why b physics at pp collider

44
B physics at the Tevatron S. Donati University and INFN Pisa April 2003 Meeting of the American Physical Society

Upload: betty

Post on 13-Jan-2016

28 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

B physics at the Tevatron S. Donati University and INFN Pisa April 2003 Meeting of the American Physical Society. Why B physics at pp collider. Open wide spectrum of B hadrons B  , B 0 , B s , B c ,  b ,  b bb cross section is 50-100 m b - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Why B physics at pp collider

B physics at the Tevatron

S. Donati University and INFN Pisa

April 2003 Meeting of the American Physical Society

Page 2: Why B physics at pp collider

Why B physics at pp collider

CDFCLEO

Open wide spectrum of B hadrons B, B0, Bs, Bc, b, b

bb cross section is 50-100 b ~O(105) larger than @(4S)/Z0

BUT: B hadrons are hidden in a 103

largerbackground (inelastic(pp) 50 mb)

Events more complicated than at (4S)

Crucial detector components:- Tracking system Excellent pt resolution/Vertexing- Trigger Large bandwidth Strong background reduction- Particle identification

CLEO

Page 3: Why B physics at pp collider

Tevatron pp colliderMain Injector (new injection stage for

Tevatron)

Ability to accelerate and deliver higher intensity of protons

More efficient anti-proton production

Collision rate: 396 ns crossing time

(36x36 bunches) ~ 2M collisions/sec

Center of Mass energy: 1.96 TeV

Today: luminosity ~4.0 x 1031 cm-2s-1

4 to 7 pb-1/week delivered

Goal: luminosity: ~1032 cm-2s-1

16 pb-1/week delivered

In this talk: results with 70 pb-1 for CDF and 40 pb-1 for D0

CDF Integrated Luminosity

Mar 02

Jan 03

130 pb-1 (delivered)

100 pb-1 (to tape)

B/Charm: ~ 70 pb-1

commiss

Page 4: Why B physics at pp collider

CDF Detector in Run II

Tracking System - 3D Silicon Tracker (up to ||~2)

- Faster Drift ChamberTime-of-Flight (particle ID) Plug and Forward Calorimeters DAQ & Trigger system (Online Silicon Vertex Tracker: trigger on displaced vertices, first time at hadron collider)

Completely New:

Inherited from Run I:Central Calorimeter (||<1) Solenoid (1.4T)

Muon system (extended to ||

~1.5)

Partially New:

Page 5: Why B physics at pp collider

D0 detector in Run II

Page 6: Why B physics at pp collider

B Triggers and data samplesDisplaced trk + lepton (e, )IP(trk) > 120m

Pt(lepton) > 4 GeV

Semileptonic modes

2-Track Trig.Pt(trk) > 2 GeV

IP(trk) > 100 m

Fully hadronic modes

Di-Muon (J/)Pt() > 1.5 GeV (CDF)

J/ modes down to low Pt(J/) (~ 0 GeV)

- CP violation

- Masses, lifetimes

- Quarkonia, rare decays

- High statistics lifetime

- Sample for tagging

studies, mixing

- BS mixing

- CP asymmetry in 2-body charmless decays

(New in CDF/Short term upgrade in D0)

(Conventional)

Primary Vertex

Secondary Vertex

d = impact parameter

BDecay Length

Lxy

Lxy 450m

PT(B) 5 GeV

Page 7: Why B physics at pp collider

Sanity check with

known signals:

D0 and

Detector calibration:p scale & B-field

correction

Raw tracks

Add B scale correction

Tune missing material

Correct for material in GEANT

1S

2S

3S

MASS SCALE: MCDF = MPDG-M(Pt)

Use J/ to correct for B field and energy loss:

(scale)/scale ~ 0.02%

D0

Page 8: Why B physics at pp collider

Mass measurementsCDF mass (only~20

pb-1)

B+ 5280.6 1.7 1.1 0.8

Bd5279.81 1.9 1.4 0.2

Bs5360.3 3.8 -2.1

(2S) 3686.43 0.54 0.9

CDF

PDGσ

Δ

Ds± - D± mass

differenceBoth D (KK)

m = 99.28 ± 0.43 ± 0.27MeV

PDG: 99.2 ± 0.5 MeV (CLEO2, E691)

Systematics dominated by background modeling

M(Bs) is already the second best in the world (after CDF RunI)

FIRST CDFII

PAPER

2.12.9

See A. Korn’s talk

Page 9: Why B physics at pp collider

Background is subtracted

Conventional way to B: J/

L ~ 40 pb-1

75k J/

CDF triggers on stopped J/ : pt() 1.5 GeV/c, pt(J/) 0

CDF can measure cross section down to pT = 0 (first

at hadron collider)

(ppJ/; pT>0; ||<0.6) =

240 1 (stat) 35/28(syst) nb

See Y. Gotra’s Talk

Page 10: Why B physics at pp collider

First step: Inclusive B J/X Lifetime

Estimate Estimate B B through through

)(

TT

xyBPFP

ML

MCMC

CDF July 2002 (18 pb-1): =1.5260.0340.035 ps

D0 March 2003 (40 pb-1): =1.5610.0240.074 ps

PDG 2002: = 1.674 0.018

D0 Run II Preliminary

B

D0 Run II Preliminary

J/

Page 11: Why B physics at pp collider

B LifetimesHeavy Quark Expansionpredicts the lifetimes

for

different B hadron species

(Bc) << (b0) ~ (b)

< (B0) ~ (Bs) < (B-)

< (b-) < (b)

– (B+)/(B0) = 1.03-1.07

– (Bs)/(B0) = 1.00 + 0.01

– (b)/(B0) = 0.9-1.0

B+/B0 and Bs/B0 measurements agree with prediction

Small discrepancy for b

lifetimes

– LEP + CDF Run I

Page 12: Why B physics at pp collider

Exclusive B J/KLifetime (1)

Use exclusively reconstructed B B+ J/ K+

B0 J/ K0* (K0* K)

Bs J/ ( KK)

bJ/ (p)

Simultaneous fitting of

MB: Extract signal fraction

ct: Extract the lifetime

CDF March 2003 (70 pb-1): (B+ )=1.570.070.02 ps

D0 March 2003 (40 pb-1): (B+ )=1.76 0.24 ps

Page 13: Why B physics at pp collider

Exclusive B J/K lifetime (2)

(Bs Unique to Tevatron)

CDF Preliminary

B+ 1.57 0.07 0.02

(ps)

Bd1.42 0.09 0.02

(ps)

Bs1.26 0.2 0.02

(ps)

Systemat. & statist. errors already @ Run I level

Use control channels: Bu J/ K+

and Bd J/ K0*

Measurement limited only by statistics

Important for simultaneous measurement

)τ(B)τ(B

d

s

)τ(B)τ(B

d

s

)τ(B)τ(B

d

= 0.89 0.15

= 1.11 0.09 c, [cm]See K. Anikeev’s Talk

Page 14: Why B physics at pp collider

CDF: largest fully reconstructedsample in the world: 74 11 evts Yield/Lumi = 2 x RunI

CP asymmetry measures the weak phase of Vts (angle s = 2s )Expected to be very small: sin(2s ) O() 0.03Complicated analysis: requires xs and angular analysis to disentangle CP even/odd final statesCDF reach : sin(2 s )0.1 with 2fb–1 (0.03-0.06 with 10fb–1)

If asymmetry observed with 2fb–1 signal for NEW Physics

We also want to measure the lifetime difference: s = BsH- Bs

L

Current limit (LEP): s / s <0.31 (S.M.: = 0.05 - 0.20)

Physics with B0s J/

Page 15: Why B physics at pp collider

More about BJ/ signals

0bJ/ Br.Ratio and Lifetime meas. in

progress (see T. Yamashita, R. Madrak’s Talk)

CDF

D0

B0J/K0s

CDF~220 events

0bJ/

First steps towards sin(2)

Measurement

Page 16: Why B physics at pp collider

B+/B0 from lepton+displaced track

CDF: high statistics semileptonic B samplesExcellent calibration samples for B+/B0 lifetime,tagging and B0 mixing BlD0X (D0K): ~10,000 eventsBlD*+X (D*+D0): ~1,500 eventsBlD+X (D+K): ~5,000 events

Run II yieldssignificantly larger,

lower lepton pt threshold possible

thanks to i.ptrigger

CDF CDF CDF

Page 17: Why B physics at pp collider

Yield/Lumi ~ Run I x 3 S/N ~ Run I x 2

BS from lepton + displaced track

HIGH STATISTICS SAMPLE:

• Inclusive lifetime:

• Mixing (moderate xs):

good S/N, limited time resolution: back-up sample

Bs Dsl [] l [[KK] ]l ONLY @ Tevatron

Efficiency vs c

MC

AR

BIT

RA

RY

UN

ITS

Systematics of trigger bias

)τ(B)τ(B

d

s

385 22 Ds

(muon only)

Page 18: Why B physics at pp collider

b from lepton+displaced track

• Branching Ratio

• Measure

Q2 = m(l)

important for theory

Experimental challenge:

disentangle from decays through excited baryons

b cl [pK] l

Yield/Lumi = 4 x RunI

S/N ~ 2 x Run I

2dQdΓ

Γ1

Time of flight

dE/dx +

Page 19: Why B physics at pp collider

Physics with the hadronic trigger

Reconstructed large (0.5M) D mesons:D K, D0 K, D* D0, Ds D0 KK, D0 See K. Stenson’s (Charm Physics review), C. Chen (D x-section), S. Vallecorsa (D Cabibbo supp. decays), M. Campanelli (D orb. excited states) talks for CDF Charm results

D’s from Primary Vertex have d 0

Direct Charm

D0K 86.5 0.4 %

(stat)

D*D0 87.6 1.1 % (stat)

DK 89.1 0.4 %

(stat)

Ds 72.4 3.4 % (stat)

B fraction 10 - 20

%

D mesons I.P. (d) distribution

D

d(D)

D

B

CDF: open access to fully hadronic D and B signals

Page 20: Why B physics at pp collider

Ingredients for B0s mixing

Nunmix(t) – Nmix(t)

Nunmix(t) + Nmix(t)= Dcos(mst)Amix(t) =

1. Reconstruct the final state (use fully rec. B0s → D-

s

π+(3π))with good S/B (thanks to precise tracking, vertexing, PID)

60 fs (SVX II detector)45 fs (also Layer 00 is used)

3. Identify the flavor of Bs at production: B-flavor tagging algorithms

2. Measure proper decay time: ; = PT(B) / M(B) c = Lxy

Error on B momentum, ~ 15% (semileptonic)negligible (~ 0.5%) forfully reconstructed final states

Current limit:

ms 14.4 ps-1

ms/md

Page 21: Why B physics at pp collider

First steps towards B0s mixing in

CDF Bs Ds

(*) [] [[KK] ]

Fully reconstructed

Bs is consistent with

Bd D control sample

Collect more data and understand tagging

See S. DaRonco’s Talk

Page 22: Why B physics at pp collider

B Flavor Tagging

OST (opposite side tagging): B’s produced in pairs measure flavor of opposite B

“Identify the flavor of B at production”

JETQ: sign of the weighted average charge of opposite B-JetSLT: identify the soft lepton from semileptonic decay of opposite BSST (same side tagging):

B0 (B0) is likely to be accompanied close by a + ()

Search for the track with minimum PTREL

Figure of merit:

= efficiency ;

Effective size of sample is reduced by D2

D = “Dilution” = 1 – 2Pmistag

D2 “tagging effectiveness” 2%

bd

du

u

B0

+

Page 23: Why B physics at pp collider

NEW in CDF: “Kaon b-taggers”• Exploit K/ separation of new TOF

• Well suited for strange B mesons

Same Side K: a B0s (B0

s) is likely to be accompanied close by a K+ (K) from fragmentation

bs

su

u

B0s

K+

Jet charge tag Muon tag

63.0 3.6 %

= 8.3 1.9%

D=15.8 8.3 % D=44.4 21.1 %

2.4 1.7% 3.3 1.8 %

D0 Run II Preliminary

For CDF studies see A. Ratikin and T. Moulik’s Talks

Opposite Side K: due to bcs it is more likely that a B meson contains in final state a K than a K+ to identify a B0

s look for a K from the decay of the opposite B

Page 24: Why B physics at pp collider

Strategy for disentangling channels:- Invariant mass shape (M ~25 MeV)- Kinematical variables- Particle Identification - Oscillation of CP asymmetry

300 events in 65 pb-1 of CDF Hadronic Trigger data with very good S/B

B0 h+h- is a mixture of

Bd; BdKBsKBsKK

Physics with B0 h+h-

Can soon perform interesting measurements:• Relative B. Ratios: Bd /; Bs KK/K• Direct CP asymmetries in Bd Kself tagging)• CP asymmetries in Bd (with b-tagging)

Later on: CKM angle

CDF II simulation

—sumBdKBsKK

Bd

BsK

( inv.mass)

Page 25: Why B physics at pp collider

Use K/ separation dE/dx

1.16

Disentangling the B0h+h-

contributionsUse M vs (1-p1/p2)q1

See M. Morello’s talk

B0d B0

d K- B0d K+

B0s K+ B0

s K-B0s KK

Expected fraction res. (MC 65 pb-1)B0

d K(0.6): 0.062 (stat)

B0 d(0.15): 0.056 (stat)

B0sKK(0.2): 0.045 (stat)

B0 sK(0.05): 0.036 (stat)

ACP(B0d

K): 0.14 (PDG-2002: 0.06)

Page 26: Why B physics at pp collider

Angle from B0h+h-

B0 + has two (comparable) decay amplitudes:

Tree Penguin

b

d

W+u

d

u

+

B0 d

ACP(t) = ACP dir cos(md t) + ACP

mix sin(md t)

ACPdir, ACP

mix functions of , , d, (d ei P / T decay amplitude)

direct CP CP from mixing alone

R. Fleischer (PLB 459 (1999) 306): Assume U-spin symmetry (d s)Similar relation holds for Bs K+K (md replaced by ms)The 4 asymmetries can be expressed as function of , and P/T amplitude ratio

Parameters can be extracted from fit of meas. of ACP(t) for Bd and BsKK

d

b W+

u

+

B0 u,c,t

d

d

u

(SU(3) breaking effects)Expected (2fb-1) accuracy: () = ±10(stat) ±3(syst)

g

ms/md

Page 27: Why B physics at pp collider

Hadronic b c signal

• Measure mass, lifetime, polarization

• Precise Lifetime

Discrepancy with theory:Is it valid for baryons ?

b c [pK]

Largest fully rec. hadronic channel

)τ(B)τ(Λ

0b

NO PID YET

pK Mass [GeV]

pK Mass [GeV]

See Y. Li’s Talk

Page 28: Why B physics at pp collider

Conclusions The upgraded CDF/D0 detectors are taking new data Great B physics potential, we have results on:

- Masses, lifetimes in the BJ/K exclusive channels and production cross sections- New impact parameter trigger (CDF-only): huge/clean semileptonic/all hadronic B signals (and also Charm):

- Large and clean BlDX reconstructed in CDF (excellent for lifetime, tagging and md

meas.)

- B0s → D-

s π+: first ingredient towards ms

- B0h+h-: important results awaiting on our

way to (B0

sKK, CP in B0dK)

Lots of Beauty (and Charm) at the Tevatron

Page 29: Why B physics at pp collider

Backup Slides

Page 30: Why B physics at pp collider

CDF Integrated Luminosity

Mar 02

commissioning

Data used for Today’s results Mar 02 – Jan 03

130 pb-1 (delivered)

100 pb-1 (to tape)

B/Charm: ~ 70 pb-1

Jan 03

Page 31: Why B physics at pp collider

B physics prospects(with 2fb-1)

Bs mixing: Bs →Dsπ(Ds3π) (xs up to 60, with xd meas. one side of U.T.)

Angle : B0→ J/ψ Ks (refine Run1 meas. up to (sen2) 0.05)

CP violation, angle γ : B0→ ππ(πK), Bs → KK(Kπ)

Angle s and s/ s : Bs→ J/ψ (probe for New Physics)

Precise Lifetimes, Masses, BR for all B-hadrons: Bs, Bc, Λb … (CDF observed: Bc → J/ψ e(). Now hadronic channels Bc → Bs X can be explored)

HF cross sections (beauty and charm)

Stringent tests of SM … or evidence for new physics !!

Both competitive and complementary to B -factories

Page 32: Why B physics at pp collider

Sin(2) in B0J/Ks

N(B0)(t) - N(B0)(t)

N(B0)(t) + N(B0)(t)=Dsin(2)sinmd

tACP(t) =

N(J/ Ks) from scaling Run I data:• x 20 luminosity

8,000• x 1.25 tracks at L1 trigger 10,000• x 2 muon acceptance 20,000• Trigger on J/ e+e + 10,000

In Run1 measured:

sin(2)=0.79±0.39±0.16

B0 J/ Ks ; J/

(400 events)(+60 B0 (2S) Ks)

sin(2)=0.91±0.32±0.18

Combined D2: from 6.3% to 9.1% (Kaon b-tag)

Same S/B = 1

Expect: s(sin2b) 0.05

With 2fb-1 can refine this measurementAlthough: no way to compete with B-Factories !

)) (2 sin( S B

ND1

2

1Stat. Error:

Systematic ~ 0.5xStatistical

(scales with control sample statistics)

ms/md

Page 33: Why B physics at pp collider

Tevatron Performance

July ‘01

Now

Tevatron operations • Startup slow, but progress steady !

• Now: L ~3.5 x 1031 cm-2s-1

integrating ~ 6. pb-1/week• … still factor 2-3 below planned valuesadditional improvements (~10-20%) expected from Jan. 3weeks shutdownCDF operations

• Commissioning: Summer 2001• Physics data since February 2002• Running with >90% Silicon integrated

since July 2002

Initial Luminosity3.8 x 1031

110 pb -1

July ‘02

On-tape Luminosity

Luminosity (on-tape): ~20pb-1 until June (analyses in this talk) Additional 90pb-1 July – December Reach 300- 400 pb-1 by October 2003

Feb ‘02

Page 34: Why B physics at pp collider

Quadrant of CDF II Tracker

LAYER 00: 1 layer of radiation-hard silicon at very small radius (1.5 cm) (achievable: 45 fs proper time resolution in Bs Ds )

COT: large radius (1.4 m) Drift C.

• 96 layers, 100ns drift time • Precise PT above 400 MeV/c

• Precise 3D tracking in ||<1

(1/PT) ~ 0.1%GeV –1; (hit)~150m

• dE/dx info provides 1 sigma K/ separation above 2 GeV

SVX-II + ISL: 6 (7) layers of double-side silicon (3cm < R < 30cm)• Standalone 3D tracking up to ||= 2• Very good I.P. resolution: ~30m (~20 m with Layer00)

TOF: 100ps resolution, 2 sigma K/ separation for tracks below 1.6 GeV/c (significant improvement of Bs flavor tag effectiveness)

TIME OF FLIGHT

Page 35: Why B physics at pp collider

CDF II Trigger System3 levels : 5 MHz (pp rate) 50 Hz (disk/tape storage rate) almost no dead time (< 10%)

XFT: “EXtremely Fast Tracker” 2D COT track reconstruction at Level 1

• PT res. pT/p2T = 2% (GeV-1)

• azimuthal angle res. = 8 mrad

SVT: “Silicon Vertex Tracker” precise 2D Silicon+XFT tracking at Level 2

• impact parameter res. d = 35 m

Offline accuracy !!

CAL COT MUON SVX CES

XFT XCES

XTRP

SVTL2

CAL

L1CAL

GLOBALL1

L1MUON

L1TRACK

GLOBALLEVEL 2 TSI/CLK

CDF II can trigger on secondary vertices !! Select large B,D samples !!

Matched to L1 ele. and muonsenhanced J/ samples

Page 36: Why B physics at pp collider

SVT: Triggering on impact parameters

d

beam spot

COT track ( 2 parameters) 5 SVX coordinates

Impact Parameter (transverse projection)

• Combines COT tracks (from XFT) with Silicon Hits (via patternmatching) • Fits track parameters in the transverse plane (d, , PT) with offline res.• All this in ~15s !• Allows triggering on displaced impact parameters/vertices• CDF becomes a beauty/charm factory

~150 VME boards

Page 37: Why B physics at pp collider

B triggers: conventional

Suffer of low BR and not fully rec. final state

Need specialized triggers(bb) / (pp) 10-3

CDF Run1, lepton-based triggers:

Di-leptons (, PT 2 GeV/c): B J/ X, J/ Single high PT lepton ( 8 GeV/c): B l D X

Now enhanced, thanks to XFT (precise tracking at L1) :• Reduced (21.5 GeV/c) and more effective PT thresholds • Increased muon and electron coverage• Also J/ ee

Nevertheless, many important measurements by CDF 1: B0

d mixing, sin(2), B lifetimes, Bc observation, …

Page 38: Why B physics at pp collider

XFT performance

XFT: L1 trigger on tracks better than design resolution

pT/p2T = 1.65% (GeV-1)

= 5.1 mrad

XFT track

Offlinetrack

Efficiency curve: XFT threshold at PT=1.5 GeV/c

= 96.1 ± 0.1 % (L1 trigger)

53.000 J/

11 pb-

1

Page 39: Why B physics at pp collider

SVT performance

D0 K used as online monitor of the hadronic SVT triggers

I.P. resolution as planned

d = 48 m = 35 m 33 m

Efficiency

80%

90%

soon

transverse beam size

intrinsic

S/B 1

Page 40: Why B physics at pp collider

TOF performance TOF resolution (110ps)

within 10% of design value

with TOF PID

S/N = 1/40

S/N = 1/2.5

Background reduction in KK:Low PT (< 1.5 GeV/c) track pairsbefore and after a cut on TOF kaon probabilityx20 bkg reduction, 80% signal efficiency

Page 41: Why B physics at pp collider

CDF J/cross section

0<pt<0.25

GeV 5.0<pt<5.5 GeV10.0<pt<12.0 GeV

(ppJ/; pT>0; ||<0.6) =240 1 (stat) 35/28(syst) nb

Page 42: Why B physics at pp collider

Lots of charm from hadronic triggers:

Foresee a quite interesting charm physics program:• D cross sections, • CP asymmetries and Mixing in D sector, Rare decays, …

56320490

K mass

D0 K

KK mass mass

D0 KK D0

5670180 2020110

(DKK)/(DK) = 11.17 0.48(stat) 0.98 (syst) %(D )/(DK) = 3.37 0.20(stat) 0.16(syst) %

Relative Br. Fractions of Cabibbo suppressed D0 decays :

Already competitivewith CLEO2 results(10fb-1 @ (4S))

!!!!!

With ~10 pbWith ~10 pb-1-1 of “hadronic trigger” data: of “hadronic trigger” data:

O(107) fully reconstructed decays in 2fb-1

Page 43: Why B physics at pp collider

B0s mixing: expectations with

2fb-1

Signal: 20K ( only) - 75K (all) events• with SVT hadronic trigger

• BR (Ds ) = 0.3 % ; BR (Ds ) = 0.8 %

Resolution: (c) = 45 fs (with Layer00)

D2 = 11.3% (with TOF)

S/B: 0.5-2 (based on CDF I data)

5 sensitivity up to:

Xs = 63 (S/B = 2/1)

Xs = 53 (S/B = 1/2)

S.M. allowed range: 20. < Xs < 35.

Can do a precise measurement… or evidence for new physics !

xs = ms(B0s)Bs Ds, Ds

Ds , K*K,

2( m )22

1 1 S B( x )

N D Ss t

s e

Page 44: Why B physics at pp collider

Projections for xs reach with 2fb-1

Xs = 42-63

Optimistic: S/B =2/1 Conservative: S/B =1/2

MC simulation: accounts also for SVT cuts on proper time acceptance,non-Gaussian tails in proper time resolution function

Xs = 32-53