world bank document...d. sector and theme codes original actual sector code (as % of total bank...
TRANSCRIPT
Document of
The World Bank
Report No: ICR00001753
IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT
(IDA-46440)
ON A
CREDIT
IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR323 MILLION
(US$ 500 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
TO THE
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
FOR A
DEVELOPMENT POLICY CREDIT
February 28, 2011
Finance and Private Sector Development
Africa Region
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
(Exchange Rate Effective February 19, 2010)
Currency Unit = Nigerian Naira (NGN)
NGN 1.00 = US$ 0.0066
US$ 1.00 = NGN 152.2070
FISCAL YEAR
January 1 – December 31
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
ABBREVIATIONS
AML/CTF Anti-Money Laundering/Combating of Terrorist Financing
ATRRS Accounting Transactional Recording and Reporting System
BPP Bureau of Public Procurement
CAC Company Affairs Commission
CBN Central Bank of Nigeria
CDD Community Driven Development
CPIA Country Policy and Institutional Assessment
CPS Country Partnership Strategy
CRMS Credit Risk Management System
CSCS Central Securities and Clearing Systems
CSOs Civil Society Organizations
DMO Debt Management Office
DPC Development Policy Credit
ECA Excess Crude Oil Account e-FASS Enhanced Financial Analysis and Surveillance System
EFCC Economic and Financial Crimes Commission
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
FDI Foreign Direct Investment
FIRS Federal Inland Revenue Service
FIRST Financial Sector Reform and Strengthening
FGN Federal Government of Nigeria
FPD Finance and Private Sector
FRA Fiscal Responsibility Act
FSS2020 Financial Sector Strategy 2020
GDP Gross Domestic Product
GIFMIS Government Integrated Financial Management Information System
GTZ Gesellschaft fur Teknische Zusammenarbejde
IDA International Development Association
IFRS International Financial Reporting Standards
IFC International Finance Corporation
IMF International Monetary Fund
IPO Initial Public Offering
IPSAS International Public Sector Accounting Standard
M & E Monitoring and Evaluation
MDAs Ministries, Departments and Agencies
MDG Millennium Development Goals
MFB Microfinance Bank
NACRDB National Agricultural and Co-operative Development Bank
NAICOM National Insurance Commission
NASB Nigerian Accounting Standards Board
NDIC Nigerian Deposit Insurance Corporation
NEEDS Nigeria Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy
NEITI Nigeria Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative
NLSS Nigeria Living Standards Survey
NSE Nigerian Stock Exchange
PEMFAR Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review
PENCOM National Pension Commission
PFM Public Financial Management
PPP Public Private Partnerships
PREM Poverty Reduction and Economic Management
PSI - Policy Support Instrument
RTGS Real-Time Gross Settlement
SAS Nigerian Accounting Standards
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
SMEs Small and Medium Enterprises
TSA Treasury Single Account
VFM Value For Money
Vice President Obiageli K. Ezekwesili
Country Director Onno Ruhl
Sector Director Marilou Uy / Marcelo Giugale
Sector Manager Paul Noumba Um / Jan Walliser
Task Team Leader Michael Fuchs / Volker Treichel
ICR Team Leader Ismail Radwan
ICR Team Members Gloria Joseph-Raji, Pierre Strauss,
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
Development Policy Credit
CONTENTS
Data Sheet
A. Basic Information
B. Key Dates
C. Ratings Summary
D. Sector and Theme Codes
E. Bank Staff
F. Results Framework Analysis
G. Ratings of Program Performance in ISRs
H. Restructuring
1. Program Context, Development Objectives and Design ............................................ 1
2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes .............................................. 9
3. Assessment of Outcomes .......................................................................................... 15
4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome ......................................................... 36
5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance ..................................................... 38
6. Lessons Learned........................................................................................................ 43
7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners........... 44
Annex 1. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes ............. 45
Annex 2. Nigeria Country at a Glance .......................................................................... 46
Annex 3. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results ................................................... 47
Annex 4. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR ..................... 48
Annex 5. Comments of Cofinanciers and Other Partners/Stakeholders ....................... 49
Annex 6. List of Supporting Documents ...................................................................... 50
MAP…………………………………………………………………………………...53
i
A. Basic Information
Country: Nigeria Program Name:
Financial Sector and Public Financial Management Development Policy Credit
Program ID: P117088 L/C/TF Number(s): IDA-46440
ICR Date: 02/28/2011 ICR Type: Core ICR
Lending Instrument: DPL Borrower: THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA
Original Total Commitment:
XDR 323.0M Disbursed Amount: XDR 323.0M
Revised Amount: XDR 323.0M
Implementing Agencies: Federal Ministry of Finance
Central Bank of Nigeria
Cofinanciers and Other External Partners:
B. Key Dates
Process Date Process Original Date Revised / Actual Date(s)
Concept Review: 05/15/2009 Effectiveness: 01/06/2010
Appraisal: 06/08/2009 Restructuring(s):
Approval: 07/28/2009 Mid-term Review:
Closing: 06/30/2010 06/30/2010
C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR
Outcomes: Satisfactory
Risk to Development Outcome: Substantial
Bank Performance: Satisfactory
Borrower Performance: Satisfactory
C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR) Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings
Quality at Entry: Satisfactory Government: Satisfactory
Quality of Supervision: Satisfactory Implementing Agency/Agencies:
Highly Satisfactory
Overall Bank Performance:
Satisfactory Overall Borrower Performance:
Satisfactory
ii
C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators
Implementation Performance
Indicators QAG Assessments (if any)
Rating:
Potential Problem Program at any time (Yes/No):
No Quality at Entry (QEA):
None
Problem Program at any time (Yes/No):
No Quality of Supervision (QSA):
None
DO rating before Closing/Inactive status:
Satisfactory
D. Sector and Theme Codes Original Actual
Sector Code (as % of total Bank financing)
Banking 30 30
General finance sector 20 20
General public administration sector 50 50
Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing)
Debt management and fiscal sustainability 20 20
Macroeconomic management 30 30
Other financial and private sector development 30 30
Regulation and competition policy 20 20
E. Bank Staff Positions At ICR At Approval
Vice President: Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili
Country Director: Onno Ruhl Onno Ruhl
Sector Manager: Paul Noumba Um Iradj A. Alikhani
Program Team Leader: Michael J. Fuchs Michael J. Fuchs
ICR Team Leader: Ismail Radwan
ICR Primary Author: Ismail Radwan
F. Results Framework Analysis Program Development Objectives (from Project Appraisal Document) In responding to the on-going global financial crisis the credit is intended to provide budgetary support to the Federal Government of Nigeria to offset the fiscal impact of the crisis and support the Government in maintaining its current economic reform path in the
iii
financial sector, fiscal policy, management and governance. The three program objectives are: (i) maintaining confidence and stability in the Financial System; (ii) strengthening the Banking System; and (iii) supporting the objectives of the 2009 budget focused on raising Government investment spending to accelerate non-oil growth. Revised Program Development Objectives (if any, as approved by original approving authority)
(a) PDO Indicator(s)
Indicator Baseline Value
Original Target Values (from
approval documents)
Formally Revised Target Values
Actual Value Achieved at
Completion or Target Years
Indicator 1 : Measures to stabilize the banking system
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
Extended Discount Window (EDW) in place & heavy borrowing from banks at around N480bn/day; Liquidity ratio req. at 25%; Reserve req. at 1%; Monetary policy rate at 6%.
Banking system liquidity restored; borrowing at EDW below N200bn/day; parallel US$/N rate within 10% of interbank rate;reduces Liquidity Ratio to 25%, Reserve Ratio to1%, MPR to 8%.
The extended discount window was shut down. The parallel exchange market has disappeared.
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
100% achieved.
Indicator 2 : Strengthening the banking system.
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
Timetable on IFRS adoption (by Jan 2012) & common financial year-end for banks; plan to introduce consolidated risk-based supervision; resident inspectors placed.
Banking system more sound & transaprent.CAR above 15% through 2009; improved reporting/accounting encourages investment in bank debt.
A timetable to implement IFRS by 2012 has been adopted. Capital adequacy was 16.8 by end 2009.
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
100% achieved.
iv
Indicator 3 : Federal Government expenditure in % of non-oil GDP.
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
FGN expenditure in 2006, 2007 & 2008 was 14.4, 17.8 & 17.3% of non-oil GDP respectively.
FGN expenditure in 2010 is within range of 14-18% of non-oil GDP.
In 2009 Federal Government Expenditure was 19.8% (of non-oil GDP) and a further 4.3% was sourced from the ECA.
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
100% achieved.
Indicator 4 : Execution rate of federal capital budget
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
FGN capital budget execution rate was 50.7% in 2008.
Capital budget implementation moves to above 60% in 2010.
Capital budget execution in 2009 was 72%
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
100% achieved.
Indicator 5 : Number of FGN MDAs producing their month-end financial statements within 7 days using ATRRS.
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
15% of FGN MDAs producing month-end financial statements within 7 days using ATRRS in 2008.
Over 75% of of FGN MDAs produce month-end financial statements within 7 days using ATRRS.
67% of FGN MDAs produced month-end financial statements within 7 days at the completion of the implementation period.
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
By December 2010, 77% of MDAs are producing financial statements within 7 days.
Indicator 6 : Number of national government contracts using national standard bidding documents. Number of FGN contract awards above N75ml that are published.
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
45% of FGN government contracts using national standard bidding documents and 90% of FGN contract awards above N75ml published in 2008.
Public procurement act & implementation regulations consistent with international best practice, operational & public. Contract awards published in national procurement
65% of FGN contracts are using national standard bidding documents. And 100% of FGN contract awards above N75 million are published.
v
Journal & BPP website.
Date achieved 08/30/2008 06/30/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
100% achieved.
(b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s)
Indicator Baseline Value
Original Target Values (from
approval documents)
Formally Revised
Target Values
Actual Value Achieved at
Completion or Target Years
Indicator 1 : There are no intermediate indicators for this DPL - it will close on June 30, 2010
Value (quantitative or Qualitative)
none none
Date achieved 03/24/2010 06/30/2010 Comments (incl. % achievement)
G. Ratings of Program Performance in ISRs
No. Date ISR Archived DO IP
Actual Disbursements (USD millions)
1 12/31/2009 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00 2 03/27/2010 Satisfactory Satisfactory 507.52
H. Restructuring (if any) Not Applicable
1
1. Program Context, Development Objectives and Design
1.1 Context at Appraisal
Nigeria’s macroeconomic context in late 2008 / early 2009
1. Nigeria is Africa’s most populous nation, the world’s 8th
largest oil-producer, but
remains one of the poorest nations in the world (140th
in terms of GDP per capita).
2. Nigeria’s economy grew rapidly over the past decade. Nigeria returned to
democratic governance in 1999, after 16 years of military rule, and has enjoyed a decade
of relative peace and prosperity since then. The strong economic performance was driven
primarily by non-oil growth which reached an annual growth rate of 9 percent. Greater
attention was also paid to improving the investment climate, strengthening governance
and boosting investments in privatized sectors such as telecoms. Combined, these
measures attracted increasing capital inflows (including remittances and foreign direct
investment), and stimulated domestic demand.
3. Prudent economic management enabled the acceleration of non-oil growth.
The management of oil revenues was enhanced with the introduction of an oil-price
based fiscal rule, for government expenditure, in 2004. Under the rule, government
adopted a conservative oil reference price and saved surplus oil revenues in the Excess
Crude Account (ECA). Nigeria’s economic profile was also greatly improved by its
successful efforts to secure the largest debt write-off in the history of the Paris Club
reducing its external debt from US$33 billion in 2003 to just US$3.5 billion in 2006.
4. Over the years, Nigeria’s government has been committed to improved
macroeconomic policies and better governance. Recent progress is reflected in a
sharply improved rating on the World Bank's Country Policy and Institutional
Assessment (CPIA) which rose from 2.8 in 2006 to 3.4 in 2010. In the area of public
financial management, the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) and new Procurement Law
were enacted in 2007 at the Federal level and similar laws are being adopted by all the
states. The Accounting Transactional Recording and Reporting System (ATRRS), and a
computerized Federal payroll management system were launched. Preparation of the
Government Integrated Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS) had gained
pace and an E-payment system introduced in 2008 promised to increase transparency and
accountability further. To improve governance of the oil and gas sector, Nigeria adopted
and is implementing the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (NEITI).
5. Financial sector reforms have also contributed to improved economic
performance. Major reform of the financial sector started in 2004 with a 13-point
reform agenda issued and implemented by the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). Among
important reforms undertaken in the financial sector were the complete overhaul of the
Nigerian pension system (initiated in 2004) and the establishment of the debt
management office responsible for developing the market for government securities. The
recent development of a roadmap to implement the Financial System Strategy 2020
2
(FSS2020) contributed significantly to reform and strengthening of the non-bank
financial sector. Parallel initiatives were also undertaken to increase transparency and
reduce corruption through the establishment of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC).
6. A high degree of oil dependence makes Nigeria vulnerable to swings in
commodity prices. Oil accounts for more than 95 percent of export earnings, 85 percent
of government revenues and about 20 percent of GDP. Although sectors other than oil
have accounted for the largest share of economic growth, these sectors (trade, agriculture,
and telecommunications) have also expanded from rapid growth in domestic demand that
can be at least indirectly associated with oil-related inflows.
7. During 2007-2008, risks in the banking sector escalated in the context of an
asset price bubble. During 2004-2006, the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) dramatically
raised the minimum capital requirements for a universal banking license from N2.5 to
N25 billion. Small banks exited the market, others merged and all the survivors looked
to raise capital on the stock market. In an effort to attain – and in many cases exceed –
the CBN’s new higher minimum capital requirement bank managers, exploited the lax
regulatory climate and provided margin loans to their customers, allowing them to
purchase bank shares on credit. Many customers used the margin loans to adopt highly
leveraged positions.
8. By the beginning of 2008, the Nigerian stock market had become hugely
overvalued, with a price earnings ratio of 57 (4th
highest in the world), and more than 70
percent of the stock market capitalization was accounted for by banks that had used
margin loans to artificially inflate their share prices. This exposed the domestic banking
sector directly to risks from the corresponding asset price bubble. As stock prices fell
rapidly, customers defaulted on the margin loans which came to account for a large part
of the banks’ non-performing loan (NPL) portfolio. The extent of this exposure was not
known in Nigeria until the Central Bank carried out special inspections in the second half
of 2009 as the banks had systematically concealed their losses.. These special
inspections also revealed that banks had sizeable non-performing loan exposures inter
alia to the downstream oil sector. As a result of the special inspections reported NPLs
rose from less than 5% in 2008 to close to 60% by end 2009.
Impact of the Global Financial Crisis
9. Given the country’s high oil dependence, the global financial crisis, and
associated collapse of commodity prices, presented a major threat to hard won
economic and political stability in Nigeria. The sharp and rapid decline of oil prices
from almost 150 to under 40 dollars a barrel delivered a huge negative shock to the
balance of payments and budgetary position of the country, wiping out surpluses and
creating sizeable deficits. Federal budgetary revenues in 2009 declined by 48 percent
relative to 2008, while gross foreign reserves fell from US$ 60 to 43 billion between June
2008 and June 2009. The deterioration in the balance of payment position reflected not
3
only the direct impact on the current account from lower oil prices, but significant capital
outflows. Capital flows plus errors and omissions in the 2009 Nigeria balance of
payments amounted to a deficit of US$ 22 billion.
10. The external shock was also projected to result in a rapid slow-down of the
non-oil economy and put pressures on the exchange rate. Non-oil growth, which had
reached a range of 8-9 percent was expected to slow down to 3-4 percent in 2009-10,
with adverse consequences for the real economy and employment. In line with the
declining foreign exchange earnings and weakening confidence, the naira entered a
period of sharp depreciation in late 2008 and early 2009, as a result of which the Central
bank resorted to temporary foreign exchange restrictions, generating a substantial wedge
between official and parallel exchange rates. 1
11. A collapse in asset prices left a number of large commercial banks illiquid
and insolvent. Stock market collapses in the world’s financial centers started in May
2008. Developing country stock markets almost immediately flowed suit with the
Morgan Stanley Capital International Market Index falling by 23 percent within a week.
The sharp decline in asset prices in Nigeria made the above-mentioned margin loans non-
performing. These loans had constituted the majority of the massive credit expansion in
the years directly preceding the crisis. Nigeria thereby faced a potential full scale
financial crisis in additional to the enormous balance of payment and budgetary
challenges brought on by the fall in oil prices.
12. Pessimistic predictions from many experts on the extent and duration of the
global economic crisis implied especially high risks and uncertainty for Nigeria.
While Nigeria had succeeded in strengthening its fiscal situation and in building up its
international reserves position as a buffer in the oil boom years, these resources were
limited and could not cope with exceptionally low oil prices over a number of years.
Government’s response to the crisis
13. In response to the economic downturn the Federal Government of Nigeria
(FGN) and the CBN took immediate and proactive actions including; establishing a
Presidential Committee to coordinate FGN’s anti-crisis program; measures to stabilize
the banking system and restore confidence; fiscal adjustments and the design of programs
to offset the impact on the poor; and, administrative reforms designed to improve revenue
collection and the quality and transparency of Government expenditures. Government
also stayed the course on macroeconomic stability measures (including the oil-price
based fiscal rule, targeting growth bottlenecks, containing recurrent costs and wages,
reducing subsidies, and prudent borrowing). All were important to build the confidence
1 The exchange restrictions were eventually removed as part of the policy dialogue under
the DPC.
4
of domestic and international investors in the Government’s ability to maintain stability
and mitigate the crisis.
14. The accumulated Excess Crude Account (ECA) proved to be an important
buffer for meeting the challenges brought on by the global economic crisis. The
ECA, which had accumulated US$ 19 billion in 2008, provided the Government with
some fiscal space, at least in the short term, for preventing a collapse in non-oil growth or
financial markets. Despite the collapse in revenues, federal government spending was
actually increased in 2009 (11.6 percent of GDP) relative to 2008 (11.3 percent). State
revenues were also augmented by measured distributions from the ECA. In addition, the
federal government moved to adjust the composition of spending by capping recurrent
spending and accelerating capital expenditure so as to use the fiscal stimulus for growth-
enhancing investments.
15. High uncertainty about the extent and duration of the global crisis, limited
ECA resources, and unfavorable conditions on international markets made policy-
based IDA borrowing a very attractive option for Nigeria in mid-2009. IDA support
offered support for both better macroeconomic management of the crisis, and for
sustaining or accelerating reforms in the financial sector and of public financial
management.
16. In particular, Government considered the following options:
ECA withdrawals. In light of widespread negative expectations about the world
economy in mid-2009, there was broad consensus that withdrawals from the
ECA needed to be conservative as to preserve additional fiscal buffers should the
crisis be protracted. The need to share ECA withdrawals across all tiers of
government also limited the federal government’s control over the use of the
ECA money once released. In addition, ECA withdrawals were exacerbating
exchange rate pressures as the bulk of ECA resources were held in foreign
exchange.
Domestic financing. Government also was interested to limit its domestic
borrowing so as not to further crowd out private credit.
Accessing foreign capital markets. An initially considered launch of a Eurobond,
which would have accessed foreign savings and avoided exchange pressures and
crowding out, was abandoned due to the unacceptably high borrowing costs in
international capital markets that prevailed at the time.
17. In this constrained context, an IDA Development Policy Credit was very
attractive for Nigeria. It had the added bonus of providing access to World Bank
expertise on policy matters and signaled broad endorsement of the Government’s overall
reform program at a time of generally low investor confidence and considerable political
pressure on the consensus to maintain sound macro policies.
5
Bank analytic work and policy dialogue preceding the crisis
18. The Bank’s response to the Government’s request for support was enabled by
longstanding analytic and project engagement in Nigeria on the financial sector and
public financial management.
19. An FSAP was completed in Nigeria as early as 2002. This was followed by work
in 2005/6 advising on the CBN’s bank consolidation program. Starting in 2006, the Bank
fielded a number of missions in support of Nigeria’s Financial System Strategy 2020
(FSS2020), a broad financial sector reform program led by the CBN. Meanwhile the
Bank’s Economic Reform and Governance Project (ERGP) supported public sector
management reforms since 2005. Subsequently a number of sectoral experts visited
Nigeria completing diagnostic reports on subjects relevant to the DPC including; the
banking sector, capital market development, financial reporting standards, improved
public financial management (including a Public Expenditure Management and Financial
Accountability Review (PEMFAR) report), debt markets and debt management
improvements, review of the capital budget implementation as well as public expenditure
reviews and public expenditure and financial accountability assessments (PEFA).
20. As the global financial crisis deepened in late 2007 and early 2008 the Bank team
became increasingly concerned about imbalances in the Nigerian financial sector. In an
Aide-Memoire dated February 2008 the Bank team highlighted the high concentration of
bank shares on the Nigerian Stock Exchange, poor governance practices at both the NSE
and SEC as well as weaknesses in Nigerian accounting standards and banking
supervision (see Box 1 for an excerpt from the aide-memoire). In subsequent aide-
memoires the Bank team continued to stress the measures that were needed to maintain
the stability of the banking system. In particular the Bank urged the authorities to
undertake a “health check” (special audits to be undertaken according to international
financial reporting standards) of the banking system so as to be able to gauge better the
eventual impact of issues arising from weaknesses in Nigerian reporting and supervisory
practices.
Within this context, the DPC provided an excellent platform to maintain government’s
focus on a program of important, strategic and structural reform elements that had
emerged from solid analysis. The comprehensive base of analytical work and the
accompanying dialogue supporting the process of achieving consensus on key elements
of the DPC program. As a result, the Government and the Bank were able to agree
quickly on the prior actions and indicative outcome indicators for the DPC and the
relevant government authorities quickly moved to implement them.
6
Timeline : Nigeria and the Global Financial Crisis
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140Ja
n-0
5
Jan
-06
Jan
-07
Jan
-08
Jan
-09
Jan
-10
CBN launches FSS2020(World Bank supports)
Crude oil (monthly price US$ per barrel)
CBN banking consolidation underway
ERGP starts Implementation
FMOF makes official request for DPC
DPC approved
Global Stock Market Collapse
Low Point Global Stock
MarketNSE Collapse starts
Exchange reserves peak at US$62 bn
IMF dire predictions for 2009
CBN intervenes inSelected banks
AMCON launched
CBN completes banking sector
consolidation
7
Box 1: Exert from Bank Aide-Memoire, FSS2020 Diagnostic Mission February 28th
2008.
Concerns about Asset Overvaluation. The mission discussed the current high levels of asset prices,
particularly on the stock exchange but also on the housing market with senior staff at the CBN, FMOF and
PenCom. The Governor, although not convinced that Nigerian P/E ratios are out of line, was keenly
interested in an analysis of the current situation. Factors driving asset prices in Nigeria include: (a)
increasing appetite for new investments arising from fully-funded contributory pension schemes
(implementation of reforms enacted in 2004); (b) repatriation of investment funds and increased foreign
investor appetite for 'Nigeria risk'; (c) the hike in minimum capitalization of banks (2006) and insurance
companies (2007) and the accompanying consolidation process; (d) continuing issuer appetite for IPOs
(mostly by banks); and (e) large appetite for equity investment by local retail investors.
The mission has requested the data required to undertake a flow of funds analysis so as to better identify the
factors behind the possible asset price bubble. However, a cursory comparison of P/E ratios, see attached
figure, demonstrates that asset prices are considerably out of line. P/E ratios on the Nigerian Stock
Exchange have recently increased considerably, particularly in the banking sector, while the returns on bank
assets and equity have fallen following the increase in bank capitalization. This raises concerns as to
whether earning prospects in the banking sector will be able to sustain such elevated P/E ratios.
The mission drew attention to the considerable risks to the confidence in the Nigerian financial system and --
by association -- to implementation of FSS 2020 which would arise in the event of any dramatic fall in
confidence and asset values. To avert such risks the mission recommended that the authorities: (a) closely
monitor banks’ investment in equities both on their own balance sheet and on those of their subsidiaries; (b)
introduce consolidated banking supervision (thereby providing a more accurate assessment of banks'
exposure to the equity market through their as yet unconsolidated brokering subsidiaries) ; (c) reduce fees on
listing and transactions of securities, thereby working towards increasing the supply of investment assets,
and (d) review the governance structure of the Nigerian Stock Exchange.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Slo
venia
Cro
ati
a
Isra
el
Bulg
ari
a
Lit
huania
Rom
ania
Czech R
epublic
Ukra
ine
Turk
ey
Russia
Pola
nd
Hungary
Slo
vak R
epublic
Latv
ia
Esto
nia
Chile
Colo
mbia
Peru
Ecuador
Mexic
o
Tri
n. &
Tobago
Bra
zil
Arg
enti
na
Jam
aic
a
Vie
tnam
Chin
a
Indonesia
Bangla
desh
India
Taiw
an,
Chi
na
Mala
ysia
Philip
pin
es
Pakis
tan
Kore
a
Sri
Lanka
Thailand
Saudi Ara
bia
Kuw
ait
Moro
cco
Egypt
Jord
an
Lebanon
Om
an
Qata
r
Bahra
in
Tunis
ia
U.A
.E.
Zim
babw
e
Nig
eri
a
Cote
d'Ivoir
e
Bots
wana
Kenya
Mauri
tius
Nam
ibia
South
Afr
ica
Ghana
P/
E R
ati
o
Emerging Equity Market P/E Ratios as of 1/2008
Source: Emerging Market Database (EMDB) - S&P/IFCG
8
1.2 Original Program Development Objectives (PDO) and Key Indicators (as approved)
21. The original program development objectives reproduced below are found on
page vii of the program appraisal document (IDA Report No:49162-NG):
“In responding to the on-going global financial crisis the credit was intended to provide
budgetary support to the Federal Government of Nigeria to offset the fiscal impact of the
crisis and support the Government in maintaining its current economic reform path in the
financial sector, fiscal policy, public financial management and governance. The three
program development objectives were: (i) maintaining confidence and stability in the
Financial System; (ii) strengthening the Banking System; and (iii) supporting the
objectives of the 2009 budget, focused on raising Government investment spending to
accelerate non-oil growth”.
1.3 Original Policy Areas Supported by the Program
22. The DPC responded to the Government’s need to finance the 2009 deficit in the
context of the on-going financial crisis. It supported government’s economic reform path
in the financial sector, public financial management and governance areas. More
specifically it supported the following policy areas outlined in
23. Table 1 (derived from the table on page vii of the project document,).
Table 1: Policy areas, key outcomes and indicators Policy area Outcomes Indicators Achievements
(a) Maintaining confidence and stability of the banking system
1 Measures to stabilize the banking system
Banking system liquidity is restored and
increased confidence
allows normal functioning of the
interbank markets for Naira and foreign
exchange. Government
debt markets function more efficiently and
become more liquid.
Use of the extended window facility declines from NGN
480 billion/day to below NGN 200 billion/day
Parallel market USD exchange rate falls to within 10% of the
interbank rate).
Achieved: the extended window was shut down in
2010.
Achieved: The exchange
rate discrepancy disappeared and the parallel market has
closed.
2 Strengthening the
banking system
The banking system
becomes more sound and transparent.
Capital adequacy ratios remain above 15 percent through 2009.
Improved reporting and
accounting encourages investment in bank debt &
equity, and better pricing for
debt issuances by banks on
international markets.
Banks' ability to manage risk improved by access to new
sources of credit information).
Achieved: Capital adequacy remained at 16.8 percent.
Achieved: IFRS adopted by
2012. Bank equities have risen by close to 50 percent
from their 2009 lows.
Achieved: The CBN has
licensed 3 credit bureaus that
are now fully functional.
(b) Sustaining growth through sound macroeconomic policies and budget priorities
3 Supporting
macroeconomic stability and non oil
growth through sound
fiscal policies
Sustaining growth is
assured through sound macroeconomic policies
and targeted budget
priorities.
Federal government expenditure in 2009 remains
within a range of 23-25 percent
of non-oil GDP (21.2 in 2008, 25.4 in 2007, 21.4 in 2006).
Achieved: Federal Government expenditure
was 24 percent when
disbursements from the ECA are included.
4 Adjusting expenditure priorities to economic
Sustaining growth is assured through targeted
Execution rate of the federal capital budget (in percent of
Achieved: The execution rate of the federal capital
9
challenges budget priorities and
sound macroeconomic policies.
the 2009 budget as finally
approved by the National Assembly) rises from 53.9
percent in 2008 to more than
60 percent in 2009.
budget reached 71.8 percent
in 2009.
5 Raising non-oil revenue
The federal government captures the fiscal
benefits from the current
non-oil growth driven by diversification of the
economy.
Non-oil revenue collected at the federal level (as percentage
of non-oil GDP) increases from 8.6% in 2008 to 9% in 2009.
Achieved: Non-oil revenue rose to 9.8 percent in 2009.
6 Enhancing transparency and
accountability for use
of public funds through effective
oversight arrangement
The accountability and transparency of MDA
are enhanced.
Month-end financial statements produced by 75 percent of
federal government MDAs
within 7 days. (Baseline: formerly no automated
statements).
Achieved late: Starting from zero, 67 percent of
MDAs were producing their
month end statements within 7 days by the end of the
implementation period and
78 percent were doing so by December 2010.
7 Enhancing
accountability, effectiveness and
value for money in
public procurement
The accountability and
effectiveness of public procurement are
enhanced.
65% of Federal Government contracts using national
standard bidding documents.
95% of Federal Government contract awards above NGN 75
million are published.
Achieved: As of June 2010 65 percent of Federal
Government contracts were
using NSBD and 100 percent of contract awards
above NGN 75 million were
published.
2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes
2.1 Program Performance (supported by a table derived from a policy matrix)
24. The tables below which are derived from the original program document policy
matrix summarize the prior actions (conditions) completed by government ahead of the
credit approval. The original table can be found on page 61 in Annex 2: Financial Sector
and Public Financial Management Policy Matrix.
10
Tranche # Amount Expected
Release Date
Actual Release
Date
Release
Tranche 1 USD 500
million
October 2009 January 6 2010 Regular
Tranche 1
List conditions from Legal Agreement/ Program Document Status The Program Document listed the following prior actions which had to be taken
before the board approval :
Pillar I: Maintaining confidence and stability in the financial system
A. Measures to stabilize the banking system:
1. CBN takes action to ensure the liquidity of the banking system by: (a)
providing a new extended window facility and expanding the range of
acceptable collateral for borrowing; (b) reducing the liquidity ratio
requirement from 40% to 25%; (c) reducing the reserve requirement
from 4% to 1%; and, (d) reducing the monetary policy rate from 9.75%
to 8%;
B. Strengthening the banking system
2. CBN adopts a timetable for: (a) banks to implement IFRS-based
regulatory reporting as of December 31, 2010; and (b) all banks to
implement a January 1 to December 31 financial year;
3. CBN adopts a program for introduction of consolidated risk-based
banking supervision; and
4. CBN places resident inspectors in all banks.
Pillar II: Sustaining growth through sound macroeconomic policies and
budget priorities.
A. Supporting macroeconomic stability and non-oil growth through sound
fiscal policies. The Recipient has:
5. Enacted [its 2009] budget using a conservative oil price of US$ 45 per
barrel;
6. Continued to implement a policy under which the Excess Crude
Account is credited with excess oil revenue (after compensating for
shortfalls in revenue);
B. Adjusting expenditure priorities to economic challenges
7. Enacted its 2009 budget containing recurrent spending to N1.6273
trillion (61.4 percent) and increasing capital spending to N1.0223
trillion (38.6 percent) of the its budget (excluding statutory transfers
and debt service);
8. Released capital expenditure of N187 billion to MDAs by January 31,
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
11
2009;
9. Adopted a framework for strategic interventions to address supply
constraints and unemployment in the context of the global economic
crisis;
C. Raising non oil revenue
There were no agreed prior actions for this policy area.
D. Enhancing transparency and accountability for use of public funds through
effective oversight arrangements.
10. Implemented the interim Accounting Transaction Recording and
Reporting System;
11. Adopted the Cash Management Policy;
E. Enhancing Accountability, Effectiveness and value for money in Public
Procurement.
12. Enacted and made operational the Public Procurement Act and
implementation regulations consistent with international best practices,
and made the regulations available to the public; and
13. Published on a bi-monthly basis public procurement contract awards in
the National Procurement Journal and on the BPP website.
Section D of the legal agreement stipulates that the recipient shall also conduct
an independent audit :
The Recipient shall:
1. Have the account and the recording of the amounts of the Financing
into the Recipient’s budget management system [referred to in Part C of
this Section] audited by independent auditors acceptable to the
Association, in accordance with consistently applied auditing standards
acceptable to the Association;
2. Furnish to the Association as soon as available, but in any case not later
than four months after the date of the Association’s request for such
audit, a certified copy of the report of such audit, of such scope and in
such detail as the Association shall reasonably request; and
3. Furnish to the Association such other information concerning the said
account and recording of the amounts of the Financing into the budget
management system, and their audit, as the Association shall
reasonably request.
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
Completed
12
2.2 Major Factors Affecting Implementation:
25. Two major factors impacted the implementation of the DPC:
Banking sector crisis management and
The changing political context.
Banking sector crisis management
26. Signs of looming imbalances in the banking sector had been identified by the
Bank team as early as February 2008 and discussed in confidence with the authorities and
later with the Bank’s Board. However, the exact vulnerability of the banking system was
unknown at the time of credit approval as the management of CBN prior to June 2009 did
not wish to engage in special inspections recommended by the Bank team since 2008. In
the absence of a firm idea of the size of the problems in the banking sector, the agenda
supported by the credit focused at the time of approval on a medium-term reform agenda
so as to further enhance transparency of the banking system and create better systems and
foundations for supervision over time, keeping in mind the possibility that a banking
crisis might emerge. The appointment of a new governor in June 2009 with an activist
stance and clear mandate for reform then allowed an implementation of aggressive short-
term measures to identify looming problems and tackle any potential crisis before it could
set in.
27. Shortly after Governor Sanusi was appointed he led the CBN in a program of
special inspections of Nigerian banks in July and August 2009, effectively following the
Bank’s recommendation made a year earlier. The first phase of the inspections program
identified five banks with severe capital deficiencies and liquidity problems. A second
round of audits identified a further four banks that also had solvency problems. The
special inspections confirmed that all nine had misrepresented their financial situation in
reports to the CBN by concealing and systematically under-provisioning large volumes of
nonperforming and classified loans.
28. Based on the findings of the special inspections, the CBN intervened in the
distressed banks by: (i) removing the executive directors and the managing director of
each bank and replacing them with individuals selected by the CBN; and, (ii) injecting
financial support in the form of subordinated debt in the order of US$4 billion
(approximately 2 percent of GDP). The speed and efficacy of these measures averted a
run on the banks and successfully bolstered confidence in the banking system.
29. The emerging findings of the special inspection program did not divert the
attention from the longer-term reform agenda. However, they added short-term
responsibilities to the CBN in addition to the longer-term objectives and indicators
targeted in the credit. Without the determined, and successful, resolution of the short-
term measures, in dialogue with the Bank’s team, the longer-term objectives of the Credit
would have been in jeopardy. The findings of the special inspections changed the context
13
of the dialogue and supervision by the Bank’s financial sector team. However, the team
continued to support the medium-term initiatives to strengthen accounting, supervision
and reporting as these were vital to prevent a future repeat of the crisis.
The changing political context
30. Shortly after the DPC was approved, President Yar’adua’s health began to
weaken culminating in his being hospitalized while on a pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia in
November 2009. A dangerous political vacuum emerged that was not filled for several
months until Vice-President Jonathan took over as acting President and was subsequently
sworn in after the President’s death on May 5th
2010. The period between August 2009
and May 2010 thus marked an intense hiatus in Nigerian politics. In addition, the need for
President Jonathan to consolidate power and his subsequent decision to run for a full-
term of office also changed the political dynamics and weakened the resolve to maintain
substantial fiscal buffers. The changing political context had two consequences:
The ratification of the DPC by the national assembly became politicized and was
subject to major delay. This was the first policy-based operation in almost thirty
years, and many Nigerians remembered the austerity measures that accompanied
the structural adjustment programs in the 1970s. Many were also skeptical of
government borrowing abroad for budgetary expenditure, fearing that the
resources would have limited development results. These sentiments resulted in
the need for a lengthy process of consensus building with the members of the
national assembly following credit approval.
The resolve to limit withdrawals from the ECA to times of crisis and maintain a
conservative budget position during a period of higher oil prices weakened.
During 2010, as part of President Jonathan’s power consolidation and in the
context of continuing high federal expenditure, the remaining balance of the ECA
was distributed to states and the ECA was depleted by end-2010. These
developments are already being reversed with more than US$ 5 billion
accumulated in the ECA and a conservative oil price budgeted for 2011. In
addition, the government has established a new Sovereign Wealth Fund that
would be more strongly protected from ad hoc withdrawals through a stronger
legal foundation.
2.3 Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) Design, Implementation and Utilization:
31. The FMOF was tasked with leading M & E on the public financial management
aspects of the credit such as the budget implementation and spending. M & E on the
major financial sector reforms supported by the DPC were overseen by the Central Bank
of Nigeria as the CBN is responsible for setting the parameters for liquidity, financial
reporting standards and supervisory practices such as risk-based supervision and
consolidated financial reporting. An assessment of this process is provided in section 3.
14
32. Design: Monitoring the DPC was made easier by the existence of the solid and
robust M&E framework and results matrix that accompanied the operation. The results
framework had been discussed broadly at both the political and technical levels of
government and was fully accepted by government. The matrix included specific and
quantifiable targets to which all stakeholders had committed (see above). The
macroeconomic targets included items fully within the control of the Federal Government
such as government expenditure, execution of the capital budget, the use of standard
bidding contracts and the production of financial statements. Measures to stabilize the
banking system focused on normalizing the functioning of the foreign exchange rate and
interbank money market, maintaining capital adequacy in the banks and improving
transparency in financial reporting.
33. Implementation: Monitoring the DPC program took the form of continuous
dialogue with Government counterparts to assess progress and address eventual
bottlenecks. Given the presence of task team members in the field, monitoring was done
on a relatively continuous basis. It was supported by complementary investment projects
such as the Economic Reform and Governance Project (ERGP) and ongoing technical
assistance to the financial sector. The Bank team monitored progress against the
baselines agreed during the preparation of the credit. (The results are reported in section
3.2). Collaboration with other donors also helped to underpin the policy dialogue and
build broader support for Government’s program.
34. Utilization: By its nature a DPC provides budget support to the ministry of
finance. Therefore the proceeds of the credit cannot be tracked. However, in requesting
the budgetary support, government indicated to the Bank that the additional resources
would be used to finance “shovel-ready” infrastructure projects. Government’s intention
was to boost consumption in a counter-cyclical manner, create temporary employment
and reduce the infrastructure deficit.
2.4 Expected Next Phase/Follow-up Operation (if any):
35. The Federal level DPC was a one-off budgetary support operation that was
provided to Nigeria within the context of the global financial crisis. It provided
government with support to maintain momentum on financial sector and public
management reforms. It also provided government with additional financing to protect
and supporting spending on infrastructure and vulnerable groups whose livelihoods
would have otherwise been jeopardized. A follow-on tranche was not expected.
36. At the time of the DPC preparation, Government expressed interest in a
complementary technical assistance operation to facilitate implementation of the broader
financial sector reform agenda that the DPC supported. Discussions quickly crystallized
into a potential technical assistance project that could support Nigeria’s reforms to
strengthen the key financial sector regulatory agencies through FSS2020. The Bank team
used its convening power to bring other donor agencies including DFID, GTZ, AfDB and
the IMF together around a common platform. The package of technical assistance that is
financed by grants and highly concessional credits would be attractive to government.
15
The Bank and other donor teams stand ready to provide such assistance through a project
vehicle.
37. The technical work on the financial sector has been summarized in the Bank’s
flagship publication “Achieving FSS2020: Making Finance Work for Nigeria”. The
follow-on dialogue on the non-oil growth pillar is embodied in the Bank’s recent
publication, “Putting Nigeria to Work” and the proposed Growth and Employment
Project (GEMS) which will be presented to the Bank’s Board on March 17, 2011.
38. The federal policy platform has also established new interest in developing state-
level DPOs so as to accelerate reform processes in Nigeria’s states. The acceptability of
policy dialogue with the federal government has raised the profile of the instrument, and
overcome some of the skepticism of the “structural adjustment” era. The first sub-
national DPO (for Lagos State) is slated for Board consideration on March 17, 2011.
3. Assessment of Outcomes
3.1 Relevance of Objectives, Design and Implementation
(to current country and global priorities, and Bank assistance strategy)
39. The reforms supported by the DPC were relevant to Nigeria’s development
challenges and closely linked to the country assistance strategy.
Relevance to current country and global priorities
40. Challenges to Nigerian development priorities: The DPC was designed to
mitigate the impact of the international financial crisis on Nigeria’s fiscal and financial
sectors. As described above, Nigeria's economy was affected by the global financial
crisis primarily through falling commodity prices, reduced net capital inflows (in
particular foreign direct investment (FDI) and remittances), and the drying up of trade
finance and international lines of credit. The fall in oil prices from a peak of $147/bbl in
July 2008 to around $40/bbl a year later presented macroeconomic challenges for Nigeria
as Federal Government revenues declined by 48 percent in a single year.
41. Although oil revenues were managed carefully and government built reserves in
the ECA during 2008, falling oil prices, production problems, and the deteriorating fiscal
outlook reduced international confidence and triggered a reduction in Nigeria's sovereign
credit rating outlook in 2009.
42. The large portfolio outflows beginning in early 2008 triggered a decline in the
stock market which further accelerated in the wake of the crisis. The smaller oil revenue
inflows, weakening confidence, and lower net capital inflows put increasing pressure on
the Naira. In combination, these factors led to liquidity pressures within the banking
system in late 2008 and the first months of 2009.
16
43. Concerns about the banking system started to be voiced with the slowdown in
growth and falling stock market prices. Unsustainable credit growth in 2007 and 2008
(see Figure 1) presented a challenge to the banks in managing their credit risks and to the
authorities in ensuring adequate reporting
and disclosure by the banks. Many observers
were concerned about the financial sector.
On May 18th
2008, in a review of Nigeria’s
banking system, JP Morgan noted, “Growth
has moved ahead of the risk capabilities of
both banks and the regulator”.
44. Addressing the causes of the problem
in the financial sector: The issues of
confidence and stability in Nigeria’s financial
system resulted from;
(i) Weak risk management controls
and poor supervision in
conjunction with rapid expansion
of the banks’ lending portfolios
following the introduction of the
new high level minimum capital
in July 2006.
(ii) Deteriorating asset quality due to
margin lending (lending to finance purchase of bank shares), a concentration
of lending in the downstream oil and gas sector (that became non-performing
following the fall in oil prices), and insider lending.
(iii) Poor accounting and disclosure practices, lack of consolidated reporting and
use of different financial year-end dates across the sector.
45. In response, the CBN introduced interest rate controls (requiring banks to cap
their interest rates on deposits) and restrictions on foreign exchange. Interest rate
controls were designed to prevent price competition for scarce deposits while foreign
exchange controls artificially propped up the Naira. Both measures would have been
extremely damaging to the real sector in the long term and their removal was supported
by DPC indicators.
46. Reform solutions for the financial sector contained in the DPC: As the data
reported by the banks to the CBN were unreliable (see box 1 above), it was not possible
to ascertain the true size of the problem in the commercial banking sector. As a result the
Bank team recommended a program of special inspections followed by measures
required to strengthen governance in the sector. As the authorities were fearful that
including the special program of inspections in the policy matrix might trigger a panic,
the Bank team decided to focus the DPC reform program on required, medium-term
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Growth in (nominal) credit to the private sector (y/y)
Nigeria
South
AfricaKenya
Figure 1: Growth in Credit 2006-2010
17
policy actions related to bank accounting, reporting and supervision whilst pursuing the
dialogue on the special inspections program in parallel and out of the lime light.
47. The operation brought a coherence and focus to this broader objective by
prioritizing a number of key strategic indicators (see below) that were vital to improving
the stability and strength of the banking system such as adopting international financial
reporting standards and moving towards consolidated risk-based supervision. It also
offered a platform for dialogue from which to persuade the authorities to remove
restrictions to access the foreign exchange market. The latter began to be phased out at
the time of the approval of the DPC, and then were completely phased out after its
approval.
48. Mitigating the macroeconomic impact of oil price decline: In terms of
macroeconomic stability and budget priorities, the DPC supported the government by
providing external financial resources and through concrete policy measures to improve
budgeting and public financial management. Despite the sharp decline in oil revenues,
government decided to maintain expenditures to boost counter-cyclical demand resulting
in a widening fiscal deficit that, if funded domestically, threatened to crowd out lending
to the private sector (see Figure 2).
49. Faced with this situation, the DPC focused on the most important aspects of
public financial management and budget execution, ensuring that Government raised
sufficient revenues (non oil
revenues were raised from 8.6%
of non-oil GDP to 9.8 percent),
limited recurrent spending but
increased execution of the capital
budget (from 53.9 percent in 2008
to 71.8 percent in 2009), and
advanced the reform agenda for
more transparent systems of
financial management and
procurement (all Federal
Government contracts above N75
million are published). In the
event, the fiscal stimulus,
combined with import substitution
brought on from a 20 percent
depreciation of the Naira,
maintained demand for domestic
goods and services at a level that
allowed Nigeria to avoid the sharp
growth declines or recessions that
hit a number of other oil-
dependent countries in 2009.
Government also released several
Figure 2: Fiscal expansion: real sector threat
1753.25
2169.63
2320.31
3228.031,669
2,343
2,625
3,557
258
544 490
883
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
2006 2007 2008 Prel. 2009
Domestic Debt Outstanding
Federal Government Expenditure
Non- oil revenue
Oil Revenue
18
tranches from the ECA throughout 2009 to support counter-cyclical spending and GDP
expanded by an estimated 7 percent during the year.
50. The DPC provided a strong platform of dialogue on macroeconomic policies in a
context in which the IMF dialogue was largely absent. The authorities regarded the DPC
as being a useful tool that would provide some discipline and support for macroeconomic
stability and reform policies that had become unpopular at the time of the global financial
crisis. The DPC provided a platform for dialogue to voice – with the necessary discretion
– concerns on key policies necessary to sustain macroeconomic sustainability while
promoting non-oil growth. The DPC offered financing necessary to sustain budget
implementation while lessening the impact of crowding out on domestic investment.
Relevance to the Bank’s Assistance Strategy
Table 2 : Country Assistance Strategy and DPC Objectives
The Bank’s Assistance Strategy DPC Objectives
(i) Improving governance;
(ii) Maintaining non-oil growth; and
(iii) Promoting human development.
(i) Maintaining confidence and stability
of the financial system;
(ii) Strengthening the banking system;
and
(iii) Supporting Government’s budget
objectives focused on raising
investment spending to accelerate
non-oil growth.
51. The Bank’s assistance strategy in Nigeria is contained in the Country Partnership
Strategy II which covers FY10-13. To achieve better governance, the CPS focuses on
how the Bank Group and partners can help the government strengthen its own systems
over the long term - going beyond fiduciary controls over donor funds, given that donors
provide a very small share of Nigeria’s public resources. (Nigeria received US$2.042
billion in aid in 2008 equivalent to 1.3 percent of GDP). Governance is both a core and a
cross-cutting theme of CPS II.
The DPC specifically supported the first two priorities of the CPS. It supported improved
governance in public financial management and strengthening the banking sector through
strengthened financial reporting and banking supervision. It supported non-oil growth by
promoting capital spending and helping avoid crowding out of the private sector by
excessive domestic borrowing.
52. The CPS explicitly seeks to provide support to the government to deal with the
impact of the global financial crisis (CPS II p2). Within the governance theme the CPS
highlighted the following areas (CPS p20) that are all highly relevant to the DPC: (i)
transparency and accountability in the use of resources; (ii) governance reforms in high
priority sectors to promote diversification and non-oil growth; and (iii) capacity
development in the public sector.
19
53. The CPS highlighted governance to promote more effective use of public
resources. It called for the following support in the key sectors supported by the DPC
(CPS Box 7 p22):
Federal level: In the area of public financial management, a Fiscal Responsibility
law and new procurement law were passed in 2007 at the federal level and
similar laws are being adopted in all states. The Accounting Transactional
Recording and Reporting System was rolled out, and a computerized federal
payroll management system was launched. Preparations for the adoption of the
Government Integrated Financial Management Information System are being
made and an E-payment system introduced in 2008 promises to increase
transparency and accountability further.
Financial Sector: A Banking sector review recommended that Nigeria adopt
International Financial Reporting Standards to improve accounting and auditing
standards. The Bank also recommended that Nigeria move to a consolidated
financial year end which would improve transparency and accountability and the
Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) announced in April 2009 that it would do so.
54. The two areas, Federal level public financial management and financial sector,
outlined in the CPS and reproduced above formed the heart of the DPC reform program.
55. In summary:
The key structural measures included in the Bank’s policy matrix both in regard
to the budget and public financial management objectives and the financial sector
were relevant to Nigeria’s needs, given the situation of fiscal crisis and the
banking sector weaknesses at the time the DPC was approved by the Board.
The DPC proposed solutions to focus on improved public financial management
and prudent macroeconomic policy as well as improving financial sector
accounting, supervision and reporting. All were relevant to Nigeria’s development
challenges.
The DPC was well aligned to the first two pillars of the CPS II focused on
improving governance and maintaining non-oil growth. It also supported the
strategy’s specific objective of providing support to Nigeria to weather the
international financial crisis.
The DPC policy matrix built very squarely on CPS II priorities for improved
public financial management at the Federal level including improved procurement,
automated reporting and better transparency and accountability. Similarly in the
financial sector the DPC supported a move to IFRS, a consolidated financial year-
end as well as improved transparency and accountability. All initiatives that were
already explicitly included in the CPS.
20
Most importantly the response to the Government’s request for DPC support
helped galvanize Government commitment to a number of key policies the
reversal of which would have posed major risks to Nigeria’s development path.
Continued exchange rate restrictions, a full blown banking crisis in the absence of
the intervention following the special inspection program, weakening
commitment to improved transparency, and lower growth as a consequence of
falling capital spending would have made for a powerful combined threat to the
CPS’s core objectives.
3.2 Achievement of Program Development Objectives
(including brief discussion of causal linkages between policy actions supported by operations and
outcomes)
56. The overall achievement of the DPC Program Development Objectives was
satisfactory.
57. Key outcomes of the supported program were captured in the original policy
matrix contained in Annex 2 of the program document and reproduced in Table 2 below.2
These outcomes were intended to measure progress against a longer-term reform agenda
in the areas of financial sector oversight and public financial management.
58. All the prior actions were met before Board presentation. All the targeted
outcomes have now been achieved, although the requirement to have month-end financial
statements produced by 75% of MDAs was not achieved by the end of the
implementation period (see below).
59. The section of achievements of the PDO follows the policy matrix. It presents: (i)
the policy area, (ii) the December 2009 outcome, (iii) the target indicator and (iv)
whether it was achieved. Each table is followed by a broader discussion that explains
how these achievements were secured, the context around them and provides additional,
supporting information on indicators that were not selected as DPC outcomes but are
nonetheless important in judging progress towards the stated DPC objectives.
2 For ease of reference, the entire Policy Matrix has been reproduced (unedited).
21
Table 2 : Financial Sector and Public Financial Management Policy Matrix
Policy area Prior Actions taken before Board
Approval
Outcomes Indicative Medium-Term Follow On
2008/09 December 2009 2009/10
PILLAR I: MAINTAINING CONFIDENCE AND STABILITY IN THE FINANCIAL SYSTEM
A. Measures to
stabilize the
banking system
CBN takes action to ensure the liquidity
of the banking system by: (a) providing
a new extended window facility and
expanding the range of acceptable
collateral for borrowing; (b) reducing
the liquidity ratio requirement from
40% to 25%; (c) reducing the reserve
requirement from 4% to 1%; and (d)
reducing the monetary policy rate from
9.75% to 8%.
DMO adopts a comprehensive three-year
action plan aimed at enhancing efficiency
and liquidity in government debt market.
NDIC makes available liquidity facilities
for banks with full regulatory compliance.
Banking system liquidity is restored
and increased confidence allows
normal functioning of the interbank
markets for Naira and foreign
exchange. Government debt markets
function more efficiently and become
more liquid.
(Use of the extended window facility
declines from NGN 480 billion/day to
below NGN 200 billion/day; parallel
market USD exchange rate falls to within
10% of the interbank rate).
Regulatory liquidity requirements adjusted
in line with stabilization of system
liquidity.
Interbank foreign exchange market reopens.
CBN temporary guidance on interest rates
withdrawn.
Consolidate debt portfolio management
strategies aiming at benchmark building
with the combined use of (i) re-opening
procedures; (ii) buybacks and exchanges;
(iii) earmarking benchmark issues for
PDMMs. Issue repos, securities lending and
short selling regulations.
Harmonize C&S platforms for T-Bills and
T-Bonds
B. Strengthening
the banking
system
CBN adopts a timetable for banks to
submit IFRS-based regulatory reports
as of December 31st, 2010.
CBN initiates the procurement process for
a consulting firm to provide support for
the IFRS transition.
CBN adopts a timetable for all banks to
implement a 1st January – 31
st
December financial year.
CBN adopts of a program for
introduction of consolidated risk-based
banking supervision.
CBN places resident inspectors in all banks.
CBN implements the electronic financial
The banking system becomes more
sound and transparent. (Capital
adequacy ratios remain above 15 percent
through 2009. Improved reporting and
accounting encourages investment in
bank debt & equity, and better pricing for
debt issuances by banks on international
markets. Banks’ ability to manage risk
improved by access new sources of credit
information).
Analysis conducted to assess the impact of
IFRS transition on the banking system.
NASB issues IFRS-compliant SAS for
banks.
IFRS training and transition assistance
program implemented.
Amend banking regulations, reporting
requirements, and supervisory procedures
to conform to International Financial
Reporting Standards
CBN adopts a framework for risk-based
supervision.
Issue tender for development of a
computerized movable collateral registry.
22
Policy area Prior Actions taken before Board
Approval
Outcomes Indicative Medium-Term Follow On
2008/09 December 2009 2009/10
analysis and surveillance system (eFASS)
program to improve statutory compliance
and anti-money laundering programs.
CBN regulations on private credit registries
implemented.
First licenses for private credit registries
issued.
PILLAR II: SUSTAINING GROWTH THROUGH SOUND MACROECONOMIC POLICIES AND BUDGET PRIORITIES
A. Supporting
macroeconomic
stability and
non-oil growth
through sound
fiscal policies
Enact a budget using a conservative oil
price of US$ 45 per barrel
Continue to implement a policy under
which the Excess Crude Account is
credited with excess oil revenue after
compensating for shortfalls in revenue
Compose the Fiscal Responsibility
Commission to monitor and ensure the
provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility
Act, 2007
Federal government expenditure in
2009 remain within a range of 23-25
percent of non-oil GDP (21.2 in 2008,
25.4 in 2007, 21.4 in 2006)
The government maintains the oil-price
based fiscal rule
Fiscal Responsibility Commission issue
report to the National Assembly including
all cases of contravention investigated
during the year
B. Adjusting
expenditure
priorities to
economic
challenges
Enact its 2009 budget containing
recurrent spending to N1.6273 trillion
(61.4 percent) and increasing capital
spending to N1.0223 trillion (38.6
percent) of its budget (excluding
statutory transfer and debt service)3
Release capital expenditure of N187
billion to MDAs by January 2009.
Appoint a Presidential Steering Committee
on the Global Economic Crisis to manage
Execution rate of the federal capital
budget (in percent of the 2009 budget)
rises from [53.6] percent in 2008 to
more than [60] percent in 2009
The Government continues to implement
Medium Term Sector Strategies for key
sectors to form the basis for budgeting and
investment planning
3 In 2008 (after the budget was amended late in the year), figures were 62.8 for recurrent spending and 37.2 for capital spending. Because of the late enactment
of additional capital spending in a supplement in November, execution rates of the additional allocations were generally low.
23
Policy area Prior Actions taken before Board
Approval
Outcomes Indicative Medium-Term Follow On
2008/09 December 2009 2009/10
the government’s crisis response
[Approve strategic interventions to
address supply constraints and
unemployment in the context of the
global economic meltdown]
C. Raising non-
oil revenue Initiate audit of processes in revenue
collecting agencies
Create customs reform committee
Non-oil revenue collected at the federal level 4 (as percentage of non-oil GDP) increases
from 8.6% in 2008 to 9% in 2009
Complete audits of revenue collecting agencies
and begin implementation of
recommendations.
D. Enhancing
transparency
and
accountability
for use of public
funds through
effective
oversight
arrangements
Implement interim Accounting
Transaction Recording and Reporting
System (ATRRS)
Adopt Cash Management Policy
Month-end financial statements
produced by 75 percent of federal
government MDA’s within 7 days.
(Baseline: formerly no automated
statements)
Implement the Government Integrated
Financial Management Information System
(GIFMIS) in the Office of the Accountant
General and Budget Office of the
Federation
Publish in-year budget outturn reports
within 30 days of end of each quarter (FRA
50)
Performance/Value for Money (VFM) audit
conducted for key priority MDAs
Minister of Finance to publish within 30
days of enactment of the Appropriation Act
a disbursement schedule in line with
Annual Cash Plan prepared by the
Accountant General (FRA 25-27)
E. Enhancing
Accountability,
Effectiveness
and value for
money in Public
Public Procurement Act and
Implementation Regulations consistent with
international best practices, operational and
made available to the public
Contract awards published in National
65% of Federal Government contracts
using national standard bidding
documents.
95% of Federal Government contract
awards above N 75 million are
Continue ensuring that Public
Procurement Act and Implementation
Regulations are fully implemented and
applied by MDAs.
4 This includes import and excises duties, companies’ income tax, value added tax, federal government independent revenue. The total non-oil revenue collected
at federal level was about N1.3trillion in 2008 (IMF estimates).
24
Policy area Prior Actions taken before Board
Approval
Outcomes Indicative Medium-Term Follow On
2008/09 December 2009 2009/10
Procurement Procurement Journal (bi-monthly) and BPP
website. published.
25
Pillar I Maintaining confidence and stability in the financial system
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) A. Measures to
stabilize the
banking
system
Banking system liquidity is
restored and increased
confidence allows normal
functioning of the interbank
markets for Naira and foreign
exchange. Government debt
markets function more
efficiently and become more
liquid.
Use of the extended
window facility declines
from N480 bn/day to
below N200 bn / day;
parallel market USD
exchange rate falls
within 10 percent of the
interbank rate.
The extended discount
window has been
closed.
Exchange rate controls
have been removed and
the parallel market has
disappeared.
60. The DPC measures to stabilize the banking system contributed to
maintaining confidence in and the stability of the financial system. Prior to the crisis,
the CBN provided banks with liquidity
support through the extended discount
window5
. Due to the turbulence in the
banking sector and the perceived risk of
lending to other banks, interbank rates spiked
in 2009 (see Figure 3). Once the special audit
program revealed that banks had serious
liquidity problems, the CBN guaranteed all
bank deposits on the inter-bank market. The
CBN also stepped in to provide direct
liquidity to the banking system in the form of
convertible loans to the nine troubled banks.
Once the liquidity had been fully restored,
the CBN closed the extended window facility.
These measures paved the way for
normalization of the interbank market (see
Figure 3).
61. Similarly in early 2009, the CBN
restricted bank’s access to foreign exchange
and a sizeable spread between the official
and parallel market rates emerged peaking at
about 25 percent in mid 2009. When CBN removed the temporary restrictions on the
foreign exchange market and reintroduced the Wholesale Dutch Auction System in July
2009 the parallel market exchange rate fell quickly to within 2% of the interbank rate and
then disappeared completely.
5 A discount window is the process by which a central bank provides credit to financial institutions. The
window helps reduce liquidity problems for banks and helps maintain the stability of financial markets.
Figure 3
0
5
10
15
20
25
2007 2008 2009 2010
26
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) B. Strengthening
the banking
system
The banking system becomes
more sound and transparent.
Improved reporting and
accounting encourages
investment in bank debt &
equity, and better pricing for
debt issuances by banks on
international markets. Banks’
ability to manage risk improved
by access new sources of credit
information
Capital adequacy ratios
remain above 15
percent through 2009.
Capital Adequacy Ratio
was 16.8 at end 2009.
62. The banking system becomes more sound and transparent. Among the key
outcome indicators was that the capital adequacy ratio would remain above 15 percent
and that improved reporting and accounting would encourage investment in bank debt
and equity, allowing better pricing for debt issuances by banks on the international
markets. Table 3 below indicates that by end 2009 the CAR remained above 15 percent
as targeted.
Table 3: Capital Adequacy
Year Regulatory Total
Capital Ratio
Regulatory Tier 1
Ratio
Total Equity / Total
Assets
2005 28.34 27.61 18.15
2006 26.50 25.50 16.24
2007 23.71 22.44 13.44
2008 28.32 27.25 19.23
2009 23.64 23.46 16.80 Source: Fitch Ratings 2010.
63. Following the intervention by the CBN, the Nigerian banking sector is now
bifurcated. The CBN focused emergency stabilization efforts on the intervened banks
which are no longer formally part of the operative banking system. The CBN is
reportedly actively looking for new investors for the intervened banks and encouraging
the better placed Nigerian banks to take-over their troubled counterparts. The remainder
of the banks are making progress in improving risk management, accounting and
disclosure as well as cleaning up their loan portfolios.
64. The banking sector was further strengthened by a number of CBN led
reforms highlighted in the policy matrix. Following the approval of the DPC, the CBN
started on a program of reform measures designed to make the banking system more
sound and transparent including:
Adopting a timetable to move to IFRS: This was important due to the weaknesses
inherent in Nigerian Accounting Standards. The decision to adopt IFRS took
place following intense debate about whether to adopt or adapt IFRS. Some
stakeholders pushed for a version of IFRS adapted to the Nigerian situation and
initially this view gained traction. However, a workshop convened by the Bank
27
and chaired by the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board resulted in a decision to
adopt IFRS by 2012. When fully implemented the introduction of IFRS is likely
to provide a considerable boost to confidence – especially among foreign
investors – as to the seriousness of the Nigerian reform process. The move to
IFRS was given further impetus on July 28th
2010 when the Federal Executive
Council approved January 1, 2012 as the effective date for convergence of
Nigerian accounting standards with IFRS. The Council directed the Nigerian
Accounting Standards Board (NASB), under the supervision of the Federal
Ministry of Commerce and Industry to take further necessary actions to
implement the Council’s decision. A program of training on IFRS has been
developed under the auspices of FSS2020 involving the NASB, CBN, SEC and
other relevant entities.
Strengthening consolidated risk-based banking supervision: As of end 2010, the
CBN introduced a single year end for all financial institutions. This effectively
ended the practice of cross transfers between wholly-owned subsidiaries to
artificially bolster balance sheets. The CBN has also mandated consolidated
supervision by end of 2011 to end the practice of off-balance sheet financing for
questionable transactions.
65. Following the CBN program of special inspections, it became apparent that much
of the margin lending was financed through wholly-owned brokerages and finance
houses and included in the “other” category of banks portfolios. As Figure 4 below
indicates, the CBN’s policy intervention is starting to have an impact in terms of
redirecting bank credit from margin loans to the real sector.
Figure 4: Squeezing margin loans out of the system
-15% -10% -5% 0% 5%
Solid Minerals
Finance & Insurance
Transport & Communications
Real Estate & Construction
Public Utilities
Agriculture
Government
Exports
Others
Manufacturing
Commerce
Source: CBN 2010
28
66. The IMF reports that “Substantial progress is being made in strengthening
banking supervision. The on-site examinations are under way for all non-intervened
banks. Lax enforcement was one of the key factors in the banking crisis, so it will be
important to rigorously follow up with any corrective measures that may be necessary.
The CBN has already started implementation of risk-based supervision on a pilot basis,
and full implementation will enhance the CBN’s capacity for early-detection of stress.”6
The Nigerian authorities also established an Asset Management Company to remove
toxic assets from the bank’s balance sheets (see Box 2).
Pillar II Sustaining growth through sound macroeconomic policies and budget
priorities
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) A. Supporting
macro-
economic
stability and
non-oil
growth
through sound
fiscal policies
Federal government
expenditure remains within set
range
Federal Government
expenditure in 2009
remains within a range
of 23-25 percent of
non-oil GDP.
19.8% from budget +
4.3% from ECA =
24.1 percent.
6 IMF Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV consultations. (Washington, D.C. February 2011.)
Box 2: AMCON: Asset Management Company of Nigeria
Nigeria has established AMCON to remove toxic assets from the banking system and
recapitalize the insolvent banks. Although the need for an AMC was not foreseen at the
time of DPC preparation, it was clear by the end of 2009 that such a vehicle could play a
useful role in removing toxic assets from the system. The CBN moved very quickly to
create AMCON. The AMCON Act was signed on July 26th
, 2010. Through this process
the CBN seeks to provide capital assistance to banks so as: (a) to stabilize the banking
system by recapitalizing and changing the governance of distressed institutions; (b) to
improve the governance of the sector by securing the recapitalization of distressed banks
by reputable strategic investors; and, (c) to provide some compensation to small
investors who had purchased the distressed bank shares at inflated prices. The bank
restructuring process being led by the CBN and AMCON is still under way (the first
asset purchases were completed in January 2011) and is expected to contribute to
significant progress in achieving these objectives.
29
67. Despite lower oil revenues in 2009, the federal government preserved
expenditure at a level to support critical investments and raised non-oil revenue. In
the aftermath of the crisis, the Nigerian government managed to maintain budgeted
expenditures at 19.8 per cent of non-oil GDP. This was less than the range of 23-25
percent that was targeted in the policy matrix. However, additional expenditures were
made from the excess crude account that when added to the budget expenditure put
spending in the middle of the targeted range.
68. Releases from the excess crude account (ECA) helped support infrastructure
and counter-cyclical spending. In January 2009 the ECA had a balance of $19 billion.
In February the Federation Account Allocation Committee recommended the sharing of
$2 billion with the states. In April, the National Economic Council (NEC) approved $5.3
billion to fund the President’s power intervention. Between June and August 2009,
another $3 billion was shared with state governments. Towards the end of 2009, Federal
Government injected $2 billion into the economy as an economic stimulus. The US$12.3
billion released from the ECA amounts to an additional 4.3 percent of non-oil GDP.
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) B. Adjusting
expenditure
priorities to
economic
challenges
Execution rate of the Federal
capital budget rises.
Above 60 percent 72 percent
69. Nigeria’s capital budget has traditionally been under-spent. This is a contributing
factor to the lack of public infrastructure and poor maintenance of public facilities. It
also leads for calls to extend the budget year (which follows the calendar year) into
March or April of the following year which in turn makes planning, budgeting and annual
comparisons difficult to follow.
70. In 2009, government took key steps to improve the execution rate of the capital
budget including enacting a budget that curtailed recurrent expenditure to N1.6 trillion
(61.4 percent) and increased capital spending to N1.0 trillion (38.6 percent of the budget).
In addition the FMOF released N187 billion to the executing agencies in January 2009.
In comparison, FMOF releases through end January 2008 had been zero.
71. The implementation of these strategies contributed to improved budgeting and
investment planning and the execution rate of the federal capital budget (in percent of
final approved capital budget) increased from 53.9 per cent in 2008 to 71.8 per cent in
2009, easily exceeding the minimum 60 percent rate targeted by the operation.
30
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) C. Raising non-
oil revenue7
Non-oil revenue collected at the
Federal level (as percentage of
non-oil GDP) increases.
An increase from 8.6%
in 2008 to 9% in 2009
9.8 percent
72. Non-oil revenue includes import and excise duties, corporate tax, value added tax
and Federal Government independent revenue. By implementing various tax
administration reform measures, the government increased non-oil revenue collection in
percent of non-oil GDP from 8.6 per cent in 2008 to 9.8 percent in 2009 (as against a
target of 9 percent).
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes /Late) D. Enhancing
transparency
and
accountability
for use of
public funds
through
effective
oversight
arrangements
Month end financial statements
produced by Federal
Government MDAs within 7
days. (Baseline: formerly no
automated statements).
75 percent 67% June 2010
77% December 2010
Achieved now but not
achieved during
implementation
73. Nigeria also made good progresses in the area of accountability and
effectiveness of the use of public funds. The continuous effort to automate the treasury
function yielded good results as there was an increase in the percentage of federal MDAs
producing their month-end financial statements (with ATRRS) within 7 days from 50%
in 2009 to 67% as at June 2010. The original target of 75 percent was met later in 2010.
This is the only indicator that was not met within the implementation period of the
project (i.e. up to June 30th
2010).
Policy Area Outcome Target Achieved (Yes) E. Enhancing
Accountability,
Effectiveness
and value for
money in Public
Procurement
Federal Government
contracts use national
standard bidding documents
and contract awards
published.
65 % of FG contracts
using national standard
bidding documents
95% FG contract
awards above N75
million are published.
65%
100%
74. As of June 2010, over 65 per cent of government contracts were completed using
national standard bidding documents and all Federal Government contract awards above
N 75 million were published (original target 95 percent).
7 Note: There was no prior action attached to this outcome. It is reported on for comprehensiveness.
31
75. The Budget Office contributes to enhance the transparency of the budget
implementation by publishing quarterly budget outturn reports on its website. These
reports describe the extent to which the revenue and expenditure targets in the budget
were met during each quarter. In the procurement area, progress has been made by the
Bureau of Public Procurement (BPP) which continues to ensure that MDAs operate
within the requirements of the Public Procurement Act.
76. The Federal Government also sought to implement the Government Integrated
Financial Management Information System (GIFMIS) in the Office of the Accountant-
General and Budget Office of the Federation and has made good progress in this regard: a
GIFMIS project manager has been appointed and the procurement of GIFMIS software
and hardware has reached advanced stages. 8
3.4 Justification of Overall Outcome Rating
(combining relevance, achievement of PDOs)
Rating: Satisfactory.
77. Given the national development challenges that Nigeria was facing at the time
that the DPC was processed, the design objectives and indicators were highly relevant
(see above). The operation targeted nine strategic indicators to act as proxies for a
broader program of improved macroeconomic management and a more stable and
resilient financial sector. All nine indicators were met or surpassed although one was not
met within the project implementation period. The Nigerian authorities took quick steps
to resolve uncertainties on the interbank market and effectively ended the parallel
exchange rate regime. Intervening in the distressed banks also engendered greater
confidence among the general public and successfully avoided a run on the banks. The
healthy banks continue to make progress on the reform agenda supported by the DPC
while CBN has tailored emergency support to banks in distress.
78. With the adoption of the oil-price based fiscal rule and conservative oil reference
prices, the Federal government managed to maintain expenditure at a level commensurate
with macroeconomic and fiscal sustainability, thus avoiding the previous boom-and–bust
cycle. Government has also consistently signaled its intentions in this area with
conservative estimates of the future oil price upon which the budgets are constructed. The
DPC cemented this progress as government enacted the 2009 budget using a reference oil
price of $45 per barrel (the actual average price in 2009 proved to be US$54 per barrel).
The government released $12.3 billion from the ECA in 2009 which was consistent with
a policy of counter-cyclical spending in a downturn.
79. Finally government has also made serious progress in increasing the transparency
of the public financial management process. Starting from a situation in which no
automated month-end financial statements were produced, 67 percent of Government
8 As of December 2010, the Bank team commented on the Bid Evaluation Report (BER) and the Office of the
Accountant General of the Federation (OAGF) is now completing its due diligence of the proposed contractor.
32
MDAs were producing statements using ATRRS by the end of the implementation
period. The original target of 75 percent was met later in 2010 and presents a tremendous
improvement and a willingness to embrace new working practices. Government is now
pushing ahead with GIFMIS, value for money audits and additional transparency
measures. The DPC supported these efforts, focused government’s attention and helped
to highlight these outcomes to a sometimes skeptical international community.
80. It is too early to tell whether these largely technocratic and technology related
reforms will actually be translated into improved accounting, budgeting and procurement.
However, it is clear that without these measures the task of increasing transparency,
accountability and evaluation of government processes would have been very difficult.
The ERGP task team continues to provide support to FGN on these issues going forward.
3.5 Overarching Themes, Other Outcomes and Impacts
(if any, where not previously covered or to amplify discussion above) (a) Poverty Impacts, Gender Aspects, and Social Development
81. The poverty impacts of reform of the financial and macroeconomic sectors cannot
be understated. The Nigerian oil sector accounts for about 20 percent of GDP, 85 percent
of consolidated government revenue and 95 percent of foreign exchange earnings.
Within this context, the management and distribution of oil revenues and ultimately
diversification from oil will have a tremendous impact on development outcomes. Donor
resources account for less than 2 percent of government’s total budget and therefore
ensuring that Nigeria’s own resources are prudently and transparently managed is critical
to poverty reduction.
82. However the sheer scale of the banking sector also illustrates why banking sector
reform is crucial to development outcomes. Banks account for 91 percent of the Nigerian
financial sector (see Figure 5) and
successfully resolving these issues would
have significant poverty impacts by
reducing the contingent liabilities to the
state as well as being able to provide
increased credit to the private sector which
would help fund employment creation
through business expansion.
83. The CBN moved quickly to
implement a series of reform measures that
had been recommended by the Bank team
throughout 2008 and early 2009. They
implemented the measures included in the
DPC policy matrix and even went beyond
them in certain areas. The latest initiative in
the banking sector resolution is the creation
of AMCON which is expected to remove
toxic assets from the banks’ balance sheets allowing them to restart lending. (see Box 2).
Domestic banks
87%
Pensions
4%
Mortgage companies
2%
Foreign banks
4%
Insurance
1%
Other non bank
2%
Figure 5: Structure of Nigerian
Financial Sector
33
84. On December 3rd 2010 AMCON announced that it would issue a series of
government guaranteed bond issues worth a total of N2.34 trillion (US$16.8 billion). To
put this in perspective Nigeria’s total outstanding domestic debt in 2010 (the vast
majority of government’s debt is domestically held) is N4.56 trillion ($28 billion as of
September 2010) or 14 percent of GDP. It is clear that issuing such a huge amount of
extra debt is likely to further crowd out the private sector and could have a serious impact
on domestic interest rates and growth. The authorities’ rapid and focused response to the
banking sector issues has served to contain the impact of the crisis. Nonetheless, these
numbers indicate the importance and potential development impact that addressing
structural reforms can have on financial sector stability and national development
outcomes. Once implemented, the medium-term structural reforms relating to bank
reporting and supervision supported by the DPC will considerably reduce the likelihood
of the recurrence of similar malpractice in the banking system.
(b) Institutional Change/Strengthening
(particularly with reference to impacts on longer-term capacity and institutional development)
85. In addition to the large number of institutional improvements highlighted above
(section 3.3) there were also other issues that were included in the policy matrix as
indicative measures for the medium and longer term. Many of these have also been
implemented including the following:
The CBN has adopted a framework for risk-based supervision. This transition has
now started with banks submitting their risk management frameworks to the CBN
and the CBN undertaking training for all its bank supervisors.
The CBN established a risk management department in March 2010 and has
proceeded to develop capital adequacy and enterprise risk assessment process
guidelines, based on ICAAP (UK) and COSOS (US) frameworks for the financial
industry.
A pilot risk-based examination of banks was conducted and completed in the first
quarter 2010. Implementation of risk-based supervision on a consolidated basis
for all banks started in 2011.
CBN has also issued a tender for the development of a computerized movable
collateral registry. CBN has also issued the first three licenses to private credit
registries that are now fully operational.
New prudential guidelines were issued in May 2010. The guidelines are aimed at
promoting a sound system and account for evolving practices in the financial
system. The guidelines serve as minimum requirements and banks are
encouraged to adopt more stringent measures. The key revisions and additions
were (i) revised loan provisioning, limits on credit risk and credit disclosure
practices, and (ii) rules to entrench corporate governance in the banking system
with maximum tenures of executive and non-executive officers stipulated.
34
The financial stability committee (FSC) has been strengthened and closer
collaboration between the FSC and monetary policy committee (MPC) has been
mandated. The FSC will focus on maintaining systemic stability and signs of
distress while analyzing credit and financial asset movements.
86. The Nigerian authorities are also focused on a number of future institutional
strengthening initiatives that have been designed and will be implemented in the near
term including;
Harmonizing the supervision process to ensure a comprehensive financial system
regulatory framework. Introducing a multi-regulator task force to integrate
process reforms across the regulators.
Establishing a consumer protection department to restore consumer confidence in
the industry. The authorities foresee the development of the department into a
fully fledged Financial Ombudsman Service within a 3-5 year period.
The CBN will prohibit banks from using depositors’ funds for private equity or
venture capital investment through some version of the Volcker rule or Glass-
Stegal.
87. Notably, as targeted by the DPC, the government continued to implement the oil-
price based fiscal rule for the 2011 budget. A Fiscal Responsibility Commission
mandated by the Fiscal Responsibility Law of 2007, was inaugurated by the Presidency
in September 2009. The Commission has the mandate to ensure prudent management of
the nation’s resources as well as the mandate to secure greater accountability and
transparency in fiscal operations within the Medium Term Fiscal Policy Framework.
88. The execution rate of the capital budget reached 75 percent for the 2009 budget
(inclusive of the extension of the 2009 budget through the first quarter 2010). Medium-
Term Sector Strategies for key sectors have been further refined in 2010 and have been
used as a basis for prioritization of budget allocations. Procurement reforms also
proceeded according to written agreements with standard bidding documents increasingly
being used and contract awards published.
(c) Other Unintended Outcomes and Impacts (positive or negative, if any)
89. The DPC provided Nigeria with US$500 million in budgetary support at a time
when the international capital markets were inaccessible. The Bank’s ability to move
quickly and decisively greatly enhanced the Bank’s image and standing with the Nigerian
authorities. It successfully strengthened the Bank’s profile as a trusted partner in the
development process and brought a new found credibility, not just for policy advice but
also for budget support. The FMOF increasingly sought the Bank’s advice on a number
of financial sectors issues including the establishment of the asset management company,
the resolution of the credit squeeze, employment creation programs and credit guarantee
schemes.
35
90. This was the time that the Bank had offered budget support to the Nigerian
government in almost thirty years. Providing budgetary support at such a time also
effectively signaled the Bank’s confidence in Nigeria’s financial management which in
turn helped the country to secure a solid sovereign debt rating, an important step on the
road to middle income status.
91. The Bank’s budget support operation also provided other donors with the
confidence to prepare their own operations. In October 2009, the African Development
Bank approved US$157m in its first ever budget support operation for Nigeria.
3.6 Summary of Findings of Beneficiary Survey and/or Stakeholder Workshops
(optional for Core ICR, required for ILI, details in annexes)
92. A multi-stakeholder workshop was organized on November 23, 2010 at the World
Bank offices in Abuja. The stakeholder group included representatives from Federal
Ministry of Finance, Central Bank, Securities and Exchange Commission, Nigeria
Accounting Standards Board, National Pension Commission, Debt Management Office,
Office of the Account General of the Federation, and the Office of the Auditor General of
the Federation.
93. The discussion was divided into three parts: (i) Introduction and Context, (ii)
Macroeconomic Management Pillar, (iii) Financial Sector Stability and strengthening
Pillar.
The key findings were :
Some participants were unfamiliar with the budget support instrument and most
were generally skeptical of the Nigerian Government’s ability to effectively and
efficiently program their budgetary resources. Many of the participants preferred
World Bank investment and project finance over budgetary support.
Since by its nature budgetary support is fungible and untied it is impossible to
track such expenditure. Participants felt that this undermined the Government’s
and World Bank’s ability to monitor the impact of the expenditure.
Participants agreed that almost all of the outcome goals for the DPC were
achieved during the implementation period of the credit. They felt that the
government had moved well beyond the key indicators and in most areas had also
achieved many of the indicative follow-on topics. Therefore there was broad
consensus on the idea that Government was strongly committed to the reform
program. However, the participants still felt that since the finances from the
credit could not be tracked directly to support these policy changes, the results
could not be fully attributed to the credit.
36
4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome Rating: The overall risk is Substantial.
94. This overall rating is based on an assessment of the following sub-risks to the
project that the project document identified and which remain relevant:
95. Governance risk (Substantial): Nigeria is often characterized as a country that
faces governance challenges. It occupied the last position in Transparency International’s
(TI) global rankings in 2000. The years of military dictatorship served to cement this
image. However, during the last decade of civilian rule the country has made great
strides in improving governance. There is a strong consensus for private sector led
growth and the need for stable macroeconomic conditions. Many of the actions identified
in the policy matrix focused on strengthening the transparency and accountability of the
financial sector and public financial management in Nigeria. Nigeria has seen its TI
ranking rise gradually from 142 in 2005 to 134 in 2010.
96. In dealing with the banking crisis the central bank took a courageous stand against
powerful vested interests and the CBN governor was able to rely on the continued
support of two Presidents in this effort. Powerful commercial bank managers have been
removed from their posts and others have been imprisoned. These results have been
sustained in the face of significant political and legal challenges. This bodes well for the
future but at least for now the governance risks continues to be substantial.
97. Political Support (Substantial): The implementation of any economic reform will
require a measure of political capital. Taking tough decisions is never easy and doing so
within the context of a severe economic downturn and the run-up to an election will
present even greater challenges. However, the President and his economic team have
fully supported the financial sector reforms, supporting the expeditious passage of
legislation required to create and fund AMCON.
98. Political support for fiscal prudence waned in 2010 as government spending
continued to increase beyond the end of the crisis. However, having depleted the ECA
towards the end of 2010, a significant balance of US$5bn has now been accumulated.
Once the April 2011 elections are over, momentum should build for the continued
implementation of improved public financial management. The Governor of the CBN a
key leader of the reform program is expected to continue in his role for at least another
three years allowing him to provide considerable further impetus behind the post-crisis
structural reforms of the financial sector.
99. Economic Risks (Moderate): A large buffer of international reserves and low debt
helped mitigate the impact of the global crisis on Nigeria. Oil revenues rebounded faster
than expected as did oil production. Government boosted its spending during the down
turn and growth did not fall to the levels forecasted by the IMF for 2009. However, the
37
continued high level of spending in 2010 depleted the ECA and threatened fiscal stability.
Without a fiscal cushion Nigeria has become more vulnerable to exogenous shocks. 9
100. Going forward, the main economic risks stem from a possible collapse in the price
of oil. Although it is impossible to accurately forecast future oil prices it does seem that
the global financial crisis is over and that a gradual improvement in the global economy
will start to take hold from 2011 onwards. The oil price closed out 2010 at around
US$90 per barrel. The authorities have now moved to replace the excess crude account
with a sovereign wealth fund (which addresses the legal and institutional weaknesses of
the ECA) focused on providing resources for future generations. Nigeria’s domestic and
external borrowings are at still at manageable levels (16 percent total debt to GDP). The
exchange rate has stabilized following the removal of temporary restrictions and
Nigeria’s reserves are expected to start rising again following the elections (April 2011).
101. Monetary and exchange rate policy is focused on reducing inflation and
maintaining a stable exchange rate. The IMF has recently called for greater flexibility in
the exchange rate and lauded the recent increase in policy rates as a step in the right
direction.10
Nigeria’s US$500 million Eurobond offer, launched in January 2011 was
heavily oversubscribed – a single of international investor confidence. Therefore we
conclude that there are fewer economic risks to the sustainability of the reform program.
102. Financial Sector Risks (Moderate): To a large extent the biggest potential
financial sector risk at the time of DPC approval was the possibility of a full blown
banking sector crisis. The task team had difficulty ascertaining the risk exposure of the
banking system due to weak accounting and reporting. While a collapse of the banking
sector was averted due to swift action by the CBN, the crisis has now come to pass. Far
from derailing the reform program it is actually providing a “burning platform” that is
galvanizing support from the political classes as well as the general public. As the
banking sector crisis unfolded it underscored the need for improved financial sector
governance, banking supervision, accounting and oversight practices as well as a
mechanism for removing toxic assets from the banking system.
103. Security risks (High): Nigeria’s post-colonial history is marked by constant
resorts to violence by separatist and militant groups. There is always the risk of
deterioration in the security situation. During 2010 militant activities in the Niger Delta
have flared up on several occasions, opportunistic bombings and religiously inspired
violence have also taken their toll. So far the government remains committed to
resolving these issues and has not allowed the law and order situation to shift its focus
from the economic agenda.
9 IMF was forecasting 2.5% growth for 2009. The actual figure was 6.5% which was nonetheless a significant drop
from the near double digit rates enjoyed in 2007 and 2008.
10 IMF: Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV consultation, Washington D.C. February 2011
38
5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance (relating to design, implementation and outcome issues)
5.1 Bank Performance
(a) Bank Performance in Ensuring Quality at Entry (i.e., performance through lending phase)
Rating: Satisfactory
104. This operation was built on a large body of high quality diagnostic work on the
financial sector as well as an ongoing engagement on fiscal policy and public financial
management. The team worked quickly and diligently to prepare the project within four
months from request to Board approval taking advantage of the Bank’s fast track facility
to provide Nigeria with timely funds.
105. Prior to DPC preparation, the Bank team produced a number of diagnostic pieces
in the context of support to the Nigerian Financial System Strategy 2020 which drew
attention to the looming imbalances in the Nigerian financial system. A report on the
stock market dated January 2008 highlighted the Nigerian stock exchange as having the
fourth highest price-earnings ratio of any exchange in the world and being more than
double the emerging market average. The Bank’s concerns over overvalued asset prices
were presented to Government in February 2008 before the crash.
Figure 6: Nigeria’s Overvalued Stock Market 2008
106. The stock market collapse was a trigger for the banking system crisis, as margin
loans provided to bank customers went into default. Within this context, the team
recommended a number of reform priorities including;
39
“To monitor banks’ investment in equities both on their own balance sheets and
those of their subsidiaries” and
“To introduce consolidated banking supervision”.
107. Another report presented to the CBN later in 2008 addressed potential banking
sector reforms. 11
The report highlighted the “potential for major banking problems in the
future if the system is not subjected to effective prudential regulation and supervision in
the short term”. The report pinpointed the weaknesses in the banking sector stemming
from a concentrated and weakening asset base as well as a lack of transparency. In
addition to the diagnostic report, the Bank also recommended a program of technical
assistance to improve banking supervision and a program designed to move Nigerian
banks towards international financial reporting standards.12
This technical assistance
proposal called for a special inspections program very similar to the special audits
eventually conducted by the CBN about a year later in August to October, 2009.
108. On the IFRS agenda, the Bank team encountered resistance from the accounting
profession and other stakeholders. The Bank team convened and hosted a workshop on
these issues that was chaired by the Nigerian Accounting Standards Board (NASB) and
included participants from all the relevant financial sector regulatory bodies, including
the CBN and the FMOF. At the meeting the Bank invited accountants from PWC
Mozambique to present their experience of implementing IFRS. The agreements reached
at that meeting led to a consensus on the need to adopt IFRS.
109. In further discussions with the authorities the Bank team continued to highlight
deficiencies in bank accounting, reporting and disclosure and – in recognition of the
seriousness of the situation – the Bank continued to emphasize the importance of
undertaking a thorough “health-check” of the banking system according to international
best practices. The Bank team emphasized that this course of action would have multiple
benefits:
Providing the banking system with technical support from experts versed in best-
practice banking supervision;
Providing a comprehensive assessment of risk exposure in the Nigerian banking
sector;
Advising on how best to respond to the potential risks arising from the
international financial crisis; and
Strengthening the capacity of the banking supervisors in using IFRS and
supplying them with hands-on training in risk-based supervision.
11 Nigerian banking system: A summary diagnostic. World Bank December 2008.
12 Meeting the regulatory and supervisory challenges of a world class banking system, World Bank January 2009.
40
110. The Bank recommended this special program of audits plus capacity building as it
would allow the regulators to meet the challenges posed by the strong asset growth and
increasing complexity of the banking system. This approach had been used successfully
in a number of countries with rapidly evolving financial sectors and that the team offered
to share considerable accumulated knowledge and experience on the matter with the
Nigerian authorities.
111. The DPC could not track results for all the items of the reform program. Instead
it targeted a small number of the most relevant indicators to restore liquidity and stability
to the system. On the macroeconomic side, some of the selected indicators tracked
existing government priorities, such as those around budget execution. However, others
tracked more controversial topics, such as removing exchange rate controls and
improving the transparency of public procurement. The operation supported the dialogue
around these issues and as a result there is now broad consensus on them.
(b) Quality of Supervision (including M&E arrangements)
Rating: Satisfactory
112. The supervision (and design) performance represented a strong partnership
between the PREM and FPD teams. The operation also benefitted from a strong Abuja-
based supervisory presence along with an active day-to-day dialogue with the key
counterparts at the FMOF and CBN. The implementation status report was completed
thoroughly with all the required data on the key implementation indicators. The ISR
highlights the areas where the original targets were not being reached as well as
adjustments to the original baselines. For instance government expenditure figures were
recalculated during the project implementation. A supplemental budget was also
approved in 2009 thereby altering the capital execution rates.
(c) Justification of Rating for Overall Bank Performance
Rating: Satisfactory
113. The Nigeria DPC came at a time when government’s short term spending
priorities were jeopardized by the impact of the global financial crisis, the fall in the oil
price and pressure on the exchange rate. Despite years of solid macroeconomic
stewardship and the debt write-down, the situation threatened the country’s
macroeconomic balance.
114. The DPC addressed the major structural reform elements required to clean up the
financial sector and maintain sound macroeconomic policies and budgetary priorities.
Almost all of the priority outcome indicators were quickly achieved building on the prior
actions that were met before Board approval. The priority actions proved important to
maintain government focus on its reform program and the government continues to make
progress in all areas despite a hiatus caused by a change in Presidents and increasing
policy uncertainty in the run up to the upcoming election.
41
115. Finally the DPC was put together very quickly with only a matter of months
elapsing from the time that an official request was received in March to Board approval
in July 2009. The fact that the task team was able to move so rapidly demonstrates the
solid analytical basis that had been established in the areas of macroeconomic
management and on the financial sector in the years preceding the crisis as well as strong
support from the country management.
5.2 Borrower Performance
(a) Government Performance Rating: Satisfactory
116. A large part of the success of the program can be attributed to the Government’s
high level commitment to see it succeed. During the preparation process, the Federal
Minister of Finance personally led the process and garnered the support of other
stakeholders for a comprehensive set of key reform measures and their associated
indicators and prior actions. The Government also designated key counterparts for the
overall program providing a clear line of day-to-day communication with Bank staff.
This was important in the context of a fast tracked operation. This greatly facilitated
communication and monitoring of progress by the task team during supervision as well as
preparation. The lead Government counterparts in the CBN and FMOF and the
Minister’s advisers took the lead in identifying bottlenecks and following up with the
respective units to ensure that the prior actions were being met.
(b) Implementing Agency or Agencies Performance Rating: Highly Satisfactory
117. In addition to the role of the Federal Ministry of Finance, the CBN played a lead
role in implementing the financial sector reforms. Prior to the DPC program, the CBN
had been reluctant to accept the Bank’s advice as there were no overt signs of a crisis at
the time. While many observers realized there might be problems in the banking sector
none had guessed its size. The concerns of the authorities were, understandably, that any
moves towards assessing/auditing the banks so as to reveal their situation according to
international financial reporting standards might trigger just the kind of event that the
authorities were seeking to avoid. Understandably, these concerns impacted the design of
the actions which the Bank was able to include in the results matrix of the DPC.
118. Following the abatement of the international crisis and the appointment of a new
Governor at the Central Bank in June 2009 the CBN’s willingness to address the situation
of the banks changed dramatically. The new Governor has personally adopted and led
the reform agenda. The new Governor communicated the reform agenda in the domestic
and international media and expressed strong appreciation of the vocal support received
from both Bank staff and management. Government used its own resources to recruit the
necessary consultants, lawyers and financial advisers to implement the reform program.
The Bank’s support proved important to rally support in the donor community and
42
provide impartial analysis to the private sector, especially international rating agencies
and commercial banks interested in investing in the sector.
119. Responding to repeated recourse by certain banks to liquidity provided through a
special discount window, Governor Sanusi initially authorized special audits of 10 (of
24) Nigerian banks. Subsequently a second round of audits of the remaining banks was
undertaken. The results of these audits were announced in two batches in August and
October, 2009, and it transpired that 9 of the 24 banks had liquidity difficulties and 8 of
them suffered from capital shortfalls and possible insolvency. The immediate liquidity
requirements of the banks amounted to some NGN 600 billion (equivalent to $4 billion).
120. The ultimate size of the bank bail-out is still unclear, as the troubled banks still
remain under central bank stewardship. The authorities have also established an Asset
Management Corporation of Nigeria (AMCON) to resolve the situation of the troubled
banks. Concerted efforts to strengthen bank supervision supported by the IMF and the
Bank are also underway.
121. The measures to strengthen and stabilize the banking system first proposed by the
Bank and later adopted by the Nigerian authorities represent deep-seated structural
reforms to the accounting, reporting and disclosure practices of the banks, and to
institutional strengthening of the supervisory and resolution processes. In an
environment hitherto renowned for its corruption and weak governance these results
provide the basis for a turn-around not only in terms of bank solvency, but much more
importantly in the practices exercised by banking supervisors, in sanctioning bank
managers and their boards for malpractice, in encouraging banks to develop and deepen
the financial system rather than relying on earnings for short-term speculation, and in
setting up a robust resolution framework. The excellent performance of the CBN was
widely recognized and in January 2011, Governor Sanusi was named Central Bank
Governor of the Year by “The Banker” (a publication of the Financial Times of London).
(c) Justification of Rating for Overall Borrower Performance
Rating: Satisfactory
122. The satisfactory rating reflects a combination of the highly satisfactory
performance of the major implementing agency and a satisfactory performance from the
remainder of the Government. As a result of strong Government commitment the
program was delivered on a timely basis. There were no serious slippages despite a
broader context of tremendous uncertainties associated in a change of administration. In
most cases the Government has exceeded the minimum requirements agreed to in the
program document. Although the proceeds of the project took several months to
disburse, the reform program went ahead regardless (see section 2.2). During this period,
members from the executive branch negotiated with legislators to build consensus and
support for the operation, eventually passing resolutions to adopt the program. They also
liaised with the Federal Executive Council several times to secure the Government
approvals required to process the DPC. Later this ongoing liaison would result in the
quick passage of the AMCON Act that would allow the banking sector resolution to
make rapid progress.
43
6. Lessons Learned
(both operation-specific and of wide general application)
123. Ownership is key to success: Key to the DPL’s success is the fact that the
request for DPC support was initiated by the Government without any prodding by the
Bank. This was made easier by the fact that the Minister of Finance had prior experience
in both the World Bank and the Nigerian Debt Management Office. As a technical
specialist he could advise and guide other key stakeholders within Government on the
pros and cons of borrowing from IDA as opposed to borrowing from the international
capital markets and he understood the potential value of the DPC instrument both as a
benchmark for international support as well as a tool to galvanize the policy stance in
Government. The strong Government leadership and buy-in to the program at the time it
was being prepared was key to its success.
124. Strong analytical foundations are required for a successful operation: The
Bank’s high quality analytical work and numerous dissemination events helped to build
the Bank’s credibility in the financial sector, strengthen the relationship with the CBN
and provided a road map for reform of the banking sector and improvements in public
financial management. When the request for a DPC came the Bank was able to respond
extremely quickly because of its long standing engagement on the financial sector and
macro-economy. Allowing Bank teams more time to maintain a high quality sector
dialogue in key sectors over time will ensure that when the reform windows open the
Bank is well placed to support government priorities.
125. The importance of communicating the reform program: The DPC
components focused on financial sector reform could not have been implemented without
the reformist Governor of the CBN and the Federal Minister of Finance. These key
reform champions communicated their own reform program without much visible
support from the World Bank. During this period the Bank deliberately remained silent
on key reforms, and prepared and approved its budget support operation without fanfare.
Bank staff provided support to the CBN and FMOF initiatives when asked. Having all
the reform messages come from respected Nigerian leadership rather than from Bank
staff was vital for the success of the program in the complex Nigerian political economy
context.
126. Decentralization of a task team can lead to better collaboration: The DPC
focused on two sectors macroeconomics and financial sector led by PREM and FPD
respectively. There was close collaboration throughout between the teams both in Abuja
and Washington. Each team had a lead specialist based in the field. In addition, most of
the team members were also based in the field office and therefore were able to cultivate
close working relationships with government counterparts. This facilitated dialogue,
especially as the breadth and depth of the engagement grew. Having the task members
based in one place helped to develop a sense of teamwork and also allowed the team to
have day-to-day discussions with government counterparts.
44
7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners
(a) Borrower/Implementing agencies
127. Although the Federal Ministry of Finance was requested to officially comment on
the draft ICR it declined to do so. However, representatives of the FMOF attended the
stakeholder consultation session and their views are reflected above in section 3.6.
(b) Co-financiers N/A
(c) Other partners and stakeholders (e.g. NGOs/private sector/civil society)
N/A
45
Annex 1 Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes
(a) Task Team members
Names Title Unit Responsibility/
Specialty
Lending
Michael J. Fuchs Adviser AFTFE TTL
Volker Treichel Lead Economist AFTP3 Co-TTL
Ismail Radwan Lead PSD Specialist AFTFW
Jan Walliser Sector Manager AFTP3
Bayo Awosemusi Lead Procurement Specialist AFTPC
Hawa Cisse Wague Senior Economist AFTP4
Gloria Aitalohi Joseph-Raji Economist AFTP3
Antonio C. David Economist AFTFE
Giulia Pellegrini Junior Professional Associate AFTFE
T. Mpoy-Kamulayi Lead Counsel LEGEM
Andrew Lovegrove Consultant ECSPF
Rona P. Cook Program Assistant AFTFE
Yeshareg Dagne Program Assistant AFTFE
Mark Zeydler-Zborowski Consultant AFTHE
Irene F. Chacon Operations Analyst AFTFW
Supervision
Michael J. Fuchs Adviser AFTFE TTL
Volker Treichel Lead Economist AFTP3 Co-TTL
Ismail Radwan Lead Private Sector Development AFTFW
Winston Percy Onipede Cole Senior FM Specialist AFTFM
Manush A. Hristov Senior Counsel LEGAF
Gloria A. Joseph-Raji Economist AFTP3
Mary Asanato-Adiwu Senior Procurement Specialist AFTPC
Irene F. Chacon Operations Analyst AFTFW
Pierre Strauss Economist AFTP3
Giulia Pellegrini Junior Professional Associate AFTFE
(b) Staff Time and Cost
Stage
Staff Time and Cost (Bank Budget Only)
No. of staff weeks USD (including travel and
consultant costs)
Lending
Total: 25.89 157,416
Supervision
Total: 13.32 124,712
ICR 14
Total: 4.03 23,546
46
Annex 2. Nigeria: Country at a Glance
Nigeria at a glance 2/25/10
Sub- Lower
Key D evelo pment Indicato rs Saharan middle
Nigeria Africa income
(2008)
Population, mid-year (millions) 151.3 818 3,702
Surface area (thousand sq. km) 924 24,242 32,309
Population growth (%) 2.3 2.5 1.2
Urban population (% of to tal population) 48 36 41
GNI (Atlas method, US$ billions) 177.4 885 7,692
GNI per capita (Atlas method, US$) 1,170 1,082 2,078
GNI per capita (PPP, international $) 1,940 1,991 4,592
GDP growth (%) 6.0 5.0 7.6
GDP per capita growth (%) 3.7 2.5 6.3
(mo st recent est imate, 2003–2008)
Poverty headcount ratio at $1.25 a day (PPP, %) 64 51 ..
Poverty headcount ratio at $2.00 a day (PPP, %) 84 73 ..
Life expectancy at birth (years) 47 52 68
Infant mortality (per 1,000 live births) 97 89 46
Child malnutrition (% of children under 5) 27 27 26
Adult literacy, male (% of ages 15 and o lder) 80 71 88
Adult literacy, female (% of ages 15 and o lder) 64 54 77
Gross primary enro llment, male (% of age group) 104 103 112
Gross primary enro llment, female (% of age group) 89 93 106
Access to an improved water source (% of population) 47 58 86
Access to improved sanitation facilities (% of population) 30 31 52
N et A id F lo ws 1980 1990 2000 2008 a
(US$ millions)
Net ODA and official aid 34 255 174 2,042
Top 3 donors (in 2007):
Netherlands 3 4 0 344
Austria 0 1 2 321
United Kingdom 5 25 23 286
Aid (% of GNI) 0.1 1.0 0.4 1.3
Aid per capita (US$) 0 3 1 14
Lo ng-T erm Eco no mic T rends
Consumer prices (annual % change) 10.0 7.4 6.9 11.6
GDP implicit deflator (annual % change) 12.4 7.2 38.2 11.0
Exchange rate (annual average, local per US$) 0.8 9.2 101.7 118.5
Terms of trade index (2000 = 100) 165 87 100 214
1980–90 1990–2000 2000–08
Population, mid-year (millions) 71.1 94.5 124.8 151.3 2.8 2.8 2.4
GDP (US$ millions) 64,202 28,472 45,984 207,118 1.6 2.5 6.6
Agriculture .. .. 48.6 32.7 .. .. 7.0
Industry .. .. 30.5 40.7 .. .. 3.8
M anufacturing .. .. 3.4 2.6 .. .. ..
Services .. .. 20.9 26.6 .. .. 14.4
Household final consumption expenditure .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
General gov't final consumption expenditure .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Gross capital formation .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Exports o f goods and services 29.4 43.4 54.0 41.6 .. .. ..
Imports o f goods and services 19.2 28.8 32.0 24.7 .. .. ..
Gross savings .. .. .. ..
Note: Figures in italics are for years other than those specified. 2008 data are preliminary. .. indicates data are not available.
a. A id data are for 2007.
Development Economics, Development Data Group (DECDG).
(average annual growth %)
(% of GDP)
10 5 0 5 10
0-4
15-19
30-34
45-49
60-64
75-79
percent of total population
Age distribution, 2008
Male Female
0
50
100
150
200
250
1990 1995 2000 2007
Nigeria Sub-Saharan Africa
Under-5 mortality rate (per 1,000)
-4
0
4
8
12
95 05
GDP GDP per capita
Growth of GDP and GDP per capita (%)
47
Annex 3. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results
48
Annex 4. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR
The Federal Government of Nigeria was invited to provide their own assessment of the
operation and also to comment on the draft ICR but declined to do so.
49
Annex 5. Comments of Cofinanciers and Other Partners/Stakeholders
N/A
50
Annex 6. List of Supporting Documents
128. The operation supported the implementation of reforms in the financial sector,
fiscal policy and management, and improvements to governance. Support for these
actions is based on a range of economic and sector work on the Nigerian macroeconomic
and financial sector that were concluded in 2008, including:
Financial Sector Development
Banking Sector Diagnostic: This report focuses on how the banking sector can be
a major driver in achieving the FSS2020 vision once it addresses the risks of the
sector, e.g. strengthening bank risk management capacity and banking supervision,
transition from Nigerian accounting standards to International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) and diversify lending exposures away from volatile industries
like the oil sector.
Housing Finance: This report address the issue of what can be done to close the
current housing gap, estimated at more than 17 million units. The report
recommends improving the time and cost of property registration, reforming the
primary mortgage institutions and the National Housing Trust Fund. The report
brings together some of the policy lessons learnt in the creation of mortgage
liquidity facilities around the world and presents this as a possible contribution
towards development of the mortgage market.
Social Housing: The focus of this report is primarily on the options available for
those further down the income distribution to finance their housing needs. It also
looks to cover other aspects of housing finance, such as access issues and the
availability of funding for construction of housing. The report is targeted at policy
makers both in the financial and housing spheres to consider a more broad-based
approach to housing policy than just relying on the private sector to develop
housing which will be paid for through mortgages. It suggests the need to develop
the Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) framework, create a national framework
for housing PPPs, clarify the micro-finance rules for housing products and
withdraw the proposed VAT increase on housing.
Pensions Industry Assessment: This report presents the background of the 2004
pension reform which was designed and implemented to: (i) improve the fiscal
sustainability and welfare adequacy of the pension system and (ii) create a well-
regulated, prudently operating industry. The report presents recommendations to
address flaws within the current pensions’ framework. It concludes by explaining
that the continued success of the pension industry depends on developments in
capital markets, public debt management policies, the insurance industry, and
interagency cooperation – issues central to the FSS2020 agenda.
51
Insurance Industry Assessment: This report highlights the fact that the Nigerian
insurance market is grossly underdeveloped and consumers are underinsured to a
significant degree. The report suggests enforcing compulsory insurance policies
and cracking down on fake companies as ways to quickly grow the industry. In
the medium term, Nigeria will need to overhaul the accounting and regulatory
framework for the industry, invest in improved IT systems and mount a public
awareness campaign.
Access to Finance: This report identifies key issues for microfinance, branchless
banking and SME finance. There are encouraging signs that access to finance is
poised for growth, but the sector faces regulatory issues. Improved information,
the promotion of credit registries, adopting a leasing law and operationalizing a
moveable asset register are recommended as ways of growing access to finance in
Nigeria.
Capital Markets: The report highlights the sizeable growth experienced in the
capital market due to structural changes in the financial system. The report
suggests that high cost elements might be preventing more companies from
getting listed on the NSE and impeding the development of an issuer market. Also,
the limited supply of financial instruments restricts investors to follow near
identical investment strategies with little opportunity for diversification. The
report concludes with recommendations to address these challenges.
Debt Markets and Debt Management: This report highlights recent improvements
in government debt management capacity and remaining areas for improvement,
particularly in the areas of strategy development, cash flow forecasting, cash
balance management and developing the secondary market.
Report on Observance of Standards and Codes for Credit Rights: The report
found that although the Insolvency and Creditor Rights regime of Nigeria is
strong in certain aspects it remains in urgent need of reform. The report concludes
that the principal legislation that drives the legal framework for insolvency and
creditor rights in Nigeria, the Companies and Allied matters Act and the
Bankruptcy Act, are both antiquated and do not incorporate the features of
modern international best practices of insolvency.
Nigeria Investment Climate Assessment 2008: The ICA 2008 was based on a
survey of 2,300 enterprises based in Nigeria. It concluded that Nigerian firms are
unproductive largely due to a lack of electricity, good roads and access to
affordable finance. Each year 16 percent of sales in Nigeria are lost as a result of
poor infrastructure, crime and corruption. Deepening the financial sector would
serve to boost the productivity and performance of Nigerian businesses.
Doing Business in Nigeria 2009: This is part of an annual series of reports that
compares more than 180 countries around the world in terms of the ease of doing
business. The report finds that Nigeria is ranked 118th
- a position that has
52
remained fairly static over the last few years. Nigeria ranks particularly poorly on
registering property, dealing with licenses, trading across borders and paying
taxes. However, the country fairs relatively well in employing workers and
protecting investors.
FSS2020 Change Management and Implementation Plan: The objective of this
report was to evaluate current/proposed change management approaches for the
implementation of the FSS2020 vision. The report reviewed the current change
architecture for transitioning the FSS2020 vision and provided recommendations
to strengthen it. The report concluded by suggesting that for the FSS2020 vision
to be successfully implemented, there needs to be a two-pronged change
management approach working concurrently to engage in changing a large
complex system and develop institutional capacity.
Public Financial Management
Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review
(PEMFAR): This report conducted in 2006 proposes actions to promote a sound
Public Financial Management Environment. The PEMFAR report provides the
analytical underpinnings for Government’s ongoing efforts to address the
weaknesses in Public Expenditure Management. The report noted that while
advances were made in macroeconomic and debt management, budget
formulation, accounting, and procurement reform less progress was made with
respect to capacity building, including in the Budget Office, and in such areas of
financial accountability as reporting, monitoring, and disclosure.
Debt Markets and Debt Management: This report highlights recent improvements
in government debt management capacity and remaining areas for improvement.
Review of capital budget implementation: A recent review of obstacles to the
faster execution of the capital budget resulted in a number of measures being
adopted by the government, including the early release of the capital vote and the
swift approval of the 2009 budget as well as the introduction of a template for
MDA’s to monitor and evaluate the implementation of capital projects. A
summary of the recommendations is in Annex 3.
Nigeria’s Growth Strategy
Employment and Growth Study: Targeted interventions to remove binding
constraints in employment-intensive value chains, in particular in the physical
infrastructure area, were identified as a key strategy to enhance the employment-
intensity of growth in a recent study by the Bank on employment and growth. The
study found that notwithstanding high, sustained growth in the non-oil economy
since 2001, the share of the population outside the labor force had not declined
and that youth unemployment was on the rise.
Chappal WaddiChappal Waddi(2,419 m )(2,419 m )
B a u c h i B a u c h iP l a t e a uP l a t e a u
S a h e l S a h e l
J os P
l at e
au
U d i H i l l sU d i H i l l s
Ma
nd
ar
a
M
t s.
Goth
M
ts.
BORNOBORNOYOBEYOBE
ENUGUENUGU
AN
AM
BRAA
NA
MBRA
ABIAABIAIMOIMO
AKWA-AKWA-IBOMIBOM
CROSSCROSSRIVERRIVER
RIVERSRIVERS
D E L T AD E L T A
B A U C H IB A U C H I
J I G A W AJ I G A W A
KANOKANO
K A T S I N AK A T S I N A
S O K O T OS O K O T O
KEBBIKEBBI
N I G E RN I G E R
K A D U N AK A D U N A
FEDERALFEDERALCAPITALCAPITAL
TERRITORYTERRITORY
P L A T E A UP L A T E A U
T A R A B AT A R A B AB E N U EB E N U E
K O G IK O G I
OYOOYO
O G U NO G U N
LAGOSLAGOS
OSUNOSUNO N D OO N D O
E D OE D O
AD
AM
AW
A
AD
AM
AW
A
K W A R AK W A R A
ZAMFARAZAMFARA
EKIT IEKIT I
EBONYIEBONYI
BAYELSABAYELSA
NASARAWANASARAWA
GOMBEGOMBE
Benue
Niger
Nig
er
Sokoto
Yobbe
Rimma
Niger
Kaduna
Bung
a
Jamm
aarii
Hadejia
Gongola
Be
nue
Yobe
Komad
ugu Gana
Taraba
WarriWarri
BaroBaro
KontagoraKontagora
IllelaIllela
KauraKauraNamodaNamoda
ZariaZaria
BiuBiu
BaliBaliWukariWukari
ShendamShendam
NguruNguru OamasakOamasak
PokiskumPokiskum
WawaWawa
AbaAba
SapeteSapete
UyoUyo
JosJos
AwkaAwka
YolaYola
GombeGombe
KanoKano
AsabaAsaba
YenogoaYenogoa
EnuguEnugu
AkureAkure
MinnaMinna
DutseDutse
OwerriOwerri
IbadanIbadan
IlorinIlorin
BauchiBauchiKadunaKaduna
SokotoSokoto
GusauGusau
LokojaLokojaAdo-EkitiAdo-Ekiti
CalabarCalabar
AbakalikiAbakaliki
UmuahiaUmuahia
MakurdiMakurdiOshogboOshogbo
JalingoJalingo
KatsinaKatsina
AbeokutaAbeokuta
DamaturuDamaturuMaiduguriMaiduguri
BeninBeninCityCity
BirninBirninKebbiKebbi
PortPortHarcourtHarcourt
LafiaLafia
ABUJAABUJA
N I G E RN I G E R
N I G E RN I G E R
C A M E R O O NC A M E R O O N
B E N I NB E N I N
C H A DC H A D
To To KandiKandi
To To KandiKandi
To To BoriBori
To To LoméLomé
To To DoulaDoula
To TahouaTo Tahoua To AgadezTo Agadez To NguigmiTo Nguigmi
1963 Level
1973 Level
2001 Level
BORNOYOBE
ENUGU
AN
AM
BRA
ABIAIMO
AKWA-IBOM
CROSSRIVER
RIVERS
D E L T A
B A U C H I
J I G A W A
KANO
K A T S I N A
S O K O T O
KEBBI
N I G E R
K A D U N A
FEDERALCAPITAL
TERRITORY
P L A T E A U
T A R A B AB E N U E
K O G I
OYO
O G U N
LAGOS
OSUNO N D O
E D O
AD
AM
AW
A
K W A R A
ZAMFARA
EKIT I
EBONYI
BAYELSA
NASARAWA
GOMBE
Warri
Baro
Kontagora
Illela
KauraNamoda
Zaria
Biu
BaliWukari
Shendam
Nguru Oamasak
Pokiskum
Wawa
Aba
Sapete
Uyo
Jos
Awka
Yola
Gombe
Kano
Asaba
Yenogoa
Lagos
Enugu
Akure
Minna
Dutse
Owerri
Ibadan
Ilorin
BauchiKaduna
Sokoto
Gusau
LokojaAdo-Ekiti
Calabar
Abakaliki
Umuahia
MakurdiOshogbo
Jalingo
Katsina
Abeokuta
DamaturuMaiduguri
BeninCity
BirninKebbi
PortHarcourt
Lafia
ABUJA
N I G E R
N I G E R
C A M E R O O N
Bioko I.(EQ. GUINEA)
B E N I N
C H A D
Benue
Niger
Nig
er
Sokoto
Yobe
Rima
Niger
Kaduna
Bung
a
Jam
aari
Hadejia
Gongola
Be
nue
Yobe
Komad
ugu Gana
Taraba
Gulf of Guinea
KainjiReservoir
Lake Chad
To Kandi
To Kandi
To Bori
To Lomé
To Doula
To Tahoua To Agadez To Nguigmi
B a u c h iP l a t e a u
S a h e l
J os P
l at e
au
U d i H i l l s
Ma
nd
ar
a
M
t s.
Ni g e r D e l t a
Goth
M
ts.
Chappal Waddi(2,419 m )
10°E 15°E
5°E 10°E
10°N10°N
5°N5°N
NIGERIA
This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other informationshown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World BankGroup, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or anyendorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
0 50 100 150
0 50 100 150 Miles
200 Kilometers
IBRD 33458
SEPTEMBER 2004
N IGERIASELECTED CITIES AND TOWNS
STATE CAPITALS
NATIONAL CAPITAL
RIVERS
MAIN ROADS
RAILROADS
STATE BOUNDARIES
INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES