wherefore the consultant
DESCRIPTION
What value a professional consultant addsTRANSCRIPT
As printed in the MANAGEMENT REPORT Consultants Directory 1994
“A consultant is a
knowledge broker. We
advise and assist our
clients, but they remain
responsible for their
decisions
Wherefore The Consultant?
- An Interview with Angelo Kehayas, council member of the Institute of Management Consultants -
Nobody knows everything. All too often our
own interests, our limited skills and the
immediacy of our problems cloud our ability to
make sound judgements, or even to see a
solution. That’s where a consultant can step in
and provide an answer. Independent and
objective consultants offer expert knowledge,
experience and raw talent, at a price. In this
emerging era of partnerships and competition,
it’s likely you’re going to need a consultant
sooner or later. Massive macro forces of
change are sweeping through every market and
every industry. New social pressures, new
economic dependencies, a new political
landscape and the powerful effects of a rapidly
globalising and technology
driven world economy are
forcing every business to re-
think its roots.
A consulting relationship is
something very special. It only
works if you’re brutally honest,
and painfully open. Yet, how
can you do either without an
absolute assurance of trust?
You can’t. Working with a
consultant is an intimate and
demanding affair, for both you
and your consultant. The good
news is there are rules to the
game, and they apply to both
sides. The bottom line – you’re
accountable for whatever you
decide; your consultants are
accountable to you for the
quality of the advice they give
you.
Defining Jelly Fish
What exactly is consulting? Angelo Kehayas,
a council member of South Africa’s 380
member Institute of Management Consultants
says: “It’s a professional service provided by
objective, independent, qualified persons in
identifying problems concerned with policy.
Organisation, procedure and methods,
recommending appropriate action, and helping
to implement their recommendations.”
But Kehayas warns there is often a blurring of
definition between a contractor and a
consultant. “A consultant must be able to
transfer skills.” The difference, he says, lies in
the kind of service the party provides, and how
they charge for it. “Consultants take an
external, independent view. A contractor
replaces existent or perhaps non-existent line
functionality.” But Kehayas emphasises that
he’s not saying that consultants cannot
contract, or perform functional work for a
client. When they do, “independence must be
checked. The client must determine that there
is no conflict of interests.”
Consulting roles are
changing, as is every
business. “The market is
integrating vertically, forward
and backward. Vendors are
getting into consulting, and
consultants are getting into
vending” says Kehayas. “It
all comes down to the
dependence on revenue.”
Free form knowledge and
unconstrained creative input
may not always be what you
get from a consultant, nor
perhaps what you want.
Many consultants have a pet
product – a methodology or
model – they prefer to apply
to solving a problem. The
great benefit is the structured
manner of approach it
provides. The risk is that the
model may not be absolutely
applicable to the task at hand.
“A model or methodology should be flexible
enough to accommodate a client’s specific
requirements,” says Kehayas. “And the
consultant and client concerned should be
honest enough to acknowledge needs of
modification. Beware of using a pet tool as a
fix-all. Creativity suffers.”
As printed in the MANAGEMENT REPORT Consultants Directory 1994
A Question of Accountability
Perhaps the most interesting question in the
client-consultant relationship is the one of
accountability. Two levels to the problem
exist – the consultant’s accountability to their
client, and the client’s accountability for the
decisions taken as a result of the consultant’s
input. “A consultant is a knowledge broker.
We advise and assist our clients, but they
remain responsible for their decisions,” says
Kehayas.
At the heart of the issue is a core requirement
for ethical conduct. Around the world
institutes and organisations representing the consulting profession have formulated codes of
ethics. In South Africa the creation of a
similar code tops the Institute’s agenda.
“Confidentiality and a consciousness of
potential conflicts of interests are critical,”
says Kehayas. With little or no statutory
enforcement possible, the industry must be
mostly self-policing. The reference nature
with which much of its business functions is in
itself a form of ethical control.
There are defined and dependable ways of
working with a consultant. At the heart of it
lies a terms of reference – a document that
defines the roles and responsibilities, the
expected outcome, the points of measurement,
and the definition of the problem to be solved.
Agreeing upon the content of this document is
a critical first step to a successful relationship.
But Kehayas warns that managing the terms of
reference is in itself a task of managing
change. “Definitions will need constant re-
evaluation as the environment changes,” he
says.
With the environment and terms of reference
changing dynamically, on-going re-evaluation
is crucial. Says Kehayas: “Regular
communication should happen, going both
directions.” In a large assignment, audit and
quality assurance committees might be set-up
by both parties to ensure the work is being
done correctly. And when all’s finished,
perhaps one of the most important steps in the
whole monitoring process – the post
implementation evaluation. “It only happens
18 months or more after the job is finished.
But it’s crucial to both the consultant and the
client that it’s done,” says Kehayas.
From a charging perspective few guidelines
exist. “I don’t know of any organisation of
consultants anywhere in the world with a fixed
fee structure. Market forces will determine
what works to a large extent,” says Kehayas.
The Client Carries The Can
Kehayas keeps coming back to the fact that the
consultant’s sole role is to act as a knowledge
input for the client. The clients remain
responsible for their decisions. It’s a tough
definition to swallow, but a logical one.
Measuring value for money falls back to the
need for on-going re-evaluation of the terms of
reference and the status of the job against its
defined goals. If an audit group is set-up, it is
crucial that it be truly independent.
“Phase zero is when the consultant scopes the
assignment. It’s probably advisable to allow a
reasonable time and materials budget for this,”
says Kehayas. “It’s after this that the client
and the consultant should come up with the
terms of reference together.” Kehayas advises
clients strongly to formulate for themselves a
definition of the consultant’s role, and an
outline of the expected achievements.
“It’s important to keep distinguishing between
a consultant and a contractor,” says Kehayas.
It’s for these reasons he believes the on-going
review meetings are so important. “The
consultant’s role is to provide advice, and
perhaps to perform very brief tasks. That’s
quite opposite to acting as a line manager,” he
warns. If contractor type work is required, the
terms of reference and the accountability will
need fundamental re-evaluation. “In a
consulting relationship, the onus never falls off
the line manager,” Kehayas emphasises once
again.
“At the post implementation review, the client
should be going back to the terms of reference
and determining whether the job cost is what
was expected, whether the objectives and
expected outcome were achieved, and what the
impact on the business was.”
One core issue is the decision of the type of
consultant to use. The choice is really between
large established firms, and smaller – perhaps
even one man – operations. It’s all really a
balance of risk and reward. “The client needs
to balance the perceived risks of using
individuals against the cost of using a major
firm, and benefiting from the security they
deliver,” says Kehayas. Quick resource
replacement is an issue.
As printed in the MANAGEMENT REPORT Consultants Directory 1994
Instituting Credibility
South Africa’s Institute of Management
Consultants (IMC) was established to help
formalise the consulting issues. “We have
fairly stringent set of rules,” says council
member Kehayas. “These help ensure that our
members qualify in terms of our definitions.”
While the council does not actively monitor or
measure the Institute’s members’ performance,
Kehayas says it can act as a “watch dog” body,
providing quality control and arbitration
services.
For the client, the Institute provides a check
list and reference point. “We would be quite
happy to nominate a member to perform a
quality checking role,” says Kehayas.
With international reciprocity, the IMC offer
consultants a link to compatriots around the
world. It also offers a benchmark on
international standards. Accredited training
can be done through the IMC, allowing
consultants the benefit from the association
and acceptance of their peers.
Openness to change is a fundamental principal
of business survival. Consultants provide a
crucial source of external expertise. But
working with consultants is a delicate and
demanding process. Responsibilities, roles,
measures and definitions are vital. South
Africa’s IMC provides a crucial back-bone to a
relatively unstructured industry.
STEPS TO A CONSULTING
RELATIONSHIP
• Assignment Initiation • First Client Contact • Identify and Define Client Need • Explore Readiness for Change • Explore Potential for Working Together • Identify Benefit • Understanding The Problem and Scope
(Terms of Reference)
• Expected Products and Outcomes • Roles and Responsibilities • Schedules and Accountability • Estimates and Fee Arrangements • Change Management • Project Management • Objective Setting • Work Planning • Documentation • Interim Reporting • Quality Assurance • Closure of Assignment • Post Implementation Evaluation
• Arbitration and Expert Monitoring