why do monitoring projects succeed or fail? l.m. reid. 2001. the epidemiology of monitoring. j. awra...

19
Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815

Post on 21-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail?

L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820.

Page 2: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Design Problems Problems are inherent in the plan No amount of hard work can salvage

Procedural Problems Problems in execution sabotage good design

Page 3: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Design

1. Monitoring plan cannot measure what is needed

Page 4: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Design

2. Study too short

Page 5: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Design

3. Inadequate problem identification or analysis

Page 6: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Design

4. Fundamental misunderstanding of the system

Page 7: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Design

5. Statistically weak design

Page 8: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

6. Lack of training and/or enthusiasm in field staff

Page 9: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

1/4/

1996

2/4/

1996

3/4/

1996

4/4/

1996

5/4/

1996

6/4/

1996

7/4/

1996

8/4/

1996

9/4/

1996

10/4

/199

6

11/4

/199

6

12/4

/199

6

TK

N C

on

ce

ntr

ati

on

(m

g/L

)

Top 12 reasons for failure – Procedural

7. Failure to evaluate data regularly

?

?

Page 10: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

8. Failure to collect collateral information

Page 11: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

9. Bad or misunderstood technology

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1

Tu

rbid

ity

(NT

U)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Flo

w (

cfs)

Turbidity

Flow

Page 12: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

10. Personnel change

Page 13: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

11. Lack of institutional integration

Page 14: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Top 12 reasons for failure - Procedural

12. Protocol changes

Page 15: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

Procedural problems can be addressed by training, good management, and $$,

but

design problems may doom a project from the start

Top 12 reasons for failure

Page 16: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

9 Key Elements addressed satisfactorily

Ingredients for success

Page 17: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

1. Avoid causes of failure #1 – 12

2. Accurate identification of pollutants and sources measure the right pollutant at the right time in the right place

3. Small, focused effort (avoid large diverse watershed, gradual random implementation)

4. Good monitoring design

Ingredients for success

Page 18: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

5. Attention to procedural issues

6. Strong, unified project leadership

7. Control over schedule of implementation

8. Effective tracking of land use and land treatment

activities

Ingredients for success

Page 19: Why Do Monitoring Projects Succeed or Fail? L.M. Reid. 2001. The epidemiology of monitoring. J. AWRA 37(4):815-820

9. Strong feedback between monitoring and implementation throughout the project

10. Effective institutional coordination

11. Priority and time given to effective evaluation, reporting and communication of project results

12. Appropriate funding (amount & duration)

Ingredients for success