whats the best quality program for your lab? grant maxie, dvm, phd, dacvp director, animal health...
TRANSCRIPT
1
What’s the best quality program for your lab?
Grant Maxie, DVM, PhD, DACVPDirector, Animal Health Laboratory; Co-Executive Director
Nadine Ryan, BScQuality Manager, Laboratory Services Division, University of Guelph
CAHLN-RCTLSA annual meeting, Calgary, AB June 8, 2010
222
• Why have a quality program?
• Alternatives
• Comparisons
• Components of a quality system
• Test validation
• Discussion/Questions
What’s the best quality program for your lab?
33
Why have a quality program?
meet the expectations of clients especially if a requirement of contracts
ensure credibility of results – locally, nationally, and internationally
deal with complaints and solve problemsroot cause analysis
minimize re-work employee recruitment and retention business sustainability and continuity continuous improvement!!
44
Stakeholders/partners of the AHL:
Livestock producers
& animal owners
Practitioners
AHL
CFIA
WOAH (OIE) Public
healthUniversity
Provincial agriculture ministry
Industry
4
55
AHL function and structure
Client service
Laboratory testing
Quality program
5
66
What client services do AHL’s provide?
timely, accurate diagnostic testing credible consultative services support for teaching and research activities strongly client-focused data for risk management - wellness, on-farm food safety, quality assurance animal health surveillance data - public health link (CAHSN – CNPHI)
77
Quality system support of client service
Vision Mission statement Values Quality goals and objectives Quality manual – proceduresRequires:
Periodic strategic planning Management and staff involvement and
commitment
88
Overarching quality principles
say what you do do what you say prove it improve upon it
99
Accreditation routes
1. ISO 9001:2008 Quality Management Systems registration, customer-focused
2. ISO/IEC 17025 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories test-specific scope accreditation
3. AAVLD Requirements for an Accredited Veterinary Medical Diagnostic Laboratory, v 4.3 incorporates ISO/IEC 17025/OIE standards
4. OECD Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)
1010
1. ISO 9001:2008 registration
focuses on customer satisfaction and managing the organization’s interconnected processes to meet the customer’s and regulatory requirements
includes management responsibility, resource management, product (service) realization, and measurement, analysis and improvement
the requirements of ISO 9001 are generic and apply to all organizations
involves annual surveillance audits and a registration audit every 3 years
general in scope, and does not involve assessment of competence to perform individual tests
Cost = ~$5,000 + expenses / year
11
Why ISO 9001 for a lab?
11
Continuous improvement cycle – plan, do, check, actFor a laboratory – substitute “service” for “product”
1212
2. ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation
expands upon the ISO 9001 generic requirements, rewriting to specific laboratory requirements and adding technical requirements relevant to the laboratory’s competence to produce accurate and reliable results
federal labs (CFIA, USDA) typically operate under an ISO/IEC 17025 standard, and work subcontracted from them must meet this standard
biennial external audits are required, questionnaire in intervening years
accreditation is scope-specific (limited to audited tests) and posted on the website of the national accrediting body, e.g., Standards Council of Canada (SCC)
Cost = ~ $6,000 - $29,000 + expenses / year depending on # of tests
13
Why ISO/IEC 17025 for vet dx lab? Internationally recognized Global acceptance of laboratory
data Canada’s accreditation bodies
(SCC & CALA) are members of the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC) and evaluated by other members
The ILAC network consists of 135 bodies representing 88 different economies
13
1414
3. AAVLD accreditation
publically supported veterinary diagnostic labs only has evolved from a peer-help process now based on the OIE Quality Standard and Guidelines
for Veterinary Laboratories: Infectious Diseases, 2008, which is consistent with the ISO/IEC 17025 standard
external audits vary, with a maximum of 5 years between audits
42 accredited labs in North America – BC and ON in Canada
annual fee of $500, audit year = $1,000 + $500/branch lab + local expenses
1515
http://data.memberclicks.com/site/aavld/Comparison_of_AAVLD_-_ISO_17025_Accreditation_Programs_AC_102_4_3_v_1___2_.pdf
AAVLD website
- Member side
- - Accreditation files
16
4. Other accreditation options?
OECD GLP additional quality documentation required contract research lab (CRO) specialty
ISO/IEC 17025 flexible scope (tentative) include multiple test/test types within a broader
scope, e.g., “veterinary microbiology” USA - A2LA (American Association for
Laboratory Accreditation) http://www.a2la.org/ Veterinary Laboratory Accreditation Program
1717
Components of a quality program
ISO section 4 – Management requirements4.1 organization and management – authorities4.2 quality system – quality policy and objectives
documented in a quality manual
4.3 document control4.4 review of requests, tenders, contracts4.5 subcontracting of test services4.6 purchasing of services and supplies4.7 complaints4.8 control of nonconforming testing and test results4.9 corrective and preventive actions4.10 records management4.11 internal audits4.12 periodic management reviews
1818
Components of a quality program
ISO section 5 – Technical requirements5.1 general5.2 personnel (competence, training)5.3 accommodation and environmental conditions5.4 test methods and method validation
SOPs, documented proficiency
5.5 equipment – maintenance, calibration5.6 measurement traceability – reference materials5.7 specimens - sampling5.8 handling of specimens5.9 ensuring the quality of test results - QC5.10 reporting of test results
19
Challenges in maintaining any Q program
staying current – annual/biennial review/ updating of all materials
internal auditing – how frequent, followup on CAPAs
trend analysis – QC on tests, trends in nonconformances
staff commitment – cost-benefit analysis measurable objectives
2020
Why validate tests?
implications for patients (individuals or groups), need to support evidence-based medicine
within lab confidence in test accuracy & precision understand biases (false positives, negatives) competent client service
DVMs are more sophisticated contract/industry requirement
maintain lab revenue!
2121
What is a valid test?
an assay that reliably produces correct resultse.g., correctly identifies animals as positive or
negative for an analyte, antibody, nucleic acid, antigen, etc.
2222
Challenges to validation
information is sometimes available publications package inserts
pressure to release new tests resources, i.e., $$ & time logistical issues
availability of samples from target & control populations numbers collection
2323
AHL test validation process
feasibility diagnostician determines the need for a new
test new technologies (molecular biology) industry needs economic
‘old’ tests are not included discuss amongst selected users in lab
2424
Diagnostic validation considerations
how will the test be used target population & reference population sample size
a priori estimate of Se, Sp statistical confidence
sampling random, convenience, etc. inclusion/exclusion
bias reduction (blind evaluation) gold standard
2525
SOP analytical validation
2626
SOP diagnostic (field) validation
2727
References & resources on how to validate tests OIE Manual of Standards
traditionalhttp://www.oie.int/norms/mmanual/A_00012.html
PCR http://www.oie.int/norms/mmanual/A_00014.html
Veterinary Epidemiology Textbooks Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2000,
Volume 45, Special Issue: Validation and application of diagnostic tests used in veterinary
epidemiologic studies AAVLD Workshop on Test Validation AAVLD Epidemiology Committee
2828
Summary
The bottom line of an effective and auditable laboratory quality program is client satisfaction through rigorous monitoring of valid tests and continuous improvement of processes.
292929