why do we need pdvac? what activities will pdvac oversee?€¦ · advising who on ways to improve...
TRANSCRIPT
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
1
Why do we need PDVAC?
What activities will PDVAC
oversee?
Vasee Moorthy MRCP PhD
WHO Initiative for Vaccine Research,
Dept. Of Immunization, Vaccines & Biologicals,
Geneva
2
Proposed
Areas of Work,
Approaches
and,
Processes
Strategic Directions for Vaccine Research
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
2
3
Current
status DOV
GOAL
GAP
Current
status DOV
GOAL
GAP PRODUCT
DEVELOPMENT
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
3
Where can WHO's
vaccine research contribute ?
Assess and/or develop strategies/
approaches to expand coverage
and impact and improve delivery of
vaccines
Contribute to development/availability of
new or better vaccines/delivery
systems to address remaining BoD
Generate and/or synthesize and appraise
evidence for robust policy making
Vac
cin
es/p
rod
uct
s
licen
sed
an
d c
urr
entl
y in
use
Can
did
ate
vacc
ines
/ p
rod
uct
s u
nd
er
dev
elo
pm
ent
6
Gap in our processes identified: overseeing activities
related to upstream vaccine R&D
PDVAC convened during 2014: up to 15 members (13 constituted)
“The Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee
(PDVAC) will provide strategic advice and recommendations to
WHO related to vaccines at the Phase 2 stage of clinical evaluation
or earlier. The committee’s remit is for disease areas where there is
substantial disease burden in low and middle income countries, no
vaccines or products currently exist, and there is some ongoing
product development activity which may benefit from guidance from
WHO. This committee may also have a role where first generation
vaccines are licensed but development of improved second
generation products is a priority for WHO.”
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
4
7
PDVAC terms of reference
This committee will be asked to advise on the following areas:
“scanning the horizon” to identify new diseases where there is sufficient priority for WHO to
initiate activities;
consensus building for vaccine trial endpoints for vaccine policy decision making;
initiating roadmap development;
prioritizing and advising on development of WHO preferred product characteristics to guide
target product profiles in use by vaccine manufacturers and funding agencies;
reviewing other WHO products, including methods, protocols, tools and approaches for
accelerating product development;
stimulating research by partners in line with WHO priorities; and
advising WHO on ways to improve public access to information about products in
development.
8
Pathways for WHO Recommendations on
Vaccine Use
SAGE
Relevant existing
technical advisory
committee
Background
Paper Global Advisory
Committee on
Vaccine Safety
Expert committee
on Biological
Standardization
Regional TAGS
Regional
consultations
WHO
Position Paper
WHO DG
Secretariat
SAGE
working group
Input
Request for review of
evidence
Country
Decision
making
Recommendations
Other relevant non immunization
related WHO policy
recommendation making body
Immunization and
Vaccines related
Implementation
Research Advisory
Committee
Industry and
other partners
Product Development for
Vaccines Advisory
Committee
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
5
9
MODEL:
– Identify partner often from Product Development Partnership
– Provide template
– Submitted pipeline analysis is reviewed by WHO
– Then submitted to committee members
– All will be published on PDVAC website after each meeting
– Core diseases will be reviewed each year including HIV, TB,
malaria
– Certain diseases will be reviewed less often than annually eg,
some pathogen areas with either small disease burden or little
activity.
Pipeline analyses
10
This year the following 19 pathogen specific areas were
requested as pipeline analyses:
HIV, Tuberculosis, Malaria,
Universal influenza, RSV
Group A Streptococcus, S. pneumoniae
Upstream rotavirus, E.coli, Shigella, Paratyphoid, Non-typhoidal
salmonella, campylobacter, norovirus
HSV, Chagas, Leishmaniasis, Schistosomiasis, Human Hookworm
Pipeline analyses
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
6
11
Objectives
Review the state of progress and challenges of vaccine research
and development and the vaccine pipeline for selected pathogens
and disease areas
Prioritize and rank disease areas where clinical endpoints
consultations and Preferred Product Characteristics (PPCs) should
be developed.
Provide advice and recommendations to WHO on what could be its
specific priorities and role related to promoting and enabling the
development of vaccines for selected pathogens
12
Expected outcomes:
Recommendations for prioritization of WHO’s work
related to early stage vaccine R&D
Consensus reached on a ranking of disease areas
where clinical endpoints consultations and vaccine
Preferred Product Characteristics (PPCs) should be
developed.
Plan of further action 2014-2015 (pending
resources)
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
7
WHO Activities to encourage and
accelerate development of vaccines in early development
»TRIAL DESIGN: Consensus-building on key
endpoints for vaccine evaluation, including
case definitions (sometimes analysis methods)
» Global R&D roadmaps including strategic goals
to articulate priority unmet public health
needs
» Preferred Product Characteristics to
guide TPP processes
Provision of Trial Design Guidance in Novel
Vaccines Area
Complex Pathology?
Multiple Disease
Manifestations?
Lack of Consensus
on Choice of Endpoints?
Lack of existing
regulatory standards?
Prioritized vs other
requests to WHO?
Need Identified and Prioritized
Initiate Consensus-Building
Coordinate Provision
of Guidance at Phase 2b-3 stage
Forms Part of Consultation Process
for Later Regulatory Standards
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
8
Guidance on Clinical Evaluation
of Dengue & Malaria Vaccines
Broad
Based
Clinical
Consultation
Regulatory
Consultations
Technical
Report
Series …
•Primary clinical endpoints agreed: in both cases
“non-severe” endpoints were accepted as primary
•Safety: 2-3 years and greater follow-up needed
before consideration of WHO policy
recommendations
2 Strategic goals
reflecting priority unmet
public health needs to be
met by vaccines
13 priority activity areas
spanning research,
vaccine development,
key capacities, policy
and commercialization
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
9
17
Preferred Product Characteristics:
What they are & what they are not
What they are
Guidance from WHO for vaccine developers to take into account
when designing vaccines and trials at early stage of vaccine R&D
Will need to change in line with the scientific state-of-the-art and
needs of country programmes (with ongoing review process)
What they are not
They are not static exit criteria. Innovation is encouraged and
harnessed to meet public health needs
They do not replace standard policy or PQ processes
18
Preclinical
Development
Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3
Prequalification
Policy
Recommendations
Linking Vaccine R&D & Public Health:
Preferred Product Characteristics (PPC)
PPC
World Health Organization 17 September, 2014
10
19
Heading in TPP
documents
Guidance for
developers at early
stages
Evidence-based public
health recommendation
process
Assessment of
licensed vaccines for
possible
Prequalification
Indication PPC SAGE PQ team
Target population
& immunization
strategies &
schedules
PPC SAGE PQ team
Clinical
development
Pathways
PPC SAGE PQ team
Safety PPC GACVS & SAGE PQ team
Efficacy, including
endpoints, case
definitions,
PPC SAGE PQ team
Concomitant use PPC SAGE PQ team
Presentation VPPAG PSPQ
Packaging &
inserts
VPPAG PSPQ
Formulation &
Thermostability
VPPAG PSPQ
Labelling & VVM VPPAG PSPQ
20
ALL THE MAJOR PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT
PARTNERSHIPS WORKING IN VACCINES
ENGAGEMENT FROM INDUSTRY & MANY
ACADEMIC GROUPS
INTEREST FROM R&D STAKEHOLDERS
HELP FROM WHO CCs (Johns Hopkins, UTMB,
Geneva University Hospital)
Zarifah Reed, Uli Fruth
THANK YOU