why monte-carlo ?

45
Jean Favier LAPP CERN Ph ysics and soft meeting 2 3/04/04 Why Monte-Carlo ? To understand and separate influences of parameters (ex: fog d, distorsions,m.i.p grain density) on efficiency To guide the optimization of reconstruction programs To evaluate track efficiency and systematics errors for different topological conditions ECC is the basic OPERA detector , but it is the only one escaping Monte-Carlo !

Upload: alvin-grant

Post on 03-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Why Monte-Carlo ?. To understand and separate influences of parameters (ex: fog d, distorsions,m.i.p grain density) on efficiency To guide the optimization of reconstruction programs To evaluate track efficiency and systematics errors for different topological conditions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Why Monte-Carlo ?• To understand and separate influences of

parameters (ex: fog d, distorsions,m.i.p grain density) on efficiency

• To guide the optimization of reconstruction programs

• To evaluate track efficiency and systematics errors for different topological conditions

• ECC is the basic OPERA detector , but it is the only one escaping Monte-Carlo !

Page 2: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

• THEN:The lack of data for various conditions ( particle type, angles, energies, fog densities, ambiant radioactivity integration times, etc) and poor statistics make difficult the reconstruction programs optimization.

• The large feed-back time between beam tests and scanning

• It was attracting to reproduce emulsions data by Monte-Carlo, as for the other detectors

Page 3: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

• Genima GEN : GEANT3 generation of - single track (1 single field 200x200 2 , double layer emulsion set-up) - or neutrino, showers events in a complete brick set-up. - The correct grain density is set by randomly eliminating some

GEANT track hits to obtain the m.i.p density at : 32IMA: single “classico” FORTRAN program: - read GEANT hits - add background fog - constructs the 32 images of grains, fog,etc present in the 2 emulsion

layers NOW 128x128 pixels instead of 1024x1024 : factor 64 in computing time !!!

-Artificial increase of depth of field to approximate reality - clusterises the images pixels NOW Digital Filter - finds micro-track NOW cut >= 8 hits to accept - finds base-track

Page 4: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

ccd plane

Focused

plane

Grain plane

d=3.254 mm d=200 mm

r=6mm

The systeme objective-ccd (in red) can move along the optical axis: we keep 16

tomographic planes ; is defined by objective characteristics

The virtual microscope

objective

Page 5: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

IMA : makes pictures

• For each “grain” x,y,z we calculate the intercepted surface by a conical prolongation , isolating the surface S of pixels to “dark”. The cone aperture is determined by the lense N.A (numerical aperture):

= arcsin(N.A/nrefr )

• Pixels are filled with grey in each of the 16 picture planes; grey density varies with 1 / S and e-d/ ( is an effective emulsion attenuation lenghth)

Page 6: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Fog and background

• Fog is randomly generated as single grain with a density of 8 grains/ (10 )3

• Album of real emulsions can be used also (radioactivity fossiles tracks)

Page 7: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 8: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 9: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 10: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

Page 11: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 12: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 13: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 14: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 15: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 16: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 17: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 18: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 19: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 20: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 21: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 22: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Emulsion simulation

• 16 images

Page 23: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Performances of the European Scanning SystemPerformances of the European Scanning System

Efficiency

Efficiency is being estimated by European laboratories by using plates from a common test exposure

8 plates in contact were exposed to a beam

The brick was rotated in 14 different positions in order to test the angular dependency of efficiency

Page 24: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Performances of the European Scanning SystemPerformances of the European Scanning System

Purity

Purity is being estimated by European laboratories measuring plates from a common reference batch with the same parameters used to measure efficiency

Tracks found by the scanning system in a few cm2 are manually checkedin order to evaluate the density of fake tracks

Density of fake tracks is less than 1/cm2

Page 25: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Performances of the European Scanning SystemPerformances of the European Scanning System

Sy = 0

Sy = -0.180

Base-track

Microtrack

6/7 plates4 averages

cutBkgnd = 1 fake/cm2

Efficiency

Salerno

Page 26: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Offline cut: < -6.667 + 0.4167PH

Efficiency

Napoli

Page 27: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

R&D Meeting, LNGS, 4th October 2004

Base-track efficiency Jun. 04 reference brick with leadsheets 18 – 25

= N6

N5 + N6

volume 1: sheets 20 – 25volume 2: sheets 19 – 24volume 3: sheets 18 – 23

6 samples of tracks( external sheets only )

Bari

Page 28: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Efficiency

Neuchatel

Page 29: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Volume tracks Base tracks efficiency vs peaks (averaged over 7 plates)

Error bars = 1 spread of 7 plate efficiencies

Red: y 0 mrad

Black: y 200 mrad

Bologna

Page 30: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Scanning performanceBasetracks MIC1 (SmartTracker6)

Dry objective

Bern

Page 31: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Scanning performanceBasetracks MIC2 (SmartTracker7)

Dry objective

Bern

Page 32: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

• How fog can influence efficiency ?- Fog effects will be higher at large angle where the

sensible volume around the track is higher- infection of a good cluster: the resulting barycentre

becomes out of association: the hits number can go down from 6 to 5

- Deformations of good clusters by a fog one can produce a deterioration of qui2

- Oppositely, on a 5 hits track, one fog cluster can, by luck, occupy the sixth rank, so the track will be accepted

Page 33: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 34: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Base-track efficiency

Fog effect

Page 35: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 36: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Grain

density

Fog=0 (preliminary)

Nhit 6

Nhit 5

Page 37: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

• Boliden Lead + Ca (NGL washed by Goslar)• CERN refreshed emulsion (FD (6.3 + 0.5)g/(m)• Spider packing• Delrin cover and side protection• 35°C in the oven (1 year)

FD (6.8 + 0.5)g/(10m)3

Long term test using PbCa (11/2004 11/2005)

20 30 40 50 600

50

100

150

200

Track grains/100 m

Emulsion sensitivity

Page 38: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

• Distortion

It is simulated by random rotation (0 to max) of the

microtracks ,leaving fixed the intercept with the basis; we varied max from 0 to 40 mrad

Emulsion layer 1 basis

Page 39: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 40: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 41: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 42: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 43: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 44: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04

Page 45: Why Monte-Carlo ?

Jean Favier LAPP CERN Physics and soft meeting 23/04/04