winning contracts in a cover slide for all watkins meegan...
TRANSCRIPT
Watkins Meegan,
A Division of CohnReznick
W i n n i n g C o n t r a c t s i n a
C h a n g i n g I n d u s t r y
Cover slide for all
Watkins Meegan
presentations
after 10/31/2014
A g e n d a
• The Baseline
• Establishing Relationships
• Your Value Proposition
• Trends – Large, Small & Overall
• Direct and Indirect Strategies
• Other Strategies
• Conclusion
April 30, 2015 1
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
U n i q u e T i m e i n C o n t r a c t i n g
• LPTA / Best Value Pendulum
• Competition is fierce
• Compliance is high
• Less Procurement/Buying or more small business
• Stakes are higher than ever
• What does technology/economy look like in 10 years
• Who to team and not to team with
• Salaries going up and rates going down…huh?
April 30, 2015 2
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
C o m m e r c i a l S t r a t e g i e s
• Industry trends are towards diversification; We are seeing more -
Contractors moving into the commercial market
Commercial companies buying and folding government contractors into their
portfolios
Commercial companies entering into the federal market (earnings pressure)
• Risks of a commercial / GovCon mix
Government feels risks of rate development (shift in costs away from commercial
and towards government)
Risk of compliance on the commercial side
Firewalling / veiling commercial segments
April 30, 2015 3
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
T h e G o v e r n m e n t S a l e s C y c l e i s a
M a r a t h o n , N o t a S p r i n t
• Establishing relationships with agency levels is imperative (program and
acquisition)
• Agency procurement is generally decentralized
• Allow 24 months for relationship building
• Maintain relationships, be aware of upcoming retirements or assignments
• Don’t get incumbantitis
• Get in front of the RFP – use your RFI opportunity
April 30, 2015 5
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
D o Yo u r H o m e w o r k
• What does your target agency buy / need?
• How are they performing against their goals?
• What contract vehicles are most used by the agencies you have targeted?
• Agency websites and publications
• Agency lists of large prime contractors
• Upcoming RFP’s
April 30, 2015 6
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
I f i t L o o k s L i k e a D u c k , a n d W a l k s
L i k e a D u c k …
• Look like a government contractor
• Website and agency marketing materials
• Let the agencies know past performance, contract vehicles
• Discuss your marketing strategy around:
• Schedules / Multiple award contracts
• Prime & Subcontracting
• Teaming / Joint Venture Arrangements
• Mentor Protégé Agreements
• Registered on
• SAM
• Fedbizopps
April 30, 2015 7
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
A n d Q u a c k s L i k e a D u c k …
Hot Tip: Learn the acronyms and buzzwords (from “How to do Business With
the Federal Government”)
“I got together with the COTR (Pronounced “Co-Tar”) and put together a
JOFOC (Pronounced “Joe-Fock”) for the C.O. – She used it to justify a FAR
Part 8 limited competition under a GSA Sched 70 GWAC (Pronounced
“GeeWac”), and I won!”
April 30, 2015 8
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
W h a t R e a l l y W o r k s
(from “How to do Business With the Federal Government”) www.nist.gov
• Relationships
• Networking
• Multiple Contracting Vehicles
• Continuous Marketing
• Being Prepared
• Get Involved
• Past Performance
• Share Information
• Patience
• Persistence
April 30, 2015 9
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
Yo u r Va l u e P r o p o s i t i o n
• Have we forgotten what it is in an LPTA environment?
• How can you solve an agency’s problems?
• Your teaming arrangements
• Differentiate yourself
• Show agility and flexibility
• Do not lead with Socioeconomic status when establishing agency
relationships
April 30, 2015 10
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
S u c c e s s f u l R F P S t r a t e g i e s
• Anticipate (follow) the RFP
• Understand what LPTA means to that agency
• Understanding Reasonableness and Realism
• Know your competition
• Get teaming partners in place
April 30, 2015 12
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
B e s t Va l u e C o n t r a c t i n g
• Best Value evaluations can be ambiguous - important to understand agency
or contracting office tendencies. Some agencies publish internal guidelines
regarding best value determination.
• It is not uncommon for the successful Offeror to have a price 5-10% higher
in best value evaluations, but no more; and only if they are clearly the better
proposal.
• Trade Off Process: The Government uses a “trade off” process when it is in
their best interest to award to “other than the lowest priced offer”, or “other
than the highest technically rated offer”.
• LPTA: Low Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) is a conversation how we
bid to meet only the compliance threshold for acceptance, at the lowest
possible price.
• Summary: Trade-Off and LPTA are the two approaches per FAR 2.101. Best
Value is not a process, but the result of the process.
April 30, 2015 14
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
R e a s o n a b l e n e s s & R e a l i s m
• Reasonableness (FAR 15.404-1(a)) - Should answer the question: Is the
Government paying too much? Justification for how we came up with the
rates should be clearly outlined.
• Realism (FAR 15.404-1(d)(3)) - Shows the Government that you clearly
understand the solicitation requirements and have mapped the labor
categories appropriately to the hours.
April 30, 2015 15
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
R e a s o n a b l e n e s s
• 7 techniques and procedures to ensure a fair and reasonable submission
(FAR 15.404-1(b)(2):
• Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation –
Preferred technique
• Comparison of the proposed prices to historical prices paid
• Use of parametric estimating methods/application of rough yardsticks
• Comparison with competitive published price lists….
• Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates
(IGCE’s)
• Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for
the same or similar items
• Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data
April 30, 2015 16
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
B e s t V a l u e i n A c t i o n
• Notes from “ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND ADVANCED PLANNING
BRIEFING TO INDUSTRY” – November 2014.
• ACC-APG’s Business Process Initiatives for 2015
• Better definition of existing recompeted work
• FY13 LPTA & Tradeoff statistics - % of the time award made to the incumbent
• LPTA: 7%
• Tradeoff: 42%
• Protests went from 3.15% in FY13 to 16.94% in FY14.
• Competition for dwindling acquisition dollars
• Less experience in personnel (in debriefings and in communication with industry, and
evaluators)
• Emphasis on socio-economic goals
• Difficulty in performing cost realism
April 30, 2015 17
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
S h i f t i n R F P S e t - A s i d e s
• SBA gains muscle to make small business requirements even more
important – from 15% ranges to mandatory 60%+ (DHS 45% TCV).
Move from total subcontracted dollars to TCV.
SB% requirement as evaluation factor.
• DCAA and DCMA involvement in procurement cost assessments continue to
grow.
• Based on the FY2013 Scorecard Summary of Prime Contracting data
published by FPDS-NG:
April 30, 2015 19
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
S h i f t i n R F P S e t - A s i d e s – F Y 2 0 1 4
G o a l s
April 30, 2015 20
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
L a r g e C o n t r a c t o r s
April 30, 2015 21
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Competitors are focusing on keeping current contracts – this is key to
maintain customer and market position. The assault on cost factors
demands realignment (Consolidations, M&As).
• Large businesses are developing more cost allocation strategies to propose
and win with lower wrap rates.
• Fighting the misnomer: Small Business Small Price, Large Business Large
Price.
• Prime is responsible for Subcontractor price reasonableness analysis
• Increased rise in Estimating and Purchasing system audits:
Documentation of purchasing Subcontractors
“Negotiated” does not mean fair and reasonable
S m a l l C o n t r a c t o r s
April 30, 2015 22
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Many small companies have never been audited and don’t understand the
role of DCAA & DCMA.
• Small businesses often have challenges calculating their cost structures
resulting in them unknowingly overcharging or undercharging the
government.
• The ability to conduct a valuable competitive analysis is not feasible.
• Delays to the RFP release are extremely costly for industry and greatly
impact small businesses.
• SB companies don’t actually follow the estimating and purchasing
methodologies they write about in their cost proposals.
T h e C o m p e t i t i o n
April 30, 2015 23
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Increased focus on understanding the competition
• LPTA Bids – Competitive Rate Analysis
• Non-LPTA – Price to Win
• On a per proposal basis, Price to Win (PTW) provides a detailed, results
based assessment of the price that your competitor(s) is most likely to bid.
• Your PTW should be derived from your knowledge and research; your actual
proposed price should be based on your capability using a cost-up
approach.
• The PTW exercise may reveal a competitive price that exceeds your own
capabilities and may show new opportunities on how you can provide lower
price, better value.
• PTW is your competitors price and is based on their capabilities/cost
structure and ROI goals.
T h e C o m p e t i t i o n
April 30, 2015 24
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• The Price to Win process should be documented and structured
• Factors to Consider
• The Customer
• How much funding is available for the awarded contractor?
• What is an acceptable price range?
• Do we have any intelligence on which component of price the Customer
factors as “most important” – services, unit cost, total life cycle?
• Award Tendencies – Historic and Future, i.e. buying behavior
• The Competitors
• Past Performance
• Teammates
• SWOT Analysis
• How important is this opportunity – Incumbency
• Industry Days – key event in discerning serious bidders – Prime & Subs
• Factors should be custom for each procurement, but based on structured
methodology
S c o r i n g t h e C o m p e t i t i o n
April 30, 2015 25
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
D i r e c t S t r a t e g i e s
April 30, 2015 27
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Hard Truth #1: It is imperative that Direct Labor always be predictive in
nature.
• Hard Truth #2: Your Bid labor model is separate than your Operational labor model.
• Paid subscriptions to analyze labor data must be preferred over free user-generated
compensation surveys.
Understand the survey that is favored by DCAA and the agency you are
performing in
• Studying the Level of Effort, especially in Best Value procurements
• Direct Labor should be sectioned into quadrants and used when most appropriate:
High Price, High Margin
High Price, Low Margin
Low Price, High Margin
Low Price, Low Margin
D i r e c t S t r a t e g i e s - B O E
April 30, 2015 28
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Increased focus on Basis of Estimate in RFPs.
• Direct Labor Costs
• Reasonableness of Salary Data
• Compensation Plan Evaluation
• Indirect Costs
• Details to Pools and Bases
• Historic Rate information
• FPRAs
• Budgets
• If Win Impact
• Material Costs – via Bill of Materials
• Other Direct Costs
• CONUS Travel
• OCONUS Travel
I n d i r e c t S t r a t e g i e s - F r i n g e
April 30, 2015 29
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Fringe as a separate rate or as a service center / intermediate pool
Larger number of rate combinations can be made with Fringe as a separate rate
G & A
April 30, 2015 30
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Value Added (VA) versus Total Cost Input (TCI)
• TCI most widely used
• Use of the VA base LOWERS the burden on subcontracts:
When the discussion turns to “who will Prime,” the team member with the VA
base has an advantage.
When the competition turns to LPTA, VA vs. TCI can be the difference in winning
and losing for a team
T C I A d v a n t a g e i n L P TA
April 30, 2015 31
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
Advantage is when you have no or low materials or subs
R e g u l a t o r y G & A p r e s s u r e s
April 30, 2015 33
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• When sub content is high, the prime is exposed to potential unallowable costs under
FAR 31.203(i), “Excessive Pass-Through Costs” (G&A on subs).
• The implementing clause at FAR 52.215-23 can result in disallowed G&A on subs, but
specifically recognizes the allowability of “charges for the costs of managing
subcontracts and any applicable indirect costs and associated profit/fee based on
such costs”.
• High sub content is defined in the FAR provision and clause as 70% or more of total
costs. Contracting Officers, based on DCAA’s recommendations, may decide that
pass-through costs are excessive even when total sub content is less than 70%.
T r e n d i n g R a t e P o o l s
April 30, 2015 34
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Geography – OH Related
Client Site (also used for home office)
MSA (Metropolitan Statistical Areas)
Rural Site
Conus / Oconus
• Workforce – Fringe Related
Full Time
Part Time / Retired
SCA / CBA
• Skillset – OH
General
Advanced Degrees / Specialized Equipment
• Contract Driven
Cleared / Non-Cleared
Compliance Pools
Cost of Risk Pool
Why do we do this? Rate combinations = increased competitiveness
Be careful! You have to have enough base to withstand changes and still maintain the rate.
S e r v i c e C e n t e r s
April 30, 2015 35
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Service centers can be utilized to group costs that support other indirect and direct
functions.
• Provides greater flexibility to balance pools
• Provides greater base flexibility – there are various ways to equitably allocate an
indirect pool (non-CAS covered contractors).
• Not locked into the standard base definitions of final cost pools
• Typical Service Centers:
IT
Facility
HR
Recruiting
PMO
C e i l i n g R a t e s
April 30, 2015 36
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Monitoring rates against ceiling rates and tripwires in contracts is increasingly
important.
• Do repetitive ceiling rates require rate redevelopment?
• Up front tactic (RFP stage) – ask the ACO to state rate ceilings as a total overall
multiple rather than individual rate ceilings – this can help balance your over / under.
D F A R ’ s B u s i n e s s S y s t e m
S t r a t e g i e s
April 30, 2015 38
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Many solicitations requiring an “approved” Accounting system.
Getting Accounting System audits done and submitting them with your proposal
for competitive advantage and not getting locked out of a competition.
• CPSR’s and Estimating systems are on the rise.
Low first time pass rate but initiating a mock audit / readiness project significantly
reduces the number of findings and time to award.
• Update on proposed changes to DOD’s Business Systems Rule.
C A S S t r a t e g i e s
April 30, 2015 39
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Growth strategies may result in the potential for bidding on a CAS covered contract
• Many CAS disclosure statements are due either a) with the RFP submission or b)
upon award:
CAS is not a quick turnaround, it might be best to document and have it on the
shelf
• Once CAS covered, it is extremely important to have a system for tracking current
CAS contracts to determine if full coverage is triggered or when coverage ends. Also
helps with Cost Impact analysis…Contracts are CAS covered, Contractors are not.
C A S A p p l i c a b i l i t y
April 30, 2015 40
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
Full Coverage M o d i f i e d Coverage
Modified Coverage
Awards from $7.5M up to $50M
May require Disclosure Statement
CAS 401, 402, 405 & 406 only
Negotiated Contracts and
Subcontracts
Exceeding $700,000
– Includes options
CAS coverage at award remains
for life of contract
Full Coverage
Awards estimated to exceed $50M,
including option amounts
File Disclosure Statement
Comply with all standards
Negotiated Contracts and
Subcontracts
Exceeding $700,000
– Includes options
CAS coverage at award remains
for life of contract
F o r w a r d T h i n k i n g
April 30, 2015 41
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
• Remember the marathon
• Understand what business and agencies you are tracking
• Have the right relationships in place
• Be prepared for the effects of future win’s (Business Systems, CAS, Etc.)
• Know what it means to be competitive and have a rate structure that compliments
• Revisit your old friend – your value proposition
C o n t a c t I n f o r m a t i o n
April 30, 2015 42
This is a
standard “Title
and Content”
slide layout
Kristen Soles, Partner
703-847-4411
Jacob George
703-424-0681