written evidence from ganesh sit tampa lam
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
1/6
FOI104WrittenevidencefromGaneshSittampalam
Executivesummary1. IamanindividualrequesterwithsignificantexperienceofusingtheAct.2. IbelievethattheActhasbeenverysuccessfulinopeningupaccesstopublicauthorities.3. InthissubmissionImainlyfocusonaspectsoftheActthatcouldbeimproved.4. HousesofParliament:itshouldbemadeclearthattheActisintendedtoapplytotheHousesof
Parliamentduringtheperiodofageneralelection.5. BBC:theBBCsderogationfromtheActforjournalisticmaterialshouldbereplacedbya
properlydraftedexemption.6. Promptness:ItshouldbemadeclearthattheexistingrequirementintheActforaprompt
responseisimportantandenforceable.7. Timelimits:Timelimitsshouldbeintroducedforpublicinteresttestsandforinternalreviews.8. Enforcement: TheCommissionerhasadequateenforcementpowersandshouldbeencouraged
tousethemmoreeffectively.9. Costslimit:thecurrentframeworkforestimatingcostsisworkingadequatelyandtampering
withitwouldbringsignificantcomplications.
Aboutthesubmitter10. IhavemadeFOIrequeststoarangeofpublicauthoritiestoobtainbackgroundmaterialona
rangeofaspectsofpublicpolicyandpublicadministrationthatinterestme.11. IhavemadeanumberofcomplaintstotheCommissionerandalsosuccessfullybroughtasmall
numberofcasestotheInformationTribunal,soIhaveagoodunderstandingofallstagesoftheFOIprocessfromtheperspectiveofarequester.
12. IamalsoavolunteeradministratorfortheWhatDoTheyKnow.comwebsiteandhavecontributedtoaseparatejointsubmissionmadeonbehalfofthatwebsite.ThissubmissionismadeinmypersonalcapacitybasedonmyownindividualexperiencesofusingtheAct.
ThebenefitsoftheAct13. IbelievethattheActhasbroughtaboutasubstantialshiftintherelationshipbetween
interestedcitizensandpublicauthorities.Itisnolongernecessarytorelyontheinformationanauthoritychoosestoputout,oronthepress,togainanunderstandingofthebehaviourofthepublicsector.
14.TheActprovidesaccesstointernalguidancethatcanbeveryhelpfulinexplainingpracticalaspectsofdailylife.Inonerecentrequest,IwasabletogetTransportforLondonsdefinitionsofwhatismeantbygoodserviceandminordelaysontheTube1,whichprovidesavaluableperspectiveonproblemsIseeinmydailycommute!
1http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/84798/response/248309/attach/3/Declaring%20Service%20Statu
s%20Criteria%20v1%206%2011%2011%2011.pdf
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
2/6
FOI10415.Accesstointernalinformationcanoftenshowauthoritiesinagoodlight,correctingmisleading
impressionsfrompressstories.ForexampleafteranarticleinthepressthatKentPolicehad
confiscatedaboardgameduringaraidonaClimateCamp,aFOIrequestestablishedthatthis
hadbeendonebecausethegamewasknowntocontainabalaclavawhichcouldbeusedto
concealidentities.2
ProblemswiththeActHousesofParliamentduringdissolution16.TheHouseofCommonshasasomewhatuniquelegalpositionbecauseofitshistory.Duringa
dissolutionforageneralelection,ittechnicallydoesnotexistatall.
17.TheCommonsauthoritieshavechosentousethisasareasontodelayansweringrequestsduringaperiodofadissolution
3,eventhoughthestaffwhowouldanswertheserequests
continueto
be
employed
throughout
this
period.
18.ThisisdespitethefactthatinapreviouscasebeforetheInformationTribunal,theCommonsauthoritiesexplicitlyacknowledgedthattheydidnotthinkthiswastheintentionofParliament:
4
Forexample,theHouseassumesthatParliamentdidnotintendthatthepublicsrightto
informationfromtheHouseissuspendedduringperiodswhentheHouseisdissolvedeven
though,asmentionedabove,theHouseofCommonsdoesnotexistduringsuchperiods.
19.TheperiodofageneralelectionisoneinwhichthepublichasaparticularinterestintheworkoftheCommons,anditisthereforeregrettablethattheauthoritieshavechosentobeobstructive
in
this
regard.
20.ThepositionoftheHouseofLordsisevenmoreambiguousasLordsdonotlosetheirstatusduringadissolution.
21. IbelieveastraightforwardfixtotheActtoremedythiswouldbetolisttheCorporateOfficerofeachHouseaspublicauthorities.
BBCderogation22.TheBBChasaderogationwhichmeanstheyareonlysubjecttotheActinrespectof
informationheldforpurposesotherthanthoseofjournalism,artorliteraturethespecial
purposes.
23. ItisrightthattheBBCbeexemptedfromreleasinginformationthatisdirectlypartofitsjournalisticandcreativeactivities.Butthelawisbadlydraftedinthisareaandisbeingabusedby
theBBCtoobstructscrutinyofitsspending.
24.ForexampletheBBChastriedtousethederogationtorefusemeinformationaboutthemoneyspentonmarketing,pressandpublicity.Requestsmadebyothersabouthowmanystaffwere
senttotheBeijingOlympicshavealsobeenrefused.
25.ThesekindsofrequestsfocusmuchmoreonthegeneraluseofpublicmoneyratherthanthedetailsoftheBBCscreativeoutput,andIbelievethisshouldbeproperlyopentoscrutiny.
2http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/confiscation_of_property 3
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/new_members_guidebook#incoming
86639
4Appeals EA/2006/0074/0075/0076: http://www.informationtribunal.gov.uk/DBFiles/Decision/i84/HoC2.pdf ,
para38
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
3/6
FOI10426.ThedraftingofthederogationhasledtotwosuccessiveHouseofLords/SupremeCourtappeals
inrespectofasinglerequestmadebythelateStevenSugar,thefirsttoestablishtherightroute
ofappealwhentheCommissionerdecidesthatrequestedinformationisnotsubjecttotheAct,
andthesecondtoclarifyhowinformationheldbothforthespecialpurposesandforother
purposesshould
be
treated.
27.Thecurrentsituation,pendingthefinalSupremeCourtruling,isthatifinformationisheldtoanyextentforthespecialpurposes,thenitisnotcovered.
28. Isuggestthatthederogationbereplacedbyanormalexemptionandtheambiguityresolvedtomakeitclearthatinformationisonlyexemptifheldjustforthespecialpurposes.Failingthatthe
testtheCommissioneroriginallyformulatedofadominantpurposeshouldberestored.
Promptness29.Section10oftheActstatesthatauthoritiesmustrespondtorequestspromptlyandinany
eventnotlaterthanthetwentiethworkingdayfollowingthedateofreceipt.
30.DuringParliamentarydebatesbeforetheActwaspassed,itwasexplicitthatthiswasintendedtobeanenforceableright
5:
theCommissionermayserveadecisionnoticeoranenforcementnoticeonanauthority
whichfailedtodealwitharequestforinformationpromptly,eventhoughitdealtwithit
within40days
[the40dayswassubsequentlyreducedto20]
31. IthasunfortunatelyprovedalmostimpossibletorelyonthispartoftheAct.32. InonerequesttotheDepartmentofCulture,MediaandSportwhenIcomplainedabout
promptness,theyrespondedthat6
UndertheFreedomofInformationActwearerequiredtorespondwithin20workingdays,
whichyouacceptwedid.PreviouscaseswhichhavebeentotheInformationCommissioner
withasimilarargumenttotheoneyououtlinehavebeenrejectedasitisunderstoodthat
wedohave20workingdaystorespond
33.ThisattitudedoesindeedextendtotheCommissioner.InresponsetoacomplaintabouttheCabinetOfficespromptness,theICOscaseofficerclaimed
TheAct
provides
an
explicit
timetable
in
which
public
authorities
must
respond
to
a
request.Iunderstandyourfrustrationinnotreceivinganearlierresponsewithoutdelay,
however,theresponsewasprovidedinaccordancewiththetimetableprovidedbytheAct.
34. IbelievethatthisisaclearexamplewheretheActisnotoperatingasintended.Failuretoenforcethisrequirementmeansthatmanyauthoritiesroutinelywaitthefull20workingdaysto
respondeventotrivialrequests.
35.Thisisparticularlydamagingincaseswheretheauthoritysresponseistosimplyrefertherequestertoanotherauthority,aswasthecasewithmyrequesttotheCabinetOffice.Inthis
5http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmpubadm/570/57015.htm
6http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/public_cost_of_royal_family_and#incoming 69707
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
4/6
FOI104instancetheyreferredmetotheTreasurywhoalsodidnotholdtheinformationandafteryet
moredayswaiting,sentmeontoHMRCwhoactuallydidholdit.
36.Thefailuretobepromptactuallyhasaknockoneffectonauthoritiesaswellasrequesters:becauseresponseswillprobablybeslow,thereisanincentivetoframebroaderrequeststhan
strictlynecessary
rather
than
making
asmall
initial
request
and
following
up
as
necessary.
37.Similarlyifmultiplepublicbodiesmightholdinformation,itcurrentlyseemsbettertoaskallofthemforitinthefirstinstance,ratherthantotrythemostlikelyfirst.
38.AstherequirementforpromptnessisalreadyenshrinedintheAct,andthemainproblemisthatitisnotbeingtakenseriouslybyeitherauthoritiesortheCommissioner,Ibelievethesituation
couldbeimprovedbyaclearstatementfromlegislatorsthattheybelievethattherequirement
forpromptnessisimportantandshouldbeenforced.
Timelimits39.ThelackoftimelimitsintheActforpublicinteresttestsandforinternalreviewsisafrequent
pointof
friction
with
authorities.
40.Thereislittleornoevidencethatauthoritiesgenuinelyneedthisflexibility.41.ThepositioninScotland,withnoextensionforthepublicinteresttestanda40workingdaylimit
forinternalreviews,providesanalternativemodelfortheUKtofollow.
Poorlyorganisedauthorities42.SomeauthoritiesseemtoconsistentlyhavedifficultymeetingtheirobligationsundertheAct.In
mypersonalexperiencetheseincludetheCabinetOfficeandtheHomeOffice.
43.MetarequestsrequestsforinformationabouthowapreviousFOIrequestwashandledsuggestthatforthemostpartlongdelayedrequestsreceivelittleattentionforweeksata
time.7, 8
44.Oftentheseauthoritiesseemtospendsubstantiallymoretimeonlookingforreasonstorefuseordelayarequestthanonactuallyprovidingananswer.
45.Forexample,inrulingagainstanattemptbytheHomeOfficetodeclarearequestfrommevexatious,theCommissionerobserved
9:
WhiletheHomeOfficehasmadeconsiderablerepresentationsabouttheadditionalworkit
hasundertakenfollowingthecomplainantsrequests,mostofthisworkwasincurredasa
resultofthewaytheHomeOfficehandledtherequests.
46.Difficultiesansweringrequestssometimesalsoappeartooriginatefromextraordinarilypoorrecordsmanagement.TheHomeOfficeisapparentlyunabletoprovidecopiesof16contracts
theysignedwiththeACPOin2009/10withinthecostslimit10:
7
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/32334/response/90755/attach/3/FOI%2014618%2010%2006%20
10.pdf8
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/48265/response/207601/attach/3/20110822%20Sittampalam%20Digest%20Release.docx9http://www.ico.gov.uk/~/media/documents/decisionnotices/2011/fs_50380320.ashx ,paragraph25
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
5/6
FOI104Locatingandcollatingthisinformationwouldinvolveretrievingdocumentationfrom
variousotherunitsintheHomeOfficeCrimeandPolicingGroup(CPG),duetothefactthat
thetotalfundingamountisnotcentrallyheld.CPGconsistsofover23unitsamountingto
over100individuals.Thisworkwouldmeancollatinginformationthroughsearching
differentinformation
sources
(namely
23
shared
electronic
drives,
personal
drives
and
separatepaperrecords)heldbyeachunit.
47.GiventhatthesearelegaldocumentsandalsothattheGovernmentstatedin2010thatallcontractswithvaluesofmorethan25,000shouldberoutinelypublished,Ifinditveryhardto
understandwhythesearenotkeptinacentrallocation.
TheInformationCommissioner48.SubstantialdelaysininvestigatingcomplaintsbytheInformationCommissionerhavebeenwell
documentedinthepast.
49.Thesedelayshavenowbeenreducedbutarestillsignificant:itstilltypicallytakes612monthstogetadecisionaboutanysubstantivecomplaint.
50.ThisagaincontrastswiththepositioninScotlandwherethelegislationsetsatargetof4monthsfortheScottishCommissioner.
11
51.Oneconsequenceisthatanyauthoritythatwantstodelaythereleaseoftimesensitiveinformationcaneasilydoso.
52.TheCommissioneralreadyhassubstantialpowerstotakeactionagainstpersistentlypoorlyperformingauthorities.
53.Hiscurrentapproachonlyfocusesontheabsoluteworstperformersandisratherprotracted;authoritieswhicharealreadydemonstrablyfailingarefirstmonitoredformanymoremonths,
thenifstill
failing
are
persuaded
to
sign
undertakings
and
monitored
for
afurther
substantial
period.NonewauthoritieshavebeenplacedundermonitoringsinceApril2011.
54. IbelievetheCommissionershouldusehispowersmuchmoreaggressively,andissueenforcementnoticeswheneverapatternofpoorperformanceemerges.
Thecostslimit55.TheMoJsmemorandumhighlightsthatanumberofpublicauthoritieswouldliketoseechanges
totheoperationofthecostslimit,inparticulartoincluderedaction,consultationandreading
time.
56.Currently,themeasureoftimeforthecostslimitisfairlyobjectiveinthatitonlycomprisesthetimerequiredforwelldefinedandlimitedactivities locating,retrievingandextracting
information.EvensothereareoftendisputesbeforetheCommissioneraboutthe
reasonablenessofsuchestimates.
57.Addingmoreactivitiesparticularlyconsultationandreading wouldintroduceamuchmoresubjectiveelementwhichwouldlikelyleadtoasignificantincreaseinsuchdisputes.
58. Includingredactiontimewouldcreateanincentiveforauthoritiestomaintaininformationinformswherereleasableinformationisintermingledwithexemptinformation.
10
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/53125/response/228394/attach/3/16988%20Sittampalam%20response.pdf,paragraph1811
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2002/13/section/49
-
8/3/2019 Written Evidence From Ganesh Sit Tampa Lam
6/6
FOI10459.Measuringtherequiredredactiontimeisalsoproblematicbecauseitpresupposesthatan
exemptionreallydoesapplybutthatmaybeamatterofdispute.
60. Inthecurrentregime,thefirststepinhandlingarequestistotestthecostslimit,andonlyiftheinformationcanbeextracted,toconsiderothermoresubstantiveexemptions.
61.Thissimpletwostageprocesswouldbeenormouslycomplicatediftheapplicationofsubstantiveexemptionshadtobeconsideredintandemwiththeapplicationofthecostslimit.
62.Forexample,IhaveobtainedthereleaseoftheBBCscontractwithCapitatooperateTVlicensing.
12ThiscontractrunstoseveralhundredpagesandtheBBCinitiallysoughttowithhold
significantpartsofit,withmanysmallredactions.EventuallytheInformationCommissioner
orderedreleaseofthewholedocumentwithoutanyredactionsatall.
63. Ibelievethatchangestothecalculationofthecostlimitwouldmakeobtainingdocumentsofthisnatureharderorimpossible.Particularlygiventhecurrenttrendstowardsoutsourcing,
accesstosuchcontractsisinmyviewvitaltounderstandinghowpublicservicesarerun.
February2012
12http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/tv_licensing_contracts_with_capi#incoming 171072