What The Cost Of Your Engagement Ring May Say AboutYour Marriage

It is said a diamond is permanently -- but new analysis suggests the greater the diamondsengagement ring, the particular shorter the marriage might be.

Economics instructors from Emory University selected 3, 1000 U. S. adults who was simply marriedeventually in their life and found that will participants who spent big bucks on engagement rings andtheir wedding ceremonies were more likely to end up single.

Listed here are the two primary findings:

Men that spent $2, 000 in order to $4, 1000 on wedding rings had been 1 . 3 times more likely tofind yourself divorced as compared to men that spent $250 to $2, 000. Girls that received expensiveengagement rings also knowledgeable higher rates of separation and divorce.

Females whose wedding ceremonies cost $20, 000 or maybe more were three or more. 5 times moreprone to end up single than ladies who spent $5, 000 to be able to $10, 500. (According to The Knot,the standard cost of a wedding in the You. S. will be $30, 000).

Oddly enough, spending $1, 000 or less on the wedding was associated with a reduction in thechances of divorce, but investing too little with an engagement ring seemed to backfire; those whospent less than $500 knowledgeable higher rates of breakup.

The authors of the papers hypothesize the correlation among high wedding party and engagementring costs and divorce may have to do with financial anxiety placed on brides and grooms who aredetermined to have the best day, whether or not they can actually pay for it.

For example , ladies whose bands cost over $2, 1000 were 3 times more likely to complain aboutstress related to wedding party debt. Alternatively, those who put in less than $1, 000 on theweddings have been 82 to be able to 93 % less likely to get stressed out by simply wedding funds.

It seems sensible that investing an excessive amount on a wedding or perhaps engagement ringwithout being able to pay for it could cause unnecessary economic stress, why do it?

The experts place several blame on the wedding industry for creating a brand new standard in thelast fifty years through ad campaigns, magazines and inflated costs that provide brides in addition togrooms to pay, spend, invest.

"In 1959, Bride's recommended that will couples put aside two months to get ready for theirwedding party and published a register with 22 tasks to allow them to complete. With the 1990s, themagazine advised 12 months regarding wedding preparation and published a directory with forty-four tasks to complete. "

That they had this to say of engagement rings:

"Prior to World War II, in Western countries, simply 10 percent associated with engagement ringscontained a new diamond. At the conclusion of the millennium, about 80% did. This year, totalexpenses on diamond rings were roughly $7 billion in america. "

"Our findings provide little proof to support the validity of the wedding industry's general messagethat connects expensive weddings with optimistic marital outcomes, " the study states.

But don't call off your large nuptials just yet. The particular researchers discovered that possessingmore visitors -- not necessarily spending additional money -- resulted in longer relationships, as didhaving a honeymoon (even an inexpensive one! )

What do you think of these findings? Sound off inside the comments area below. Want moregemstone news? Check us out on Pinterest!

CORRECTION: A previous version of this article suggested an immediate relationship between costof a diamond ring and the probability of divorce. Terminology has been converted to reflect theanalysis found a new correlation involving the two.

Follow HuffPost Wedding's panel Engagement Bling on Pinterest.

Keep in touch! Check out HuffPost Weddings upon Facebook, Facebook and Pinterest. Sign up forthe newsletter here.

engagement rings under 5000