MOLSON U*KE 010

RECEIVEDMAR 8 198-}

MINING UNDS SECTION

WORK REPORT

ON THE

PROPERTY OF

554588 ONTARIO

(CORONATION RESOURCES (CANADA) INC.)

HEMLO AREA

SAULT STE. MARIE MINING DIVISION

NTS. 42C/12

Prepared by:

JENS E. HANSEN, P.Eng

Geotest Corporation

Nepean ( Ontario

February 27, 1984

Project: 60-108

m

42C12NW8883 42ci2Nweeie MOLSON LAKE

INDEX

O10C

PAGE

I . INTRODUCTION

11 . LOCATION AND ACCESS

III. PREVIOUS EXPLORATION

IV. GENERAL GEOLOGY

V. THE AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

VI . DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

CERTIFICATE

1

2

3

3

4

4

5

6

APPENDIX A - DIGHEM REPORT RELATING TO THE CORONATION PROPERTY

FIGURE I - LOCATION MAP

MAPS - l Total Field Magnetics 1:15,000

l Electromagnetic Anomalies 1:15,000

l Filtered Total VLF EM Field 1:15,000

l Resistivity 1:15,000

l Enhanced Magnetics 1:15,000

-1-

I. INTRODUCTION

554588 Ontario Limited has acquired a 12 claim gold prospect in

the Hemlo area which has in turn been optioned to Coronation Resources

(Canada) Inc. Three gold deposits have been discovered near Hemlo by

Lac Minerals, Goliath-Golden Sceptre - Noranda and Teck-Corona during

the past two years. The deposits are apparently hosted by altered and

sheared volcanic and related sedimentary rock i of early Precambrian

age Sulphide minerals accompany the gold mineralization and this could

lend the deposits amenable to geophysical prospecting.

The Coronation property is located approximately 7 kilometres

southwest of the Hemlo gold deposits

A preliminary exploration program for the property consisting of

an airborne geophysical survey flown by Dighem Ltd in December 1983 has

been completed

The survey covering the Coronation property was part of a more

regional survey covering several properties.

A total of 17 line Jci^jmetrjes j)f^ geophysical data were gathered

over the 12 Coronation claims, using three separate instruments namely

a magnetometer, a Dighem III helicopter borne electromagnetic system

and a Hertz Totem 2A VLF-EM unit.

The objective of this survey was to obtain a complete set of

geophysical data over the property which could be used to locate

specific targets for detailed ground followup. In addition the results

of the present survey can be used in the future as a base for reevaluating

the property as more information concerning the geology and structure of

the Hemlo region becomes available.

-2-

Two targets were located by the airborne geophysical survey

II. LOCATION AND ACCESS

The location of the Coronation property is shown on FIGURE I which

is a copy of a portion of claim map G603 of the Molson Lake Area.

The western boundary of the property is alnng the township line

dividing Lecours and Bomby Townships. It is 5 kilometres due south of

the Hemlo railway siding.

Access to the property is most easily accomplished by helicopter.

At present there helicopters based at some of the motels along Highway

17 within 30 kilometres of the property.

l" -. -A BOMBY TWP. PROJECTl * ' r '-V PORTION OF CLAIM MAP C-6O3

j..-. MOLSON LAKE AREA t^Z V^ .* -

ff^jfrv)-

""t^..-i—iw ^ d ui 1 ,W ^i J -- -' TJvM*' "**'|i ' rT~- f

j?l^-iH^isna?Ki^ihfeiC?^*^ l ' " l ' ' - m t *" ~* fi" ' T * '•l '^iL^L^L™.!^nCi:.j

-3-

III. PREVIOUS EXPLORATION

According to the writer's research, there is no evidence of

previous exploration over the specific area covered by the claim group

The geology of the general area is described by T.L. Muir in OGS Report

217 .

IV. GENERAL GEOLOGY

The general geology of the Hemlo area is shown on MAP 2220

'Manitouwadge - Wawa sheet 1

The area was subsequently mapped in greater detail by T.I.. Muir,

Geology of the Hemlo Area, OGS Report 217

According to report 217 the Coronation property is located within

the Pukaskwa Gneissic Complex which consists of biotite - hornblende

granodiorite. The claims cover a mapped mafic volcanic unit within the

granodiorite Northwesterly trending lineaments cross the property-

Map 5094 White River, NOEGTS Data Base Map indicates that the

surface geology is characterized by bedrock knobs with ground noraines.

The surface is mixed wet and dry with undulating topography. Geological

Map 2452 accompanying report 217 shows few outcrops.

.4

- ..,'-.Uv' A:^^^rfc\':;i.;.^.^^p^M;|iiTiiii .^i^^^&^iW^Mil^S

V. THE AIRBORNE GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY

The Coronation property was covered as part of a nore extensive sur

vey program flown by Dighem Limited and supervised by Geotest Corporation

over a number of properties in the Hemlo region The specific devails

relating to the Dighem system and the Coronation property are copied

from the Dighem report and form APPENDIX A of this report

A total of 17 line kilometres of airborne data were gathered over

the claims.

VI . DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

The airborne results are discussed by Dighem in APPENDIX A of

this report There is no specific reference to a particular target

within the Coronation property on the Dighem report.

There are no electromagnetic (DIGHEM) anomalies within the area sug

gestive of typical massive sulphides . Attention is however attracted to two

northwesterly trending features on the Filtered total field VLF EN map

which coincide, with obvious northwesterly trending photo lineaments.

These feature's are probably shear or fault controlled

One of these, extending from the southeastern corner of the pro

perty across the central portion of the northern boundary coincides with

a weak magnetic anomaly

A similar parallel VLF feature is noted in the southwestern third of the property This VLF conductor does not coincide with magnetics but a weak northerly trending magnetic anomaly traverses the conductor

in the vicinity of Lines 4 and 5. The intersection of these features

could be of interest*

-5-

If there is overburden in the area, it is probably shallow.

VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Two specific targets were identified by the airborne geophysical

survey. It is recommended that these be investigated on the ground.

It is possible that the VLF features arc caused by slightly con

ductive clays in a fault or shear but they could also be indicative

of weakly conductive sulphides in a shear

Ground followup can, at this stage be confined to investigating

the two VLF targets. They can be located on the ground using a simple

handheld VLF unit The immediate vicinity of the conductor should be

prospected or examined geologically and geochemically.

A total of say 50 geochemical and,or rock samples on each of the

two VLF features should be analyzed for gold, mercury and arsenic.

A field party of two could accomplish this in approximately one week.

Further recommendations concerning the property would be depen

dent on the results of the above program.

Res;

February 27, 1984

-6-

BIBLIOGRAPHY

MAPS

MAP 2220 - Geological Compilation Series - Manitouwadge - Wawa sheet Scale l" B 4 miles.

MAP 5094 - NOEGTS Data Base Map - White River Scale 1:100,000.

MAP 2167G - Geological Survey of CanadaGeophysical Series (Aeromagnetic) Scale l" a l mile.

MAP 42C/C2 - Department of Energy Mines and Resources Topographical Maps Scale 1:50,000

MAP P494 - Geological Compilation Series Scale l" B 2 miles -

REPORTS

Bartley and Page, 1957 : A Geological Report on the Hemlo AreaDepartment of Industrial Development, CPR.

Muir, T.L., 1982 : Geology of the Hemlo Area - OGS Report 217.

Open File 555 : Regional Uranium Reconnaissance Program, Lake Sediment and Water Geochemical Survey, Geological Survey of Canada.

DECLARATION

I, Jens Eskelund Hansen of the City of Nepean, in the Municipality

of Ottawa-Carleton do hereby declare:

l. That I am a consulting geophysicist residing at 19 Nesbitt

Street, Nepean, Ontario K2H 8C4.

2. That I am a graduate of Engineering Physics of Queen's Uni

versity, Kingston, Ontario in 1964 and have been continously

engaged as a practicing geophysicist since that time, and I

am a Registered Professional Engineer in the Province of

Ontario -

3. That the foregoing report is based on personal supervision

and examination of the airborne data discussed in the report

JENS

Consulting Geophysicist

Nepean, Ontario

February 22, 1984

APPENDIX A

DIGHEM REPORT

RKLATING TO THE

COHONATION PKOl'KKTY

DIGHEM111 SURVEY

OF THE

MOLSON LAKE EAST AND WEST, SHABOTIK RIVER, AND LORNA LAKE AREAS,

ONTARIO

FOR

GEOTEST CORPORATION

BY

DIGHEK LIMITED

TORONTO, ONTARIO JANUARY 31, 198*1

Z, DVORAK VICE-PRESIDENTD,C, FRASER PRESIDENT

K' Jv

SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A total of 464 km of electromagnetic/resistivity/

magnetic/VLF-EM surveys were flown in December 1983, over

four b]Dcks southeast of Hemlo, Ontario.

The surveys outlined several conductors which are

associated with areas of low resistivity and high VLF-EM

activity, and in some cases with correlating magnetic

anomalies. Most of the resistivity, VLF-EM, and magnetic

features are believed to reflect geologic structures of

possible exploration interest. These features, together

with some EM anomalies, may warrant further investigation

using appropriate surface methods and techniques.

AA ZD-187

CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION ....................... . . . . * . . . . . . . . . 1 *

SECTION Is SURVEY RESULTS .............*....*.... I- 1

CONDUCTORS IN THE SURVEY AREA* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I- 1Molson Lake* West .....*................. I- 6Molson Lake , East ...........*.....**.***. I- 7 Not includeShabotik River ...............,........... L- 8 -Lorna Lake ............................... X- 9 "

SECTION IIs BACKGROUND INFORMATION .. . . . . . . . . . . . . XX- 1 Not i m

ELECTROMAGNETICS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . XX- 1 "Geometric interpretation ................. II- 2Discrete conductor analysis .............. II- 2X-type electromagnetic responses ......... 11-10The thickness parameter .................. XI-11Resistivity mapping ...................... 11-12Interpretation in conductive environments. 11-16Reduction of geologic noise............... 11-18EM magnetite mapping ..................... 11-19Recognition of culture ................... 11-21

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETICS .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. 11-24 "

VLF-EM .........;............................. 11-27 "

MAPS ACCOMPANYING THIS REPORT

APPENDICES

A. The Flight Record and Path Recoveryt

B. EH Anomaly List

AA l D-187

. ,

LOCATION MAP66*00'

MOLSON LAKE" AREAS

M

148^5'

66*00'

SCALE 1-250,000

FIGURE KA)THE SURVEY AREAS

LORNA LAKE, MOLSON LAKE WEST, MOLSON LAKE EAST

TNTRODUCTIOH

DIGHEM111 surveys totalling 464 line-km were flown

with 150 m line-spacing for Geotest Corporation, from

December 1 to 3, 1983, in four areas south to southeast of

Hemlo, Ontario (Figure 1).

The Astar CG-NSM turbine helicopter flew at an average

airspeed of 131 km/h with an FM bird height of approximately

39 m. Ancillary equipment consisted of a Sonotek PMH 5010

magnetometer with its bird at an average height of 54 m,

a Sperry radio altimeter, a Geocam sequence camera, an

RMS GR33 analog recorder, a Sonotek SDS 1200 digital data

acquisition system, a DigiData 1640 9-track 800-bpi magnetic

tape recorder, and a Herz Industries Totem-2A VLF-

electromagnetometer with its sensor towed at an average

height of 62 m. The VLF-EM receivers were tuned to NAA.

Cutler, Maine, which operates at 17.8 kHz, and to NLK

Seattle, Washington, which operated at 24.8 kHz. The analog

equipment recorded four channels of EM data at approximately

900 Hz, two channels of EM data at approximately 7,200 Hz,

two ambient EM noise channels (for the coaxial and coplanar

receivers), two channels of magnetics (coarse and fine

count), a channel of radio altitude, and four channels of

VLF-EM (the total field and the quadrature of the vertical

component for tvo stations), The digital equipment recorded

- 2 -

the EM data with a sensitivity of 0.20 ppm at 900 Hz, and

0.40 ppm at 7,200 Hz, the magnetic field to one nT (i.e.,

one gamma), and the VLF-EM field to 0.10 percent.

Appendix A provides details on the data channels, their

respective sensitivities, and the flight path recovery

procedure. Noise levels of less than 2 ,ppm are generally

maintained for wind speeds up to 35 km/h. Higher winds

may cause the system to be grounded because excessive

bird swinging produces difficulties in flying the

helicopter. The swinging results from the 5 m2 of area

which is presented by the bird to broadside gusts, The

DIGHEM system nevertheless can be flown under wind

conditions that seriously degrade other AEM systems.

It should be noted that the anomalies shown on the

electromagnetic anomaly map are based on a near-vertical,

half plane model. This model best reflects "discrete"

bedrock conductors. wide bedrock conductors or flat-lying

conductive units, whether from surficial or bedrock sources,

may give rise to very broad anomalous responses on the EM

profiles. These may not appear on the electromagnetic

anomaly map if they have a regional character rather than a

locally anomalous character. These broad condu tors, which

more closely approximate a half space *odel, will be maximum

- 3 -

coupled to the horizontal (coplanar) coil-pair and are

clearly evident on the resistivity map. The resistivity

map, therefore , may bf. more valuable than the electro

magnetic anomaly map, in areas where broad or flat-lying

conductors are considered to be of importance.

In areas where magnetite causes the inphase components

to become negative, the apparent conductance and depth of EM

anomalies may be unreliable.

Areas where EM responses are evident only on the

quadrature components, indicate zones of poor conductivity.

Where these responses are coincident with strong magnetic

anomalies, it is possible that the inphase component

amplitudes have been suppressed by the effects

of magnetite. Most of these poorly-conductive magnetic

features give rise to resistivity anomalies which are

only slightly below background. These weak features are

evident on the resistivity map but may not be shown on

the electromagnetic anomaly nap. If it H expected that

poorly-conductive sulphides may be associated with

magnetite-rich units, some cf these weakly anomalous

features may be of interest.

AA 2D-187

- 1-1 -

SECTION.Is SURVEY RESULTS4

CONDUCTORS IK THE SURVEY AREA

The survey covered four grids with 464 km of flying,

the results of which are shown on four separate map sheets.

Tables 1-1 to 1-4 summarize the EH responses on the four

sheets with respect to conductance grade and interpretation.

The line spacing, line direction, and distances flown

over the four areas are shown below:

Area

Molson Lake, West

Molson Lake, East

Shabotik RiverLorna Lake

Line No.

1-23

101-112

201-236301-327

Line Spacing

150 m150 m

150 m150 m

Line Direction

N-SN-S

N-S

N-S

TOTAL

km

68

28

273

75

464

The electronagnetic anomaly maps show the anomaly

locations with the interpreted conductor shape, dip,

conductance and depth being indicated by symbols. Direct

magnetic correlation is also shown if it exists. The strike

direction and length of the conductors are indicated when

anomalies can be correlated from line to line* When

- 1-2 -

TABLE 1-1

196 MOLSON LAKE WEST

CONDUCTOR GRADE

65432 1 X

TOTAL

CONDUCTANCE RANGE

> 99 MHOS50-99 MHOS20-49 MHOS10-19 MHOS5- 9 MHOS< S MHOS

INDETERMINATE

NUMBER OP RESPONSES

O O O O 2

35 8

45

CONDUCTOR MODEL

B S H E

TOTAL

MOST LIKELY SOURCE

DISCRETE BEDROCK CONDUCTOR CONDUCTIVE COVER ROCK UNIT OR THICK COVER EDGE OP HIDE CONDUCTOR

NUMBER OP RESPONSES

82610

1

45

(SEE EM MAP LEGEND FOR EXPLANATIONS)

- 1-6 -

studying the map sheets for fol.Xow-up planning* consult the

anomaly listings appended to this report to ensure that none

of the conductors are overlooked.

Molson Lake, West

The resistivity of the geologic environment in the

Molson Lake, West area varies from less than 250 ohm-m to in

excess of 8,000 ohm-m. Zones of low resistivity correlate

will with lakes and low lying, presumably wet or swampy,

grour.d. In contrast, the higher ground appears to be highly

resistive.

The VLF-EM map shows a number of narrow trends whose

primary strike is close to northwest, and the secondary

strike direction is approximately northeast. A close

correlation exists between the VLF-EM and resistivity

patterns. It is believed that the VLF-EM anomalies reflect

structural features, such as faults, as well as near-surface

conductive features, such as conductive lake-bottom

sediments.

The total magnetic field -map is relatively active*

being dominated by a prominent narrow trend of a north

westerly direction. The enhanced magnetic map shows that

parallel, much weaker trends occur north and south of this

main feature* Possible northeasterly-striking features of

- 1-7 -

secondary nature are suggested by the enhanced magnetic

patterns. Partial correlation exists between the VLF-EM and

the magnetic trends, further supporting the above suggestion

that they reflect structural features.

The electromagnetic anomalies map contains 46

responses, among which nine reflect conductors of possible

bedrock origin. All of these anomalies are associated with

resistivity and VLF-EM anomalies, but only a few relate to

magnetic features {e.g., 4B, 11A, 20A, and possibly 1001C).

Anomalies 4B, 7B-1001C, 11A, 20A, and 20B-22A are

related to apparent photolineaments, while 2xB appears

unrelated to any obvious feature.

- 1-9 -

NOTE: Pages 1-3, 4,5,9 and 10 of the Dighen report contain

technical information on different properties and this

unrelated data is not included.

APPENDIX A

THE FLIGHT RECORD AND PATH RECOVERY

Both analog and digital flight records were produced.

The analog profiles were recorded on chart paper in the

aircraft during the survey. The digital profiles were

generated later by computer and plotted on electrostatic

chart paper at a scale of 1:15,000. The digital profiles

are listed in Table A-1.

In Table A-1, the log resistivity scale of 0.03

decade/mm means that the resistivity changes by an order

of magnitude in 33 mm. The resistivities at O, 33, 67, 100

and 133 mm up from the bottom of the digital flight record

are respectively 1, 10, 100, 1,000 and 10,000 ohm-m.

The fiducial marks on the flight records represent

points on the ground which were recovered from camera film.

Continuous photographic coverage allowed accurate photo-path

recovery locations for the fiducials, which were then

plotted on the geophysical maps to provide the treck of the

aircraft. . '

The fiducial locations on both the flight records and

tlight path maps were examined by a computer for unusual

helicopter speed changes* Such speed changes may denote

- A-2 -

an error in flight path recovery. The resulting flight path

locations therefore reflect a more stringent checking than

is provided by standard flight path recovery techniques.

Table A-1. The Digital Profiles

ChannelName (Freq)

HAGALTCXI (900 Hi)CXQ (900 Hz)CXS (900 Hz)CPI (900 Hz)CPQ (900 Hz)CPS (900 Hz)CPI (7200 Hz)CPQ (7200 Hz)VLFTVLFQVT2VQ2

Din (900 HZ)DIFQ (900 Hz)REC1RJEC2REG 3

REC4COTRES (900 Kx)RES (7200 Hz)DP (900 Hz)DP (7200 Hi)FEOt (900 Hz)'

Observed parameters

magneticsbird heightvertical coaxial coil-pair Inphasevertical coaxial coil-pair quadratureambient noise monitor (coaxial receiver)horizontal coplanar coil-pair inphasehorizontal coplanar coil-pair quadratureambient noise monitor (coplanar receiver)horizontal coplanar coil-pair inphasehorizontal coplanar coil-pair quadratureVLP-EM total field (Primary station)VLP-EM vertical quadrature (Primary station)VLF-EM total field (Secondary station)VLF-EM vertical quadrature (Secondary station)

Computed Parameters

difference function inphase from CXI and CPIdifference function quadrature from CXQ and CPQfirst anomaly recognition functionsecond anomaly recognition functionthird anomaly recognition functionfourth anomaly recognition functionconductancelog resistivitylog resistivityapparent depth ppartnt depthapparent weight percent magnetite

Scaleunits/mm

10 nT3 m

PPI*ppmppnppmppmppmppmppm%\\\

ppmppmppmppmppnppngrade

.03 decade

.03 decade3 m3 B0.2SI

10-1 U/t/14

APPENDIX B

EM ANOMALY LIST

s^v;-^l^**Wfe^

196 MOLSON LAKE WEST

COAXIAL COPLANAR COPLANAR . VERTICAL . HORIZONTAL CONOUCTXVB 900 BS 900 m 7200 DI . DIKB . SHEET EARTH

* *

ANOMALY/ REAL QUAD REAL QUAD REAL QUAD . CON D DEPTH*. COND DEPTH RESIS DEPTH FID/INTERP PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM . MHOS M . MHOS M OHM-M M

LINE 3 A 810 S

LINE 4 B 754 B?

LINE 6 A 601 S B 616 S C 625 S

LINE 7 A 569 H B 540 B?

LINE B A 443 S B 481 B?

LINE 9 A 429 H

LINE 1001 A 319 S? B 324 S? C 337 B?

LINE 11 A 1384 B?

LINE 12 A 1219 S B 1208 S C 1203 S D 1198 H

LIKE 13 A 1219 S

LINE 14 A 1208 S B 1203 S

(FLIGHT 1 0

(FLIGHT 1 1

(FLIGHT 0 1 1 1 1 1

(FLIGHT 0 1 1 2

(FLIGHT 1 5 0 1

(FLIGHT 1 1

(FLIGHT 0 1 0 1 0 1

(FLIGHT 1 0

(FLIGHT 0 IS 1 2 0 1 0 6

(FLIGHT 0 16

(FLIGHT 1 2 0 1

2) 0

2) 1

2) 0 1 0

2) 0 0

2) 0 0

2) 1

2) 0 0 0

D 0

D 010 0

1)0

1) 10

0

0

2 2 2

1 3

12 1

3

2 30

0

32 42

13

33

42

4

5

424

6 11

42e

9

67 4

2

82 7 5

33

86

9 6

*

2 .

*

1 .

*

24 . 22 . 20 .

*

*

22 . 24 .

*

78 . 11 .

*

*

23 .*

t

15 . 23 . 3 .

*

ft

0 .*

203 . 34 .17 . 92 .

204 .

*

34 . 17 .

66 .

66 .

O . O . O .

O . O .

O . O .

O .

2O

60 .

O , O . O . O .

O .

o .2 .

1 198 233

28 226514 438626 2274

40 127144 692

24 253190 1035

36 923

51 116236 1285102 1047

174 1599

16 18924 136227 184625 373

17 171

28 107033 1443

,* ESTIKATBD DEPTH HAY BE UNRELIABLE BECAUSE THE STRONGER PART .. OP THE CONDUCTOR KAY BE DEEPER OR TO ONE SIDE OP TUB FLIGHT ., LINE, OR BECAUSE OP A SHALLOW DIP OR OVERBURDEN EFFECTS. .

160

187 115 158

O O O

311

3O

12O

54

97

oO O 2

O O

196 MOLSON LAKE WEST

COAXIAL COPLANAR COPLANAR 900 HZ 900 m 7200 HI

ANOMALY/ REAL QUAD REAL QUAD REAL QUAD FID/INTER* PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM

VERTICAL . HORIZONTAL CONDUCTIVE DIKE . SHEET EARTH

*COND DEPTH*. COKD DEPTH RESIS DEPTH MHOS M . MHOS M OHM-M M

LINE 14C 1198 HE 1182 S

LINE 15A 1098 H

LINE 16A 1077 SB 1069 H

LINE 17B 962 SC 1002 S

LIME 18A 946 S?B 941 SC 930 HD 90S S

LINE 19A 83) H

LINE 20A 812 B?B 778 B?

LINE 21B 739 S?

LINE 22A 693 B7

(FLIGHT0 60 0

(FLIGHT1 4

(FLIGHT0 00 0

(PLIGHT0 10 0

(FLIGHT0 00 10 10 1

(FLIGHT0 2

(FLIGHT1 21 0

(FLIGHT1 0

(FLIGHT2 0

D01

D1

1)00

1)00

1)0000

1)0

1)00

1)1

1)1

130

8

10

01

1201

5

20

0

1

343

23

40

43

4405

9

74

3

S

*

53 !5 .

*

56 .*

m

8 .11 .

t

3 .7 .

t

*

B .19 .5 .

19 .*

33 .m

19 .1 .

*

9 .

*

3 .

11

1

11

11

1111

1

14

1

1

*

3 !9 .

*

9

0 .

9

22 .4 .

m

47 .14 .

m

29 .0 .0 .0 .

,0 .

m

3 .71 .

9

1 .t

49 .

11

1

11

11

1111

1

11

1

1

2463

29

8457

18993

1113311528

143

58203

69

177

3657169

443

24436169

2041623

1225260682802606

1035

900249

3943

201

20

3

300

15341

62000

0

21164

2

142

.' ESTIMATED DEPTH MAY BE UNRELIABLE BECAUSE THE STRONGER PART .

. OF THE CONDUCTOR HAY BE DEEPER OR TO ONE Sluo OF THE FLIGHT .

. LINE, OR BECAUSE OF A SHALLOW DIP OR OVERBURDEN EFFECTS,

* These anomalies occur within the boundaries of the Coronation property,

43CI2NW0083 43CiaNWe84a MOLSON LAKE 900

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

gMsu. o

Type of Sur Township o

Claim Hold(

Survey Com Author of R

Address of i Covering Da

Total Miles

, j AIRBORNE ELECTROMAGNETIC, VLF, MAGNETIC

r Area MQLSON LAKE AREA G603

. , j 554588 ONTARIO LIMITED

GEOTEST CORPORATION

,pnr, JENS E. HANSEN

\iithor 1 9 Nesbitt Street, Nepean, Ont . K2H 8C4,PcnfS,,rvry December 1 - 10, 1983

(linecutting to office)

of Line C.ut

SPECIAL PROVISIONS DAYS CREDITS REQUESTED r..,^...;,,, P*""-

ENTER 4 1 line cuttii

survey.ENTER 2 additiona same grid

A1RBORNI MagnetoiiiC

VLF

DATF,: Feb

Res. Geol.

— F.lpi-trnmagnrtir0 days (includes 1g ) for first Magnetometer ————————

— Radiomrtrir. ...

0 days for each -Other1 survey using r.^lngir*!

Gfnohfmiral.. ,.,.,,,,,

l CREDITS (Special provuion credit! do not apply to airborne lurveyi)

•rr 20 Rlrrtrnmapnrtic 20 RnHimprfrir. n ( 'mer dayt per claim) ^^/^ ^^^

Sj^ d&Zr ^*-^flruary 22, 1984mNATIlRF;X\.X^5^t^*f 'r'^ x^ X

f * fttfte* fi'^HSRSti^*"11 /"

0 ^ ^~ '^ s~~OualifirationK J* O O ti ̂ -*

Previous SurveysFile No.

:::::

Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

SSM668874gcgJjKelix) (number)

668876

668877

668878

668879

668880

668881

668882

668883

668884

668885

lii| ipni* 'luaoijjnnn aawJi jj

83* (8/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale____

.Number of Readings .

.Line spacing ————

Contour interval.

InstrumentAccuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ———

O

p:b

Coil separation

Accur;fv .

Method:

Frequency

O Fixed transmitter D Shoot back O In line O Parallel line

1(-pecify V.L.F. station)

Parameters measured.

Instrument.Scale constant

Corrections made.

O Base station value and location .

Elevation accuracy.

InstrumentMethod D Time Domain D Frequency Domain

INDUCED POLARIZATIO

Paiame ters — On timeVH -. Off tjrp*.H *2 — Delay timr .

|J5 - Integration time. ,,,.,. .-,t^(^ Pnwff .tt!

Electrode array . ...-

I'.lcctrodr spacingTVDC of electrode ..,, ,,...,—. ————————————

Frequency . ,

Range

1

SELF POTENTIALInstrument.Survey Method.

Corrections made.

RADIOMETRICInstrument.Values measured .

Energy windows (levels).

Height of instrument ——

Size of detector————

Overburden —-—————

Range.

.Background Count.

(type, depth - include outcrop map)

ERs (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey————————————————————————— Instrument —————————————————————————— Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYSType of cn™-y(*) D IGHEM m' m * MAGNETICS. VLF EMInstrument(slHERTZ TOTEM 2A VLF-EM. PIGHEM III INPHASE-OUADRATURE EM. PROTON PRECRSSTfiN

Cutler - 17.8 kHz (ipccify for each type of turvey) inphase 0.2 ppm Magnetics 80SOTEK VLF Seattle - 24.8 kHz . Total field 0.1X Vertical Quadrature 0.1* MAfl l Nt

(ipecify for each type of survey) Quadrature 0.2 ppm

Aircraft used Helicopter Alouette II __________________________________________

Sensor altitude — ?6 metres ———————————————————————————————————————————————Navigation and flight path recovery method Mosaic^ - ath

Recovery using tracking film compared to mosaics.Aircraft altitnHo 51 metres .Line Sparing ISO metres

Miles flown over total area. 75 .Over claims only 75

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken...

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection—————————

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain—————————

Drainage Development____________ Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, aihing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.

GcncraL

ANALYTICAL METHODS

V;..ucs expressed in: per centp.p. m. p. p. b.

D D D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circlc)

Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method-Reagents Used—————

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -———--————.Extraction Method. Analytical Method. Reagents Used ——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory^— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used————

General -

.tests)

.testsL

-tests)

Ministry o(NaturalResource*

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

Instructions: - Please lype or print,

Type of SurveyU)The Mining Act

- If number of mining clatms traveried exceeds ipace on thii form, attach a lilt.

Note: - Only dayt credit! calculated In the "Expenditures" lection may be anteied in the "Expend. Dayi Cr." columni.

- Do not ute shaded areal below.Township or Art*

Add

urvey Company

Name and Addreti of Author (of Qeo-Techmcal report)

~JDete~of Yurvey (from Si to) JTotel "Milei of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Proviiiont

For first survey:Enter 40 dayt. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional turvey: using the leme grid:

Enter 30 days (for each)

Man Dayi

Complete reverse tide and enter (otal(t) here

Airborne Creditl

Note: Special provisionscredit! do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Elect'Omaenetlc

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochomicel

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

' Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geologicel

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Dayt per Claim

—————

—————

Dayi per Claim

Dayi per Claim

t/0

to

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List In numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

Performed on Oaim(t)

Calculation of Expenditure Oayi C'editi

Total Expenditurei

S -i- 15

Totel Dayi C'editi

V

Initructiont Total Dayi C'editi may be apportioned at the claim holder 'i choice. Enter number of da y i credits per claim itiected In column* at right.

Date27- s - e*Certification Verifying RejwnofWprk

Total numb t r of mining claims covt'td by thii report of work.

1 hereby certify that 1 have a penonal and intimate knowledge of the faclt tet forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or tvitnetsed tame during and/or after Iu completion and the annexed repon it true.

Name end Poital Addrau of Patton Certifying

e. //igy f/Data Certified27 ~ /-

w it 1/9)

© Ministry of Technical Assessr ; 'Natural #2:2 X ' I.; ' i - ~ - ̂ ..--V , - : .

Resources Work Credit*r Ontario ^;.

i.ilk**.

Mw?

m w-

•"-:-- ; ..'.. : -,'-^-."'-. :;v'"-': ':.v^?r.j";'^-^w^?~^r^^^^P^^- - ' '-~ ' '"-"' :' '- ' ""•"•' -" ""'•''"'-v' -'''-"- '^-- '''" ' '"' •9 :F'lv^'5lJ'i:t^w'

D*U j, , Mtnfno B*cordf{ls Rfport of1984 06 28 N0**0- W-84- f

•- - , - ''' ' ' V - - '.'

Recorded Holder554588 ONTARIO LIMITED

Township or AreaMOLSON LAKE AREA

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

35

35

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Cltlmi AMtixd" column

f?eo'A9'0*l day t

Man days Q Airborne GO

Special provision O Ground Q

O Credits have been reduced because o) partial coverage of claims.

PH Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant

Mining CWm AtMSMd

SSM 668874 to 885 Inclusive

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

•vv'-i^

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims - - -- :~'^

•;' G not sufficiently covered by th* survey LJ Insufficient technical d*u filed v , ' '. "-' - : -y?sjYy,;.', 1 ... - ... ' -- - " •••'•.' . ' ' ''' - ' ' ' -''. ' . ' - V-'". " ~-'::-??fe'C^'; :' ' : ' r- -.••..'•' : - ••^•:: . ''.' •'••-.-•;' ';' : . . •' : '"' l,-. . : ;" ;-;fei;^R

p'-:?*'—. '-, ' V i" ; " r'^'''iv"i' '.^': . ''O-^V." " ' ' ' .-.' " 'v'";/' ^^.^"";.N'^i'kV:^;Stiv"^i- ' ' "' - ' -' . '-'V ..-'•'l ". '. "; ' - ', . ' ' , " ;', r 1 " ' H. ' - . ' ' ' ' ' ' - , 'i"'1 J'iV ,' - , '-.''. -: ".'' ' ' , '"^-^' - \~*^r'Qdjf-''pV* '

fJ:

'-V

t

1•^?

v ;

jii

&S

Your File: 25-84 Our File: 2.6188

1984 03 19

Mrs. M.V. St. JulesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources875 Queen Street EastP.O. Box 669 -.Sault Ste. Marie* OntarioP6A 6N2 :-1 ;•; t .

Dear Badam: .-;-1 ;

We have received reports and maps for an Airborne Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) survey submitted on mining claims SSM 668874 et al 1n the Area of Molson Lake.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

Yours sincerely,

..i

•'rv-1? . I.,

Iffe^ffel J?.^vY.-;. j I 'ftj.i -

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario ' M7A 1W3 Phone: 416/965-6913

A. Barr:dg "•

cc: 554588 Ontario Limited 188 Kenllworth Ave. Toronto, Ontario

1 M4L 3S6i

cc:. Jens E. Hansen . Box 11385 N Stn. H ' :Nepean, Ontario K2H 7V1 i '5

.Mj^lstryof Natural ; Resources

rio

1984 06 28 Your File: 25-84 Our File: 2.6488

Mrs. M.V. St. OulesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources875 Queen Street East, Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioP6A 5N2

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

rector Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

S. Hurst:mc

Ends.

cc: 554588 Ontario Limited 188 Kenllworth Avenue Toronto, Ontario M4L 3S6

cc: Geotest Corp.Box 11385Station "H"

:; Nepean, Ontario K2H 7V1Attention: Jens E. Hansen

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S. Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario ;

; ̂ liliil845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1984 06 28

2.6488/35-84

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The On'^rio Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits thut you expected and ?lso that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authored to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the recoid sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief fiom the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may bedisregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may. within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and e new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

n*y..•,'^V

1984 07 16 Your F11ei 25-84 Our Flit! 2.6488

Mrs. M.V. St. Oule*Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources675 Queen Street Cast, Box 669Sault Ste. Marie, OnUrloP6A IH2

Dear Madam

RE! Notice of Intent dated June 28, 1984 Airborne Geophysical (Electromagnetic and Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claim SSM 668874 et al In the Area of Molson Like

The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OnUrloM7A 1W3Phone!(416)965-4888

S. Hurtttne

cc! 554588 Ontario Limited 188 Ken1)worth Avenue Toronto, Ontario M4L 3S6

ccl Geotest Corporation Box 1138? Station 'H* Nepean, Ontario K2H 7V1Attentloni Jens E. Hansen

ccl Mr* 8.H. FergusonMining l Lands Comlsstoner Toronto, C*t*rio

cc! Resident GeologistSault Ste. Marie, OnUrlo

Ministryof GeotechnicalReport

Ontario Ml Approval

Mining Lands Comments

o: Geophysics

Commant*

} Approved Q With lo tte again with corractiont

DTo: Geology - Expenditures

Commantt

) Approved f] Wlih to x* again with corractiontSlgoatufa

DTo: Geochemistry

Comment i

(~) Approved (~1 With to M* *B*ln with corrtcttontSi0n*tur*

[~~|TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney tflock. {Tel: 5-1380)

1893(81/10)

m rnH o 73 :b

CK

O

7) u -\ o ^ r

t '-*"' .-^'.'*#'ViC^?~'•"•'.i*y#y,. f - -' ' ' .'-(TfH^WAV' in f i. f ,

LOCATION MAP

Ml

860OO'

48045'

DIGHEM SURVEYMOLSON LAKE WEST AREA, ONTARIO

Flight Line

SCALE 1-250,000

18

-Fiducial 2120 (Not recovered I rom film)-Fiducial 2 118 (Recovered f rom (Mm)

TOTAL FIELD MAGNETICS

FOR

GEOTEST CORPORATION

CM

301 A

Fiducial 2110 (Not recovered I rom film)

Hducial 2104 (Recovered from f ilm)

Line number and Flight direction

Scale 1:15,0001/2

F-TT"T":T

f^-. r1/4

1 1 2 Kilometres. ^- i

O 1/4 1/2 3/4 Miles

A

ISOMAGNETIC LINES(total field)

-1000——-"* 1 000 nT

-100——"" 100 nT

- 20 ——-^ 20 nT

-—— --~' 10 nT

magnetic depression

Magnetic Inclination within the survey area: 76'

210 CORONATION RESOURCES LTD PROPERTY JOB 1 96

DATE JANUARY/84

DRAWN BY

?w\CHECKED BY ^

-2, (26^0-7

la regsr1^ y?••^rk'^ ** -ti

LOCATION MAP

86 DOO

B6000

SCALE 1-250,000

220

DIGHEM E SURVEYMOLSON LAKE WEST AREA, ONTARIO

FILTERED TOTAL VLF EM FIELDFlight Line

Fiducial 2120 (Not ^covered from film) Fiducial 2118 (Recovered from dim}

FOR

GEOTEST CORPORATIONFiducial 211C (Not recovered from film)

2104 (Recovered from film)

1/2 O

t H~T -^T??rt:'

Scale 1 = 15,0001/2 1 1 2 Kilometres

301 A

Line number and Flight direction 1/4 o 1/4 1/2

-l3/4 Miles

1-*.*^u"* J?--*va

w

2 r-——— -T"

O 8 -

REJECT

ID 10 '.C

CYCH. LS/METRE

f-requency response of

VI F F.M fillet

Tx ; NLK Seattle, Wash,

f - 24.8 kHz

CORONATION RESOURCES LTD PROPERTY 96 JANUARY/84[) \\ A W (Sk H Y Mr- CM t) BY

LOCATION MAP

66000

48Q45 48^5

86000'

DIGHEM" SURVEYMOLSON LAKE WEST AREA, ONTARIO

ENHANCED MAGNETICS

Flight Line

SCALE 1-250,000

— Fiducial 2120 (Not lecovered from film!--Fiducial 2118 (Recovered from film)

FOR

•- Fiducial 2110 (Not recovered from film)

301 A

— Fiducial 2104 (Recovered from film)

Line number and Flight direction

1 2

1 4

Scale 1 = 15,0001/2

..-Jr.".""-.1 1 2 Kilometres

3/4 Miles

230

^Mf/^AJ/AJ^O^ ^4 CORONATION RESOURCES LTD 'PROPERTY

ISOMAGNETIC LINES (enhanced field)

000 nT

000 nT

200 nT

100 nT

depression

"DD

.t: "o.

E

REJECT

10

Cycles/metre

Frequency response o( magnetic operator

MB

196UAU JANUARY 784

DRAWN H Y

L J3v....C H t OK t L) BY -,

-1^. . C^O^KyOL^

LOCATION MAP

^4^:^^,vfM^^::^

;' ; '^ij*r*"^* 4 '

v^^a^i*

86000

*8045

DIGHEM-" SURVEYMOLSON LAKE WEST AREA, ONTARIO

Flight Line

SCALE 11250,000

—— Fiducial 2120 (Not recovered from film)—— F iducial ?i 1H (Recovered from film)

RESISTIVITY

FOR

GEOTEST CORPORATION

301 A

-- Fiducial 2110 (Not recovered from film)

- Fiducial 2104 (Recovered from film)

Line number and Flight direction

T IOr-4-

Scale 1=15,0001/2 1•A 1 1 y 2 Kilometres

LEGEND

Contours in ohm — m at ten intervals per decade

•1000-

800

600

500

400

300

250

200

150

Note

The numbers face in the direction of increasing value.

1/4 o 1/4 1/2 3/4 Miles

CORONATION RESOURCES LTD PROPERTY)HH

l 96[tATf:

JANUARY/84DRAWN H\ i;HE(,KEO BY -,

^-Qt^s^