what type of urban social development we want? by noman … university_nah… · noman ahmed urban...

10
What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

What Type of Urban Social Development We Want?

by

Noman Ahmed

URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENTAN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION

Page 2: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

1. Inclusive – a process where initiatives andbenefits of development include all –including the urban poor communities

2. Participatory – where people engage withdecision making from the beginning – theyare not invited to ribbon cutting alone!

3. Non-physical dimensions – focusing on softinputs to community development – in health,education, social welfare, and disastermitigation – less brick and mortar, more inputon changing quality of human life

Page 3: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

Negotiation for choices –A community in Thailand

Grameen Bank housing intervention – a people centered initiative

Page 4: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

OPP technical assistance to people

Peoples development work supported by OPP

Page 5: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

4. Provision for marginalized – creating anenvironment of acceptance and tolerancefor the marginalized to sustain and retainexistence in respective contexts –preventing persecution, discrimination andmarginalization

5. Re-defining poverty - Relating povertywith resourcelessness; denial of social,economic and cultural freedom; targetingfor victimization; inducing displacement;……….beyond the 1$ or 2$ a day labels!

Page 6: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

Grameen mobilizing women

A view of community architects at work - Nepal

Page 7: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

Internally displaced people -Pakistan

Page 8: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

Internally displaced people -Pakistan

Grameen housing intervention -Bangladesh

Page 9: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

6. Fresh appraisal of informality –

• Legality vs Legitimate

• Administrative sanction vs People’s validation

• (Informality) as a condition of transition vspunishment for squalor

Page 10: What Type of Urban Social Development We Want? by Noman … University_NAh… · Noman Ahmed URBAN SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE FOR DISCUSSION. 1.Inclusive –aprocesswhereinitiativesand

7. Qualifying interventions and institutionalarrangements

• Accepting peoples organisations as legitimate

• Supporting and replicating solutions that are plannedand executed by people

• Modifying and adjusting mega projects to people’sconcerns

• Safeguarding environmental assets for communitysurvival and sustenance

• Re-visiting public policy via lessons from communitysuccesses