world bank document · iii. vallabhipur-ranghola (27 km): this corridor acts as a main connector...

The World BankSecond Gujarat State Highway Project (GSHP II) (P114827)

REPORT NO.: RES32179

RESTRUCTURING PAPER

ON A

PROPOSED PROJECT RESTRUCTURING

OF

SECOND GUJARAT STATE HIGHWAY PROJECT (GSHP II)

APPROVED ON DECEMBER 13, 2013

TO

DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS

TRANSPORT & DIGITAL DEVELOPMENT

SOUTH ASIA

Regional Vice President: Hartwig SchaferCountry Director: Junaid Kamal Ahmad

Senior Global Practice Director: Jose Luis IrigoyenPractice Manager/Manager: Karla Gonzalez Carvajal

Task Team Leader: Shigeyuki Sakaki

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized


ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

DBFOMT Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain-TransferEIA Environment Impact AssessmentEPC Engineering Procurement ConstructionICT Information & Communication TechnologyITS Intelligent Transport SystemLA & R&R Land Acquisition & Resettlement & Rehabilitation MIS Management Information SystemNCB National Competitive BiddingOPRC Output and Performance-based Road ContractPDO Project Development ObjectiveR&BD Roads & Buildings DepartmentRFP Request for ProposalROB Road-over-bridgeSCDP Safe Corridor Demonstration ProjectSIA Social Impact AssessmentTA Technical Assistance


Note to Task Teams: The following sections are system generated and can only be edited online in the Portal.

BASIC DATA

Product Information

Project ID Financing Instrument

P114827 Investment Project Financing

Original EA Category Current EA Category

Full Assessment (A) Full Assessment (A)

Approval Date Current Closing Date

13-Dec-2013 31-Jan-2019

Organizations

Borrower Responsible Agency

Department of Economic Affairs Department of Roads & Buildings, Government of Gujarat

Project Development Objective (PDO)

Original PDOThe project development objective is to improve capacity, and enhance quality and safety of road services for the users of the coreroad network of state highways in Gujarat, through institutional strengthening and efficient contracting and financing strategies.OPS_TABLE_PDO_CURRENTPDOSummary Status of Financing

Ln/Cr/Tf Approval Signing Effectiveness ClosingNet

Commitment Disbursed Undisbursed

IBRD-83130 13-Dec-2013 12-Feb-2014 19-Mar-2014 31-Jan-2019 175.00 69.09 105.91

Policy Waiver(s)

Does this restructuring trigger the need for any policy waiver(s)?No


Note to Task Teams: End of system generated content, document is editable from here.

I. PROJECT STATUS AND RATIONALE FOR RESTRUCTURING

1. Based on the last ISR archived on June 28, 2018, Progress towards achievement of PDO was rated Moderately Satisfactory and the Implementation Progress was rated Moderately Satisfactory, with the latest aide memoire rated Component A1 as Satisfactory and A2, B and C Moderately Satisfactory.

2. Component A – Highway Improvement (Total US$ 289.3 million [A1-US$ 179.8 million+A2-US$ 109.5 million], WB US$ 153.2 million)

a. Sub–component A1: Upgradation and rehabilitation of state roads. Construction of all corridors is complete except for two (NCB-01 & NCB-02B). In NCB-01 one ROB is in progress and will be completed before original loan closing date. Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement (LA and R&R) for NCB-02B is in progress and contract award is expected by March 2019 with construction period of 21 months.

b. Sub–component A2: Four-laning of Mehsana-Himatnagar corridor through Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain-Transfer (DBFOMT), and Output and Performance-based Road Contract (OPRC) for three corridors.

i. The concession contract for Mehsana–Himatnagar DBFOMT is in progress. The construction started in February 2017 and expected for completion by August 2018, 6 months earlier than the original construction period of 24 months. The Bank loan will reimburse the upfront payment linked with the completion of construction and associated consultant cost (50% share through loan support, rest 50% by the Concessionaire), while the overall duration of the contract is for 12 years.

ii. The RFP document of the OPRC contract has been issued, and the contract is expected to be awarded in September 2018. The contract period is 10 years, including an estimated 2 years of construction (widening and strengthening). The bank loan will reimburse 100% of the contract payments including the associated independent monitoring services during the tenure of the loan.

3. Component B – Sector Policy and Institutional Development (Total US$ 12 million, WB US$ 7.4 million): All consultants are on board and recommendations given, and many of the recommendations have been approved by the client, Roads and Buildings Department (R&BD). Implementation of some recommendations are planned to be taken up during the project period and some will extend beyond the original project completion date.

4. Component C – Road Safety Management (Total US$ 22 million, WB US$ 13.6 million): a. Safe Corridor Demonstration Project (SCDP) – Bharuch – Dehgam: Contract for civil works was awarded in October

2017 and ITS interventions are under coordination with Police (Home Department of Government of Gujarat) on their contract that includes the control center. Implementation of ITS will go beyond the original closing date of the project.

b. Road Safety TA: Two previous attempts to award this consultancy have failed and the re-bidding process will be initiated. Implementation period for this activity will go beyond original project closing date.

5. Disbursement: Disbursement continues to be slow in comparison to the projections (disbursement of US$ 66.63 million upto May 23, 2018) which is due to: (i) lower value bids received for civil works (23% below estimate on average); (ii) currency fluctuations between INR and USD of about 11% of over expenditure; (iii) price adjustments. Proposed project


extension and reallocation of project savings towards new corridors will help in correcting the disbursement graph over the new project life cycle.

6. The Mid-Term Review mission held during December 2016 and the seventh implementation support mission held in July 2017 noted a need for project extension due to unavoidable delays and present status in key activities, such as:

a. The scope changes in the Output and Performance-based Road Contract (OPRC), under Component A2; b. Time required to have the state framework for Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement operational,

which relates to Component A1; c. The need to select a different SCDP Corridor due to declaration of previous corridor as National Highway, under

Component C; and d. Implementation and Coordination required for the comprehensive recommendations for the institutional

development of R&BD, under Component B.


II. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES

7. The following changes are proposed under this restructuring: a. An extension of project implementation period by 23 months, i.e. upto December 31, 2020 as requested by the

Government of India; b. Reallocation of unused loan amount to add three new road corridors, one SCDP corridor, and purchase of

IT/ICT/MIS related application, goods and equipment, and minor civil works; c. Revisions to relevant project indicators and legal covenants to make adjustment for extended project timeline

and addition of new activities.

8. It is proposed to reallocate the unutilized loan amount of US$ 44 million to enhance the expected impact of the project by addition of the following activities:

a. New SCDP (Safe Corridor Demonstration Project) corridor of Gandhinagar-Indira bridge: The previously allocated corridor for SCDP has been declared as a National Highway. The new corridor proposed for inclusion in the project has strategic significance and demonstration potential as it connects Ahmedabad and the state capital, Gandhinagar. Due to high volume of traffic at high speed, the road safety risk is considered high, especially for pedestrians and motorists.

b. New corridors for widening and major maintenance/rehabilitation: Three corridors including one city bypass flyover in below are being proposed for inclusion in the project. Enhanced road safety measures will be included in all of these corridors.

i. Radhanpur- Chanasma (60.4 km): This corridor connects two national highways and enhances connectivity between North Gujarat and Kachchh. Significant shoulder erosion caused by flooding will be corrected. It also improves alternative interstate connectivity for long distance traffic.

ii. Mehsana – Palanpur: 1) Mehsana – Palanpur (61.8 km): This four-lane corridor acts as connector to two national highways,

connects Ahmedabad to Palanpur and beyond with continuous four-laning (Ahmedabad-Mehsana-Palanpur). The corridor is an important link for interstate traffic as well as to regions of Northern and Central Gujarat. Four-laning of this corridor was implemented in GSHP-I, and it is proposed to widen further with paved shoulder. This road holds strategic significance for boosting industrialization in Northern Gujarat and for connectivity with the State of Rajasthan and beyond.

2) Four-laning Road-Over-Bridge (ROB) of Mehsana Bypass (5 km): The section of the bypass will continue the ongoing four-laning of National Highway from the southern section of the bypass to connect to the Mehsana-Palanpur, so that all through connection will be made with four lanes. Two lane ROB has been constructed by GoG, and another two-lane ROB will be constructed by the project along the existing ROB. It improves connectivity and eases traffic in the city of Mehsana and segregates long distance traffic with local traffic.

iii. Vallabhipur-Ranghola (27 km): This corridor acts as a main connector between central Gujarat and Saurashtra. It also acts as an alternative interstate connectivity for long distance traffic and improves connectivity for tourism and industrial places in southern Saurashtra in Gujarat.

c. For all of these new corridors, Engineering-Procurement-Construction (EPC) plus Maintenance contract will be used to examine the effectiveness of different procurement method, in addition to DBFOMT, OPRC, and extended maintenance on item rate, all of which are already in the project. EPC plus Maintenance will fill the void in between DBFOMT, which addresses the substantial capital improvement requirement, and OPRC, which is more often used for projects without heavy capital expenditure. As traffic volume goes up in most highways in India, particularly in state highways in Gujarat, it has become clear to GoG and the task team that there is a clear demand for an innovative contracting method designed to address medium-scale capital expenditure while


ensuring a high level of maintenance. It was particularly evident through the designing of the OPRC contract for corridors that are expected to have much higher demand over the contract period. Piloting EPC plus Maintenance for the three new corridors with different project characteristics will certainly add options for GoG to effectively construct and maintain the network.

d. Purchase of IT/ICT/MIS related application, goods and equipment, and minor civil works: To implement the ICT-MIS Strategy and Action Plan decisions, the client will procure: Specialized ICT-MIS services for development and implementation of systems integration and applications software; acquisition / development of new ITS software and equipment for various road sector applications,; acquisition / implementation of modern technical applications software and business systems and equipment, and; Minor civil works / physical upgrading of Engineering Staff College (ESC). This will enable R&BD, Gujarat Engineering Research Institute (GERI), ESC and the new Center of Excellence (CoE) to become more efficient and more accessible to their sector stakeholders and clientele, to improve their sustainability and to perform more effectively in delivering their mandated services to the roads sector and in discharging their technical, operational and administrative responsibilities and functions in the overall R&BD and GoG management framework.

e. Reference to Loan Agreement: A reference of these activities to project components described in the SCHEDULE I of the original Loan Agreement is provided in below:

i. The new SCDP corridor is a part of Component C activities, specifically the section 1 under Component C.ii. New road corridors are a part of the section 1 under Component A.

iii. Purchase of IT/ICT/MIS application, goods and equipment, and minor works is a part of the section 1, 3, and 4 activities under Component B.

9. The proposed corridors total a length of about 154.2 km with total cost of about INR 520 crore (US$ 80 million). Additional corridor details are provided in the table below:

S. No. List of Roads State Highway No.

Right of Way

Present Lane Configuration

Length(Km)

Cost (INR Crores)

1 Radhanpur - Chanasma 55 30 2 lanes with Paved Shoulder

60.4 80

2-1 Mehsana – Palanpur 41 60 4 lanes with Paved Shoulder

61.8 325

2-2 Mehsana bypass including ROB

- 60 2 lanes with Paved Shoulder

5 65

3 Vallabhipur-Ranghola 39 24 2 lanes with Paved Shoulder

27 50

TOTAL 154.2 520

10. Given below is the original and revised component-wise allocation of funds after utilization of savings.

Original Project Cost & Financing(US$ Million)

Revised Project Cost & Financing(US$ Million)

Component

Total WB Share GoG Share Private Total WB Share GoG Share PrivateComponent A-1

179.8 106.1 73.7 198.4 101.0 97.4

Component A-2

109.5 47.1 25 37.4 101.1 45.9 17.8 37.4


Component B

12 7.4 4.6 16.5 10.2 6.3

Component C

22 13.6 8.4 27.7 17.1 10.6

Front End Fee

0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4

TOTAL (Rounded off)

323 175 111 37.4 344 175 132 37.4

11. Following the proposed changes in the reallocation, the amount allocated in the categories need to be revised as below.

Amount of the Loan Allocated(expressed in USD)

Percentage of Expenditure to be financed (inclusive of taxes)

Category

ORIGINAL REVISED ORIGINAL REVISED(NO CHANGE)

(1) Goods, works, non-consulting services, consultants’ services, and Workshops & Training for Components A.1, B and C of the Project

127,562,500 128,662,500 62% 62%

(2) Goods, works, non-consulting services, consultants’ services, and Workshops & Training under Component A.2 of the Project

47,000,000 45,900,000 100% 100%

(3) Front end fee 437,500 437,500 Amount payable pursuant to Section 2.03 of this

Agreement in accordance with Section 2.07(b) of the

General Conditions

Amount payable pursuant to Section 2.03 of this

Agreement in accordance with Section 2.07(b) of the

General Conditions(4) Interest Rate Cap or Interest Rate Collar Premium

0 0 Amount due pursuant to Section 2.0(c) of this

Agreement in accordance with Section 4.05(c) of the

General Conditions

Amount due pursuant to Section 2.0(c) of this

Agreement in accordance with Section 4.05(c) of the

General ConditionsTOTAL AMOUNT 175,000,000 175,000,000


12. Relevant changes will need to be made to the results indicators and legal covenants arising from the extension of closing date and addition of new activities. Results indicators that have proposed modifications are provided in the table below, and full table is provided in Annex 1:

Indicator name Proposed change Reason for changePDO Indicators

Number of annual fatalities on safe corridor(s)Unit of measure: Number

BaselineOriginal: 13 (A-V), 9 (B-D)Revised: 9 (B-D), 9 (G-I)

End targetOriginal: 11 (A-V), 7 (B-D)Revised: 7 (B-D), 7 (G-I)

Ankleshwar-Valia (A-V) corridor was declared as National Highway and hence proposed to be dropped and replaced with Gandhinagar-Indira bridge corridor (G-I)

Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads

End targetOriginal: 60Revised: 75

The contribution of improvement under this project will be equivalent of 12% increase.

Intermediate IndicatorsRoads constructed, non- rural(Core Indicator)Unit of measure: Km

End TargetOriginal: 350Revised: 460.7

Original 350 km includes (259.89 km W&S corridors NCB-01,2,3,5,7, and 8), 60 .75 km DBFOMT and 27 km OPRC (D-D)Revised Target is 460.7 km includes ((259.89 km W&S corridors NCB-01,2,3,5,7, and 8), 60 .75 km DBFOMT and 73.25 km OPRC (D-D and D-P), 61.8 km Mehsana-Palanpur and 5 km Mehsana Bypass

Safety Demonstration Corridor, complying with a minimum iRAP star rating of 3 developedUnit of measure: Km


Original 30 km includes 11km (B-D) and 19 km (A-V).The proposed change includes dropping of A-V corridor (19 km) and adding of G-I corridor (12 km)

Roads rehabilitated, Non-rural (Core Indicator)Unit of measure: Km

End TargetOriginal: 275Revised: 292.8

Original 175 km includes rehabilitation corridors, and 100 km under OPRC (46 km for Dhandhuka-Paliad and 54 km for Dhanduka-Surendranagar). The end target proposed to be revised to 292.8 km after reducing 23 km under OPRC (Limdbi-Surendranagar dropped), in addition 4 km section of Limbdi-Dhandhuka as well as 46 km (Dhandhuka-Paliyad, converted into W&S) and adding 60.4 km (Radhanpur-Chanasma), and 27.0 km (Vallabhipur-Ranghola).

Length of road developed under innovative contracting methodUnit of measure: Km

End targetOriginal: 190Revised: 318.16

End target proposed to be revised after changing OPRC from 130 km to 103.21 km. Reduction is for 23 km for Limbdi-Surendranagar and 4 km section of Limbdi-Dhandhuka and adding 60.75 km Mehsana – Himatnagar corridor (DBFOMT) along with new proposed corridors 61.8 km Mehsana-Palanpur, 5 km Mehsana Bypass, 60.4 Radhanpur-Chanasma and 27.0 km Vallabhipur-Ranghola.


13. Proposed revisions in the legal covenants are given in the table below:

Existing Proposed ModificationF. Institutional and Road Safety ImprovementThe Project Implementing Entity shall: (a) by no later than June 30, 2017apply the enhanced GRMS in the planning and budgeting decisions of R&BD, including through the placement of at least 200 kilometers of core road network under a multi-year maintenance and safety contracting structure

June 30, 2020

(b) by no later than March 21, 2017, develop a functional road safety monitoring and evaluation systems for the road safety demonstration corridor(s)

March 31, 2019

III. APPRAISAL SUMMARY

14. After obtaining clarifications and additional information, the proposed changes were discussed and the details agreed during the implementation support mission in June.

15. Economic Analysis: An economic analysis for the proposed road corridors has been carried out which has assessed the economic internal rate of return (EIRR) and economic net present value (ENPV). The economic analysis for the proposed corridors is undertaken as per the method laid down in the IRC: SP-30-2009 combined with updated Road User Cost Study RUCS-2001. The tool adopted for the analysis is Life Cycle Analysis. The main project economic benefits considered by the analysis are: road user cost savings primarily including: (a) Vehicle Operating Cost (VOC) savings for vehicular traffic using the project road; (b) time savings for passenger and goods carried in transit; and (c) economic benefits due to improved road safety.

16. The economic analysis of the project indicates that the EIRRs of all selected roads are above 12%, and ENPVs of all selected roads are positive at a 12 percent discount rate over a twenty-year evaluation period.

CRN (length) subject to multi-year combined maintenance and safety contractsUnit of measure: Km


This indicator originally included km length to be developed under 130 km OPRC, 60km DBFOMT and 30 km SCDP, as well as about 300 km works outside GSHPII. Outcome attributed to corridors outside the project to be dropped (300 km as of now). Revision also includes 103.2 km OPRC, 60.75 km DBFOMT, and 22.5 km SCDP. Additional corridors 61.8 km Mehsana-Palanpur, 5.0 km Mehsana Bypass, 60.4 Radhanpur-Chanasma and 27.0 km Vallabhipur-Ranghola aggregating to 340.66 km.


Economic Viability Analysis - Base case S. No. Name of Road/ Corridor EIRR (%) ENPV (INR Million)1-a Chanasma - Harij 74% 3,5541-b Harij - Radhanpur 60% 4,7232-1 Mehsana – Palanpur 47% 6,3172-2 Mehsana Bypass 20% 5103 Vallabhipur-Ranghola 41% 957

17. Social Safeguards: As the rehabilitation/strengthening and widening work of the proposed corridors will be undertaken within the existing Right of Way (RoW), there will be no land acquisition. However, few encroachments (commercial and mixed) along the corridors, particularly on Mehsana- Palanpur and Mehsana Bypass are likely to be affected due to widening of roads. Further, the project may impact community owned assets and livestock movement (cattle and goats) along the roads in some areas. In accordance with the existing Resettlement Policy Framework and World Bank’s OP/BP 4.12. on Involuntary Resettlement, Resettlement Action Plans (RAPs) for Mehsana- Palanpur and Mehsana Bypass will be prepared to cover entitlements of non-titleholders (encroachers and squatters) and relocation of community assets. Similarly, Social Management Plan (SMPs) will be developed for Chanasma-Harij-Sami-Radhanpur and Vallabhipur-Ranghola (Via Dhola & Parvala) to minimize potential impacts resulting from rehabilitation/strengthening works on the said corridors. No physical and economic displacement is expected from the civil work of these roads. A Labour Influx Management Plan will be included in RAP and SMP. The contractors will submit site specific action plan to ensure that the labour follows the code of conduct. This would be monitored including the compliance with with all applicable labor laws by the Project.

18. In context of the project to address the issues related to Gender based violence at work place, an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) to address complaints of sexual harassment in accordance with the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal Act, 2013 (SHWW Act 2013) will be constituted. The R&BD, contractors and other consultants engaged on the project would also be required to establish their respective Internal Complaints Committees.

19. All social safeguard instruments for additional investments will be disclosed as per the World Bank’s policy on disclosure. The RAPs and SMPs will be reviewed and cleared by the Bank prior to clearance of the bid documents.

20. None of the roads pass through Schedule V areas of Gujarat and thereby World Bank’s OP/BP 4.10 on Indigenous Peoples will not be applicable. Overall, the improvement of the proposed corridors is likely to have a long-term impact for the community benefitting from greater mobility and trade facilitation, especially in economically viable districts such as Mehsana.

21. Environmental Safeguards: The additional investments to be covered under the proposed project restructuring will follow the same approach, management instruments and institutional arrangements as that agreed and implemented for the original project. The Environment Management Framework (EMF), prepared for the original project, will continue to be applicable for the restructured project along with the application of the screening protocol for upfront identification of any significant environmental issues. No new environment safeguard policies are being triggered. The proposed strengthening and widening work of the road corridors will be largely confined to the existing Right of Way (RoW). Based on the on-going environmental assessments, it is envisaged that the potential environmental impacts would include: (a) felling of roadside trees; (b) impact on local drainage; (c) possible effect on water resources during construction stage; (d) impacts on existing religious/cultural properties, mainly relating to road side shrines; and (e) construction related Environment, Health, and Safety (EHS) impacts. Environmental Assessments (EAs) will be


conducted for the three roads proposed for widening/major rehabilitation under project restructuring. The EAs will also assess potential climate change impacts and suggest appropriate measures to be incorporated in the sub-project design, as needed in the light of site conditions. Corridor specific EMPs to minimize and mitigate impacts will be prepared and appropriately integrated into the Bidding Documents. The environmental measures in this regard are mainly related to defining the environmental management standards to be met by the contractors during execution of works. For the new Safe Corridor Demonstration Project (Gandhinagar to Indira Bridge), an EMP with appropriate environment, health and safety measures will be prepared and integrated into the Bidding Documents to address worksite management issues that of concern for this corridor. All instruments/reports prepared for the new investments (additional sub-projects) will be disclosed in line with Bank policy requirements.

IV.SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Changed Not Changed

Results Framework ✔

Components and Cost ✔

Loan Closing Date(s) ✔

Reallocation between Disbursement Categories ✔

Disbursement Estimates ✔

Legal Covenants ✔

Implementation Schedule ✔

Economic and Financial Analysis ✔

Technical Analysis ✔

Social Analysis ✔

Environmental Analysis ✔

Implementing Agency ✔

DDO Status ✔

Project's Development Objectives ✔

Cancellations Proposed ✔

Disbursements Arrangements ✔

Overall Risk Rating ✔

Safeguard Policies Triggered ✔

EA category ✔

Institutional Arrangements ✔


Financial Management ✔

Procurement ✔

Other Change(s) ✔

IV. DETAILED CHANGE(S)

OPS_DETAILEDCHANGES_COMPONENTS_TABLE

COMPONENTS

Current Component Name

Current Cost

(US$M)Action Proposed

Component NameProposed

Cost (US$M)

Highway Improvement Component 290.00 Revised Highway Improvement

Component 299.50

Sector Policy and Institutional Development Component 12.00 Revised Sector Policy and Institutional

Development Component 16.50

Road safety Improvement Component 22.00 Revised Road safety Improvement

Component 27.70

TOTAL 324.00 343.70

OPS_DETAILEDCHANGES_LOANCLOSING_TABLE

LOAN CLOSING DATE(S)

Ln/Cr/Tf StatusOriginal Closing

Revised Closing(s)

Proposed Closing

Proposed Deadline for Withdrawal

Applications

IBRD-83130 Effective 31-Jan-2019 31-Dec-2020 30-Apr-2021

OPS_DETAILEDCHANGES_REALLOCATION _TABLE

REALLOCATION BETWEEN DISBURSEMENT CATEGORIES

Current Allocation Actuals + Committed Proposed Allocation Financing %(Type Total)

Current Proposed

IBRD-83130-001 | Currency: USD

iLap Category Sequence No: 1 Current Expenditure Category: Gds,Wks,NCS,CS,Wkshp,Trng A1 B C

127,562,500.00 54,841,678.67 128,662,500.00 62.00 62.00


iLap Category Sequence No: 2 Current Expenditure Category: Gds,Wks,NCS,CS,Wkshp,Trng Comp A2

47,000,000.00 12,335,351.71 45,900,000.00 100.00 100.00

Total 174,562,500.00 67,177,030.38 174,562,500.00

OPS_DETAILEDCHANGES_DISBURSEMENT_TABLE

DISBURSEMENT ESTIMATES

Change in Disbursement EstimatesYes

Year Current Proposed

2014 5,000,000.00 6,000,000.00

2015 18,000,000.00 18,000,000.00

2016 36,000,000.00 20,000,000.00

2017 34,000,000.00 6,500,000.00

2018 45,000,000.00 16,000,000.00

2019 37,000,000.00 28,000,000.00

2020 0.00 55,000,000.00

2021 0.00 25,000,000.00

OPS_DETAILEDCHANGES_LEGCOV_TABLE

LEGAL COVENANTS

Loan/Credit/TF Description Status Action

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Institutional Arrangements | Description :Gujarat to maintain the Committee of Secretaries, Project Implementation Unit, and Road Safety Steering Committee throughout the Project implementation period. | Frequency :CONTINUOUS

Complied with No Change

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Project Management Consultant (PMC) | Description :Gujarat to engage the services of a Project Management Consultant, to assist the PIU in overall monitoring of the Project activities, no later than



four (4) months from the effective date of the legal agreements and thereafter maintain throughout the period of implementation of the Project. | Due Date: 19-Jul-2014 and CONTINUOUS

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Project Documents | Description :Gujarat shall implement the Project in accordance with the Project Implementation Manual, the FM Manual, the IDAP, the GAAP, and the Safeguard Documents, and refrain from amending, suspending, waiving and/or voiding any of these documents without the prior written concurrence of the Bank. | Frequency :CONTINUOUS


IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Construction Supervision Consultant | Description :Gujarat to engage the services of a Construction Supervision Consultant, to assist the PIU with the management and supervision of construction contracts under Part A.1 of the Project, no later than one (1) month from the effective date of the legal agreements and thereafter maintain throughout the period of implementation of the Project. | Due Date: 19-Apr-2014 and CONTINUOUS


IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Design and Monitoring Consultant (OPRC) | Description :Gujarat to engage the services of a design and monitoring consultant to assist the PIU with the design and monitoring of the Output and Performance Based Contract under Component A.2 of the Project, no later than eight (8) months from the effective date of the legal agreements and thereafter maintain throughout the period of implementation of the Project. | Due Date:19-Nov-2014

After delay complied with No Change

IBRD-83130 Finance Agreement :Chartered Accountants (Internal Audit) | Description :Gujarat to engage the services of a firm of qualified chartered accountants, to assist the PIU with internal audit functions for the Project, ensure compliance with internal control mechanisms, and monitor payments for high value contracts and transactions, no later than six (6) months from the effective date of the legal agreements and thereafter



maintain throughout the period of implementation o | Frequency :CONTINUOUS

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Road Safety Monitoring and Evaluation System | Description :Gujarat shall, by March 31, 2017, develop a functional road safety monitoring and evaluation system for the road safety demonstration corridor(s). | Due Date :31-Mar-2017

Not complied with Revised

ProposedGujarat shall, by March 31, 2019, develop a functional road safety monitoring and evaluation system for the road safety demonstration corridor(s).

Not yet due

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Compliance with safeguards Policy / Documents | Description :Gujarat shall carry out the Project in accordance and compliance with the Safeguard Documents and refrain from taking any action which would prevent or interfere with implementation of the Safeguard Documents, without prior written concurrence of the Bank. Whenever an additional or revised EIA, EMP, SIA and/or RAP is required for any proposed Project activity, Gujarat shall, (i) prior to the comm | Frequency :CONTINUOUS


IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Government Permits / Clearances | Description :Gujarat shall ensure that prior to commencement of civil works on any road, or section thereof, all necessary governmental permits/clearances have been obtained, and all conditions imposed under such permits or clearances have been fulfilled/met. | Frequency :CONTINUOUS


IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Safeguards Reporting and Monitoring | Description :Gujarat shall (i) maintain monitoring and evaluation protocols and record-keeping procedures adequate to enable supervision and assessment of implementation/compliance with Safeguard Documents; and (ii) report on a quarterly basis on compliance with Safeguard | Frequency :Quarterly



IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Suggestion and Compliant Handling Mechanism | Description :Gujarat shall maintain complaints handling procedures, incorporating a centralized monitoring system, to address suggestions, complaints, and inquiries, as well a district-level grievance redress mechanism for resettlement and rehabilitation in accordance with the RAPs. | Frequency :CONTINUOUS


IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Institutional and Road safety Improvements | Description :Gujarat shall, by June 30, 2017, apply the enhanced GRMS in the planning and budgeting decisions of R&BD, including through the placement of 200 Kms of core road network in a multi-year maintenance and safety contracting structure. | Due Date :30-Jun-2017

Not complied with Revised

Proposed

Gujarat shall, by no later than June 30, 2020, apply the enhanced GRMS in the planning and budgeting decisions of R&BD, including through the placement of at least 200 kilometers of core road network under a multi-year maintenance and safety contracting structure.

Not yet due

IBRD-83130

Finance Agreement :Enforcement of Road traffic laws and Regulations | Description :Gujarat shall ensure that (i) all Eligible Expenditures under Component C of the Project are used exclusively for the sole purpose of enforcing road traffic laws and regulations and shall not be used for purposes of enforcing any non-road traffic related laws or regulation; (ii) the Loan shall not be used to support the investigation, prosecution, and/or enforcing of judgments that, ex ante, targe | Frequency :CONTINUOUS



.

Results framework

COUNTRY: IndiaSecond Gujarat State Highway Project (GSHP II)

Project Development Objectives(s)

The project development objective is to improve capacity, and enhance quality and safety of road services for the users of the coreroad network of state highways in Gujarat, through institutional strengthening and efficient contracting and financing strategies.

Project Development Objective Indicators by Objectives/ OutcomesRESULT_FRAME_TBL_PDO

Indicator Name DLI Baseline End Target

2014 2019

To improve capacity of road services of the core road network of state highways in Gujarat (Action: This Objective is New)

Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads (Percentage) 43.00 75.00

Action: This indicator has been Revised

Size of the total classified network (Kilometers) 6,444.00 6,444.00

Reduced average travel time on project roads (Text) Cars - 75 minutes / 50 Km length

Trucks - 85 minutes / 50 Km length

Cars- 50 minutes / 50 Km length

Trucks - 65 minutes / 50 Km length

Reduced Average Volume/Capacity (V/C) Ratio on project roads (Text) 0.33 0.25

To enhance quality and safety of road services of the core road network of state highways in Gujarat (Action: This Objective is New)

Number of annual fatalities on safe corridor(s) (Text) 9 (B-D Corridor)

9 (G-I Corridor)

7 (B-D Corridor)

7 (G-I Corridor)


RESULT_FRAME_TBL_PDO


2014 2019


PDO Table SPACE

Intermediate Results Indicators by ComponentsRESULT_FRAME_TBL_IO


2014 2019

Component A - Highway Improvement (Action: This Component is New)

Roads constructed, non-rural (Kilometers) 0.00 460.70


Roads rehabilitated, Non-rural (Kilometers) 0.00 292.80


Length of road developed under innovative contracting methods (Kilometers) 0.00 318.16


CRN (length) subject to multi-year combined maintenance and safety contracts (Kilometers) 0.00 340.66


Component B - Sector POlicy and Institutional Development (Action: This Component is New)

Satisfactory implementation of agreed Action Plan for institutional development and governance improvement (Text) IDAP and GAAP endorsed All major IDAP and GAAP targets met or resolved


Component C - Road Safety Management (Action: This Component is New)


RESULT_FRAME_TBL_IO


2014 2019

Safety Demonstration Corridor, complying with a minimum iRAP star rating of 3 developed (Kilometers) 0.00 22.50


M&E system for Safety Demonstration Corridor developed and used regularly (Text) Non-existent M&E System being used to measure the targets set


IO Table SPACE

.


Note to Task Teams: End of system generated content, document is editable from here.


Annex 1Project Development Objective Indicators

Cumulative Target Values

Indicator Name Core Unit ofMeasure Baseline YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4

(Q2)End

TargetFrequency Data Source/

Methodology

Responsibility

for Data Collection

Target 48% 60%Percenta

ge 43% Actual44.5% 48% 49.1% 49.1%1

Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads

Proposed Change 75%2

Baseline, MidTerm and End of Project

Policy Planning

Unit, R&BD

R&BD

Size of the total classified network Km 6444 6444 6444 6444 6444 6444 R&BD Data

Target

Cars-75m

Trucks-85 m

Cars - 50 m

Trucks-65 m

Reduced average travel time on project roads

Text

Cars-75minutes/50 km length,

Trucks-85

minutes/50 km length

Actual Cars-60mTrucks-70m

Cars-60m

Trucks-70m4

To be provided by

PMC

At Baseline, MidTerm and Yr5 (End-term)

DPRs and ex- post

evaluation study3

R&BD, DPR Consultants

Target 0.22 0.25Reduced Average Volume/Capacity (V/C) Ratio on project roads

Text 0.33Actual

n/a n/a 0.2 0.25

At Baseline, MidTermand Yr5(End-term)

DPRs at preparationand ex-post evaluation

study

R&BD, DPR Consultants

1 175 km (Rehab, non-rural) + 230 km (Widening/Strengthening). 74% of roads are in good and fair condition overall (including non-project road network).2 The contribution of improvement under this project will be equivalent of 12% increase. 3 Travel speed survey is carried out for each of the completed packages and take the average4 As measured at mid-term review for NCB1/3/4/5/6/7/8/9. Remaining packages are NCB/02B, DBFOMT, OPRC. The results are higher as speed breaking measures such as rumble strips and table top crossings are added.5 As measured at mid-term.


Cumulative Target Values

Indicator Name Core Unit ofMeasure Baseline YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4

(Q2)End

TargetFrequency Data Source/

Methodology

Responsibility

for Data Collection

Target

13 (A-V Corridor)9 (B-D

Corridor)

11 (A-V Corridor)

7 (B-D Corridor)

Text

13 (A-V Corridor)

9 (B-D Corridor)

Actual N/A N/A N/A

(to be measured in Yr 5)

Baseline,Yr4 and Yr5 (End Term) Annually (targets to be evaluated on 3 year moving average)

(a) Police Records (b)

M&E Report on

Safe Corridor Project

R&BD, Consultant

Number of annual fatalities on safe corridor(s)

Proposed change

- 9 (B-D Corridor)

- 9 (G-I Corridor)6

Target - 7 (B-D)- 7 (G-I)

Baseline,Yr5 and End Term Annually (targets to be evaluated on 3 year moving average)

6 Ankleshwar-Valia corridor was declared as National Highway and hence proposed to be dropped and replaced with Gandhinagar-Indira Bridge corridor (G-I corridor)


Intermediate Results IndicatorsCumulative Target ValuesIndicator Name Core

Unit ofMeasure

Baseline

YR1 YR2 YR3 YR4 EndTarget

FrequencyData Source/Methodology

Responsibilityfor Data

Collection

Target 100 3508

Km 0.00 Actual0 155 230 2309

At Baseline, MidTermand Yr5 (End-term)

Ex-PostEvaluation R&BD

Roads constructed, non- rural7

Proposed change Target 460.710

At Baseline, MidTerm, Yr5 and End-term

Target 30

Km 0.00 Actual 0 0 0 011

AtBaseline, Mid-Term and Yr5 (End-term)

Mid-TermReview, Ex-

Post Evaluation,

iRAP Surveys

R&BD, Consultants

Safety Demonstration Corridor, complying with a minimum iRAP star rating of 3 developed


AtBaseline, Yr5 and End-term

7 ‘Non-rural’ means roads except Major District Road (MDR), Other District Road (ODR), and Village Road (VR).8 Includes 260 km of widening and strengthening corridors, 60 km of DBFOMT, and 27 km of OPRC (Dhandhuka-Dhorela stretch). 9 Further progress would depend on completion of NCB 2B, as well as the OPRC and DBFOMT contracts. 10 The proposed change is after adding 46 km of Dhandhuka-Paliyad stretch under OPRC which has been converted into widening & strengthening (instead of only strengthening) and adding M-P corridor (61.8 km) and Mehsana bypass (5.0 km)


Cumulative Target ValuesIndicator Name CoreUnit of

Measure

Baseline




Collection

Target

M&E System

being used to measure the targets

set

M&E system for Safety Demonstration Corridor developed and used regularly

Text Non - existent

Actual N/A N/A N/A N/A13

At Baseline, Mid-Term and Yr5 (End-term)

DemonstrationCorridor

M&E Plan

R&BD, Consultants

Target 75 27514

Km 0.00Actual

128 175 175 17515

At Baseline, Mid-Termand Yr5 (End-term)

Ex-PostEvaluation R&BD

Roads rehabilitated, Non-rural



Target 0 60 190Length of road

developed under innovative contracting methods

Km 0.00 Actual 0 0 017


Signedcontracts, Project Progress Reports

R&BD, GoG

11 Civil Works for B-D: Under construction.12 New target consists of B-D corridor (11km) and G-I corridor (11.5 km). A-W corridor (19 km) will be dropped.13 Second attempt in the procurement didn’t succeed, and the consultancy to be rebid.14 Includes 175 km of rehabilitation corridors, and 100km under OPRC (46 km for Dhandhuka-Paliad and 54 km for Dhanduka-Surendranagar).15 Further progress would depend upon the pace of progress on the OPRC contract.16 End target proposed to be revised to 205.4 km after reducing 27 km under OPRC (Limbdi-Surendranagar, dropped), as well as 46 km (Dhandhuka-Paliyad, converted into W&S) and adding Radhnapur-Chansma (60.4 km) and Vallbhipur-Ranghola (27 km)17 DBFOMT Concessionaire likely to complete 6-month before scheduled completion of February 2019. OPRC bidding process underway and contractor to be on board by November 2018.


Cumulative Target ValuesIndicator Name CoreUnit of

Measure

Baseline




Collection



Target

All major IDAP and

GAAP targets met or resolved

Satisfactory implementation of agreed Action Plan for institutional development and governance improvement

Text IDAP and GAAP endorsed

Actual In progress In progress19

At Baseline, Mid-Term and Yr5 (End-term)

Project progress reports, consultant reports

R&BD, Consultants

Target 50020

Km 0.00Actual

0 0 0 021


Ex-PostEvaluation R&BDCRN (length)

subject to multi- year combined maintenance and safety contracts Proposed

change Target 340.6622AtBaseline, Yr5 and End-term

18 End target proposed to be revised after changing OPRC from 130 km to 103.2 km, plus DBFOMT 60.75 km and adding additional corridors about 154.2 km (Includes 61.8 km M-P, 5 km Mehsana bypass, 60.4 km R-C and 27 km V-R). Reduction is for 23 km for Limbdi-Surendranagar, 4 km section in Limbdi -Dhandhuka.19 Study for R&BD ICT-MIS Strategy & Action completed and given ‘in-principle’ GoG endorsement for implementation action. IDAP-1 and IDAP-3 completed - some of the recommendations have been approved by R&BD and others are in progress. IDAP-2 on track in terms of capacity building activities and milestone deliverables actions.20 This indicator includes km length to be developed under 130 km OPRC, 60 km DBFOMT and 30 km SCDP, as well as about 300 km works outside GSHP II. 21 DBFOMT Concessionaire on board and near achieving first milestone. OPRC Engineer finalizing bid documents. Civil Works for B-D: under construction.22 Outcome attributed to outside the project to be dropped (300 km as of now). Includes 103.2 km OPRC, 60.75 km DBFOMT, and 22.5 km SCDP (11+11.5) and additional corridors 154.2 km includes 61.8 km Mehsana-Palanpur, 60.4km M-P and 5.0 km Mehsana bypass, 60.4 km Radhanpur-Chansma and 27 km Vallabhipur-Ranghola.