what ceos think about 2015’s top workforce issues

30
©SHRM 2015 ©SHRM 2015 MATT FERGUSON CEO, CAREERBUILDER @CBFOREMPLOYERS SHRM ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION WHAT CEOs THINK ABOUT 2015'S TOP WORKFORCE ISSUES June 30, 2015 2:15 – 3:30 p.m.

Upload: careerbuilder-for-employers

Post on 03-Aug-2015

11.280 views

Category:

Business


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

©SHRM 2015©SHRM 2015

MATT FERGUSONCEO, CAREERBUILDER@CBFOREMPLOYERS

SHRM ANNUAL CONFERENCE & EXPOSITION 

WHAT CEOs THINK ABOUT 2015'S TOP WORKFORCE ISSUESJune 30, 2015

2:15 – 3:30 p.m.

©SHRM 2015©SHRM 2015

OVERVIEWLabor Market

©SHRM 2015

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 YTD 2015-500

-400

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

95

-298

-424

88

174 186 194

260217

Job

Cre

atio

n (

00

0s)

3 |

AVERAGE MONTHLY NON-FARM JOB CREATION

(Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics)

©SHRM 20154 |

CHURN RATE VS. TOTAL NON-FARM JOBS, 2003-2013

(Source: The Pulse of U.S. Hiring Activity, 2014 CareerBuilder & EMSI Report)

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201350.0%

55.0%

60.0%

65.0%

70.0%

75.0%

80.0%

85.0%

90.0%

125,000,000

127,000,000

129,000,000

131,000,000

133,000,000

135,000,000

Churn Rate Jobs

©SHRM 20155 |

Nationwide survey conducted by Harris Poll on behalf of CareerBuilder

Participants: CEO or President of company, Chairman / Board Member, Partner / Principal, Owner

Companies with revenue of at least $50 million

CEO SURVEY

©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

ON WORKFORCE & RECRUITMENT CHALLENGES CEOs’ Views

©SHRM 2015

WHAT WORKFORCE CHALLENGES KEEP YOU UP AT NIGHT?

None of these

Other

Not enough diversity in the organization

Low morale

Potential layoffs due to automation, market conditions or other factors

The rate of voluntary turnover

Insufficient employee engagement

Pressure to raise wages

Being able to scale up globally

Change management

Development/training of teams and individuals needs to be more effective

Not enough good leaders within the organization

Managing costs associated with new legislation

The skills gap within our organization

14%

7%

11%

14%

16%

17%

18%

23%

23%

25%

25%

32%

32%

33%

7 |

©SHRM 2015

WAGE PRESSURE IN 2015:RAISES AT BOTH ENDS?

8 | Source: 2015 CareerBuilder Annual Forecast (Harris Poll)

IT, Sales, Engineering and Customer Service to see biggest increases for starting salaries.

©SHRM 2015

45% of employers expect to raise the minimum

wage within their organizations

53% of this group will raise it by $2 or more

on average

26% of employers expect

starting salaries to increase by 5% or more over the previous year

That’s almost 4 times higher than 2010 - 7%

©SHRM 20159 |

SKILLS GAP CONTINUES TO BE A MAJOR CONCERN

Nearly half of employers currently have open positions for which they can’t find qualified candidates

37% of employers have positions that stay open 12 weeks or longer; 1 in 6 companies loses $25,000 or more per open position due to extended vacancies

Source: CareerBuilder’s June 2014 and November 2013 nationwide studies of employers conducted by Harris Poll

©SHRM 2015

SKILLS GAP CONTINUES TO BE A MAJOR CONCERN

10 |

Software Developers

48,957

59,279

Total employment in 2014 Growth in jobs 2010-2014Annual job openings

2010-2014 Degree completion 2013Percentage of the

workforce ages 55+

Machinist 410,219 59,269 Up 17% 23,861 6,184 25%

Average Monthly Unique Job Postings vs. Average Monthly Hires: 2013-2014

Registered Nurses103,97

8

124,933

postings per month

postings per month

hires per month

hires per month

Source: Economic Modeling Specialists International, 2014

©SHRM 2015

My company has not been able to reach its full potential because we can’t find enough qualified candidates.

MAJORITY OF CEOs THINK SKILLS GAP HOLDS THEIR COMPANIES BACK

11 | ©SHRM 2015

8% 52% 32% 8%

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree

Agree 60% Disagree 40%

©SHRM 2015

WHAT ARE YOUR TOP RECRUITMENT CHALLENGES?

None of these

Other

We can't provide competitive compensation

Our employment brand is not known or not perceived positively

Our cost per hire is too high

We need a better strategy/process for recruiting in global markets

Our candidate experience is not as good as it could be

The recruitment process is not efficient - it takes too long to fill open positions

There aren't enough skilled candidates for the positions we need to fill

10%

3%

11%

17%

19%

23%

25%

30%

49%

12 |

©SHRM 2015

HOW WOULD YOU RATE THE RECRUITMENT EFFICIENCY OF YOUR HR TEAM?

Excellent, needs no im-provement

Good, but could use a little improvement

It's OK, we're getting by Bad, needs improvement Horrible, needs a lot of improvement

13%

65%

20%

2%0%

13 |

©SHRM 2015

My company has lost money due to an inefficient recruitment process.

INEFFICIENT RECRUITMENT HURTS BOTTOM LINE

14 | ©SHRM 2015

5.7% 42.0% 39.8% 12.5%

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree

Agree 48% Disagree 52%

©SHRM 2015

HOW WOULD YOU RATE YOUR CANDIDATE EXPERIENCE?

Excellent, needs no im-provement

Good, but could use a little improvement

It's OK, we're getting by Bad, needs improvement Horrible, needs a lot of improvement

16%

65%

16%

3%0%

15 |

©SHRM 2015

4 in 10 recruiters and HR managers have never tried to apply for one of their own positions.

6 in 10 job seekers say they’ve quit an online application mid-process due to how long or complex it was.

16 | Source: “How Candidate Experience is Transforming HR Technology,” which was conducted by Harris Poll on behalf of CareerBuilder, 2014 ©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

WHAT ARE YOUR TOP RECRUITMENT TECHNOLOGY CHALLENGES?

None of these

Other

We're limited in terms of where we can post jobs globally

We can't accurately track and report on our sources of hire, so we're wasting time and money

Our recruitment technology is not mobile-responsive

Our recruitment technology doesn't provide real-time data on the best locations to recruit the candidates we need

We use several different sources to recruit candidates and can't coordinate to search across them

Our recruitment technology is not efficient - it takes too long to find and engage candidates

We can't automatically re-engage candidates who have shown interest in jobs in the past

Our recruitment technology is outdated or limits what we can do

25%

3%

16%

17%

17%

18%

22%

23%

26%

30%

17 |

©SHRM 2015

MOBILE JOB SEARCH IS TAKING OVER . . .TRAFFIC TO CAREERBUILDER.COM

18 | ©SHRM 2015

3-5%

2010

10%

2012

33%

2013

40%

2014

43% YTD

2015

©SHRM 201519 |

49%Don’t revisit or re-engage

with past candidates, leaving a pool of interested talent

untapped.

20%Don’t have a system that

enables them to remarket to candidates.

37%Don’t have the time to re-engage past candidates.

©SHRM 2015

A SIGNIFICANT NUMBER OF EMPLOYERS NEVER RECONNECT WITH PAST CANDIDATES

Source: CareerBuilder/Harris Poll Q2 2015 Employer Survey

©SHRM 2015

Job Boards

Talent Network

ATS

Career Site

Job Aggregators

Internal Surveys

RPO Referrals HRIS

Excel Spreadsheets

20 | ©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

& ADVICE TO HRCEOs’ EXPECTATIONS

©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT FROM YOUR HR LEADERS?

22 |

65%Foster culture of excellence.

64%Acquire talent in timely

manner, regardless of role or skill set

needed.

61%Keep CEO informed of important human capital issues within

the company and strategies

to address them.

©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

HOW IS HR EFFECTIVENESS MEASURED?

None of these

Other

Revenue performance (i.e., having the right people in place to grow at the rate we should be growing)

Effectiveness in succession planning

How we benchmark against the industry

Productivity (i.e., having the right people in place to reach desired productivity)

Rate of turnover (ability to hold on to top performers and intellectual capital)

Speed at which we fill positions

Ability to effectively manage compensation and benefits costs

Training and development programs (i.e., seeing improvements in employee performance)

Employee satisfaction

Quality of new hires based on performance and retention

7%

1%

23%

27%

31%

35%

40%

43%

45%

47%

53%

56%

23 |

©SHRM 2015

“Opinions expressed by HR carry a greater weight with senior management post-recession.”

GROWING INFLUENCE OF HR POST-RECESSION

24 | ©SHRM 2015

12.5% 52.3% 30.7% 4.5%

Strongly agree Agree Disagree Strongly disagree

Agree 65% Disagree 35%

©SHRM 2015

HOW CAN HR LEADERS DEVELOP BROADER INFLUENCE WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION?

I do not believe that HR leaders can have broader influence within the organization

Other

Obtain an MBA

Ask to be involved in more business decisions

Proactively work with other leaders to help solve business problems

Know what the company does, but also know how everything works

Show ways to increase efficiencies or cut costs by better using the organization's human capital

Provide me with actionable human capital data and other research to help devise strategies to meet larger business goals

8%

1%

15%

34%

51%

52%

57%

57%

25 |

HR leaders can have broader influence:92%

©SHRM 2015

HOW IMPORTANT IS IT FOR HR LEADERS TO . . .?

26 | ©SHRM 2015

35% 55% 9%1%

Essential/Important 90% Unimportant 10%

33% 55% 9% 3%

Absolutely essential Important Not very important Not at all important

Essential/Important 88% Unimportant 12%

Be proficient in workforce analytics

Be knowledgeable about new recruitment and HR strategies

©SHRM 2015

of hiring managers and recruiters rate their proficiency with workforce analytics as poor/fair.52%

of HR departments regularly use Big Data in recruitment strategies.14%

never do.50%

©SHRM 201527 | Source: Q2 2015 CareerBuilder/Harris Poll Employer Survey (2,200 HR/Hiring managers)

©SHRM 2015

WHY USE DATA?#1 Learn the Market

#2 Educate Internal Stakeholders

#3 Determine What Tactics Work/Don’t Work

28 | ©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

WHY USE DATA?#4 It Pays Dividends

65% of employers who use big data in recruitment said it lowered their cost per hire; 30% said by $500 or more.

66% of employers who use big data in recruitment said it reduced their time to hire; 38% said by two weeks or more. (Source: Q2 2015 CareerBuilder/Harris Poll Employer Survey)

Firms adopting data-driven decision making increase productivity 5-6%. (Source: The Talent Equation)

29 | ©SHRM 2015

©SHRM 2015

@CBforEmployerswww.careerbuilder.comwww.thetalentequationbook.com

Learn more at: