what’s in a name?. rewilding use molecular biological techniques introduce into plants genes that...
TRANSCRIPT
What’s in a Name?
Rewilding
Use molecular biological techniques
Introduce into plants genes that had been bred out
Speed up the “natural” process of crossing modern plants with ancient ones until they have the gene they want in a crop plant that needs it
Examples: Flood-resistant rice, Rust (fungus)-resistant wheat
Advantages
Restoring long-lost genes (Important!!!: preserve diversity; heirloom varieties, seed banks, etc.)
Only reincorporating genes of interest
Much faster process
Sometimes the only alternative: in polyploid plants (with several genetic complements)
Definition Conundrum
In US and Canada: non-G.M.O. foods are prohibited from having genes that could not have occurred in nature in that plant.
Ergo, adding a gene from an ancient variety of the same plant using precision breeding would be allowed.
In Europe: G.M.O. is defined by the process, not the product.
Ergo, methods of genetic engineering are forbidden, even if the gene that is added is from the same plant.
Biopharming
Definition
Synthesizing plant-made pharmaceuticals (PMPs) out of transgenic field crops
Large-molecule drugs based on proteins (ex. Ebola vaccine, therapies to treat and detect cancer and cardiovascular and infectious diseases)
Ebola Therapeutic Drug ZMapp
Mixture of 3 antibodies
Tobacco plants are infected with genetically engineered viruses (harmless to humans) carrying the genes for the 3 antibodies
Upon infection, the virus produce great amounts of the antibodies
Plants are harvested and the antibodies extracted
Injected into patients
Tried on 18 sick rhesus monkeys: all recovered [Nature (2014)]
Controversial Issues
Contamination of food crops
ZMapp was first tried in tomato; later moved to tobacco
But potentially less costly: once the genetically modified plant is made, all you need is a field to grow it, sun and water
Extraction from biological materials is far less costly than in vitro synthesis
Public Perception
Most Americans are unaware of biopharming
Consumers are generally favorable toward using biotechnology to produce medicines
Less enthusiastic about using transgenic animals to produce medicines than GM plants
Public Concerns
Corporate ownership of genetic
Unforeseen impacts on human health
Environmental consequences
Moral/ethical concerns
Concerns may be offset by perceptions of need or benefit, especially in the context of medical applications
Willingness to Purchase
Purchase groupSupport for technology
TotalYes No
Willing 64.3 2.2 66.5
Reluctant 5.7 1.0 6.7
Unwilling 11.6 15.3 26.9
Total 81.6 18.5
Note. Summary percentages are based on n = 510 observations