wisden india extra issue 5
DESCRIPTION
ÂTRANSCRIPT
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
1
IndIa's summer sojourn
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
-
200 years of Lords
Edited by: Karunya KeshavDesigned by: Ashish Mohanty All pictures published as part of Indias Summer Sojourn courtesy of Getty Images and Wisden India Archive
Contents
IN THE HUNT FOR WIN NO. 4Indias 16 Test tours of England so far have had some thrilling contests - a look at the highs, the lows and the personal bestsSidhanta Patnaik | 24
THE ONE THaT cHaNgED IT allIn 1971, we had the spinners and the tight fielding to support them and, for the first time, we realised we could win abroadAjit Wadekar | 31
a TRaDITION OF WRONg UNsFrom the royal slight in 1936 to the great jelly beans pitch invasion of 2011, Indias England sojourns are speckled with controversiesR Kaushik | 35
NEW scRIpT FOR a NEW gENERaTIONLed by a man not unduly bothered by the history books, a young Indian team has the chance to lay to rest the ghosts of series pastDileep Premachandran | 04
INDIas BEsT aMBassaDORTO ENglaNDIn a traditionally difficult place for Indian cricketers, Dravid has tasted crushing defeat, unexpected success and everything inbetweenAnand Vasu | 08
a TalE OF TWO sERIEsA first-innings total that helps bowlers put pressure on the England line-up is the difference between a series win and a loss, says LaxmanR Kaushik | 12
THE Ball THaT sEaMs, sWINgs aND sINgsMadan Lal and Balwinder Singh Sandhu think the Indian pace attack has what it takes to exploit the English conditionsSaurabh Somani | 16
lEavE a ROOkIE, RETURN a HEROThe greenhorns in the 2014 Indian team to England need only to look to their predecessors for inspirationManoj Narayan | 19
a spEcIal sEaT aT HallOWED gROUNDs Some memories of Lords of cricket traditions and classic contests, unforgiving stewards and forgettable food start from the press box
R Mohan | 40
QUIck sIxIf not a cricketer, what would Cheteshwar Pujara want to be? And what would Varun Aaron like for a last supper? Wisden India wants to know.
11, 21
THE cOlONEl TakEs lORDsI wouldnt trade my three centuries there for anything: Dilip Vengsarkar
Shamya Dasgupta | 43
WIsDEN HONOURs FOR THE lEaDINg lIgHTsThe Wisden Cricketer of the Year award recognises standout performances from the English summer - so far, 17 Indians have made the cut
Sidhanta Patnaik | 46
FIElDs OF glORyA tour of the five stadiums that will host the England-India Tests
22, 23, 38, 39
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
-
4 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
New scriptfor a New geNeratioN
Led by a man not unduLy bothered by the history books, a young indian team has the chance to Lay to rest the ghosts of series past
D i l e e p p r e m a c h a N D r a N
For some, 42 is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything. For Indian cricketers embarking on a tour of England, its an old ghost thats never far from the pavilion. Its presence can be felt each time the team does badly, and even exceptional performances tend to be overlooked as a nations batsmen continue to be judged on the basis of what transpired across 17 overs at Lords 40 years ago.
I was a few days old when it happened, but the
devastation that Geoff Arnold and Chris Old caused on an
overcast morning has been talked about right through my
childhood, adolescence and adult life. Each time India tour
England, we get the references to the Summer of 42 and
also to the scoreboard from Headingley in 1952. Those two
nadirs seem to define the Indian experience in England.
In my lifetime, Ive seen Dilip Vengsarkar bat masterfully
in a summer when most of the locals could barely put bat
to ball (The Colonel takes Lords, pg 43). Ive witnessed
the so-called Golden Generation thrash England in
seamer-friendly conditions at Headingley, and Zaheer
Khan take umbrage at the spilling of some jelly beans to
destroy England at Trent Bridge (A tradition of wrong uns,
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
5
new no. 4 Virat Kohli came of age as a Test player in Australia.
dILEEP PREMACHAndRAn
-
6 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
pg 34). On the last tour in 2011, even as everything that
could possibly go wrong did, Rahul Dravid crafted three
magnificent hundreds. And yet, when India take the field
at Lords on July 9, the whispers about frailty against the
moving ball will be relentless. You have 42 to thank for
that.
Its a good thing that the current Indian team is led by
someone not unduly bothered by the history books. What
Old or Arnold did is of little importance to Mahendra Singh
Dhoni. He doesnt dismiss the archives, but hes always
made it clear that hes not enamoured of them. Whats on
a yellowing page or microfilm isnt going to help his team
win Test matches.
It wasnt always that way. The players of my generation
and those that went before, especially the legends, were
usually in thrall to Lords and its history. When Dravid or
Sourav Ganguly speak of their debuts there in 1996 (Indias
best ambassador to England, pg 8), their eyes reveal the
fulfilment of childhood dreams. For them, and millions of
other colonial kids like myself, making a century or even
playing at HQ was as good as it got.
That is no longer the case. Dhoni has taken a team to the
No. 1 ranking in Test cricket, and won every limited-overs
trophy worth losing sleep over. He isnt going to let his
career be defined by how he does on three tours of England
or a handful of matches at Lords. He wants to win, but he
hasnt gone to England carrying a ton of expectation.
The same is true of most of his teammates. Virat Kohli
is acutely conscious of the fact that he now bats at the No.
4 position where he who many considered God played
for nearly a quarter century. But that isnt going to inhibit
his strokeplay or dictate his body language on the field.
Cheteshwar Pujara (pg 11), while recognising the debt
of gratitude that Indian cricket owes Dravid, has made
it amply clear that he has no interest in being a clone. R
Ashwin doesnt aspire to be Erapalli Prasanna, and Shikhar
Dhawan is no left-handed version of Virender Sehwag.
These men epitomise a new India. They will not be
intimidated or awed by their surroundings. And thats just
as well, given that Indias back catalogue in England five
wins in 52 Tests is not one that inspires great confidence.
We often speak of learning from the past. In this case, the
lessons are almost all cautionary ones and best avoided by
a side that is at its best when fearless.
Until India win a Test in England, the recent struggles
away from home will be referenced at every juncture. Yet,
in what has been a story of overwhelming travel sickness
since 2011, there have been several moments to cherish.
Kohli came of age as a Test player in Australia. Pujara
followed suit in South Africa, and even the defeat to
New Zealand featured crumbs of consolation. For a team
moving on from some of the greatest players to wear the
India cap, victory and defeat are not the only milestones.
The 2011 tour went the way of a fall down a ski slope
midway through the second Test, and while a five-match
series does give a team a chance to claw back the initiative,
it can also lead to total disintegration, as was the case with
These men epitomise a new India. They will not be intimidated or awed by their surroundings. We often speak of learning from the past. In this case, the lessons are almost all cautionary ones and best avoided by a side that is at its best when fearless.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
7
England in Australia last winter.
Indias decision to pick an 18-man
squad raised many an eyebrow,
but it does give more options to
a side that hasnt really had a settled bowling line-up since
Zaheer Khan lost his spark.
There will be intense scrutiny on the batsmen and their
techniques in English conditions, but having acquitted
themselves fairly well in both South Africa and New
Zealand, theyll be confident of taking on an English side
that has slipped several rungs since that halcyon summer
of 2011.
The real concern for India is the bowling (The ball that
seams, swings and sings, pg 16), especially the inability to
maintain consistency over two innings in a Test match.
Mohammed Shami, Varun Aaron (pg 21) and Ishant Sharma
can summon up the pace to trouble top batsmen, while
Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Pankaj Singh are well equipped
to make the most of helpful atmospheric conditions.
Their lack of pedigree could be a blessing as well (Leave
a rookie, return a hero, pg 19). There was clearly an element
of complacency in the way England approached the Tests
against Sri Lanka, and its doubtful whether this Indian
pace sextet will be giving the opposition grey hair in the
run-up to the series. But as Roger Binny, Chetan Sharma
and Madan Lal showed in 1986, reputations mean nothing
if you can find the right line and length. Binny, whose son,
Stuart, could come into the fray at some stage, was a master
at keeping things simple and that should be the primary
focus for Joe Dawes, the bowling coach.
In 2011, this was a series between the side ranked No.
1 and the one eyeing that ranking, with the Lords Test
also the 2000th to be played. With a football World Cup
hogging most of the sporting limelight, there is far less
anticipation about this contest, and that should suit two
teams that have got plenty of issues to address. Both have
gone from summit to foothills inside three years, and a new
generation has the opportunity to script its own stories.
There will be no tickertape parade of the sort that
greeted Ajit Wadekar and his team in 1971 (The one that
changed it all, pg 31) if India do win, but any success will be
of vital importance to a side that is once again stuck with
the label of home-track bullies. Dhoni has often spoken
of his disdain for tags of any sort, but for both him and
his players, this has the potential to be a defining series.
This time, there is no Indian Premier League hangover to
blame, no injury concerns to hide behind and no Tendulkar
hoopla to be distracted by. Three years on from the darkest
days, a young and unscarred side is ready to reach for the
light.
spearhead Ishant Sharma can summon up the pace to trouble top batsmen, but consistency in the bowling attack remains a concern.
dILEEP PREMACHAndRAn
-
8 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
iNDias best ambassaDorto eNglaND
in a traditionaLLy difficuLt pLace for indian cricketers, dravid has tasted crushing defeat, unexpected success and everything in-between
a N a N D V a s U
As the 18 men of the Indian squad to England get ready for their first Test at Trent Bridge from July 9, only three of them having played in the country before, theyll go in to face Stuart Broad, James Anderson and co. armed with the
vast experience and expertise of Rahul Dravid behind them. Dravid joined the coaching staff for a short stint as mentor in the run up to the Tests, and the managements
choice is not hard to fathom. In what is traditionally a difficult place for Indian cricketers, Dravid has tasted
crushing defeat, unexpected success and everything in-between.
Dravid was part of four tours to England. In 1996, he
made his debut in the second Test, which India drew, and
scored 84 and 8 as India drew the third Test in Nottingham,
only to lose the series 0-1. In 2002, he played all four Tests,
scoring three centuries, including a double-hundred at The
Oval. That innings spanned ten-and-a-half hours, took
up 468 balls, and was 163 more than the second highest
score for the innings Sachin Tendulkars 54. During the
same series, Dravid was a key player in the Headingley Test,
putting up a memorable 170-run stand with Sanjay Bangar;
India won that Test to ensure that the series was drawn 1-1.
In 2007, as captain, Dravid went one better, and though
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
9
he did not match his high standards with the bat, India
won 1-0, their first series win in England since 1986. And
then came the final flourish, in 2011, when India lurched
from loss to loss, crashing and burning to a 0-4 thumping
even as Dravid smacked three centuries, aggregating 461
for the series.
That makes his tally in England 1376 runs, with six of
his 36 hundreds coming in the country. And in all this, his
batting average was
an astonishing 68.8,
more than 15 points
clear of his overall
figures. No wonder
then that he simply
loved playing in
England.
Of his 13 Tests in
the country, Dravid
played four Tests at Lords, and
there is little doubt about the place
the worlds most famous cricket
ground occupies in his heart. The
most obvious reason for this is the
sentimental one: Dravids first hit in Test cricket, back in
1996, was at Lords and he came within kissing distance of
making a century, walking after he nicked one from Chris
Lewis, on 95.
Every memory of my debut at Lords is still vivid. There
are a lot of other things that happened since that have gone
a bit fuzzy, but memories of my debut are really vivid,
said Dravid. I still get goose pimples just thinking about
it, walking out for my first bat in Test cricket and doing
so at Lords. Getting the opportunity to start at Lords was
a privilege. I grew up hearing about that ground, reading
about it, my dad had spoken to me about it. He always said,
It would be great if you could play there one day, and for
that to happen in my first Test was incredible.
stompIng grounds Dravids first hit in Tests,
back in 1996, was at Lords, where he came within kissing distance
of a century.
The second-highest impact Indian batsman in England of all time, Rahul Dravid has the lowest failure rate and second-highest pressure impact. But, of his 13 Tests, he has only one series defining (SD) performance the 148 in Leeds in 2002, after which Tendulkar (193) got into the act to take the match away from England. Take into consideration his fielding and captaincy and he becomes the fifth-highest impact Indian player in England.
AnAnd VAsU
-
10 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
Dravid followed that innings with scores of 46, 63,
2, 9, 103* and 36 on the ground, and it was only in 2007,
when India got out of jail as rain and bad light came to
their rescue, that he actually failed at Lords. That jailbreak
was crucial, as it ensured India were alive in the series long
enough to win it later in Nottingham.
It has always been a special place for me. Ive enjoyed
playing there. For a lot of people, they ask what the big
fuss is about. To each his own. I respect that some things
dont connect with some people, said Dravid. Maybe Ive
had success there and that has made me biased. But the
history and tradition behind that ground is undeniable. It
is, in that sense, the home of cricket. Some of the greatest
players you have heard about and read about, walked down
those very steps and made their runs there. Some of your
heroes cherished playing there, and that was important to
me. Every time Ive gone to Lords, Ive enjoyed myself.
Even now, when I go for World Cricket Committee
meetings, or when I took my sons there to walk around and
get a feel for the place, its special. It is one of the biggest
brand names in our great game, and that must count for
something.
While Dravid loves Lords in a special way, his overall
feelings about playing in England are no less affectionate.
A big reason why I loved playing in England for me,
it was always easy to switch off from the cricket there. I
was really relaxed outside of the cricket, and it probably
showed in my performance on the field, he said. The first
thing is that youre not sitting on flights all the time. On
a bus its a lot more relaxed, its a bit of a cocoon and yet
you can actually see the world go by. You see familiar faces
all the time, theres so much to do in London, and were
typically there in the summer when the weather is good.
Theres just so much to see and do. People dont hassle you
if youre walking down the street. That was liberating in its
own way.
This time, given his role on a commentary team and
with the Indian squad, things will be slightly different for
Dravid. Looking at the young team he would be guiding, he
said there have been some positive signs of their ability.
You look at Virat (Kohli), (Cheteshwar) Pujara,
(Ajinkya) Rahane, (Shikhar) Dhawan, theyve all got
The Headingly Test in 2002 was just another Test match for me. I didnt have any specific preparations for it but before the Test, I had batted decently in the warm-up game against Essex.
I was primarily picked as a bowler but had to open the innings to accommodate two spinners.
When (Virender) Sehwag got out early, it was obvious that the wicket was not batting friendly, so Rahul (Dravid) and I assessed the conditions early and played within our limitations. We knew it was a challenge but took on the responsibility to survive the day. Though I got out, it was very
satisfying that I could contribute towards Indias big overseas Test victory. Going into the Test, one
of the most important factors was the way Parthiv (Patel) and Zaheer (Khan) batted out the last 15 overs to save the previous Test at Trent Bridge. That gave us confidence.
Also, during that tour, we had some issues with the BCCI about the contracts and Anil (Kumble) was representing the team, so the victory was crucial in unifying the team. The victory also underlined the bold approach of the Indian team under Sourav Ganguly, where we still made those brave decisions of batting first at a ground like Headingley, still opted to play two spinners on a seaming wicket. It helped improve the image of the Indian team overseas.
SANJAY BANGAR, now Kings XI Punjab coach, made a patient 68 in 236 balls in the third Test at Headingley, Leeds, in 2002. India won by an innings and 46 runs.
As told to Disha Shetty
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
11
hundreds in recent
overseas series.
Theyre all young and
have runs abroad,
thats heartening. Its
early days in their
respective careers,
especially Test
cricket. This tour
will give you a good
read on how far they
may go. The talent and ability to make Test runs overseas
is there. Now they have to be consistent over the course of
a Test and then a series. What you dont want is one big
performance and a lot of 20s and 30s.
You also want batsmen to do well as a group, have big
partnerships, crack games wide open. If batsmen get set,
and can put a big stand together, it generally wins you
games, or at least sets the game up.
As for the bowling, he said, much depends on Ishant
Sharma, who is expected to lead the attack. The bowling
is a bit of a concern from my perspective. I look at various
possible combinations and I wonder how were going to get
20 wickets in a Test. But, that said, its an opportunity for
some of the young guys to step up, especially Ishant, as hes
been around a while now. This tour is a great chance for
him to take things forward, take things to the next level.
From someone who has played as much Test cricket as
Ishant has, you want consistency you dont want the odd
good performance, you want him to carry the attack.
It remains to be seen if any of the youngsters can do a
Dravid. For now though, they get to start off with some
good advice from one of the very best.
If you could play any character from a book, movie or comic, who would it be?
Johnny Depp in Pirates of the Caribbean.
If you could disappear from the limelight for two weeks, where would you go and what would you do?
I like going on holidays. I would love to explore the UK countryside.
A sportsperson from another field whom you admire.
I like Nadal and Djokovic. Nadal is a fighter and the kind of fitness he has is remarkable. I like Djokovics work ethic.
Youre stuck on a desert island, whom would you like for company?
My wife.
What would you have for a last supper?
Home-cooked food, where I get chapati, dal and sabzi just healthy food.
If not a cricketer, then what?
A businessman. Im not sure what business.
Quick Sixc h e t e s h w a r p U j a r a
Farokh Engineer is Indias highest impact wicketkeeper in England till date. Having played in 1967, 1971 and 1974, he was also flexible with his batting position he opened the innings with considerable success too. His 59 and 28 not out, besides his wicketkeeping duties, in the iconic Oval Test of 1971 brought him his SD. He is fourth on the list of highest impact Indian players.
AnAnd VAsU
-
12 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
a tale of two series
a first-innings totaL that heLps bowLers put pressure on the engLand Line-up is the difference between a series win and a Loss, says Laxman
r K a U s h i K
England is one of the few Test-playing countries where VVS Laxman does not have a century, but the batsman from Hyderabad is one of those select few in world cricket who arent judged by numbers alone. In three tours of England between 2002 and 2011, Laxman only made 586 runs at 34.47 with five half-centuries and a best of 74, in his very first Test
in England at Lords in 2002, but he was involved in one drawn (2002), one victorious (2007) and one disastrous (2011) series.
In 2002, India bounced back from a heavy defeat in the
first Test to draw the four-match series 1-1, ending much
the stronger of the two sides by the time the series ended
at The Oval. Five years on, largely untroubled after hanging
on by the skin of their teeth to eke out a draw in the first
Test at Lords, India clinched the three-match series 1-0, the
series win in England coming after 21 years, but everything
went pear-shaped in 2011 when collectively, Indias batting
came a cropper and they were crushed 4-0 in the four-
match showdown.
India havent always possessed the most threatening
bowling unit all-round, so they have had to rely heavily
on their batsmen to create scoreboard pressure. While it
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
13
is true that a team needs to take 20 wickets to win a Test
match more often than not, there are various routes to
taking those 20 wickets. India have generally relied on the
strength of their batting to pick up wickets, twisted as that
might sound.
Whenever we have done well in England, it is on the
back of scoring big runs in the first innings, Laxman told
Wisden India as he reflected in particular on the tours of
2007 and 2011. Its very important to score runs first up,
and thats exactly what happened in 2007, except in the
first Test at Lords when we just about managed to top 200.
Mahendra Singh Dhoni and S Sreesanth, the last-wicket
pair, somehow negotiated the last five overs at Lords as
India escaped with a fortuitous draw in that game, but
from then on, it was India all the way. Both in Nottingham
(which India won by seven wickets)
and at The Oval, we got really big
scores in the first innings (481
and 664 respectively), pointed
out Laxman. And that was a big
reason why we were able to put pressure on the England
batsmen. That, coupled with the fact that our premier fast
bowler (Zaheer Khan) was in excellent form. That is so
important.
Usually, over the years, there has been one bowler who
has had an excellent series whenever we have done well
in England, and that is usually a fast bowler. Because the
conditions there suit seam and swing bowling, if a bowling
unit is in top form and the batsmen are getting big runs,
there is every chance of constantly keeping the opposition
on the back foot. Thats precisely what happened in 2007.
free fall Laxman: In 2011, other
than Rahul Dravid, no batsman was able to convert a start into
something substantial.
R KAUsHIK
-
14 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
By contrast, 2011 was the exact
opposite, with everything that
could go wrong going horribly
wrong. We started off the first
Test at Lords quite well, we picked up two wickets for
nothing but then, our premier fast bowler broke down,
Laxman went on, referring to the hamstring injury that
ended Zaheers tour inside the first session. There was
a lot of inexperience in the fast bowling ranks, so it was
imperative for Zaheer to lead the way and lead from the
front. Him getting injured that early in the tour, it was a big
blow for the team.
Then, in the second Test, we lost our other experienced
bowler Harbhajan Singh, who too was ruled out of the
series. To lose one of them was bad enough; to lose both
our main bowlers was a blow we just couldnt recover from.
Laxman said India had also erred in squad composition
going into the series. We had gone in with a very wrong
combination, just two specialist openers in the squad
which was very surprising, he observed. Usually, you go
with three or sometimes four full-time openers because
playing the new ball is critical in England. When Gautam
(Gambhir) got injured, we had Rahul (Dravid) opening the
batting, which meant the batting order was shuffled a lot.
Because of injuries to batsmen and bowlers, we never had
a settled combination in any Test.
The highlight of our performances in 2002 and 2007
was batsmen going on and getting big scores, be it Viru
(Virender Sehwag) or Sachin (Tendulkar) or Rahul. In 2011,
other than Rahul, no one was able to convert a start into
something substantial, which put a lot of pressure on the
inexperienced bowling line-up.
It didnt help either that Englands batsmen were in top
form, and they were able to not just convert their starts
and make hundreds, but go on to make doubles and even
a triple, almost. In countries like England, South Africa
and Australia, it is very important to win the crunch
moments. We were not able to do so. After losing at Lords,
we bounced back in Nottingham but we lost the initiative.
We had taken the lead and were only three or four down.
India have relied on the strength of their batting to pick up wickets, twisted as that sounds
team effortIn 2007, the bowling unit was in top form and the batsmen were getting big runs, including 664 in the first innings at The Oval.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
15
Had we taken a lead
of 150 or so, we would
have been on top. But
Stuart Broad bowled
well with the second
new ball to keep our
lead down, and we
then allowed them to
score big in the second innings. We had our chances, but
we just were not good enough to handle the pressure time
after time.
Despite possessing a formidable batting line-up, India
had wiped the floor in 2011. This time around, only three
members of the 18-man party have played Test cricket in
England previously, but Laxman saw the team putting
up a spirited fight. The performance of the team in the
Champions Trophy in England last year, that gives me a
lot of encouragement, he remarked. This young batting
line-up is very talented, it has the potential to adapt to
conditions quickly. I know the Champions Trophy was
a shorter format, the 50-over version, but the manner
in which they batted and their approach showed a lot of
promise.
Also, I am very buoyed by the performances of the
batsmen in South Africa and New Zealand. Even though we
lost both series, I was heartened to see the way the batsmen
played. They have shown that they have what it takes to
adapt to overseas conditions quickly. It was unfortunate
that the team lost some close games in South Africa and
New Zealand, the team was in contention to win at least
two out of those four Tests. I am sure the young Indian
batsmen have the talent; temperament and the ability to
remain positive are factors that will determine exactly how
they express that talent.
The most consistent Indian players in England have been Kapil Dev (13 matches), Zaheer Khan (8), Vinoo Mankad (6), Bapu Nadkarni (4) and Mohammad Nissar (4).
QUIZD i l e e p V
1. Which useful lower-order batsman registered Indias first fifty in Test cricket in their first Test match at Lords in 1932?
2. Who replaced the injured Vijay Manjrekar in the 1959 tour squad after completing the Oxford University cricket season, and scored a hundred on debut in the fourth Test at Old Trafford?
3. Which English batsman was dropped from the team after scoring 246 in the first Test at Headingley, Leeds, in 1967, in an innings dismissed as boring by the media and selfish by the selectors?
4. Whose faster ball during the 1971 tour was referred to by his teammates as Mill Reef, after the Derby-winning horse of that season?
5. Indias disastrous 1974 tour came to be known after the number of runs they scored in the second innings of the second Test at Lords. Whats the tour commonly called?
6. For the 1979 tour, India took two wicketkeepers. Name them.
7. What batting record held by Greg Chappell (v New Zealand at Wellington in 1974) was broken in the first Test at Lords in 1990, and by whom?
8. Whose illustrious 66-Test career came to an end in the second Test at Lords in 1996?
9. The 2007 series had only four centuries scored with three from Englands side. Who scored Indias lone hundred?
10. In the first Test in 2011, MS Dhoni, the India captain, had an unusual achievement against his name, a first in 123 Tests and 127 years of Lords existence, infuriating the purists. What was it?
Answers on Page 51
R KAUsHIK
-
16 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
the ball that seams, swiNgs aND siNgs
madan LaL and baLwinder singh sandhu think the indian pace attack has what it takes to expLoit the engLish conditions
s a U r a b h s o m a N i
Seam and swing bowling have been the building blocks of most attacks in Test cricket. Nowhere is this truer than in the United Kingdom, where the pitches, the conditions and the frequently heavy cloud cover produce an environment for pacers to thrive in.
The Twenty20 age has added several bows to the pacers
string with a variety of slower balls, run-up alterations and
bouncers of different speeds, but where variety on demand
is a necessity for the shorter format, the most consistent ally
of the quicker men is still the tried and tested combination
of seam and swing in Test cricket.
Indias last tour to England, in 2011, was one where a
Murphys Law nightmare was lived out in full public view.
But before that, they had good outings in 2002 and 2007,
with a draw and a win to show for it. And, with England
considerably weaker than they were in 2011, Madan Lal and
Balwinder Singh Sandhu, exponents of seam and swing
who have both tasted success in England, feel India with
a pace attack of Ishant Sharma, Bhuvneshwar Kumar,
Mohammed Shami, Varun Aaron, Pankaj Singh and Stuart
Binny stand as good a chance as ever to earn a fourth
series win in the country.
The former India internationals suggest that a bowler
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
17
keep the ball in the
batsmans half to
make the conditions
work for him.
You have to bowl
in the right areas. If
you release the ball
late, it might not
carry to the wicketkeeper, but if you hit the right spot, then
you can seam it around a lot, advises Madan Lal. You
have to aim for a three-quarters length, just short of good
length area. And you have to bowl in one corridor.
Bowling short is not going to solve problems, he says.
When you bowl short, the ball comes on to the bat nicely,
but if you bowl it up you have a chance of getting a caught
behind or caught in the slips. You have to bowl a length at
which the batsman can come out and drive you that will
give you a chance of getting wickets.
Sandhu agrees that bowlers need to make the movement
on offer work for them by pitching the ball up. India have
some good movers of the ball. You need to adjust your
lengths in England to get the best results. You have to pitch
it a bit further up than they will do here (in India). It will
give the ball time to swing and seam, says Sandhu.
But they have to bowl the right line too. See, the England
players arent new to swing bowling, so you have to bowl
in areas where they find it difficult to hit you. The Indian
bowlers already have the skills to get the ball to swing, its
only a matter of adapting to the conditions.
While stressing on the need to bowl fuller, Madan Lal
doesnt discount using the short ball as a surprise weapon.
The bouncer is a weapon for bowlers, but you cant over-
bowl it. Bowling in the corridor and keeping it up are what
you have to do consistently, he
explains. Of course you have to
use the bouncer, because it will
make the batsmans footwork
uncertain. They will have to think,
whether to go in front or back, so that makes a difference
when you bowl one or two short balls. If his footwork
becomes shaky, thats where you can always get wickets.
For Indias young attack, Zaheer Khan is a good example
sucker punch Zaheer Khan was not
just a master at moving the ball but could also work
beautifully on setting up a batsman.
Zaheer Khans contribution over two series 2002 and 2007 including an SD in 2007, makes him the second-highest impact bowler from India in England. In fact, his 4 for 59 and 5 for 75 at Trent Bridge in 2007 is the second-highest bowling impact performance of all time.
sAURABH soMAnI
-
18 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
to follow. Zaheer was not just a
master of swing conventional
and reverse when at his peak,
but could work beautifully on
setting up a batsman. He often stuck to a channel, making
the ball swing one way, subtly dragging the batsman out of
position with his line and movement. Then he landed the
sucker punch, moving the ball the other way, catching an
out-of-position batsman off-guard.
As an international bowler, you have to think like that,
says Madan Lal. You are not an international bowler if you
dont think like that. When you get the ball in hand, the
ball should talk. You have to watch the batsman - what is
he doing? Is he coming in front or going back?
Both Madan Lal and Sandhu believe Indias pace attack
is competent enough to deliver victory, even if conditions in
England have grown batting-friendly over the years. There
arent that many green pitches now, points out Madan
Lal. When we went, there was a lot of grass, but now the
pitches are better for batting. Earlier, there was also a lot
of moisture that used to stay under the pitch, so the ball
moved around more. It rains all the time, so that also keeps
the moisture there. Most of the load in England is taken by
the pacers, and I think they should win the series.
While the pacers will be expected to do the heavy lifting,
the spinners is also a valuable supporting act that can
make or break the attacks balance. A quality spinner helps
the fielding captain spread the load, juggle his options. By
getting through overs quicker, the spinner also offers the
fielding captain some measure of control over the timing
of new balls, not to speak of keeping over-rates in check.
Graeme Swann did that well for England, but with his
retirement and Monty Panesar being out of favour, India
have an added edge. England dont have (Kevin) Pietersen,
Graeme Swann or Jonathan Trott. Swann was giving them
good balance, bowling quickly and taking wickets, says
Madan Lal. He ensured the new ball was available earlier
by getting through his overs fast.
The last time when India got beaten, England had that
balance. But this time, I think India have a better chance.
Ill be surprised if they dont win the series.
Bowling short is not going to solve problems. Bowl it up and you have a chance of getting a caught behind or caught in the slips.
sweet spotAim for three-quarters length, just short of the
good length area, advises Madan Lal.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
19
leaVe a rooKie,retUrN a hero
the greenhorns in the 2014 indian team to engLand need onLy to Look to their predecessors for inspiration
m a N o j N a r a y a N
Sport has always been a bit of a drama queen. It loves its gallant characters and lionhearted conquerors, and loathes the villains who let chances slip. It has a particular fondness for the story of an underdog, the Davids that get the better of the Goliaths. And, as India embark on a five-Test tour of England this
summer, the underlying feeling is that, at this biggest of podiums, a unlikely hero is bound to rise.
In the 18-man party for England, itd be far less time
consuming to list those with experience of playing in that
country. Suffice to say only Mahendra Singh Dhoni, the
captain, Gautam Gambhir and Ishant Sharma survive from
the squad that suffered the 4-0 humiliation in 2011. Among
the rest, many of them relative greenhorns, Virat Kohli has
the most experience, with all of 24 Test caps so far.
Not for a while have India sent such an inexperienced
squad to the land of fish and chips.
If any of the relative unknowns in the current squad
need motivation, they need just look at their predecessors.
From Vinoo Mankad in 1946 to a baby-faced Parthiv Patel,
whose gritty, unbeaten 60-ball 19 on debut helped draw the
Trent Bridge Test in 2002, India have had many wild cards
-
20 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
giving the English more than what theyd have bargained
for.
During the 1946 tour, which lasted just over four months,
Mankad, considered one of the finest allrounders India has
ever produced, made his Test debut at Lords. By the end
of the tour, he had scored 1120 runs and taken 129 wickets
in 29 matches (Tests and tour games). No member of any
touring side has matched this since.
Abbas Ali Baig played just ten Tests over two decades,
but his name will be recalled for years thanks to his century
on debut in Manchester in 1959, after being called up as
replacement for the injured Vijay Manjrekar. With his 112
at Old Trafford, he, at 20 years and 131 days, became the
youngest Indian to score a Test century. That achievement
was later bettered by a certain Sachin Tendulkar, whose ton
in 1990 too came in Manchester. He was just 17 years and
107 days old, another rookie who took the world by storm.
There was Chetan Sharma in 1986; his 16 wickets in two
Tests, including a ten-wicket haul in Birmingham a first
for an Indian in England helped India claim a famous 2-0
win, their second series win in England.
Ten years later, Rahul Dravid, Sourav Ganguly and
Venkatesh Prasad all made their debuts in England. Prasad
ended the series as the joint highest wicket-taker with Chris
Lewis, Ganguly scored two centuries on debut at Lords
and at Trent Bridge and Dravid sparkled with valiant half-
centuries. The series heralded a new generation of players
who went on to build a legacy.
Heroes have a knack of announcing their arrival on the
biggest stage. Among the current crop, Stuart Binny, the
batting allrounder, certainly is poised to do so. On June 17,
in the second One-Day International of Indias brief tour
to Bangladesh, he returned 6 for 4 the best figures by
an Indian in the format to help
bundle out the opposition for
58. He later admitted the seam-
friendly conditions in Bangladesh,
precisely the kind expected in
England, played a part.
Indias pace bowling attack is especially thin on
experience. Apart from Ishant, who has 55 caps,
Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Mohammed Shami, Varun Aaron,
Ishwar Pandey and Pankaj Singh have a combined total of
13 Test appearances. Compare this with 2007, when India
won 1-0. The bowling attack was spearheaded by Zaheer
openIng testA baby-faced Parthiv
Patels gritty unbeaten 19 on debut helped draw the
Trent Bridge Test in 2002.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
21
Khan and Anil Kumble, who had, by then, combined
Test caps of 162, and they guided the likes of RP Singh, S
Sreesanth and Ramesh Powar.
Bhuvneshwar and Shami, both medium-pacers who
can move the ball, have for long impressed in the shorter
forms of the game and you get the feeling that theyre
due a big performance overseas. They have both played
six Tests each, with Shami particularly impressive with
27 wickets, including some in South Africa and New
Zealand. Meanwhile, Aaron, one of Indias few genuine fast
bowlers, struggled in the recent ODIs in New Zealand and
Bangladesh, and is something of a lottery ticket capable
of destruction, but equally susceptible to implosion.
While the batting will revolve around Kohli and
Cheteshwar Pujara, there is quality on the bench.
Wriddhiman Saha is a capable wicketkeeper-batsman
whose hopes of making the playing XI depend entirely on
Dhoni getting injured. Nevertheless, he makes for a fine
understudy, who showcased his skill with the bat during
the recent Indian Premier League, and itll be interesting
to watch him if hes called upon.
Bear in mind that while the big stage has its charms,
there are pitfalls as well. It is as much a shortcut to
greatness as it is a booby trap to obscurity. Flourish, and
respect is guaranteed, along with a few dedicated pages in
the sports history. Failure could mean a long stint on the
sidelines. For all the usual cricket clichs taking it one
game at a time and so on the larger picture will surely play
on the minds of the relative unknowns in the Indian squad.
Binny could well do a Mankad (no, not the dismissal),
while Bhuvneshwar and Shami can draw inspiration from
Chetan and Prasad. All that remains is for the lined-up
heroes to step up to the plate.
With inputs from Sidhanta Patnaik
If you could play a character from a movie, which one would you choose?
Christian Bale as Batman
If you could disappear from the limelight for a fortnight, where would you go and what would you do?
Chilling on a beach somewhere in the south of France
Favourite karaoke track?
Walk of Life, Dire Straits
A sportsperson from another field you idolise?
Roger Federer
What food/song/movie is your guilty pleasure?
I love watching movies. I must have watched Godfather at least 20 times.
Your dream machine?
Mustang GT 550
Quick SixV a r U N a a r o N
MAnoj nARAYAn
-
22 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
TrenT Bridge
1ST TEST
4TH TEST
JULY 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 10.00 GMT | 11.00 LOCAL | 15.30 IST
AUGUST 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 10.00 GMT | 11.00 LOCAL | 15.30 IST
1
4
HIGHEST SCOREIN AN INNINGSENGLAND
2
2
617 in 2002
198 in 2007
Michael Vaughan - 330 in 3 inns
Stuart Broad - 8 in 2 inns
6 for 46 - Stuart Broad in 2011
WON
DRAWN
HIGHEST TOTAL
LOWEST TOTAL
MOST RUNS
MOST WICKETS
BEST BOWLING (INNS)
INDIA
1
2
521 in 1996
157 in 1959
Sachin Tendulkar - 541 in 8 inns
12 - Zaheer Khan
5 for 75 - Zaheer Khan in 2007
177 - SACHIN TEDULKAR IN 1996
197 - MICHAEL VAUGHAN IN 2002
Old TraffOrdENGLAND
3
5
571/ 8d in 1936
294 In 1946
Wally Hammond - 244 in 3 inns
Sir Alec Bedser - 18 in 4 inns
167 - Wally Hammond in 1936
INDIA
0
5
432 in 1990
58 in 1952
Sunil Gavaskar - 242 in 5 inns
Vinoo Mankad - 9 in 3 inns
179 - Mohd. Azharuddin in 1990
BEST BOWLING IN AN INNINGS
WON
DRAWN
HIGHEST TOTAL
LOWEST TOTAL
MOST RUNS
MOST WICKETS
HIGHEST SCORE (INNS)8 FOR 31 BY FRED TRUEMAN IN 1952
6 FOR 102 BY DILIP DOSHI IN 1982
22 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
* Second Test at Lords (pg 38)
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
23
The Oval
rOse BOwl
HEAD TO HEAD
3RD TEST
AUGUST 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 10.00 GMT | 11.00 LOCAL | 15.30 IST
JULY 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 10.00 GMT | 11.00 LOCAL | 15.30 IST3
55TH TEST
MOST RUNS
IAN BELL: 365 IN 3 INNS
RAHUL DRAVID: 443 IN 5 INNS
ENGLAND
3
7
594 in 1982
101 in 1971
Fred Trueman - 12 in 3 inns
235 - Ian Bell in 2011
7 for 80 - Sir Gubby Allen
in 1936
WON
DRAWN
HIGHEST TOTAL
LOWEST TOTAL
MOST WICKETS
HIGHEST SCORE (INNS}
BEST BOWLING (INNS)
INDIA
1
7
664 in 2007
98 in 1952
Kapil Dev - 10 in 6 inns
221 - Sunil Gavaskar in 1979
6 for 38 - BS Chandrasekhar
ENGLAND27
Graham Gooch - 1134 in 17 inns
4 - Graham Gooch, Nasser Hussain, Michael
Vaughan and Kevin Pietersen
Fred Trueman - 53 in 17 inns
4 - Alec Bedser
WON
MOST RUNS
MOST 100
MOST WKTS
MOST 5 WKTS IN AN INNS
INDIA5
Sachin Tendulkar -1575 in 30 inns
6 - Rahul Dravid in 23 inns
Kapil Dev - 43 in 22 inns
2- Lala Amarnath, BS Chandrasekhar, Kapil Dev,
Vinoo Mankad, Mohammad Nissar,
Surendranath, Chetan Sharma
India have never played a Test in Southampton.
-
24 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
iN the hUNt forwiN No. 4
indias 16 test tours of engLand have had some thriLLing contests and personaL bests, but the hosts, with 12 wins against indias three, are
cLearLy ahead
s i D h a N t a p a t N a i K
The first All-India cricket team led by
Maharaja Bhupinder Singh travelled to
England in 1911 where they played 23
matches. But, it was another 21 years
before India played their first Test match
in England. Out of 16 Test series in England, India have
won three and drawn one.
1932: England 1 India 0England beat India by 158 runs in Indias inaugural Test
match, but the games best memories were generated by
Mohammad Nissar, the first Indian to take five wickets in
an innings, and Amar Singh, Indias new-ball pair picking
up three English wickets early on the first day. Douglas
Jardines 79 and Les Amess 65 steadied the innings, before
Bill Bowes, the debutant, and Bill Voce combined for 11
wickets, and Jardine made 85 in his second outing in a
clinical England win. For India, CK Nayudu, the captain,
made 40 in the first innings, batting with an injured hand.
Best Batsman: Douglas Jardine 164 runs at 164.00Best Bowler: Bill Bowes 6 wickets at 13.16, Mo-hammad Nissar 6 wickets at 22.50
***1936 (3): England 2 India 0
The poor man-management skills of Maharajkumar
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
25
of Vizianagram, Indias captain he sent Lala Amarnath,
Indias first centurion, back home in the middle of the
tour because of disciplinary issues was reflected in the
scoreline as they lost two Tests by nine wickets. While
Gubby Allen picked ten wickets in Englands win at Lords,
Wally Hammonds 217 and Allens 7 for 80 engineered the
victory at The Oval. Indias best batting display came at
Old Trafford, where Vijay Merchant and Syed Mushtaq
Ali scored centuries and put on 203 runs for the opening
wicket to draw the game.
Best Batsman: Wally Hammond 389 runs at 194.50Best Bowler: Gubby Allen 20 wickets at 16.50
***1946 (3): England 1 India 0
Alec Bedsers 11 wickets, Joe Hardstaff Jr.s unbeaten
205 and Englands ten-wicket win at Lords welcomed
international cricket back to the country after the Second
World War. England were close to winning the next three-
day Test at Old Trafford but
Indias last-wicket pair of Ranga
Sohoni and Dattaram Hindlekar
kept the bowlers at bay for the
final 13 minutes despite eight
men surrounding the bat. And, Vijay Merchants 128 was
the only source of joy for the crowd at a rainy Oval. Overall
on the tour, Vinoo Mankad fascinated with 1120 runs and
129 wickets.
Best Batsman: Vijay Merchant 245 runs at 49.00Best Bowler: Alec Bedser 24 wickets at 12.41
***1952 (4): England 3 India 0
Fred Trueman blew away India, on their first tour to
England after Independence, and his skills were best
advertised in his debut game, at his home ground, where
he and Bedser reduced India to 0 for 4 in the second
innings. Without Merchant, Amarnath and Mushtaq Ali,
pIoneers The class of 1932, led
by CK Nayudu. The team lost their first ever Test
by 158 runs.
sIdHAnTA PATnAIK
-
26 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
India relied heavily
on Vijay Hazare,
who along with Len
Hutton was the only
batsman to make
more than 300 runs.
Mankad joined the
team after the first
Test and left his
indelible mark at
Lords with two innings of 72 and 184, and a five-wicket
haul.
Best Batsman: Len Hutton 399 runs at 79.80Best Bowler: Fred Trueman 29 wickets at 13.31
***1959 (5): England 5 India 0
On their first five-Test tour to England, India lost three
games by an innings and the two others by 171 runs and
eight wickets respectively. England had Ken Barrington
and Colin Cowdrey, the two best batsmen in the series,
and Trueman, who was as lethal as in 1952. Abbas Ali Baig
was playing for Oxford University
when he was asked to replace
an injured Vijay Manjrekar, and
he repaid the faith of the tour
management committee at Old
Trafford by becoming, then, the youngest Indian to score
a Test century.
Best Batsman: Ken Barrington 357 runs at 59.50Best Bowler: Fred Trueman 24 wickets at 16.70
***1967 (3): England 3 India 0
The wet and chilly English weather was a challenge that
a young Indian team couldnt surmount, and they lost all
the three Tests by big margins. Geoffrey Boycott made an
unbeaten 246 at his home ground to set up the first win at
Headingley, but was dropped for the next Test for taking
573 minutes for scoring those runs. Tom Graveney and Ray
Illingworth starred with bat and ball respectively at Lords
before a team effort sealed off things at Edgbaston. For
India, Mansur Ali Khan Pataudi, the skipper, performed
credibly to win the Wisden Cricketer of the Year award.
IgnomInyFred Trueman and Alec
Bedser reduced India to 0 for 4 at Headingley, in their
first post-Independence tour to England.Ghulam Ahmeds match figures
of 7 for 137 at Headingley in 1952 came in 85 overs 40% of the bowling India did in that match. He also took 54% of the wickets India took in that match. That makes his the highest impact bowling performance by an Indian in England.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
27
Best Batsman: Ken Barrington 324 runs at 64.80Best Bowler: Ray Illingworth 20 wickets at 13.30
***1971 (3): England 0 India 1
Srinivas Venkataraghavan, Bhagwat Chandrasekhar and
Bishan Singh Bedi topped the bowling charts in Indias
first Test series win in England that came after three tightly
fought weather-affected games. India needed 38 runs and
had two wickets in hand at Lords when rain stopped play.
And, at Old Trafford, rain denied England a chance to
pick seven Indian wickets on the final day. Chandrasekhar
provided the impetus with a six-wicket haul on the fourth
day of The Oval match to set up Indias win, achieved with
four wickets in hand, to add to the series victory in West
Indies.
Best Batsman: Brian Luckhurst 244 runs at 40.66Best Bowler: Srinivas Venkataraghavan 13 wi-ckets at 26.92, Bhagwat Chandrasekhar 13 wickets at 29.15
1974 (3): England 3 India 0
India had won all three series
over the previous three years, but
the confidence bubble burst at Old Trafford where an all-
round England prevailed by 113 runs. The sucker punch
came at Lords where India, after following on, were done
in by the pace and swing of Geoff Arnold and Chris Old
to be skittled out for 42 in the first of two innings defeats
of the series. That the famed spin quartet managed only
15 wickets in the summer of 42 forced Ajit Wadekar, the
captain, to retire after the whitewash.
Best Batsman: Dennis Amiss 370 runs at 92.50Best Bowler: Chris Old 18 wickets at 13.83
***1979 (4): England 1 India 0
David Gowers unbeaten 200, Geoffrey Boycotts 155
and Ian Bothams seven wickets gave England an innings
top of the worldAjit Wadekar and BS Chandrasekhar were
stars of the 1971 series win, their first in
England.
sIdHAnTA PATnAIK
-
28 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
victory in the first
Test, but Sunil
Gavaskar scripted the
story of the series in
the fourth innings
of the final Test at
The Oval. India were
nine runs away from a series-levelling win when play was
called off, but Gavaskars flawless 221 earned him the right
to acknowledge the crowd with a raised stump. Rain and
centuries from Dilip Vengsarkar and Gundappa Viswanath
kept Indias hopes alive going to The Oval despite Botham
dismissing them for 96 in the first innings at Lords.
Best Batsman: Sunil Gavaskar 542 runs at 77.42 Best Bowler: Ian Botham 20 wickets at 23.60
***1982 (3): England 1 India 0
Soon after a series in India, the two teams met each other
once again at Lords where Kapil Dev was the Man of the
Match but Derek Randalls century and 15 victims between
Ian Botham and Bob Willis gave England a seven-wicket
win. The series was
another race between
Botham and Kapil
to stake their claim
as the worlds best
allrounder. Botham
hit a double-century
and picked nine
wickets, but Kapil, at his aggressive best during a 93-ball
97 at The Oval, was adjudged the Man of the Series for 292
runs and ten wickets.
Best Batsman: Ian Botham 403 runs at 134.33Best Bowler: Bob Willis 15 wickets at 22.00
***
1986 (3): England 0 India 2Dilip Vengsarkar found himself on the honours board at
Lords for the third time. And, in the absence of an injured
Chetan Sharma at Headingley, Roger Binny and Madan Lal,
called from the middle of his stint with Ashton in Central
Lancashire League, together took ten wickets. Vengsarkar
made another ton as India won two Tests for the first and,
till date, only time in a series in England. Sharma returned
at Edgbaston to become the first Indian to pick ten wickets
in a match in England, to go with his innings haul of five
wickets in the Lords win.
Best Batsman: Dilip Vengsarkar 360 runs at 90.00Best Bowler: Chetan Sharma 16 wickets at 18.75
***1990 (3): England 1 India 0
Graham Goochs monumental 333 and 123 at Lords the
highest match aggregate by a batsman at the venue along
with knocks by Allan Lamb and Robin Smith put India,
fresh from the One-Day International series win, out of
the contest. Ravi Shastri and Mohammad Azharuddin
salvaged some pride before Kapil Devs four consecutive
sixes off Eddie Hemmings avoided the follow-on. Shastri
and Azharuddin scored one more century each and David
Gower got a lifeline at The Oval, but the brightest moment
arrived in the second Test when a callow Sachin Tendulkars
maiden ton a super rearguard effort earned him respect.
Best Batsman: Graham Gooch 752 runs at 125.33Best Bowler: Angus Fraser 16 wickets at 28.75
***1996 (3): England 1 India 0
India, who fielded five debutants during the series, could
not prevent an England victory at Edgbaston, inspired by
Nasser Hussains 128 and Chris Lewiss 5 for 72 in the second
innings. But then, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid arrived
on the biggest stage with a century and 95 respectively at
If the team had made nine more runs, Gavaskars 221 in the fourth innings of the fourth 1979 Test could have been one of the highest impact innings in Indian cricket history.
Kapil Dev has a failure rate of just 14 per cent with the ball in 13 Tests. While this is impressive, it also suggests how little support he got from his other bowlers.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
29
Lords in Dickie Birds last Test as
umpire. Two hundreds each from
Sachin Tendulkar and Ganguly,
penetrative bowling by Venkatesh
Prasad and Javagal Srinath, and
Navjot Singh Sidhus walkout in the middle of the series
because of an altercation with Mohammad Azharuddin
dominated the headlines back home.
Best Batsman: Sachin Tendulkar 428 runs at 85.60Best Bowler: Chris Lewis 15 wickets at 23.73, Venkatesh Prasad 15 wickets at 25.00
***2002 (4): England 1 India 1
In a gripping series, Rahul Dravid gave India its first
significant overseas Test win since 1986 and outdid
Michael Vaughan in terms of aesthetics. Centuries by
Nasser Hussain, Vaughan and John Crawley, and Matthew
Hoggards match haul of seven wickets pushed India back
at Lords, but at Trent Bridge a 17-year-old Parthiv Patel
saved the day for his team before Dravid, Sanjay Bangar,
Sachin Tendulkar, Sourav Ganguly and the bowlers owned
five days at Headingley. If Ajit Agarkars century at Lords
made for nice trivia, Dravids 217 at The Oval was the
insignia of new India.
Best Batsman: Michael Vaughan 615 runs at 102.50Best Bowler: Anil Kumble 14 wickets at 36.00, Matthew Hoggard 14 wickets at 38.07
***2007 (3): England 0 India 1
At Trent Bridge, Zaheer Khan, who used his county
cricket experience to formulate Indias first Test series
win in England since 1986, scalped nine victims, even as
Wasim Jaffer and Dinesh Karthik set up the seven-wicket
victory with an
opening stand of
147 runs in the first
innings. While
Kevin Pietersen and
Michael Vaughan
made three hundreds
between them, Anil
Kumble was the
lone Indian to score
a century. Luck at
Lords and overall collective effort gave Rahul Dravids boys
the inaugural Pataudi Trophy, designed by Jocelyn Burton
to commemorate 75 years of Test cricket between the two
sides.
Best Batsman: Kevin Pietersen 345 runs at 57.50Best Bowler: Zaheer Khan 18 wickets at 20.33
***2011 (4): England 4 India 0
Rahul Dravids supremely crafted 461 runs, including
young gunsSourav Ganguly arrived on the big stage with a century at Lords in 1996.
Dinesh Karthik figures in the lists of highest runs tally impact batsmen (third, with 263 runs from three matches), highest new ball impact batsmen (first), highest partnership building Impact batsmen (second) and most consistent batsmen (first, ahead of Vijay Hazare and Vijay Merchant). This goes to show the strength of his contribution as an opening batsman in 2007.
sIdHAnTA PATnAIK
-
30 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
the accomplishment of his long
standing dream of scoring a
hundred at Lords, weighed little
on the face of a resurgent England,
who replaced India as the No. 1
Test side. In the 2000th Test at Lords, Zaheer Khan pulled
his hamstring before tea on Day 1, and Kevin Pietersen
and Ian Bell feasted
on the Indian attack
after that. Stuart
Broads hat-trick
and the burden on
Sachin Tendulkar to
score his hundredth
i n t e r n a t i o n a l
century added to
the situation as India looked jaded in one of the most
publicised bilateral series of recent times.
Best Batsman: Kevin Pietersen 533 runs at 106.60Best Bowler: Stuart Broad 25 wickets at 13.84
nadIrStuart Broad ripped through the Indian batting in the dismal 2011 series, ending with 25 wickets.
Praveen Kumar (three matches) is on the list for highest top/middle-order wickets tally impact bowlers (first), highest economy impact bowlers (third) and highest partnership-breaking impact bowlers (third). This indicates that without him, India would have lost more badly.
I bowled well in the first Test in 1971, got
three quick wickets, but couldnt maintain the
tempo. And I didnt bowl all that well in the second Test
in Manchester. Before the final Test, we were playing a practice
game and Hemu Adhikary, the manager, told me it was essential
for me to pick up wickets. Perhaps my head was on the chopping block,
I dont know, but I got 11 wickets in that game. But again, I didnt have a great first
innings at The Oval. Going into the last innings of the series, I told myself that this
was it if I wanted to keep playing for India, I must do well and take wickets, otherwise I must forget about international cricket.
My belief always has been that if you go out and bowl well, you will get success. If you dont bowl well, you wont get wickets. As simple as that. Dilip Sardesai was a very good assessor of the game. At that time, there was this horse called Mill Reef, which was winning all the big races in the United Kingdom. Sardesai used to refer to my faster one as Mill Reef. I was walking back to my run-up to come in and bowl to John Edrich, and in my mind, I had decided to bowl a googly. Just as I was about to turn, Dilip shouted Isko Mill Reef daalo. I did so and believe me, even before he could think of bringing his bat down, the stump went cartwheeling.
In walked Keith Fletcher, and I could see that he was not confident of facing me. So I said, let me bowl him a googly. I wanted to bowl two googlies to him. He played the first one fine, but the second pitched in the right spot, turned, and as he played forward, it took the edge and went off bat and pad. The great Eknath Solkar dived in front to take a brilliant catch, and when we came back after lunch, the sequence continued. Eventually, England were shot out for 101 and we needed 173 for our first win in England. There was also a threat of rain but we hung on and won by four wickets. I was delighted that I had a big hand in India winning the match. BS CHANDRASEKHAR took 6 for 38 in the third Test at The Oval in 1971.
As told to R Kaushik
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
31
the oNe that chaNgeD it all
in 1971, we had the spinners and the tight fieLding to support them. and, for the first time, we reaLised we couLd win abroad
a j i t w a D e K a r
I t was 1971. In the West Indies first, and then in England, we Indians realised, for the first time in our many years of Test cricket, that we could win abroad. I was credited with being the man who made it all happen, as the captain of the team on both those tours and then the win over England at home in 1972-73, but it was as much my team as it
was Tigers.
Tiger, the Nawab of Pataudi, and I were friends and we
played together a lot, and he had a lot of faith in me. He
was my captain. There were things he was trying to achieve,
like having a great fielding unit. By the time I became
captain, all I needed to do was improve the systems he had
put in place. Of course, I was from Mumbai khadoos,
professional. That does help. But I learnt captaincy from
Tiger. Things started falling in place. Our attitude had
become better. And our fielding it was so tight. That was
the best part in 1971.
When we went to the Caribbean, we went with a proper
strategy. Needless to say, a lot of our plans were built around
our spinners. There isnt any point being too ambitious.
We had to do what we could with the resources we had.
And thats where the spinners came in Bishan (Singh
Bedi), (Erapalli) Prasanna and Venkat (S Venkatraghavan).
-
32 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn AjIT WAdEKAR
Chandra (BS Chandrasekhar), of course, didnt play the
West Indies series, which, in a way, made him hungry for
success in England.
But what a team West Indies had. They had Garry
Sobers, of course, along with (Rohan) Kanhai and (Roy)
Fredericks and Clive Lloyd and (Vanburn) Holder. Lance
Gibbs was also there but he played only one Test. The win,
in the second Test at Port of Spain, was achieved by the
bowlers, but the series is synonymous with Sunny (Sunil
Gavaskar). He was on his first tour, and he scored over 700
(774) runs. And Dilip Sardesai was majestic as well. He also
scored over 600 (642) runs. And between them, Bishan,
Pras and Venkat got almost 50 (48) wickets in that series.
And in two months, we went to
England. Our strength was spin,
and the Test matches were in July-
August that year. The pitches had started to wear by then.
So we thought we stood a good chance. The first half of
the season is good for swing bowling, but we didnt have
any good fast bowlers. So it worked well for us. We had the
right horses for the course. We had the best of spinners.
Chandra was there too, though Pras missed out.
But England had just won the Ashes again. It was a seven-
Test series, and they won 2-0. There were no rankings those
days, but England were the best. And Ray Illingworth was
turnIng poIntEknath Solkar taking the
catch to dismiss Allan Knott, a thorn in the flesh
of the 1971 side.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
33
a very shrewd captain. He was almost 40 at the time, so he
was a pro. They were the clear favourites.
For us, it went back to the fielding. We had the spinners,
but what if we dropped Geoff Boycott? He would score 200.
We took our catches; we supported the spinners. And all
our batsmen also got runs in England. Maybe not Ashok
Mankad (42 runs in three Tests), but we stuck with him
because he had scored runs in the first-class games. And
we played the same XI in the three Tests. Sardesai got runs.
Farokh (Engineer), Vishy (GR Viswanath), Sunny, Eki
(Eknath Solkar) I got a few runs too. (Wadekar top scored
for India in the series with 204 runs.) And we attacked all
the time.
When I batted, it was about doing what was required.
When theres time, like at The Oval, where we had
one-and-a-half days to get 173 runs, its best to wait
for the opportunities. I got 48 in the first innings and,
unfortunately, was run out for 45 in the second. But
we needed under 100 runs then, so we didnt have any
problems. Earlier, in the first Test at Lords, I came in at
one-drop and John Snow was bowling. He bowled four-five
bouncers at me in the first over I faced, and I hit four of
those deliveries for boundaries. I think I batted for over
three hours for 85 in that innings the first of the series.
He didnt bowl any more bouncers after that.
But it was Chandra, who came to our rescue in the last
Test, at The Oval, which we won by four wickets. He got 6
for 38, and England were bowled out for just 101 in their
second innings. Oh, it was fantastic.
And Eki the best forward short-leg fielder ever. I think
it was because we played the Kanga League matches,
sometimes in the rainy season, where a lot of catches used
to pop up. He was superb. Eki had the best of reflexes and
anticipation, and he had patience. He seemed to know
when the catches would come. Eki he was so involved
in the game. Sometimes we used to take the wickets of the
top batsmen, but one of the lower-order batsmen would
hurt us. Allan Knott, for example, was a thorn in our flesh.
In the second innings of the last Test, Eki came to me and
asked, Captain, is it okay if I remove the bails? I asked
him why. Knott used to do what Shivnarine Chanderpaul
does mark his guard with the bails. I nodded. Eki did
it. Knott couldnt find the bails. He didnt know what was
happening. He marked his guard with his shoes. Eki then
took the bails out of his pocket and put them back. Maybe
it was just a superstition. Knott had scored 90 in the first
innings. He got just one run in the second Eki caught him
off Venkat.
With Snow, there was the incident in the first Test at
Lords with Sunny, when Snow collided with Sunny as
Sunny and Farokh were taking a quick run. Sunny went
sprawling Snow was a big man, after all. Everyone thought
we would protest. But you need to play the opposition,
and the media, which I did. I was asked about it. John
Woodcock was there too. I said I was slightly angry, but it
didnt matter as far as I was concerned, Sunny was just
one wicket, we had nine more. They didnt like my answer.
I think that helped. They made a big hullabaloo about it,
and poor Snow was dropped for the next Test.
I think the other thing that helped us is that when we
Whether its Sunil Gavaskar or Garry Sobers, if you go to England, you need to get acclimatised. We need to go there a month in advance.
AjIT WAdEKAR
-
34 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
went on such tours, we played a lot
of tour games. On that 1971 tour,
we played eight games before the
first Test. We lost to Essex, but we
won five of those games. That was
superb. And then we played six more tour games between
and after the Tests. The last time we went to England, half
the team went from the West Indies and half from India,
then they played one three-day game against Somerset and
were expected to play a Test.
Whether its Sunil Gavaskar or Garry Sobers, if you go
to England, you need to get acclimatised. Its not like going
to Mumbai or Chennai. Getting used to the conditions
is very important. The BCCI is going wrong with this I
understand there are scheduling problems, but we need
to go there a month in advance. Now, with Twenty20
and so much cricket, Indian cricketers dont play in the
county circuit like we did thats another handicap; its an
education for every young cricketer.
With the present team, there are also too many tourists.
How can you choose 18 players for a series? Will you change
the team for every game? There will be many players who
wont contribute in any way. But such is modern-day
cricket.
Anyway, after 1971, we went to England again in 1974.
We had won three series after West Indies and England,
we beat England at home too. But it so happened that the
team was not properly selected and we didnt have the fast
bowlers. It was raining and it was bitterly cold. I dont mean
it as an excuse, but we just couldnt get settled. Our match-
winner was Chandra. We had to keep him warm, but he
was cold all the time.
Also, you might not know this, a rule change was made
for the series that we were not aware of. When we used our
spinners, we had six fielders on the leg side two short
legs, one forward short-leg, a leg slip, and two others. Our
board had signed an agreement with them that for the
series, we would have only five fielders on the leg side. We
found out only when we reached England. That affected
our plans too.
But those arent
the reasons why
we did badly. We
needed fast bowlers,
which we didnt
have. Simple. We
just didnt play well.
The win in 1971
was good though.
People thought
West Indies was a
flash in the pan. Then we beat England in England, and it
showed that India could do well outside India. It changed
our attitudes. Before that, we had a bit of a complex when
we toured abroad. That changed after 1971.
Ajit Wadekar was the captain of the 1971 Indian Test team that beat England in England for the first time.
As told to Shamya Dasgupta
the arsenalIn 1971, a lot of Indias plans were built around the spinners (from left) BS Chandrasekhar, Bishan Singh Bedi, Erapalli Prasanna and S Venkatraghavan.
AjIT WAdEKAR
The series may be remembered for Chandrasekhars 6 for 38, but it was Ajit Wadekar (48 and 45 in the same Test, absorbing pressure of falling wickets) and Dilip Sardesai (54 and 40 in a 173-run chase) who came away with series defining knocks. Sardesai failed in three of the four Tests he played in England, but that knock ensured that he is the highest impact Indian batsman in England.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
35
a traDitioNof wroNg UNs
from the royaL sLight in 1936 to the great jeLLy beans pitch invasion of 2011, indias engLand sojourns are speckLed with controversies
r K a U s h i K
Its perhaps inevitable, especially in recent times given the high stakes and the massive scrutiny involved, that most international assignments across disciplines invite their fair share of drama and controversy. But even by that logic, there seems a strong bond between controversies and Indian tours of England, dating back to 1936 when Lala
Amarnath, the charismatic allrounder, was sent home on disciplinary grounds.
There has been the John Snow shoulder charge on Sunil
Gavaskar, the jelly beans incident involving Zaheer Khan
and the run out of Ian Bell that should have stayed but
for Mahendra Singh Dhonis decision to recall the lazy,
presumptuous batsman. And, not all controversies have
involved spats with the opposition years after Amarnaths
deportation, Navjot Singh Sidhu took an early flight back
home, walking out of the 1996 tour in a huff following an
alleged slight by Mohammad Azharuddin.
Heres a look back at some of the more memorable non-
cricketing incidents over the years.
Amarnath has a royal fallout (1936)A larger-than-life character even in that time and age, Lala
Amarnath did not suffer fools gladly. The Maharajkumar
-
36 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
of Vizianagaram was the tour captain not on cricketing
grounds, and while that was grudgingly accepted all around,
Amarnath did not take kindly to being kept waiting to bat
in the practice game against Minor Counties. After being
asked to pad up, Amarnath wasnt sent out to bat until ten
minutes before the end of the match. Furious, the Lala
ripped his gloves and pads off, flung them in disgust and
let loose a series of expletives in Punjabi, it was reported.
Vizzy, not taking kindly to the royal insult, recommended
that Amarnath be sent home. Senior players CK Nayudu,
Wazir Ali and Mohammad Nissar all pleaded Amarnaths
case, but to no avail. Amarnath beat a retreat, humiliated
and insulted, and while an enquiry later exonerated him of
wrongdoing, the damage had been done.
John Snow gets the cold shoulder (1971)India were chasing 183 for victory on the final day of the
first Test at Lords when Sunil Gavaskar, at the non-strikers
end, set off for a sharp single after Farokh Engineer played
John Snow down on to the leg side. Snow went chasing
after the ball, Gavaskar went charging down the track and
decided to take the wider route to the safety of the crease.
Incredibly, with the ball nowhere near him, Snow crashed
into Gavaskar, sending him tumbling and the bat flying out
of his hands. Snow picked up the bat and tossed it towards
Gavaskar, and while the Indians chose not to make a song
and dance of it, the Test and County Cricket Board (TCCB)
took a dim view of Snows conduct. Snow had already picked
up a reputation for being abrasive and even as he prepared
to go across to the
Indian dressing
room to apologise,
he was given a
dressing down by
Billy Griffith, the
secretary of the
TCCB. In a further
expression of their
displeasure, the TCCB dropped
Snow on disciplinary grounds for
the rest of the series, though he
was recalled at the last minute for
the final Test at The Oval, a match
India won by four wickets to complete their first Test and
series victory on English soil.
Prabhakar sees red at surprise call-up (1986)It wasnt so much a massive controversy as something
out of the ordinary, an event that proved to be the genesis
of souring of relations between Kapil Dev, the then captain,
and Manoj Prabhakar. Chetan Sharma had bowled India
to a five-wicket win in the first Test at Lords, Indias first
ever Lords victory, but was ruled out of the second Test at
Headingley through injury. Prabhakar, inexperienced but
already reputed to be a prodigious swing bowler, was in the
squad, but Kapil pulled Madan Lal out of the Lancashire
League to feed off his greater experience and familiarity
prankedJelly beans mysteriously appeared when Zaheer
came out to bat at Nottingham in 2007. He
went on to channel his rage into a match-winning
spell.
The highest impact Indian bowler in England is, strangely, a spinner. In the three Tests he played in 1986, Maninder Singh was able to tie up the opposition. He had a match haul of 4 for 54 in the first Test at Lords, off an astonishing 49.4 overs, and 4 for 26 off 16.3 overs in the second Test at Headingley.
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
37
with English conditions. Prabhakar didnt take the slight
lightly, while Madan Lal went on to winkle out Wilf Slack,
Chris Smith and Bill Athey in Englands first-innings
102, setting the stage for Indias series-clinching 279-run
triumph.
Sidhu, Azhar and all lost in translation (1996)A veteran of 13 years of international cricket, Navjot
Singh Sidhu sent Indian cricket into a tizzy by flying
back home midway through the tour of 1996. Various
theories were proffered for Sidhus dramatic departure,
including the fact that he had been padded up to bat in
a practice game, unaware that he had not been included
in the playing XI. An enquiry conducted by the Board of
Control for Cricket in India found the source of his angst
was a misunderstanding between him and Mohammad
Azharuddin, the captain, as revealed by Jaywant Lele,
the former BCCI secretary, in his 2011 autobiography. It
transpired that Sidhu took offence to the repeated use
of Hyderabadi slang by Azharuddin, which he deemed
derogatory, but is used affectionately in the land of the
Nawabs. It led to much mirth and amusement later on, but
no one was laughing in 1996 when Sidhu, one of the senior
batsmen in the squad, deserted ship.
Jelly beans leave a bitter taste (2007)It was a joke gone horribly wrong as England felt the
full range of Zaheer Khans fury during the second Test at
Nottingham. Jelly beans appeared mysteriously pitchside
when Zaheer came out to bat in Indias first innings. After
he pushed one away with the bat, more of them appeared
the next ball, enraging Indias pace spearhead no end.
Zaheer took off on Kevin Pietersen, not caring if Pietersen
was the culprit or not. It was suggested that the jelly beans
had been strewn around by Englands fielders either to
mock Zaheers weight, or to insinuate that the Indians
had been using it as a means to make the ball and help
facilitate reverse swing. England, though, wouldnt have
bargained for Zaheers rage, which he channelised into a
match-winning spell in the second innings. Zaheer took 5
for 75 in Englands second innings to help bowl them out
for 355 and set up Indias decisive seven-wicket victory.
Bell caught napping before tea (2011)A dozy Ian Bell had been run out off the last ball before
tea on the third day of the Nottingham Test in the most
unusual of circumstances. Eoin Morgan had played the last
ball before the interval to leg and the general impression
was that the ball had eluded the diving Praveen Kumar
and crossed the boundary rope. Praveen flung the ball
to Mahendra Singh Dhoni, who relayed it to Abhinav
Mukund, who broke the stumps even as Bell and Morgan
were on their way to the dressing room under the false
impression that the umpires had called over. After cross-
checking with the Indians that they wanted to go ahead
with the appeal, the umpires went to the television umpire,
who found that Bell, then on 137, was indeed out as per the
laws of the game. England, masters at using the Spirit of
the Game to their convenience, requested at the interval
through Andrew Strauss, their captain, and Andy Flower,
their coach, that Dhoni withdraw the appeal. Keen to avoid
needless drama even though they were in the right and the
fault was entirely Bells, the Indians withdrew the appeal,
winning applause from the same crowd that had, only a
few minutes earlier, booed them for the dopiness of their
own batsman.
It transpired that Sidhu took offence to the repeated use of Hyderabadi slang by Azharuddin, which he deemed derogatory, but is used affectionately in the land of the Nawabs.
R KAUsHIK
-
38 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
2
lOrd's2ND TEST
JULY 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 10.00 GMT | 11.00 LOCAL | 15.30 IST
THE MEN THAT MADE IT TO THE LORD'S HONOURS BOARD
BATTING
Vinoo Mankad (1952)Dilip Vengsarkar (1979, 1982, 1986) Gundappa Viswanath (1979)Ravi Shastri (1990) Mohammad Azharuddin (1990)Sourav Ganguly (1996)Ajit Agarkar (2002)Rahul Dravid (2011)
BOWLING
Mohammad Nissar (1932) L Amar Singh (1936)Lala Amarnath (1946)Vinoo Mankad (1952) Ramakant Desai (1959)BS Chandrasekhar (1967)Bishan Singh Bedi (1974)Kapil Dev (1982)Chetan Sharma (1986) Venkatesh Prasad (1996) RP Singh (2007) Praveen Kumar (2011) * No Indian has taken 10 wickets in a match at Lord's
A BATSMAN MUST ScorE A cENTUry; A BoWLEr MUST TAkE 5 WickETS iN AN iNNiNgS or 10 WickETS iN A MATch
38 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
39
ENGLAND
11
1
653/4d in 1990
134 In 1936
Sir Alec Bedser - 15 in 4 inns
333 - Graham Gooch in 1990
7 for 49 - Sir Alec Bedser in 1946
INDIA
1
11
454 in 1990
42 in 1974
Bishan Bedi, Kapil Dev - 17 in 5 and 7 inns
184 - Vinoo Mankad in 1952
6 for 35 - L Amar Singh in 1936
MOST RUNSDID YOU KNOW?All of Indias highest impact all-round performances have come at Lords: Kapil Devs 5 for 125 & 3 for 43, and 41 & 89 in 1982; Vinoo Mankads 72 & 184, and 5 for 196 & 0 for 35 in 1952; and Sourav Gangulys 131 and 2 for 49 & 1 for 5 in 1996. GRAHAM GOOCH:
588 IN 5 INNINGS
DILIP VENGSARKAR:508 IN 8 INNINGS
WON
DRAWN
HIGHEST TOTAL
LOWEST TOTAL
MOST WICKETS
HIGHEST SCORE (INNS)
BEST BOWLING (INNS)
39
-
40 IndIAs sUMMER sojoURn
a special seat at halloweD groUNDs
some memories of Lords of cricket traditions and cLassic contests, unforgiving stewards and forgettabLe food start from the press box
r m o h a N
There is always a bit of a culture shock in the first view of the Grace Gates and the
red brick pavilion beyond it on St. Johns
Wood Road. Back in the early 1980s,
the gatemen were not exactly known for their hospitality, their return greeting to a hearty Good morning being Come back another day when we have a tour of the museum. It needed some persuasion for him to pick up the phone and summon the executive who would hand out the precious gold medallion stamped with the MCC insignia that guarantees entry to Lords.
Armed with the medallion, it is a simple task to slip
past the OAP (old age pensioner) at the entrance to the
doorway and steps to the press box because he has served
in Trichnopoly in the war and knows something about
the Madras province and shares a memory or two before
cheering you on.
Of course, a level of fitness used to be called for to
take those steep stairs that left you wondering if cricket
correspondents known for the love of the ciggie and
the single malt in a thoroughly spoiled life of armchair
criticism should indeed be put through such an ordeal. It
may have been somewhat appropriate then that standing
at the entrance to the press box is the pantry that doubles
-
ISSUE 5, JULY 2014
41
up as the tavern with beer on tap. How times have changed.
At the entrance to the swanky media box a