work integrated learning in science for the 21st century...• structured, critically reflective,...

53
Janice Orrell Professor Higher Education & Assessment Flinders University College of Education, Psychology and Social Work Work Integrated Learning in Science for the 21 st Century

Upload: others

Post on 20-Jul-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Janice OrrellProfessor Higher Education & AssessmentFlinders UniversityCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work

    Work Integrated Learning in Science for the 21st Century

  • Questions• What contributes to effective WIL?• Why include WIL in your program?• Is teaching and learning different in WIL?• What options and models are there for

    Science?• How do we engage with industry in ways that

    make it worthwhile for student learning?

  • A review of the 40 ALTC funded projects identified that there are essential institutional, educationaland partnership elements to attend to in order for Work Integrated Learning (WIL) to be successful.

  • • Clearly articulated, shared vision of WIL within the university, including a shared understanding of its purposes and expectations

    • Realistic recognition of WIL in institutional systems and infrastructure together with the provision of adequate resources

    • Recognition and legitimation within disciplinary communities of the practice-generated knowledge, and the distinctive and complementary roles the university and workplace have in shaping and supporting the learning

    • Engaging and utilising existing institutionally-provided enabling services such as careers services in the WIL process.

    Institutional Elements

  • • Specified learning outcomes• Prior preparation of students• Structured, critically reflective, self and peer learning

    processes during and after WIL experiences • Element of ‘risk’ contributing to profound learning for

    students (the corollary is the futility of unchallenging placements)• Investment in the development, trialing and up-scaling of

    technology-based tools to provide alternative or supplementary WIL experiences

    Educational Elements

  • • Supervisors familiar with students’ prior university learning• Including all stakeholders in development, innovation and

    communication regarding WIL• Induction/professional development for university and host-

    organisation supervisory staff and development of their leadership capabilities

    • Robust and mature relationships with placement providers (host organisations) underpinned by a commitment to mutual benefit.

    Partnership Elements

  • WIL defined Integration of learning in an academic program of study with practical applications in a workplace setting. At best it is working to learn, not merely learning to work.Experiencing work and workplaces (including cultural, economic, social and political drivers) student learn to• Practice with others • Understand their own capabilities and limitations.• Enhance their employability

  • DIMENSIONS

    DOMAINS

    Leadership & Management

    Education

    Partnerships

    Context

    Purposes

    Institutional Vision

    Inspiring Motivation staff engagement

    Resource and Budget

    Educational objectives

    Graduate attributes

    Professional registration

    Career learning

    Enterprise needs & potential benefits

    Mutual benefits

    Vision integration

    Scope

    Innovation

    Geographical location

    Socio-political-industrial

    Curriculum & pedagogy

    Approval

    Resourcing

    Alignment

    Integration

    Pedagogy

    Reflection

    Engagement

    Integration

    Singletons/Group

    Virtual/real

    Professional

    Service learning

    Legal & Ethical Matters

    Risk analysis & management

    WIL Policy provision

    Accreditation compliance

    Access & equity

    MOU

    Intellectual Property

    Confidentiality

    Accreditation

    High/low risk

    Infrastructure

    Provision

    Systems

    Services

    Sustainability

    Career Development

    Student support services

    Recognition

    University systems & services access

    Supervision

    ICT platforms

    Specialist advisory

    Quality Assurance

    Evaluation

    Audit

    Benchmarking

    Assessment

    Standards

    Access and equity

    Mutual benefit

    Duty of care

    Evidence based

    Research informed

    Student Matters

    Duty of Care

    Communication

    Preparation

    Career learning

    Coaching

    Authenticity

    Networking

    Employability

    Element of risk

    Student numbers

    Diversity

    Staff Matters

    Communication

    Recognition & reward

    Promotion profiles

    Workload calculations

    Induction,

    Professional Development

    Host organisation induction & support

    Communication

    Staff numbers

    Expertise

  • WIL is a strategythat has clear learning intentions that may include enhancing students employability but often has other learning intentions

    Employability is a goal especially in education today. Students develop an awareness of the their own capabilities, dispositions that align with what employers are seeking.

    Differentiating WIL & Employability

  • EmployabilityEmployability is a goal for all university education programsset of achievements – skills, understandings and personal attributes – that make graduates more likely to gain employment and be successful in their chosen occupations, which benefits themselves, the workforce, the community and the economy(Yorke, 2006) Students acquire diverse capabilities at University that often remain tacit.Employability can be enhanced by means other than WILsimulations, course projects, voluntary work, peer support, student leadership and international study exchange programs.

  • Without explicitness …..We are at risk of creating a nation of baristas with double degrees.Universities must change their focus from the production of more and more graduates to a greater concentration on graduate quality.

    (Malcolm King, InDaily, 2010).

  • WIL and Science Graduates?

    Or

  • Scientists at Work

  • Scientists at work!

  • Rarely alone &…Often not in labs

  • Challenging the Terminology of WILWork or practice?I choose Practice

    Learning or Education?I choose Education

    Education for Practice(PBE)

  • Education for Practice

    Education for practice (PBE) refers to grounding education in strategies, content and goals that direct students’ learning towards preparation for practice roles post-graduation.

    (Higgs, Loftus & Trede 2010, p.3)

  • Education for Future Practiceis not a reproduction of today’s professions and occupations for current times and contexts.• It is envisaging the future of practice and education and ask

    how we should educate practitioners for this future.• It requires critical scrutiny of current practices and emerging

    trends in higher education to identify aspects of practice and education that are likely to endure as well as fads and trends that will not be sustained in future higher education.

    (Higgs, Loftus & Trede 2010, p.3)

  • Practice-based Curriculum

    Authentic Context

    Professional Practice

    Professional dispositions

    Knowledge Capabilities & Skills

  • Does

    Shows how

    Knows how

    Knows

    Prof

    essi

    onal

    aut

    hent

    icity

    A model of practice competence

    Miller G E. The assessment of clinical skills/competence/performance.

    Academic Medicine (Supplement) 1990; 65:S63-S7

    Real world practice

    Simulations & demonstrations

    Reports & descriptions

    Tests

  • What does this mean for science education?

    WIL in Science does not have an embedded tradition.

    This is a good thing!

    It provides opportunities for blue sky thinking!

  • Problems with Traditional WIL• Ritualised, involving fordist practices that fail to focus on what

    matters most.

    • Limited by the immediate needs of industries and occupations • Constrained by university regulations, limited conceptions and

    poor resourcing.• Lacks systematic evaluation• Opportunistic partnerships with industries

  • Outside the University• Internships• Clinical Placements• POP-UPs• Service learning

    Inside the University• Working in research

    teams • Solving industry and

    community problems in teams

    • Work in the operations of universities

    Current WIL Options

  • Employability & WIL Inside the University

  • A Forensic Science ExampleFirst year, first term Forensic Science.

  • What did they learn?

    • To be observant• To be systematic in collecting evidence• To be safe and systematic in the laboratory• Basic laboratory skills• The importance of accuracy in recording processes• Collaboration• Developing and delivering a cogent argument

  • Some challenges for you?1. What are the tacit capabilities that students gain in your

    classes? Do they know? How can it be more explicit?2. What evidence do students produce to satisfy you that they

    have attained them?3. How do your assessment tasks support the production of

    evidence of emerging capability?4. Is assessment a one-off event or are key threshold concepts

    for pharmacology shared in your programs and revisited over time to foster development?

  • WIL Outside of the University

  • Distinguishing Features of WIL Outside the University

    Involves partnerships with diverse groups– Employers– Workplace mentors and supervisors– Students– Academic teachers– Higher education managers– Professional bodiesAnd balancing risk and reputation management!

  • Outside WILHas opportunities for all stake holders.

    Students: WIL enables – Learning that is not possible in classrooms– Building professional networks– Clarifying career ambitions– Identifying links between content knowledge and practice– Identification of personal capacities and strengths– Demonstration of their employability to potential

    employers

  • Assessment

    Curriculum Elements

    Workplace Context

    Professional practice

    Professional dispositions

    Knowledge Skills

    WIL Assessment

  • Performance Objectives• Being an astute observer noticing what is important in a real world context.• Transfer and effective application of prior learning and knowledge bases to

    interpret observations. • Utilisation of prior knowledge to make and justify decisions. • Selecting procedures that are appropriate to the context from a range of

    choices and carrying them out. • Reviewing personal choices and actions, and evaluating their appropriateness. • Seeking feedback and advice, and negotiate areas for improvement• Listening actively and changing and adapting plans in order to collaborate and

    cooperate with others.• Meeting contractual obligations, such as report writing, planning and running

    projects, and conducting pieces of research/needs analysis

    32

  • Involves Mature PartnershipsOne of the biggest challenges.Involves leadership at all levels of the institution.

    Three types of partnerships:• Episodic • Aligned• Committed

  • Benefits for industry• Identification of potential suitable future employees • Links with academics that can build a learning culture • Student enthusiasm and new ideas that may lead to

    projects that businesses might not normally pursue • Access to university resources (staff and facilities)• Working relationships that can develop into

    opportunities for cooperation and collaboration on other projects

  • Effective WIL PartnershipsRecognition of needs of all partiesClear agreements between stakeholdersRecognition of mutual benefitShared credit for achievementsIf the benefit fails for any the partnerships cease to be

    effective Balance of potential risks against strategic opportunity

  • Communication & Alignment

    Institutional Leadership

    Academic WIL

    Coordinators &Supervisors

    Host OrganisationLeadership

    Host Organisation Supervisors

    Formal Agreement

    Informal relationships

  • Why would Industry engage in WIL partnerships? (PhillipKPA 2014)

    • A desire to give back to their industry or profession and to meet their corporate responsibilities;

    • To improve their corporate image; • To advance their businesses by being better able to

    recruit graduates in the future• To gain access to new thinking and ideas based on

    emerging research gained through deeper ties with universities.

  • Dedicated university & faculty resources Experience with industrial placements Good preparation and realistic expectations Enthusiasm from studentsGuidance for industry supervisors Clear lines of communication between employer, student and university coordinator

    Resource intensiveness Students having to find suitable placements Economic downturn has limited the number of organisations willing to offer paid placements Financial cost to host organisation Can have high risks

    Enablers and Impediments to University Industry partnerships

  • Collaborations with Industry Challenge: getting the BALANCE

    right!

    Theory & PracticeRewards & ResponsibilityLearning & WorkingLeading & Collaborating

  • Natural Partnerships

    Partnerships and progress are difficult to achieve when the balance isn’t right!

  • WIL PartnershipsStakeholder approachAuthentic & transformative Theory & practice are parts of a

    wholeFluid synergy where each partner

    counter-balances the other Commitment to mutual benefitRecognition of mutual benefitChanges of each reshapes the otherBalance of potential risks against

    strategic opportunity and success

  • Looking to the Future

  • Anyone can imitate!

    But will it produce learning that is applicable for the longer term?

    WIL Placements alone is not enough!

  • Education for Future Practice1. Informed engagement of university and HE leaders.2. Investment in committee partnerships with industry. 3. Integration of Practice, Education & Research4. Focus on what and who matters most.5. Greater deliberateness curriculum that foster self

    regulation, communication and transferability6. Thinking outside the usual!7. Consideration of the VUCA economy facing graduates

    Volitile, Uncertain, Complex, Ambiguous!

  • VUCA Economy

  • What are the options?Conservative model

    • Driver is student accreditation and certification

    • One on one placement (discipline/professional)

    • Institutions & departments vie for placements

    • Individual zoo staff take on a ‘shadow’ or apprentice & allocate tasks (Value added)

    • Relationship is episodic ( length of student placement)

    Enterprise model

    • A shared vision drives the development of a detailed plan addressing the zoo’s needs

    • Plan is broader than student placement• Students recruited into multi-disciplinary teams.• Inducted into a problem/project based learning

    group & share their diverse disciplinary backgrounds

    • Negotiated plan of action• On-going transitional arrangements and

    evaluation.• A Committed, sustained and aligned

    relationship.

  • Enterprise Programs• The starting point is the establishment of a reciprocal, relationship with

    an external enterprise (Trust). • Driver is a concern for, and adaptation to the external partners needs,

    not merely as a resource to meet the student learning experience (Adaptation and flexibility).

    • Development of a shared vision that produces a program that represents an integration of the industry needs for development and the university need to provide a curriculum that encompasses education for practice that utilizes work place environments (Reciprocity).

    • Preserve the relationship with integrated review processes. (Evaluation).

  • Inter-professional EducationWhy consider it?To reflect the multi-dimensional practice and concerns of

    industry partners.To increase the authenticity of the student experience.To increase students’ experiences of contestability of the silo-

    like character of their discipline-based learning.To provide an alternative to the apprentice/mentor model that

    is more likely to re-enforce practice making practice (Britzman 2003).

  • Example….. A City Zoo Strategic development encompasses:• Business plans & Marketing• OHS• International relations and agreements• Research in science and conservation• Education: CPD, Community Education, School-based

    education and postgraduate education• Environment and conservation• Tourism• Veterinary servicesTo name just some….

  • Is this new?• An emerging body of research and pilot initiatives• Some IPE trials, especially in the health and social welfare sectors.• Dedicated Education units in health care• Service learning partnerships in the health sector in USA• Universities and Built Environment Faculties have established MOU-

    based partnerships with city planners and developers.• BUT it is questionable regarding the extent that these successfully:

    – Begin with the enterprise interest – Engage external partners in internal planning and negotiations– Power relationships are more evenly distributed– Have on-going, transition arrangements

  • Potential Benefits• Healthier, more comprehensive, authentic and equal relationships

    between universities and their communities and partner industries• Increased trust and confidence between Universities and their

    enterprise partners• Break down of unhelpful disciplinary silos in universities and

    relationships with industry enterprises• Break down of unhelpful disciplinary silos in students’ personal

    conceptions of the utility, relatedness and relevance of their disciplinary learning

    • Increased opportunities for student engagement with enterprise based understanding and practice (economic, political, social, global)

  • Challenges• Defensiveness and resistance within academic

    silos• Professional accreditation and certification

    regulations• Explicit and shared conceptions regarding the

    need to have curriculum sanctioned learning experiences in communities and workplaces

    • Absence of informed university leadership

  • Wise WIL for Future Practice• Has sponsorship of university leadership with a vision for the future• Has a visible place in institutional infrastructure, policy and planning • Based on a core philosophical, educational, legal and ethical values that are

    common to all programmes in the institution• Encompasses integration of work and learning and integration of WIL

    experience within the broader curriculum• Practice is a core feature of the learning, but not at the expense of theory and

    research-generated evidence• Assessment is an important factor as it defines practice• Assessment of students learning achievements is informed by multiple

    stakeholders but is ultimately a university responsibility • Grounded in authentic partnerships and reciprocal engagement of the

    university with related industries, professions and communities

    Slide Number 1QuestionsSlide Number 3Slide Number 4Slide Number 5Slide Number 6WIL defined �Slide Number 8Differentiating WIL & EmployabilityEmployabilityWithout explicitness …..WIL and Science Graduates?Scientists at Work��Scientists at work!Rarely alone &…Often not in labsChallenging the Terminology of WILEducation for PracticeEducation for Future Practice Practice-based CurriculumSlide Number 20What does this mean for science education?�Problems with Traditional WILCurrent WIL OptionsSlide Number 24A Forensic Science ExampleWhat did they learn?Some challenges for you?Slide Number 28Distinguishing Features of WIL Outside the UniversityOutside WIL�Has opportunities for all stake holders.� AssessmentPerformance ObjectivesInvolves Mature PartnershipsBenefits for industry�Effective WIL PartnershipsCommunication & AlignmentWhy would Industry engage in WIL partnerships? (PhillipKPA 2014) � ��Enablers and Impediments to University Industry partnershipsCollaborations with Industry Natural Partnerships WIL PartnershipsLooking to the FutureWIL Placements alone is not enough!Education for Future PracticeVUCA EconomyWhat are the options?Enterprise ProgramsInter-professional EducationExample….. A City Zoo Is this new?Potential BenefitsChallengesWise WIL for Future Practice�