Docimnent of

The World Bank

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

R~pd No. 8716

PROJECT COMPLETION REX'ORT

JAMAICA

THIRD EDUCATION PROJECT (TECHNICAx AID VOCATIONAL)J(LOAN 2070-JK)'

JUNE 8, 1990

Population and Human Resources Operations DivisionrCountry Department IIILatin America and the Caribbean Regional Office

. doument bas a resrited a wuomd mamy be aued by eipit ny i tIe pef ofoffr icial dutis Its congent may, not othwie be dilsd withot Word Dank athotlzat

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

-o - a - -

CAST Co11._e of 't., Sci*ce- 'Q T',huo1ogyI- _ uman Employmt sad R.aourc.. TnstIPCs - Industrial Produw ±ou (n t*ro

~~DA IMinistry Oil Yo*tithmy ~ miitry of 8duc6io

- IO M3 . - tl of llov 0) l \ 1112^. - National Dewlop"imut 4r

-., P1OJ~ - P OB vIetute of Jamaica-Pom.rly: Naitial Plsnning Agency)

FPIU - Project Implementation UntVTDI - Vocational Trainiz Deylopmt Ztntitute

Curee Bechana.. Rtes '

JaJamaia Dollat per 09$ (Period &**erage):

1980 - *18141981 - 1.7814

; 1.7814i'

V , -'

., t. ' o " " FOR WMIAuSEonY'~~~~~~ ~~THE W^QftD BANK

0ut of Oscr.GmwI -.... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~AOpmumn [vAhtuwm

June 8, 1990

MEORnDUM TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS AND THE PRES12EN

SUBJECT- Project Completion Report: JAMAICA - Third EducationProlect (Technical and Vocational) - (Loan 2070-SW)

Attached, for informationi is a copy of a report entitled"Project Completion Report: Jamaica - Third Education Project (Technicaland Vocational) - (Loan 2070?JM)" prepared by the Latin Anierica and theCaribbean Regional Office, with Part 11, of the report contributed by theBorroker. Wo,audit of this project has ieen made by the OperationsEvaluation Dejartment at this tsme.

Attachment

This document has a restrted distibution and may be used by recipients only i the puonanof theiir official dutds Its contents may o otbefwise be disclosed without Wotdd aIk au :isdo

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

TH UCT ION IMOJECT (TECMEICAL AND VYCWAONL)(LOAN 2070-J3)

: ,~~~TAL oBOF CONTENTS

Page No.

Preface ............ Evaluation Smmary ............... ,o. iii

-. PROJECT REVIEW 1O3K BAWL'S PiESEC?I1 ................... 1 3.

Project Identity 1Project Background ......... 1Project Objectiveos and Description* 2Project Design aiid Organization ........................ 2Project Implementation ............................... 3Major Results of the Project ........................... 4Project Sustalinability ........................ 5Bank Performauce ............. .. 6Borrowers P#rfoe izice **.. * .- .. 7Project Relationships t 7Consulting Services 8Project,Documontation and Data 8

II. PROJECT REVIEW PRO BIRRORgs PhRSPECT ****.......... 9

Adequacy and Accuracy of Factual Information -In Part III ........... 9

Evaluation of Bank'. Performance andMajor Lessons Learned . 9Evaluation of Borrower's Own Performance andMajor L"ssons Learned ............ 9

III. SATISTICAL In1ERMATION 11

Related Bank Loans ..............Project Timetable llLoan Disbursements ....................... ...... 3.. *..*..*.Project Implementation .. - 14Project Costs and Pnang ....... 15Project Result ...................... *. 17Status of Loan Covenants 19................... .. 19Use of Bank Resources . ....... 20

Ths dument has a ticeddstibutio and may be usd by rn lnts on in th peformanceof teir ofl duties Its contens may not otherwie be disckdwihout WodBelnk authou n.

k~C - .K~ -.-

Works, _urniture an Eiquipment

C Tibl o£ ontt (ccFtempl 't ".

Table 2 Plannd and Actual Utilixation of TeAbnicalAssistance by Institution ... 2............... 27

Table 3. Restructiornal Staff in Project Institutied .. 27Table 4. Planned and -Actua Enraollemto and Outputs,

,~~~~o Poet .- Work8, tioniuProgran qimsn ' ..................... 28

Table . Civil Works Procurement .Scedule as Agreed~ .. Between Bank Mission of JanuaTy 1982

and G.6vern6ent ............................ 29

-- 'C Between Bsak Misslon of Janvasy 1982 :

Z.3- ' 2

N~~' 'C , '

4 ' ;~C

~~~~~~~~i-7~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ --4 V. - ' " 4-

PROJRCT CbtIPULRTON RXPRT

\~ ~ Ta OM O ELQ (DM& am Lq | N; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' .\,

* 111 lED EDUCTON POCT(TEINCA AND VCAONAL(WAN 20704J)

This is the Project Completion,Report (PCR) on the Third,EducationProject in Jamaica, for which -oan 2070-JM of US$6.8 million was approvedon lDcember 15, 1481. The Loan was fully dishursed and closed on June 30,1988, three years behind schedule.

'The PCR was prepared by the Population and Ruman ResourcesOperation Division, Country Department III, Latin America and theCa ibbean Regional Office (Parts I and III, with inputs from the Borrower),and the Bozrower'(Part II). A .

The PCR is \ased on the'find4ngs'of the Bank project completion -mission to Jamaica during, November 1988, discussalops with Govrnmentofficials involved with the project, and data fr9mithe project files in theBank.

V~~ ~ ~ K

.~~~~~~~~~~~ K

*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ \

K - -

- r - ~ -So\s

.. ~ ~ ~ ~M "' . V ~~- p "oic 'T ' NCAL ;'

* TilEDM IMW.ATIJM VQpCTCM _M)

(La" 1070-Jif)

-e . .\ _ o

-. - This was the third Bank asprojeot for the improvement ofeducation and trainiag ini :JUica 'at the secondary and post-secondarytecbnical levels. The fix-at , two were completed In 0ctobei 1973 and l4&rch1981 respectively, and were succe~ssful i_ attainment of project objectives.-This third project was. designed to'\supplemeht and complement the first. twowith furtho* assistance to post;-secondar technlcian traixking, and toinitiate Banlk assistaniqe in nonformal voainltraining for o%it-of-schoolyouth and unemployed young adults..-- It wes apipraised iin April-Nay. 1981enapproved in.December 1981. Total costs were eatimated '*t Os$11-74 mill 4 nof which US$6.80 miflion was fiuaticed by. an IB1D'Xoan\ 'The prpj>i:trequired:sim3(yeiars fat- cumPletion;\ three years longer than projected. \ the

,lon was clo"d,on 61 30188. In scope the project was implemeoted essen-tially a. planned. and 9` because *f uccessive devaluations . of ~acurrency,AAthegact%#l, project-costs at cmlet-ion were US$12.12 millin(3-more than or estimte).

ObIectivsand noiect C6,ntant

2. The projc adchessed the maj or issues of the technical andvocational education and training system bys (a) selective expansion oftlesystem in line vith mppower needs; (b) improvemnts in the quality oftratning at the CpllegeA of Arts, Spience nTciluy(A) and theVocational Training DeveUpuient Instsf ite t,(VTDZ) ()e t)apro e ats in thePlanning, \msnagement and supervisory capabilities of the symn ea; and, (d)'assistance' for the primary edtacatitos system through a pre-investment studyfor the., preparation of a primary education proj ect and the design ofeaching matermils. lThe projrect inbluden construction,' furnishi'8

equipping and technical ssistance -for the epanson andlor replacement o*:(a), CAST, departments V of tehnical teachsr educationy, computer science,

loan er8 loedrin ron ra 6130188 Iasoetspoetwa mxeqtdQs

tvocational instructor trs,inina b 6pst (c)''EMUK system, National IndustrialT~raining toard, and two new 'trMAiAng.penters 'for tourism and agricultur4k;-(d) ,0 primry schools textbooks-teachtrs manu4Xs -.rodUcLon an (e)i pre-

investment preparation for future education projecte'

* . . .~~~~~ ': .

\-I 0 -

; :\ = ; -~K;

3. 4° e project experienced delays \mplmentastion of civil9wovk6&Aponents rang4ug frali zero, to 36, tonthl,~ vit an veragepio 14 imntl-dfor~the eight sub-coaponeat4. Procurment of frniture and egiipt was "so'dcl ged accoirdlngly. tnetlreff major factors reipanigb l; Vero: (ay a 9 delay of four to five months in contracting and initiating construction in'the first five builings4 tb) a further delay of 8-28 months in completion'of two. of those facilities due to 1;ha insolvency of -contsrdctors andreXuired re-tenderingi and (c) during the most austere period of fiscal

'tiLtenIng moderate to serious budgetary and cash flow problems incounterpart funding of civil works. In hindsight it is evident that thedelay 1i ¶onttacting, and initiating .-of construction, in' partiular, -couldhave been Xeduced by more 1.ntenpive Bank 8uperv,ision at that e e y stage ofimplementations.

Erolect Res-ulta"

4. Project' enrollment .~snd output goals have significantly excedeeprojections. AXtainment of planning, management and instrucNional staff'improvement and curriculum upgrading goals are in excess of targsr These

K quantitative and quslitative gains bave ptovided the i*st tutiona base forthe attainment of I;ect4*al policy .gbales. The HEART 'project' tra1t lgcenterj\s ~ar,or t~he first time in Jmaica makiizg it.poslble for .ut-of- ' -school :yout) -and adults, eho -may not have completed- secondary .sct,ol,. toobtain training 'in the arasm of hotil= an- tourism skills and a-piied

- _agSrieiltural productionw=- As a, result of project 4iputs, CAST continuas to- -i~favorable rengogtio4 among local and'egional Bovernments - businessand industry- becaute a s upr ding of- facilities, equipment, course,'idonter 7and fa&ulty and management staff qiia4ficationwI and innoiativen4des'bf ins'trucision. -

Proiect Su!talnabilit-

,SMajorachievements of Jamaica' s deciade long commitment to economic Xadjustment have,been the restoration of esonomic growth and an increase In _public financing of social \\ervices, inclukdhn education' and training.This more soliU fiscal 'foundation helps ensure coAlinuing financ *h of su¶hoperations. Prj ect sustainability ",is also strengthened as A, reult of. theexpanO4ng demand for training services and selected, institutional e fortsat generation of additional revenu¶ through cost .recovery schemes. \As a

Koonsequence of theso actors and th*, 4uality of, the training program, asdiscsaed in , L4 or above,'there is no dpubt that. the EhART and- CASTtrai2iimg programs are sustainable over the mediuAn nd_longer .terms._

L*wons Ids~larned .A -; -6. The major less4e learned or again confirmed, with. implications to, \,other projectse s,ret

'(a) Project lmplemenettion and the B mon torlg should bede4igmed and managed to begin,Immediately aoter negotiAtions.

o' - . C '

\ . e K - =. ,:o ' ,%\\ ~ ~ , . -k S 0 0 . ;

(b) Supervision uiissiona should, in-eq-fat asloitica1l.po.aibl. bo fielded at appropt! and fl-4 intorval

< .. ~for tiwly intewnton in tho prevention of 'probles ow re4uctione in severity of their .ffect..

(cA Vhenevs major changes ' in the local organisationresponsible for project coor4ination, -. ank superviory staff KahouldU practice the saoe 4gorous proce4ures In assessinS thenew PIU as were used in the approval of the or4inal one .

(d) Overall calimunicatiois betwe tbe Bmnk nAdothe Borroer -ishould be sufficien 4y veil lcuseited so that whes theinevitable 'change. in mission p rsonnel occur such c a eswil-l not u,9duly affect project ipIementation.

(e) An equipueit specialist should be mads avaslablq in eachmajor participating justitution to make a thor6ugh review ofspecificatins'before going out' to tonder. -

VV.

A~~~~ . -- .X -

* .- ,

V % a ~~~~~~-- , 3 - . o~ j . . ,

\ -^ , . \. S { , ,

- - V \

't - '

*~~ " ''

V ' \ ' ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~'9'- ' S'3) . ' o ';. ' ,"-

K' -.

TK1D RUCAON ROECTE4 ~iSIAL kI VOCATIONAL)(LOAN 2070-3M)

I * PROJECT RIVIE am01 matK a UPITV

A. Pr> 1c Idnt\ . --VIf, _

-Project Name \t 1hird Edu,cation Project NLoan Number t 207,0-m

-RVP Unit i iLatin Americai and Ca~ibbean Rsg$~onl,,Country DepaitmenitII

S;r, : Jdulatioa

SUI)s :a Technical and'Vntoa

B. Proiect BmEREPOund1. S~estor, Develonment Obi e\i_as (At time f Pr etapria), n A

*~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ,= prisl' ,In

-c lomot

-suppoirt of the Govermsent'ls iet,a so4 to 'POMLe a deve1om~t through a -major pro4uction and ekp?rt effort ihln~ian nr#e\iemployment' oorta ities, the bwumdiate' obj ectives, of the education mind

-training erove the .qulity and roductivity of expen-.ditur. on education and train.g; strengthen education pla. and manage-ment; and selectively expand training services in -priority st-ds.

2. .olicon . In view of the .entra role Of education andtraining in the social and -economic de elopment -6f Jamaica, the'jove t educ%tion pli2 phied: (a) prTviding educatioanal oppor-tunit les fo all \\chi.ldren through ag'e 16, as availablq, resources wouldpermit; (lb) strengthening existing training institutions, including. .hedevelopment of curricula, course syllabi, teaching-learninS materials, andmore coet-8ffective approaches to teacher and instru.

mor _>- trainingr an Tebi(ladfoaina

streamlining the trainioag system to facilitate timely' and e4fective res-ponses to th, evolvi4i. lab-or market requirements.\

_ . -~~~~~~4

3.' inkaes et~re~iPro salact. $ -ector and~co olc Ojctios polheproject was largely successful in linkVg project, Cy\obj.tives (Port III).m It hbd a generally high level eosuccesi in meetingor ercee4ing ites obJeties o¢selective expgnsioj.and qualitativi-improve-ments to meet changing labor market, utrequiremenio, and of. impreaements'inthe tra,ining syst44's ~planning and mwtagageuet ca~pabilities., These achieve- entso directly fuithered the attaitent otjo the educatien anduc traningsector dseloprmit objectives, as set fort14 in pars. 1 above, aitd in turn,-

. . .t . . .

o 5 > - l ESs~~~~~~~~ 7\- G, G'C .

*, 2 'C ; s

i , ~~~~~~~- 2 - - VK\ - - e *

C. Protect Ob e _ttves an Deac;Aption .

4. Protect Oblectives. The ptoject addressed the major issueo of thetechnical nd- vocational education and training system bys (a) se4ective-e3on don of the system in line with manpoer ;edsg im provi*ts in-the quety of tra-ning at the College of Arts, Science. and Technology

.- (CAST) ad the Voctlonal Training Devilopment Institute (VTDI); 'and (c)£tnprOvVm.ikts in \th planning, management and supervisory 6apab#ities ofthe system. The prbject also assisted\the rimary qdpcation system througha pre-investmeri; study for the preparAtion of a primary educatLon projectand 4th desaign of teachin&matertal. '' A loan msendment it late 1984

in clnde4 assistance, in eipan4iin a new initiative in lowL ost intensive\xa1nif >for, #uth; e\umh E mploynt le#ources Trlst (HFRT) training.

'system,I..Te rj~

5. Pro1ect Comonents. The proje it included opqsruction, fur-nUaLO,ng, equipping and technical assistance for, the espansion andlorreplacement of: (4 nex 3 for, dettils).

K \ (a) CAST \'Pepartmknts of Te hnical Teacher Educ"tion, ComputerSci*uce, Applied Sciences% Library/Learning Resources Center,'\and Naintenance Unit; --

(b) VTDI-'Vocational In.trucitor Training Shops (5)t ' ,

(c) ,HEART System, National pdustial Tsaining Board, and newtraining centers 'in tou4si and agriculturt;

(d) NU0 primary schools textbooks-teachers manuals productiongand

(e) Pre-invStment preparation for new primary education project.

D. Project Destamn aid Oriaistioz .

6. iased on information available t, the appraisal'nd po -appraisalmissions of -11179 and 4101, the conceptual foundation for the project wasappropriate'and clear. The project coneept had been developed, with inuitsfrom Bank staff, by the participating institutions ministries over a three-year period of, time (4/78 t4 4181). However, adjustments in strategyinitiated by,.the new government inaugurated 1i 1980\alteotd somewhat tte"plementation of certain aspects of the project. -While, in the shortterim. thise changes\may have adfertely affected, for eiample, the piannedoutputs of the VTDI instructor trsping- program, they ha,ve generally beenOf '-. pots*ive nature, especially for the medium and longer terms (pares.

C -) 37-38). -\ , - ;

c)Thi8 vx substituted for the' Y *try of Youth (NOY) \components, whichvwere to include the National Industrial Trtbing Bo,ard yset, ,and the

',two I#ustrial Production Centers, by Joan Ameudment of 10130/84'-and06 - K K. --.-

: .s. ?. -. : pr6oltwa 1l I Ats ti -gQd 'se e ,itiatet in that v. t. t8 prwd -- ear4j in Atihe ni &dMlUlStx*tJQ \L t4tinherit'edan e¢ in)sodbus declluo ith un\ mploy t hih as'27'.-

.\. ~The" also.. hitd -boo a sig'nificau `,eniSttiosn of skilled **Alerf f-or seve ral -.. ymwrt, vosultXng In -o toodily growin$ national demsxd for smay kinds of,:

Skilled workeirW *it toebhictans. 8~hift ln'dremand f6r employmet-was alsoo.1 uitimtoiey ofiaetod byi stobtllsation ad adjustment progrsms lntroduced in1 the middlA yearo .'of b 90.B ito mph^Pis on flgxible, :Imteasivo

, trai pIn$x ew .skillwas wiU. trinitng ervicts dtei tein to youth and school-'. ieatert ithe prolect w spp ly, a4y amended and Implamineatiedn v8 an.nusur iunn ovativn awe for ismain n d f m n of,

{. 8. ^\wCritics, Var' e8 In ftojeet leDmentatLon. Three factor reprinle wLly miponsdbebl for slowne.Sh Li dject implo emltationy t (a) alsudelayof$our -to flveb mouths in contracting aud s ntpiating construetcen inthe first five bua ldo gst (b0 a further delay of 8-28 months in tbe comple-tion f two of ithose facitlities due tti the insolvenecy of the contsactorsoleanvd the repultingroe-tenderina of boeth dand (c) during. the'e\mt wastaeeriod-of fsc easrtieiou c4 f low Problems in

0 I tightening S' -mo

.ounterprt) lundita of CAST and VTI cinA wor-s iroj ftplementati0nUltimately req!ired thres -7ears 'boyond the original estima%ies

8. rlt\ hindsight it is ein 4po tl\th the delaye en contra.ctors ard.nitiation of tonstruction qoul have been lessened by: (et the apprmtt adission followtng-up to ntssren that thc "agneral l4Ui if preutlifiedo \ontractors, rev40"e duin *tgtolns p ptly approoed byby the,h nmen rst f uhir -than (our afther delayo vf 86mthsxin m4 e d ple-

tenaering and contractlagi and,,(16) fieXd1nt snotker viisionv, with 0e4pentialtechnical persofnnhle, duringt 05/82, 'thei ile Bank haof. tht recenred 8tarotresIs repot of )3eptracts sognabd as bad been' dureedin tUre ` 'the 01182-;ul-imaStly rather than yaietag until 01183. esiats-

t9. In conrasot. it is not Aikely that tany feasible actior could davoltedt te insolvency problems ot\the two civili v6ks.c.ontractors,' nort cashtflownprble. These condotonns were phrt be lssaeerl of the devolopins

issonomip and o -inaucial crisise that the stabglizatian program has beend d'4signed to address. .--

II. r Ptros, retike. Of the potential risks oientff ad.by`the btppraisamiosiont, onlyth. tentimfly rva olabothy of counterhart funids od ithe, avy i

dabinty of some instructors (bor) Vfidn gn sionf . i eosential

12t Unfoehsee Jaactors du Af ing i58 w ea* Imleentatickh .no The ucned-ppected bolisbment of oie tatioiiil Devedopais Agenay (re)e 'which thad bepn 012estilishida toh among other tbinlap s18eir3.C ros-0eCtbral or trosi-institu-tio0n oordnratit itand nacted during the initiy fsibgles' ac ther prou ectsmflam rntation unit (Part Ih:ePara% 8 aw a Part aIn p ara.e .o e)-fin evally

' o8ni and t'filaca cs te ' te owing thb dissolution of gDra ho delegate itb projes ct s.osiblities to a a le prQoeci ,miesiemen,tionlt successoro led to aey of conterpart u andtahe aqlip- '\t procurement. \ e une -

pqtd blshmn' of(5 th tItoua 'edo~ Ag'c (W) wic ha bee ^ -.st.t4ished'~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro amn ote t.ns Geur crs-etrlo osisiu

Di _a ,oriato-n ace duin th \inii~l s.e a. th p.o .t

-4-

13 The sec'ond factor affecting pr!j.ct implementatiwi ultimately had'poAitive impacti on' *f focti7eness of the proj ct investmentes The rapidgrowth and hlg^ level of sauceses of the HIARE training system dur*ng 1983and 1984, ind tho significant oxpansion of the Ministry of Education (MOE)techical and vocational training system "sisted by financi4g from other&ap,urc*9, led to a Government decisiati to phase out the inadequatelyfinanced MM skill training system. Consequently the decision va. made,and a#eeod to by the Bank in late 1984q to substitute HEART tra4ningcenters for the MOY-IPC centers. Although this change resulted in a 17month 4ncrea.e in the t4me re,.,guired for iqmpletion of the project, it was apositive 's'1ep in itreamlining tbe skills training system and improving (itse ffi4 and effectiveness t"rough the adoption of an improved trainingmodel.

14g. Actions or Deciio,ns Taken or notDTaken which Affected Pro1ect1 t One factor related to the diqsolution of NDA had adverse

iffect6 oan mp tation. Thi was. the combined faiiure of Government andthe Bank to e tish a caccounting system that could track the availabi-lity of r loan funds, by category, t the time H4,RT We ineludev

Kt') . in the project AAs a gonsequence H4ART overspent its equipment funds(through.prompt procuremiu),` resulting in a short4e of loan funds 'for

T .AS nd,dolay# of about 18 months in acquiring gvernment funding and in-rocurememt ,,of tie swpplementij equipment.

if. M'nor a da'-Zhg troject

(Retor to Part IIl for Projec,tProfile at Completion),,,I . - . ;.

15. Prolect Objectives. With. winor exceptions the project objectives\were -iore the fully met. The attatnment of quantitative Soals were signi--ficantly inL 4ess of planned o*es. 'As measured bys the excellent and.freqUent cone ita of business and induetry,lesderso the excellent reputa-tion that CASTa,snd ERT now hold In Jamaica, among. Caribbean regionalinstitutions and,*ith spec$*lists in the United States and Canadian insti-tutions as wellt 'and the total volume of assistance 'for 4UAT and HEART'provided largely by grants fom -other international agencies \greatly!exceeded original estimates. .,

16. Imua-t of Project. (a) Sectoral' Gowth andI Policy ttainment.The qualitative and quantitative developments in the CAST and HEART train-'ing oystems, and in the VTDI in-plant'instructor training progrsam, haveprovided the inst*tutional base for the attainmept of sectoral policygoals; and (b) faniower. Emolovment and Industrial Develovmqnt'i The HEARTtrainlng centers are, for the first time In tamaica, making it possible foro4-acf-school youtY_ and _ adults, who may not- havo, completed secondaryschwil, to obtain high quality and relevant training under modern, condi'-tions 'in the. areas of hotel asd tourlm skills and applied 'agriculturalproduction. Employmentjopportuinities i4 the former are' \xcellent, and,' asdiversification and-p rductivity increases in agricultur, are a governmentpriority, employment opportunities fotXihe latter are expected to increase.At the time of. pom,pletiont 171 trainees had praduated fro4t the hotel and,toiriem programs and ll of them were promptlr employed by major touriqtresorts. In ttW first'year of operation, 260 e loye.s of touriist villla,

resturd"ta, tour groups, etc. participated in upgrading courses.,:The CASTcontinues to gain recogniti,o among local and regional government, businessand industry by its continuing updating of facilities and equipment; theevident releVance of curricula nd course content developed with signi-ficant inputs from localindustry upgrading of faculty and managementstaff qualifications; innovative modes of instruction such as, itsinduotrial Internship scheme for full-time engineering technology andcomputer sc*Vme students5 and the computer operators. on-the-job modulartraining cor with the larger c panies; numerous agreeuents with otherregional oh. sand with United States and Canadian colleges and univer-sities;r' ar- participation Aof faculty in improving reg&onal secondarytechnical JiK< ula and examinations.

*. Proiect Sustainablitv

17. Major achievements of,Jamaica's decade-long commitment to economicadjustment has been the restoration of econot c growth and a sharp increaseof public financing for social services, including education and traizing.Th*s. more solid fiscal foundation helps ensure, continuing finance of op'ra-tions. Sustainability is also secured as the result of the expandingdemand for services and through selected institutional efforts at genera-tion of additional revenue through cost recovery schemes. There is nodoubt that the REAR1, Hotel and Tourism Skills' Training Center is sustain-able over the medium and longer terms. The design output of 250/year fromthe hotel and tourism programs is only 2.5S of the work force in thetou4sm ind4stry, or barely enough to replace attrition losses in the\sectdr: The very high quality and location of the physical ilant and thequality 'and realism of its training program (it has its own 20 ,room delu*ehotel and provides additional restaurant service 'to a group ot nearbyvilla.) assure' a steady flow of incomes In addition to the hig8 quality ofthe' physical plant, equipment,.and the large and practical livestock,andcrop production facilities of tAe Agricultural Training Center, the effec-tLve management of the center by the Ministry of Agricultural helps toa ssure the sustainability of this training center. The sustainability, of,the CAST programs is also high due to: (a) day students' fees financeabout 20S of per student costs; at the same time t.he recent 131 total"enrol1mint increase, in.new and well equipped facilities, wa entirely in-art-time and evening classes with the latter making up 701 of the toual;(b) the evening class students ara lrgely employed workers whose feet paya highei percentage of the total costs than those of day students; (c) thet'chnlic4 teacher training program is the only source of +eachers for theexpanding.teebhn.ic 'secondary school system$ (d) its programs are the onlysource of medium = end higher level technicians and technologists in theountry for the major employment.growth sectors of the economy (manufac-. turin, construction and setvices) whose growth during the 1980 to 387'period ranged from 502 tQ 802; 'and (e) recent permission, t grant adjunct'faculty statu to paFt-tile.and evening class faculty will help to assurebetter quality faculty 'and reduc unit costs. Althpugh it is the onlysource of certain types of in-plant industrial ski-lls instructors, the VTDIa, vocaticial instructor training program may not be sustainable in itspresent form. Twenty-eight, of the thirty-two industrial training centersof the MY, for which VTDI suppXied instructors, have been closed since1983. Although it trains some instructors for the HEART and.maintenance

'V

instructors/woikers for the miltary, the future of VTDIs 18 unce"tain as i is now constituted. Its role for the 1990's must be're-deftned'. With th4cooparation of CAST and others a more viable med*m term role is currentlybding prepared.

H. Bank Performacea

18. Esior Strengths and Weaknesses. Bank staff contrlbuted to theasof the project through supportive working relationships and profes-

sio1al advice.,, However, some ohortcomings vore evidents' () the initialdelays in construction could possibly have been reduced ,if the Bank hadfollowed-up immedistely after negotiations to eusure timely Governmeuisaction on civil works contr.cting. In fact, a supervision mission withessential technical staff was delayed until January 1983. By this tim thecivil works scheduli vas 4-5 months behind schedule (Annex 3, Table 5); and(b) after'the March-April 1984 mission through project closing on June 30,1988, some project changes occurred and moderate problem in civil worksand equipment procurement were common (Part TII, para. 35 and table 12).But during the last fourvyears of projedt. implementation of this technical-vocational project, only two ot the six supervision missiond included atechnical educator. In the interval from November 1984 to October 1985 nosupervision mission was carried out. During this period the NationalDevelopment Agency (IDA)t the PIU, was dissolved..

19. \LSlons Lg#xMd.. The pri#aipal lessons learned or again con-fitrmed, with implications to other projectst as a result of the experiencesduring prqject implementation and the preparation of the PCR are suuarizedbelow.

(a) Project Implementation and the Bank0s monitQring should beginimmediately after negotiation.

(b) When a \supervision mission finds unanticipated and aigni-Ificant delays in implementstion, it should inform governmentauthorities as to the delays and requept them to seek solu-tions. A prompt follow-up mission sta'ffld with appropriatetechnical specialistW should be agreed and comfirmed by Bankmanagement. -

(c) Supervision missions should, in-so-far as logisticallypossible, be fielded at appropriate and flexible intervalsfor \ timely interventions ia the prevention of problems orreduction in the severity-of their effect.

(d) 8upervision missions occasionaily lacked continuity of,members fully knowledgeable of the ptoject, or members withthe proper specialications to aid the PIU and participatingirAnstitutions in implementation matters.

A

,, V - , ~ ~ ~~~~~~1 I

7~~~~~~~~~~~

£') Whenever a loan is amended to change the composition and sizeof project coaponents, the Bank sbo-*ld inform the PIU and thenew organi tioniss to the amount of loan funds available, by,'categorles of expenditure, and ensure that appropriateaccounting practices are in plaee to track expenditures byca!omnent and participating institutions.

(f) Whenever a major change is made iQ the local organizationresponsible for project coordination, Bank supervisory staffshould practice the ame rigorous pr6tedures $n assessing thenew PIU as were used in the approval of the ir'iginal one.

I. Borrowe Performance

20. Malor 8trenetho and W aknesses. Except for the initial delays in4intiation,of civil works tend4ring and contracting (Part I, paras. 8 and9), the NDA performed well the PIU until it was dissolved in early 1985.After that date implemetation (largely managed by the participatingtraining systems themselves) suffered from the lack of guidance and cc+ rdi-nation, particularly reporting on cOaitments and expenditures, even thoughthe Project Division of the MOE was assigned as the PIU. '.During thisperiod, implementation of the two HEART centers was carried out well inview of the substantial increases in the amount of civil works. The tech-nical assistance:comp9nents-of each of the training systems was implementedefficiently and effectively. The specifications. of much of th4 earlyequipment packaiea required considerable reviiion, and additional time,before being successfully tendered.

21. Lessons Learned. The major lesson learned by the participatingtratza systems, after the dissolution of the *DA, Vas that an externallyfinaneed project incLuding several independent organizations requirescentral coordination if it is to advance smoothly. A second lesson worthnoting was that even though preLiminary equIpment lists 7re available, say,at n6gotlations, equipment specifications may well require additionalpreparation and thorough review by supervisors or a PIU equipment specia-list. It is common to underestimate the additional technical work and timere 4ured to finalize the bidding documpnts.

J. Project Relationshin t 22. Imnact if Relationshias on ProictImnlementation he suceess ofluti6n of thean amiablt et uorkn. theltosithis project (Part I, paras. 15-16), esspite the unexpected problem ofdiisolut40n of the PIU, is. a result of thae aaal trking relatiotishipsbetween the Bank and the Borrower, and between the Various participating-groups themselves. An additional contributing factor was the high level ofprofessLonallsm of all parties involved.

.t ' I , ,, - .I

'23. Role, Pgrfo e Lve1 and of Invoiement. The:n of t toST nd AT education d tralning systms could not hav4

been 4ttained, vithout the kinds and qualities of consultant inputs thatwere received during the project '(Part III T.ble 8 and Annel 3 Table 2).About 751 of all SpQc,alist assistance wa provided from sourCes outside

K the low and nelped to enable a 3652 increase i the total consultant-optts of-assistance, including a 1252 Increase for'assistance in planning

and management for CAST, EART and VTDI.

L* Projeet Documentation and Data Y"24. Ade-qacy of Staff Apnral(al Renort and Ma'jlr Workins Papors.Original docu4entation for the project vas adequate. A number of workingpapers which \are most necessary to project implementation' could be boundseparately as an Implementation tool for the PIU, participating institu-tions, and Sank supervision staff. Easy access to this format would helpensure iFstitutional _meory if project 'taff change or, as in this case, if

K&' alVndXellt8 introduc. new project components.25. Avalalbility of Rejevant Data to PCO Mission. Although a pre-mission seminar was conductid with senior staff of partiqipating, institu-tions about four months ahead of the PCR mission, the devadtating hurricaneK a few weeks later significantly hindered prompt preparation of data.

all was made ready for discussion before tba end of the mission.'j

k~~~~ ~ ~ - .--

'K~~ ,

9~~~~II.. PROJJCT REvIEW PBiOIIO IRLS PERSPECTIVE

A. Adeuuscv and Accuracy of gactual Information In Part III

26. The country data, defining the project profile at completion aspreqtented in Part III, was prepared by the particips+tlng institutions and.discussed thoroughly in the field. It was collated into the four mastertables in Annex 3, cross-checked with-the field tables, and these served asthe basis for the tables in Part III.

B. Evaluation of rank's -Performance and Ltgson Learned

27. Bank peroonnel were recognized as professional in all respects.While mlssidi members were always highly qualified in their respectiveflelds, there were occasions when the composition.of supervision missionswas not appropriate to addresd the kinds of implementation problems occur-a ring. The length of time between some missions, especially the 12 mouthinterval betmeen the October 1984 and October 1985 missions which came-at'a time of significant changes in the project sandproblems in Implementa-tion, was excessive.

28. The malor lesson learned is that the overall communicationsbetween the Bank and the Borrower, including aecounting of commit ents anddrawdown of losan proceeds, should be sufficiently well documented so thatwhen the changes in government or mission personnel occur such changes willnot unduly affect project implementation.

C. Evalustion of-Borrover' s Own Performance and Lessons Learned - -

29. The performnuce of the partic4ating- iinstitutions in overallproject planning wa quite good. T4e Implementation of the specialistasoistanca-ndT fellowship programs, and especially in cErriculum upgradingand improvements in planning and administration of traintng programs, werecarried out with little or no problems.

30. The \equipment specifications for the first ICB tender were notadequate for tendering and required considerable revision by the BritishCrovn Agents, who were contracted as proc4rement agents. This had littlenegative effect on project implementation;\ however, if there had been nodelays in the completion of civil works, this deficiency could have beencostly.

31. After the dissolution of the MDA, ihich had been operating quiteeffettively as the PIU, no formally constituted and effectively operatingPiU was frganised. Each participating group - CAST, HEART, VTDI and theprimary textbo k team - was made responsible for implezenting its owncomponent. Consequently, there were no cleat lines of autho*ity in projectmanagement and no coordinatio of the various project compon¶nts. Unfortu-nately, one of the participats, as a result of not knowing the amount ofloan funds available for e4uipment, overspent its allocation. This ' resulted in a corresponding shortfall in the funts for one of the otherInstitutions, X difference that was made up by thI government.

- --

-10 -,

32. the malor lessons Apurned re: (a) s specialist should be *adeavailable in each ma3or part"i4iting institution to make a thorough reviewof equipmuent specification. before going out to tegderg and (0) any#roject., empecially one with more than one participating ministry oragency, should hpve a central coordinating unit with clearly stated respon-sibilities and authority throughout the life of the project.

A

;~~~~ V . i* V - .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

K ~~1 _ \

>~~~~~~~~~r:. tu X ON - \ K~~~~~ K

A. Related lsnk Lan

Table i: IBID LOW RELVANT TO TIE PROJECT

Loa Number Year of Purpoqe of,Project Title Approval Project Status Couments

\. .

la. 468-JM 1966 S Secondsry Completed Both,projects.Education I - comprehensive 10/73 suffered

and post- delays due tosecondary lack oftechnical counterparteducation and funding an ad

. ~~tia'iniug, - fre-'en'i tn,cluding - '~~~ ~~''~ changes inteacher trainsIzzg implementation

- and agricultu l personneltraining.

Ln. 727-J4 1971 N CompletedEducatio II 03/81 _1

La. \2899-JM 1988 Educ. Good ImplementatiotiEduc'. Program Development going wellreparation and stude4it Loans. .Student's Loan

B. roi ect TLImetable

Table 2: PLAIED, EVISED kAND ACTUAL DATES OP PRrCT TIMETABLE

Item )Panned Yate *R$sed Date Actual Dat,

Identification Mission, 02-03/78 - 0*-03/78Preparation Mission I 04178 - 04/178Preparation Mission II - 06-07/78 06-07178Appraisal Niuslon 11/78 11178Post-Appraisal Mission 01/80 11-12/79 11-12/17Re-Apptaisal Mission - 04-05/81 04-05/81Loan Negotiations 04180 k 09/81 11/09/81Board Approval 06/80 12/81 12115181Loan Signature - 01J1$/81Loan Effectivenes\ 12/81 04/15/82 03/24182

V Project Completion 02184 12/85305/86;04/87 12/31/87~Loan Closing 06/30/85 01/86;06/86;06/87 , 061306/88

- .%E~~~~~~~~

(N K~~~~~~~12-

33. K comnments on Tuebe.?z adverse ec*n ±\eand social conditionsenistiag in Jamaica during the latter years. of the 1970's resulted in theproposed ,project belig placed on 'hold" In midr4979. After the 1980 4anmgein the Cov'ernaient, discussion. between the Baok and the ',:ew administration

Kvere re-ooened and led to an ftreeumet to re-appraise the' proposed 'projectto re .c hg#i h oconomic setting and to Incorporate -the~plane of the new administration. Those circuawnetsce which. resulted in some initial delay, nsvertbelese, lttuately led to two positlve develop-mute. *The-, first of these vas the creation of the NUAT training system, which quicklyv grew out of the project requirement that a N41,onsl Training,Board be promptly dovelop,d (Part I., para. 4). The second was the avail-ability of more adequate counterpart funding for the expanded civil works'

trora of CAS9 which enAbled it to become' asucizessful post-secondarytchnician training institution *A additional positive t~esult of the

dlely vas that the rapidly inproviung seoa and political clinate, under.the new adaAnietration,, attracted a large aomout of bilae\eral specialistaspistance and fello"hip training.-in support of the project: institutions

N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

(P~~~~~~rtZ, pars. 16): - K~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C

CZae SJ§t ClU BTIVI AID DISBUR8 \ . ~~~~~IXJS$mill,oa),v.

> anmk TY 1983 1984 '1985 1986- 1987 1988r V~~~~~~~~~

Appr:i.al Estimate 0.60 2.00 < 6.80 - -\ActuaS 0.5k '1.67 2.23 2.66 \3.23 6.80.\Actual as I of Estimate 96' 60 33 39 47 100

Date of Final Diebursement 06120168

Time Line of Paaued. Revised snd Actu-Dbur,seuiet Schedules

$7.00 -

5.00-

4.00

1.00 -

0.00- 1983 11984 198 1986 \ 1987 1988

Original E:-t1mate and Revi ed\Estimate of 09/30/83 _ -Revised Estilmate of 01/83 - - - - - _Revised Estimate of 03/31/84 _ _ --Rvised Esti-mate of, 10/22/84 _ - --Revised Esttiate of 06/01/86 - . .......... .,Actual Schedule

- ,, \~~ ' \' =,.N,, ,, \

'N\ _.' ' :V U -N *.

5 * > 9 - \ \ \'$ '-'i 7 --~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N

C g - -e

D. .Proilct lnplementati on t Delay

m oTable 4 Lt 013AiDCTL CMlETIO DES OP COHPONEUTS

--J n -Buld Planet Actual M ot14 oProject C eonntr CRplv 0 on Copletion Dely

Ci:vil WorkSs:

TableSt PROJCT COSTS

M stimted CgoetLocal Foreign Total~ Local Foreign- Tot-al

Category Costs -Costs Cost's Coats Costs Costs,

Civil Works .~ 2.58 6.4s 13.64 1.27 4.9.1Furniture & Equipment 0.26. 2.39 2.65 1.67 2.54 4.21

Project A~Tuinietrationand 'Profssional"Fees 0.69 0.1 0.86' 0.96 0. 02 \~0q9

Technicsal Assistance' 0.07 1.40 ' 1.47 0.03~\ 1.82 11.85

Pre-Invest0Su3110.14 .0 .0 0.17

Total 4.94 6.80 11'.74 L64ASA121

35. tono. The cost overrun in U$ vas onl. 3Z oforiginal estimtes and foreincost estimatfs were 162 Us, than estimgted.-The project as essentially Fiplemented as Tplalnd, with funds for the twoIN centers trasferred to HE oRTfor us's twos nes centers and the costsof t1ue\removerchanges &0ere d2.e largely to thefact tUat, during the, period of project implesmetation, the increAse in..the

rJ$ iflt miottain Ira

echnflatioa \osts of civil works, fu 1.4itu 7I project -administration andthe pre-investment study was considerably ;;W!e than offset by the l0r.17rIncrease In the valu. of the US$'to- he J.

(U5$ UlilliQll)

PlannedSouices of Funds. (APR' Repor*~) Ravised Final

IBRD Expenditure Categories 6.80 ' 6.80

bomes4ic \4.94 ___ 532

Tqtal Pr6jed~\Costs\ l7'~ 2l

35rnal Sourens (in suppo*\t

Opeidtilistl,Aesistiance -2.70-PellwahSp "TTotal from Elternal Sorces

T*iL COS" T.0\. .. w.ia l£do

: 16 -

36. Comments on Pritect FInaIcina (Rofer Amiex 3, Table 2). Theextornal financiag Was i4sd to finance an additional 289 mn-months ofspecialist asaistance and 95 4taff-months \of fellowship training abroad,both of which were laresly directed toward imbrwment ln institutionalmanagement, and sot latruction in those programs (of the -project ilisti-tutlone) not assasted by loan funds. The sources of thiur 'funding werelargel] bilateral grants.

\ lg 7t ALLOCATION OF LOAW PROCEEDS,

Originals, Actualtu,Category Allocation Disbursements.

:\ : . \ffi\ -~~~a.~------------ U$$ -----------------

( .-1)} Civil Works 1,967,000 - 1,300,129.06

(2) (a) Furniture, 2,321,000, 3,417(,l568.19Equipmentand

Materials

-A (b) Costs of inter- 48,000 0.00'\national procure-\ment .assistance!nder Part B (6)

: '? oef the Project.

(3) \ Project Administration 152,000 100,458.49and Professional'Fees

(4) Technical Assistance 11f386,000 1,892,415.51-and Fe4owships ..Under the Project"'

(5) Pre-investment Study\ 289,000 87,428.75(6) Unallocated -- I 000 0.00

-e-. \ .TOTALi .) '\ 'S6,800,000 \ 6,800,00.000

K ~ - * A>

17.G

;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 0

T.*bI m . IRI0T BIUITS 0 PROJECT

C' -Est~Imat.d at:\, Indtzators 0 Appraisal Closing Date\ Full Development

* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' \ A-

Enrollmwts and (NIMtuAts) . .(Refer Anex 3.p 3) 1984/190

Full-time Tratnees ks(Loan supportea'-programs only)CAST (PTE) S85 (9Ss) 654 (208) 675\ (215)VTDI '70 (70) ' 60 (60), 70 (70)HEART - 720 (650) 750 (715) (715

'Part-time Tr (71ees5S(Loan supported ..

program8 nly)CAST 250 (250) 0000( (2000) ,

HEART flD \ 470 (380) 340 (300) \ 470 (380)

9~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ Vk«L .-gai ''C- ;(Study,tou s1nternships) , \ 'Plannin ad 3 .c ,-Mbemagment .3"m .99 s/m

° . ' s8tructi@n.l c- 177 olm 203 elm -

- S 8ecialiat Assistance:.o:' Planning *#d

Management 36-_rn mm,Curriculum

Ulpgradi. 48 ,? 309

sCreation ci ~IatIonal \- 12318 '~ -'-2 ^ *'a

Trainie Bcgt &/3/2 '1-2131182

- Develou Plannina & -i , 1 'CEvaluation Svstem -1 0

CAST 12131,/82 b, '6130184 ' >ITDI (4 it1J20/30/874 > -'@- ;rm ' 12l1182- 06130187 -

OIUT . X ,30 a - o S

- l ..'. z °N . -- e

'37. Met eeisOA4 Prjojec. AnroUiment and" outputs' goals havealiveady bpenmfet- or will -have been met when' institutions ge e fully opera-tional in th* IM9-90 school yea r. -Planning and,-management Improvementgoals, asa .srd-y~eilit*wsac n pecial training'/Internsh4p4p abiodd, 'are bot'l' about 3002 o torsets, thianks to other'

.xte~ti~sn~ig. urrtului - upgrading , assi.sted 'by -specialitst, was"64 0 -ftairset, while instructor upgrading w" .1k52 of target'l Planning,piaciment- an follow-up Systems, are int operation in all inet*tutionso.

Zghj: PROJECI! STUDIES

7; - -~~~ 'Statfus -a- ~~~~~~~App~rae Study

Pro-Investment Study:~-.Primary 'extbook Devel 1pu ent Of Comopleted, Too early

component learnins but nax to oval--materials- ad4quataly uatle ulov.

- ~~~~~4 teacher guides tested yet.

Project & ~~12 textbooks.

PloetPreparation Prepardtion for Actiyities carriedComponent a new projeoct out, but have been

* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~. ~~ after ~due. III. delayed kor

* ~~future project. '

Commntsona StutdiesCoonns -

38. While the 'textbooks ed teachers guides have ~eneraliy met withapproval by reviewinig primar- teachers, they, are still bei-ng refined andminor editing is Still unde*~ay by, regular NOR curriculum staf f. Fieldtesting In selected schools will be c rried-out during the -A989-90 School.yetr. .They, are expected to~ go into f7Ll. production. under- pojects fundedin-the-peridd 1989-1991.

4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.--.-

t~~ ~ 0

G. Statue of Loan CGvenans-

I rbo 1Q OSLIANCE WITN LOAN COVENTS

Sectioncovenant Status of Clapleuo

3.01' the Borrower shatl carry out the project In full c4Wlimnoe, with thein cenformity with appropriate pratices. excepton of moderate delvys.

02 The 8rr hall eoy0 specialists in In full cut tiance.a, . , .,with prinrciptes -ndr poedu '

.-.,satisfaoy to hel. '

.3.03 The o roawer shal estab a ft;a t ,, In fu*t 114Iance-ty;industrelt Trainr Soa" o leite thvt 12131/Up -d Is - 0.

- - ' ;\' 1241r- ' ' c ,+ts' -e,- l2' 14> . . i ',t, t'

3.44 A ptan for ewaluation of performnce of All in futl ooplianceeach institution shall be sent to the anlk.- between 6/30184 andn- e later th+n Cecr er 31, 1982..

3.05 (i) The Borrower shatl prepare or Ramtis not prepared, ;ut maintenanceprovIde a maintenance mwaal fOr fs good ln .ll project Institutions,the upkeep ot bLdltdngs. Including oLder bu ldings.

(if) The Borrower shalt gfve adequate Nalatenence staff are"training In the uminteriame and quailfled.uukeep af Oatultdin..

3.06 The Rorfower shall cause the bal dings In full compliance.and equipment included in the project tobe adequately maintaingd.'

3.08 'the Borrower shall taintain recorsle on In full comptiance thriughrikhe progress, allow for Bank missions to out ipltementatln cycle. visit Ithe faciFities, and furisbhinfra"tion requested by the lank.

3.09 The Borrower shall saqu1re, no tater than in ftitl compliance,30. 1982, sites for the constw6tion except as delayed by oan\

of project institutimis' uw*ents-

4,02 Audit Report due within four months Reports weri delinquent ntIt theafter end of fiscal year. -v Governmaent's FY84, uhen an Indepen-

dent auditor was appoihted end audited- all aecomts, inib1Iing former years.

-,Went ep etvebeen carried+ -_ l ) out Ithouah submdssion to Bank have

been up to tour months late.

{ . - - I ' ' . . q , /~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5

-20-

}1. S of Bank Resources

-Tsble ll: STAll IlPUTS BY STAGE OF PROJECT CYC1L IN STAFF WEEKS

Fiel HQ Fielftei~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~,

.h., ugh;.rh - 36.4 48+8 :8.8 ,

Apprioisal - ,Board Approval

board Approval -.f fectiveness -

supervision 12. 3yrs) 26.0(6yre) 2009(6yrs)

39. Staff In.tVs. ;n regard to the reductions in staff-weeks ofsupervision frot44 Weeks pr year to an average of less than 3.5 weeks peryear, attention is called to Table 12 on mission d4ta. - t can.\be seen th~atduring the last half of the implementation cycle, when overall projkctmanagement was de#eriorating and financing and4procurement were never abovethe moderate problem levels, the average otaff weeks per year of supervi-sion was only about 502 that of the fi*st half of the cycle,l and note¢hnical educator was i*cluded in any of the mi8sions. This add otherevidende discussed in Part I, Section 1, Project Implementation, clearlyin4icate that the reduction in supervisory staff and, the type of staffpr4bably contributed to the three year overrun in implementation.,

Aj-s. . . . .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

!t - j - 0 '~~~~~~~\

*\ K . -21-

- l - . Sable 12: IISSION bATA ' STAGES OF PROJECT

Staff K Performace- Monthl No. of Weeks Statui by

- ~~mission year Persons La in Field Activity lb

Ldve. . 2-3/78 .4(19GOGRTS ) 4-° iF:.p.\ C,

K,~~~ - 23 -I

~~~~~~~Au''l~~~~~~~~~~~~~-

' \ ~~PROJECT C OR~LTO REPORT

JAMAICAV

THR EDUCATION PROJECT (TECHNICAL AID VOCATIONAL)(,LOA 207-M ' I:

't,,K,2 . , ',,' Particinante ik, Csleion:,

'World Ba-k

W. Wesley Hobbs, Technical Education Plenner - Analyst

Ministry ofPEducation

Miss Patsy Patterson, D#rector-of ProjectsMrs. Lola Williams, Acting Chief Education Officer for Curriculum

'Develooxt

Mrs. Joan Fai7lonuh, Project CoodinatorMrs. J. Gibsonw Project Accountant

Dr. Alfred Sangster, President KMrs. Althea Russell, Placement OffieerMr. George iwper, Head Science Depa*tmentMrs. Hermine Salmon, Read LibrariaiiMs. Sonia Baker, Assistance to President ~'Mr. Reuben Davy, Head Maintenance CenterMs. Dahlia Fuller, Read Computer Center A.

Mr. Stanley Dunvell, Director of ProjectsMrs. Joyce McKenzie, Deputy Iirector of Projects

. Mr. Valentine Mitchell, Deputy Director, Ebony ParkAgri,uitutal Skills Training Center (and senior staff)

Mr. Hugh Wint, Director Runaway Bay Resort, Skills Academy,(and senior staff)

---- I----~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I '

Mrs. Jennifer Cadogan, Director of Non-Formal Training for NOYMrs. Eleanor Allm6d, Training OfficerMr. Hector Lawrence, Princip4l of VTDI (and senior staff) K

kKo .,

-24- y -

, -.z2COF.EI-N Page I of 2

. t. ~PROJ13CT, Tl: RPO '

THIRD EDUCATION PROJECT (TECHNICAL AAD VOCATIONAL)t LOA 2070-3M)

R Lwcaw nf ft,o,;eca Psomeas seD048 S,u,ttodAN (ay Year) '

* -- ; t s -\> - > {t >w} ! . x 1,a$404 t i

1. February 2*, 1980 Naigtonal De.opsent 4g~c LsrLtd Ptogr.4aeK'~ - t. : . .. 'R*pdrt to Febraary 15*, 1980 .

2 December 1982 - Qaiterly Report\No. 1 'fo.eriod. . . 'September-1982 (Dational Development Agency Ltd.)

3. January 7, 1983 Status Report as of December 31, 1982 (NationalDevelopment Agency Ltd.) and Pre-InvestmentReport I through January 1, 4983

4. April 11, 1983; Pre-Investment Report II for the Period JanuaryN to March 1983

5. September 14, 1983 Pre-Investment Study Interim Report for July toSeptember 14, 1983

6. September 30, t983 Pre-Investment Study Report IV for July toSeptember 1983

7. September 26, 1983 Weekly Project Report from W. Ormsby to T. James(National Development Agency Ltd.

8. September 28, 1983 Miniztes of Site Meeting Held at C.A.S.T. Science *K ' Bloik by Marvin D. Goodman and Associates

9. October 4, 1983 Weekly Project Report from W. Omeby to T. James(Natiofial Development Agency Ltd.)

10. October 31, 1983 Weekly Project Report ftom D. Warren to M. Dean(National Developme_t Agency Ltd.)

11. November 15, i,983 Weekly Project Report from Warren: toArthur-K K; tgEllis (Narional Development"Agency Ltd.)

12. November 21, 1983 ' Weekly Project Report from D. Warren to T. James(Natiqrl Development Agency Ltd.)

. .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

-25_.

I. ..S s V ^ V ~~~~~~~~Page 2 of 2

13.November 28, 1983 Weekly Project Report from D. Warren to T. James(NationAl Dvelopment Agency Ltd.)

14. December 12, 1983 Weekly Project Report from D. Warren to T. Jams(NatioqalmDevelopment Agency Ltd.)

iS. Jauary 4, 1984 Weekly Project Roport froam P. Warren to T. imJses

g ; ; t r (tr tbt >t t~~~~tlttds- --.

N.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o

1;. J,nuory L 3 1984 ' iply Weyt Report fr au D. 'a 'r.' .ao -Ae '"T

. .; ,;u.*. 1 .Jm. (atio nalt t-nD pevt AWt y Lntdy. ;. Febanary 6*3 19*4 Weekly Project eport from D, Waxrsin to A4.

1984 Pe Natoneal Development Aec t.18. Jenuary 130, 1984 Wekly Project Report from D. Warren to A.T.

James (National Devplopment Agency Ltd.)

19. lebruary 6, 1984 Weekly Project Report from D. W-arren to A.T.,. , " qames (National Development Agency Ltd.)

20. Mebruary 13, 1984 Weekly Project Report-from, D.'tWarren to A.T.

James (National Development Agency Ltd.)

21. tebruary 20, 1; 4 ^ Weekly Project Report from D." Warren to A.T?K. James (National Development 'Agencyt Ltd. ) t . \ '.±2. March 3, 1984 Weekly Project Report 'from b. Warren to A4.t.,

, '~~

-26 K

K g V - V c^Annex 3-K. \ - . Page l1of 4

THIRD W¶'I~MTLOI PROJECT (TCHICAL AND VOC-ATIONAL)QLOAM2070-3M)

Mionths MonthBuilding Planned Actual De3*y Planned AculDeiay

CAISTS'~-Science Wing 11/83 01185 14 12183 01/85 13ChemicalTechnology 11/83 01185 -4 '12183 12 87. 48gtoanusuce

.~Uit 06183 05/83 -1 k12/83 02/84 144Library 04(85 19 12.83 .01/85 13. _ _Tdchnical.Eduoati~n 06/84 06185 12 07184 .~07/85 12

Cotputer . . NScience ~~~04184 03185 11 06/.84 03185 9k

VTDItWorkshops (5) . ~06183 06/66 36V' 0718S 10/86 39

Training .C"nter . 05/86 09/87 16 1-2/86 10/87 10

AgriculturalTraining.Center 03/87 11l/87 8 03),87 12187 9.~-

~/SubiRtituted,, through Amandments 'to Loan Agreement of 10101184 and -k *. 06/111851, for the two HOY industrial pro4ictiorn training centers.

A1 -

27-.. k

Page 2of 4

Table.2: PLWWK AMD ACTUAL UTILIZATION OFTECMilMC ASSISTA*IM BY INSTITUTION

Inhtituti9n lsWoeialiaAcLs1 Di fanc_.-AJUO

-~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~ -. - -. - - 27 -- k .u ----

Q AST` AU - ' 43 .

~.- it Pae oK~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .

36 42~~~~~~~

c , ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T

- Total. 84 391' +-3651 '20 3,02, + 462

at The cAT compoet wa,\ substituted for the iO't-IPC opnetthroughamenment to Loan Agreemient of 10101/84 n0618.

Of which k0 amoths of peci.U.Xa assista3lce and 30 staff-mqpiths offellowships vere" financed ficim bilateral or other sour'ces 6utside.theLoan. ' _c Of hich72 io- ths of Specialist ass;Lstance and 56 staff-monthsfellownships were financed froa bilafra Pources.taneuon ,p.ofwhich 197 moths of specialist assistance and 9 t-mfellowships vere financd from bilateral or other ce outside the

ijoaiw.

TU bl I3 STUCTIa T IN PRW*EC;. INSTITU?,S - -

luatructiou~l Theory, Lab/ShopIntLttution. 'Supervisory, Instruzctors Total-s

C"ST 7 140 '147

* -~ I ./; 31- 32

= tel aTndv T-orism Center w 12 1f0 22Agricu.ltutra Training CAtr.

_ 1988 8 .9 71989 10 40 50

cj O s$h 2mntso se$e$= asstnean 6 tf-mnh

followsi$ps aero flnsacet from~~~~~~~~~-biaealuces

-- ~-i1 Oxwhich 1+ monthsof spac$list assstanco at 9 sta£-wonth 0'

,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - , .

_skie.A: PLANE A*.ACTUALT AND OUTPUTS OF PROJECTINSTITUTIONSIPROGRAWS

Enr8I28r M t

Program lmd Actual .P6n~ Actual Diff.

.' .I

~X'eq4ii~s Z*~t~uc. 405 458 +l 135 5 +1C~~m~ute~ 8cie~is~e 9* 7 l$OPU~ 4~. /~5 2$ 36 +44-

Oomput,~r #uport 259 Z.000 470 NARh I

1~ot4s 83$ 2,654 +2Z81 195 2* 7

(19)- (Outputs projected) *Instructors ISkilled Worke.s.:.(New Program)s . -A

4fedhanical Nnt. .12 A 15 + 25 12, 15 +25-Radio/TV Hat. 12 14 + 17 12< 14: 917-Aut0b;iJ Repair \22 10 -54 22 - 10 -54-M:r Cond. IRefrJ$. 12 9 -2512 9 -25~,.-E-lectronics -0>.-b-Total.g 70 60 1 -141 70, 60 -42

Exist. Int. T- S. 44. .4 -. -4_.

HEARTRote~l and Totri5Im Center: (91/89) 1-Full-tine .,226~' 252 + 15is 240' *20-Part-time - 320 260 -19 NO 0 228 -12~Agriculture Center: (1989 ).q-Rasident S50. 500 7 0 450 475 +5 -Part-tim. -1A .O 12 3 . 72 .40

Totals 1,190 13,092 -8 1,030, 1,015 -1.

_A AOf which 43 vere founded by HEART to return as certified insipuctors in

; * k.I .f w o .,4y; 5t.r.3. are in :nw instructor training programs. Reas.nI

X;hich 2 y - t 0

* for this a~ set4orth in the discussion of this table; but 'mainly ItIs due to CASTpus ncreased role in instructpr traiing and decreaed-demand for VTDI level of instructorstraining, in these progs.

ClI These twot,centers were substituted for the tvc~ May-iPC c 6,rs through

_d This ioni lamd of the pgriculture center is till' underdevelopment andwilnot be able to accouDodate the full 150S +2a 5 of

Api t-tr traifn.s befre 19. art-tin dnrolIIent goal of32OIyOa r of u hi Cetel Center is erected to be reahed in 1990.

- -Psrt-tfime - - 320 260 - 19 2'B0 228 -12 - -

29\ _-

: \ \ % k~~~~~~~~~~~~Anei 3 V \ \ P45e 6 of 4

-\T.sle 5 CIVL WORKS SCHDlULE AS AGitI I) B- -A B MISSION 01 JAUAY 1982 AID GOVERRIKT'

Teuder- \ 4otract C 1vil Work'sThtitution Date Su Intiated, But14l FPlsted A4il Paqd Actual Plared Atua

- W- te -c, ; .;. 04442 . 0748 05182 I.182 - (.1;¢ Lbai~ .011#r 06/82 04184liQI~~~~~~~~~0

VTDI- S shops 9 01/82 03/82 09/82 06)482 11/82 .(2 buildings '

A , '\ _- ' X V ' ~ ' ~ '- -. .'

.\

' \ * N '\ ' ~~-' \ K-9\

\\\, ~ \. -

K.-U -.

V X .k s ,. ' a q :~~~~~~~~~~~~~- . - -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

.- ,x , .. -