worldsid 50th update klaus bortenschlager

50WorldSID 50WorldSID thth Update Update

Klaus BortenschlagerKlaus BortenschlagerPDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and PDB - Partnership for Dummy Technology and

BiomechanicsBiomechanicson behalf of the WorldSID Task Groupon behalf of the WorldSID Task Group

4444thth GRSP Session GRSP SessionGeneva, December 12, 2007Geneva, December 12, 2007

Informal Document No. GRSP-44-33(44th session, 10-12 December 2008, agenda item 5(a))

Klaus Bortenschlager WorldSID 50th UpdatePDB 44th GRSP Session, Geneva, December 12, 2008 2

OutlineOutline

Retrospective

- 50ISO WorldSID th Evaluation

- 50NHTSA WorldSID th Evaluation

FurtherActivities

Summary


RetrospectiveRetrospective

42Last WorldSIDUpdate at nd 2007session in December

50Release of WorldSID th 9production version on March th, 2004 45 Developed by over organizations from around the world

Governmental agencies, research institutes, automotive manufacturers Full vehicle tests covering all side impact test procedures -, - Extensive sled component and certification test series

1000 Fully evaluated in more than tests worldwide WorldSIDmeets the ISOspecifications

- 15830WorldSIDInternational Standard ISO 2005Documentation available since

2004Start of NHTSAWorldSIDevaluation in


- 50ISO WorldSID - 50ISO WorldSID thth Evaluation Evaluation

9790WorldSIDBiofidelity rating according to ISOTR , , WorldSIDTesting conducted by OSRP Transport Canada and

NHTSA WorldSIDTask Group and NHTSAconducted similarsled tests

Data is similarbetween the two organizations Calculated ISObiofidelity rating using ISOdata and NHTSA

data

2007ISOevaluation finalized in


unacceptableunacceptable marginal fair good excellentmarginal fair good excellent 00 2.62.6 4.44.4 6.56.5 8.68.6 1010

- 50ISO WorldSID - 50ISO WorldSID thth Evaluation Evaluation

9790Biofidelity Rating according to ISOTR -2 Comparison of ES re vs WorldSID

WorldSID ( )Ford OSRP

4.8

7.37.58.35.510

7.17.1 4.4

7.57.48.35.510

4.24.23.2

4.14.04.54.25

ES-2re

OverallOverall

Pelvis

AbdomenThoraxShoulderNeckHead

Body Region

WorldSID/NHTSAVRTC

7.27.2 ““GOOD”GOOD”


- 50NHTSA WorldSID - 50NHTSA WorldSID thth Evaluation Evaluation

50Two instrumented WorldSID th provided by OSRP

/ Evaluation tests conducted at NHTSAVRTClaboratory :Tests focused on

Biofidelity− ( 2002)NHTSArating Rhule

Anthropometry 214 WorldSIDfull scale evaluation underFMVSS test conditions

- 50NHTSA WorldSID th 2008evaluation finalized in mid


- 50NHTSA WorldSID - 50NHTSA WorldSID thth Evaluation Evaluation ( 2002) NHTSABiofidelity Rating Rhule

:External biofidelity

Ability to replicate human loading of its environment in a crash Measurements made externally to human and dummy

:Internal biofidelity

Ability to replicate human internal response in a crash Internal measurements used forinjury criteria


- 50NHTSA WorldSID - 50NHTSA WorldSID thth Evaluation Evaluation ( 2002) NHTSABiofidelity Rating Rhule

Test matrix

9790 - 2ISO Pelvis Test 2Pelvis Test10 / ms Rigid Pendulum Pelvis Impact

9790 - 1ISO Pelvis Test 1Pelvis Test6 / m s Rigid PendulumPelvis Impact

9790 - 3 10ISO Abdomen Test &Pelvis Test Wayne State Sled Test6.8 / m s Rigid Wall Sled

9790 - 5 7ISO Thorax Test &Pelvis Test Heidelberg Sled Test6.8 / m s Rigid Wall Sled

9790 - 1ISO Thorax Test 1Thorax Test4.3 / m s Rigid PendulumLateral and Oblique Thorax Impact

9790 - 3 3ISO NeckTest &ShoulderTest 3Neck Test12.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

9790 - 1 3ISO NeckTest &ShoulderTest 1Neck Test7.2 g Restrained Occupant Sled

9790 - 1ISO Head Test 1Head Test200 mmRigid Lateral Head Drop

Reference Test Name Test Condition

. 2002Maltese et al NHTSAHS FP8.9 / m s Flat Padded Wall Sled

. 2002Maltese et al NHTSALS RPO6.7 / m s Rigid Pelvis Offset Sled

. 2002Maltese et al NHTSALS RAO6.7 / m s Rigid Abdomen Offset Sled

. 2002Maltese et al NHTSALS FP6.7 / m s Flat Padded Wall Sled

. 2002Maltese et al NHTSALS FR6.7 / m s Flat Rigid Wall Sled

. 2006Shaw et al NHTSAThorax Test2.5 / m s Rigid PendulumLateral and Oblique Thorax Impact

. 2003Bolte et al NHTSAShoulderTest4.4 / m s Padded PendulumLateral and Oblique ShoulderImpact


0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

5,0

Neck Shoulder Thorax Abdomen Pelvis Overall

√ R

WorldSID

ES-2re


( 2002)NHTSABiofidelity Rating Rhule - -2 External biofidelity Comparison of ES re vs WorldSID

B

iofi

de

lity

+

-

Go o d B i o f i d e l i t y

Ave

rag

e √R

0.8

2.5

0.8

1.9

3.0 2.9

1.9

2.7 2.8

4.8

1.9

3.2


0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

2,5

3,0

3,5

4,0

4,5

5,0

Head Shoulder Thorax Abdomen Pelvis * Overall

√ R

WorldSID

ES-2re


( 2002) NHTSABiofidelity Rating Rhule - -2 Internal biofidelity Comparison of ES re vs WorldSID

B

iofi

de

lity

+

-

Ave

rag

e √R

(w/o Abdomen)

-2 :ES re No measurement of

abdomen deflection.available

Go o d B i o f i d e l i t y

0.3

1.0

2.3

1.9 2.0

2.4 2.4

1.81.5 1.6 1.7



:NHTSABiofidelity Results Good repeatability Good reproducibility Good durability Good handling 9790Good biofidelity rating according to ISOTR Good biofidelity rating based on NHTSArating scheme

The WorldSID 50The WorldSID 50thth male dummy is an improved side male dummy is an improved side impact test dummyimpact test dummy



Anthropometry study UMTRIManikin as reference



Anthropometry study -2 ES re versus UMTRIseating

Thorax Rib 2Thorax Rib 2

Head CGHead CG

Shoulder JointShoulder Joint

H-PointH-Point


Abdomen ForceAbdomen Force

-2ES re-2ES re




Anthropometry study WorldSIDversus UMTRIseating


Head CGHead CG


H-PointH-Point


Abdomen Rib 2Abdomen Rib 2

WorldSIDWorldSID

Thorax Rib 3Thorax Rib 3Abdomen Rib 1Abdomen Rib 1



Anthropometry study -2 WorldSIDversus ES re in UMTRIseating

Head CGHead CG


H-PointH-Point


-2ES re-2ES re

H-PointH-Point

Head CGHead CG



WorldSIDWorldSID


Abdomen Rib 2Abdomen Rib 2

Thorax Rib 2Thorax Rib 2Thorax Rib 3Thorax Rib 3

Abdomen ForceAbdomen ForceAbdomen Rib 1Abdomen Rib 1Thorax Rib 3Thorax Rib 3



:Results of anthropometry study WorldSIDanthropometry based on UMTRI -2 -ES re anthropometry based on Hybrid III

WorldSIDhas a more “slouched” position

WorldSIDWorldSID -2ES re-2ES re [mm] [mm] [mm] [mm]

Shoulder widthShoulder width 480 480 485485 Thorax width (nipple)Thorax width (nipple) 371371 337337Pelvis widthPelvis width 410410 355355Sitting heightSitting height ( / ) neck torso interface( / ) neck torso interface 600600 660660Sitting height (erect)Sitting height (erect) 870870 920920Leg LengthLeg Length 555 555 452452

The WorldSID anthropometry is more realisticThe WorldSID anthropometry is more realistic



NHTSA 214 - full scale evaluation underFMVSS test conditions Pole &MDB -2Same fleet vehicles used to evaluate the ES re

WorldSIDIARVs proposed by WorldSIDTG ( 1.0) WorldSIDseating procedure Draft provided by dummy positioning

-sub committee

214 FMVSS MDB Test 214 FMVSS MDB Test

• 2005 Subaru Forester2005 Subaru Forester• 2005 500Ford2005 500Ford• 2006 VWJetta2006 VWJetta• 2005 Saturn Ion2005 Saturn Ion• 2005 Honda CRV2005 Honda CRV

214 FMVSS Pole Test 214 FMVSS Pole Test

• 2004 Honda Accord2004 Honda Accord• 2005 Subaru Forester2005 Subaru Forester• 2006 Toyota Sienna2006 Toyota Sienna• 2005 500Ford2005 500Ford• 2006 VWJetta2006 VWJetta• 2005 Saturn Ion2005 Saturn Ion• 2005 Ford Expedition2005 Ford Expedition• 2005 ( )VWBeetle Convertible2005 ( )VWBeetle Convertible



Results of NHTSA full scale evaluation Good durability

- MDB tests no damages on WorldSID - Pole tests minordamages reported

Pole Test Summary Pole Test Summary ( )Currently no detailed analyses available( )Currently no detailed analyses available

• 5 8 -2 out of vehicles exceeded IARVs forboth ES re and WorldSID5 8 -2 out of vehicles exceeded IARVs forboth ES re and WorldSID

MDB Test Summary MDB Test Summary ( )Currently no detailed analyses available( )Currently no detailed analyses available

• -2 All vehicles passed IARVs forboth ES re and WorldSID -2 All vehicles passed IARVs forboth ES re and WorldSID• WorldSIDtests produced more marginal responses WorldSIDtests produced more marginal responses• Differences are more pronounced in the pole testing Differences are more pronounced in the pole testing



Results of NHTSA ( .)full scale evaluation cont , -2 Due to different anthropometry body regions of ES re and

WorldSIDare in different locations

Different head positions produce different impact locations . in pole tests

Thorax and abdomens are aligned differently with the vehicle interior

:Test data available at NHTSAwebpage :Test data available at NHTSAwebpage

:// - . . . / / -11/ _ .http www nrd nhtsa dot gov database nrd veh db html:// - . . . / / -11/ _ .http www nrd nhtsa dot gov database nrd veh db html


FurtherActivities FurtherActivities

:NHTSA

Preparation of documentation needed to Federalize the WorldSID Preparation of documentation needed to Federalize the WorldSID5050thth Male Male

Injury criteria development Injury criteria development

Evaluation of seating procedure Evaluation of seating procedure

5Evaluation of WorldSID 5Evaluation of WorldSID thth Female Female

:EU:EU

- 50Request to EEVC SCforWorldSID - 50Request to EEVC SCforWorldSID thth Male evaluation according Male evaluation according to the EEVCrequirements to the EEVCrequirements



:TRANSPORTCANADA

50Comparison of WorldSID 50Comparison of WorldSID thth Male Male 2 response to ES re response in 214 FMVSS barriertests

50Finalization of the harmonized seating procedure forWorldSID 50Finalization of the harmonized seating procedure forWorldSID th th

2009in mid of 2009in mid of

( ) 50Evaluation of multipoint sensing RibEye in WorldSID ( ) 50Evaluation of multipoint sensing RibEye in WorldSID thth ( March ( March2009)2009)

Biofidelity evaluation of updated Biofidelity evaluation of updated 5WorldSID 5WorldSID thth Female Female

5Evaluation of updated WorldSID 5Evaluation of updated WorldSID thth Female in full scale Female in full scale .reconstruction of a pole crash .reconstruction of a pole crash



:ISO

15830 2009Upgrade of ISO documents will be finalized early 15830 2009Upgrade of ISO documents will be finalized early

50Development of Injury Risk Curves forWorldSID 50Development of Injury Risk Curves forWorldSID thth Male by Male by 22/ 12/ 6 ( 12350)ISOTC SC WG working group ISOTR 22/ 12/ 6 ( 12350)ISOTC SC WG working group ISOTR

2009Completion expected by May 2009Completion expected by May


SummarySummary

50NHTSAWorldSID 50NHTSAWorldSID thth evaluation is completed evaluation is completedsuccessfullysuccessfully

50WorldSID 50WorldSID thth -2 biofidelity is betterthan ES re in both -2 biofidelity is betterthan ES re in both ( )rating schemes NHTSA&ISO ( )rating schemes NHTSA&ISO

, , Good durability repeatability reproducibility and usability , , Good durability repeatability reproducibility and usability 50WorldSID 50WorldSID thth anthropometry is more realistic anthropometry is more realistic

The WorldSID 50The WorldSID 50thth male dummy is an improved male dummy is an improved side impact test dummyside impact test dummy

!Thank you !Thank you

www.worldsid.orgwww.worldsid.org

worldsid 50th update klaus bortenschlager

Documents