what makes a text a slow or fast read? speed bumps and passing lanes laura s. tortorelli michigan...
TRANSCRIPT
W H AT M A K E S A T E X T A S L O W O R FA S T R E A D ?
SPEED BUMPS AND PASSING LANES
L A U R A S . T O R T O R E L L IM I C H I G A N S T A T E U N I V E R S I T Y
L I T E R A C Y R E S E A R C H A S S O C I A T I O N C O N F E R E N C EC A R L S B A D , C A
D E C E M B E R 2 , 2 0 1 5
PURPOSE AND RATIONALE
How are text characteristics related to fluent reading?
Common Core State Standards for the early grades• Greater text complexity• Greater genre variety
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
TEXT COMPLEXITY IN THE ELEMENTARY GRADES
(MESMER, CUNNINGHAM, & HIEBERT, 2012)
Word complexit
y
Sentence complexit
y
Discourse structure
WORD COMPLEXITY (MESMER, CUNNINGHAM, & HIEBERT, 2012)
Words
Well-traveled ground
decodability
frequency
length
Less well-traveled ground
semantic features
SENTENCE COMPLEXITY (MESMER, CUNNINGHAM, & HIEBERT, 2012)
Sentences
Well-traveled ground length
Less well-traveled ground
syntax
“There are buildings where many people live and work.”
“Many people live and work in the buildings there.”
DISCOURSE STRUCTURE (MESMER, CUNNINGHAM, & HIEBERT, 2012)
Discourse
structure
New ground
genre
cohesion
READABILITY FORMULAS
Word Complexity Sentence
Complexity
Formula
Word Frequency Word Length Sentence Length
Source
Dale-Chall X X Dale & Chall, 1948Flesch-Kincaid X X Flesch, 1948Gunning Fog Index X X Gunning, 1952Forcast X Sticht, 1973Fry X X Fry, 1968Lexile X X MetaMetrics, 2000Powers-Sumners-Kearl
X X Powers, Sumners, & Kearl, 1958
Smog Index X McLaughlin, 1969Spache X X Spache, 1953Note: Adapted from “Can Readability Formulas Be Used to Successfully Gauge Difficulty of Reading Materials?” by J. C. Begeny and D. J. Greene, 2014,
Psychology in the Schools, 51, p. 200. Copyright 2014 by Wiley.
Summary of Readability Formulae Components
COH-METRIX TEXT EASABILITY ASSESSOR
(MCNAMARA, LOUWERSE, CAI, & GRAESSER, 2005)
• Provides automated text analysis of hundreds of variables• Based in research on psychology, computer
science, linguistics, and education• Assigns z scores based on the Touchstone Applied
Science Associates (TASA) corpus of texts
COH-METRIX Z SCORES
• Word Concreteness – the extent to a word can be seen, felt, tasted, and/or smelled• Syntactical Simplicity – a measure of syntactical
organization within a sentence• Narrativity – the extent to which a passage
follows characters through a series of actions• Referential cohesion – the repetition of ideas and
words throughout the passage• Deep cohesion – the presence of logical and
temporal connectives in a passage
COH-METRIX MEASURES OF TEXT COMPLEXITY
WordsLess well-traveled ground
semantic features
word concreteness
SentencesLess well-traveled ground
syntax syntactical simplicity
Discourse structure New ground
genre narrativity
cohesion
referential cohesion
deep cohesion
Mesmer et al. model Coh-Metrix z scores
THE PRESENT STUDY
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
1. What characteristics of texts are associated with lower reading rates (speed bumps) after controlling for reader factors?
2. What characteristics of texts are associated with higher reading rates (passing lanes) after controlling for reader factors?
DATA
Readers
• 22,349 2nd grade students from 387 public schools in Virginia
• No identified disabilities• 50.1% were male• 55.5% white, 26.6% black,
10.7% Hispanic, 2.4% Asian, and 4.8% other or two or more races
• Average age = 97.97 months
• 7% receiving ESL services
Texts
• Expository passages on science topics• Primer-6th grade level• All passages read with
comprehension
METHODOLOGY
• Multilevel modeling in HLM-7• Nesting passage readings in children • Advantages • Control for sources of variance at the reader level• Explore sources of variance at the text level
Level-1 Model WCPMti = π0i + π1i*(GRADELEVELti) + π2i*(NARRZti) + π3i*(REFCOHZti) + π4i*(DEEPCOHZti) + π5i*(WDCONZti) + eti
Level-2 Model π0i = β00 + β01*(FEMALEi) + β02*(NONWHITEi) + β03*(WRIi) + r0i π1i = β10 π2i = β20 π3i = β30 π4i = β40 π5i = β50
MEASURES
Readers
• Gender (binary, 0 = male)• Race (binary, 0 =
white)• PALS 1-3 WRI scores
Texts
• Passage grade level (based on readability formulae)
• Coh-Metrix z scores• Word concreteness• Narrativity• Referential cohesion• Deep cohesion
*Syntactical simplicity had to be dropped for reasons of collinearity
CHARACTERISTICS OF PASSAGES
Passage
Grade
Word Concreteness
Narrativity
ReferentialCohesion
Deep Cohesion
A Bear Cub in Spring Primer 2.335 0.824 1.867 -0.883
Where Do Animals Live?
1st
2.596 -0.687 1.349 -0.182
Nature’s Magicians
2nd 0.635 0.284 1.13 0.669
The World of Birds
3rd 2.106 -0.411 -0.605 0.603
Animals of the Night
4th 1.155 -0.055 -0.294 -0.054
Fossils 5th 1.211 -0.571 0.051 -0.874
Sloth for a Day 6th 0.591 0.525 -0.296 1.572
RESULTS
RESULTS
Fixed Effect Coefficient SE
Intercept 78.35* 0.86 Femalea 2.86* 0.26 Nonwhitea -4.40* 0.26
Word recognition 5.51* 0.05
Grade level -0.66* 0.15
Word concreteness 4.91* 0.28
Narrativity 2.73* 0.32 Referential cohesion 13.85* 0.30 Deep cohesion 0.77* 0.15
a = binary variables. *p <.0001
Reader
vari
able
sTe
xt
vari
able
s
DISCUSSION
•Grade level (as expected)
SPEED BUMPS
GRADE LEVEL
Low Grade Level
• Shorter and more frequent words• Shorter, simpler
sentences
High Grade Level
• Multisyllabic, rarer words• Longer, more complex
sentences (e.g., more passive voice)
Their skeletal structure is made for hanging upside down instead of standing upright.
They live in the den all winter.
•Word concreteness•Narrativity• Referential cohesion•Deep cohesion
PASSING LANES
WORD CONCRETENESS
High Word Concreteness
• Many specific nouns• Compare/contrast
structures• Lists of conceptually
related items, etc.• Content vocabulary
Low Word Concreteness
• Idiomatic language• Hypotheticals• High frequency words
How are nests, caves, and houses alike?
Wouldn’t you like to be a sloth for a day?
NARRATIVITY
High Narrativity
• Organized around main “characters”• Follow a series of
actions • Animate subjects and
action verbs
Low Narrativity
• Organized around a concept• List of facts• “To be” and passive
verbs
Sloths hang in trees for days at a time. They munch away at the delicious leaves that surround them.
Fossils are preserved remains of things that once lived, often millions of years ago. The word fossil comes from a Latin word meaning “to dig up.”
REFERENTIAL COHESION
High Referential Cohesion
• Repeat key content words, subjects, verbs, and pronouns• Explicitly link one
sentence to the next
Low Referential Cohesion
• Sentences do not explicitly repeat key words or concepts.• Emphasize variety
Animals live in many kinds of homes. They can live inside with people. They can live outside, too. Some animals live in nests. They can make nests in trees.
Their calls may be peeps or screams or lovely songs. They may live in forests or in cities.
DEEP COHESION
High Deep Cohesion
• Includes not just what happens but how, when, and why
Low Deep Cohesion
• Neutral connectives• Leave gaps that must
be filled in with inference or prior knowledge
In time, the eggs will hatch. When the eggs hatch, you will not believe your eyes. A caterpillar, not a butterfly, will come out of the egg.
Spring has come and they need to find food.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND FUTURE RESEARCH
• Text complexity is complex and multi-dimensional• Readability at the word and sentence level is only part of
the picture• Semantic content, genre, and cohesion have the
potential to ease or complicate reading
LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
• No measures of child vocabulary, grammatical knowledge, or prior knowledge of the passage content• Limited number of passages• Only expository texts
QUESTIONS?
Laura TortorelliAssistant Professor, Elementary Grades ReadingTeacher Education DepartmentCollege of EducationMichigan State UniversityE-mail: [email protected]