what did you say about muhammad - by raymond ibrahim

2
8/4/2019 What Did You Say About Muhammad - By Raymond Ibrahim http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/what-did-you-say-about-muhammad-by-raymond-ibrahim 1/2  What Did You Say About Muhammad?! As Muslims fume over Western cartoons of Muhammad, check out the disturbing things non- Westerners publicly say and get away with about the prophet by Raymond Ibrahim, Pajamas Media, May 12, 2010 Which is more likely to elicit an irate Muslim response: 1) public cartoons of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, or 2) public proclamations that Muhammad was a bisexual, sometime transvestite and necrophile, who enjoyed sucking on the tongues of children, commanded a woman to “breastfeed” an adult man, and advised believers to drink his urine for salutary health? Based on the recent South Park fiasco where an animated episode depicting Muhammad in a bear suit sparked outrage among various Muslim groups, culminating with the usual death threats  the answer is clear: cartoons, once again, have proven to be the Muslim world’s premiere provocateur. Indeed, just yesterday, during a university lecture, Swedish artist Lars Vilks, whose life is in jeopardy due to his depiction of Muhammad as a dog, was violently assaulted to undulations of “Allahu Akbar!” (Islam’s primordial war cry).  Yet how can cartoons rouse Muslim ire more than public assertions that Muhammad was a bisexual, a transvestite, a necrofile, et al? First, context: The evangelical Arabic satellite station, al-Haya (Life TV), regularly takes the Muslim prophet to task, especially on two weekly programs: Hiwar al-Haq (Truth Talk), hosted by Coptic priest Fr. Zakaria Botros, and Su’al Jari’ (Daring Question), hosted by ex-Muslim Rashid. Both shows revolve around asking uncomfortable questions about Islam and its founder in an effort to prompt Muslims to reconsider the legitimacy of their faith. (It is on these shows that the aforementioned, unflattering assertions of Muhammad originate; see here and here for English summaries.) These broadcasts are viewed by millions of Arabic-speaking Muslims around the world. That the satellite station strikes a Muslim nerve is evinced by the fact that it is formally banned in several Muslim nations, including Saudi Arabia, and is regularly condemned by Islam’s demagogues on mainstream Arabic media, including al Jazeera. When the programs first began airing, they certainly caused uproar in the Muslim world. Then, Muslims regularly called in cursing the hosts, promising them death and destruction (both here and in the hereafter). Al-Qaeda reportedly put a $60 million bounty on Fr. Zakaria’s head; and the priest is on CAIR’s radar. (See the father explain his mission in this rare English interview.) Far from being cowed by the daily death threats, however, Life TV and its unrepentant hosts have responded by upping the ante and providing even more anecdotes discrediting Muhammad. Rashid recently examined the theological implications of Muhammad’s hatred for the gecko lizard, which the prophet accused of being “an infidel and enemy of the believers.” Muslims who kill it in the first strike receive 100 “heavenly-points,” whereas those who kill it in two strikes receive only 70. More graphically, Fr. Zakaria recently examined canonical hadiths (authenticated Muslim accounts) that record Islam’s first believers eating Muhammad’s feces, marinating food in his sweat, drinking the water he gargled and spit out, and smearing his phlegm all over their faces all to his approval.

Upload: gilbert-hanz

Post on 07-Apr-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: What Did You Say About Muhammad - By Raymond Ibrahim

8/4/2019 What Did You Say About Muhammad - By Raymond Ibrahim

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/what-did-you-say-about-muhammad-by-raymond-ibrahim 1/2

 What Did You Say About Muhammad?!

As Muslims fume over Western cartoons of Muhammad, check out the disturbing things non- Westerners publicly say — and get away with — about the prophet 

by Raymond Ibrahim, Pajamas Media, May 12, 2010

Which is more likely to elicit an irate Muslim response: 1) public cartoons of the Muslim prophet

Muhammad, or 2) public proclamations that Muhammad was a bisexual, sometime transvestite

and necrophile, who enjoyed sucking on the tongues of children, commanded a woman to

“breastfeed” an adult man, and advised believers to drink his urine for salutary health? 

Based on the recent South Park fiasco — where an animated episode depicting Muhammad in abear suit sparked outrage among various Muslim groups, culminating with the usual death

threats — the answer is clear: cartoons, once again, have proven to be the Muslim world’s

premiere provocateur. Indeed, just yesterday, during a university lecture, Swedish artist Lars

Vilks, whose life is in jeopardy due to his depiction of Muhammad as a dog, was violently

assaulted to undulations of “Allahu Akbar!” (Islam’s primordial war cry). 

Yet how can cartoons rouse Muslim ire more than public assertions that Muhammad was a

bisexual, a transvestite, a necrofile, et al? First, context:

The evangelical Arabic satellite station, al-Haya (Life TV), regularly takes the Muslim prophet to

task, especially on two weekly programs: Hiwar al-Haq (Truth Talk), hosted by Coptic priest Fr.

Zakaria Botros, and Su’al Jari’ (Daring Question), hosted by ex-Muslim Rashid. Both showsrevolve around asking uncomfortable questions about Islam and its founder in an effort to prompt

Muslims to reconsider the legitimacy of their faith. (It is on these shows that the aforementioned,

unflattering assertions of Muhammad originate; see here and here for English summaries.)

These broadcasts are viewed by millions of Arabic-speaking Muslims around the world. That the

satellite station strikes a Muslim nerve is evinced by the fact that it is formally banned in several

Muslim nations, including Saudi Arabia, and is regularly condemned by Islam’s demagogues on

mainstream Arabic media, including al Jazeera.

When the programs first began airing, they certainly caused uproar in the Muslim world. Then,

Muslims regularly called in cursing the hosts, promising them death and destruction (both here

and in the hereafter). Al-Qaeda reportedly put a $60 million bounty on Fr. Zakaria’s head; and the

priest is on CAIR’s radar. (See the father explain his mission in this rare English interview.)

Far from being cowed by the daily death threats, however, Life TV and its unrepentant hosts

have responded by upping the ante and providing even more anecdotes discrediting

Muhammad. Rashid recently examined the theological implications of Muhammad’s hatred for 

the gecko lizard, which the prophet accused of being “an infidel and enemy of the believers.”

Muslims who kill it in the first strike receive 100 “heavenly-points,” whereas those who kill it in two

strikes receive only 70. More graphically, Fr. Zakaria recently examined canonical hadiths

(authenticated Muslim accounts) that record Islam’s first believers eating Muhammad’s feces,

marinating food in his sweat, drinking the water he gargled and spit out, and smearing his

phlegm all over their faces — all to his approval.

Page 2: What Did You Say About Muhammad - By Raymond Ibrahim

8/4/2019 What Did You Say About Muhammad - By Raymond Ibrahim

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/what-did-you-say-about-muhammad-by-raymond-ibrahim 2/2

Needless to say, Life TV’s hosts — especially the flamboyant Fr. Zakaria — are hated by

Muslims around the world. But to the careful observer, the outrage appears to be subsiding,

ostensibly replaced by apathy — that is, the default strategy when threats and displays of

indignation fail. Most callers are now Muslim converts to Christianity, who encourage and thank

Fr. Zakaria and Rashid (often in tears). Conversely, the diminishing angry callers usually spew a

barrage of insults, culminating with a “may-you-burn-in-hell,” and quickly — almost as if ashamed

of their childish behavior — hang up.

Now, back to our original observation: how can Life TV get away with outlandish weekly

disparagements concerning Muhammad, whereas Western cartoons spark widespread outrage?

Considering that millions of more Muslims watch Life TV than have ever heard of South Park

makes the question doubly puzzling.

The answer is simple: the South Park incident is less a reflection of Muslim anger and more of

Western appeasement. By constantly buckling in to the slightest Muslim displeasure — whether

by altering films, removing museum art, or canceling book launches — the West has perpetuated

a vicious cycle wherein Muslim sensitivities are ever heightened and outraged at the slightest

slight, and Western freedoms of expression are correspondingly diminished and trampled upon.

What’s worse, such self -imposed censorship falls right into the hands of homegrown Islamists

actively working to subvert Western civilization from within.

Conversely, by holding fast to onetime Western principles of free speech and open dialogue, Life

TV has conditioned its Muslim viewers to accept that exposure and criticism of their prophet is

here to stay. As Fr. Zakaria often points out, every religious figure is open to criticism: so why

should Muhammad be sacrosanct? (Indeed, Comedy Central, which was quick to acquiesce to

Muslim demands to censor South Park, is “brave” enough to run an entire cartoon series

mocking Jesus.)

Of course, one need not agree with Life TV’s tactics or evangelical mission to appreciate thelesson it imparts: Muslim outrage — as with all human outrage — is predicated on how well it is

tolerated. Continuously appeased, it becomes engorged and insistent on more concessions;

ignored, it deflates and, ashamed of itself, withers away. Put differently, if you voluntarily act like

a dhimmi — a subjugated non-Muslim who must live in debased humility — you will be treated

like a dhimmi (including by being killed for the slightest offense); conversely, if you assert

yourself like a freeman, you will be perceived as a freeman — even as you are hated.

To be fair, there is one caveat: whereas Muslims have no choice but to interpret South Park’s

and Lars Vilk’s caricatures of Muhammad as egregiously offensive — no known Muslim records

depict Muhammad as a bear or dog — the much more disturbing Life TV anecdotes all originate

in Islam’s most authoritative sources (Koran, hadiths, tafsirs, fatwas, etc). In other words,perhaps the anger toward Life TV is subsiding as Muslims become reconciled to the fact that, no

matter how abominable, what is being said about their prophet is, in fact, grounded in Muslim

sources, and thus must be true.

Yet if that is the case, seems like silly cartoons of Muhammad are the least of Muslims’

problems.

Raymond Ibrahim is the associate director of the  Middle East Forum , the author of  The Al Qaeda 

Reader, and a guest lecturer at the National Defense Intelligence College.