willingness to pay for healthcare€¦ · * eb –enumeration block, hh - household....
TRANSCRIPT
Willingness to pay for Healthcare in Sarawak
More Than RM1?
30/10/2017 1
Dr Azizah Azhar (PKB Sri Aman)Prof. Dr Md Mizanur Rahman (UNIMAS)
Introduction
• How much value is put on health care service by the public?
• Are they willing to pay more than RM 1 for primary health care service in outpatient clinics?
30/10/2017 2
Introduction (2)
• Assess public support towards health care funding
• Objectives
– To determine the public willingness to pay for primary health care services (payment per visit)
– To identify factors that influencing willingness to pay for primary health care services
30/10/2017 3
Methodology
Cross sectional study quantitative study
Multistage cluster sampling
Contingent valuation method
Face to face questionnaire assisted interview
30/10/2017 4
Sarawak
Southern Zone Central Zone Northern Zone
Kuching Division Sibu Division Limbang Division
Kuching Lundu Sibu Selangau Limbang Lawas
8 EB 8 EB 8 EB 8 EB 8 EB 8 EB
211 HH 211 HH 211 HH 211 HH 211 HH 211 HH
* EB –enumeration block, HH - household
Socio-Demographic Characteristics
Variables Frequency Percentage
Age (years)
<25 199 19.5
25-34 314 30.8
35-44 238 23.4
45-54 140 13.8
≥55 127 12.5
Mean (SD) = 36.61(13.30)
years
Minimum =18 years, Maximum= 79 years
Gender
Female 592 58.2
Male 426 41.8
Ethnicity
Iban 490 48.1
Malay 420 41.3
Other Bumiputera 60 5.9
Chinese 48 4.7
6
32%
31%
37%
Participants Distribution
Kuching
Sibu
Limbang
30/10/2017 7
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (2)
Single/Divorced 32%
Married 68%
Marital Status
30/10/2017 8
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (3)
36%
48%
16%
Family Size
2 or less
3 to 5
6 or more
30/10/2017 9
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (4)
Mean (SD)= 3.55 (1.99) Minimum= 1 member, Maximum = 13 members
120
201
486
211
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
No Schooling Primary Secondary Tertiary
No Schooling Primary Secondary Tertiary
30/10/2017 10
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (5)Level of Education
11.8 %
19.7%
47.7%
20.7%
490
414
114
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
≤ 800
801-3000
>3000
Household Income (MYR)
≤ 800
801-3000
>3000
30/10/2017 11Median = MYR 900Minimum= MYR 50, Maximum= MYR 13000
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (6)
(48.1%)
(40.7%)
(11.2%)
35%
11%22%
20%
12%
Occupation
Not working
Farming
Civil servants
Private job
Others
30/10/2017 12
Socio-Demographic Characteristics (7)
Preferred place of
treatment
Frequency Percentage
Government Clinic 833 81.8
Government Emergency
Department
51 5.0
Private Facilities 134 13.2
13
Preferred place of treatment
Distribution of Perception of Health Care Delivery
30/10/2017 14
52%
48%
Perception of Health Care Delivery
Good
Poor
409
30/10/2017 15
Willingness To Pay (WTP)
60%
40%
Willingness to pay distribution
Agree
Disagree(409)
79%
18%
3%
Reasons Not Willing to Pay
Unable toafford
It’s government responsibility Others
(609)
Willingness To Pay (WTP)
Variables Frequency
n=609
Percentage
Amount WTP (RM)
5-10 519 51.0
11-20 155 15.2
21-30 93 9.1
31-40 66 6.5
41-50 47 4.6
51-60 17 1.7
Other amounts (RM)
Less than 5 72 7.1
61-100 8 0.8
300 1 0.1
Yea-saying 9 0.9
16
Median= RM 5.40
Factors Affecting WTP Variables Model 1
Not WTP or Yes
βOR
(95% CI)
Residence
Urban (ref) - -
Rural -0.38* 0.69(0.51, 0.91)
Age (years)
<25 (ref) - -
25-34 -0.26 0.77(0.52,1.15)
35-44 -0.57** 0.57(0.37,0.86)
45-54 -0.44 0.65(0.40,1.03)
≥55 -0.21 0.81(0.50, 1.31)
Marital status
Single (ref) - -
Married 0.43** 1.54(1.16,2.04)
17
Factors Affecting WTP Variables Not WTP or WTP
βOR
(95% CI)
Occupation
Not working (ref) - -
Farmer -0.30 0.74(0.89, 2.06)
Civil Servants -1.00*** 0.37(1.60, 4.64)
Private Sector 0.65*** 1.91(1.20-3.06)
Others 0.52* 1.68(1.04, 2.71)
Health Care Provider Preferred
Government (ref) - -
Private -0.49* 0.61(0.42,0.89)
Perception of HC Delivery 0.17* 1.19(1.01, 1.40)
Constant 0.18 0.43
n 1018
Model Chi Square (df) 98.32 (12)***
Goodness of fit > 0.05
Ref Reference category 18*p< 0.05; **p< 0.01;***p< 0.001
Discussion
• Aizuddin et al. (2011) -3/4 who were farmers in Selangor.
• Mean ; RM 4.43 (government)
»RM 5.62 (private)
• Many study focus in willingness to pay for health insurance, limited on payment per visit
• Limitation
– Yea saying, anchor bias, protest no
•30/10/2017 19
• Increasing the amount of payment during registration can be one of the feasible options apart from introducing health care insurance.
• Improving the delivery of health care and the quality of PHC service especially in government setting – may encourage more public to willing to pay
30/10/2017 20
Recommendation
References
• Aizuddin, A., Hod, R., Rizal, A., Yon, R., & Al Junid, S. (2011). Ability and Willingness to Pay for Health Care and Contribute To National Healthcare Financing Scheme Among Farmers in Selangor. Journal of Community Health, 17(1), 56–63.
30/10/2017 21
Thank You
30/10/2017 22