with special emphasis on adaptation to climate change · world forest week at fao, rome forest...
TRANSCRIPT
Peter Spathelf, Andreas Bolte
Peter Spathelf
Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Germany
World Forest Week at FAO, RomeFOREST EUROPE side eventJuly 19, 2016
Protection of forests in a changing environment – with special emphasis on adaptation to climate change
Photo: P. Spathelf
Peter Spathelf
Expected increase of stressors worldwide
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 2
Increasing stressors and disturbances worldwide
• Precipitation extremes (drought, flooding)
• Forest fire
• Invasive species and damaging agents
• Degradation and deforestation
• Acidification
Source: Trumbore et al., 2015
Peter Spathelf
Increase of forest damages (Europe)
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 3
Photo: P. Spathelf
Source: Nabuurs et al., 2013
Sensitivity ↗ Vulnerability ↗ ?
Peter Spathelf
Strategies to cope with climate change
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAO page 4
Adaptive capacity:
Increase (population, individual)
Source: Nabuurs et al., 2013
Photo: J. Müller, Thünen
Exposure
Avoidance?
Sensitivity:
Increase resistance / resilience
Peter Spathelf
Tree species
selection
preference
Tending / forest
structure change
Soil management
change
Inclusion of risk
management in FM
0
20
40
60
80
100
Resp
on
ses i
n %
Data from COST Echoes: 21 countries involved
Source: Spathelf et al., 2013
Adaptation principles: results of a European survey
19.07.2016page 5
World Forest Week at FAO
Peter Spathelf
Tree species and provenance selection: options
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 6
Non-native tree species?
Doug fir, Grand fir, Western red cedar, …
Mediterranean oaks
Photos: P. Spathelf
Well introduced native tree species?
Climate-resilient tree mixtures
pnV+
New provenances of native tree species?
Western Polish beech prov.
Southeast European oak prov.
Peter Spathelf
Silvicultural systems: function of canopy
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 7
Patch size [ha]
Life span of patches [a]
Patch size [ha]
0.01
0.1
1.0
10
100
1000
50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000
Single-tree selection
Group selection
Uniform
shelterwood
NDBM (Natural disturbance based management)
Important role of canopy: buffering microclimate, and negative impact of wind
Photos: P. Spathelf
Peter Spathelf
Functional elements of the previous stand: stand legacies
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 8
Increase ecological resilience against (biotic) disturbances:
• Habitat trees
• Deadwood (snags, CWD)
• Other disturbance legacies…
Source: Bauhus et al., 2009
Photos: P. Spathelf
Peter Spathelf
Outlook: magnitude of climate change and management options
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAO page 10
Use of Close-to-Nature Silviculture:• Creation of mixed forests, using (long-term) natural regeneration and
planting (climate change specific forest conversion)• Use of whole variety of silvicultural systems (thereby making use of
forest canopy and tending/thinning measures to enhance forest microclimate and soil water availability)
• Maintenance of stand legacies as structural and genetic elements of the previous stand to improve ecological resilience
New approaches:• Planned transfer of species to regions with a matching climate –
extension of a species’ distribution range or use of non-native species (‚Assisted migration‘)
• Use of tree species / provenances with specific adaptive traits (‚Designer forests‘)
Management options
T 1-2 °C
T > 4-6 °C
Magn. of climate change
Peter Spathelf
References
19.07.2016 World Forest Week at FAOpage 11
BAUHUS J, PUETTMANN K, MESSIER C (2009): Silviculture for old-growth attributes. Forest Ecology and Management 258. 525-537.
BRANG P, SPATHELF P, LARSEN JB et al. (2015): Suitability of close-to-nature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry 87 (4). 492-503.
NABUURS GJ, LINDNER M, VERKERK PJ et al. (2013): First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nature Climate Change 3: 792-796.
SPATHELF P, VAN DER MAATEN E, VAN DER MAATEN-THEUNISSEN M, CAMPIOLI M, DOBROWOLSKA D (2014): Climate change impacts in European forests: the expert-views of local observers. Annals of Forest Science 71 (2). 131-137.
TRUMBORE S, BRANDO P, HARTMANN H (2015): Forest health and global change. Science, Vol. 349, Issue 6250, pp. 814-818.
Peter Spathelf, Andreas Bolte
Thank you for your attention!
Photo: P. Spathelf
‚Management for diversity calls for diversity of management‘ Evans & Hibberd, 1990)
Peter Spathelf
Adaptive processes
(1) Long-term evolutionary adaptation
- ability of populations to create new genotypes (of special interest: so-called adaptive traits)
- over one or more generations, due to selection processes (--> genetic variability of populations and reproduction strategies of trees)
(2) Short-term phenotypic plasticity
- due to individual response of plant morphology and/or physiology
Peter Spathelf
II. Mixture regulation in tending
and thinning
Vulnerability assessment
Adaptation strategy
activepassive
Silvicultural options
Measures Technologies, Tools, Models
Legend:
FDT = Forest Development Type
NR = Natural regeneration
succession
I. Change of tree species
composition
Established indigenous tree species
New provenances of established ind.
tree species
New, non-indigenous tree species
Sivicultural systems
(Natural regeneration systems)
(Under)planting or sowing
Dynamic FDT
ClimateSpeciesMatrix (acc. to. Roloff & Grundmann, 2008)
Climate suitability maps
SPATHELF (2016): Final report INKA
BB – in press.
silviculture
Flow chart: active and passive adaptation
Peter Spathelf
MATTHES & VASCONCELOS (2012):
Archiv für Forstwesen und
Landschaftsökologie.
beech
N. spruce
Climate suitability matrix / maps
Peter Spathelf
Primary Focus
Unit of Production
Tree
Ecosystem
Ecological Factors
Stand Structure
Pure, regular
Mixed, irregular
Stand Dynamics
Simple
Complex
Management Factors
Objectives/Issues
Single, discreet
Multiple, integrated
Decision-making
Professionals
Informed public
Source: Wilson 2000
The evolution of silviculturemajor dimensions and trends