where do women who deliver at home fall through the cracks in the pmtct continuum of care?
DESCRIPTION
Where do women who deliver at home fall through the cracks in the PMTCT Continuum of Care? Descriptive evidence from Zimbabwe. Karen A Webb 1 , D Patel 1 , G Mujaranji 1 , B Engelsmann 1 1 Organisation for Public Health Interventions and Development (OPHID) Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Where do women who deliver at home fall through the cracks in the PMTCT Continuum of
Care?
Descriptive evidence from Zimbabwe
Karen A Webb1, D Patel1, G Mujaranji1, B Engelsmann1
1Organisation for Public Health Interventions and Development (OPHID) Trust, Harare, Zimbabwe
International AIDS Conference 2012Session: Challenges in Scaling Up PMTCT
Internationally• 60 million non-facility births each year
worldwide • Results in preventable maternal and
infant morbidity and mortality• Limits PMTCT programme coverage• Non-adherence to ARVs to prevent
vertical transmissionZimbabwe• Adult HIV prevalence 15%; Women 15-49
18%• Increasing trend of home deliveries
Percentage national home delivery in Zimbabwe 1999-2010
Background: Home delivery limits maternal and newborn health and PMTCT programmes
1999 (ZDHS)
2005 -2006
(ZDHS)
2009 (MIMS)
2010 -2011
(ZDHS)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
23%
31%
39%35%
1 in 3 women in Zimbabwe deliver at home
Objective: Describe the process of home delivery and services received by mothers ante, peri and postpartum
to identify gaps in the PMTCT Continuum of Care and generate recommendations for intervention.
MethodsMethods: Descriptive, retrospective study of mothers who delivered at home in the previous 12 months in Mashonaland
Central Province
• Mixed-method sampling:• Systematic selection: facility registers of
home births• Purposive sampling: community level
chain-referral
• Household-level interviews using pilot-tested, structured questionnaire
• Data entered using Epi Info V3.5.1 and descriptive analysis conducted using SPSS for Windows V16.0
• 355 women who delivered at home from catchment of 12 health facilities
Results: Women who delivered at home shared characteristics with the most vulnerable and
isolated• Rural - 81%
• Young - mean age 26
• Limited education - Primary highest for 60%
• Apostolic (60.5%) or Traditional Religious Beliefs (18.9%)
• Resource constrained - 10.4% women, 28.4% partners formally employed
• Trend between increased parity and home delivery - even though 89% said home delivery unplanned
• Limited social support - 96% children in the household, few stay with partners
Results: ANC attendance rates improving but uptake is too late and # of visits not optimal
Antenatal Services Intrapartum Services
Postpartum /Postnatal Services
1 2 3
• 80.2% booked for ANC
• 78% HIV tested in pregnancy, 89.8% of whom booked for ANC
However…
• ANC uptake late - 20+ weeks for 57.2% of women
• Only 24.2% attended 4+ ANC appointments
Results: There is more than meets the eye regarding the reasons why women deliver at
home.
41.1%
43.7%
7.9%7.3%Knowledge
All Other
Fees
Proximity
Percentage grouped number one reasons for home delivery
• Fees still greatest barrier in areas with free maternity services
• Unskilled Birth Attendant costs approximate or exceed clinic fees
• High ANC uptake –with adequate planning, transport for service uptake possible
Antenatal Services Intrapartum Services
Postpartum /Postnatal Services
1 2 3
Results: High rates of postnatal care for babies, but uptake is not prompt.
Antenatal Services Intrapartum Services
Postpartum /Postnatal Services
• 88.2% babies taken for post-natal check-ups – only 37.5% within 72 hours after birth
321
within 24 hours
1-3 days 4-10 days 2-6 weeks 6 weeks + no post natal care
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
11%
26% 25%
18%
9%11%
• 18/20 HIV+ mothers brought in babies within 72 hours
Time after birth post natal care for child accessed
63%
Results: The picture of postnatal care and services for mothers following home delivery is
poor.Antenatal Services Intrapartum
ServicesPostpartum /
Postnatal Services
321
• Significantly fewer mothers accessed postnatal care for themselves (64%) than for their babies (p< 0.0001 Pearson’s Chi-square)
• Only 30% reported receiving post-natal counselling
Results: ‘Zero uptake’ group emerged that failed to access services at critical stages along the
continuum
Series1
4.2%
8.4%
13.2%
19.8%
100%
Increasin
gly invisib
le
Lost
Non Facility Birth
Zero UptakeHow do we find and support these increasingly invisible women?
No ANC
No ANC, HIV test
No ANC, HIV test, PNC Mother
Com
poun
ded
Zero
Upt
ake
Cascade of Zero Uptake of PMTCT Continuum of Care Services
Big jump from non facility birth to next level
Summary: There is good news and bad news about uptake along the PMTCT continuum of
care for mothers who deliver at home.
Antenatal Services Intrapartum Services
Postpartum /Postnatal Services
321
0 facility based delivery
ANC uptake and postnatal care for babies >80%
Zero Uptake group dropping off at each stage of continuum…
<20% before 14 weeks
24% 4+ ANC <38% babies received PPC
Low PNC and counselling for mothers
Discussion: What are we going to do about the chasm of skilled attendance at birth?
Antenatal Services20%
Postpartum /Postnatal Services
40%
Intrapartum Services
40%
Preventable infections and complications for mothers and babies – including vertical transmission
Late Uptake
Reduced PMTCT programme coverage
Non adherence to ARVs
Postnatal care not Prompt
Low postnatal counselling =
knowledge and feeding practices
Non adherence to ARVs
Conclusion
• Identify and fill the cracks in the continuum: Early uptake, retention
• Reduce home delivery rates: priority area for unlocking coverage/adherence required for achieving virtual elimination of new paediatric infections
• Know Your Zero Uptakes for targeted and evidence-based outreach and intervention
• Health systems interventions: fees, distance
• Community-based interventions: demand generation, MNCH gatekeepers, supportive community environment for uptake and retention across the continuum
THANK YOU – TATENDA – SIYABONGA
Strengths and Limitations
• No conflicts of interest
• Mixed method sampling provided access to ‘unregistered’ home births and identification of zero uptakes
• Recall bias
• Friendship/proximity biases
• Possible social desirability bias to explain discrepancies in data
• Generalizability
Skilled Attendance or Skilled Attendants at Delivery?
Best Case: “Skilled Attendance” Delivery with skilled attendant at facility
• Quality maternity services – ensure facility birth = skilled attendance
• EmONC• Preventable infections and
complications beyond HIV• Supervised/supported PMTCT
program adherence*Multi-level action and infrastructural health system and community-based support.
Skilled Attendant: Striking balance between optimal public health and reality
• Working with TBAs• Strengthening community-facility
linkages• Birth-packs for HIV positive
women, including prophylaxis for home use
• Innovations: packaging (ARV pouch) and engagement strategies.
*Targeted interventions building on existing capacities
Skilled birth attendant coverage least equitable MNCH intervention in 54 country retrospective review (Barros et al, 2012)
Home Delivery Study Sampling Methodology: Example of Process
Women who delivered at homePMTCT programme progression
• 78% tested for HIV (n=277)• 7% of those tested self-reported being HIV
positive (n=20)• Of positives, 15/17 (83%) enrolled in PMTCT
programme• 100% reported receiving ARVs to prevent
vertical transmission• Regimens reportedly received regimens
behind current recommendations for both mothers and children