when%nuclear%plants% close: aregional%forum … · 2017. 8. 2. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
-
When Nuclear Plants Close:A Regional Forum
on Nuclear Waste Storage and Decommissioning
Highly Radioactive Irradiated Nuclear Fuel: Need for Hardened On-‐Site Storage; Risks of Off-‐Site Transport
Kevin Kamps, Radioactive Waste Specialist, Beyond NuclearGarrison, NYJune 9, 2017
-
Irradiated Nuclear Fuel Transfer,from Pools to Casks
Indoor “Wet” Storage Pool à Outdoor Dry Casks
-
Pools are outside robust containment
-
Close call with catastrophe
Fukushima Daiichi Unit 4Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan
-
Risks of Pool Storage, Transfers
• IP’s long term (~early 1990s-‐present) pool leakage of radioactivity into soil, groundwater, Hudson River (tritium, Sr-‐90, radioactive cesium, cobalt, nickel)
• Heavy load drop risk of pool drain down, zirconium fire (Point Beach, MN & Palisades, MI transfer cask crane dangles; Vermont Yankee crane slip)
-
Crane Risks
-
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) Configurations
Vertical Horizontal
-
ISFSIs
Vertical Horizontal
-
Need for Robust, or Hardened On-‐Site Storage (HOSS)
Dr. Arjun Makhijani, IEER Dr. Gordon Thompson, IRSS
-
Statement of Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors (HOSS)—2006; 2010
• Require a low-‐density, open-‐frame layout for fuel pools (to provide convection air current cooling);
• Establish hardened on-‐site storage (retrievability; real-‐time monitoring for radiation, temperature, pressure; as close as possible, as safely as possible, to point of generation);
• Protect fuel pools;• Require periodic review of HOSS facilities and fuel pools;
• Dedicate funding to local and state governments to independently monitor the sites;
• Prohibit reprocessing.
-
Statement of Principles for Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at Reactors (HOSS)—2006; 2010
• http://ieer.org/wp/wp-‐content/uploads/2010/03/HOSS_PRINCIPLES_3-‐23-‐10x.pdf
• Many hundreds of public interest and environmental organizations, representing all 50 states, including from NY State:
Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes; Center for Health, Environment, and Justice; For a Clean Tonawanda Site (FACTS); Citizen’s Environmental Coalition; Riverkeeper; Central New York Citizens Awareness Network; IPSEC (Indian Point Safe Energy Coalition); Public Health and Sustainable Energy (PHASE); Council on Intelligent Energy & Conservation Policy (CIECP).
-
Dispersed/Concealed HOSS v. Plain View/Clustered Configuration
“Bowling Pins”Graphic from “Robust Storage” by Dr. Gordon Thompson, Jan. 2003
-
Cask/Canister Integrity (Or Lack Thereof)
Holtecs at D.C. Cook, MI Quality Assurance violations
-
Summary of Whistle-‐blower Allegations of Holtec QA Violations
• Faulty welds• Unqualified fabrication materials• Defective neutron shielding material• Failure to perform coupon testing, Post-‐Weld Heat Treatment• Bypassing of hundreds of non-‐conforming conditions, without re-‐
analysis of structural integrity• Improper, uncertified design decisions and changes on the fly• No root cause investigation of epidemic of QA vioaltions• Interference with QA audit, falsification of QA documentation• NRC incompetence, or worse—collusion, complicity
-
Holtec Whistle-‐BlowersOscar Shirani, Commonwealth Edison/Exelon QA inspector
• Holtec casks are “nothing but garbage cans” if they are not made in accordance with government specifications;
• Questions Holtec casks’ structural integrity sitting still, at 0 mph, let alone going 60 mph (accident forces)
Dr. Ross Landsman, NRC Region 3 dry cask storage inspector
• Compared NRC/Holtecdecision making to NASA’s that led to “Space Shuttles hitting the ground”
-
Need for Emergency Cask-‐to-‐Cask Transfer Capability
• Empty irradiated nuclear fuel from vulnerable and leaking storage pools into HOSS, but…
• Maintain operability of empty pool, in order to have cask-‐to-‐cask transfer capability
• Science fiction of NRC’s on-‐site or away-‐from-‐reactor “Dry Transfer Systems”
-
Risks of Off-‐Site Transport
• Severe accidents• Attacks• Mobile X-‐Ray Machines That
Can’t Be Turned Off
-
Mock Nuke Waste Cask Tours
-
High Burn-‐Up makes everything worse (thermal heat, radioactivity)
-
Consolidated Interim Storage FacilitiesWaste Control Specialists, LLC,Andrews County, Texas (WCS)
Eddy-‐Lea [Counties] Energy Alliance, New Mexico (ELEA)
-
Yucca Mountain, Nevada; Geologic Repository (Permanent Burial)
-
Routes: Yucca Mountain, NV-‐bound
-
Yucca-‐bound routes
-
WCS, TX-‐bound routes
WASTE CONTROL SPECIALISTS LLC CHAPTER 2 ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT
Page 2-74 Revision 0
-
WCS, TX-‐bound routes
-
Highly Radioactive LIQUID Waste Truck Shipments?!
-
Highly Radioactive Liquid Waste Truck Shipments
-
Barge ShipmentsBarge Shipments of High-Level Radioactive Waste on the Waters of NJ, NY, and CT
Surrounding New York City Proposed by U.S. Dept. of Energy under its Yucca Mountain Plan
Map taken from Figure J-9, Routes analyzed for barge transportation from sites to nearby railheads, page J-78 and J-81.
Nuclear Reactor Location # of Shipments Proposed Barges offloaded at: Oyster Creek Forked River, NJ Up to 111, along NJ shore Port of Newark, NJ Indian Point Buchanan, NY Up to 58, down Hudson River Port of Jersey City, NJ CT Yankee Haddam Neck, CT Up to 42, on Long Is. Sound Port of New Haven, CT
Total Up to 211 Table taken from Table J-27, Barge shipments and ports, page J-83. Map and table taken from U.S. Department of Energy, “Final Environmental Impact Statement for Yucca Mountain,” Appendix J (“Transportation”), Feb. 2002.
-
Roads and Rails Routes
-
Road and Rail Routes
• http://www.state.nv.us/nucwaste/news2017/pdf/States_Affected.pdf
-
Or Heavy-‐Haul Truck?
-
Risk: Underwater Submersion
-
Risk: High-‐Temperature, Long-‐Duration Fire
-
Risk: Attack
-
Risk: Attack
-
Risk: Attack
-
Where the Radioactive Poisons Go
-
Mobile X-‐Ray MachinesThat Can’t Be Turned Off
-
Block bad decisions, promote good ones