wp operative plan wp 4 : functional requirements task responsible: regione piemonte
TRANSCRIPT
WP Operative Plan
WP 4 : Functional requirements
Task Responsible: Regione Piemonte
WP Operative Plan
WP 4 : Project planning
and timetableWPcodes
Work-Package or Task Time
Phases Months with deliverables
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11
12
1 2 3
02
03
04
05
WP4 Functional requirements4.1 Functional and Systems
needs4.2 Design and preparation of
the survey4.3 Assessment4.4 Validation and reporting
Task 4.1: Functional and system needs
Start: June 2002 End: July 2002
ActivitiesPartners
contributingStart andEnd Date
1. Preliminary analysis about GIS functionality actuallyavailable on some WEB sites
6-20026-2002
1. Preparation of a preliminary catalogue about the types offunctionality found in the WEB sites analysed
6-20026-2002
2. Sharing the preliminary catalogue with the WP2, WP3 eWP5 responsibles and with the WP4 partners to analyseother WEB-GIS sites
1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 18
6-20026-2002
3. Integration of the different contributions 6-20027-2002
4. Preparation of a synthesis catalogue about the WEB-GISfunctionalities actually available in Internet
7-20027-2002
5. Sharing a with the partner the results of the synthesiscatalogue
1, 2, 3, 6, 8,9, 18
7-20027-2002
6. Release of the final catalogue about the WEB-GISfunctionality actually available in Internet
7-20027-2002
Task 4.1: Functional and system needs
Start: June 2002 End: July 2002
Partner Contribution to the task
1 – GISIG Co-ordination and supervising for the catalogue diffusion
Co-ordination and validation of the partners contributions
2 – JRC
3 – Aberdeen
4 – IONIC
5 – Evora
Integration of the preliminary catalogue with their owncontributions
(In case) co-ordination of others contributions coming-out fromthe partners
Technical support during the feasibility evaluation
Match between the finals users needs and the preliminaryfunctional and systemic requisites
6 – Cemagref
8 – Tarnium
9 – Univ. Grenoble
18 – Jagellonian Univ.
Integration of the preliminary catalogue with their owncontributions
Contribution to the draft version and verification of the finalcatalogue
Contribution to the individuation of needs and link to thetraining environment
Contribution to the individuation of needs and link to nationalactors (landscapes parks)
Task 4.2: Design and preparation of the survey
Start: June 2002 End: July 2002
ActivitiesPartners
contributingStart andEnd Date
1. Identification of the stakeholder typology to be involved forthe compilation of the questionnaire
1, 2, 3, 6, 8,9, 18
6-20026-2002
2. Identification of the stakeholders to be involved for thepreliminary test of questionnaire delivery
1, 2, 3, 6, 8,9, 18
6-20026-2002
3. Formulation of the draft questionnaire regarding thefunctional requirements section
6-20026-2002
4. Internal test and integration of the functional requirementssection of the questionnaire
1, 2, 3, 4, 6,8, 9, 18
6-20026-2002
5. Integration with the others questionnaire sections 1, 3, 5 6-20027-2002
6. Circulation of the comprehensive questionnaire draft 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 18
7-20027-2002
7. Results analysis of the questionnaire test results 7-20027-2002
8. Draft of the final questionnaire 1, 3, 5 7-20027-2002
Task 4.2: Design and preparation of the survey
Start: June 2002 End: July 2002
Partner Contribution to the task
1 – GISIG Co-ordination and supervising during the draft questionnairecirculation
2 – JRC
3 – Aberdeen
Stakeholders individuation
Test of the draft questionnaire
5 – Evora Integration and circulation of the draft questionnaire
6 – Cemagref
8 – Tarnium
9 – Univ. Grenoble
18 – Jagiellonian Univ.
Stakeholders individuation
Draft questionnaire diffusion
Contribution to the individuation of needs and link to the trainingenvironment
Contribution to the individuation of needs and link to nationalactors (landscapes parks)
Task 4.3: Assessment
Start: August 2002 End: December 2002
ActivitiesPartners
contributingStart andEnd Date
1. Identification of the stakeholders to be involved for thecompilation of the final questionnaire
1, 2, 3, 5, 6,7, 8, 9, 18
8-20028-2002
2. Questionnaire translation into the local languages Nationalresponsible
partners
8-20028-2002
3. Questionnaire diffusion all 8-200210-2002
4. Transmission of the filled in questionnaire all 10-200211-2002
5. Preliminary evaluation of the results about the functionalrequirements section
11-200212-2002
Partner Contribution to the task
1 – GISIG Co-ordination of the stakeholders identification phase
All Partners Collaboration for the questionnaire diffusion
Task 4.4: Validation and reporting
Start: January 2003 End: March 2003
ActivitiesPartners
contributingStart andEnd Date
1. Circulation of the preliminary questionnaire analysis 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 18
1-20031-2003
2. Definition of the criteria for the results elaboration 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 12,15, 16, 17,
18, 19
1-20031-2003
3. Results elaboration of the survey 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,8, 9, 18
2-20032-2003
4. Draft of the preliminary report 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,8, 9, 18
2-20032-2003
5. Circulation of the report preliminary draft 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 8, 9, 12,15, 16, 17,
18, 19
2-20033-2003
6. Draft of the final report 1, 2, 3, 6, 8,9, 18
3-20033-2003
7. Validation 12, 15, 16,17, 19
3-20033-2003
Task 4.4: Validation and reporting
Start: January 2003 End: March 2003
Partner Contribution to the task
1 – GISIG Co-ordination for the documents circulation
2 – JRC
3 – Aberdeen
8 – Tarnium
5 – Evora
Contribute to the criteria definition for the results evaluation
Support during the results evaluation phase
6 – Cemagref
8 – Tarnium
9 – Univ. Grenoble
18 – JagiellonianUniv.
Contribute to the results evaluation
Contribute to the draft of final report
12 – Luleå
15 – VÚGTK
16 – EstonianEIC/ME
17 – WH University
19 – Univ of Zilina
Validation of the results elaboration and of the final report