wto-state of play dec-03
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
1/21
WTO-AoA NEGOTIATIONS
STATE OF PLAY
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
2/21
GENESIS
WTO Came into existence on 1-1-1995 with the conclusion of UruguayRound Multilateral Trade Negotiations at Marrakesh on 15thApril 1994, to :
Provide common institutional framework for conduct of trade relationsamong members
Facilitate the implementation, administration and operation ofMultilateral Trade Agreements
Lay down Rules and Procedures Governing Dispute Settlement
Provide Trade Policy Review Mechanism
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
3/21
Agreement on Agriculture (AoA)
To establish a fair and market orientedagricultural trading system through substantial
progressive reduction in agricultural supportand protection resulting in correcting andpreventing restrictions and distortions in world
agricultural markets.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
4/21
AREAS OF COMMITMENTS
Domestic Supporti.e. subsidies byGovernments to domestic producers;
Market Accessi.e. the disciplines on importrestraints and tariffs; and
Export Competition i.e. export subsidiesand other forms of export subsidisation.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
5/21
Domestic Support
Green Box - Research, Extension, PDS, Decoupled
Payments etc;
Blue Box - Production Limiting Subsidies ; Amber Box - AMS-subject to reduction commitments viz
- Product specific (MSP)
- Non product specific (input subsidies-fert. Power,
irrigation) ;
Total Agricultural support reduction (Base period : 1986-88)
Developed countries 20 % (1995 - 2000)
Developing countries 14% (1995 - 2004)
De-minimis level
Developed countries 5% ;
Developing countries 10% .
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
6/21
Market Access
All non-tariff barriers including, Quantitative Restrictions to be
abolished
Tariff cut Commitments :
Developed countries - Average 36%
- Minimum 15% (1995 - 2000)
Developing countries - Average 24 %
- Minimum 10% (1995 - 2004)
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
7/21
IMPACT ON INDIA (Market Access)
Bound tariff * levels for India:
Primary products 100%
Processed products 150%
Edible oils 300%
* (Some exceptions (119 items) are governed by other
provisions of GATT Art.II 1(b).
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
8/21
Export Subsidies
Cut in value of subsidies
Developed countries - 36 % (1995 - 2000) Developing countries - 24 % (1995 - 2004)
Cut in subsidised quantities
Developed countries - 21 % (1995 - 2000) Developing countries - 14 % (1995 - 2004)
(Base Period : (1986 - 1990)
To develop internationally agreed disciplines to govern
export credits, guarantees or insurance programmes.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
9/21
Doha Ministerial Conference
Fourth Ministerial Conference on WTO was held at Doha, Qatar
from 9-13th November 2001
This conference, inter alia, reviewed the progress of AoA negotiations
and provide guidelines for future.
The Ministers at Doha committed themselves to negotiation aimed atsubstantial improvement in market access, substantial reduction in
trade distorting domestic support and gradual phasing out of export
subsidies.
The special and differential treatment - an integral part of the
mandated agricultural negotiations.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
10/21
India Seeks
Protecting our food and livelihood security by having sufficientflexibility for domestic policy measures.
Protecting domestic producers from the surge in imports or
significant decline in import prices.
Substantial reduction in export subsidies and domestic support to
agriculture in the developed countries for greater market access to
products of developing countries.
Finally, a more equitable & fair trading framework for
agricultural commodities
MARKET ACCESS ISSUES CAN NOT BE SEEN IN ISOLATIONTO SUBSIDY REGIME
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
11/21
Present Stage of NegotiationsThe third phase of negotiations ended in March-
2003.As per original schedule, the modality of the
Agreement were to be established by 31.03.2003.
The deadline for establishment of Modality has
been missed
In the last one year a number of drafts for
establishment of Modality have been proposedThe major drafts include, Harbinsons original
and revised draft, US-EU combined draft, Original
Cancun Draft and the Derbez Text (Cancun revised
draft )
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
12/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
The Cancun Ministerial failed to arrive at any
agreement on modality for agriculture.
There was no willingness on part of developed
countries to recognize the genuine concerns of the
developing countries, especially in agricultureThe US & EU attempted to drive their own agenda,
at the expense of Doha Declaration
The concerns of the developing countries wereexpressed by a group viz. G-20 at Cancun.
India, China, Brazil, Argentina and South Africa
were the moving spirits behind the formation of this
Grou .
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
13/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
Some of important features of the two Harbinson
Drafts are as follows:
Includes the crucial numbers. Framework
proposes modalities.
Tariff reduction higher than Uruguay Round,using the concept of average and minimal
reductions based on tariff bands.
Introduction of a new concept of Special Productsfor developing countries, average tariff reduction
on SP to be at 10%, and minimum reduction, 5%.
Introduction of Safeguard Mechanism for
develo in countries.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
14/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
Reduction mainly in the amber box support bydeveloped countries.
Reduction in the De-minimis support for
developed countriesProposals only to discipline the Blue Box
payments, no reduction.
Proposals to tighten the criteria for Green Boxpayments for developed countries, expansion of
Green Box for developing countries
Elimination of direct export subsidies over a
longer period. Indirect subsidies; no final proposal
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
15/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
The S&D for the developing countries remains on
the lines as Uruguay Round.
The S&D for developing countries include, amarginally lower rate of tariff reduction, a longerimplementation period, provision of SpecialProducts with lower tariff reduction, provision ofSafe guard mechanism, retention of provisions atpara 6.2 of the present AoA, with possible wideningand retention of de-minimus in Amber Box Support
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
16/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
The US-EU draft, and the two Cancun drafts aresimilar in nature and their main features are:
The drafts propose only a framework. They dont
indicate the key numbersAggressive reductions in tariff by using a hybrid
formula. Swiss formula to be a component of the
hybrid formulaReduction for developing countries also to be by
same formula, with lower final commitment.
SPs to be limited in numbers.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
17/21
Present Stage of NegotiationsReduction mainly in the amber box support by developed
countries.
Reduction in the De-minimis support for developedcountries.
Capping of product specific support in Amber Box
Expansion of Blue box by inclusion of direct payments.
Capping of the expenditure under new Blue Box, with a
possible phased reduction over the implementation period.
No reduction in Green Box payments. The criteria for
Green Box payments may possibly be reviewed.
Reduction commitments for developing countries lower
with longer implementation period.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
18/21
Present Stage of Negotiations
The provisions of Article 6.2 to be continued.The de-minimus for the developing countries to be
retained at 10%.
Elimination of export subsidies over an extendedperiod during the implementation period.
The trade distorting elements of export credit to be
similarly treated.
No specific timeframe for elimination suggested.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
19/21
Indias stand on various drafts
The drafts fail to recognize the inter-linkages inthe three pillars of AoA.
The reductions suggested in domestic support are
minimal, as compared to the steep reduction intariff included in the Draft.
The drafts fail to recognize the food security and
livelihood concerns of the developing countries.The drafts are not meeting the spirit of Doha
Development Agenda.
e e opmen s os anc n n s er a
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
20/21
eve opmen s os - ancun n s er a
The G-20 has survived the pressures of the
developed countries and almost remained united on
agriculture issues.
The Cancun process led to loss of confidence of
developing countries in the developed countries.
The negotiations have formally not yet started atGeneva.
The stress, at present is more on arriving at
bilateral understandings.G-20 had bi-laterals with EU, one in Brazil and
other in Geneva.
India has had separate bilateral discussions with
USA as well as EU.
-
7/30/2019 Wto-State of Play Dec-03
21/21
Thank You