment, personal safety)
26Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
27Institute of Transport Studies
Post implementation reviews create informed quality modelling…..
Option Case
Networks
TransportModel
Option Case
Forecast
PostImplementation
Review
Mo
dellin
gIm
pro
vemen
t
28Institute of Transport Studies
…..but are rare as hens teeth
Option Case
Networks
TransportModel
Option Case
Forecast
PostImplementation
Review
Mo
dellin
gIm
pro
vemen
t
29Institute of Transport Studies
2. Issues
a. Optimism Bias
b. Predict and Provide
c. Generality – The 4 Step Problem
d. Specificity – The PTA Problem
e. Land Use and Transit
f. Capacity Constraint
g. Road Space Allocation
h. Exogenous Drivers
i. Post Implementation Reviews
j. Knowledge Management
30Institute of Transport Studies
Australian knowledge sharing about modelling is dispersed, often lost and almost non existant
• Not fully funded or continuous
• Limited participation• Limited modelling
SCOT
• Very limited funding• Single workshop in
25 years on modelling
ITE
TransportProfessionalAssociations
• Not focused on knowledge development
• Professional Advocacy Group
• Not Transit Related• Limited/No
Modelling Publications
• Good industry knowledge sharing e,g, marketing group
• No publications• Limited research
• Good industry knowledge sharing
• Few publications• Nothing on
modelling
• Good industry knowledge sharing
• Few publications• Road/ Highway
specific
Industry Advocacy Groups
• Doesn’t deal in strategic knowledge transfer
• Rarely transit multi-modal
• Often ‘Gunzels’/ rail enthusiasts
ProfessionalJournals
• Little Transit• Rather Theorectical• Deals in new
knowledge• Poor industry
distribution or interest
AcademicJournals
ARRB
31Institute of Transport Studies
KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT processes – good people but almost zero dissemination
• Consulting – very state/territory based
– very limited knowledge sharing (commercial issues/ confidentiality issues/ political issues)
• Academia– not much real public transport work
– trend towards very theoretical work
• Commercial World– concern over intellectual capital rights
32Institute of Transport Studies
The USA has an extensive open inclusive industry participation and knowledge development/ sharing program for all transport research
Federal Transit Administration
(Sponsor)
TransportationResearch
Board
TransitDevelopmentCorporation
NationalAcademy of
Sciences
AmericanPublic
TransportationAssociation
Transit Cooperative Research Program
US FederalGovernment
TCRP Structure TCRP Research Process
Annual Problem Statements
Free and open to all for suggestions• Transit Agencies/ APTA• TRB Staff/ TRB Committees• FTA/ Universities• Consultants
Problem Statement Selection
(Workshops)
TCRP Oversight & Project Selection Committee (TOPS)
• FTA Strategic Goals and Priorities
Project ResourcingTEA 21-Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century
Call for TendersResearch Providers
Provider Selection
Research
Publication (Free Web Download)
TRCP Project Panel
Related Activities
TransportationResearch
Board
AmericanPublic
TransportationAssociation
Annual Conference Annual Conference
TRB Committee Meetings
33Institute of Transport Studies
In PT It conducts knowledge development in 9 fields and 6 program areas, with 4 strategic goals and 5 strategic priorities
Program AreasProgram Areas
1. Safety and Security2. Equipment and Infrastructure3. Fleet Operations4. Specialized Transit Services5. Planning and Policy6. Professional Capacity Building
1. Safety and Security2. Equipment and Infrastructure3. Fleet Operations4. Specialized Transit Services5. Planning and Policy6. Professional Capacity Building
Strategic Goals and Policy InitiativesStrategic Goals and Policy Initiatives
1. Security Readiness2. Ridership3. Project Planning and Oversight4. Workforce Development
1. Security Readiness2. Ridership3. Project Planning and Oversight4. Workforce Development
Strategic PrioritiesStrategic Priorities
1. Customer first2. Transit in a technologically
advanced society3. Continuously improve transit4. Flourish the multi-modal
system5. Revistalize transit organizations
1. Customer first2. Transit in a technologically
advanced society3. Continuously improve transit4. Flourish the multi-modal
system5. Revistalize transit organizations
A OperationsA Operations
11. Scheduling12. Vehicle Operations13. Control Systems14. Fare Collection15. User Information
Systems16. Safety and Security
11. Scheduling12. Vehicle Operations13. Control Systems14. Fare Collection15. User Information
Systems16. Safety and Security
TCRP Problem Areas
B Service ConfigurationB Service Configuration
21. System Planning22. Specialized Service
Planning23. Service Performance24. Marketing
21. System Planning22. Specialized Service
Planning23. Service Performance24. Marketing
C Vehicle Equi EngineeringC Vehicle Equi Engineering
21. Buses22. Vans23. Heavy Rail Cars24. Commuter Rail Vcls25. Light Rail Cars26. People Movers27. Vehicle Components
21. Buses22. Vans23. Heavy Rail Cars24. Commuter Rail Vcls25. Light Rail Cars26. People Movers27. Vehicle Components
D Fixed Facility EngineeringD Fixed Facility Engineering
41. Buildings42. Rail Operating
Facilities43. Passenger Stops and
Terminals44. Bus Stop Facilities
41. Buildings42. Rail Operating
Facilities43. Passenger Stops and
Terminals44. Bus Stop Facilities
E MaintenanceE Maintenance
51. Vehicle Servicing52. Vcl. Inspectn & Maint.53. Vcl Corrective Repairs54. Overhaul & Rebuilding55. Non-Vcle Maintenance56. Maintenance
Management
51. Vehicle Servicing52. Vcl. Inspectn & Maint.53. Vcl Corrective Repairs54. Overhaul & Rebuilding55. Non-Vcle Maintenance56. Maintenance
Management
F Human ResourcesF Human Resources
61. Recruitment62. Training63. Employee Reviews64. JobClassification65. Salary Administration66. Labor Relations67. Performance Imprvemnt
61. Recruitment62. Training63. Employee Reviews64. JobClassification65. Salary Administration66. Labor Relations67. Performance Imprvemnt
G AdministrationG Administration
71. Financial Management72. Procurement &
Inventory Control73. Risk Management74. Law75. Management Info
Systems76. Transit Organizations
71. Financial Management72. Procurement &
Inventory Control73. Risk Management74. Law75. Management Info
Systems76. Transit Organizations
H Policy and PlanningH Policy and Planning
81. Policy Analysis82. Planning83. Economics84. Environmental
Analysis
81. Policy Analysis82. Planning83. Economics84. Environmental
Analysis
J Special ProjectsJ Special Projects
91. Areas not covered91. Areas not covered
166 project reports& 60 industry synthesis
34Institute of Transport Studies
TRB Modelling activities are extensive
ADB00: Section - Travel Analysis Methods
ADB00: Section - Travel Analysis Methods
ADB00 Section - Travel Analysis Methods
ADB10 Traveler Behavior and Values
ADB20 Telecommunications and Travel Behavior
ADB30 Transportation Network Modeling
ADB40 Transportation Demand Forecasting
ADB50 Transportation Planning Applications
ADB60TTask Force on Moving Activity-Based Approaches to Practice
ADB99AInnovations in Travel Demand Modeling: A Conference
ADB00 Section - Travel Analysis Methods
ADB10 Traveler Behavior and Values
ADB20 Telecommunications and Travel Behavior
ADB30 Transportation Network Modeling
ADB40 Transportation Demand Forecasting
ADB50 Transportation Planning Applications
ADB60TTask Force on Moving Activity-Based Approaches to Practice
ADB99AInnovations in Travel Demand Modeling: A Conference
AP000: Public Transportation GroupAP000: Public Transportation Group
AP000 Public Transportation Group
AP010 Transit Management and Performance
AP015 Transit Capacity and Quality of Service
AP020 Emerging and Innovative Public Transport and Technologies
AP025 Public Transportation Planning and Development
AP030 Public Transportation Marketing and Fare Policy
AP035 Transit Fleet Maintenance
AP040 Major Activity Center Circulation Systems
AP045 Intermodal Transfer Facilities
AP000 Public Transportation Group
AP010 Transit Management and Performance
AP015 Transit Capacity and Quality of Service
AP020 Emerging and Innovative Public Transport and Technologies
AP025 Public Transportation Planning and Development
AP030 Public Transportation Marketing and Fare Policy
AP035 Transit Fleet Maintenance
AP040 Major Activity Center Circulation Systems
AP045 Intermodal Transfer Facilities
AP050 Bus Transit SystemsAP055 Rural Public and
Intercity Bus Transportation
AP060 ParatransitAP065 Rail Transit SystemsAP070 Commuter Rail
TransportationAP075 Light Rail TransitAP080 Rail Transit System
DesignAP085 Ferry Transportation
AP050 Bus Transit SystemsAP055 Rural Public and
Intercity Bus Transportation
AP060 ParatransitAP065 Rail Transit SystemsAP070 Commuter Rail
TransportationAP075 Light Rail TransitAP080 Rail Transit System
DesignAP085 Ferry Transportation
ADA00: Section - Transportation System Policy,
Planning and Process
ADA00: Section - Transportation System Policy,
Planning and Process
ADA00 Section - Transportation System Policy, Planning and Process
ADA10 Statewide Multimodal Transportation Planning
ADA20 Metropolitan Policy, Planning, and Processes
ADA30 Transportation Planning for Small and Medium-Sized Communities
ADA40 Transportation Needs of National Parks and Public Lands
ADA50 Transportation Programming, Planning, and Systems Evaluation
ADA60 Public Involvement in Transportation
ADA00 Section - Transportation System Policy, Planning and Process
ADA10 Statewide Multimodal Transportation Planning
ADA20 Metropolitan Policy, Planning, and Processes
ADA30 Transportation Planning for Small and Medium-Sized Communities
ADA40 Transportation Needs of National Parks and Public Lands
ADA50 Transportation Programming, Planning, and Systems Evaluation
ADA60 Public Involvement in Transportation
35Institute of Transport Studies
Is it time to do this in AustraliaIf yes, HOW?
36Institute of Transport Studies
Agenda
1. Introduction
2. Ten Issues
3. Recommendations
37Institute of Transport Studies
To tackle all the problems identified we need to solve Australias knowledge development and sharing problem
Optimism BiasPredict and Provide
Generality – The 4 Step Problem
Specificity – The PTA Problem
Land Use and TransitCapacity Constraint
Road Space AllocationExogenous Drivers
Post Implementation ReviewsKnowledge Management
Key PT Modelling IssuesKey PT Modelling Issues COAG RecommendationsCOAG Recommendations
• An Australian Transportation Research Board
– Build on the US model– Define priority research and
education areas– Scrupulous industry involvement
and sharing of all results– ATRF as a national conference
federally supported each year– Sponsor research committee to
focus research areas like modelling around the national conference
• An Australian Transportation Research Board
– Build on the US model– Define priority research and
education areas– Scrupulous industry involvement
and sharing of all results– ATRF as a national conference
federally supported each year– Sponsor research committee to
focus research areas like modelling around the national conference