wildland fire emissions study – phase 2 for wrap fejf meeting research in progress by the camfer...
DESCRIPTION
U.C. Berkeley –3 User Interface Vegetation Crosswalk Fuel Models Emission Estimation Fuel Loading Fuel Consumption Vegetation Coverage User Parameters Sum Modular System Fire History Map Emissions ReportingTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2
For WRAP FEJF Meeting
Research in progress by the CAMFER fire group:Peng Gong, Ruiliang Pu, Presented by Nick Clinton
![Page 2: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
U.C. Berkeley –2
Purpose“…to develop a method for producing
coherent, consistent, spatially and temporally resolved GIS based emission estimates for wildfire and prescribed burning.”
![Page 3: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
U.C. Berkeley –3
User Interface
VegetationCrosswalk
FuelModels
EmissionEstimation
Fuel Loading
FuelConsumption
VegetationCoverage
UserParameters
Sum
Modular SystemFire History
Map
EmissionsReporting
![Page 4: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Vegetation Data
• The GAP vegetation layer– Statewide coverage– Less complex than
other vegetation layers such as CALVEG
– 1990 source data
![Page 5: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
National Inputs• The spatial inputs are the
NFDRS fuel model grid (seen left) and a grid of remotely sensed fire detections (both 1km resolution).
• Utilizes the same emissions equations as with polygon processing.
• Requires crosswalk of FOFEM fuel models to NFDRS fuel models (proof of concept).
![Page 6: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Fire History – Agency Data
• CDF fire polygons• Historical database• Completeness??• Remote sensing
based fire map
![Page 7: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
AlgorithmsA. Hotspot Detection (modified to CCRS’)
Y ES
YES
YES
NO
NO
NO
AVHRR data preparation
Algorithm applied to each pixel
Test # 1T3 > 315 K?
Test # 2T3 –T4>=14 K?
Test # 3T4>=260 K?
Fire clear pixels
Eliminate cloudy pixel
Eliminate warm background, e.g., bare soil
![Page 8: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Test # 4Contextual info
R2<=30%?R2<=8 neighb P ave-1?T3>8 neighb P ave+5?
Test # 5Wild land cover types?
Test # 8|R1-R2|>1%?
Test # 7R1+R2<=75%?
Test # 6T4-T5<4.0 K and
T3-T4>=19 K?
Test # 9One of neighbor P passes
the 8 tests above?
True fire pixels False fire pixels
Eliminate highly reflecting clouds & surface and warm background
Eliminate urban, agriculture,dune, desert, water body
Eliminate single fire pixel
Eliminate sunglint pixels
Eliminate highly reflecting clouds & surface
Eliminate thin clouds with warm background
Single date fire mask
![Page 9: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
AlgorithmsB. Burnt Scar mapping (modified to CCRS’ HANDS) with - Two NDVI composites of an interesting interval - One corresponding hotspot composite (fire mask) Step 1. Normalize NDVIpost to NDVIpre
normalized NDVIpost = Ratio.C * NDVIpost
Step 2. Calculate NDVI differencenormalized NDVIpost – NDVIpre
Step 3. Confirm hotspot pixels using NDVI difference (CBP)
,.NDVIpostofmeanNDVIpreofmeanCRatio
![Page 10: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Fire History – RS Data
• Overlay of CDF and CAMFER data
• 1996 and 1999 (big fire years)
![Page 12: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Overlay of CDF and CAMFER
![Page 13: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Quantitative Comparison
![Page 14: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• Variation in mapping success between different ecosystem types.
• The amount of variation differs between methods (monthly or annual differencing), and between years.
• In general, the CAMFER method is more successful in the forest type.
![Page 15: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Overlay of CDF and CAMFER• RED is now RS
detections. Green is Jepson ecoregion
• Lambert Conformal Conic Projection
• No Post-processing (filtering, nearest neighbor relationship to hotspots)
• Slightly reduced accuracy
• Potential for more data refinement by incorporating hotspots…
![Page 16: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Overlay of CDF and CAMFER
• Green is annual NDVI differencing.
• Blue is monthly NDVI differencing
• Neither method is effective in detecting the entire burn area
![Page 17: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Overlay of CDF and CAMFER
• Hotspots (Red) overlaid on the monthly and annual NDVI differencing
• Increase or at least negligible decrease in NDVI, especially over an annual time scale
• Problems with temporal resolution in hotspot detection
• Potential for more dynamic thresholding in burn scar mapping?
![Page 18: Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire…](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062911/5a4d1c0b7f8b9ab0599f403d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Temporal Decomposition of RS Data
• Remotely sensed burn scar polygons can be decomposed to daily polygons based on a nearest neighbor relationship using hot spot detections
• Facilitates temporal allocation of emissions
• Useful to dispersion modeling, emissions tracking