who am i? ● daniel john kirby ● carnegie mellon physics class of 2013 ● in hall a june-july...

20
Who am I? Daniel John Kirby Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 In Hall A June-July 2012

Upload: emily-harrington

Post on 11-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Who am I?

●Daniel John Kirby●Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013●In Hall A June-July 2012

Page 2: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Task: Implement systems to make FASTBUS readout faster (using

CODA)

Page 3: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

The Goal: Reducing Deadtime

Main Sources of Deadtime Conversion

Readout

Page 4: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Mathematical Model

Page 5: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Tasks to Implement

Multiblock Readout

SFI sequencing

Event Blocking and Parallel Buffering

Module Buffering

Sparsification

Library Implementation

Page 6: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Sparsification

Page 7: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Event Blocking Illustrated

Thanks to Dave Abbott for this idea.

Page 8: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Increasing the Buffer Depth

Page 9: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Parallel Buffering

Split TDC buffer into two distinct buffers.Readout and trigger acceptance can happen

concurrently

Page 10: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Sequential vs. Parallel Buffering

Page 11: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Looking Forward: Parallel Module Buffering

Reduces effective trigger rate.Thanks to Igor Rachek for original concept.Thanks to Bryan Moffit for help improving this diagram.

Page 12: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Effect of Module Buffering

Page 13: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Acknowledgements

Once again I'd like to extend special thanks to:

Bogdan Wojtsekhowski Bryan Moffit Dave Abbott Igor Rachek

Page 14: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Magnetic Field in Gas Cherenkov Counter By: Austin Milby, Menchville High School, class 2013

Physics is COOL!

Page 15: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Magnetic Field in Gas Cherenkov Counter Introduction

WHAT: Shielding of PMT’s from magnetic field generated by BigBite

WHY: Magnetic field can cause electrons in PMT to change direction and bend away from dynodes, resulting in skewed data

HOW: By implementing a magnetic shielding box for use in the Cherenkov Counter, we can reduce the presence of the magnetic field around the PMT’s which will result in more accurate data

Study done by SLAC found that Y-orientation of PMT is most severely affected by magnetic field.

Need field to be bellow 1 Gauss!

Page 16: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Detector of the BigBite spectrometer in A1n experiment

I am working with magnetic shielding of the PMT for the Gas Cherenkov counter

Page 17: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

BigBite magnet and the field components

Field components are of 5-10 GaussAt PMT the field need to be reducedto the level of 0.5-1 Gauss

Bz component, Gauss

By component, Gauss

Bx component, Gauss

-100cm 100cm

-100cm 100cm

-100cm 100cm

7

2

-2

10

5

1

-1

-2.5

-4

(through center of Cherenkov Counter)

Page 18: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

The layout of the PMTs in the counters

Design of Magnetic Shielding Box being considered for use in detector. It will be placed in green area on picture.

Mirror

PMT face

Center of counter where data on previous slide was obtained

Page 19: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

BigBite Magnet and the Field Components (2)

(Data taken along purple line)

Bx component, Gauss

By component, Gauss

Bz component, Gauss

(Along surface of PMTs)

100cm -100cm

100cm -100cm

100cm -100cm

Page 20: Who am I? ● Daniel John Kirby ● Carnegie Mellon Physics Class of 2013 ● In Hall A June-July 2012

Magnetic Shielding

Black box outlines location of PMTs in shielding box.

PMT faces

NOTE: Data taken with external field of 20 Gauss and current in compensation coil set at 120 amps