windows server 2003 end of support - compucom.com · consider this for the windows server 2003: the...
TRANSCRIPT
Windows Server 2003 End of Support Options
February 26, 2015Copyright 2015 CompuCom Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. This document is copyright protected with all rights reserved and may not be
reproduced in whole or part without express written permission from CompuCom Systems, Inc. All trademarks and trade names mentioned herein
are the property of their respective owners. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice.
© 2015 CompuCom. 2
Agenda
Welcome and Introduction
– Heather Peyton,
CompuCom
Windows Server 2003 End
of Support Options and
Remediation Strategies
– Todd Pekats, CompuCom
Q and A
© 2015 CompuCom. 4
Persona & Community Services Identity & Entitlement User Experience Management TCO & ROI Tracking Business & Technology Alignment
Mobility & Device Services Provisioning Hardware Management Operating Environment Management Depot & Disposition
Application Marketplace Services Application Portfolio Management License Management Mobile, Application Development & Testing Unified Collaboration
Workplace Services On-Site Maintenance Services Solution Cafés Retail Operations
End-User Enablement
Converged Technology Operations Integrated Monitoring Administration & Orchestration Security Management
Data Center Services Private Cloud & Virtualization Storage & Data Protection Data Center Operations
Cloud Computing Services Community Cloud Public Cloud Hybrid Cloud Persona Cloud
Network Services Edge & Core Network IP Communications Telecom Services Software Defined Network
Data Center and Cloud Services
Service Experience Management
Personal Portal Services End-User Portal Business-User Portal Customer Intelligence & Analytics
Customer Care Services Service Desk Hybrid Support Services Procurement Support
Integrated Infrastructure Management Service & Configuration Knowledge Service Catalog ITIL Lifecycle Processes B2B Data Interchanges
Program Management Services On-Demand Workforce Governance & Optimization Project Services
What CompuCom Does
© 2015 CompuCom. 6
Consider this for the Windows Server 2003:
The last Service Pack was issued more than six years ago.
Regular or “mainstream” support ended three years ago.
The product is now on “extended support.”
All support ends in July 2015.
© 2015 CompuCom. 8
What End of Support Means
Start planning your migration and transforming your datacenter todayDiscontinued support for many applications
Nowis the time to act
Increased operations costs
Impact on Microsoft Small Business Server 2003
Impact on both physical and virtualized servers
Nosafe haven
Nosafe haven
Windows 2003/R2 servers will not pass a compliance audit
Nocompliance
Nocompliance
37 critical updates released in 2013 for Windows Server 2003/R2
Noupdates
Noupdates
© 2015 CompuCom. 9
32% of Servers are
>4 Years Old1 32 %
> 4 YEARS OLD
Make up only 4% of
Total Performance
Capabilities of Servers1 4%
> 4 YEARS OLD
Use 65% of Total
Energy Consumption1 65> 4 YEARS OLD
%
26%
CAPEX
74 %
OPEX
Business innovation throttled to 26%2
Time to revenue
Cost of lost time, effort, opportunity
Unpredictable business cycles
74% captive in operations and
maintenance2
Rigid & aging infrastructure
Application & information complexity
Inflexible business processes
1*
Sourc
e:
Inte
l analy
sis
, 2012
2*
Sourc
e:
Gart
ner,
IT
Metr
ics:
Alig
n IT
Investm
ent
Levels
With S
trate
gy
Usin
g R
un,
Gro
w,
Tra
nsfo
rm a
nd B
eyo
nd
(Marc
h 2
012)
Softw
are
and w
ork
loads u
sed in p
erf
orm
ance t
ests
may
have b
een o
ptim
ized f
or
perf
orm
ance o
nly
on Inte
l
mic
ropro
cessors
. P
erf
orm
ance t
ests
, such a
s S
YS
mark
and M
obile
Mark
, are
measure
d u
sin
g s
pecific
com
pute
r
sys
tem
s,
com
ponents
, softw
are
, opera
tions a
nd f
unctions.
Any
change t
o a
ny
of
those f
acto
rs m
ay
cause t
he r
esults
to v
ary
. Y
ou s
hould
consult o
ther
info
rmation a
nd p
erf
orm
ance t
ests
to a
ssis
t yo
u in f
ully
evalu
ating y
our
conte
mpla
ted p
urc
hases,
inclu
din
g t
he p
erf
orm
ance o
f th
at
pro
duct
when c
om
bin
ed w
ith o
ther
pro
ducts
.
For
more
info
rmation g
o t
o h
ttp://w
ww
.inte
l.com
/pe
rfo
rma
nce
Aging Infrastructure is Inefficient and Costly
© 2014 CompuCom. 10
• High cost custom support agreements (CSAs) – first year are
usually in the range of $200K and can compound
• Existing physical hardware may be 5-7 years old, expensive
to maintain
• No direct upgrade path to Windows 2012 R2
• Need to address applications as well as the OS
• Can’t take advantage of modern IT infrastructure and
management tools
Why is Doing Nothing Not an Option
• Windows updates – including security will no longer
be available
• Microsoft will no longer support virtualized platform
• Regulatory issues
Risk
Cost
Complexity
Infrastructure ModernizationWhat it will cost and what the steps involved are, and how to
leverage tools and services.
© 2015 CompuCom. 12
I want higher application
Availability
Evolution or Revolution!
I want increased
Capacity in server
administration
I want to reduce IT
infrastructure spend
and get better
Scalabilityand performance
I want increased
Flexibility and be
able to support private
cloud
I want improved
Storageefficiencies
I want greater
End-Userproductivity
© 2015 CompuCom. 15
Key Considerations:
How old is your installed base?
Is your equipment out of warranty?
Are you sufficiently protecting your data?
Do you want to virtualize everything on-premise or are you open to
moving to the public cloud?
© 2015 CompuCom. 17
CompuCom’s Server Migration Approach
•Establish application support structure
•Implement migration solutions in a phased in approach to mitigate loss of service and impacts to the organization
•Validate migration activities
•Client execute UAT on migrated applications
•Provide post migration support based on contract requirements.
•Decommission legacy hardware and either re-deploy or release for disposal
Implementation (Migrate)
•Develop migrations solutions on an application by application basis.
•Review migrations solutions with application owners and incorporate feedback
•Finalize migration solution options and document.
•Where possible establish a test lab to validate migration solutions.
•Review test results with client
•Develop migration implementation plan that aligns to business SLA’s, application dependencies and outage windows
•Develop and communicate application support structure to be used during migration waves
Design (Target)
•Determine available support on existing hardware.
•Determine minimum hardware specifications for any re-deployable hardware
•Determine what systems can be re-deployable with reasonable hardware upgrades
•Map out application dependencies
•Review application upgrade paths
•Review possible areas for application transformations.
•Review area’s for application consolidation
•Rationalize both the H/W and software lists and determine areas of reduction, upgrades and transformations
•Determine application criticality to the organization
Planning (Assess)
•Deploy our discovery tools across the server farm to gather detailed information on existing hardware, OS, applications, etc.
•Receive and reconcile license entitlement information from the client and/or providers
•Gather application availability information (business SLA’s, outage windows, etc.)
•Gather information from client on application owners.
•Cross reference available information with customer supplied inventory lists.
•Receive hardware support information from client
•Consolidate H/W and S/W lists to develop a complete inventory of all in scope servers
Discovery
© 2015 CompuCom. 18
Dig Deeper with the Discover and Assessment Process
Microsoft Assessment and Planning (MAP) Toolkit
Agentless, automated, multi-product planning and assessment tool for
quicker and easier desktop, server, and cloud migrations.
Provides detailed readiness assessment reports and executive
proposals with extensive hardware and software information, as well
as actionable recommendations to help organizations accelerate their
IT infrastructure planning process and gather more detail on assets
that reside within their current environment.
Also provides server utilization data for Hyper-V server virtualization
planning, server placement identification, and virtualization candidate
assessments performance.
© 2014 CompuCom. 19
Windows Server
2012 R2
Microsoft
AzureCloud OS Network
Evaluate options for each application and workload
Destination Targeting is a Key Piece of the Discussion
© 2014 CompuCom. 21
Hardware – Decisions
Windows Server 2012 R2 requires more
powerful hardware
Relocate to the
cloud
Virtualize on
other Server
Replace Server
hardware
© 2014 CompuCom. 23
Hybrid Cloud
“Servers in the data center used to be
special; they were like family pets!
They were sensitive, we fed them and
cared for them.
Servers in the modern datacenter are like
cattle. If they go down or have problems,
we just shoot them and bring in another
one.” (quote from presenter in video training talks from Microsoft)
A wise
man
said,
© 2015 CompuCom. 24
Building the Modern Datacenter
Yes
78%
Maybe
17%
Will your enterprise be pursuing a private cloud
computing strategy by 2014?
n = 150
Source: Top Five Trends for Private Cloud Computing14 Feb 2012, #G00230746
Gartner
Design private cloud deployments with interoperability
and future hybrid in mind.
Especially in larger enterprises, consider the evolution to hybrid
cloud computing as part of a broader strategy to position IT as the broker for a broad mix
of IT services deliveredin many different ways —
hybrid IT.
Source: Design Your Private Cloud With Hybrid in Mind24 February 2012 #G00230748
Gartner
No5%
© 2015 CompuCom. 25
Considerable This
It is believed that large customers will maintain a significant amount of
their IT facilities and staff at their sites, and by 2020, about 80% of the
world’s 2,000 largest companies will still have greater than 50% of
their IT onsite (IDC 2014).
Early-stage companies (less than five years in business) are the most
eager buyers of cloud, concerned with start-up capital costs and less
likely to build and staff a conventional datacenter, and plan to increase
their spend on public cloud by 24% over the next few years (IDC
2014).
© 2015 CompuCom. 27
Suitable for Organizations using Active Directory (AD)
Provides best experience to most customers using AD
Supports Exchange and Lync Co-existence scenarios
Coupled with ADFS, provides best option for federation and synchronization
Supports Password Synchronization with no additional cost
Does not require any additional software licenses
Suitable for small/medium size organizations with AD or Non-AD
Performance limitations apply with PowerShell and Graph API provisioning
PowerShell requires scripting experience
PowerShell option can be used where the customer/partner may have wrappers around PowerShell scripts (eg: Self Service Provisioning)
PowerShell & Graph API
Suitable for large organizations with certain AD and Non-AD scenarios
Requires Forefront Identity Manager (FIM), soon to be Microsoft Identity Manager and additional software licenses
Additional automation capabilities
Coupled with ADFS, provides flexible option for federation and synchronization
Non-AD synchronization
Directory Sync Options
© 2015 CompuCom. 29
Data Center Migration Services
• Migration Planning &
Design
• Asset Discovery &
Inventory
• Physical Relocation
● Hardware de-install
● Logistics
● Hardware re-install
• Project Management
• Data Center
Transformation
• Consolidation &
Rationalization
• Cloud & Converged
Infrastructure
• Virtualization
• Network Integration
• Cloud Integration
• Server Workloads
● Physical-to-Physical
● Physical-to-Virtual
● Virtual-to-Virtual
• Data Migration
• Applications &
Database
Data Center Services Infrastructure Services Migration Services
CompuCom’s Data Center Migration Services provide a smooth transition to
Managed Data Center and/or Cloud Services
© 2015 CompuCom. 30
Microsoft AD Related Services and Enablement
Active Directory Design Services
Active Directory Consolidation Assessment
Active Directory Migration Services
Cloud Enablement Services and Federation
Assisting with Active Directory Aware Applications
– Lync
– Exchange
– SharePoint
– System Center
– Office 365
– Azure
© 2015 CompuCom. 31
Microsoft Virtualization Interactive Solution Briefing
Discuss current and future states of Windows virtualization
Hyper-V virtualization deployment methodologies and tools
Virtual server management with System Center products
High-availability best practices
VMware and Hyper-V coexistence
Define planning and design the project and timeline
31
© 2015 CompuCom. 32
Case Study – Retail WinSvr 2003 Migration
Customer: Retail Organization expecting to grow from 20 stores to 100 in 5 years.
Problem: Customer had a Windows 2003 server infrastructure with tape backups and scripted copies to DR site. – Single SQL 2005 database running
all critical transactions. Used database replication for DR.
– Limited staff, and could not grow back office staff fast enough and had major space limitations.
– No virtualization platform. 32
© 2015 CompuCom. 33
Case Study – Retail WinSvr2003 Migration (cont.)
Solution: Built a Hyper-v based virtualization platform on Windows Server 2012 infrastructure that included:
– Clustered SQL 2012 database with HA session failover.
– Always ON database to support HA in a Colocation site.
– Configured VM replication to DR site for failover
– Implemented SCOM to monitor performance and HA
– Installed SCVMM to manage VM’s across the organization and auto failover VM’s to DR site based on conditions.
– Reduced server footprint at main and DR site.
33
© 2015 CompuCom. 34
Case Study Results
New physicals
servers
New Software
Licenses
Dynamic and
Highly Resilient
Infrastructure
Cloud Ready
Alignment with
our Portfolio
Offering