wp1: indicators of investment climate
DESCRIPTION
WP1: Indicators of Investment Climate. Robert Oleschak ECOPLAN , Economic Research and Policy Consultancy TETRIS project meeting Amsterdam 20-21 June 2006. 1 Introduction. Research Objectives. Develop a composite indicator of the investment climate for GHG abatement projects - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1ECOPLAN
WP1: Indicators of Investment Climate
Robert Oleschak
ECOPLAN, Economic Research and Policy Consultancy
TETRIS project meeting
Amsterdam
20-21 June 2006
2ECOPLAN
Research Objectives1 Introduction
Develop a composite indicator of the investment climate for GHG
abatement projects
Compile indicators for a broad range of countries
3ECOPLAN
Setting the Stage1 Introduction
Investment risk is (besides abatement costs)… – one of the main determinant of investment in climate change mitigation
– and plays an important role in determining the distribution
Challenges in measuring investment risk:– Multidimensional nature of the concept being measured (different factors,
which can interact in various ways)
– Difficulty in measuring some dimensions (e.g. policy related risks)
– Different perspectives across firms and activities (not all indicators being
measured are important for investment in climate change mitigation)
4ECOPLAN
2 Timetable and Milestones
Work Package 1
Milestones / ActivitiesJun 05Jul 05 Literature Review
Aug 05 Literature Review
Sep 05 Literature Review
Okt 05 Collecting Data
Nov 05 Draft Indicator Concept
Dez 05 Collecting Data
Jan 06 All Data Available
Feb 06 Building composite indicator
Mrz 06 Building composite indicator
Apr 06 Building composite indicator
Mai 06 Sensitivity Analysis
Jun 06 Draft report
Jul 06 Last data update
Aug 06 Final report
Sep 06Okt 06Nov 06
WS 5: Dissemination
WS 2: Data Collection and Data Handling
WS 3: Building Indicator
WS1: Indicator Concept
WS 4: Final Indicator
5ECOPLAN
3 Status of Work / Progress Against Planning
Main Activities, Problems
Main activities– Review of literature has been conducted
– Data has been collected
– Composite indicator has been compiled
– Statistical analysis has been conducted
– Steps involved in compiling composite indicator have been described
Available Documents– Draft report
Delays / Difficulties– Data is fast out-of-date=> update is planned before submitting final report
6ECOPLAN
Indicator of Investment Climate – Building Blocks4 Composite Indicator
The indicator consists of three main building blocks:
Institutional Environment
Political / Regulatory Environment
Economic Environment
7ECOPLAN
Institutional Environment4 Composite Indicator
Kyoto ratification (Yes/No) DNA established (Yes/No) National registry established (Yes/No) National communication submitted Number of capacity-building programs MoUs with number of countries
JI Institutions
JI policy expressed in NC (Yes/No) Kyoto ratification (Yes/No) DNA established (Yes/No) National communication submitted Number of capacity-building programs MoUs with number of countries
CDM Institutions
CDM policy expressed in NC (Yes/No) Number of AIJ-projects implemented JI
Experience Number of JI-projects at validation Number of AIJ-projects implemented Number of CDM-projects at validation CDM
Experience Number of CDM-projects validated (re-quest for registration or under review)
Number of CDM-projects registered
8ECOPLAN
Political / Regulatory and Economic Environment4 Composite Indicator
Political / Regulatory Environment
Economic Environment
Number of procedures to enforce a contract Days to enforce a contract Enforcing
Contracts Cost to enforce a contract (% of debt amount) Number of procedures to start a business Days to start a business Starting a
Business Cost to start a business (% of income per capita) Number of procedures to register property Days to register property Registering
Property Cost to register property (% of property value)
Inflation (average last 10 years) External debt (% of GDP) Economic and
Default Risk Corruption perception index (10=highly clean, 0=highly corrupt)
9ECOPLAN
Types of indicator– Indicator with ordinal scale: allows rating, limited information on “how much
better”
– Two separate indicators for Annex I and Non-Annex I countries
Geographical Scope– Very broad: 143 countries are covered (Annex I: 37; Non-Annex I: 106)
– No differentiation between industries
Temporal Dimension– Snap-shot of the current situation
– Last update: March 2006
Properties of the Composite Indicator4 Composite Indicator
10ECOPLAN
Main Results: Annex I4 Composite Indicator
Rank Nation CPI Rank Nation CPIInstitution Policy Economy Institution Policy Economy
Belarus -0.99
19 France 0.12
18 Austria 0.14 37
Turkey -0.87
17 Lithuania 0.16 36 Croatia -0.97
16 Japan 0.17 35
Greece -0.41
15 Germany 0.19 34 Ukraine -0.43
14 Latvia 0.22 33
Bulgaria -0.34
13 Estonia 0.23 32 Portugal -0.40
12 Netherlands 0.23 31
Slovenia -0.30
11 UK 0.26 30 Poland -0.31
10 Iceland 0.26 29
Spain -0.12
9 Slovakia 0.29 28 Russian Fed. -0.14
8 Norway 0.31 27
Belgium -0.08
7 Canada 0.35 26 USA -0.10
6 Czech Rep. 0.36 25
Ireland -0.04
5 Switzerland 0.37 24 Italy -0.06
4 Finland 0.38 23
Australia 0.03
3 Sweden 0.44 22 Hungary -0.01
2 Denmark 0.53
20
21
Score of Components Score of Components
1 New Zealand 0.53 Romania 0.03
11ECOPLAN
Main Results: Non Annex I4 Composite Indicator
Rank Nation CPI Rank Nation CPIInstitution Policy Economy Institution Policy Economy
18 Nicaragua 0.29
19 El Salvador 0.29
16 Nepal 0.30
17 Uganda 0.30
14 Colombia 0.36
15 Bolivia 0.31
12 Tunisia 0.43
13 South Korea 0.41
10 Thailand 0.45
11 Argentina 0.45
8 South Africa 0.51
9 Costa Rica 0.50
6 Morocco 0.67
7 Singapore 0.56
4 Chile 0.76
5 Brazil 0.68
2 Mexico 0.96
3 China 0.85
Score of Components
1 India 1.70
21 Jamaica 0.26
20 Malaysia 0.27
23 Sri Lanka 0.25
22 Armenia 0.25
25 Mongolia 0.22
24 Peru 0.25
28 Honduras 0.20
27 Viet Nam 0.21
30 Georgia 0.19
29 Panama 0.20
32 Mauritius 0.12
31 Israel 0.16
34 Moldova 0.11
33 Philippines 0.12
36 Botswana 0.10
35 Uruguay 0.10
38 Iran 0.07
37 Jordan 0.08
40 Fiji 0.06
39 Guyana 0.07
42 Kenya 0.06
41 Ecuador 0.06
44 Egypt 0.03
43 Oman 0.05
46 Mali 0.02
45 Zambia 0.02
48 Samoa 0.01
47 Saudi Arabia 0.01
50 Azerbaijan 0.00
49 Taiwan 0.01
Senegal -0.01
51 Albania -0.01
5226 Guatemala 0.21
Score of Components
12ECOPLAN
Main Results: Non Annex I4 Composite Indicator
Rank Nation CPI Rank Nation CPIInstitution Policy Economy Institution Policy Economy
53 Ghana -0.01
54 Bhutan -0.02
55 Pakistan -0.02
56 Namibia -0.02
57 Mauritania -0.03
58 Madagascar -0.03
59 Cambodia -0.04
60 Solomon Islands -0.05
61 Benin -0.05
62 Papua N. Guinea -0.05
63 Ethiopia -0.06
64 Yemen -0.06
65 UAE -0.07
66 Malawi -0.08
67 Tanzania -0.09
68 Indonesia -0.09
69 Burkina Faso -0.11
70 Dom. Rep. -0.11
71 Tonga -0.12
72 Niger -0.13
73 Macedonia -0.13
74 Rwanda -0.14
75 Guinea -0.14
76 Bangladesh -0.14
77 Lesotho -0.16
78 Kazakhstan -0.17
79 Kyrgyzstan -0.17
80 Kuwait -0.19
81 Eritrea -0.19
82 Paraguay -0.20
83 Uzbekistan -0.20
84 Lebanon -0.23
85 Venezuela -0.23
86 Cameroon -0.24
87 Togo -0.25
88 Algeria -0.26
89 Zimbabwe -0.27
90 Burundi -0.27
91 Mozambique -0.30
92 Afghanistan -0.31
93 Serbia-Monten. -0.34
94 Lao -0.36
95 Iraq -0.42
96 Bosnia Herz. -0.43
97 Syria -0.45
98 Côte d'Ivoire -0.46
99 Central. Afr. Rep. -0.48
-0.54
101 Haiti -0.59
Score of Components
104 Sierra Leone -0.79
102 Chad -0.75
103 Congo
Score of Components
106 Dem. Rep. Congo -1.40
105 Angola -1.28
-0.79
100 Nigeria
13ECOPLAN
5 Steps5 Methodology
Steps taken Outcome
Step 1Selection of countries
Out of 193 countries 143 meet data-requirements criteria.
Step 2Imputation of missing data
Remaing missing data had to be imputed:- Different methods checked (regression imputation, hot deck imputation)- Finaly settled for simple unconditional median imputation- Decision has minor effect on composite indicator
Step 3Transformation and normalisation
Transformation: Data meets principle "the more the better"Normalisation: Variables are made comparable. Often used z-scores method is being applied.
Step 4Weighting
Weights of our composite indicator are based on statistical model (Principal Component Anlysis). Antother often used weighting method (equal weighting) will be looked at in the sensitivity analysis.
Step 5Aggregation
Summation of weighted and normalised variables
14ECOPLAN
6 Sensitivity Analysis
Annex I
NZL DNK CZE SWE NOR FIN ISL CHE CAN GBR DEU NLD EST AUS AUT LTU JPN SVK FRA
USA LVA IRL HUN ROM BEL ESP ITA RUS POL PRT SVN UKR GRC BGR TUR HRV BLR
0
510
15
20
2530
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
15ECOPLAN
6 Sensitivity Analysis
Non Annex I
IND MEX CHN CHL BRA MAR SGP ZAF CRI THA ARG TUN KOR COL BOL NPL UGA NIC SLV MYS JAM ARM LKA PER MNG GTM
VNM HND PAN GEO ISR MUS PHL MDA URY BWA JOR IRN GUY FJI ECU KEN OMN EGY ZMB MLI SAU WSM TWN AZE ALB SEN
0102030405060708090
100110
0102030405060708090
100110
0102030405060708090
100110
16ECOPLAN
6 Sensitivity Analysis
Non Annex I
GHA BTN PAK NAM MRT MDG KHM SLB BEN PNG ETH YEM ARE MWI TZA IDN BFA DOM TON NER MKD RWA GIN BGD LSO KAZ KGZ
KWT ERI PRY UZB LBN VEN CMR TGO DZA ZWE BDI MOZ AFG SCG LAO IRQ BIH SYR CIV CAF NGA HTI TCD COG SLE AGO COD
0102030405060708090
100110
0102030405060708090
100110
17ECOPLAN
Input for WP 6 (Quantitative Analysis of International Emissions
Trading)– Composite Indicator is of use to investors
– Results will be applied in quantitative analysis in WP6
Linkage with WP3 (Permit Supply for the CDM)– Country-coverage of indicator has to be matched with WP3
– Transaction costs: is being incorporated into WP3
– Technological risk: Input from WP3 into WP1, but not part of the indicator
Linkages to other WP7 Linkages