www.kleinschmidtusa.com b y : j eff c offin, p.e. s r. c ivil e ngineer /h ydrologist k leinschmidt...
TRANSCRIPT
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
AVOIDING A DAM MIDLIFE CRISIS
BY: JEFF COFFIN, P.E.SR. CIVIL ENGINEER/HYDROLOGISTKLEINSCHMIDT ASSOCIATES
MIDLIFE CRISIS
What causes a midlife crisis for a dam...
...and what can happen as a result?
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
MIDLIFE CRISIS!
Symptoms:
• old, tired feeling• in a rut• may seek new partner
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
TOOLS...
Can’t monitor dam’s mental/emotional health, so need to focus on physical health.
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
CONGESTIVE DAM FAILURE
Want to avoid this type of midlife (or young-age) crisis.
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
WHY BE CONCERNED? CONSEQUENCE:
Owner: Lose ability to generate power
Others: Lose water supply, navigation, recreation benefits
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
DAM-SAFETY CHECKUP – BASIC APPROACH
1. Hazard Potential
2. Regular Inspections/Evaluations
3. PFMA / DSSMPwww.KleinschmidtUSA.com
1. HAZARD POTENTIAL DETERMINATION
Based on Consequence of Failure:
High: Loss of life possible due to breach
Significant: No loss of life, but major property damage
Low: No significant impacts
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
2. REGULAR INSPECTION/ENGINEERING EVALUATIONYearly by FERC engr.Every 5 years by IC
Protocol: Visual inspection to assess condition Analysis (or review) of:
Spillway adequacy Structural stability
Review of S&M data
Single most important inspection tool?
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
THE MOST IMPORTANT DAM INSPECTION TOOL:
The Eyes!
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com(thanks to Kim de Rubertis)
3. POTENTIAL FAILURE MODE ANALYSIS
Multi-disciplinary team
Review background info.
Identify PFMs
Classify PFMs (priority)
Focus DSSMP on PFMs
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
TWO RECENT DAM MIDLIFE “INCIDENTS”
1. Embankment Dam with boils at toe after 9+ year drought
2. Gravity Dam hit by piece of rock from abutment
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
1. EMBANKMENT DAM – NEBRASKA
Constructed 1937-41 (age 70) / 163 ft high, 3.1 mi longEarth foundation, sheetpile cutoff wallDrought in CO-WY-NE: reservoir failed to fill 2002-2009High 2010 precip., raised res. 25 ft higher than prior 7 yearsBoils at toe – raised concern, prompted investigation
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
1. EMBANKMENT DAM (CONT.)Boils noted in toe drains – lateral and longitudinal drainage ditches at toe of damInvestigation:
Review of current and historical data (seepage flows, piezometer levels)
Site visit Preliminary seepage analysis
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
1. EMBANKMENT DAM (CONT.)Findings:
Boils present historically (e.g. 1987)
2010 boils similar to 1987 but smaller
No evidence of transport of soil
Current seepage flows and piezometer levels were within historical ranges (data since 1953)
Vert. hydraulic gradient estimated to be approximately 0.5-1.0 ft/ft (boils gen. result from 0.5-0.8)
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
1. EMBANKMENT DAM (CONT.)Recommendations:
Continue monitoring: Visual monitoring of boils Toe drain flows Piezometer levels
Install 2 nested piezometers to verify vert. gradients
Evaluate in detail during next Part 12D inspection (2011-12)
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
2. GRAVITY DAM – MONTANA
Rock-filled timber crib constructionConstructed 1905-07 (age 104)38.5 ft high, 257 ft long3-ft thick reinforced concrete overlay with post-tensioned anchors added in 1989
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
2. GRAVITY DAM (CONT.)
Rock bolts added in 1974 to stabilize left abutment cliff
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
2. GRAVITY DAM (CONT.)POOP HAPPENS: August 2010 – piece of rock cliff fell from left abutment onto damPiece estimated at 205 tons: 32’ L x 11’ H x 2-17’ WDamage to steel superstructure and gates, relatively minor apparent damage to dam crest
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
2. GRAVITY DAM (CONT.)Findings and follow-up:
PFM ID’d in 2005 PFMA (PFM No. 1, Cat. II) – est. up to 285-ton rock could fall
Rock fall came from formation to left of that stabilized in 1974
Reservoir lowered to aid damage inspection/repair
Detailed inspection of rock face and rock bolts by geotech. engr.
Repairs to gates and superstructure planned
Further stabilization of rock cliff planned
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com
RE-CAP: TO AVOID DAM MIDLIFE CRISIS
1. Know Dam’s Hazard Potential
2. Regular Inspections/Evaluations (Eyes!)
3. PFMA – to ID & Prioritize PFMs
4. DSSMP – focused on PFMs
www.KleinschmidtUSA.com