wind engineering module 3.1 lakshmi sankar recap in module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives,...

33
Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar

Upload: amberly-peters

Post on 03-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Wind Engineering

Module 3.1

Lakshmi Sankar

Page 2: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Recap

• In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site.

• In module 1.2, we looked at the history of wind turbine technology, some terminology, and definitions.

• In module 1.3, we looked at three studies – an off-shore site, guidelines for small wind turbines, and design of utility class wind turbines.

• Once module 1 is completed, you are ready to select a wind turbine anywhere in the world that you choose, and learn about the wind resources, energy needs, environmental issues, public policies, etc.

Page 3: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Recap, continued

• In module 2, we modeled the wind turbine as an actuator disk.– We found that air starts decelerating even before it

reaches the rotor disk. One half of the deceleration takes place upstream of the wind turbine, and the other half of the deceleration takes place in the space between the rotor and the far wake.

– We discovered Betz limit: If wind has a velocity of V, and the turbine disk area is A, the maximum power that can be extracted is (16/27) * ½ * rho * V ^3 * A

Page 4: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Use of Lift forces for Torque ProductionUse of Lift forces for Torque Production

L

D

Vwind - Vinduced

L sinDcos

r

Propulsive force = L`sin – D`cos

DΩr

VVL inducedwind

Page 5: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Lift and Drag Forces• In module 1.2, we discussed that the net thrust force is

L’sin() – D’ cos()– L’ is the lift force per unit span of the rotor section, and D’ is the

drag force per unit span.• In this module, we will learn how to compute or estimate L`

and D`.– In module 3.1, we will first learn some basic characteristics of

airfoils.– In module 3.2, we will develop the governing equations. – In module 3.3, we will show how to solve the equations on computer

using panel method to compute lift.– In module 3.4, we will discuss how the panel method is used with

empirical methods to compute the viscous drag forces– In module 3.5, we will discuss how designers change the shape of

the airfoils to get high L’ and low D’ at the same time.

Page 6: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Topics To be Studied

• Airfoil Nomenclature

• Lift and Drag forces

• Lift, Drag and Pressure Coefficients

Page 7: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Uses of Airfoils

• Wings

• Propellers and Turbofans

• Helicopter Rotors

• Compressors and Turbines

• Hydrofoils (wing-like devices which can lift up a boat above waterline)

• Wind Turbines

Page 8: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Evolution of Airfoils

Early Designs - Designers mistakenly believed that theseairfoils with sharp leading edges will have low drag.In practice, they stalled quickly, and generated considerable drag.

Page 9: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Airfoil

Chord Line

Camber LineEqual amounts of thickness is added to camberin a direction normal to the camber line.

Page 10: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

An Airfoil is Defined as a superposition of

• Chord Line

• Camber line drawn with respect to the chord line.

• Thickness Distribution which is added to the camber line, normal to the camber line.

• Symmetric airfoils have no camber.

Page 11: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Angle of Attack

V

Angle of attack is defined as the angle between the freestreamand the chord line. It is given the symbol .Because modern wings have a built-in twist distribution, theangle of attack will change from root to tip.The root will, in general, have a high angle of attack.The tip will, in general, have a low (or even a negative) .

Page 12: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Lift and Drag Forces acting on a Wing Section

Sectional Drag, D´

Sectional Lift, L ´

The component of aerodynamic forces normal to the freestream, per unit length of span (e.g. per foot of wing span), is called the sectional lift force, and is given the symbol L ´.

The component of aerodynamic forces along the freestream, per unit length of span (e.g. per foot of wing span), is called the sectional drag force, and is given the symbol D ´.

V

Page 13: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Sectional Lift and Drag Coefficients

• The sectional lift coefficient Cl is defined as:

• Here c is the airfoil chord, i.e. distance between the leading edge and trailing edge, measured along the chordline.

• The sectional drag force coefficient Cd is likewise defined as:

cV

LCl

2

21

cV

DCd

2

21

Page 14: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Note that...• When we are taking about an entire wing

we use L, D, CL and CD to denote the forces and coefficients.

• When we are dealing with just a section of the wing, we call the forces acting on that section (per unit span) L´ and D ´, and the coefficients Cl and Cd

Page 15: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Pressure Forces acting on the Airfoil

High PressureLow velocity

High PressureLow velocity

Low PressureHigh velocity

Low PressureHigh velocity

Bernoulli’s equation says where pressure is high, velocity will below and vice versa.

Page 16: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Pressure Forces acting on the Airfoil

High PressureLow velocity

High PressureLow velocity

Low PressureHigh velocity

Low PressureHigh velocity

Bernoulli’s equation says where pressure is high, velocity will below and vice versa.

Page 17: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Subtract off atmospheric Pressure p everywhere.Resulting Pressure Forces acting on the Airfoil

High p-p

Low velocity

High p-p

Low velocityLow p-p

High velocity

Low p-p

High velocity

The quantity p-p is called the gauge pressure. It will be negative over portions of the airfoil, especially the upper surface. This is because velocity there is high and the pressures can fall belowatmospheric pressure.

Page 18: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Relationship between L´ and p

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

sideupper sidelower

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

sideupper

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

sidelower

pp

pp

sideupper on Force-sidelower on the acting Forces

direction wind the tonormal Force

dx

dxdx

L

V

Page 19: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Relationship between L´ and p(Continued)

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

sideupper sidelower

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

sideupper sidelower

pp

pp

dxpp

dxL

Divide left and right sides by cV 2

2

1

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

upperlower

c

xd

V

pp

V

pp

cV

L

222

21

21

21

We get:

Page 20: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Pressure Coefficient CpFrom the previous slide,

EdgeTrailing

EdgeLeading

upperlower

c

xd

V

pp

V

pp

cV

L

222

21

21

21

The left side was previously defined as the sectional liftcoefficient Cl.

The pressure coefficient is defined as:

2

21

V

ppC p

Thus, edgeTrailing

edgeLeading

upperplowerpl c

xdCCC ,,

Page 21: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Why use Cl, Cp etc.?

• Why do we use “abstract” quantities such as Cl and Cp?

• Why not directly use physically meaningful quantities such as Lift force, lift per unit span , pressure etc.?

Page 22: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

The Importance of Non-Dimensional Forms

Consider two geometrically similar airfoils.One is small, used in a wind tunnel.The other is large, used on an actual wing.These will operate in different environments - density, velocity.This is because high altitude conditions are not easily reproduced in wind tunnels.They will therefore have different Lift forces and pressure fields.They will have identical Cl , Cd and Cp

- if they are geometrically alike- operate at identical angle of attack, Mach number and Reynolds number

Page 23: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

The Importance of Non-Dimensional Forms

In other words, a small airfoil , tested in a wind tunnel.And a large airfoil, used on an actual wingwill have identical non-dimensional coefficients Cl , Cd and Cp

- if they are geometrically alike- operate at identical angle of attack, Mach number and Reynolds number.

This allows designers (and engineers) to build and testsmall scale models, and extrapolate qualitative features,but also quantitative information, from a small scale modelto a full size configuration.

Page 24: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Once Cl, Cd etc. are found, they can be plotted for use in all applications - model or full size aircraft

• The geometry must be similar (i.e. scaled) between applications.

• The Reynolds number must be the same for the model and full scale.

• The Mach number must be the same for the model and full scale.

• Then, the behavior of non-dimensional quantities Cp, CL, CD, etc will also be the same.

Page 25: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Characteristics of Cl vs.

Angle of Attack, in degrees or radians

Cl

Slope= 2 if is in radians.

= 0Angle ofzero lift

Stall

Page 26: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

The angle of zero lift depends onthe camber of the airfoil

Angle of Attack, in degrees or radians

Cl

= 0Angle ofzero lift

Cambered airfoil

Symmetric Airfoil

Page 27: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Mathematical Model for Cl vs. at low angles of attack

Incompressible Flow: 02 lC

is in radians

Page 28: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Drag is caused by• Skin Friction - the air molecules try to drag the airfoil

with them. This effect is due to viscosity.• Pressure Drag - The flow separates near the trailing

edge, due to the shape of the body. This causes low pressures near the trailing edge compared to the leading edge. The pressure forces push the airfoil back.

• Wave Drag: Shock waves form over the airfoil, converting momentum of the flow into heat. The resulting rate of change of momentum causes drag.

Page 29: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Particles awayfrom theairfoil moveunhindered.

Particles near theairfoil stick to thesurface, and try toslow down thenearby particles.

A tug of war results - airfoil is dragged back with the flow.

Skin Friction

This region of lowspeed flow is calledthe boundary layer.

Page 30: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Laminar Flow

Streamlines move in an orderly fashion - layer by layer.The mixing between layers is due to molecular motion.Laminar mixing takes place very slowly.Drag per unit area is proportional to the slope of the velocity profile at the wall. In laminar flow, drag is small.

Airfoil SurfaceThis slope determines drag.

Page 31: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

Turbulent Flow

Airfoil Surface

Turbulent flow is highly unsteady, three-dimensional, andchaotic. It can still be viewed in a time-averaged manner.

For example, at each point in the flow, we can measure velocities once every millisecond to collect 1000 samples and and average it.

Page 32: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

“Time-Averaged” Turbulent Flow

Velocity varies rapidly near the wall due to increased mixing.The slope is higher. Drag is higher.

Page 33: Wind Engineering Module 3.1 Lakshmi Sankar Recap In module 1.1, we looked at the course objectives, deliverables, and the t-square web site. In module

In summary...

• Laminar flows have a low drag.• Turbulent flows have a high drag.• The region where the flow changes from laminar

to turbulent flow is called transition zone or transition region.

• If we can postpone the transition as far back on the airfoil as we can, we will get the lowest drag.

• Ideally, the entire flow should be kept laminar.