w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "b" type compliance — a routine nonsampling...

13
w:~~r..~ :~~ ;~ ~, ~_' ~ ? kw:: : . ,;: k .~ v ,,~: i r '~~ ~~ntral V~Iley Region Katherine Hart, Chair 1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706 Linda S. Adams (559) 445-5116 •FAX (559) 445-5910 cting Secretary for http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley Cnvironmental Protecfron 6 June 2011 Mr. Larry Bright Valley Waste Disposal Company 7500 Meany Ave. Bakersfield, CA 93308 Edmund G. Brown Jr. Governor -`~ { ~ ~ ° U ~ lei ~ G~I~ ~~ '~~ ~ 1_~'~` ~~~~A~ ~ ~ fllS~~~AL~ Enclosed are copies of two inspection reports, one for the Edison Race Track Hiil Section 24 wastewater disposal facility and the other for the Edison Section 34 C -Plant wastewater receiving facility. The inspections were conducted by Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board staff on 13 May 2011. The Section 24 disposal facility is regulated by Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. 58-349 and the Section 34 receiving facility is regulated by WDRs Order No. 92-11037. No violations were observed during the inspections. If you have any questions, please call Jim Dowdall of this office at (559) 445-5108 or by email at jdowdall .waterboards.ca.gov. ,~ V~ ~~ ~ AMES K. DOWDALL Engineering Geologist Professions! Geologist #4830 Enclosures 1 SHELTON R. GRAY Senior Engineering Geologist cc: California Division of Oil, Gas &Geothermal Resources, Bakersfield California Department of Fish and Game, Fresno Kern County Environmental Health Department, Bakersfield California Environmental Protection ~4gency ~aRecyc/ed Paper

Upload: others

Post on 14-Mar-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

w:~~r..~:~~ ;~

~, ~_'~?kw:::. ,;:k.~ v ,,~:

i r '~~~~ntral V~Iley Region

Katherine Hart, Chair

1685 E Street, Fresno, California 93706Linda S. Adams (559) 445-5116 •FAX (559) 445-5910cting Secretary for http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley

Cnvironmental Protecfron

6 June 2011

Mr. Larry BrightValley Waste Disposal Company7500 Meany Ave.Bakersfield, CA 93308

Edmund G. Brown Jr.Governor

-`~

{

~ ~ ° U ~ lei ~ G~I~~~

'~~ ~ 1_~'~` ~~~~A~ ~ ~ fllS~~~AL~

Enclosed are copies of two inspection reports, one for the Edison Race Track HiilSection 24 wastewater disposal facility and the other for the Edison Section 34 C-Plantwastewater receiving facility. The inspections were conducted by Central ValleyRegional Water Quality Control Board staff on 13 May 2011. The Section 24 disposalfacility is regulated by Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Order No. 58-349 andthe Section 34 receiving facility is regulated by WDRs Order No. 92-11037. Noviolations were observed during the inspections.

If you have any questions, please call Jim Dowdall of this office at (559) 445-5108 or byemail at jdowdall .waterboards.ca.gov.

,~ V~ ~~ ~

AMES K. DOWDALLEngineering GeologistProfessions! Geologist #4830

Enclosures

1

SHELTON R. GRAYSenior Engineering Geologist

cc: California Division of Oil, Gas &Geothermal Resources, BakersfieldCalifornia Department of Fish and Game, FresnoKern County Environmental Health Department, Bakersfield

California Environmental Protection ~4gency

~aRecyc/ed Paper

Page 2: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

~FFIC` '.!O: 5F '~ 1CILITIES INSPECTION ~~r~nspEctor: ~KD - REPORT 4.

Program Type: SUB15

5D152013013 Valley Waste Disposal Company Edison y~-~`_ WDID NUMQER PARTY NAME PLACE NAME —~-

58-349 7500 IVleany Ave. Section 24, T29S, R29EWDR ORDER NO STREET STREET

142624 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Kern CountyREG MEASURE ID CITY AND STAI"E CITY AND STATE

Larry Bright Larry Bright05/13/2011 CONTACT PERSON UNSITE CONTACT PERSON

ACTua~ INSP o,aTE(MM/DD/YYYY) (661) 410-7500 (661 410-7500J

PHONE NO PHONE NO

Place ID: 222241

P31'tY (D: 49654 __ ~f this inspoction is a Compliance inspection of an NPUGS facility, send a copy of this report to SWRCB s Div~sron of Water Quality, Program Support Unit

INSPECTION TYPE (Check One)

"A" type compliance —Comprehensive inspection in which samples are taken. (EPA Type S}

"B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C)

Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously identified violation.

Enforcement follow-up —Inspection made to verify that conditions of an enforcEment action are being met.

Complaint —Inspection made in response to a complaint.

Pre-requirement —Inspection made to gather information relative to preparing, modifying, or rescinding requirements.

Miscellaneous —Any inspection type not mentioned above.

If this is an EPA inspection not mentioned above, please note type.{e.g. — biomonitoring, perFormance audit, diagnostic, etc)

(Type)

N Were VIOLATIONS noted during this inspection? (Yes/No/Pending Sample Results)

N Was this a Quality Assurance-Based Inspection? (YeslNo)

N Were bioassay samples taken? (Yes/No) (If yes, then Static or Flowthrough)

Y INSPECTION SUMMARY (REQUIRED) (500 character limit)

ON 13 MAY 2011, I (JIM DOWDALL) INSPECTED THE VALLEY WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY EDISON RACE TRACKHILL SECTION 24 FACILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. 58-349. NOVIOLATIONS WERE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION.

~~ECTOR'S DATA:

~~aff ID: JKD S}GNATURE:

.~

(~) ~-'U'~~ (2)

DATE 16 May 2011

_ t3~CIWQS Coordinator

C1WQS Inspection ID~

For Internal Use: Reviewed by:

CIWQS Entry Date' Regional Board File Number:

Page 3: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

FAC1LITiES INSPECTION~, REPORT

' Page 2

Date Occurred (MM/DDIYYYY}:

DESCRIPTION (2000 Character Limit):

• ~ • ~'~ •

Date Determined (MM/DD/YYYY):

EPA SUGGESTED CHECKLIST(S=Satisfactory, M=Marginal, U=Unsausfaclory. N=Not Evaluaiedj

S Permit N Flow Measurement N Pretreatment S Operations and Maintenance

ComplianceN Records/Reports N Laboratories N Schedules N Sludge Disposal

S Facility Site Review N Eff./Receiving Waters N Self-Monitoring N Other

MOST RECENT ORDERS:

ORDER NO.DATEADOPTED TYPE

58-349 9!18/1958 WDRS

5 Overall Facility Operation Evaluation (5=Very reliable, 3=Satisfactory, 1=Unreliable)

HISTORICAL INFORMATION

MOST RECENT INSPECTIONS:

DATE TYPE VtOLATtONS?06/02/2006 61 N04/26/2007 B1 N05/Q912008 B 1 N05/21/2009 B1 N05/06/2010 B1 N

MOST RECENT VIOLATIONS:

VIOLATION ID DATE

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, SPECIAL 1~1STRUCTIONS, ITEMS FOR FOLLOWUP ONFUTURE INSPECTIONS, NOTES, ETC. (Attach additional pages, if necessary}

The purpose of the inspection was to determine if the facility was being operated in compliance with Waste DischargeRequirements (WDRs) Order No. 58-349. The facility is located in the northwest quarter and a portion of the southwest quarter of

Section 24, T29S, R29E, MDB&M (see attached Rio Bravo Range Quadrangle Map}. I was accompanied on the inspection by

Larry Bright of Va{ley Waste Disposal Company. Approximately 9,000 barrels per day of produced oilfield wastewater is entering

the facility from the Valley Waste Disposal Company Race Track Hill C-Plant in Section 34, T29S, R29E, MDB&M.

Photos were taken during the inspection and are included an this report. Also included in the report is a general map of the facility

layout showing where the photos were taken.

Ito 1 shows the first Entry Pond A. The entry ponds were free of oil. A coyote was seen running up the hill shown in the

background in Photo 1. Three entry ponds and 23 out of 24 impoundments were in use. TF~e impoundments are located in three

canyons (South Canyon, Middle Canyon, and North Canyon) in the W '/~ of Section 24, T29S, R29E, MDB&M. The canyons are

shown on the attached quadrangle map.

Page 4: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

FACILITIES 1SPECTIOIV REPORT ~"(Page 3)

~A~ 2 shows South Canyon Impoundment 1 where nine mallards (green-headed ducks) were spotted. The ducks moved to the,_ . of the impoundment and are not apparent in the photo. One mallard was also spotted in South Canyon Impoundment 2.Photo 3 shows Middle Canyon Impoundment 6 where a mother duck and ducklings were present but are not apparent in thephoto. Photo 4 provides a view of Middle Canyon Impoundment 11. Photos 5 and 6 are of North Canyon Impoundments 13 and17, respectively. A mother duck and eight ducklings were spotted in Impoundment 13 and are apparent in the photo inside theyellow circle. All the impoundments had adequate freeboard and were free of oil. No odors were evident during the inspection.

Some of the North Canyon impoundments (side canyon Impoundments 21, 22, 23, 24) may contain some runoff water. Somecattle were observed grazing on the facility.

The access road to Middle Canyon Impoundments 11 and 12 that had been repaired in 2009 was in good condition with noerosion or vegetative growth obstructing the road. The smaller erosion rills noted in last year's inspection on the slopes west ofthese impoundments were filled in with thick vegetation, helping to prevent any further erosion.

The sprinkler system, that included old aluminum irrigation piping, was not in operation since the old piping is being replaced withnew irrigation piping. The new irrigation pipe consists of smaller diameter, flexible black plastic piping that appears to blend in andbe less noticeable in the environment. When in operation, the sprinkler system is used to enhance the evapotranspirationcapability of the facility by spraying gravity fed wastewater from the impoundments on~the vegetation on the hillsides.

No violations were observed during the inspection. The operation of the facility appeared to be in compliance with the WDRs.

Page 5: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

t

UNITED STATES RIO BRAVO RANCH ClUADRANGLE: ~a,~,+°

~ ~. DEPARTMENT GF THE INTERIOR ca4.;FCRN!A -riFRN ,.o y ~'

~• OEULOGICAL SURVEY 7r M:NUTE SERIES tfOPOGRA!' i,.i :'~'

718'i. 7I~C 7f ~'31~ Ni' 'H *a5 ~~wi~~v% - -, x y ~ y~ I: N•~S

_ _ _ ,Ti •> a a a a. ac

' ~ .

.—w ~ ., _I

..~ ,~ ~ ~ t y4.tl ~ ~~. '~~~ ` ~,{ ~/ }` ~ .+~ yr°~! '~ T\y ~~ r~ ~ ~/ ~ ll i r~ ~ ~'i ~ ~ r' J Ise

37 ~ lb a""''' ~ TS :'~ ~ 'v i l.v b

14; ..., ~ _~~ tt ~ 18 _~~ - ~ -37 ~ ~ ,.':

r, ~ w`J ~ ,'. \' ~.~ ,_,~-y ' '-..,:~ ' 7 ,.~ fix:. e '•1, ; 'i' ~.-, t- .~ ~ -, i } '~

''_ ''I _1___ ~ '1~+r.# .-/~.___ ~. _____'_..y. _ j _ ~ ~ art-'_ ~ _''1 .___- T,'m'i .__ ___ .f e -- xw ~'^__ _ _ - ..

~ j` ~ L~~ rte' ~` .,F~ ~ ~ I' t=

,SI - I t i ~ ~ f~ ' /f f / i ~ . \ j , .~~'~ya ~" ~ _ % ~ r\~ ~ - ~ j

1. , - \ ` ~

-"~ ~ /~' t~~~ ~ ;aa ~ i ' r

.36. ^- =y ~ ~ , • 21 ',1 ' ~~i U !'' ~ +~2 ~ -,' ~ 2 J~~=._•~`'.,-.%~ 2,t f - i ~ ' / _ ~ S _ E , Q' LT ' ~ r

. ~

~Li

~a, ~ ice-. J - '~ ~.. ! ~ '~ ~ i ~> ~ i \ =_~~ r ~ 3 / i i ~ , .

q J'

~ ~ ~ c. `~" i o '`tip ~ ~ ~ ~^--- l'r^~, l{ ~ t .,~5, • t ~- - e ~ ~ .. t. . .

( i' ' .,t 11' :ir

~~_~ ~~ ~--...-✓~%%-.f ~ y ~~ ~ C 't3 L`~ T" I ,E3 ti A ~~'. - ~' i~c

~ ~~ ~ 7.. ~xt ,` $~ 4 j- f•. ~, •gin J •-~~~ z ' (,~ ! ) ^c6 ~ r _ ; _ 2S /., I ~ F ~ `29 _ c.f~~ 28, Ji

~' ~' t i ~ , i ~ ~ ~ , ~ _ ~ .tea s r''m~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ''~~ r J ~ ~.:' -~ - ~{ +r tie i i.0 ~ -- I

~_ ~ ~

~2 ~ ~ . 3g',. i ~ `34' r T 3S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ 3b _ ~. ; (' ~ ~Y fi r. ~ , ~ I' - ~2 ... t -34

c

~ ,s,.~..~..,., f~ _~ ~e ~ 7

.~ ff ` ~ P

s~~~ fkS}!Ns IVk:H ~ ~~ ,t /d~ '~` ..~d ~„- ~ ~ ._ _i , I r '""'

~~i _ 8 vT~A:.L' ~C~' v P. li "F . ~ ~ ~ '~ A ` ~ W:~ ~' ~ ~ ~~+' ~ 4., - l Y - -~._ '7 E

2 _ 2 ~ a - i• !~ _ b

. •v 4 *-~ j ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~ ' ~' ~' '~~ y~ ~7 ~.~ ~g `1 , ti S _ ; r». 1 j 3 I?~

~~ • •ate_ t~ ~.~' ,_... -..~ ~ -~ ~.-~ ~~~~ ~c'''~ ,~,>~~ - ~ , i~-

_ _

~~

:.i ~` ~ ~ ,~ ~ g~, ~ fit:

~ `~ ~- ~~`..._...r___ mss"_ ~#~"O~~ .. " .~~'' ~ . \ ._ _ '

.9 10 ; 11 ee a ~ /

~-. _ ~ ~ i'

,..•'

X01 , , ~~ f, ~ .....

i ,_ ' ~ ~ ~ _ T ~~~,,,. ~,o''

• ~ .~ r~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~~ Location of roll ;\ ~ y ~ _ S r

'A ,,'~ ., _ lfatiey YITBste Disposal Com~yl'', ~ _ _ ~ { -- ~~ - ..•, ; ~', 'm j ~a

~ I 16 ; -R~~Cg Track HillArea ~ '3 ~ ~ ~ ~1g

~i / K '~+~ ~ ~~ lg Seciio~ 24; T29S, R29E, MI~BBfY! ,. * j ~; -: ~ ~

.L~ . ~, t ~

..~

.' .. U JI "IE~.D S ♦ ~N( I~LI

f~~

r - — ---.,r*, b t _ — -ry,;-- _ ___ - - _ -:ate ~3~' ,~' Hun unym ` ~ ~

' J ~~.s y

t

-'- _

., ., ~s:~

~y' .: if ~ -- ,~ 2d -~,.' 19 - i 2C ~ ..1 .- ~Y.k 2

2i :~ ~ 22 .~ ~ '-23 i ~. ..~ ."'t' AY r' _ ~. ~.' _ ,i, ~.i "9'~: ~p

i, -•... ,, t ,;.. .'^~

F 1

..

.. n'~: U ~ r.c, - -- ui~ — ..- -, .:w ~ ~ ., ~, t.,y~ ,~, :rw itmov, a T .. Tn o ?n7 a7„~y, -;;~ ti ,'~j. w,~[ ink ,i t

5~~ Mapped edited and pub!iN[4 6y tAe GeUbgical Surrey SGLE t 240 0

+des ~ p r+~e FGAJ .lA>n4i'~1~i;N

~9~ t L ~lr I u. ~iit FCL."a3 s ~t~s::c r ~' er -L~~~-e~T#. ~ Ts'~ .. :. _ ~ ~ -,, ,..

?W &A 1 eiui tx~i~~ :F. Cr 'ILO' ern+M. ~~ yo IooP ao fem aJtA `Jm rret HaT'Y ~'+h

A 1 t: ~e l4 F ~.~stM 1954 ~~ I .r[iu Me6iv~n3uY ..•—~ - - U .-.M ~.:t ,..-...

'G`y~ ~ I ~ ~t.0 727 N th A~nliKM CNYI~ 1 y.

:.3 'F. i.~l:L : ~'- 'i ~ r ~,

7 GEC x1 ,iF! L~ M .:a ~axk~n a c:~x: nib :re!e + :.~..r .. 1f i~i i ~ ~ ~•• C6NTOUP INTEA'Al 4P f EET

~ f ~~.t~L1 Hqutr

OOO miter Un~wrultei~uwi~~Mermte~fr~d lkl~.

BRED IiNfS AC~MESCN MRlO1 CUH10YP3

/ AT~UN~L ::EODFTtL VEPtICM WTtIM OF 1929

ew 1 t. s~.awn ~n C:ue ~~

?o wra ~m me o~arcme owm a,.riran ou~m tern .,, ~ '~

a~nov~gK+~e~.s e,~w...~onnrx~ "c~c`~+;~u~:,,~~~u ...a. ~z ~ Rl0 BRAVO RANCH. CALIF

,w.86 rtww~. oast as Ycwn tr/ NyeW Cam~i tcka

ix:5 Wt CAM0..E5 WIfN NAi1pNN. MV KC~IiAGY StA 1Y1R05 W.weunal ~ ti~mp N !~I:.~-. W ; t9ai:! 5

~ ~~n ~ ~h ~~d,~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ fOR SAtE tlY LL 5. UE0t681('11l SUfiVEY, OEIIYEfl, COLOMW BO135. OP RESTON. YIP3IMU 2209: Ro.y~ers ~'A.+:::.i ~~..;.~~ :..r~.w: '..,n a, -i: , ...+~.. .~c`J

tM1t IM4nMI w 5b!~ Rf~MtlMf Y~ovn m Nis map A ftltOEN MSCFiNM4 TJ~WM~MiC WP5 ,WO 5Y4B61: 15 ~Yu.AEIE ON

PEdIRSi the.-.'s~:u+~.:+a ''.:~ "~aUeJ. rnC i~:t[y ~iD i",iw`~JNq Y15~ lY ilE-BtiR1Ef YeO~

Page 6: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

vi'~ L, i_ E y W A s r~ C~ 1 5 P~ 5 ~. L. C. o,

~.orS ON Rte. c cTR A. G K

P~ +~ G O ~- A T t D N `~'~

N

r ~ ~

1 #j

• "'

~ ~3

~•

~;.,. ~ —.:,.. .-.S7

.. ,~t y

~ LEGEND~~~-~ ~ For 73 May 201'1 Inspection

~~ i

Photo location,number, anddirection

~~-x Indicates entry~;ponds 8~ impoundmentsi n use

.. a

Located: On west side of Breckenridge Roadin the northwest quarter and portion of thesoutheast quarter of Section 24, T29S, R29E, I~1D~&IVt(see Rio Bravo Ranch Quadrangle Map)

Scale: 1 inch = 750 feet

Page 7: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

~ - 5 ( ~ ar

4 ; ~ r~ ~~ y ~~ mod. _

~ r

p" ,r ~~ ' 1

~a,, ',> •• ~e ~ y

" ~"1r ~ ~ ~ .` _M ~ » i ~./

. ~j' ~N~~,, ~;• (

F J~

15tt y, ~ ~; v .~r~<r,

?r

vt x ~

.} Mr+ r..~ ~.

T ~~

~~ ~ ~'

'i r

l

w C tC4 41~

~ a Y,

~ i ~ ~h ~

i 4 .:

x

Photo 1: View of Entry Pond Alooking westerly.

_ - ~ Y .~ ..

~~1

~.

( V:" ~' ' ~ ~ J'. ~. s' t ~ 1

i f'

-,t~' 4 Y ~, 1"y _A~ ~

•-~r

n. " II

R f~~- V

ms's _ ..J~' „S.i' y k4 .t /'x17` *

3

~ '~~ ~ r 1~ ~ ~ z..~~~ ~~ ~ .,' .,~ „

~.

~'~.~ ~ ~ ~,~~ ~ ~ -1' ~>

Y'y' s

-'.V ~~..~ i ~.. S':

aAf t n 4 '~ > ~, k~ ~G ,J~n - r q ~l

"'>;~.~ . -' p~ _motq., f ~ 5,:'~ s

'-- ~ ~

Photo 3: View of Impoundment 6looking northwesterly.

{ ~ ~

~ ~ fir, ~

} - f ~ J '7-' Ir V

~ ~1N {~ f

t

tS~ Y w ~

F yr ~ ' '~'' ~ ~ ¢ '-'-

~ T ~z~' ~~~ 'y~ ~ ~

~~ e ,F.u. ~ .. - ~~~ ~_

r

~. ~ ~ v

`~ ~'~.. ~>yS ''f .5.! 7~.' h ~J ll" l j

~~_f ~1~~y"i L 1„ v x -~ y'~. w eir ~~3 1 ~~ '~~ 4

Photo 5: View of Impoundment 13looking northwesterly.

z , ,qty t .: "'~4'+ x ''~'r a ,~ ~,,. 3 K,f

*_

y^ ~t

,,~ ~ ' ~

4f i~ '>,.~, ~s. 7 ,~`~~

...

T..

.,, y `T

t !~-

r ~ ~ ~ ~~ ...~C dpi Y~ ~$%~

_ ~ 7 ~

~~~gy~5~~~ir

Photo 2: View of Impoundment 1looking northeasterly.

Photo 4: View of Impoundment 11looking north.

Photo 6: View of Impoundment 17looking northwesterly.

VALLEY WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANYRACE TRACK HILLAREA

EDISON OIL FIELD13 MAY 2011 INSPECTION PHOTOS

Page 8: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

OFFICE NO: 5FInspector: JKD

~'~CIL(TIES INSPECTION- REPORT

c~v' j

Program Type: SUB15

5D159073001 Valley Waste Disposal Company Edison, Fee 34 ~ y ~,WDID NUMBER PARTY NAME PLACE NAME '~-

92-11037 7500 Meany Ave. SW'/4 of Section 34, T29S, R29EWDR ORDER NO STREET STREET

144517 Bakersfield, CA 93308 Kern CountyREG MEASURE Ip CITY AND STATE CITY AND STATE

_ 05!13/2011ACTUALIN5P DATE(MM/DD/YWY)

Place ID

Party ID

222263

Larry Bright Larry BrightCONTACT PERSON ONSITE CONTACT PERSON

(661) 410-7500 (661) 410-7500PHONE NO PHONE NO

49654 _ If this inspection is a Compliance Inspection of an NPDES facility, send a copy of this report to SWRCB's Division of Water Quality, Program Support Unit

INSPECTIt~IV TYPE (Check One)

"A" type compliance —Comprehensive inspection in which samples are taken. (EPA Type S)

"B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C)

Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously identified violation.

Enforcement follow-up —Inspection made to verify that conditions of an enforcement action are being met

Complaint —Inspection made in response to a complaint.

Pre-requirement —Inspection made to gather information relative to preparing, modifying, or rescinding requirements.

Miscellaneous —Any inspection type not mentioned above.

If this is an EPA inspection not mentioned above, please note type.(e.g. — biomonitoring, performance audit, diagnostic, etc}

(Type}

N Were VIOLATIONS noted during this inspection? (Yes/No/Pending Sample Results)

N Was this a Quality Assurance-Based Inspection? (YeslNo)

N Were bioassay samples taken? (Yes/No} (If yes, then Static or Flowthrough)

INSPECTIa SUMMARY (REQUIRED} (500 character limit)

ON 13 MAY 2011, I (JIM DOWDALL} INSPECTED THE VALLEY WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY EDISON FEE SECTION 34FACILITY FOR COMPLIANCE WITH WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. 92-11037. NO VIOLATIONSWERE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION.

'NSPECTOR'S DATA:

:aff ID: JKD

For Internal Use: Reviewed by:

SIGNATURE:

~~) ~~ CZ)

Regional Board File Number:

DATE 16 May 2011

(3)

CIWQS Entry Date: CIWQS Inspection 1D:CIWQS Coordinator

Page 9: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

F~4C1LITIES INSPECTION' ~. REPORT .,~,,;

Page 2

Date Occurred (MM/DD/YYYY):

DESCR1PTlON (2000 Character Limit):

S Permit

N Records/Reports

V(OLATIUN (IF APPLICABLE}

Date Determined (MM/DD/YYYY):

EPA SUGGESTED CHECKLIST ~~(S=Satisfactory, M=Marginal, U=Unsatisfactory, N=Not Evaluated)

N Flow Measurement

N Laboratories

S Facility Site Review N Eff./Receiving Waters

MOST RECENT ORDERS:

ORDER NO.DATEADOPTED TYPE

92-11 Q37 5/29/1992 WDRS

N Pretreatment S Operations and Maintenance

ComplianceN Schedules N Sludge Disposal

N Seif-Monitoring N Other

5 Qverall Facility Operation Evaluation (5=Very reliable, 3=Satisfactory, 1=Unreliable)

HISTORICAL INFORMATION

MOST RECENT INSPECTIONS:

DATE TYPE VIOLATIONS?06/02/2006 B1 N04/26/2007 B1 N05/09/20U8 81 N05/21/2009 B1 N05106/2010 B1 N

MOST RECENT VIOLATIONS:

VIOLATION 1D DATE

ADDITIONAL COMIVIE[~TS, SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS, 1TEIVIS FOR FOLLOV'VUP ONFUTURE INSPECTIONS, NOTES, ETC. (Attach additional gages, if necessary}

The purpose of the inspection was to determine if the facility was being operated in compliance with Waste DischargeRequirements (WDRs) Order No. 92-11037. 1 was accompanied on the inspection by Larry Bright of Valley Waste DisposalCompany. Approximately 9,000 barrels per day of produced oilfield wastewater is entering the facility. The facility is located in aportion of the southwest quarter of Section 34, T29S, R29E, MDB&M (see attached Edison Quadrangle Map).

Photos were taken during the inspection and are included in this report. Also included in the report is a general map of the facilitylayout showing where the photos were taken.

photo 1 shows the facility eastern entrance gate that was locked as we arrived for the inspection. Labels on the entrance gaterw the facility operator and the current facility phone number. Vineyards are visible in the background in the photo. There are

a~so orange groves in the vicinity of the facility.

Photo 2 shows the entry point where the wastewater enters the facility. Photo 3 shows one of the sumps where the oil is skimmedfrom the entry sumps. The netting around the sumps appeared to be in good condition. Photo 4 shows the shipping pond. The

Page 10: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

FAC ILITIES IIVSPECTIDN REPUK 1• (Page 3)

turbine pumps at the far end of the shipping pond pump the wastewater approximately 3.5 miles to Valley Waste DisposalCompany's Edison Race Track Hill Facility located in Section 24, T29S, R29E, MDB&M, where it is disposed of in surface'm^oundments. Both of the float activated pumps were off at the time of the inspection due to the low fluid level in the shipping

There was a faint hydrocarbon odor but the odor was not noticeable until coming up near the eastern entry gate. The storm waterbasin shown on the facility layout map contained some runoff water from recent storm events. No violations were observed duringthe inspection. The operation of the facility appeared to be in compliance with the WDRs.

Page 11: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

V tr~t

g~, UNITED STATES EDtSON ~UADRAN(3LE ~?;~

~:'a DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STATE Of CALIFORNfA CALfFORNtA—%SRC+ CO. off°°~~ GEOLOC}ICAL 9f7RVEY ➢EPA171~dENT OF WATER RE30URGE3 7S MINUTE 6ER155 !TOPOGRAPHIC) ~`lIT3Y3d 3l s... ss rr ~ ~

$•1T]C~ W"`! ~~ ~_ . _ ~['.ar~ f X71. .`A' 'JI Wq 4+G t9 n`wl 9 t d: 3: _' _~ 97 t/•.7f1~ ~_~Y ~_ 91: ~))]~N r-.T _~ y /ltl'~Y

~7' ` ~~~•~•~.T~`; '_1. - '.;~—• _~_ ). _~ _~' 1 -.~'+T .. .~_ .L' x'70"n7T`t t ~ e 1 I 'i0i 3 T ' .y.- 1 .~'~il ...

~ ~ , •i - "" _ "`ta

~ 33.i~. ....P ~%~'.~.n-~... 735 ~ .~ C.-..~~` .!q~- ~ ~ r '31:0` '~,- .'32. _ } ,~3~, - - ~:

~. ~. ~_~.AAC iXAC4 • ( .~Y~~:~ .~ `~t ~~~Loca~iai~:~f:-.. X +~ ` ° _, _ a4 .'

~' .. t '. t ~p

- N , f- ~ ~ 'f[~(, ' "• '1 _ -~— ~~ -~3Y_~..,,~.•L41.`~,1.V.-L~.t b7~Y_~~, ll,• ' ,'~?- _

~ t _ __ _ ~_ J. __~ T.~ ~ o~~ ~. , ; ~ ~ ~ _ Section .~4 iC Pent ~"' '` ~ c _ F ~J _ • ..'~~

.' '•.r •+'~v.r,. t .1 3 t ~" ~ '- -'a-'-.~ei.1 ,t•' ` ~ ~;,,,m' 6 ..s.,.' 5 . ~.' 4

~ ~ ~ '3~+ ti , Edleoa ''~ 1.'-w~"~Llt

Z. u: ~ t ~~ 1'Y _~_""`~ ! •. ~ y '~ ..) ~ _ ' ' -

,:

La~• ~~~ ~0 1 L) I F i .E '~-~'•-.—D, ~ r.~. H.a.s _ i'a'-' ~ _ '~~I ;(`• >" ,- _ ;i;~ t~1,= _~.,'•`, ! \ ~ ._..~a.:'r-ra~r-air: ~..t..a-~-.i:-a_..._:r.;e., ±'~ ~•_'ri~—"` I~ ~~,1 .. - y 'iz

~~ - ~.J,wT!~'~ - - - `• ~•~—~•'~'" ~ ~ ~ .l..a~~w ~.~..~.=.ct _ ' _~' '_ 'i7--,~:•••iy'_^?ice "_' T Iwo

' ~~1.~_~,~ ~...- ~.f.~_.~.--vc•--........•-: ---...~. ~~~-',--g'~-.__ ~w...^. .t..r.~-~....--T ~F -39 ~ ~ 2D~'~t'. ' :., j 21 us ` =~.m '~,,

.~ ! ~ ti.[ - ~ a

Vt.Y'P •i , •~~~~ ~

s dM .~ ~+W'U _~..~~.~w.- ~~uw- ~ .wY.~:~a*~~ . Wes. ~._~ .~..0 __~ .~~ar ~^-~-~/~. ~~..~ . •~..

( a... ..~.~

t ~ !~ dy;~ 3 i s • '',,

2B '' a <~_~ ...~_ .'i'~.27-_..-_...-s3;L- .~"^-----n~ ,~~ ~ ~ ...---~--•-.,.~' ~ T

M T N v t ~...~ E ,~'wi~ .~ J~~. , •' ... _ y~

.~._.._.NY~_ , ~ „f_..._---~_1•..r;-._~

- ----- 'j 9.

"y ..-mow_...... -~ ~x .~rer .0~,`, ~`i:~_..:::_~.-.~..—.:..... ~. '--azr- .' •'-'...'il -~—..~~~.~~.,.;-..:~•• j33 X34+

N ~~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~~: ~ ~

!! ~ \ ~ r: r j

~~ ~19_~ ~~on~. Y

. SC~i Glo~o ~~•~ • ~'w ''- .,~1 1 _.` 12

~ csi 7

~-~° .e.,e~ , 9 i9

17~11r5Y]..~ IrK CJC R~ ,r '~s t '_.~•- • ' ro'~r ~ -' ,'_"~

~ ~ ~.w~~ ~ .. , =,r: , aria ~ -- :—F _.~., ~,..... ..: ~ .,. ~ uria'

is

,~i HePDea. edikd, ant PuclishcA by tte Gedogkal Survey -~ .•

t►4~+~ tti-im:~l H X9:.9 Yn! U7ClGa :wllC ..[~~XO Ay16 :'Li.55~FCATi~N -~+,a

~4~ ~ Ta.'~WiwA~ heR ~r V GO~bv~iLt W nxll".'~a mellwh Mr ~•~T~'~~ r~e~. s'-~~,:~~_ ~+~f ~+fr._ ~+ Ll~tdtb. 'fro

~+~ t a+0 ~ ~i~r•:an.c enrwn '9i9 c:e t9S1 °~I i ~Mn.. Yr~Y~a~ aRm 1937. F tla cee~ ]954 ± Via •• ~' _ •~—~'". , ---+••~'~~~'~.~~ Net;urM~tl~~ Un nP'+~ drt.-...-.

Me lmis FRiwltr.. IaJ~WMM.w~or C~IUR. ~J 't'~i'.l c'T.~ -~~~••~ ~"~ ~_'4+M Rm51

t:.U::•m: f C. nsi en :,~Ilbm a mertl~r.h .r~trr. ~r 7 ~ 1 `~~

dsF~d lri Cnt~l~u4a~Mqum~111aei9aas •!f (y,{~[OI~bi3 :e~!11•.:T ~~J"T'ivA~MNT~~~i \+ \

{h[.IMUd ~IMitl!!6 n 11OM ID EI6A~ y~~ OW uC l~~ .+:..~~ wn. wno•~ etoeenr, vearea w~uM ~v ~v» `. ,.~ ED[$0(V, CALIF.

Ot:.4Y,~ of n~l[!.)r y~:~~ OYGr~4I11.1~Y~tDOD owls UnrKrfJ Inm.ww MNwfo~ Y'4 bcN N341.1-aM1164517.!m+~ 11. ,iw~, •n C~u~ 7f Z v~r .:pMYL1:3 ~~ MATID~:,t NAB ~LC.J~M-'~ ST~404M01 1!NFr:n fe.~~`J:~n :'I Gn~Fi dad ror'-waJ~~~e~ ~•R 1MJ ~nfi Po~ $AlC N'/ U 4 G'tOL061GL SUINlV OfJ'IYFA. CdtDPtDO 80ltl. JR RlSTON. NgGiNM ?2092 W1~7tGRLVISEtl 14p! A!7tl 147J.:n.p~~M f~-~ y~.a~ fAa.W~h.aU4.i IiA~I W 13:J a iGt)eR 06C~~Qiw: 1LlC011MKf. MMf 4M0 S1YO~L! 6 AY/u nn~F OA 11IPMST AY] f]Si 1'! SE 9lAlq W!!~~t ~nts~n:tiy~,r_t I~~:a tnxW

Page 12: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

-----

Faci

lity

Fen

ce Lin

e

~~

/r

Facility Wes

tern

es~nw ~r~

e s • e a s e •~~~r wn wr rm ~m as ~n srws wm rsa~w oa weinnwrsrvr ~.~sa mm os sra~v~~swrm.e~e~

e • a e a a

m s

Entrance

;~

Outgoing wastewater

Gate

;

~ pumped to VWDC

r 1 A

~ Ed

ison

Racetrack Hil

l Facility

in Sec. 24, T29S, R29E, MDB&M

1 t,,

M1,.

1 A t ti

'~~ s

Inco

ming

and (Gunit

) '

P

e-Li

ned

~s`"'~~

~ ::

••1 ~ ~ ~1't'

~

I ~~r

,•~~

'~

.•19

~ :r ~~

C ~C

t...

...

0 Y t

~

1E

i

r''s ,~~ ~, r~•

, J; ~ ,

,,, a~

I^~ r ~

~, .a,

~;.;.

U N

C ►

+

~In

comi

ngPond (Gu

nite

-Lin

ed)' ~

~~~4~~

~~~~i~~~

~~.~;-

:..,:::;

...1

s

f 1 t t

C

''a

1:cc

o~

a 0 r e e A t 1 A 4

~'

~'

~

Stor

m Wa

ter Ba

sin

(unlined)

Faci

lity

Eastern

d Entrance

AGa

tei P M 1 1 1 i 1 1 0 0 1 A t e r 0 e r e i i 9 e i 1 t 1 e A 1 1 t t 1 t t 1 a 0 r a e e a a r 0

Phot

o lo

cati

ont

~

~

number, and

edi

recf

iion

.

VALLEY WASTE DISPOSAL COMPANY

RACE TRACK HILL C-PLANT

SECTION 34, T29S, R29E, IUIDB&M

13 AY 20'

11 INSPECTION

Page 13: w:~~r..~:~~ ;~ i r · 2015-07-15 · "B" type compliance — A routine nonsampling inspection. (EPA Type C) Noncompliance follow-up —Inspection made to verify correction of previously

Photo 1: Eastern entry gate to C-Plant Facility.

Photo 2: Looking northwest afi incoming producedoilfield wastewater to the C-Plar~t Facility.

Photo 4: Looking northeast over shipping pond.

aC U O

~~ Q

O ...

_

~z~z

~~~~

~~j~W

~~0~

o—~zcn

W=pz

~U~`~

~~WN

WW

--~ U ~

-~ ~ M