who is afraid of black scholes

86
Who is Afraid of Black Scholes A Gentle Introduction to Quantitative Finance Day 2 July 12 th 13 th and 15 th 2013 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS

Upload: trory

Post on 22-Feb-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Who is Afraid of Black Scholes. A Gentle Introduction to Quantitative Finance Day 2. July 12 th 13 th and 15 th 2013 UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS. Ito Calculus. Suppose the stock price evolved as Problem with this model is that the price can become negative . Ito Calculus. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

A Gentle Introduction to Quantitative FinanceDay 2

July 12th 13th and 15th 2013UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS

Page 2: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Ito Calculus

• Suppose the stock price evolved as

• Problem with this model is that the price can become negative

Page 3: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Ito Calculus

• A better model is that the ‘relative price’ NOT the price itself reacts to market fluctuations

• Q: What does this integral mean?

Page 4: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Constructing the Ito Integral

• We will try and construct the Ito Stochastic Integral in analogy with the Riemann-Stieltjes integral

• Note the function evaluation at the left end point!!!• Q: In what sense does it converge?

Page 5: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Stochastic Differential Equations

• Consider the following Ito Integral

• We use the shorthand notation to write this as

• This is a simple example of a stochastic differential equation

Page 6: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Convergence of the Integral• We have noted the integral converges in the ‘mean square

sense’• To see what this means consider

• This means

Page 7: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Convergence of the Integral

So we have (in the mean square sense) OR

Page 8: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

How to Integrate?• A detour into the world of Ito differential calculus

• Q: What is the differential of a function of a stochastic variable?• e.g. If what is • Is it true that in the stochastic world as well?• We will see the answer is in the negative• We will construct the correct Taylor Rule for functions of

stochastic variables• This will help us integrating such functions as well

Page 9: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Taylor Series & Ito’s Lemma• Consider the Taylor expansion

• The change in F is given by

• We note that behaves like a determinist quantity that is it’s expected value as

• i.e. formally!!

Page 10: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Taylor Series & Ito’s Lemma

• We consider when

• So the change involves a deterministic part and a stochastic part

Page 11: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Ito’s Lemma

• We consider a function of a Weiner Process and consider a change in both W and t

Ito’s Lemma

Page 12: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Ito’s Lemma

• Obtain an SDE for the process• We observe that

• So by Ito’s Lemma

Page 13: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Integration

• Using Ito we can derive

• E.g. Show that

Page 14: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Example • Evaluate

• Evaluate

Page 15: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Extension of Ito’s Lemma

• Consider a function of a process that itself depends on a Weiner process

• What is the jump in V if ?

Page 16: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Extension of Ito

• So we have the result

Page 17: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Example

• If S evolves according to GBM find the SDE for V

• Given

• Given

Page 18: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Stochastic Differential Equation

• We will now ‘solve’ some SDE

• Most SDE do NOT have a closed form solution

• We will consider some popular ones that do

Page 19: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Arithmetic Brownian Motion

• Consider dX=aXdt+bdW• To ‘solve’ this we consider the process

• From extended Ito’s Lemma

Page 20: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Ito Isometry

• A shorthand rule when taking averages

• Lets find the conditional mean and variance of ABM

Page 21: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Mean and Variance of ABM

• We have using Ito Isometry

Page 22: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Geometric Brownian Motion

• The process is given by

• To solve this SDE we consider

• Using extended form of Ito we have

Page 23: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Black Scholes World• The value of an option depends on the price of the

underlying and time

• It also depends on the strike price and the time to expiry

• The option price further depends on the parameters of the asset price such as drift and volatility and the risk free rate of interest

• To summarize

Page 24: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Assumptions

• The underlying follows a log normal process (GBM)• The risk free rate is known (it could be time

dependent)• Volatility and drift are known constants• There are no dividends• Delta hedging is done continuously• No transaction costs• There are no arbitrage opportunities

Page 25: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

A Simple One Step Discrete Case

Page 26: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

The Payoff

Page 27: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Short Selling

Page 28: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Hedging with the Right Amount

Page 29: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

And the value is…….

Page 30: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Drift and Volatility

Page 31: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Delta Hedging

• How did one know the quantity of stock to short sell?

• Let’s re do the example:– Start with one option – And short on the stock

• The portfolio at the next time is worth– if the stock rises – if the stock falls

Page 32: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Delta Hedging

• We want these to give the same value

• In general we should go

Page 33: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

The Stock Price Model

• Is out stock price model correct?

Page 34: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation of Black Scholes Equation

• We assumed that the asset price follows

• Construct a portfolio with a long position in the option and a short position in some quantity of the underlying

• • The value of this portfolio is

Page 35: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation

• Q: How does the value of the portfolio change?

• Two factors: change in underlying and change in option value

• We hold delta fixed during this step

Page 36: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation

• We use Ito’s lemma to find the change in the value of the portfolio

• The change in the option price is

• Hence

Page 37: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation

• Plugging in

• Collecting like terms

Page 38: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation• We see two type of movements, deterministic i.e.

those terms with dt and random i.e. those terms with dW

• Q: Is there a way to do away with the risk?

• A: Yes, choose in the right way

• Reducing risk is hedging, this is an example of delta-hedging

Page 39: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation

• We pick

• Now the change in portfolio value is riskless and is given by

Page 40: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Derivation

• If we have a completely risk free change in we must be able to replicate it by investing the same amount in a risk free asset

• Equating the two we get

Page 41: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Black Scholes Equation

• We know what should be

• This gives us the Black Scholes Equation

Page 42: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Black Scholes Equation

• This is a linear parabolic PDE

• Note that this does not contain the drift of the underlying

• This is because we have exploited the perfect correlation between movements in the underlying and those in the option price.

Page 43: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Black Scholes Equation

• The different kinds of options valued by BS are specified by the Initial (Final) and Boundary Conditions

• For example for a European Call we have

• We will discuss BC’s later

Page 44: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Variations: Dividend Paying Stock• If the underlying pays dividends the BS can be

modified easily• We assume that the dividend is paid

continuously • i.e. we receive in time • Going back to the change in the value of the

portfolio

Page 45: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Variations: Dividend Paying Stock

• The last terms represents the amount of dividend

• Using the same delta hedging and replication argument as before we have

Page 46: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Variations: Currency Options

• These can be handled as in the previous case

• Let be the rate of interest received on the foreign currency, then

Page 47: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Variations: Options on Commodities

• Here the cost of carry must be adjusted

• To simplify matters we calculate the cost of carrying a commodity in terms of the value of the commodity itself

• Let q be the fraction that goes toward the cost of carry, then

Page 48: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes Equation• We need to solve a BS PDE with Final Conditions

• We will convert it to a ‘Diffusion Equation IVP’ by suitable change of variables

• Method of solution depends upon the PDE and BC

• Considering the BC in this case we will use the Fourier Transform Methods to find a function that satisfies the PDE and the BC

• Using different IC/FC will give the value for different options

Page 49: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Transforming the BS Equation

• Consider the Black Scholes Equation given by

• As a first step towards solving this we will transform it into a IVP for a Diffusion Equation on the real line

Page 50: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Transforming the BS Equation

• We make the change of variables

• This transforms the equation into

• Where

Page 51: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Transforming the BS Equation

• Choosing

• Letting

• Choose to simplify the expression

Page 52: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Transforming the BS Equation

• i.e. we take

• We get the following IVP

Page 53: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Introducing the Fourier Transform

• Our introduction will be very formal

• We will study only those properties that are needed to solve the IBVP

• We will derive a solution called the fundamental solution (Green’s function)

• This will allow us to find option pricing using BS

Page 54: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Fourier Transform

• We define the Fourier transform of ‘nice’ functions as

• The inverse transform is defined as

Page 55: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Fourier Transform: Properties• We state some basic properties

– Linearity : If and then for

– Translation: for

– Modulation: If

Page 56: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Fourier Transform: Properties

• A very useful property for solving linear constant coefficients differential equations is

• Pf: Integrate by parts in the definition

Page 57: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Fourier Transforms Table of some common transforms

F(x) F(k)

Page 58: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving an IBVP

• We will use the Fourier Transform Method to solve the heat equation on an infinite domain

• PDE

• IC

• BC as

Page 59: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Heat Equation • Take the Fourier Transform of both sides and assuming

• We have using the properties of FT

Page 60: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

The Heat Kernel

Page 61: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Heat Equation

• For a general initial condition we note that the solution is given by

• The idea is that you ‘break’ your IC into tiny bits and add them (integrate)

Page 62: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Back to the Black Scholes Equation

• We had transformed the B-S FVP to the IVP

• Where

Page 63: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes for a European Call

• Here the final condition is replaced by the IC

• Recalling the IVP and the fundamental solution, we have

Page 64: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes for a European Call

• Going back to the original variables

• The call option has the payoff

Page 65: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes for a European Call

• Substituting into the solution we have

Page 66: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes for a European Call

• From which we get

Page 67: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solving the Black Scholes for a European Call

• These are integrals of the form

• By doing a little algebra (HW 4) we have

Page 68: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

European Call Option

Page 69: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

The Black Scholes PDE• Consider the Black Scholes Equation given by

• European Call• European Put• Binary Options• American Style Options

Page 70: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solution of Black Scholes for a European Call

• Solution for a European Call

Page 71: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Solution for a European Put• We use the put call parity

• Using the solution for a European Call

• Noting

• We have

Page 72: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Calculating the Greeks• To calculate for a call we note

• The delta for a put is given by

Page 73: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Binary Options • The payoff is of a binary call option given by• The price of an European type option is given by

• So we have

Page 74: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options

• These can be exercised anytime prior to and at expiry

• Issue with analyzing these is ascertaining when to exercise

• This will lead to a free boundary problem

Page 75: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options

• Note that if the previous was the value of an American Put then there would be an arbitrage opportunity. i.e. If an arbitrage opportunity exists

• Pf: Buy the assent in the market for S and the option for P, immediately selling the asset for K by exercising the option. We make a risk free profit of

• Hence for the American Option we have

Page 76: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Put

• This can be exercised at any point and there is not expiry

• The payoff is

• We have already note that

• The option must satisfy the BS ODE

Page 77: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Put

• Solving the BS equation we have

• We also know that as

• Suppose we exercise when so that the payoff is

• Q: What is this ‘optimal’ exercise price?

Page 78: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Put

• This gives us the value of B

• Q: What maximizes V?• Setting

Page 79: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Put

• Notice the slope of the payoff function and the option value are the same at

• This is called the smooth pasting condition

Page 80: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Options with Dividends

• Let’s consider the perpetual American Call with dividends

• This has solutions

• The perpetual put now has value

• It is optimal to exercise when

Page 81: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

Perpetual American Call with Dividends

• The solution for a perpetual call is

• Optimal to exercise when

• If there are no dividends then and it is NEVER optimal to exercise

Page 82: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options with Finite Time Horizon

• Consider the case where the strike time is finite

• We construct a portfolio with one option and short Δ of the underlying

• Change in the value of the portfolio in access of the risk free rate is

Page 83: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options with Finite Time Horizon

• We delta hedge to obtain

• We have three possibilities

Page 84: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options with Finite Time Horizon

• We consider them each• – There is an arbitrage opportunity as one can buy the

option and short sell the asset and loaning out the cash• – There is an arbitrage opportunity as one can sell the

option and buy the asset borrowing cash • In the American Option case the second strategy will

not always lead to arbitrage as exercising the option in no longer in the hands of the seller

Page 85: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options with Finite Time Horizon

• So we have

(Payoff for early exercise)

is continuous

Page 86: Who is Afraid of Black Scholes

American Options with Finite Time Horizon

• Q: How to go about ‘solving’ this?

• A: Closed form solutions not available Will sue numerics (finite difference) Recast as a Linear Complementarity

problem