winning the future with gmos

47
Winning the Future with Genetically Modified Crops Sameer Khanal hobbyfarmblog.com

Upload: sameer-khanal

Post on 11-Apr-2017

173 views

Category:

Science


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Winning the future with GMOs

Winning the Future with Genetically Modified Crops

Sameer Khanal

hobbyfarmblog.com

Page 2: Winning the future with GMOs

World’s farmland under GM crops

3.7 billion acres Arable land worldwide

376 million acres

In top five countries

$15 BNGlobal value of GM seed

in 2012

44 million acresRest of the world

420 millionacresof GM crops

worldwide

Isaaa.org, nature.com

Page 3: Winning the future with GMOs

The global picture (2012)

Isaaa.org, nature.com

Top 5 GM-crop producers

Other GM-crop producers

CanadaUSA

Brazil

Argentina

India

Page 4: Winning the future with GMOs

Soybean Cotton Corn Canola0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

81%

81%

35%

30%

Major GM crops of the world

Mill

ion

acre

sConventional

GM

Isaaa.org, nature.com

Page 5: Winning the future with GMOs

GM crops are growing

1996 2000 2004 2008 20120

50

100

150

200

250

Mill

ion

acre

s

Herbicide tolerance

Herbicide tolerance + Insect resistance(Stacked)

Insect resistance

Year Isaaa.org, nature.com

Page 6: Winning the future with GMOs

Farmers like GM cropsGM soybean adoption in the US

1996 2000 2004 2008 20120

20

40

60

80

100 Soybean

georgiamagazine.com , usda.gov

Prop

ortio

n of

tota

l cul

tivat

ed a

rea

Year

Page 7: Winning the future with GMOs

Farmers like GM cropsGM cotton adoption in the US

1996 2000 2004 2008 20120

20

40

60

80

100 SoybeanCotton

nature.com, usda.gov

Prop

ortio

n of

tota

l cul

tivat

ed a

rea

Year

Page 8: Winning the future with GMOs

Farmers like GM cropsGM corn adoption in the US

1996 2000 2004 2008 20120

20

40

60

80

100 SoybeanCottonCorn

ishratnazir.com, usda.gov

Prop

ortio

n of

tota

l cul

tivat

ed a

rea

Year

Page 9: Winning the future with GMOs

Increase in yield from GM

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

Bt

Non-Bt

0

900

720

540

360

180

3,080

1,080

Fibe

r yie

ld

(lbs/

acre

)

Hake, 2013

GM cotton adoption increased yield

GM cotton introduction

Page 10: Winning the future with GMOs

Farmers profit from GM crops2004 increase in farm income from GM crops

(US $ million)

Soybean Maize Cotton Canola Total0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Incr

ease

in fa

rm in

com

e

GM crop Brooks and Barfoot, 2005

Page 11: Winning the future with GMOs

Farmers profit from GM crops1996-2004 increase in farm income from GM crops

(US $ million)

Incr

ease

in fa

rm in

com

e

GM crop Brooks and Barfoot, 2005

Soybean Maize Cotton Canola Total0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

Page 12: Winning the future with GMOs

Yield ceiling is a fact!

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Yiel

d (lb

/acr

e)

Non-GM Corn yield in France and Italy (in thousand pounds)

2

4

6

8

10

12

ItalyFrance

Troyer,2006; epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

Page 13: Winning the future with GMOs

Yield ceiling, not yet!

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Yiel

d (lb

/acr

e)

Corn yield in the USA (in thousand pounds)

2

4

6

8

10

12

US

USDA.gov; Troyer,2006; epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu

ItalyFrance

Page 14: Winning the future with GMOs

Why against GM crops?

climatevoices.files.wordpress.com1.bp.blogspot.com,independent.co.uk,

Protests

Page 15: Winning the future with GMOs

GM controversies

Ecological effects

Séralini et al., 2012, fineartamerica.com

Health risks

Super weeds

Biodiversity loss

projects.nfstc.org, anbg.gov.au, crops.org,

Messing up with genetics

Page 16: Winning the future with GMOs

Plant improvement methods

Traditional breeding

Less likely More likelyUnintended genetic consequences

Genetic consequences of breeding

nap.edu, nunhems.com

Crossing

Page 17: Winning the future with GMOs

Plant improvement methods

Traditional breeding

Tissue culture

Less likely More likelyUnintended genetic consequences

Genetic consequences of breeding

nap.edu, technologyofplanttissueculture.blogspot.com

Tissue culture

Page 18: Winning the future with GMOs

Plant improvement methods

Traditional breeding

Tissue culture

Genetic modification

Less likely More likelyUnintended genetic consequences

Genetic consequences of breeding

nap.edu, earthtimes.org

Page 19: Winning the future with GMOs

Plant improvement methods

Traditional breeding

Tissue culture

Genetic modification

Induced mutation

Less likely More likelyUnintended genetic consequences

Genetic consequences of breeding

nap.edu, scienceisntfiction.blogspot.com

Page 20: Winning the future with GMOs

People are fine with the mutants

whiskiesofscotland.com , bottlerocket.com ,texasweet.com , giordanofoods.com

Pasta durum wheatRio Star grapefruit

Golden promise barley

Page 21: Winning the future with GMOs

Bt corn kills butterflies

Losey et al., 1999; fineartamerica.com; news.cornell.edu

Monarch butterfly Larva

Monarchs feed on weeds with Bt corn pollen

Page 22: Winning the future with GMOs

Non-Bt

Bt

Bt does not kill butterflies

1955 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005

Surv

ival

(%)

Survival of Bt or non-Bt pollen fed larvae

20

40

60

80

100

120

Stanley-Horn et al., 2001

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Time (days)

Page 23: Winning the future with GMOs

GM corn “wiped out the bees”

mygeni.org

?

Page 24: Winning the future with GMOs

GM not linked to colony collapse

scientificbeekeeping.com; gardenworld.in; Hendriksma et al., 2011

Heliconiapollen(toxic)

Non Bt pollen

Bt pollenBee larvae thrive well on Bt pollen

100

80

60

40

20

06 7 8 9 10 11

Time (days)

Surv

ival

(%)

Page 25: Winning the future with GMOs

Does Bt affect off-target?Study: cotton, corn, and potato

jaqstone.blogspot.com www.123rf.com visualphotos.comWelfenbarger et al., 2008

Page 26: Winning the future with GMOs

Does Bt affect off-target?

Off-target organisms

ent.iastate.edu, plantwise.org, firstlook.pnas.org, energyskeptic.com

Target insects

Page 27: Winning the future with GMOs

Does Bt affect off-target?Result: No difference in effect between Bt or non-Bt

Bt NonBtblog.daum.netWelfenbarger et al., 2008,

Page 28: Winning the future with GMOs

Non-BtBt

Bt does not affect off-target

I instar II instar III instar IV instar New-born

012345678

Lozzia et al. 1998; chonps.org

Deve

lopm

enta

l tim

e (d

ays)

Stage I Stage II Stage III Stage IV New-born

Aphids feeding on Bt corn

Aphids

Preborn stages

Page 29: Winning the future with GMOs

Profits from Bt corn

Profit calculation:

1 bushel = $6

US corn = 96 million acres annually

Profit = 96 x 6 = 576 million/yearusda.gov, genuity.com

Page 30: Winning the future with GMOs

GM-crops and “super-weeds”Glyphosate resistant weed

www.nature.com

Page 31: Winning the future with GMOs

How herbicide resistance evolve?Plants evolve

• Naturally and under human influence

arkansasagnews.uark.edu, pioneer.com

Herbicide applicationResistant

weed

Page 32: Winning the future with GMOs

Herbicide resistant weeds

After GM:11.5 cases/year

Before GM: 13 cases/year

1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010Year

Unique cases of herbicide resistant weedsin the world

400

350300

250200150

100

Uni

que

case

s

Heap, 2013, weedcontrolfreaks.com

Page 33: Winning the future with GMOs

Smart ways to combat “super weeds”

• Diversified weed management• Crop rotation

Corn Soybean

kellysluckyyou.com, infiniteunknown.net

Page 34: Winning the future with GMOs

Smart ways to combat “super weeds”

• Diversified weed management• Herbicides with different modes of action

rightinginjustice.com, foginfo.org

Page 35: Winning the future with GMOs

Smart ways to combat “super weeds”

• Diversified weed management• Traditional strategies

extension.umn.edu, kress-landtechnik.de

Mechanical weeding Deep tillage

Page 36: Winning the future with GMOs

Herbicide-tolerant crops

Advantages• Easier weed management

motherjones.com karensgarden.net

Page 37: Winning the future with GMOs

Herbicide-tolerant crops

Advantages• Less frequent application

-200

-150

-100

-50

0Q

uanti

tySoybean Corn Cotton

Reduced herbicide chemicals1996-2011 (in million pounds)

natureform.com , Brookes and Barefoot, 2013

Page 38: Winning the future with GMOs

Herbicide-tolerant crops

Advantages• Less frequent application• Relatively safe herbicides

0

4

8

12

16

Soybean Corn Cotton

Positive environmental impactEnvironmental Impact Quotient (EIQ)

Impa

ct (E

IQ)

natureform.com , Brookes and Barefoot, 2013

Page 39: Winning the future with GMOs

GM corn causes tumors

Séralini et al., 2012

Séraline’s 2012 paper

Page 40: Winning the future with GMOs

GM corn as foodWe experienced GM for over a decade

cache.boston.com, cute-n-tiny.com, foodprocessing-technology.com, izifunny.com, bloggingfoodforthought.blogspot.com

Page 41: Winning the future with GMOs

GM corn does not cause cancerEurope refutes Séraline’s paper

Countries: Belgium Denmark France Italy Netherlands Germany

Page 42: Winning the future with GMOs

Are GM crops threat to biodiversity?

4photos.net , myrighttosafefood.blogspot.com

Bt eggplant debate

Monoculture leads to varietal erosion

Eggplant diversity Eggplant

Page 43: Winning the future with GMOs

Varietal diversity is increasingEggplant varieties in the US:

1981 and 2004

0

25

50

75

100

125

1981 2004Year

No.

of v

arie

ties

Heald and Chapman, 2011

Page 44: Winning the future with GMOs

GM does not erode varietal diversity Field corn varieties in the US:

1981 and 2004

1981 2004Year

No.

of v

arie

ties

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Heald and Chapman, 2011

Page 45: Winning the future with GMOs

A book on science?

• Misrepresentation

• Hearsays

• False claims

• Cherry picking poor science

• Propaganda Smith, 2007infowarsshop.com,

A movie on science?

Page 46: Winning the future with GMOs

Summary

• The world is accepting and adopting GM crops

• Science is winning against propaganda

• GM crops are better than non-GM conventional systems

• GM crops are the future of agriculture

Page 47: Winning the future with GMOs

Thank youharvest-pr.com